Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplications r ., CJ .' T ' , - ~..... W" . . . ':. CITY OF CARMEL. CLAY TOWNSHIP , ;'-. /<</;t. ~- HAMILTON COUNTY. INDIANA />>' f? ~ APPLICATION FOR BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ACTi~~ /Jret:"Z?'fo \",_, /) 4. ,(}P ,'.' uOLS \/', .\\' \--- , . SPECIAL USE APPROVAL REQUEST 1- ; , ., Fee $630.00 \; / ,",. I,~ '," . DOCKET NO. DATE RECEIVED: 1 ) Applicant: Carmel Clay Schools Address: 5201 East 131st Street, Carmel, IN 46033 2) Project Name: Freshman Center, Carmel High School Engineer/Architect: Fanning/Howey Associates, Inc, Attorney: David Day of Church. Church, Hittle & Antrim Phone: (317) 844-4948 Phone; (317) 848-0966 . Phone: (317) 773-5320 3) Applicant's Status: (Check the appropriate response) x (al The applicant's name is on the deed to the property (b) The applicant is the contract purchaser of the property (c) Other: 4) If Item 3) (c) is checked, please complete the following: Owner of the property involved: Owner's address: Phone: 5) Record of Ownership: Deed book No.llnstrument No. Page: Purchase Date: 6) Common address of the property involved: 520 East Main Street, Carmel, Indiana Legal description: See Attached for Legal Description, including purchased properties. Tax Map Parcel No.: 161030000007000,161030010503000,1610300105002000 and others 7") State explanation of requested Special See Attached 8) State reasons supporting the Special Use: (Additionally, complete the attached question sheet entitled "Findings of Fact-Special Use"). See Attached ;:;1-Pn.a ~ r-.~ FI _ !=;,",:l~b:!'] ic::p ArH"lllr~Hl"ln u u APPLICATION FOR BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ACTION SPECIAL USE APPROVAL REQUEST 7. State Explanation of Requested Special: Carmel Clay Schools wishes to make additions, totaling 173,000 square feet, to the existing Carmel High School building and campus in order to support .a Freshman Center on the school campus. The additions will support an additional 1,200 ninth grade students. This will provide additional capacity within the existing High School for grades 1 0 through 12. These additions will support the anticipated student growth based on the recent demographic projections. . 8. The continued growth of Carmel and Clay Township continues to increase the student population served by Carmel Clay Schools. Projections have indicated that the existing Carmel High School would no.t support the increased student enrollment by 2005. Through a series of public hearings and steering committees, a recommendation was presented to the Carmel Clay School Board of Education to construct a Freshman Center on the existing High School site in order to accommodate the projected enrollment capacity and maintain a single high school for the community. The Freshman Center concept was also recommended to prOVide a smaller more self-contained educational environment for the freshman students transitioning from junior high school to high school. After further studies by the Administration, staff, and design professionals the Freshman Center' became two additions to the existing High School facility, incorporating the self-contained environment concept while still allowing easy utilization of the facilities within the existing high school as needed by students. Additional property has been purchased by Carmel CIEj.y Schools to facilitate the major portion of the Freshman Center addition on the northwest side of the building. This additional property provides space to reconfigure vehicular circulation, provide additional parking, and provide a larger buffer between the school building and the adjacent residential properties. This Project also proposes to eliminate the roadway connection between the High School campus and the residential subdivision, Carmelwood. This will eliminate school traffic within the adjacent neighborhood, a major concern of the adjacent property owners. The new additions will blend into the existing architecture of Carmel High School and use similar exterior materials. Some design elements will be modified to signify the difference between the Freshman Center and the remainder of the building. The reconfigured roads will help eliminate or reduce school vehicular traffic on the surrounding public roads. An additional student drop-off location at the Freshman Center entrance will reduce the amount of vehicles-waiting at the main entrance along Main Street. Other site modifications will allow bus traffic to be split between the west side and north side of the campus. An enlarged student walkway will allow students to walk from the student parking area north of Smokey Row Road while keeping the vehicle drive open for bus and car traffic. u u 9) Present zoning of the property (give exact classification): R-2 10) Present use of the property: High School and Residential 11 ) 12) acres Freshman Center and high school for grades 9-12 13) Is the property: Owner occupied X Renter occupied Other 14) Are there any restrictions, laws, covenants, variances, special uses, or appeals filed in connection with this property that would relate or affect its use for the specific purpose of this application? If yes, give date and docket number, decision rendered and pertinent explanation. 15) Has work for which this application is being filed already started? If answer is yes, give details: Building Permit Number: Builder: 16) If proposed special use is granted, when will the work commence? May 2003 17) If the proposed special use IS granted, who will operate and/or use the proposed improvement for which this application has been filed? Carmel Clay Schools NOTE: LEGAL NOTICE shall be published in the Noblesville Daily Ledqer a MANDATORY twenty-five (25) days prior to the public hearing date" The certified "Proof of Publication" affidavrt for the newspaper must be available for inspection the night of the hearing. LEGAL NOTICE to all adjoining and abutting property owners is also MANDATORY, two methods of notice are recommended: 1) CERTIFIED ~AIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED sent to adjoining property owners. (The white receipt should be stamped by the Post Office at least wenty-five (25) days prior to the public hearing date,) 2) HAND DELIVERED to adjoining and abutting prope,iy owners (A receipt signed by the adjoIning and abutting property owner acknowledgir,g the n.venty-five (25) day notice should be kept for verification that the notice was 'completed) REA.L1ZE THE BURDEN OF PROOF FOR ALL NOTICES IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT. AGAIN, THIS TASK IvlUST BE COMPLETED AT LEAST T'vVENTY-FIVE (25) DAYS PRlOR TO PUBLIC HEARING DATE. :;;aga 2 of &.. Speciaf Use App~ication u u OVERALL LAND DESCRIPTION Part of the North Half of Section 30 Township 18 North Range 4 East, Hamilton County, Indiana, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of the East Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section; thence South 89028'10" West along the South line thereof 168.60 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 00044'10" West 609.30 feet; thence North 30055'50" East 629.70 feet; thence North 11039'50" East 690.74 feet; thence North 79053'18" West 39.46 feet; thence North 01030' 19" West 813.14 feet to the North line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section; thence along said North line South 89032'49" West 209.92 feet to the Northeast corner of said Northwest Quarter Section; thence along the North line thereof South 89031'05" West 111.76 feet; thence South 00037'29" East 535.00 feet to the center of Cool Creek; thence North 64016'02" West along said centerline 111.61 feet; thence North 00037'29" West 485.70 feet to the North line of said Northwest Quarter Section; thence South 89031'05" West 624.70 feet; thence South 01056'58" West 616.85 feet; thence South 80037'29" East 158.81 feet; thence South 00037'29" East along the East line of Carmelwood subdivision extended as recorded in Deed Record 136, Pages 365- 366 a distance of 808.20 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 4 of said Carmelwood subdivision; thence South 89022'31" West along the North line thereof 101.50 feet to the Northwest corner thereof; thence South 75013'52" West 51.81 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 8 of said Carmelwood subdivision; thence South 89022'31" West along the North line thereof 235.28 feet (228.5 feet - plat) to the Northwest corner thereof; thence South 14025'31" West along the West line of said Lot 8 and the extension thereof 117.38 feet to the North line of Lot 17 of said Carmelwood subdivision; thence Southwesterly along a curve to the left and along the North line of said Lot 17 a distance of 41.97 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 17; said curve having a radius of 113.00 feet and being subtended by a chord bearing South 75059'01" West a distance of 41.73 feet; thence South 00012'29" East along the West line of said Lot 17 a distance of 165.34 feet to the North line of property described in Warranty Deed Instrument No. 99-09901285; thence South 89022'31" West along said North line 200.70 feet to the West line of the East half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 30 T ownsh ip 18 North Range 4 East; thence South 00037'29" East along said West line 582.00 feet; thence South 89028' 1 0" West 212.16 feet; thence South 00037'29" East 307.00 feet to the South line of said Northwest Quarter Section; thence along said South line North 89028'10" East 1365.74 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 65.082 acres, more or less, subject however to all legal easements and rights of way of record. ":l-;, i' u u AFFIDAVIT I, hereby swear thall am the owner/contract purchaser of property invofved in this application and that the foregoing signatures, statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, i, the undersigned, authorize the applicant to act on my behalf with regard to this application and subsequent hearings and testimony. . Signed: (Date) '2.oc-(,..U,J E. FAl1.j2.A~\::J Je. (Please Print) i STATE OF INDIANA ss: County af (,hunuL~ (Caunty in which notarization takes place) 1Jc~~~ Before me the undersigned, a NotaryPublic for _ .(Notary Pubiic'.s county af residence) County, State of Indiana, personally appeared I(())!,JG'E hrrand;Jr (Property Owner, Attorney, or Power of Attorney) and acknowledge the execution of the foregoing instrument this /!J. day of jJ8-~iu~ . ,20 () d-.- Clef' 13, ~~vrxJ_--th~ Notary Public--Signature (SEAL) Ju nIce ' B.- f/; fI1}'}7e / h~€.-be/ Notary Pub!ic--Please Print My commission CXPir.s:~ (SEAL) If ~oo '7 J U CITY OF CARMEL - CLA Y-TOWNSHIPU /' " ,. ,(../ '. ,.. . " 1 ' j. ...-..... " ~ \.l ~ - I ~. '..... Rf; ~ !J.tfl - c'/:/VJ::ro '-(; 1.1 l..u D lOU2 'Des HAMILTON COUNTY, INDIANA .' :~' 1'- , APPLICATION FOR BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ACTION ~-'-'\ - v\ DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE REQUEST \', ....-" , '<...1 .:,' - \ $630.00 for the first plus $70.00 for each additional section of the ordinance being variJd; :.:.' ~ FEE: DOCKET NO. DATE RECEIVED: 1) Applicant: Carmel Clay Schools Address: 5201 East 131st Street, Carmel, IN 46033 " \ ), \-$ \ C\ I: I ., ..' ,I "11 . I . , I _ 2) Project Name: Freshman Center, Carmel High School Engitteer/Architect: Fanning/Howey Associates: Inc. Att David Day of Church, Church, Hittle & Antrim . orney: Phone: (317) 844-4948 Phone: (317) 848-0966 Phone: (317) 773-5320 3) Applicant's Status: (Check the appropriate response) x (a) The applicant's name is on the deed to the property (b) The applicant is the contract purchaser of the property (c) Other: 4) If Item 3) (c) is checked, please complete the following: Owner of the property involved: Owner's address: Phone: 5) Record of Ownership: Deed Book No./lnstrument No. Page: Purchase date: 6) Common address of the property involved: 520 East Main Street, Carmel Indiana L. I d . t' See Attached for Legal Description. including purchased properties. ega escnp Ion: . Tax Map Parcel No.: 161030000007000, 161030010503000, 1610300105002000. and ot~ers. 7) State explanation of requested Developmental Standards Variance: (State what you want to do and cite the section number(s) of the CarmelfClay Zoning Ordinance which applies and/or creates the need for this request). See Attached. Page 1 of 8 -- De'.'e1opmenlal Slandards Vs.riance ApDlicalion u u 8) State reasons supporting the Developmental Standards Variance: (Additionally, complete the attached question sheet entitled "Findings of Fact-Developmental Standards Variance"). See Attached. 11 ) Present zoning.of the property (give exact classification): Size of lot/parcel in question: 65.082 Present use of the property: Educational, Grades 9-12 Describe the proposed use of the property: Educational, Grades 9-12 R-2 9) 10) acres 12) 13) x Is the property: Owner occupied Renter occupied Other 14) Are there any restrictions, laws, covenants, variances, special uses, or appeals filed in connection with this property that would relate or affect its use for the specific purpose of this application? If yes, give date and docket number, decision rendered and pertinent explanation. See Attached Letter of Grant, Dated November 27, 2001. 