The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCorrespondence Page 1 of 4 Conn, Angelina V "'":'~'''~'";'".~.'''''~'-~'-''--'-'-''''~~'-''-A_''_"~~'''~'~'''"'_'_''''''"'-"'~~..~,~;";"'_~_~__,~"...~_~.~""'-.--...__ From: Conn, Angelina V Sent.: Wednesday. June 04, 2008 11 :56 AM To: 'Weiss, Zeff A.' Cc: Holmes, Christine B; Hollibaugh, Mike P Subject: RE: June 3 Plan Commission committee department reports - 116th & college pud - parking Hi Zeff - regarding the final development plan for the 116th and college pud, you will need BZA variance approval to have parking in the side yard. Christine will help you through the process and she is copied on this email. Also, you can utilize the BZA hearing officer route, so that the fees are less and the timeline is shorter. Thanks, Angie Conn, Planning Administrator Dept. of Community Services - Planning & Zoning 1 Civic Square, 3rd Floor City of Carmel, IN 46032 p.317-571-2417 f.317-571-2426 aconn@carmel.in.gov From: Weiss, Zeff A. [mailto:Zeff.Weiss@icemiller.comJ Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 200810:39 AM To: Conn, Angelina V Subject: RE: June 3 Plan Commission committee department reports ~ no problem. I will see you tonight. Regards, Zeff Zeff A. Weiss Ice Miller LLP One American Square Suite 3100 Indianapolis, IN 46282-0200 (317) 236-2319 (direct dial) (317) 592-4788 (direct fax) zeff. \veiss(@.icemiIJer.com From: Conn, Angelina V [mailto:Aconn@carmel.in.gov] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 10:38 AM To: Weiss, Zeff A. Subject: RE: June 3 Plan Commission committee department reports Not yet. I will try to catch him today. Angie Conn, Planning Administrator Dept. of Community Services - Planning & Zoning 1 Civic Square, 3rd Floor City of Carmel, IN 46032 p.317-571-2417 f, 317-571-2426 6/4/2008 Page 1 of2 Conn, Angelina V From: Conn, Angelina V Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 10:29 PM To: Weiss, Zeff A. Ce: Hollibaugh, Mike P Subject: RE: June 3 Plan Commission committee department reports hi zeff: we did have a meeting about this with mike h, and that is when he said that this propsal would have to go to committee because we could not approve the parking area along the side of the building administratively. he never really said that a variance was needed, and so, it is still up in the air, i think. i will defer my comments to mike. mike- will they need hearing officer variance approval for the parking lot that is not at the rear of the building for the 116th and college pud? or will the adls amendment approval be enough? thanks, angie ""-~;~"""~""'---""""<"'"<~~--"""'~~'---~'-"----~"""""~"'C"--"-'"Y''''""",,"~-CC;'.<<''~~'.~~"""-'''''''''""""~~~-C"'~,.,..,,,,,,,.',~,_~.,"..,,,-.,,~ From: Weiss, Zeff A. (mailto:Zeff.Weiss@icemiller.com] Sent: Fri 5/30/2.008 8:04 AM To: Connf Angelina V Subject: RE: June 3 Plan Commission committee department reports Angie, Please confim1 that we are good to go on 116th Street Centre II, LLC. The staff report suggests the possibility of requiring a variance. I do not recall that discussion and want to make sure we are all on the same page. I realize that you are out of the office unt1lMonday. I'll wait to hear from you next week. Thanks. Regards, Zeff Zeff A. Weiss Ice Miller LLP One American Square Suite 3100 Indianapolis, fN 46282-0200 (317) 236-2319 (direct dial) (317) 592-4788 (direct fax) zeff weiss@licemiller.com From: Conn, Angelina V [mailto:Aconn@carmel.in.gov] Sent: ThursdaYf May 29f 2008 11:15 AM To: Angie Molt; Boonef Rachel M.; Brewerf Scott I; Bruce Smith; Carolyn Schleif; Coy, Sue E; Donahue-Wold, Alexia K; Dormanf Jay; Duncan, Gary R; Ellison, Christopher M; Hancock, Ramona B; Heck, Nancy S; Hollibaugh, 6/2/2008 : :Y: . ICE r1 ~ L LiE ~LLP LEG Ale 0 U N S E l May 23, 2008 ~ RECEfVED MAY 23 2008 DOCS WRITER'S I)IRECT NUM9ER: (3 I 7) 236-2319 DIRECTI'AX: (317) 592-4788 INTERNET: ZUf.WcJSS@JCEMILLER.C()M VIA HAND DELIVERY Cam1el Plan Commission/Special Studies Committee c/o Ms. Angelina Conn Planning Administrator Department of Community Services Planning & Zoning City of Carmel 1 Civic Square, 3rd Floor Cannel, IN 46032 RE: 116th Street Centre II, LLC/Planned Unit Development ("PUD") 116th (ii) Collcl.!c Ave. Final Development Plan/PUn Ordinance No. Z-484-0S Dear Ms. COlUl/Ladies-Gentlemen: In furtherance of the submission of the Final Development Plan in connection with Docket No. 08040001, attached please find a copy of (i) Ordinance Z-484-05, as passed by the Carmel Common Council, (ii) the proposed Final Development Plan for 1161h Street Centre II, (iii) a proposed Screening/Landscape Plan, together with (iv) the Conceptual Site Development Plan that was attached to and approved in connection with PUD Ordinance No. Z-484-05 on November 21,2005. You will note that we have highlighted on the attached Final Development Plan those areas that have been modified. Specifically, the modifications from the Conceptual Site Plan to the Final Site Plan are as follows: 1. Inclusion of a median at the center entryway along College Avenue; 2. A separation between the buildings located at the corner of College Avenue and E. 116th Street, creating a pedestrian corridor and seating area between the two buildings; 3. Establishment of a 12,000 square foot building where the "outlot" was originally proposed. This new building will have the same elevations, height and architectural features as the other buildings previously proposed and approved; and 4. Establishment of a landscaping screen/seating area between the buildings fronting on the west side of the cntryway along East 116th Street. One American Square I Suite 3100 I Indianapolis, IN 46282-0200 I P 317 -236-2100 I F 317-236-2219 INDIANAPOLIS I CHICAGO I DUPAGE COUNTY Il I WASHINGTON DC wwwicemiller.com Cannel Plan Commission Angelina Conn May 23,2008 Page 2 This submittal is not intended to address final site development issues such as drainage and engineering that will be submitted to the appropriate City departments prior to requesting building pemlits/improvement location permits. We look forward to addressing any comments at the Special Studies Committee meeting on Tuesday, June 3, 2008. In the meantime, however, please do not hesitate to call me at 317- 236-2319 if you have any comments or questions. Very tmly yours, ZA W:sd Enclosures cc: Greg Small Mark Zukennan Datm Small Glen Meinecke Randy Watson I LER LLP )M~ 1/2155367.1 Page 1 of 1 Conn, Angelina V .,.....,..'^."'""'~"'=-,.,...-~.~._~,~~.~.c~,.,".~"'..',.,.-,.-._ ........~"C""-"......,,,-..~'t":-~""'''_~~~_~,_~~......,.._,...,,~.''''''''''".".