Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
00001756
Hamilton Co., IN - Online Reports Page 1 of I Parcel Information Report 1. report type 2. property se Inch 3. view reports ar �...... new search I general parcel into. priStatement taz payments property card fall tax statement Disclaimer. The information available through this program is current as of 2/7/2008. program allows you to view and print certain public records. Each report reflects information as of a specific date; so the information. wt reports may not match. All information has been derived from public records that are constantly undergoing change and Is not warranted for "acy. It may not reflect the Current information pertaining to the property of interest. Parcel No: 16-10-31-00-00-001.000 i „ Q 7ti G; Property Address: 0 126th St E CARMEL, IN 46032 Deeded Owner: Mohawk Housing Partners LLC Owner Address: 333 Pennsylvania N 10th Fir INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204 Legal Description: 10,30,178 308-250 A 1i6/82 329-249 4/4i97 FR RAYMOND EQUITIES 9712612 SectioniTownship/Range: 31/ 18iO4 Subdivision Name: Block: Deeded Acres: S Political Township: Clay Lot Number(s): Most Recent Recorded Date: 8/4/2004 (Recorded Date might be due to a variety of changes; such as annexation, right-of-way, split, or deed.) This application is developed and maintained by the Information System Services Department. If you have any questions or comments, please contact I © 2005 Hamilton Co. Website Suaaestions_or Issues I Chell tiOns of Use I Privacy Policy I Site Map I Technical Help I HOME ® 2006, Hamilton County, Indiana - all rights reserved. http://www.co.hamilton.in.uslappslrepottslrptparcelinfb.asp?sparcetno=161031000000100... 2/20/2008 Burned -out building worries Mohawk tenants A vacant apartment building damaged by fire in July is drawing concerns from residents about the potential for crime and safety hazards. Officials from Buckingham Companies, which has owned the Mohawk Hills Apartments since 2004, said they cant take action until completing negotiations with the insurance company. "It's certainly not a Buckingham issue," company spokesman Clyde Lee said Tuesday. "Its an insurance issue at this point." The fire was caused by a Mohawk Hills resident setting off fireworks at the building near 126th Street and Keystone Avenue. The fire displaced 13 families and caused more than $1 million in damage. The building, like all others in the complex, eventually is to be tom pzoom down to make way for Gramercy, a development of residences, Damaged by a July fire, the offices, retail shops. a parking garage and a hotel that will be built burned -out remains of this over the next 10 years. That project, set to begin in the spring, now Mohawk Hills structure remain. has no timetable in part because of the national housing slump. Residents call the Lure boarded -up What remains after the fire is a mostly boarded -up building with a apartment building an eyesore, blackened framework exposed in the middle section. and worry it will attract "Every time I look at that building, it concerns me," said Curtis trespassers. - James attract /The Jarvis, 67, who has lived in the adjacent building since December. Star "it really is an eyesore. Everybody that comes here to visit says, What's happening with that building?'" Other residents worry the vacant building could attract trespassers, and the building conditions could pose safety hazards. "Carmel is considered to be upper class, and they just allow this building to stand?" said Jackie Ekovich, 22, who moved into Mohawk shortly after the fire. Kevin Brennan, a code enforcement officer with Carmel, said he's visited the complex several limes and has not seen anything that has alarmed him in terms of safety. He said Buckingham took precautions to secure the site by boarding up the windows and padlocking doors and said the city has not received any complaints about it. "If we feel that the situation is compromising the safety of the public, then its time for us to step in and order compliance from the property owner," Brennan said, adding that the situation is not to that point yet. Danyel Boersma, 29, perceives the building as a safety hazard. She said she's seen people lingering around the vacant building and has called the police twice to report it Boersma, who has lived in the complex for three years, said this is one example of how conditions at the apartments have deteriorated since Gramercy was approved in 2006. Other issues, such as lack of lighting, make her feel unsafe while walking her dog around the apartments at night. "Now that they're going to be (building Gramercy), they just neglect it," Boersma said. 'They don't care if people leave." Lee said Buckingham has spent $1.5 million in renovations on the complex since it took over three years ago and currently has 10 outstanding maintenance tickets in the 564-unit complex. The company employs someone to patrol the site, he said, and management checks on the site several times daily. Buckingham would like to tear down the building as soon as possible, Lee said, but they're working out cost estimates with the insurance company and awaiting a recommendation about whether to rebuild or tear it down. Mike Bill, chief executive of MJ Insurance, said the company is close to settling the claim. Call Star reporter Francesca Jarosz at (317) 444-5527. No Text ILT = Wiwi� »N i »N i � TIE i I v e..� �! ✓ • -. _ � � � � � � "� E'y! �.' __- o ., �ft104 1. \r \W.1 fit V1 r i -91 � JI z,� F