15) Has work for which this application is being filed already started? If answer is yes, give details: .JilJJ,lQLCl9J:t:llToJLNl,!mjJer: Builder: 16) If proposed appeal is granted, when will the work commence? May 2003 17) If the proposed variance is granted, who will operate and/or use the proposed improvement for which this application has been filed? Carmel Clay Schools NOTE: LEGAL NOTICE shall be published in the Noblesville Dailv Ledqer a MANDATORY twenty-five (25) days prior to the pUblic hearing date. The certified "Proof of Publication" affidavit for the newspaper must be available for inspection the night of the hearing. LEGAL NOTICE to all adjoining and abutting property owners is also MANDATORY, two methods of notice are recommended: 1) CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED sent to adjoining property owners. (The white receipt should be stamped by the Post Office at least twenty-five (25) days prior to the public hearing date.) Page 2 of a - Developr:\ental Slandar". Valiance Applicstion , u u CITY OF CARMEL -CLAY TOWNSHIP HAMILTON COUNTY, INDIANA APPLICATION FOR BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE REQUEST 7. State explanation of requested Developmental Standards Variance: (State what you want to do and city the section number(s) of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance which applies and/or creates the need for this request). Carmel Clay Schools would like to construct additions to the existing Carmel High School where the height exceeds the ordinance requirement stated in Section 8.4 of the Carmel Clay Zoning Ordinance - --:c -'-0. 8. State reasons supporting the Development Standards Variance: The size of the proposed additions is based on the projected student enrollment anticipated in the future for Carmel High School. The limitations of the Project site and desire to maintain a compact floor plan for the building additions requires a multi-story building for the main building addition. The height of the major portion of this addition is 44 feet - 0 inches, with a mechanical enclosure extending to 57 feet - 0 inches. This three-story addition is similar in height to the three-story portion of the existing building on the west side of the Carmel High School. The height of this existing portion of the building is 48 feet. The proposed addition will not be the highest building element on the high school campus. The highest building point is at the existing auditorium fly loft, approximately 66 feet above grade. The east building addition is both slightly above and lower in portions than the existing building at that location, approximately 24 feet - 6 inches. The height is required due to the music performance spac.es located within the addition. These heights are needed to maintain the acoustical performance desired in the music spaces. u u OVERALL LAND DESCRIPTION - Part of the North Half of Section 30 Township 18 North Range 4 East, Hamilton County, Indiana, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of the East Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section; thence South 89"28'10" West along the South line thereof 168.60 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 00044'10" West 609.30 feet; thence North 30055'50" East 629.70 feet; thence North 11039'50" East 690.74 feet; thence North 79053'18" West 39.46 feet; thence North _ 01030'19" West 813.14 feet to the North line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section; thence along said North iine Sou.th 89"32'49" West 209.92 feet to the Northeast corner or said Northwest Quarter Section: thence along the North line thereof South 89031'05" West 111.76 feet; thence South 00037'29" East 535,00 feet to the center of Cool Creek; thence North 64016'02" West alQng said centerline 111.61 feet; thence North 00037'29" West 485.70 feet to !he North line of said Northwest Quarter Section; thence'South 89031 '05" West 624.70 feet; thence South 01056'58" West 616.85 feet; thence South 80037'29" East 158.81 feet; thence South 00037'29" East along the East line of Carmelwood subdivision extended as recorded in Deed Record 136, Pages 365- 366 a distance of 808.20 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 4 of said Carmelwood subdivision; thence South 89022'31" West' along the North line thereof 1 01,50 feet to the Northwest corner thereof; thence South 75013'52" West 51.81 feet to the Northeast corner or Lot 8 of said Carmelwood subdivision; thence South 89022'31" West along the North line thereof 235,28 feet (228.5 feet - plat) to the Northwest corner thereof; thence South 14025'31" West along the West line of said Lot 8 and the extension thereof 117. 38 feet to the North line of Lot 17 of said Carmelwood subdivision; thence Southwesterly along a curve to the left and along the NOlih line of said Lot 17 a distance of 41.97 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 17; said curve havi~g a radius of 113.00 feet and being subtended by a chord bearing South 75059'01" West a distance of 41.73 feet; thence South 00012'29" East along the West Ii ne of said Lot 17 a distance of 165.34 feet 10 the North line of property described in Warrclnty Deed Instrument No. 99-09901285; thence South 89022'31" West along said North line 200.70 reet to the West line of the East half af the Northwest Quarter. of SeCtion 30 T ownsh ip 18 NQrth Range 4 East; thence South 00037'29" East along said West line 582.00 feet; thence South 89028'10" West 212.16 feet; thence South 00037'29" East 307.00 feet to the South line of said Northwest Quarter Section; thence along said South line North 89028'10" East 1365.74 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 65.082 acres, more or less, subject however to allleg81 easements and rights of way of record, -e u u ,~ AFFIDAVIT I, hereby swear that I am the owner/contract purchaser of property involved in this application and that the for'egoing signatures, statements and answers herein contained and the information .herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I, the undersigned, authorize the applicant to act on my behalf with' regard to this application and subsequent hearings and testimony. Signed: (2aG:L.. t ~ ~ (Property Owner, Attorney, or Power ~ Attorney) Date ~c...c..,~ 1G. +='Aa..(Z..~D 1 JfL.. (Please Print) STATE OF INDIANA ss: for .-- JJtl/J1d~ (County in which notarization takes place) ih01'ul ~YL- " Before me the undersigned, a Notary Public County of (Notary Public's county of residence) County, State of Indiana, personally appeared ~ II/It ' l::~, Fal~/(211[1 J/~ . jProQertv O...wQ!?r.Attorney, or Power of Altorn~L and acknowledge the execution of the foregoing instrument this //2 day of lkC:-u~r , 20i ()~ (SEAL) r;.4d.~.1 ':6 w{..nvn"c~Ud>-~ (I Notary Public--Signature Jon I~e.-.'B. J-Lmn~ IlLh~, Notary Public--Please Print My comm~XPireSj . ---J '~ t' t; c20() f Page 4 of B - Developmenlal Standards Variance Appllcs,;on U . CITY OF CARMEL - CLAY TOWNSHIW R f: 1}. !Jf/} - crlllED 18 200J DOCS .. ,(\ I -: '---I ' - 1:,- ~"'_, HAMILTON COUNTY, INDIANA I: . i~-1 APPLICATION FOR BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS AClilON \'~\ DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE REQUEST-(> ,!". ,- FEE: $630.00 for the first plus $70.00 for each additional section of the ordinance'beio_gvafieg.' - DOCKET NO. DATE RECEIVED: 1) Applicant: Carmel Clay Schaols Address: 5201 East 131st Street, Carmel, IN 46033 Project Name: Freshman Center, Carmel High School Engineer/Architect: Fanning/Howey Associates, Inc. Att David Day of Church, Church, Hittle & Antrim orney: Phone: (317) 844-4948 Phone: (317)848-0966 Phone: (317) 773-5320 2) 3) Applicant's Status: (Check the appropriate response) x (a) The applicant's name ,is on the deed to the property (b) The applicant is the contract purchaser of the property (c) Other: 4) If Item 3) (c) is checked, please complete the following: Owner of the property involved: Owner's address: Phone: 5) Record of Ownership: Deed Book No./lnstrument No. Page: Purchase date: 6) Common address of the property involved: 520 East Main Street, Carmel Indiana L I d . t' See Attached for Legal Description, including purchased properties. ega escnp 1on: .' Tax Map Parcel No.: 161030000007000,161030010503000, 1610300105002000, and others. 7} State explanation of requested Developmental Standards Variance: (State what you want to do and cite the section number(s) of the Carmel/Clay Zonin"g Ordinance which applies and/or creates the need for this request). See Attached, Page i of. a - Developmenlal Standards Variance ApplioaUon u u - . 8) State reasons supporting the Developmental Standards Variance: (Additionally, complete the attached question sheet entitled "Findings of Fact-Developmental Standards Variance"). See Attached. 10) Present zoning of the property (give exact classification): Size of loUparcel in question: 65.082 Present use af the property: Educational, Grades 9-12 Describe the proposed use of the property: Educational, Grades 9-12 R-2 9) acres 11) 12) 13) x Is the property: Owner occupied Renter occupied Other 14) Are there any restrictions, laws, covenants, variances, special uses, or appeals filed in connection with this property that would relate or affect its use for the specific purpose of this application? If yes, give date and docket number, decision rendered and pertinent explanation. See Attached Letter of Grant, Dated November 27,2001. 15) Has work for which this application is being filed already started? If answer is yes, give details: .~l.,litQlQgEeLlJ}it['Jumbe!: Builder: 16) If proposed appeal is granted, when will the work.commence? May 2003 17) If the proposed variance is granted, who will operate and/or use the proposed improvement for which this application has been filed? Carmel Clay Schools NOTE: LEGAL NOTICE shall be published in the Noblesville Dailv Ledqer a MANDATORY twenty-five (25) days prior to the public hearing date. The certified "Proof of Publication" affidavit for the newspaper must be available for inspection the night of the hearing. LEGAL NOTICE to all adjoining and abutting property owners is also MANDATORY, two methods of notice are recommended: 1) CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED sent to adjoining property owners. (The white receipt should be stamped by the Post Office at least twenty-five (25) days prior to the publ!c hearing date,) Page" of 8 - Developmel1tal Standards Variance Application u u CITY OF CARMEL - C LAY TOWNSHIP HAMILTON COUNTY, INDIANA APPLICATION FOR BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE REQUEST 7. State explanation of requested Developmental Standards Variance: (State what you want to do and city the section number(s) of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance which applies and/or creates the need for this request). .Carmel Clay Schools would like to incorporate three institutional si ns into the proposed Freshman Center Project and on the Carmel High c 00 campus. The 'three institutional signs would include two wall-mounted signs and one ground sign. The total number of signs would exceed the requirements of Section 25.7.02-5 of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. Existing institutional signs approved by a previous variance request will remain in the current locations. One of the existing signs will be relocated to the new northwest entrance of the Freshman Center. 