~"'N;"'....'''''_''~'~-=-"""""-""""~""""'-c~~....~."","..... From: Brewer, Scott I Sent: Thursday, April 17, 200810:31 AM To: Conn, Angelina V Cc: 'Brandon Schreeg'; dub164@AOL.COM; 'Randy Watson'; 'shirley,hunter@duke-energy.com' Subject: East 116th Street and Kirkwood Dr (116th street centre, phase 2) Dear Angie; During my meeting with Randy and Equicor's planting contractor TMT (Suzie Dubois), I received a copy of the associated landscape plan for this area. It was done by Brandon Schreeg of Remenschneider Associates, and I called him and a phone conversation after with him. What is not readily apparent from the plan (Brandon told me) that there is a 4 foot wall going in (mainly because of grade change) that will have boxwood shrubs in front of it and trees behind it. In light of that the plant material appears sufficient for a visual buffer. They are also putting some areas of structural soil. They seem to be rather limited in size and volume. I have asked Brandon to expand the limits of structural soil to the parking lot, and then under the pavement (patio and sidewalk) up to the building, He agreed that could be done. I also asked him to check with Duke Energy (and gave him some contacts _ Shirley Hunter, Thomas Ordway) about the location they are showing the transformer in, and the landscaping around it. I think Duke will have some objections to that. Scott Brewer, City Forester Environmental Planner, DOCS City of Carmel, One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 PH: 317-571-2478 FAX: 317-571-2426 Urban Forestry is the center of sustain ability for municipalities 4/17/2008 Page 1 of3 Conn, Angelina V '~~"""-'~"-""--'-'-~._"-_><<''"'''''''"'~~~~''''''''"",.''-''M-~'_~~_~~',,~~, From: Weiss, Zeft A. [Zeff.Weiss@icemiller.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 11 :28 AM To: Conn, Angelina V Cc: Brewer, Scott I; Donahue-Wold, Alexia K; Hollibaugh, Mike P; gmeinecke@equicor.com Subject: RE: Docket No. Assignment: (TAC) 116th and College PUD final Development Plan (#08040001 TAC) Angie, This is in follow up to my voice mail message of earlier today. In light of your comments noted below, we are going to need some more time to fully address the same. We are hopeful that we can satisfy the City Forester based on our revised landscape plan.. However, Randy Watson of Equicor has not been able to catch up with him. We would like to see if we can heavily landscape the space between the buildings along 116th where the space exists between the proposed buildings. We believe this is consistent with our original concept with the proposed drive-though on the then contemplated out lot. This may also effect our parking ratio, although we believe that we will still comply with the PUD Ordinance in that regard. Thus, we respectfully request that we be tabled tomorrow at the T AC meeting and be rescheduled as soon as we can satisfy Staff in regard to these issues. Please let me know if you need a more formal request and/or if we should give notice to a broader group in this regard. As always, thanks for your time. Regards, Zeff Zeff A. Weiss Ice Miller LLP One American Square Suite 3100 Indianapolis, IN 46282-0200 (317) 236-2319 (direct dial) (317) 592-4788 (direct fax) ?:_~tI'.Yl:i.~~@ic;~m.i.JI~.LgQJ11 .~'-=-=.-_-~"-C~"~"""""""'"~~_-"~."C"".'~~_~~~'"" From: Conn, Angelina V [mailto:Aconn@carmel.in.gov] Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 11:27 AM To: Weiss, Zeff A. Cc: Brewer; Scott Ii Donahue-Wold, Alexia K; Hollibaugh, Mike Pi gmeinecke@equicor.com Subject: RE: Docket No. Assignment: (TAC) 116th and College PUD final Development Plan (#08040001 TAC) Hello, Zeff: in looking at the proposed changes, and as I already relayed to Larry Hafetz in November 2007, please note the following: 1.) Please look at Chapter 21 O.A of the PUD ordinance Z-484-05. Parking is only allowed at the rear of buildings. 4/15/2008 Page 1 of 1 Conn, Angelina V From: rademakerfingr@aol.com Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 3:31 PM To: Littlejohn, David W; Conn, Angelina V Subject: Re: Alt Trans TAC Review David & Angie, There is currently a bicycle "rack" parking area located between tennis court and current bath house. Our parking lot has approximately 30 automobile parking spaces. The current bicycle rack will accomodate at least 10 bicycles with flow over space for more. This cunent area will not be affected by project. John Rademaker -----Original Messagen--- From: Littlejohn, David W <dlittlejohn@carmel.in.gov> To: rademakerfingr@aol.com Sent: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 10: 14 am Subject: Alt Trans TAC Review Mr. Rademaker, Attached are the comments concerning Alternative Transportation for the Village of Mt Carmel - Bathhouse Remodel & Addition. Sincerely, David Littlejohn Alternative Transportation Coordinator Department of Community Services City of Carmel One Civic Sq Carmel, IN 46032 (317) 571-2306 Get the M<3RQl.JElstIQ.QJ9.9T, Maps, Traffic, Directions & More! 4/9/2008 Page 1 of2 Conn, Angelina V From: Conn, Angelina V Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 11 :27 AM To: 'Weiss, Zeft' A.' Cc: Brewer, Scott I; Donahue-Wold, Alexia K; Hollibaugh, Mike P; 'gmeinecke@equicor.com' Subject: RE: Docket No. Assignment: (TAC) 116th and College PUD final Development Plan (#08040001 TAC) Hello, Zeff: in looking at the proposed changes, and as I already relayed to Larry Hafetz in November 2007, please note the following: 1.) Please look at Chapter 2.1 O.A of the PUD ordinance Z -484-05. Parking is only allowed at the rear of buildings. 2.) In addition, chapter 2.10.0 requires 43.6 parking spaces for this proposed 12,000 s.f. building. Please provide Staff with a parking breakdown chart for the whole site to show that it meets the parking requirements. For this new building, I only counted 37 new parking spaces. You may need variance approval for the reduced number of parking spaces. 