8. State reasons supporting the Development Standards Variance: The Freshman Center portion of this Project will include its own main entrance and requires identification within the larger building complex, The basic concept of creating the Freshman Center on the high school site was to maintain an identity on the campus. The design of the building assists in that regard, but the signage proposed for this Project is also an important element of this separate identity concept. A wall sign made up of individual letters indicating "Freshman Center" is proposed on the west fa9ade of the Freshman Center to identify this area in a manner similar to other. portions of the high school campus that have wall signs. The addition of this sign would be consistent with the existing signage on the building and campus. A ground sign with changeable copy is also proposed to further provide identification to the Freshman Center area and provide a place to announce events to patrons and visitors. This is critical to again help separate and give identity to the Freshman Center. This ground sign is similar to the existing sign along Main Street where events planned for Carmel High School can be noted. A wall sign is also proposed for the new ticket building at the soccer stadium. This wall sign made up of individual letters indicates "Brian Murray Stadium". This sign is needed to identify another feature of the high school campus that attracts patrons and visitors. It further identifies an important figure to Carmel High School who has been honored with the naming of the soccer facility. All signs are needed to identify specific parts of a large campus and building. The signs will assist patrons and visitors attending functions at the school to find those areas and enter at the appropriate locations. Patrons and visitors are only allowed to access the building at specific locations for security reasons, and the signage further identifies those areas to avoid confusion and potential security concerns. u u OVERALL LAND DESCRIPTION Part of the North Half of Section 30 Township 18 North Range 4 East, Hamilton County, Indiana, more particu}arly described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of the East Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section; thence South 89028'10" West along the South line thereof 168.60, feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 00044'10" West 609.30 feet; thence North 30055'50" East 629.70 feet; thence North 11 039'50" East 690.74 feet; thence North 79053'18" West 39.46 feet; thence North 01030'19" West 813.14 feet to the North line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section; thence along said North line South 89032'49" West 209.92 feet to the Northeast corner of said Northwest Quarter Section; thence along the North line thereof South 89031 '05" West 111.76 feet; thence South 00037'29" East 535.00 feet to the center of Cool Creek; thence North '64016'02" West along said centerline 111.61 feet; thence North 00'37'29" West 485.70 feet to the North line of said Northwest Quarter Section; thence South .89'31'05" West 624.70 feet: thence South 01056'58" West 616.85 feet; thence South 80037'29" East 158.81 feet; thence, South 00"37'29" East along the East line of Carmelwood subdivision extended as recorded in Deed Record 136, Pages 365- 366 a distance of 808.20 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 4 of said Carmelwood subdivision; thence South 89022'31" West along the North line thereof 1 01.50 feet to the Northwest corner thereof; thence South 75013'52" West 51.81 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 8 of said Carmelwood subdivision; thence South 89"22'31" West along the North line' thereof 235.28 feet (228.5 feet - plat) to the Northwest corner thereof; thence South 14025'31" West along the West line of said Lot 8 and the extension thereof 117.38 feet to the North line of Lot 17 of said Carmelwood subdivision; thence Southwesterly along a curve to the left and along the North line of said Lot 17 a distance of 41 .97 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 17; said curve having a radius of 113.00 feet and being subtended by a chord bearing South 75059'01" West a distance of 41.73 feet; thence South 00012'29" East along the West line of said Lot 17 a distance of 165.34 feet to the ~Jorth line of property described In Warranty Deed Instrument No. 99-09901285; thence South 89022'31" West along said North line 200.70 feet to the West line of the East half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 30 T ownsh ip 18 North Range 4 East; thence South 00037'29" East along said West line 582.00 feet; thence South 89" 28'1 0" West 212.16 feet; thence South 00037'29" East 307.00 feet to the South line of said Northwest Quarter Section; thence along said South line North 89028'10" East 1365.74 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 65.082 acres, more or less, subject however to all legal easements and rights of way of record, w u AFFIDAVIT I, hereby swear that I am the owner/contract purchaser of property involved in this application and that the foregoing signatures, statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in ali respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I, the undersigned, authorize the applicant to act on my behalf with regard to this application and subsequent hearings and testimony. Signed: (Pro Date fZ-o. L-V I ~ t. r; A ~tLAf-.U~) tk.. (Piease Print) STATE OF INDIANA SS: County of &~~-~.~ (County in which notarization takes place) Before me the undersigned, a Notary Public for v!hc~~ County, State of Indiana, personally appeared (Notary Public's county of residence) KD III It . f hi y/ranc( J ( jProRertv O-'Nn~[, Attorney, or Power of Attorne:t.:)_ and acknowledge the execution of the foregoing instrument this /2 day of A-~~ ,200 2-. (SEAL) /fU.-C-t l3 .. [/n'L/7')U~c-/~~ Notary Public--Signature JC{ nIc.e' '1) '- M n1rn.e~/ A.tbei Notary Public--Please Print Pa~e 4 of a - Deve~opmen131 Slar.dards Variance AppRcatlon J'J'.~ r;'" U CITY OF CAR~EL _ CLAY TOWNSHIP U HAMILTON COUNTY. INDIANA . "-:", '";--- ,~. . , 1(,>' ,...... /-l I ~ ~I I: ./ ~ D RECF/V[D 'Fe 13 2002 DoCS 'I". .\ \ " ,-\ APPLICATION FOR BOARD OF ZONING APPEALSACTl6N DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE REQUES:+\>~ . ....-:........' I . ............' I' I'. $630.00 for the first plus $70.00 for each additional section of the ordinance bein"Qvaried. . I FEE: DOCKET NO. DATE RECEIVED: 1 ) Applicant: Carmel Clay Schools Address: 5201 East 131 st Street, Carmel, IN 46033 2) Project Name: Freshman Center, Carmel High School Engineer/Architect: Fanning/Howey Associates, Inc. Att David Day of Church, Church, Hittle & Antrim orney: Phone: (317) 844-4948 Phone: (317) 848-0966 Phone: (317) 773-5320 3} Applicant's Status: (Check the appropriate response) x (a) The applicant's name is on the deed to the property (b) The applicant is the contract purchaser of the property (c) Other: 4) rf Item 3) (c) is checked, please complete the following: Owner of the property involved: Owner's address: Phone: 5) Record of Ownership: Deed Book No./lnstrument No. Page: Purchase date: 6) Common address of the property involved: 520 East Main Street, Carmel Indiana L I d . . t' See Attached for Legal Description, including purchased properties. ega escnp Ion: Tax Map Parcel No.: 161030000007000, 161030010503000, 1610300105002000, and others. 7) State explanation of requested Developmental Standards Variance: (State what you want to do and cite the section number(s) of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance which applies and/or creates the need for this request). See Attached. Page 1 of 8 - Developmental Standards Variance Applica~on w u 8) State reasons supporting the Developmental Standards Variance: (Additionally, complete the attached question sheet entitled "Findings of Fact-Developmental Standards Variance"). See Attached. 9) 10) Present zoning of the property (give exact classification): Size of lot/parcel in question: 65.082 Present use of the property: EdLicational, Grades 9-12 Describe the proposed use of the property: Educational, Grades 9-12 R-2 acres 11 ) 12) 13) x Is the property: Owner occupied Renter occupied Other 14) Are there any restrictions, laws, covenants, variances, special uses, or appeals filed in connection with this property that would relate or affect its use for the specific purpose of this application? If yes, give date and docket number, decision ,rendered and pertinent explanation. See Attached Letter af Grant, Da1ed Nove!TIber 27, 2001. 15) Has work for which this application is being filed already started? If answer is yes, give details: ,_BuildjngJ~_eJ:mit NUl1lber: Builder: 16) If proposed appeal is granted, when will the work commence? May 2003 17) If the proposed variance is granted, who will operate and/or use the proposed improvement for which this application has been filed? Carmel Clay Schools NOTE: LEGAL NOTICE shall be published in the Noblesville Dailv Ledoer a MANDATORY twenty-five (25) days prior to the public hearing date. The certified "Proof of Publication" affidavit for the newspaper must be available for inspection the night of the hearing. LEGAL NOTICE to all adjoining and abutting property owners is also MANDATORY, two methods of notice are recommended: 1) CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED sent to adjoining property owners. (The white receipt should be stamped by the Post Office at least twenty-five (25) days prior to the public hearing date.) P~ge 2 of-8 - Developmental Slandards Variance Applicaiion u u CITY OF CARMEL - CLAY TOWNSHIP HAMILTON COUNTY, INDIANA APpLICATION FOR BOARD OF ZONING.APPEALS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE REQUEST 7. State explanation of requested Developmental Standards Variance: (State what you want to do and city the section number(s) of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance which applies and/or creates the need for this request). Carmel Clay Schools would like to construct 8...9Jound siqn that exceeds the height and changeable copy area requirements of Section 25.7.02-5 of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. ..,) 8. State reasons supporting the Development Standards Variance: The proposed ground sign height and changeable copy area is required to provide appropriate space to identify the Freshman Center and announce and inform patrons of events scheduled at the Freshman Center. The proposed size is consistent with the existing ground 'sign along Main Street at Carmel High School, and other ground signs proposed for Carmel Clay School building's. The changeable copy area size will allow the announcements to be legible by vehicles traveling along the interior circulation routes. The changeable copy area proposed is 24 square feet in lieu of the required 16 square feet. The overall size.of the sign does not exceed the overall size allowed for a combination of institutional sign and changeable copy signage. The larger changeable copy area and letter size required for the sign pushes the overall height to 6 feet - 2 inches or 1 foot - 2 inches above the maximum ground sign height requirement. Carmel Clay SchQols feels it is important for the identity of the Freshman Center to have this ground sign to signify a different area of the campus and identify specific events planned for this area. . u u ~ -----"'. . OVERALL LAND DESCRIPTION Part of the North Half of Section 30 Township 18 North Range 4 East, Hamilton County, Indjana, more particu!arly described as foflows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of the East Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section: . , . thence South 89028'10" West along the South line thereof 168.60 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 00044'10" West 609.30 feet; thence North 30"55'50" East 629,70 feet; thence North 11 "39'50' East 690.74 feet thence North 79"53'18" West 39046 feet; thence North 01030'19" West 813.14 feet to the North line of the Northeast Quarter' of said Section; thence along said North ,line South 89032'49" West 209,92 feet to the Northeast comer of said Northwest Quarter Section; thence along the North line thereof South 89031 '05" West 111.76 feet; thence South 00037'29" East 535.00 feet to the center of Cool Creek; thence North 64016'02" West along said centerline 111.61 feet; thence North 00"37'29" West 485.70 feet to the North line of said. Northwest Quarter Section; thence South 89"31 '05" West 624.70 feet; thence South 01056'58" West 616.85 feet; thence South 80037'29" East 158.81 feet; thence South 00037'29" East along the East line of Carmelwood subdivision extended as recorded in Deed Record 136, Pages 365- 366 a distance of 808.20 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 4 of said Carme~wood subdivision; thence South 89"22'31" West along the ~Jorth line thereof 101.50 feet to the Northwest corner thereof; thence South 75013'52" West 51.81 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 8 of said Carmelwood subdivision; thence South 89022'31" West along the North line thereof 235.28 feet (228.5 feet - plat) to the Northwest corner thereof; thence South 14025'31" West' along the West line of said Lot 8 and the extension thereof 117.38 feet to the North line of Lot 17 of said Carmelwood subdivision; thence Southwesterly along a curve to the left and along the North line of said Lot.17 a distClnce of 41.97 fee1 to the Northwest corner of said Lot 17; said curve having a radius of 113.00 feet and being subtended by a chord bearing South 75"59'01" West a distance of 41.73 feet; thence South DO" 12'29" East along the West line of said Lot 17 a .distance of 165.34 feet to the North line of property described in Warranty Deed Instrument No. 99-09901285; thence South 89022'31" West along said North line 200.70 feet to the West line of the East half of the Northwest Quarter of Sedion 30 Township 18 North Range 4 East; thence South 00"37'29" East along said West line 582.00 feet; thence South 89028'10" West 212.16 feet; thence South 00037'29" East 307.00 feet to the South line of sajd Northvvest Quarter Section; thence along said South line North 89"28'10" East 1365.74 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 65.082 acres, more or less, subject however to all legal easements and right~,of way of record. .f u u AFFIDAVIT I, hereby swear that I am the owner/contract purchaser of property involved in this application and that the foregoing sigmitures, statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I, the undersigned, authorize the app licanl to act on my behalf with regard to this application and subsequent hearings and testimony. Signed: (pr Attorney) Date lZ-o(..L.lr--:s E. ~AlLiL~t) Jre. (Please Print) . l STATE OF INDIANA SS: County of ~J1-I-rx.-, (County in which notarization takes place) Before me the undersigned, a Notary Public for Jh~~ County, State of Indiana, personally appeared (Notary Public's county of residence) 10)/!;/l . t~, ra//ra/~ Jr jProRertv OWfl!:lf,.Attorney, or Pawer of Attorne)l')~ and acknowledge the execution of the foregoing instrument this / ~. day of :D.-e._~~ ,200 e2 (SEAL) -/}{J.a . Z3 ~'lt/nJJ/'LLkf.-~' Notary Public--Signature Ja V11 W2.- . B ~ 1-1'1 VY)VY1~ I k her' Notary Public-Please Print .20 or Page 4 of B - Develcpmental Slandards Varianca Application ...--:- '. " HAMILTON COUNTY, INDIANA , . ',,' I. ~. ' ;, .{ ,-', , _-I 1- ./l4ECFlV[fJ . /:1.1 l'!l - . t,J 2tl0P DOCS , - . . I , I U _ CITY OF CARMEL - CLAY TOWNSHIPU DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE REQUEST j ..- \. - \> \...(} .. / -J.. / , I I - L APPLICATION 'FOR. BOARD OF ZONIN G APPEALS ACTION FEE: $630.00 for the first plus $70.00 for each additional section of the ordinance being varied. DOCKET NO. DATE RECEIVED: 1) Applicant: Carmel Clay Schools Address: 5201 East 131 st Street, Carmel, IN 46033 2) Project Name: Freshman Center, Carmel High School EngineerfArchitect: Fanning/Howey Associates, Inc. Att David Day of Church, Church, Hittle & Antrim orney: Phone: (317) 844-4948 Phone: (317)848-0966 Phone: (317) 773-5320 3) Applicant's Status: (Check the appropriate response) x (a) The applicant's name is on the deed to the property (b) The applicant is the contract purchaser of the property (c) Other: 4) If Item 3) (c) is checked, please complete the following: Owner of the property involved: Owner's address: Phone: 5) Record of Ownership: Deed Book No./lnstrument No. Page: Purchase date: 6) Common address of the property involved: 520 East Main Street, Carmel Indiana L I d . t" See Attached for Legal Description, including purchased properties. ega escnp Ion: Tax Map Parcel No.: 161030000007000,161030010503000,1610300105002000, and others. 7) State explanation ofrequested Developmental Standards Variance: (State what you want to do and cite the section number(s) of the CarmelfClay Zoning Ordinance which applies andfor creates the need for this request). See Attached. Page 1 018 -- Developmental Standards Vari""o. Application u u 8) State reasons supporting the Developmental Standatds Variance: (Additionally, complete the attached question sheet entitled "Findings of Fact-Developmental Standards Variance"). See Attached. 11 ) Present zoning of the property (give exact classification): Size of loUparcel in question: 65.082 P t f thty Educational, Grades 9-12 resen use 0 e proper : . . Describe the proposed use of the property: Educational, Grades 9-12 R-2 9) 10) acres 12) 13) x Is the property: Owner occupred Renter occupied. Other 14) Are there any restrictions, laws, covenants, variances, special uses, or appeals filed in connection with this property that would relate or affect its use far the specific purpose of this application? If yes, give date and docket number, decision rendered and pertinent explanation. See Attached Letter of Grant, Dated November 27, 2001. 15) Has work for which this application is being filed already started? If answer is yes, give details: ..J2.!Jl!d i r:!9 ...E.~I.1T1 itJ:ildmb ef: Builder: 16) jf proposed appeal is granted, when will the work commence? May 2003 17) If the proposed variance is granted, who will operate and/or use the proposed improvement for which this application has been fiied? Carmel Clay Schools NOTE: LEGAL NOTICE shall be published in the Noblesville Dailv Ledqer a MANDATORY wenty-five (25) days prior to the public hearing date. The certified "Proof of Publication" affidavit for the newspaper must be available for inspection the night of the hearing. LEGAL NOTICE to all adjoining and abutting property owners is also MANDATORY, two methods of notice are recommended: 1) CERTiFIED MAIL- RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED sent to adjoining property owners. (The white receipt should be stamped by the Post Office at least twenty-five (25) days prior to the public hearing date.) Pegs 2 of 8 - Developmental Standards Variance Application u u CITY OF CARMEL - CLAY TOWNSHIP HAMILTON COUNTY, INDIANA APPLICATION FOR BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE REQUEST .",," " 7. State explanation of requested Developmental Standards Variance: (State what you want to do and city the' section number(s) of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance which applies and/or creates the need for this request). Carmel Clay Schools would like to construct traffic directional signage at three locations, Signs A, B, and C, in excess of the size limitations required by Section 25.7.01-2 of the Carmel Clay Zoning Orainance=. --"-" 8. State reasons supporting the Development Standards Variance: The size of the directional traffic signage is required to provide legible information to direct patrons, visitors, buses and service vehicles to the appropriate locations on the Project site. With the size of the Project site and the existing building, the directional signage is extremely critical in directing vehicular traffic to the proper location to avoid potential conflicts between different vehicles. The directional traffic signage proposed is within the size parameters of existing directional signage on the Carmel High School campus. ,~ u u . OVERALL LAND DESCRIPTION Part of the North Half of Section 30 Township 18 North Range 4 East, Hamilton Counly, Indiana, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of the East Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section: thence South 89028'10" West along the South line thereof 168,60 feet to the POINT OF BEGINN ING; thence North 00044'10" West 609.30 feet; thence North 30055'50" East 629.70 feet; thence North 11039'50" East. 690.74 feet~ thence North 79053'18" West 39.46 feet; thence North 01030'19" West 813.14 feet to the North line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section; thence along said North line South 89032'49" West 209.92 feet to the Northeast corner of said Northwest Quarter Section; thence along the North line thereof South 89u31'05" West 111.76 feet; thence South 00"37'29" East 535.00 feet to the center of Cool Creek; thence North 64 (} 16'02" West along said centerline 111.61 feet; thence North 00037'29" West 485.70 feet to \he North line of said Northwest Quarter Section; thence South 89031'05" West 624.70 feet; thence South 01"56'58" West 616.85 feet; thence South 80037'29" East 158.81 feet; thence South 00"37'29" East along the East line of Carmelwood subdivision extended as recorded in Deed Record 136, Pages 365- 366 a distance of 808.20 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 4 of said Carmalwood subdivision; thence South 89022'31" West along the North line thereof 101.50 feet to the 'Northwest cor:ner tllereof; thence South 75013'52" West 51.81 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 8 of said Carmelwood subdivision; thence South 89"22'31" West along the North line thereof 235,28 feet (228.5 feet - plat) to the Northwest corner thereof; thence South 14025'31" West along the West line of said Lot 8 and the extension thereof 117.38 feet to the North line of Lot 17 of said Carmeiwood subdivision; thence Southwesterly along a curve to the left and along the North line of ,$aid Lot 17 a distance of 41.97 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 17; said curve having a radius of 113.00 feet and being subtended by OJ chord bearing'South 75"59'01" West a distance of 4 t 73 feet; thence South 00" 12'29" East along the West line of said Lot 17 a distance of 165.34 feet to the North line of property described in Warranty Deed Instrument No. 99-09901285; thence South 89022'31" West along said North line 200.70 feet to the W~st line of the East half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 30 Township 18 North Range 4 East; thence South 00037'29" East along said West line 582.00 feet; thence South 89028'10" West 2i2,16 feet; thence South 00"37'29" East 307.00 feet to the South line of said Northwest Ouarter Section; thence along said South line North 89"28'10" East 1365,74 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 65,082 acres, more or less, subject however to all legal ease.nients and rights of way or record. 1 :~ (~ u " AFFIDAVIT I, hereby swear that I am the owner/contract purchaser of property involved in this application and that the foregoing signatures, statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in ali respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I, the undersigned, authorize the applicant to act on my behalf with regard to this application and subsequent hearings and testimony. Signed: {Pro Date 12-0t.t.-IN 1:.. f"A-(Z...(Z..~D de... (Please Print) l STATE OF INDIANA S8: County of iJ~~~ (County in which notarization takes place) ~~~. Before me the undersigned, a Notary Public for County, State of Indiana. personally appeared (Notary Public's county of residence) Ro / /;/L~ . f;~ hlJ17:vnc( J,--- (progertv Owo~r,Attorney., or Power of AttorneJ.'L and acknowledge theex8cution of the foregoing instrument this /tL- day of J::Lc~ ,200 ::L (SEAL) \..-J u n (c.e. ' B , ++1 ~ rn.e-I J"I-Lbef- Notary Publfc--Please Print Myc 200{ Page 4 of B - Developme.ntal Slandard:;. V:3riance Application u u Docket No.: CARMEUCLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA . V-200-02, V-201-02, V-202-02, V-203-02, V-204-02, and V-2D5-02 Petitioner: Carmel Clay Schools FINDINGSOF FACT - DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community becaus~: See Attached. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: See Attached. 3. The strict application af the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: See Attached. DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Developmental Standards Variance Docket No. . is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this day of ,20 CHAIRPERSON, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals SECRETARY, CarmelJClay Board of Zoning Appeals . Conditions of the Board are listed on the back. (Petitioner or his representative to sign). S :\carmelclaylanduseregs\checklist\devstanda pp Revised 10/17/2000 P8g~ .3 af 9 - Deve10pmeralBI Standards Varlance Application u u ~ CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS.VARIANCE 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: The additional signs will help' identify the various specific areas of the. Freshman Center and Carmel High School. The multiple ,sigAl;; -will help ensure that patrons and visitors enter at the proper location and avoid confusion and potential security concerns. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance wiU not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: The institutional and wall signs will be similar to the signage already instaUed at Carmel High School. 'The proposed signs are lettering withoutspecific'designs or s'peciallighting effects. These signs would not adversely affect adjacent properties. 3. The strict appiicationof the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property Will result in practical difficulties in the use cif the property because: Without the additionalsignage, areas of the building would not be id.entifiable for patrons or visitors approaching the building. A building of this size and scope requires areas and entrances to be identifiable from the exterior. The signs will allow users to find parking area near the entrance ,they desire, and to avoid traveiing through the building to reach specific areas. The various signs will also assist building administration with security issues by directing patrons and visitors to specific entrances that can be supervised. All other entrances are typically inaccessible from the exterior in an educational facility, Previous approved varianc~s for the Carmel High School campus have supported these issues and ailowed muitiple institutionai signage to be erected on the campus. u u ... CARMEL/CLAY BOARD'OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and , general welfare of the community because: The size ofthe signage is appropriate for the overall size of the site, and is similar to existing signs on the Carmel High School campus. The ground sign is not located in an area where it will block anysightlines for traffic purposes, 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substa,ntially adverse manner because: The signage is similar in size to existing signs on the Carmel High School property, and will not affect adjacent properties., The sign materials will be' consistent with the proposed additions to Carmel High School, and other signs on the campus, 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: The size limitations for the ground sign would prohibit signage in a size that would be clearly legible frOm passing vehicle$, The vast majority of patrons and visitors will be seeing this type of sign from their vehicle. It is also typical oLa school this size to hold multiple 'events, ' and those events require places for announcements, Information to facility patrons and visitors would be limited due to the strict application of the size limitations. u u . ..... CITY OF CARMEL - CLAY TOWNSHIP , , HAMILTON COUNTY, INDIANA APPLICATION FOR BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE REQUEST 7. ' State explanation of requested Developmental Standards Variance: (State what you ~ want to do and city the section number(s) of the CarmelfClay Zoning Ordinance which applies andfor creates the need for this request). Carmel Clay Schools would like to incorporate three institutional signs into the proposed Freshman Center Project and on the Carmel High School campus. Thethree institutional signs would include two wall-mounted signs and one ground sign. The total number of signs would exceed the requirements of Section 25.7.02-5 'of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. Existing institutional signs approved by a previous variance request will remaih in the current locations. One of the existing signs will be relocated to the new northwest entrance of the Freshman Center. 