3.) DOCS will also need a revised landscape plan. Scott Brewer, City Forester, will also have to review/approve the revised landscape plan. See you next Wednesday, Angie Conn, Planning Administrator Dept. of Community Services - Planning & Zoning 1 Civic Square, 3rcl Floor City of Carmel, IN 46032 p.317-571-2417 f.317-571-2426 aconn@carmel.in.90v From: Conn, Angelina V Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 4:27 PM To: Stewart, Lisa M; Weiss, Zeft A.; 'gmeiflec:ke@equicor,com' Cc: Boone, Rachel M.; Blanchard, Jim E; Brennan, Kevin S; Brewer, Scott I; Coy, Sue E; DeVore, Laura B; Hancock, Ramona B; Hollibaugh, Mike P; Haimes, Christine Bi Keeling, Adrienne M; Littlejohn, David W; Stewart, Lisa M; Tingley, Connie S; Weddington, Trudy A.; Duncan, Gal)' R; Donahue-Wold, Alexia K; Redden, Nick; Lillard, Sarah N Subject: Docket No. Assignment: (TAC) 116th and College PUD final Development Plan (#08040001 TAC) I have issued the necessary Docket Number for (TAC) 116th and College PUD - final Development Plan. It is as follows: Docket No. 08040001 TAC: 116th and College PUD - Final Development Plan The applicant seeks final development plan approval; minor changes proposed. The site is located at the northeast carner of College Ave and 116th Street. It is zoned PUD/Planned Unit Development. Filed by Zeff Weiss of Ice Miller for Equicor Companies. TAC Application Fee: Total Fee: $286.00 $286.00 Petitioner. please note the following: 1. This item will be on the April 16 agenda of the Technical Advisory Committee (T AC). The petitioner must submit plans and review materials to all TAC members directly by March 21 (already done). (Failure to submit plans and review materials to TAC members by this time will result in the tabling of this petition to the May 21 TAC meeting. For a list of current TAC members go to: httg://www.ci.carmel.in.us/services/DOCS/T AC2008/T AC%20mem bers%20revised%2004.01 .20G8.pdf ) 2. This item is subject to administrative review/approval only. 3. The Filing Fee [s due on or before April 16. Department of Community Service's Initial Review Comments: 1.) Please highlight, on the site plan, all changes proposed. 2.) Additional comments maybe made at the TAC meeting. 4/9/2008 ~. I RLLP LEGAL COUNSEl April 4, 2008 WltlTER'S DIRECT NUM8ER: (317) 236-1319 DIRECT FAX: (317) 592-4788 Im'ERNET: Zdf. Weiss@icemiller.cam VIA E-MAIL T AC MEMBERSI Angie Conn RE: 1161b Street Centre IT, LLC Planned Unit Development ("POD") Final Development Plan/PUD Ordinance No. Z-484-05 Dear Ms. ConnlLadies-Gentlemen: In furtherance of the submission ofthe Final Development Plan in connection with Docket No. 08040001, attached please find a copy of the Conceptual Site Development Plan that was attached to and approved in cOlmection with PUD Ordinance No. 2-484-05 on November 21, 2005, together with the proposed Final Development Plan. You will note that we have highlighted on the attached Final Development Plan those areas that have been modified. Specifically, the modifications from the Conceptual Site Plan to the Final Site Plan are as follows: 1. Inclusion of a median at the center entryway along College Avenue; 2. A separation between the buildings located at the comer of College Avenue and E. 1 16th Street, creating a pedestrian corridor and seating area between the two buildings; and 3. Establishment of a 12,000 square foot building where the "outlot" was originally proposed. This new building will have the same elevations, height and architectural features as the other buildings previously proposed and approved. This submittal is not intended to address final site development issues such as drainage and engineering that will be submitted to the appropriate departments prior to requesting building penn its/improvement location permits. We look forward to addressing your comments at the T AC meeting on April 16, 2008. In the meantime, however, please db not hesitate to call if you have any comments or questions. Very truly yours, ICE MILLER LLP ?z.?6 fJ WJk,'" J~C ZeffA. Weiss ZAW:sd Enclosures cc: Greg Small (via e-mail w/ene.) Mark Zukerman (via e-mail w/enc.) Dann Small (via e-mail w/ene.) Glen Meinecke (via e-mail w/enc.) O~e American Sql)~re I Suite 3100 i Indianapolis, IN 46282-0200 I P 317-<36-2100! F 317-236~2219 INDI/,NAPOUS I CHICAGO I DUPAGE COUNTY IL I WASHINGTON DC www.icerniIJer.com 112110917.1 Page] of 1 Conn, Angelina V From: Dunlap, Susan [Susan.Dunlap@icemillercamJ on behalf of Weiss, Zeff A. [Zeff.Weiss@icemiller.com] Friday, April 04, 2008 5:24 PM Holmes, Christine B; Duncan, Gary R; Redden, Nick; Akers, William P; Hohlt, William G; Brewer, Scott I; Duffy, John M; Fogarty, Michael D; Littlejohn, David W; Ellison, Christopher M; Krueskamp, Theresa A; del@co.hamilton.in.us; Westermeier, Mark; jtl@co.hamilton.in.us; grh@co.hamilton.in.us; bmg@co.hamilton.in.us; jason .kirkman@mybrighthouse.com; shirley. hu nter@duke-energy.com; jen nifer:marlett@veoliawaterna.com; rfarrand@ccs.k12.in.us; ryan.hartman@ctrwd.org; david.malone@su9.com; ron.morris@aes.com; gilko@crossroadengineers.com; Huffman, David; dale.m.sparks@usps.gov; cshupperd@vectren.com; Foley, Amanda J; gary.mcnamee@duke- energy.com Conn, Angelina V; Gmeinecke@equicor.com; dsmall@equicor.com; mzukerman@equicor.com; gsmall@equicor.com Subject: RE: 116th Street Centre II, LLC Final Development Plan/ PUD Ordinance No. Z-484-05 Attachments: Letter to T AC members re 116th Street Centre II, LLC .pdt; 116th Street Centre Original Conceptual Site Plan.pdf; 116th Street Proposed Final Conceptual Site Plan.pdf Sent: To: Cc: Please see attached letter and drawings regarding the final development plan for 116th Street Centre II, LLC. Regards, Zeff Zeff A. Weiss Ice Miller LLP One American Square Suite 3100 Indianapolis, IN 46282 (317) 236-2319 (317) 592-4788 fax l',effwt::.i!i!i@ic_~milJ~r.c;Qm ****************************************************************************************** CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Except to the extent that this advice concerns the qualification of any qualified plan, to ensure compliance with U.S. Treasury Department Regulations, we are now required to advise you that, unless otherwise expressly indicated, any federal tax advice contained in this communication, including any attachments, is not intended or written by us to be used, and cannot be used, by anyone for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties that may be imposed by the federal government or for promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This E-mail and any attachments are contidential and may be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this E-mail or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify us illlillediately by returning it to the sender and delete this copy from your system. Thank you. ICE MILLER LLP ****************************************************************************************** 4/7/2008 '~ ~ ~ : \'l : =} ~ !t r;' IJl "' III -0 Ig 116th Street Centre roposed Final ! oriceptuaJ Site Plan .' --:::J j 1 . , I j I ] 1, -I !. , " '4 I' " ~~., --~r:-..~- ....._, ~W ;1,,~ ----- ;r ~n!i;~I. iJJ': ~-----" _ h l~i! ., ~ ~ :, !,ir~:; i "., <oS f'91 ~-[i1l I, l;; - · - , -~ 'il~ ~;i , I ,j; Ii! irl , ~ f ~I , ~a: 9 IH~ Jl g' -.