8. State reasons supporting the Development Standards Variance: The Freshman Center portion of this Projec;t will include its own main entrance and requires identification within the larger building complex. The basic concept of creating the Freshman Center on the high school site was to maintain an identity on the campus, 'The design of the building assists in that regard, but the signage proposed for this Project is also an important element of this separate identity concept. A wall sign made up ofindividua! letters indicating "Freshman Center" is proposed on the west fayade of the Freshman Center to identify this area in a manner similar to other portions of the high school campus that have wall signs. The addition of this sign would be consistent with the existing signage on the building and c:ampus. A ,ground sign with changeable copy is' also proposed to fU,rther provide identification to the Freshman Center area and provide ? place to announce events to' patrons and visitors. This is critical to again help separate and give identity to the Freshman Center. This ground sign is similar to the existing sign along Main Street where events planned for Carmel High School can be noted. A wall sign is also proposed for the new ticket building at the soccer stadium. This wall sign made up orind/vidual letters indicates "Brian Murray Stadium". This sign is needed to identify another feature of the high school oampus that attracts patrons and visitors. It further identifies an important figure to Carmel High School who has been honored with the naming of the soccer facility, All signs are needed to identify specific parts of a large campus and building. The signs will assist patrons and visitors a'ttending functions at the school to find those areas and enter at the appropriate locations. Patrons and visitors are only allowed to access the building at specific locations for security reasons, and the signage further identifies those areas to avoid confusion and potential security concerns, u u 4j " ,-it ciTY 6F CARMEl- CLAY TOWNSHIP HAMILTON COUNTY, INDIANA. .APpLlcATION FOR BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE REQUEST 7. State explanation of requested Developmental Standards Variance:. (State what you want to do and city the section number(s) of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance which applies and/or creates the need for this request). Carmel Clay Schools would like to construct a ground sign that exceeds the height and .changeable copy area requirements of Section 25.7.02-5 of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. 8. . State reasons supporting the Development Standards Variance: The proposed ground sign height and changeable copy area is required to provide appropriate space to identify the Freshman Center and announce and inform patrons of events scheduled at the Freshman Center. The proposed size is consistent with the existing ground sign along Main Street at Carme.1 High School, and other ground signs proposed for Carmel Clay School buildings. The changeable copy area size will allow the announcements to be legible by vehicles traveling along the interior circulation routes. The changeable copy area proposed is 24 square feet in lieu of the required 16 square feet. The overall size of the sign does not exceed the overall size allowed for a combination of institutional sign and changeable copy Slgnage. The largei changeable copy aiea and letter size required for the sign pushes the overall height to 6 feet - 2 inches or 1 foot - 2 inches above the maximum ground sign height requirement Carmel Clay Schqols feels it is important for the identity of the Freshman Center to have this ground sign to signify a different area of the campus and identify specific events planned for . this area. 'I) '" ~- ~ u u .~' CARMELlCLA Y BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No.: V-206-02 Petitioner: Carmel Clay Schools FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE 1. The approval of this variance will not.be injurious to the public health, safety. morals and general welfare of the community because: . See. Attached. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property induded in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: See Attached. 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: See Attached. DEC1SION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Developmental Standards Variance Docket No. is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this day of ,20 CHAIRPERSON, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals SECRETARY, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals Condltions of the Board are listed on the back. (Petitioner or his representative to sign). S :\carmelcl aylanduse regs\checklist\devstandapp Revised 101"17/2000 Page 8 of".. Developmental Sl~n"ards Variance Appllcatior, /?- u" u CARMEUGLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA FINDIN"GS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE 1. The approval of thls variance will not be injurious to .the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the commu"nity because: The overall building heights are dictated by the required size of the additions to support the increased student population and the functions included within the additions. Keeping the building additions compact and near the existing building will minimize the visual impact of the addition on adjacent properties. The proposed additions are also similar in height to other portions of the existing building and will be below the highest portion of the existing building. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included" in the variance wlll not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: The main building additions along the northwest remain approximately 280 feet from adjacent properties at the. closest point. This is a greater distance than the current configuration. Currently, there is an area betwe~n 190 and 260 feet from the existing building to adjacent properties. This separation will help minimize the visual impact of the three-story addition., . The height. of the building will improve visual screening and sound screening of roof-mounted mechanical equipment currently open to the adjacent properties. 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: The strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would gieatly increase the building footprint supporting a student capacity desired for this Project. This increase in building footprint would not fit within the property owned by Carmel Clay Schools. The strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would also (educe functionality of some spaces in tile building program. /v "to (/ " u ( 1 V CITY OF CARMEL -CLAYTOWNSHIP HAMILTON COUNTY, INDIANA "APPLICATION FOR BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE REQUEST 7. State explanation of requested Developmental Standards Variance: (State what you want to do and city the section number(s) of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance which applie~ and/or creates the need for this request). Carmel Clay Schools would like to construct additions to the .existing Carmel High School where the height exceeds the ordinance requirement stated in Section 8.4 of the Carmel Clay Zoning Ordinance 8. State reasons supporting the Development Standards Variance: The size of the proposed additions is based on the projected student enrollment anticipated in the future for Carmel High School. The limitations of the Project site and desire to maintain a compact floor plan for the building additions requires a multi-story bUilding for the main building addition. The height of the major portion of this addition is 44 feet - 0 inches, with a mechanical e"nclosure e~tending to 57 feet - 0 inches. This three-story addition is similar in height to the three-story portion of the existing Duilding on the west side of the Carmel High School. The height of this existing portion of the building is 48 feet. The proposed addition will not be the highest building element on the high school campus. The highest building point is at the existing auditorium fly loft; approximately 66 feet above grade. The east building addition is both slightly above and lower in portions than the existing building at that location, approximately 24 feet - 6 inches. The height is required due to the music performance spaces located \Jvithtn the addition. These heights are needed to maintain the acoustical performance desired in the music spaces. :\)---,..~ . )' ~>, il.. u u -"; .<.':,-:i~ .~! > -' - . ~. ~ 1... '--; ^ " ~.\ Freshman Center ! "-~. j\. \. -, Carmel High School !. ,-/ REf'i:I"FO ' .\ ~_~ LI - \ Ccarmell cllad~ Schools ~~ I r I ~ 't ~~ ~./ ~ ,i arme, n' lana pro. Ject No. 201105.00 . . "--'~" DOCS "." 6"" /'/. Summary of Commitments made during February 24. 2003 Board of Zonii':1g,Appeals:Meeting '':''~lJJ1:,;.>''-' Following is a summary of issues discussed and items committed to by Carmel Clay Schools during the February 24, 2003 Board of Zoning Appeals meeting. These items will be incorporated into the plans for the Freshman Center and can be made a condition of approval if required. - , G The Andich Property at 120 Sylvan Lane recently purchased by Carmel Clay Schools will remain a residential property. " The proposed plan provides improvements to the student walkway along the north road and tne circular drop-off at the north entrance. These improvements will allow bus traffic to enter the site from Smokey Row Road. This will eliminate the current bus loading on Main Street. Additional bus drop-off will occur at the north circular drive. " Carmel Clay Schools and the construction team will review small trees not identified in the survey after the layout of the site improvements has been completed. An attempt will be made to save as many smaller trees as possible or adjust the layout as needed to save some additional existing trees. Staff from the Department of Development could participate in this review during construction if desired. o The parking located along the curve of the new interior drive along the northwest side in the proposed plan will be eliminated. . Preliminary plans have been developed for an additional parking lot northeast of the building. This parking lot would support and additional 152 spaces. These parking spaces are above those required by the zoning ordinance when all of the parking available on the campus is considered. The additiOnal spaces are also not required during the school day to accommodate staff and students permitted to park adjacent to the school. This additional lot would provide additional parking only for event activities at the High School. Carmel Clay Schools would like to have the option to work with the Department of Development staff in determining the requirement and timing of this additional parking. .. ..... '~- ."'" !if -..,c:..- ... u u CARMEL CLAY SCHOOLS EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PLAN CARMEL HIGH SCHOOL Developed 1999 - 2000 Developed by Carmel Clay Schools and Carmel High School with assistance from Carmel Police and Fire Departments Plan provided to each staff member and included in each classroom Plan provides general guidelines for numerous emergency scenarios requiring both evacuation and remaining within the building. Each classroom teacher is responsible to supervise the evacuation of their class and students following the emergency evacuation routes from the building. Once outside the building the plan instructs classes to walk clear of the building leaving driveways open for emergency vehicles. The class or group must be kept together and attendance is taken. Complete evacuation of the building occurs in approximately 4-5 minutes. Safety Zones within the building have been established if it is acceptable to return to the building. There is a designated evacuation site if the situation requires this portion of the plan to be placed in affect. Other potential evacuation sites have also been established by Carmel Clay Schools. Carmel Fire Department will go to the main fire alarm panel location initially to determine location of fire hazard and communicate with school administration. From this location the remaining fire vehicles will be directed to the specific fire hazard location and utilize the nearest fire hydrant and fire department connection. Carmel Clay Schools Safety Officers will assist in directing traffic during an emergency and maintaining emergency access. If access is needed at the bus drop-off area, radio communication is available between the buses and the administration to clear the bus area. ~ \ r <Bl -------l ! i ----"---1 i ______J ----------1 ! i - ---------, I ! " ~')' 2ND STREET I -- ( ---- .........- ~ R H c t I I \ // I ! I. / ,\------.-------t-..--.---------L------("/ I : : I ! I \ I ''ll.".=- FRESHMAN CENTER ADDITION , .i ;{ .A 1 2 3 STUDENT DROP-OFF /PICK-UP 4 CAFETERIA, DELIVERIES GYMNASIUMS/NATATORIUM SOCCER FIELD/FRESHMAN CENTER 5 - 6 BUSES ONLY /TEMPORARY SIGNl 7 FRESHMAN CENTER/STUDENT DROP-OFF SOCCER FIELD/GYMNASIUMS/NA T A TORIUM DELIVERIES (~~ . J Q AUDITORIUM, GYMNASIUMS NA T A TORIUM/SOCCER FIELD STUDENT DROP-OFF STUDENT DROP-OFF <? I I I I I I I I 8 CARMEL HIGH SCHOOL ~ If SOCCER FIELD/GYMNASIUMS/NA T A TORIUM TENNIS/ST ADIUM -, Jl MAIN STREET I I I l -._,_.-1-.-'- - 6.-- )/ , ( - U/t.. , lO " ~ . . .. -. "\ " c '~/-' L i ~ ( .~1.- _urr i j NEW PROPERTY lINEJ ..11.11....11.11 ------l I \ -_._-----~ t I _______uJ ----------1 l ! ---------1 I 1 __ __'._ I 2ND STREET I .- r - ;<il / \. , II I- ii I I . i II I- ii I . \ ( I I - ~ <i> --.- ....-- MtOO1t1 . . !Be. urr . FIRE HYDRANT / FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION EMERGENCY EXIT X MAIN FIRE ALARM PANEL FIRE .DEPT. ACCESS ~FIRE DEPT. ACCESS ROUTES _ MARKED FIRE LANES r--- ~ i I -. EXIt .-. IllIT 1= : EIEIQ. EXIT _mr --, I J i J~ .... DIl' __ Em .. ...-..-..... u/~ ~ "). C1f I . l?- /.f '\ ( I l... 1 (J- -- )/ ~ ; ;.. A &cjENGINEERING CO~LLC CONSULTING ENGINEERS ='; Steven J. Fehribach, PE Vice President 8425 Keystone Crossing, Suite 200 Indianapolis, In 46240 (317) 202-0864 fax (317) 202-0908 www.af-eng.com William J Fehrihach, r.E, President MEMORANDUM DATE: 3/19/03 TO: Mr. Ron Farrand Jr. Director of Facilities & Transportation Carmel-Clay Schools FROM: Matt Brown, P.E. /';l,~.:f A&F Engineering Co., LLC RE: Carmel High School Freshmen Wing INTRODUCTION & SCOPE A&F Engineering has conducted a Trame Operations and Traffic Flow Study at Carmel High School. The purpose of this study was to identify travel patterns as they exist today and to develop and reconunend travel patterns that could be used when a proposed freshman wing is added to the existing high schooL The recommended travel pattems are developed in order to improve the traffic flow in and around the high school in conjunction with the opening of the new wmg. DESCRIPTION OF FUTURE EXPANSION A freshman wing is being planned by the Carmel-Clay School Administration. This wing would house all existing and all future freshman attending Carmel High School. Approximately 960 freshman students are currently enrolled at the high school with approximately 240 more to be added over the next ten years. In order to accommodate the new wing, changes will be made to the internal roadway system and to the existing parking lot layout. Figure 1 shows the existing school layout and the future school layout after the expansion is added. FIELD REVIEW A field review was conducted around and within the Carnlel High School site during the morning and afternoon peak hours ofthe school. As parL of the review, entering and exiting traffic flows were noted for all vehicles. In addition, all traffic control devices were documented and their effect on traffic movement was noLed. Finally, pedestrian movement into and out of the site was observed. "DATi\. COLLECTION Manual peak hour turning movement traffic volumes counts were collected by A&F Engineering during a typical school day during the hours of 6:45 AM to 8:00 AM and from 2:30 PM to 4:00 PM. These counts were collected at the following locations: 1. Main Street and 4lh Avenue 2. Main Street and the High School Center Drive 3. Main Street and the High School East Drive u u The traffic volume counts included all passenger vehicles, buses and conunercial vehicles that passed through the three data collection locations during the study hours. .Figure 2 summarizes the peak hour traffic volumes at each location. In addition to the traffic volume counts, special notice was given to traffic queuing due to afternoon pick-up traffic at the front of the school. PEAK TIME PERIODS Cannel High School is in session from 7:50 AM to 3:05 PM Monday through Friday. Therefore, morning drop-offtraffi.c is greatest from 7:00 AM to 8:00 AM and afternoon pick-up traffic is greatest between 3:00 PM and 4:00 PM. Physical traffic control barriers, traffic cones and m<illual traffic control are used from 7:15 AM to 7:50 AM and from 3:05 PM to 3:40 PM to direct traffic entering and exiting the high school. EXISTING TRAFFIC FLOW ANALYSIS Based on the traffic data collection and the field review, the existing traffic patterns and the existing traffic control devices were graphically iJlustrdted in order to develop a simplistic snapshot of the existing traffic patlcms. Figure 3 and Figure 4 show the existing traffic flows and the existing traffic control devices used during the AM and PM peak time periods. PROPOSED TRAFFIC FLOWS When the proposed freshman wing is opened, traffic destinations will change due to the fact that many freshman students are dropped off in the morning and picked-up in the aftemoon. Currently, most of these drop-offs and pick-ups are done in front of the school off of Main Street. However, the new wing will create a greater demand near the rear of the site. Thus, future traffic flows need to be developed to accommodate these new traffic destinations within the site. The proposed new traffic flow patterns and the resulting traffic control recommendations are illustrated on Figure 5 andl<'igure 6. >< 'i '" o I to I '" o () ;; o i:; I J: >< W <D "' o "' o /' o '" C> /' ." "' o "' o /' '" o ~ /' N ( \ '-" I ~ '-' .. FIGURE 2 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES ~I' ~:~DV,EY ~~~O~ ,,--~--- .I "--- 17-n '1" LEGEND 00 = A.M. PEAK HOUR (7 A.M.-8 A.M.) (00) = P.M. PEAK HOUR (3 P.M.-4 P.M.) 2,\1:: qREET ~ '" t 193 (80) ~ ~ ~ ~427 (231) ~ ~ "+ .&" 62 (97) (51) 124 ~ ~ t r" (195) 274....... ~ r-- ~ (105) 36.... ~~-;;;- ... t::.:-- ~ ~ ~ ro r--. <D 0 ~~- -~ <D~ ~ 0;;::' ....- 445 (332) +l ~ ... -+ B (8) (19) 15.7 ~ t ,. (383) 351-P ~ "" r-.. (8) 3~ t 264 (81) "" 0 r-. ~ 443 (322) ~ ~ ... .3 (11) (29) 106 J'- ~ t f't (461) 196 -P ~::: N (17) 7 ~ @A & F Engineering Co., LLC 2003 "ALL Rig hts Reserved" U FUTURE TRAFFIC FLOW IMPROVEMENTS When the proposed freshman wing is opened, the traffic patterns and traffic control methods recommended in this study should be implemented. The following is a summary of the potential traffic flow improvements that will occur due to these recommendations: u . A number of busses currently park on Main Street during the PM peak time period. When the proposed expansion is constructed, the rear parking area will be used to store these busses. Therefore, bus parking will be eliminated on Main Street. .. A significant number of pick-up vehicles queue in front of the school during the PM peak hour while they wait for school to let out. At times, these queues can back up onto Main Street. Due to the fact that a significant number of pick-ups are for freshman students, these pick up trips will be diverted to the rear of the building when the expansion is constructed. Thus, queuing onto Main Street from the front of the building is less likely to occur. e As part of the future expansion, the sidewalk that runs from the northern parking lot to 1361h Street will be widened and a barrier wall will be constructed between the roadway and the sidewalk. This barrier wall will discourage the use of the roadway by students walking to and from the school during the morning and afternoon peak times. The separation of pedestrian flows from traffic flows will increase safety along this roadway. . The northern roadway that connects the northern parking lot to 1361h Street/Smokey Row Road is currently closed to vehicular traffic from 3:05 PM to 3:40 PM. This roadway is closed because students typically use the roadway to walk from the school to the stadium parking lot. The constmction ofthe barrier wall (discussed above) will separate pedestrian and vehicular traffic. Therefore, this roadway will be opened during the PM peak time once the expansion is completed. Opening this roadway for two way traffic during the AM and PM peak hours will reduce the amount of vehicles accessing the front ofthe building for pick-ups and drop-offs. . A portion of an existing parking lot will be eliminated when the freshman wing is constructed. However, a new parking lot will be constructed just west of the proposed wing. The addition ofthis parking lot will ensure that future parking capacity will be greater than the existing parking capacity. ..i-. ~~ ;-:. - :. _ ". _~ . ~ >: ,':..: -. " ,~.. . - '~""~~ c ~L N Z o VI ..... Al I'T1 I'T1 ..... III FIGURE 6 PM PEAK PROPOSED TRAFFIC FLOW ~~~ 4TH AVENUE ~~ \~? ~ \ ~ \) ) / I / II / \\ ~~ \~--_/ ~ . AUDUBON DRl'IE \.JIIIIIIIIIIIIIII-IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ~( I'T1 --t '" :l! .., o I .., I .., o ~ a e>: o Cl: Q. I :J: >< w .., .., ~ a ,.- ~ a ,.- .., .., o .., a ,.- .., a ~ ,.- N > C o o to o Z o Al ~ LEGEND PARENTS, STUDENTS, STAFF BUSSES BUS PARKING · TRAFFIC CONTROL CONES 0--- GATE @ ~ANUAl TRAFFIC CONTROL l VI !:: o ^ I'TJ -< :::0 o ::E :::0 o )> o r ~ ~ )JI -~ 1 @ ~~ C. , E,.;,,,,,. c~.. llC 2003 "ALL Rights Reserved ~ " c '" ~ l ~ z o V'l -f :;0 r"'\ r"'\ -f " Iii ~-~ FIGURE 5 AM PEAK PROPOSED TRAFFIC FLOW I r r iJ [ 4TH AVENUE II ~ r r"'\ -f ~ \~ )) I )> c o o to o :z o :;0 ~ /j ~:;:; , ~~--~--;/ AUOUBON ORIVE ..., o I ..., I ..., o '-' ~ Cl 0.: o '" <>. I :I: X ~ o ..., o /' '-' .., ~ "" ..., o '" Cl /' '" o o N /' N ~ - - ,.. ...-..... ." '- <-----' ~ ~ LEGEND PARENTS, STUDENTS, STAFF BUSSES BUS PARKING · TRAFFIC CONTROL CONES 0--- GATE @ MANUAL TRAFFIC CONTROL I I --~~ l Ul :s::: o ^ fTl -< ;:0 o :E I~ ,0 L ~ @ ~~ r@,. r ['9''''""9 c~., u.c 2003 "ALL Rights Reserved '1f111111111""IIII~ L ~~I c t>.) ::l a. Ul -1 ;U J'T1 J'T1 -1 <-----/ ~ :c FIGURE 4 PM PEAK HOUR EXISTING TRAFFIC FLOW I I J [4TH AVENUE I ~ LEGEND PARENTS. STUDENTS, STAFF BUSSES BUS PARKING · TRAFFIC CONTROL CONES 0---- GATE l@ MANUAL TRAFFIC CONTROL '-.J 1IIII111111111 H IIII1III111111I1111 U ~ :.: :i! '" <:> I '" I ,.., <:> ~ c 8 I :I: >< W '" ,.., :;; <:> /' ~ 5>- :>l <:> ,.., <:> /' '" <:> <:> N /' N ~ ~)-s ~t- :<.~ "'>~ AUDuBON DR. l Ul !:: o ^ rrI -< ;u o :E ;u o )> o J L ~ - . . . (@, . F '"91"~'1"9 Co" IIC 200J I ( "All Rights Reserved" -- ~ L Ul ' --11 ~ "" :i n o I n I n o \;? o X ..., I :x: x ..., <D n o n o /' Cl .. ;3- <D n o '" o /' ~ /' N ~ f _' ., .;.... :_~':- .' . ~ _ r '"'. -:. .....11 ,-~-:':. ..l..:.: :::...~...- ,;,- ." . , '. :'"'l...~ i '1 ~ ...:. .: c IV ::J Q. Ul -I AI rT'I rT'I -I '----/ ~:c- FIGURE 3 AM PEAK HOUR EXISTING TRAFFIC FLOW i 4 TH A VENUE LEGEND PARENTS, STUDENTS, STArr BUSSES BUS PARKING TRAFFIC CONTROL CONES .....--- GATE @ MANUAL TRAFFIC CONTROL OD~ . ~c, ,.}J.t- ~ ~" "'>~ AUDUBON DR. l Ul :s:: o ^ rT'I -< AI o ~ AI o }>- o J -.! 1 ./. . ::?: . . ---c "- @ ~ (@,. F Eo.;o,,'o. c~.. ltC 2003 II I G" ALL Rights Reserved '" 0 0 N U -' -' O. U'." '" g'~ .- '" :3~ ~ ... .-------, '" '" ~a:: "5> en ,,- W~ L.....Q: -"1-' -' <.<1. @ jl II ; l- =>> (== 0 > <l: \ .J Cl I :1 .J 0 0 ~ ~ (,) tJJ I w a: tJJ =>> l- I- :J :J 0 ~ LI. > < -' .J 0 ,.. 0 ~ W (,) tJJ J a: :J W ~ a: - :J LI. I- :J -:::!~ ~ LL ~ ~ z jl - I- 00 - >< I I' W ..... I I- :/ :) 0 ,r:::::: > I < I .J S' .J 0 ~l 0 0 " > ' 0 w " 0 ~ ~ " (.) I: CJ) I I c z - I- tJJ I - (]I) (1111111 II 'I~.'IIIIII ~II'IIIIIIII II~~ >< W ~11I fo-al-fO l=l ~MaX]-HX]gfOfO\~Ma\gfOfO\foa~\:z -i prr;,~IVr-D ~.. - DOCS 1 I ! I I n~ . \ G - ... I!il ---.... " '\ AlJDUIOlj DR. , Ii -I Cod . KEY o .EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN o NEW TREES 159 :I: . RELOCATED TREES 67 :I: * TREES TO BE REMOVED 51 ~ ~. . D~~~nning!JIowey Associates mc. Architects Engineers Consultants 100' 200' 300' 500' TREE INVENTORY PLAN CARMEL CLAY SCHOOLS CARMEL HIGH SCHOOL fEBRUARY 18, 2003 ..J EXIITWG PARKING (1~~I~I~I~~~I~~ .-.". . - - -.' ,~. .,; ~'.. ..... ~ ... , . ;'lO",.:.;-.........~ c c ~ ~\. \ .. ) ! I R~CFIVED FW 19 ...." 'I' I DOCS \} I - / / - / \ j " j \ t , ~ ~ ~-... ....