-; I i ! ~, ' . : li,'U' 1 U~ ; ~' ~ ---...... ;,j-~ t. "II. '_', 1" ' -~- ----..~ ~ 0' ~ ~.@lfflr l!.\Y(WlN .~,;~ ~; " Illl h ~)- ~] ~If 1 "U' . . ;, f r d Ill:: ~~r} 'X !- ... Il 'I ,ll![! ':n -< 1 ,I. .1 Y-' ~rr:.\ijl F'-ii6lh ~treet Centre'- I! ~ i <:::::9'!I-" Mil> /10 CDIIIrJq 'II ~! ~ ~ !!l I CAIIMEL. INDIANA i I ~ II ;- . dcO'doptJ~t prapc.cd bJ" " L "~I Illqul(!()/' Comp8f1iclJ, lJ,C i; . 1,=-:.., o ~... UZl:H...........,.ro-.](C]S~ .nM,....l:tao-r.,-.....oIrnrI ..;tt...ll;JOl....."rfI'J1'Zl. ===:J .-" E~ONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN . i i f i ! "r ,. I: 'I: !=: ~ rHi I,J , " j n , Iii , j I !ij :5 , W p "., i j , i ! ! . , . ... ~------., i .~.~.~-~ 6Ft (/" \_~. ~ , /" ( '.-) ,_J 1 I i I j ~ ! ~.-~ tin ;-1 -1--1, t4E. r i;:l ~ -::J I "DB f'i 'tTJ HI !'t~M' Detention 0 Area ~~- ---~~~----/~~~~- ! , , r j "'.. ,.. 0- ... '" _;- i i li il.~I'! S~ It ., ~ I : II, . i Ii II ii ! I ~ '. I ~.~ lr i J ~ 0 f II" G II Ii Ii ! :! li:~ 111 ~ ! I, I' [I ~I :~ " I oJ :; ... Q J i" ~ ~j:" t. I : i ~ I ! I i ~ J l~ :I !~~! fi I! D Ii ~ f PI I , ( iji H Ii ,; I, Ii.. t! ". " ~ Ii . I i ! I' ; (.:, III'l': ' , . I', '. ' I 1 b /,1 I , !l - 'If (I lp Amended i,'Hlfl!PIImWH!H1IH.FIIJ i! ~ I 'I, jllll'II!}J"IJ!1 ll,t" f. Ir"~rff.r.t'l..ll' " rl:ll~'i "f if.! Illllfl%I~H rdlJf ;Jrf f ~ 11',-dl'11/'I. "f!:lf+tA;lilrilhr-f II" ,1 'p f 11 ;4! I III < I'1I r i~iif!!!i!HU!mHHm;mi Ii iHJ,~mHb1,:l1lfil~If1Wf!lf If '0< fW"11I11I!:<ir!"r{ l!f I, 11:1:~1! ''",:I!.'lff!'!11rrJ i < 'ilj j'lr'l! iWfl'H;dl~(~fI r fj,.lIU illi~~liJimp.l;lr! ~ Jt'll!l ijl!irlf~!I.llIf!t'ripl!'n 1 \ r ....L. .. ~IO $llif;.1 , ~o iPl .e~1 R. ::J: AMENDED SITE PLAN I " 2 N ~ W~ III ::::<;n116TH STREET & COLLEGE AVENUE MPA ~~r..l.~ ... U30mrD -O! ~ ~ 0.-.. :1 CU)CE I = ~~~~H()KS --...._.__.~_...". -U.l'\.M..."......p'l11"?-11"!"5 VERSION A 11/18/05 Page 1 of2 Conn, Angelina V From: Greg IIko [gilko@crossroadengineers.com] Thursday, April 03, 2008 11 :52 AM 'Weiss, Zeff A.'; Conn, Angelina V Holmes, Christine B; Duncan, Gary R; Redden, Nick; Akers, William P; Hohlt, William G; Brewer, Scott I; Duffy, John M; Fogarty, Michael D; Littlejohn, David W; Ellison, Christopher M; Krueskamp, Theresa A; del@co.hamilton.in.us; Westermeier, Mark; jtl@co.hamilton.inus; grh@co.hamilton.in.us; bmg@co.hamilton.in.us; jason .kirkman@mybrighthouse.com; shirley.hunter@duke-energy.com; jennifer.marlett@veoliawaterna.com; rfarrand@CCS.k12.in.us; ryan. hartman@ctrwd.org; david.malone@sug.com; ron.morris@aes.com; Huffman, David; dale.m.sparks@usps.gov; cshupperd@vectren.com; Foley, Amanda J; gary.mcnamee@duke-energy,com; gsmall@equicor.com; mzukerman@equicor.com; dsmall@equicor.com; Gmeinecke@equicor.com Subject: RE: 116th Street Centre II, LLC Planned Unit Development - Final Development Plan/ PUD Ordinance No. Z -484-05 Sent: To: Cc: Thete is nothing for us to review with the information presented at this time. We will need to have a hard copy, full size setofconstruction drawings and drainage calculations for review once they are available. Thanks, Gregory J. IIko CrossRoad Engineers, PC 3417 Sherman Drive Beech Grove, IN 46107 office: 317.780.1555exl.112 fax: 317.780.6525 web: www.crossroadengineers.com From: Dunlap, Susan [mailto;Susan.Dunlap@icemiller.comJ On Behalf Of Weiss, Zeft A. Sent: ThLJrsday, April 03, 2008 11:36 AM To: Conn, Angie Cc: cholmes@carmel.in,gov; gduncan@carmeJ.in.gov; nredden@carmel.in.gov; wakers@carmel.in.gov; whohlt@carmel.in.gov( sbrewer@carmel.in;gov; jduffy@carmel.in.gov; mfogarty@carmel.in.gov; dlittlejohn@carmel.in.gov; cellison@carmel.in.gov; tkrueskamp@carmel.in.goy; del@co.hamilton.in.us; mwestermeier@carmel.in.gov; jt/@co.hamilton.in.us; grh@co.hamilton.in.us; bmg@co.hamilton.in.us; jason. kirkma n@mybrighthouse.com; shirley. hunter@duke-energy.com; jennifer. marlett@veoliawaterna.com; rfi'mand@ccs.k12.in.us; ryan .hartman@ctrwd.org; david .malone@sug.com; ron.morris@aes.com; gilko@crossroadengineers.com; dhuffman@carmel.in.gov; dale.m, spa rks@usps.gov; csh upperd@vectren.com; afoley@carmeJ.in.gov; gary.mcnamee@duke-energy.com; gsmall@equicor.com; mzukerman@equicor.com; dsmall@equicar.com; Gmeinecke@equicor.com Subject: 116th Street Centre II, LLC Planned Unit Development - Final Development Planj PUD Ordinance No. Z-484-0S Attached please find a cover letter and submittal that we have filed in anticipation of appearing before T AC on April 16, 2008. Please call if you have any conunents or questions. Regards, Zeff Zeff A. Weiss Ice Miller LLP One American Square Suite 3100 4/3/2008 Page 1 of 1 Conn, Angelina V From: Conn, Angelina V Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 1: 18 PM To: Weiss, Zeft A. Ce: 'Hafetz, Larry'; Hollibaugh, Mike P; 'gmeinecke@equicar.com'; Boone, Rachel M. Subject: 11 th street centre PUD - minor site plan changes Hi, Zeft: The three proposed changes to the site glan will only require Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Review. The next TAC filing deadline is April 18, for the May 21 TAG meeting. You can email PDF files of the TAC application, site plan changes, and building elevations to all of the TAG members, but also ask if they need paper copies. A list of contact info far the TAG members can be found online at: http://www.ci.carmel.in.us/services/DOCSITAG2008fTAG%20members% 20revised%2004.01 200B.pdt. lLyou think vou can get the mass ernail and attachments sent Qui tomorrow or Thursdav. Staff mav be able to place ypur item on the Apri/16 TAC aaenda, which is finalized/distributed this Fridav. (Please note that the City Engineering Dep't is okay with the changes, provided that no part ot the median is in the road right of way and the change will not require a wider curb cut than previously approved.) Regarding the Qroposed signage changes: Rachel Boone will contact you with what signage is permitted for this development, and she will provide options tor signage approval. Angie Conn, Planning Administrator Dept. of Community Services - Planning & Zoning 1 Civic Square, 3rd Floor City of Carmel, IN 46032 p.317-571-2417 f.317-571-2426 aconn@carmel.in.gov 4/112008 ~ ICEMILLERLLP LEGAL COUNSEL November 28, 2007 WIlI'IEII.'S DIItECT NUMBBR: (317) 236-2124 DIRECT FAX: (311) 592-4603 INTI:Rl'IET; ~AWP.EHCE.HAFETZ@ICEMILLER,COM i ! I , Via Email and U.S. Mail Ms. Angelina COlm Planning Administrator Department of Community. Services - Planning & Zoning City of Carmel I Civic Square, Third Floor Carmel, IN 46032 RE: 116111 Street Centre Planned Unit Development ("PUW') - Final Development Plan Dear Ms. Conn: As indicated in your email