-""- CARMEL HIGH SCHOOL -- ID~[JrFL~~~ng/Howey U~A~sociates Inc. Architects Engineers Consultants ~ o 100' 200' 100 I "'" SITE PLAN ~ CARMEL CLAY SCHOOLS ~ CARMEL HIGH SCHOOL FEBF<UARY 18, 2003 DEC-19-02 10:22 FROM-FANNING ~nwcY-INDPLS V 3178480843 T-S80 P.OS/OS HBS V ! RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION RECFIVED LAND DESCRIPTION ' ~ 19 ,1;2 Pa of the North Half of Sec~on 30 Township 16 Nonh Range 4 East. HamHt09pmunty, Indiana, more particularly described as follows; Commencing at the Southeast comer of the East Half of the Northwest Q~arter of said Section; thence South 89028'10" West along the South line thereof 168.60 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 00044'10" West 609.30 feet; ttlence NOM 30.55'50' East 629.70 feet; thence North 11039'50" East 690.74 feet; 111ellce North 79.53'18' West 39.46 feet; thence North 01030'19" West 813.14 feet to the North line of me Northeast Quarter of said Section; thence along said North line South 89032'49" West 209.92 feet to the Northeast comer of said Northwest Quarter Section; thence along the North line thereof South 89631'05" West 111.76 feet; thence South 00037'29" East 535.00 feet to the center of Cool Creet<; ttlenoe Norm 64016'02" West along said centerline 111.61 feet; thence North 00037'29" Wltst 485.70 feet to the North line of said Norttlwest Quarter Section; thence South 89031'05. West 624.70 feet; ttlence South 01056'58. West 616.85 feet; thence South 8Qog7'29' Ellst 158.81 feet: thence South 00037'29" East along tile East line of CarmelwoQt1 su~ivision extended as recorded in Deed Record 136, Pages 365- 366 a dismnce of 808.20 feet to the Northeast comer of Lot 4 of said Carmelwood subdivision: thence South 89D22'31' West along the North line thereof 101.50 feet to the Northwest comer thereof and the POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; thence Southwesterly along a curve to the righl 244.12 feet; said curve having a radius of 159.96 feet and being subtended by a charct bearing South 351105'37" West 221.11 feet: thence Westet1y alOng a curve to Ule nght 45.29 feet; said curve haVing a radius of 163.52 feet and being subtended by a chord Bearing South 86016'00' West 45.15 feet; mence Westerly along a ClJrve to the rtght 70.55 feet: said curve having a radius of 162.84 feet aM being subtended by a chord bearing Nann 73025'27" West 70.00 feet; thence Northwesterly along a curve to the left 59.65 feet: said curve having a radius of 143.35 feet and being subtended by a cnord bearing North 68047'38" West 59.22 feet; thence North 09017'06" East 50.00 feet; thence Southeasterty along a curve to the nght 79.88 feet; said curve having a radlLls of 193.35 feet and being subtended by a chord bearing South 68047'38" East 79.88 feet; thence Southeasterty along a cLlrve to the left 45 32 feet; said CUNe having a racJjus of 118.08 and being subtended by a chord beanng South 74034'514 East 45.04 feet; thence Easteny along a curve to the left 31.35 feet; said curve !laving a radius of 113.67 feet and bemg subtended bV a chord beanng North 86017'34' East 31.25 feet; ttlence Northeasterty along a CUNe to the left 162.37 feet; said curve having a radius of 107.44 feet and being subtended by a chord bearing Nortl136017'47'" East 147.35 feet; thence North 75013'52" East 51.61 feet to the Point of Beginning; containing 0.428 acres, more or less; subject however to all legal easements ana ngtlts of way of record. DEC-19-02 10:21 FROM-FANNING Hn~Y-INDP~S W 3118480843 T-680 P. 05/06 Has U {$.>.rv ~;::;:: r '"~ {;) ~ {:] ~ ~ 2~.9f ~(p. i " f ~ I ?e~A~, ~~ It ~rJ'i'E' M-~ ~'W\lMr- c..a~ I I I @-I I I -I > DEC-19-02 10:21 FROM-FANNING HOW;Y-INDPLS U 3178480843 T-6eO P. 04/06 F-688 U I I I I I ~ ~~)>"<::I" ~<S! \,~ ~', ~,. \)~\;1' ~ltAI.JG, I...e~* ~ Ii5lE M;r.J-IUlM<I~i tAA$f AWMIAfVM 1-..~~. ~~ ~Q""'~- III 'Tlh~. H-6wG."'Oc.A ~TY(.,~ 1"b ~A-rc:.H- I itJ<\ ~tJ If,. ~~ I tJ~ .A:c..1I.u 'IlfVM . I ;.H J.. t:>' r/ " '/. ,C( , (p 1ltp -$(nt~ ~Q~ ~vAA16 '--~S- S -t- " 30 "Il 'i 0" .._".__.._~_ i ~ :- -=1 D ... --.---- OEC-1Q-02 10:20 FROM-FANNING HO~Y-INOPL$ 3178480843 U I U g~ 'I""'" I ~~ T-S80 p.o2/06 F-S8S v ...I ---..--[ I ! --.-.----, ! i nJ.L..- 420 2nd STREET Cl \_..~ . \ . . I .. , \\fi: , . rJ r- f...... ' " / , ~.ffi9 Htl H.U ~ ct~ )~I$iltJ6~oNOc~ ~o- DEC-1S-02 10:20 FROU-FANNING H~~Y-INDPLS 1-- - .- J -! \ ... - -........ '-' ~,~AGE - ~ -,~ ~ N.. ~fP .Jc.6, \ Z l(~ ~... ~ 1w~FAc"- - ~ .....rwm ~;JTiZs~ ~--ILW~~ "'~"" f':" 6l..4~ '~~~Jo Ut'iO I J l STREET J ; 3178480843 -- y AI. T-680 P.03/0S F-588 'w. u CARMEUCLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No.: Petitioner: Carmel Clay Schools FINDINGS OF FACT - SPECIAL USE 1,' The Special Use in Flood Plarn District, Ordinance 2-160, Section 21.6 as amended (does) (does not) apply and a[1 prerequisites have been met by Petitioner as verified by: See Attached 2. The Special Use will be consisteht with the Character and Permitted Land Use of the zoning district and Carmer/Clay Comprehensive Plan because: See Attached 3. The Special Use is physically suitable for the land in question because: See Attached 4. The Special Use wi [I riot injuriously or adversely affect the adjacent land or property values because: See Attached 5. The Special Use will not adversely affect vehrcuJar or pedestrian traffic flow, nor the adequate availability of water, sewage, or storm drainage facilities, or police or fire protection because: See Attached 6. The Board has reviewed the requirements of Ordinance Z-160, Section 21.3' (1-25) as they relate to this Special Use, and does not find that those criteria prevent the granting of the Special Use: DECISION IT ]S THEREFORE the decision of the CarmellClay Board of Zoning Appeals that Special Use Docket Number is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board, whkh are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this day of ,20 CHAIRPERSON, CarmellClay Board of Zoning Appeals SECRETARY, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals Conditions of the Board are listed on the back. (Petitioner. or his representative to sign). s:\fOlms\Special Use Application Revised 10/17/2000 Paga 8 018 - SpaCial U"e ~ ~pjicaticn u u CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA FINDINGS OF FACT - SPECIAL USE 1. The Special Use in Flood Plain District, Ordinance Z-160, Section 21.6 as amended does not apply and all prerequisites have been met by the Petitioner as verified: The site does not faU within a Flood Plain District per the survey of the existing property performed for this Project and survey information completed for past projects on this site. 2. The Special Use will be consistent with the Character and Permitted Land Use of the zoning district and Carmel/Clay Comprehensive Plan because: The Project site is the existing Carmel High School and the proposed Project maintains the same function of that site. A school of secondary education is a Special Use permitted within a R-2 zoning district per the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. 3. The Special Use is physically suitable for the land in questlon because: The proposed additions fall within the existing property limits of Carmel High School. However, additional land has been purchased to expand the Carmel High School property limits. This additional land will provide space for additional improvements and a buffer to the adjacent residential property. The proposed building additions are consistent with the existing building and no dangerous site conditions are created by the proposed Project. 4. The Special Use will not injuriously or adversely affect the adjacent land or property values because: . The proposed Project will maintain the existing site function in place for a number of years. The proposed Project eliminates the traffic concerns that would negatively affect adjacent properties to the northwest. As vehicular traffic will increase in the future, better vehicular circulation throughout the Project site and optional routes for buses and vehicles should benefit surrounding streets, residential, and commercial property, Buffer space, landscape buffering, and fencing will be maintained between the proposed improvements and adjacent properties to the northwest to. help shield and protect those properties from the movements and views to the High School campus. 5. .Tbe Special Use will not adversely affect vehicular or pedestrian traffic flow, nor the adequate availability of water, sewage, or storm drainage facilities or police and fire protection because: . As stated previously, with the residential property purchase and disconnection of the High School drives from Audubon Drive and Sylvan Lane to the northwest, a major traffic issue for the adjacent neighborhood has been eliminated. The elimination of this traffic reduces dangerous situations noted by adjacent property owners. The continuation of the vehicular circulation around the entire High School building and proposed additions with the reconfigured drives maintains a vehicular pattern similar to the existing circulation. A new student drop-off area at the Freshman Center will remove some traffic from the main entrance and Main Street during the morning and afternoon drop-off periods. With the reconfigured north bus drop-off area, additional bus traffic can enter the site from Smokey Row Road reducing bus traffic on the west side of the site and 4th Avenue. u u New walkways along the recoilfigured drive northwest of the proposed addition will maintain pedestrian access around the building and from the adjacent neighborhood. The new walkways provide direct pedestrian access to Main Street and adjacent public buildings. The existing water service on the Project site will support the new additions with some minor modifications and rerouting of the service lines to the proposed additions. Sanitary sewers for the proposed Project will connect to new sanitary sewer mains being jointly construction by the City of Carmel and Carmel Clay Schools. The increased sanitary sewer load will be handled by the new the sanitary sewer piping. The Project will not adversely impact existing sanitary sewer lines serving the property. Storm sewer facilities will be constructed as part of the proposed improvements. A new detention area will be created to detain the increased run-off from the hard surface areas. The existing storm sewer system will continue to handle the existing site and'the various miscellaneous improvements planned for the Project. Coordination with the City of Carmel Fire Department has occurred. No major issues impacting the ability of the Fire Department to serve Carmel High School and the Project have been noted. An emergency access point connecting.,the new drive on the High School property with the reconnected Sylvan Lane and Audubon Drive will provide emergency access to the adjacent neighborhood from the south for both fire and police emergencies. 6. The Board has reviewed the requiremerits of Ordinance 2-160, Section 21.3 (1-25), as they relate to this Special Use, and does not find those criteria prevent the granting of the Special Use: The criteria has been reviewed and the Special Use request applies with the criteria. u w My commission expires: CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Carmel, Indiana Docket No. : Petitioner: FINDINGS OF FAC! " SPECIAL USE (Ballot Sheet) . 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. DATED THIS D/W OF ,20 . Board Member PEge 7 :JT g - Sped-al Use p,pplic.atior. "" ....... \ \ \ \ '" "" ~ ,Lc.., ~L:~ ~,..-. - ::~ "'~ L~ ~~~ ;- ';~~; ':'!" ; L-"~ "" - I ~_;~..lI:iIIIIi~ ...."'" ~: "'"""; ~,: ;' ~'I - ~ .':':. ~ :;a.w.,: ____ TJII'!OTN:: ~ ;~: *'I~~~=: ~I~ "" - - ;.__ .;; ~ ~" ~ i ; ':':E!l ~ - ~... .. _ :I.l:;' 'r~;~ .. ,; '"'. ~ .. ' _. ' .. "' .. k _'~; ---'.i' ::! ~ _~ ......-'1. ---- . I .. ,-ll '!L":" EJ = ,-----J · . ~. ~ "'.::; ,,' I ~"- j ~; .~ ~~ I ~ ~.I!i " B~ J. . w..w, ....':.1 .. ~ , ~ ,. '':'" rm - '" ~.... \ ';-". - "" :':'.' - ~ " . llJ..!...OII< ~ ...; ---"g :I~ ; '" .. . ,_, :~-l.' ~. ,_ ) - .. ---J- f.:~;~'~~ ~:.;6'~1 ~ - '~_.~.~ - -.. I ::.'~~ ~,I~;~~:..t\\flI:.i,H=::'.... ~ ~"""'.w =::.' ..' b .'"' '" . , <Il'T . ~'~ :lo:, ~r.!~"IC ar _. _. ~ ''':.0::1' .... -. d --=- ~ ~: :;: l'..g-~ ,-' 0;;;.0:' .~~ l'::~r.;:~ - ." '. .I · - ,~~ '-: ., ., _ ~' _" . 5 ~ . ,. - . , f'''" - .~". . _,,,_, ..' ' _~' W'- ' = - ." , ' , -::_~"f"'" ~;...., f'l' ' ...~ -" \ 1>1 ",,;:; ,',' ""' ~~ ....,=~. . ..",. I--"-- ., ., -- '8' ."", ~, ~'. ' ;; '. _ " -. i ,'" I"' ..."',' ~. . .. i i "" . . ' ~ ,_ I ,,-' · . ~. - , . · · 'I ~. , · ~ ;~ ~ ~;.:-- ~ ~ :~':'~~~ ;~_~ ;r;~ ~ .:~: . .~M.;; ,.~i ,; ~'. "I; 00"" i ~; ,~. ~. !,j I ~l;J!,XT1!f ,~. " 'iC" ", '." · ~, -=-~):~' D' ".; ~ j~j.='!;:i':'j 1# "',' "; \. ',:; r? .i... "", , '- r-;I; ~, :: -',r:":"~~ ~ :: '.<~FF; :: 1 '-['1 m "~ ~; L I ~' ---s:.... i ~ ,- --Ii ~ n, .~ :-- " _ ., -..- m' ~ , .- ~ .:-~. " ,.., ..'" ;.j';; - ~" ""-,,, --=--'dJ .. .. ,~," '-, I ~ 'j; ,.- ._- ,~,,-}.-.;- BCF ;~.~~;fi) ;;;'~"~: ~: '\ ,;:, .. I ,.,. :.: "::'. ;;. :;,'.: :; "~lW _ .... .. ..,,-, ",,,. j ~'r--- " . .,. "' '. '. " n _ .... I !~'" , .. .0. .... _' -=' ~ ." -'" ~., ,.'. ," :i" , _" ",::;. """'" ::I;~. ~''''';;' ~ :: ~ C"' . ...,....' <" ." .,.' ., ..n . ....~. "'" ",._." "H" ,,~~.' ~~. '.,' .." '.' - .. . - ~!pr;'" H...;~I ~" ..~-.;'" 'I r~::;, s'~"1k>l.-- 'r-i ,~., T I ". ..." ,., " , ".:" '. .'" "." ,- . ~ ;:: '!~W:'''' ""i ~; .:-; f'll!I; '" ",,1 lL' - &V' J --,-f -. n _.' ~,::;..:. .. -... .~, ':-" ' ."', ,'~ '. .. " ". ' EJ J"'-- ~ EJ .. · .