and pursuant to a recent meeting among Mike Hollibaugh, Greg Small, Mark Zukerman and Zeff Weiss regarding the ahove-referenced POO, we submit this'letter on behalf of 1 16th Street Centre II, LLC requesting approval of a Final Development Plan for the PUD, as defined in the PUD Ordinance No. Z-484~05 (the "Ordinance"). Attached to this letter are: (1) the Ordinance (with exhibits), as originally approved; and (2) a revised site plan for the PUD, discussed below. The original Ordinance, along with the revised site plan. comprise the proposed Final. Development Plan for the project. The original Ordinance was adopted by the Common Council of the City of Carmel on November 21,2005. Induded with the approved Ordinance was an approved Conceptual Plan for the project, defined in the Ordinance, and an original site plan. Section 5 of the Ordinance set forth the procedures for Final Development Plan approval for the project and provides, in part, that the Director shall have sole and exclusive authority to approve the Final DeveLopment Plan for the PUD. This letter is submitted pursuant to Section 5 ofthe Ordinance. The revised site plan attached to this letter makes three minor changes to the original site plan. First, the revised site plan shows a median at the southern most access point to the development from College Avenue, which structure was not previously shown on the site plan. Second, the revised site plan shows the L-shaped building on the corner of 1 16th Street and College A venue as separated into two structures, where the original site plan showed this structure as one, undivided structure, Third, the revised site plan includes a new structure on 116th Street, east of the L-shaped structure, where the original site plan referred to this area as an "outlot." One American Square I Suite 3100 I Indianapolis, IN 46282-0200 I P 317-236.2100 I F 317-236-2219 INOIANAPOlIS I CHICAGO I DUPAGE COUNTY IL I WASHINGTON DC www.icemiller.tom Ms. Angelina Conn November 28, 2007 Page 2 For your convenience, we have highlighted the three changes to the site plan on the I attachment to this letter. We believe these changes to the site plan should qualify as IIMinar Alterations" under the PUD and should therefore be entitled to review and approval solely by the Director. See Section 5.l{A) of the Ordinance. Moreover, as discussed in the recent meeting, because the proposed structure on the "outlot" will have substantially similar elevations and exteriors as the other structures in the PUD, we believe this change to the site plan should also be approved by the Director alone and should not be. subject to the Architectural Design, Exterior Lighting, Landscaping and Signage ("ADLS") process. Accordingly, the approval of this entire Final Development Plan, in our view, is solely within the discretion of the Director. I look forward to working with you in the processing the approval of this Final Development Plan. Should you have any questions or comments, or need any further information, please do not hesitate to contact me at the above telephone number or email address. Very truly yours, ICE MILLER LLP tfJ( LLH:anl Cc: .Mr. Greg Small Mr. Glen Meinecke Mr. Mark Zukerman Zeff Weiss Enclosures Page 1 of2 Conn, Angelina V '-~'-"""'~""";"":-c"""".,_,____~__"""_,~,~_"""".,,-,_"~,,,,,,,,~~,,_,,,,, ~~~""~'~""'~'--~"----"-~-""-'--'~""~'-'-~-'o- C5L ,,~Ou . 7~~c9 (l \) \^" From: Conn, Angelina V Sent: Wednesday, November 28,2007 12:34 PM To: 'Hafetz, Larry' Subject: RE: 116th Street Centre PUD - Final Development Plan. Z.484-05 Attachments: PC-2005-oct18.rtf Larry - in researching this project further, I came across this statement, possibly made by Zeff, at the October 18. 2005 plan commission meeting, regarding the out lot. See the highlighted text below: "Zeff Weis repurted that this item came o.ut of Special Studies Committee with a 4.0 positive recommendation for approval. Following COlllmittee revieM'. the DOCS had further ideas hased on comments from the Mayor. The petitioner worked with Les Olds. Director of Redevelopment. in order to incorporate items that would be mutually heneficial. ...In addition to the connectivity, there was concern at the Committee meeting regarding the out-lots Whatever is developed on the out-lots would have to come hack before the Cummission for approval. The landscape plan has een approved through DOCS. The petitioner is also seeking approvalfor a monument sign depicted in the informational materials (tab J J.) At this time, the petitioner is asking for approval olthe ADLS and favorable recommendation of the rezone, " Larry, Staff was hoping to approve the proposed changes administratively, but this statement made before the Plan Commission, by one of the project's representatives, ties our hands. Perhaps, we can send the site plan amendments to TAC (Technical Advisory Committee) and a subcommittee of the plan commission, instead of the full commission, for approval. This would not involve a public hearing or public notice. We can discuss this further. Also, look at Chapter 2.1 a.A of the PUD ordinance Z-484-05. Parking is only allowed at the rear of buildings. In addition, chapter 2.1 G.D requires 43.6 parking spaces for this proposed 12,000 s.f. building. You will have to provide Staff with a parking breakdown chart for the whole site to show that it meets the parking requirements. For this new building, I only counted 37 new parking spaces. You may need variance approval for the reduced number of parking spaces... DOCS will also need a revised landscape plan. Scott Brewer, City Forester, will also have to review/approve the revised landscape plan. Angie Conn, Planning Administrator Dept. of Community Services - Planning & Zoning 1 Civic Squar~, 3rd Floor City of Carmel, IN 46032 p. 317~571'2417 f. 317-571-2426 <lCOnn@cBnnel.in.gov ,/ ,\'" \lv\" v t~~\D . From: Hafetz, Larry [mailto:Larry.Hafetz@rcemiller.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 10:44 AM To: Conn, Angelina V Cc: gsmall@equicor.com; gmeinecke@equkor.com; mzukerman@equicor.com; Weiss, Zeff A. Subject: 116th Street Centre PUD - Final Development Plan Angie - As I mentioned, attached is our letter. with two attachments, seeking approval of the Final Development Plan for the 116th Street Centre PUD. You will also be receiving a hard copy of the letter with attachments by mail. If you have any questions about the letter or our request, feel free to give me a call. Thanks very much for your help on this matter. Larry " 4/1/2008 Page 10f3 Conn, Angeliha V .""n'_"""~.~.",_.~"~.~.____..".,.,...,-"."""",",~'_~~.,~_.,,,~~~_.._ ....,.....". "''''''~'"''-~'''''';'''''"'-'_'_'_'~~~_""",^O'~"",^",",,""~'m."~_'.u"..,'~' __ From: Conn, Angelina V Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 1 :45 PM To: 'Hafetz, Larry' Cc: Hollibaugh, Mike P Subject: RE: 116th Street Centre PUD - Final Development Plan - Z-484-05 Larry ~ After reading everyone's emails, I am having further discussion wilh Mike Hollibaugh about this approval process and which route to take, However, in doing further research, I found that Zeft told the subcommittee that lhe outlot development would appear before the commission as an ADLS, in an excerpt from Sept. 6,2005 special studies committee meeting minutes: ...Madeleine Torresqu,estiol/ed theollllot area-bl(iIt at afitluredate? ZeffWeiss responded that the petitioner will return to the COlllmissiollfor ADUhvhel/ the outlots are brought fO/1Hml, a/ld that Ivill include the parking. There is a littleflexibilit)! 10 address both holV these are carved up as wefl as parking when lire spec!f1c llse is known. The oullot users VIii!! have their own parking area..., Angie Conn, Planning Administrator Dept. of COlllmunity Services - Planning & Zoning 1 Civic Square. 3rd Floor City of Carmel, IN 46032 p.317-571-2417 f.317-571-2426 aconn@carmel.in.gov --'~"_.'~"-<-'-'~-~"-'."-' ". _.~,._~~-~~,-,~-~.~~..~",.,~..,-^.".~~..._-,~.,-_.- From: Hafetz, Larry [mailto:Larry.Hafetz@itemiller,com] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 5:09 PM To: Conn, Angelina V Cc: gsmall@equicor.com; gmeinecke@equicor.com; mzukerman@equicor.com; Weiss, Zeff A. Subject: RE: 116th Street Centre PUD - Final Development Plan - Z-484-05 Angie - I spoke to Zeffabout your comments and your assessment of the oul-Iot issue is correct. However, the discussion you cited from the plan commission rneetlng vlias in tl1e context of developing some form of a drive-thru on the out-lot, such as a Stal~bucks. We now know, however, that the improvements on the out-lot will not include a drive-thru, and will be consistent with the desi'gn of the other structures in the PUD. Based on our discussions with Mike Hollibaugh, we thought that adrninistrative approval for tl1is lype of structure would be appropriate. In any event if you believe that furtf1er CommisSion review is necessary, we cerialnly would prefer to go through the TAC process as you mention.. Let's disclIss this further when you have a minute Also. I will get back to you on the parking issue for the out-lot, and the revised landscaping plan. Thanks for your quick response on our letter. Larry Lawrence L. Hafetz Ice Miller LLP Attorney at Law Phone (317)236-2124 Fax (317) 592-4603 Email: lawlencehafetz@icernillercom 111:29/2007 Page 1 of2 Ct:m'n, Angelina V From: o-uncan, Gary R Serit: Friday, November 30, 2007 8:04 AM To: Conn, Angelina V Subject: RE: 116th Street Centre PUD - Final Development Plan Angie, I have no issues with the change provided that no part of the median is in the right-af-way and the change will not require a wider curb cut than previously approved, Thanks so much, Gary Gary R Duncan Jr., P.E. Assistant City Engineer City of-Carmel Depart111ent of Engineering One Civic Square Cannel, Indiana 46032 (317) 571-2441 (317) 571-2439 (fax) gdu'ncan@canncl.in.gov --~--Origirial Message----- From: Conn, Angelina V Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 11:38 To:' Duncan, Gary R Subject: FW: 116th Street Centre PUD - Final DeVelopment Plan Hi Gary: Please se'e attached letter and Attachment 2 With yellow highlighted areas, Are you okay with this proposed median at the eri'try drive? If so, I am going to try and administratively approve these minor changes, so they do not have to go before the plan commission for approval. Thanks, Angie Con n, Planning Adininistrator De'pt, of C'ommunity Services - Planning & Zoning 1 Civic Square; 3rd Floor City of Carmel, IN 46032 p,317"571-2417 f.317-571"2426 aconn@carmel,in,gov from: Hafetz, Larry [mailto:Larry:Hafetz@icemiller.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 28,2007 10:44 AM To: Conn, Angelina V Cc: gsmall@equicor.com; gmeinecke@equicor.comi rhzukerman@equicor.com; Weiss, Zeft A. Subject: 116th Street Centre PUD - Final Development Plan Angie - As I mentioned, attached is our letter, with two attachments, seeking approval of the Final Development Plan for the 116th 11130/2007 Message Page ] of 3 .... " Conn, Angelina V From: Wei~s, Zeff A. [Zeff.Weiss@icemiller.com] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 8:53 AM To: Glen Meinecke; Hafetz, Larry; Conn, Angelina V Cc: Greg Small; Mark Zukerman Subject: RE: 116th Street Centre PUD - Final Development Plan - Z-484-05 Jus! to clarify, we are being asked to go through TAC based upon the statements made at the original PUD hearing. I am okay with that and believe it is consistent with our commitment. Angie is proposing to allow us to go to T AC as a shari cut due to our proposal to construct a similar building on the out lot instead ofa typical out lot structure. We will follow up with Angie to confirm that what we have submitted is adequate. Sorry for any confusion from our end. Regards, Zeff Zeff A. Weiss Ice Miller LLP One American Square Suite 3100 Indianapolis, IN 46282-0200 (317) 236-2319 (direct dial) (317) 592-4788 (direct fax) zeff. weiss@ icerniller.com -----Original Messagem-- From: Glen Meinecke [mailto:Gmeinecke@equicor.com] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 8:43 AM To: Glen Meinecke; Hafetz, La(ry; Conn, Angelina V Cc: Greg Small; Mark Zukerman; Weiss, Zeff A. Subject: RE: 116th Street Centre PUD - Final Development Plan - Z-484-05 Sorry. I hit the send button too early. My question centers on how much detail is needed for the site plan and building plan? Will a full scale drawing be required or can we use the information presented 10 Angie thus far. I am unclear on what is required and how involved the process might be.. From: Glen Meinecke Sent: Thursday, November 29, 20078:38 AM To: 'Hafetz, Larry'; Conn, Angelina V Cc: Greg Small; Mark Zukerman; Weiss, Zeff A. Subject: RE: 116th Street Centre PUD - Final Development Plan - Z-484-05 Zeff, Can you work around this to speed, up the process or should we give in and go through process? I prefer your original idea that it is unnecessary to go back to committee. from: Hafetz, Larry [mailto:Larry.Hafetz@icemiller.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 28,20075:09 PM 11/2912007 Message Page 2. of 3 11..-- To: Conn, Angelina V Cc: Greg Small; Glen Meinecke; Mark Zukerman; Weiss, Zeff A. Subject: RE: 116th Street Centre PUD - Final Development Plan - Z-484-0S Angie - I spoke to Zeft about your comments and your assessment of the out-lot issue is correct However, the discussion you cited from the plan commission meeting was in the context of developing some form of a drivEHhru on the out- lot, such as a Starbucks. We now know, however, that the improvements on the out-lot will not incl ude a d rive-thru, and will be consistent with the design of the other structures in the PUD. Based on our discussions with Mike Hollibaugh, we thought that administrative approval for this type of structure would be appropriate. In any event, if you believe that further Commission review is necessary, we certainly would prefer to go through the TAC process as you mention. Let's discuss this further when you have a minute. Also, I will get back to you on the parking issue for the out-lot, and the revised landscaping plan, Thanks for your quick response on our letter. Larry Lawrence L. Hafetz Ice Miller LLP Attorney at Law Phone (317) 236c2124 Fax (317) 592-4603 Email: lawrence.hafetz@icemiller.com From: Conn, Angelina V [mailto:Aconn@carmel.in.gov] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 12:34 PM To: Hafetz, Larry Subject: RE: 116th Street Centre PUD - Final Development Plan - Z-484-05 Larry - in researching this project further, I came across this statement, possibly made by Zeft, at the October 18, 2005 plan commission meeting, regarding the out lot. See the highlighted text below: "ZeffWeis reported thatthisitem came out of Special Studies Committee with a.4-0 positive recommendation for approval. Fallowing Committee revicw, the 'DOCS had/lu/her ideas based on comments from the Mayor. The petitioner IVorked with Les Olds, Director of Redevelopment, in order to incorporate items that would he mutually beneficial. .. . ..In addition to the connectivity. there 11IaS concern at the Committee r/leeting regarding the out-lots. Whatever is developed on the out-lots would have to corne back before the Conunissionfor approval. The lahdscape plan has been approved through DOCS. The petitioner is also seeking approvalfor a monumemsign depicted in the informational materials (lab 11.) At this time, the petitioner is asking for approval of the ADLS and favorable recommendation of the rezone. " Larry, Staff was hoping to approve the proposed changes administratively, but this statement made before the Plan Commission, by one of the projecfs representatives, ties our hands. Perhaps, we can send the site plan amendments to T AC (Technical Advisory Committee) and a subcommittee of the plan commission, instead of the full commission, for approval. This would not involve a public hearing or public notice. We can disclIss this further. 11/29/2007 Message Page 3 of 3 -0 Also, look at Chapter 2.1 a.A of the PU D ordinance Z-484-05. Parking is only allowed at the rear of buildings. In addition, chapter 2.1 O.D requires 43.6 parking spaces for this proposed 12,000 sJ. building. You will have to provide Staff with a parking breakdown chart for the whole site to show that it meets the parking requirements. For this new building, I only counted 37 new parking spaces. You may need variance approval for the reduced number of parking spaces... DOCS will also need a revised landscape plan. Scott Brewer, City Forester, will also have to review/approve the revised landscape plan. Angie Conn, Planning Administrator Dept. of Community Services - Planning & Zoning 1 Civic Square, 3rd Floor City of Carmel, IN 46032 p.317-571-2417 f. 317-571-2426 aCOll1l @carmel.ill.gov From: Hafetz, Larry (mailto:Larry.Hafetz@icemiller.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 10:44 AM To: Conn, Angelina V Cc: gsmall@equicor.com; gmeinecke@equicor.com; mzukerman@equicor.com; Weiss, Zeff A. Subject: 116th Street Centre PUD - Final Development Plan Angie - As I mentioned, attached is our letter, with two attachments, seeking approval of the Final Development Plan for the 116th Street Centre PUD. You will also be receiving a hard copy of the letter with attachments by mail. If you have any questions about the letter or our request, feel free to give me a call. Thanks very much for your help on this matter. Larry Lawrence L. Hafetz Ice Miller LLP Attorney at Law Phone (317) 236-2124 Fax (317) 592-4603 Email: lawrence.hafetz@icemiller.com 11/29/2007 '~ Docket N()~ 05050'003 Z, Fortune Rezone was Continued to a special meeting ofthe Special Studies Committee to be held on Thursday, September 29, 200S at 6:00 PM. -k9. Docket No. 05060040 Z and 05060041 ADLS: 116th aild College pun The applicant seeks to rezone 12.4 acres from R lIResidential and B6/Business to POO/Planned Unit Development for the purpose of creating a mixed use development comprised oftownhol11e, retail, and office uses. The site is located at NE comer of 116th Street and College Ave. Filed by Timothy OchsofIce Miller for Equicor Development Irtc. ZeffWeiss, attorney with Ice Miller appeared before the Committee representing the apphcant. Also in attendance: Greg Small and Mark Zuckennan, principals of Equicor, Tom Jolley, Don Guinnup, Engineer. The petitioner is proposingapproxil11ately 60 tow'nhomes on 12.4 acres with a common access to 1161h Street as well as CollegeAvenue. Since the initial site plan, parking is now provided along College Avenue, similar to that seen in Clay TelTace-a lane into the parking area and diagonal parking. The access off 1161h Street will serve the residential as well as the townhol11e cOllllmmity located to the northeast; there Will also be access onto Guilford. The petitioner wi\] provide for an extension ofthe intemal road across the property that will wrap around and into the other development. The petitioner will try to continue the aesthetics approved by the Commission in connection with 116tl1 Street and Guilford project. Depattment Report, Matt Griffin. This project is very much in line with future land use plan for the area. This project is in addition to the approved Townehomes at Guilford and this can be a very viable, semi-urban node. Access and on-street parking are provided and it seems as if all pieces of the puzzle exist, we are just trying to finesse them into a more successful project. There are a few outstanding items. Pedestrian circulation is still in discussion, on-street parking -some parking has been accommodated on College A vemie. As shown, the parking does not meet the Ordinance but this proposal is for aPUD and as such, there is some flexibility with how the parking is acconmlOdated. It would be important to know what use the outlot would transition into so that we are sure what the parking can accommodate. There is some parallel parking along internal streets. We have an opportunity now to make sure this project has ample parking. Conm1ittee Comments: Jerry Chomanczuk said that parking is a key item, especially behind the townhomes. There is parking on both sides of the entry for business and retail. It needs to be spelled out, though, where is the parking short, and how short is the parking? The petitioner stated that a lot of outdoor seating has been added to this project. Previously, the majority of entryways were designed to come in off the sidewalk, street, etc. That is why there are the benches and plants, etc. Madeleine Torres commeilted about parallel parking on CoIlege Avenue and thought that would be a mistake. Madeleine would rather see the diagonal parking-so would the Department; the petitioner said that space would be a detennining factor. S :/PlanCommissionlSpecial S tudi esConmlitteelM inutes1200 5/pe-ss2 00 5 septO 6 9 ~ .Teny Chomanczok asked about public notice to Meridian Technology Park. There are certain covenants and restrictions that apply. The Meridian Technology Park Association probably would have made fueluembers ofthe Association fully aware of what was going on and how it would impact the Association. J eITy asked the petitioner to check and see if there were any further requirements required of Teclmology Center Association with other members. ZeffWeiss answered in the positive. Meridian Technology Park Association had to consent to carving out the parcel, but'Zeffwoltld double-check. J eITY Chomanczuk also asked the petitioner to strongly consider the walkways and to what extent and how far they are going. There seems to be an emphasis here with cars and parking lots, but less than 100 yards from the northern-most point, Conseco has abuilding with over 600 employees who would love to be able to walk during lunch or throllghout the day. We are only talking about perhaps another 80 yards of walkway, but that requires cooperation and consideration with Meridian Technology Park. It would be of benefit not only to the City but also to the retail efforts. Steve Stromquist asked about the west retention pond and said it seems out of place. Steve suggested putting it up in the comer. Zeff Weiss responded thatthe retention has been somewhat of a challenge on this site. The petitioner is trying to landscape around it, dress it up, etc. Weare trying to be sensitive to it. Ultimately, it is the way the land drains to the east. Madeleine Torres questioned the outlot area-built at a future date? ZeffWeiss responded that the petitioner will retum to the Commission for ADLS when the outlots are brought forward, and that will include the parking. There is a little flexibility to address both how these are carved up as well as parking when the specific use is known. The outlot users will have their own parking area. No Public Remonstrance Additional Department Comments, Matt Griffin. There is a little design work to be done; walkways, parking, etc. Jerry Chonianczuk wanted to see a commitment from the City regarding the parking. Jerry suggested that the petitioner retum to the special meeting of the Committee now scheduled for September 29th. ZeffWeiss responded that there are 120 parking spaces inside the units, 120 in the driveways. In addition, there are 38 guest parking spaces. Also, the petitioner was considering a stamped, concrete walkway and thjs should probably have been shown on the site plan. Zeff Weiss said he would double-check with Mike Wells to see ifhe has addressed the residents in Technology Park. Steve Stromquist made formal motion to forward Docket No. 0506..:0040 Z and 05060041 ADLS, S :/F lanCommissio pee ialStud i e sConuni ttee/Minutes/2 00 5/pc-ss2 005 sept06 1'1- Iv -LG05 10 ........-.,. ADLS, 11 6th and College PUD to the full Commission with a favorable recommendation, seconded by Madeleine Torres, APPROVED 4-0. 10. Docket No. 05060042 DP Ainend/ADLS: Carmel Science and Technology Park, Blk 11 The applicant seeks approval for a medical office building. The site is located at the SW comer ofCanne1 Dr. and Guilford Rd. and is zoned M- 3/Manufacturing. Filed by Mary Solada of Bingham McHale. Mary Solada, attomey with Bingham McHale appeared before the Committee' representing the applicant. Also in attendance: Russ Boyer, project manager for Bremner & Wiley, Bob Doster, Schneider Engineering, and Dan Gmbert, CSO Architects. The petitioner is seeking approval for a medical office building at the southwest comer of Cannel Drive and Guilford Road. The property is zoned M-3/Manufacturing and is within the Carmel Science and Technology Park, Block 11. The initial site plan has been revised to provide for a smaller building, (primari Iy masonry) reduced by approximately 10,000 square feet, and the orientation of the building has been pivoted more to the east and actually works better on the site and provides more of a front entrance facing Carmel Drive. Regarding the pedestrian circulation around the site, the project team has met with the City Engineer and the Assistant City Engineer. The petitioner is willing to cooperate with the City Engineer's office as to their desire-sidewalk or a multi-use asphalt, walking path. In temts of vehicular circulation, the intersection of Carmel Drive and Guilford is slated for some major reconfiguration in 2006. One ofthe requirements of the City Engineer's office and the Department is necessalY right-of-way dedication as wen as some usage of the pond to accommodate those intersection improvements. The petitioner is actually intending to purchase the pond and it would be used for site drainage. Full access points onto Guilford are plalmed with a right-in/right-outonly on 1221ld Street. The access on Carniel Drive has been explicitly discussed with the City Engineer's office and Mr. McBride has no objection and is actually in suppoli. The access point is clear of the planned medians that come down Carmel Drive and there is ability for full access. Currently, there are two variances proposed for signage for this site that are to be heard at the September 26th BZA meeting. The variance would be to allow two wall signs on the same elevation and for a directory sign to be one foot higher than permitted. At the moment, the planned use for this propeliy is mixed retail, perhaps a bank and a restaurant, small shops etc. Department Comments, Matt Grifin. Signage on the future lot really centers around how the land is S :/PlanCommi.ssionlSpecialStudiesCommitteelMinutes/2 00 5/pc-ss200 5 septOG 11