-' .. .. '- .. - "" _" .n ,. · .. . ;,t~I"' :;...;;,.... - ---> ' Q!';~~m'f:.~"" TI-' _.'-"--IL....__. -..----. r~l L=-.I;I__"i,":;'."~;~'l!_1:: ~U:,T;" -. - '.:;. . ,. ," 0" ..., il 1-' -", - "'; . '" . " ~ _~ ~ ~,taI~.~ D .;; il~1 ""'~. ., ,-..+':'" 'n.."~ ~ ill-I.. ",= _ \ .... "I",~ ~..",~,~,..I;,1:.. :. .. ,,- ~~ ;~:' ,-:;, "" ..~ i""'i I To ~Ml'" ..,:r. . .. .w'.:I_~' I',:: :~,::.j,;, ~. '-- \c-i... _' .. , ff-H~' .". tl .. T . :'11_ ~ M,;; -.". rA A~C"'-::" 1 " ~:~ ,. = =, - .. ~"".. ,~ -1I 0 P " I~' ",_ · ...........,...... .'''.- -' f-}' :: -- . .. =, -.. I 8rn'~,"'.. ""0'" .~. :u~-t,"1 -<,~~pj.~~""\"'~'" '~:-:"lli:'~~H' :1',1 ...~ '.,,,. .-\"" ,-- .- - .'" ..,~..",..,: ~," ",".. - -. ". ._.' ' .~ ~.. __..' ." 0 . . ;c,C ~ ,,:,' '.. .. _ OJ . ., _ ; ~.~. .. :'. . .'-::' " ." ,= ". OJ . .. '2'''' 8,,",-- "'. :~.~"."~ ~ '.,.' ~hf' ."....'''''''' - ,--- . "" __~. ,,_, . _. ,...,' /__... '._; ,.~........ '" ~.~ ",'" "~ ...~u I'"" .,' , '-"-' .~.'..' __" ,"" ' ? .. ," ". .. ". .." .. u 1_ ~_lI:El:_l'! ~.. ,,=, Firr" . " .. ,:.'" ,.;;,' --" _ .'0'.' .._.' -- ' .. - -- .It~l.wil~~%~ ,..." . . o' -- ,c.. . - 'C...cc ." --'. . '-=. " .. .' - .. -- ... .,.,,...__ ,,' .. I~ '., ,. ..~\" .-. '.= '. ,,-,,- ~'...j-.-:.:-:"i IIll.l 'eM ~ ..; . __, " .- :;-.'--"""-' i'" I,,, "S"- -" . " ".y ,:.." -, ~ " " .', ", J _ ... .. ~. I." - -" JY .. ,...... .. .___~ ,,' ~_L.:" _' ".' . ... , '0' ", ,. . . "''' '. (' t.. \-, -I uB. IGl- 14 , . . =4'1 " , C--""! ~ ;/~L .. ,j.. " ~ "~-:;--;f~" -, ~ ~i . 'I ~)I . ~ :-, '" El.1 -:::.' ,;/}'PE:7""" I~ " ..' " __', ~' ."" .. _,,, ". / .J" .. . ~o~ - ,. ,_' '_ , "! . ._; .1 ~ I .- i ...' .. .. .=' Il :"1 :~ I' l~, J-I" ~ I~ ~" w : 1 n." · ,.,. ""~~~ loS-MOo ~"( ~ p-",'" T ~'~ ~ 1 T ~ 1:-:: - ':':'..:. ~. lal ~ --~ "'- rll(]o:r;Y ..mI ~.11 I I ".-r I t- T '"' .ui., , I ci '" . ,~i ! ~~.. \ _\ ~ I ., , " '" ,aI = .... ~ -II!. ~/I~ .' = " ' ",-'\., I~~ - o! u u CARMEUCLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No.: Petitioner: Carmel Clay Schools FINDINGS OF FACT. DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the .community because: See Attached. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: See Attached. 3. The strict application of th~terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: See Attached. DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Developmental Standards Variance Docket No. is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this day of ,20 CHAIRPERSON, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals SECRETARY, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals Conditions of the Board are listed on the back. (Petitioner or his representative to sign). S :\carmelclaylanduseregs\checklis t\devstand app . Revised 10117/2000 . Page B of 8 -. Developmental Standards Variance Application u u CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: The overall building heights are dictated by the required size of the additions to support the increased student population and the functions included within the additions. Keeping the building additions compact and near the existing building will minimize the visual impact of the addition on adjacent properties. The proposed additions are also similar in height to other portions of the existing building and will be below the highest portion of the-existing building. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: The main building additions along the northwest remain approximately 280 feet from adjacent properties at the closest point. This is a greater distance than the current configuration. Currently, there is an area between 190 and 260 feet from the existing building to adjacent properties. This separation will help minimize the visual impact of the three-story addition. The height of the building will improve visui31 screening and sound screening of roof-mounted mechanical equipment currently open to the adjacent properties. 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: The strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would greatly increase the building footprint supporting a student capacity desired for this Project. This increase in building footprint would not fit within the property owned by Carmel Clay Schools. The strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would also reduce functionality of some spaces in the building program. u u CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Carmel, Indiana Docket No. : Petitioner: Carmel Clay Schools. FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheet) 1. 2. 3. DATED THIS DAY OF ,20 Board Member Page 7 of 8 .. Daveiopmental Slandards Variar,ce Application u FAX NO. 317 571 2426 U P. 01 I'lVV-~'~iUUj IUt UJ: JU t'tl GHKI1tL GUMMUNlTY SVCS ',/!/III-~~ \I!II~' I Of C-'i.c-,. ~. ')\ ~--- ".-----~' ~%~. @~v:/ j~. ~'. @ tl::- ~\ ~ ~ ~ g (~._ .J ) ~/ ~ , \~~>::~~4~\~~ ~ 'ION CS~ffl~!1 .~;1IIJ/rIJl CITY OF CARMEL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES Division of Planning & Zoning LET T E R of G RAN T 27 November 2001 Michael A. Grubb Paul 1. Cripe, Inc. 7172 Graham Road Indianapolis, IN 46250 Re: Carmel High School at 520 East Main Street Developmental Srandards Variances (V-li5-0J through V-160-01) Via US Mail &fax (317/841-4798) Dear Mr, Grubb, At the meeting held Monday, November 26, 2001, the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals took the following action regarding the Developmental Standards Variance petitions ftled by yourself on behalf of the Carmel/Clay School Corporation: Sign #1: APPROVED: DocJ\,et No. V-US-OI, a petition to vary Section 25,7.01-2: Definitions: TFAFFIC DJRECTJON..4L SIGN of the Sign OrdL."1ance in order to establish a four-foot-tall (4') Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petItlon. A.PFROVED: Docket No. V-U6-01, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions' TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SrGN of tb.e Sign Ordmunce in order to establish a 17.6-square-foot Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. "* Please be ~wl\re that Sign #1 will also require Board of Public Works fJ..p.pnJYRl as it is located within the East Mnin Street right-or-way. . CDntact Dick Hill with the Depa.rtment of Engineering at 317/571-2441 regarding this ma tter. . ONE crVIC SQU.A.RE CARMEL. lNDL,.o.Nl\. 46032 317/571-2417 NOV-27-2001 TUE 01: 10 PM CARMEL COMMUNITY SVCS U FAX NO. 3175712426 U p, 02 Page 2 Docket Nos. V-115-0l through V-16o..01 Sign #2: APPROVED: Docket No. V-117-01, a petition to vary Section 25.101-2.' Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SiGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 4' 3"-ta11 Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition, APPROVED: Docket No. V-118-01, a petition to vary Section 25. 7.01-2: DefinUtons: TR.-1FF1C DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish an 8.428-square~foot Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. Sign #3: APPROVED: DocketNo. V-119-01, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 5' 10"-tal] Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. APPROVED: Docket No. V-120~Ol, a petition to vary Section 25~7.01-2: Definitions: TR4FFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 5,656-square-foot Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. Sign #4: APPROVED: Docket No. V-I21-01, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a four-foot-taU (4') Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed., thereby approving the petition. APPROVED: Docket No. V-122-01, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 9.852-square-foot Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. Sign #5: APPROVED: Docket No. V.123-01, a. petition to Val)' SectIon 25.7. 02-5(c): Maximum Sign Area, (ii): Changeable Copy Sign, of the Sign Ordinance in orderto establish a 32.5-sql.W'e-foot Changeable Copy Sign. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. ' ONE CIVIC SQUARE CAR.,\ffiL, INDiANA 4G032 317/571-2417 NOV-27~2001 rUE 01 :10 PM CARMEL COMMUNITY SVCS U FAX NO. 317. 571 2426 U P. 03 Page '3 Docket Nos. V-lIS-Ol through V-I60-01 APPROVED: Docket No. V";124-01, a petition to vary Section 25.7. 02-5(d): Maximum Height of Ground Sigri, of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 7' lO.S"-tall Ground Sign. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (O) opposed, thereby approving the petition. APPROVED: Docket NQ. V-US-Ol, a petition to vary Section 25.7.02-5(e): Location, (I): Residential Zone, of the Sign Ordinance in crder to establish a zero-foot (0') Sign Setback. The Board voted hve (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. APPROVED: Docket No. V-126-01. a petition to vary Section 25.7.02-5(0; Landscaping, of the Sign Ordinance in order to forego landscaping the GrOll..Tld Sign. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. Please be aware that Sign #5 will require a Sign Permit. Contact Dawn Pattyn with the Department of Community Services at 317/571~2417 regarding this matter. Sign #6: APPROVED: Docket No. V-127-01. a petition to vary Secl"ion25.7.02-5(c): Maximum Sign Area, (i): Institutional Sign of the Sign OrdinlUloe in order to establish an 88-square-foot Institutional Sign. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. Please be aware that Sign #6 will require a Sign Permit. Contact Dawn Pattyn with the Department of Community Senices at 317/571-2417 regarding this matter. Sign #7: APPROVED: Docket No. V-128-01, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a four-fooHall (4 ') Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in fa,vor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. APPROVED: Docket No. V~129-01, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions; TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 2] . 272-square-foot Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. ,ON-:B CIVIC SQUARE Cl\.R.MEL. I[<..'DL'\Ni'. 46032 317/571-2417 NDV-27-2001 TUE 01: 11 PM CARMEL COMMUNITY SVCS U FAX NO, 317 571 2426 U p, 04 Page 4 Docket Nos. V-llS-OJ through Y-160-01 Sign #8: APPROVED: Docket No. V-l30-01, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2.. Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign: Ordinance in order to establish a four-foot-tall (4') Traffic Directional Sign on site. TI,le Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. APPROVED; Docket No. V-131-01, a petition to vary Section 25. 7.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 3.956-square-foot Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. Sign #9: APPROVED: Docket No. Y-132-01, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a four-foot-tall (4') Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. '. APPROVED; Docket No. V-133-0l, a petition to vary Seciiof1 25.7.01-2: Dejinitions:.::TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a ] 4. 188-square-foot Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed. thereby approving the p~ti~. . Sign #10: APPROVED; Docket No. V-134-01, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions: TR4.FF'IC DIRECTIONAL SIGN or the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a four-foot-tall. (4') Traffic Directional Sign oil site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition, APPROVED: Docket No. V-135-01, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions: TRA.FFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 14.1 88-square-foot Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. . Sign #11: APPROVED: Docket No. V.136-01, a petition to vary Section 25,7.01-2: Definilions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 5.444~sqT.lare~foot Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL. INDIANA 46032 31 i /571-2417 NOV-21-2001 rUE 01 :11 PM CARMEL COMMUNITY SVCS' U FAX NO, 317 571 2426 U p, 05 Page 5 Docket Nos. V-115-0l through V-160-0l Sign #12: APPROVED: Docket No. V-137-0l, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 5.444-squa:re-foot Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. Sign #13: APPROVED: Docket No. V-138-01, a petit1onto vary Section 25,7.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sigil Ordirumce in order to establish a 4' 4"-tall Tra!'9ic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. APPROVED: Docket No. V-139-01, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIP.ECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 13.970-square-foot Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. Sign #14: APPROVED: Docket No. V-140.01~ a petition to vary Section 25.7.02~5(b): N14mber & Type, (i): Institutional Sign, in order to establish five (5) Institutional Signs on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. Please be aware that Sign #5 will require a' Sign Permit.Contllct Dawn Pattyn with the Depart.-nent of Community Services at 317/5.71~2417 regarding this matter. Sign #15: ' APPROVED: Docket No. V~141K01,a petition to vary Section 25. 7.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a S.444-square-foot Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition, Sign #16: APPROVED: D{lcket No. V-142-01, a petition to vary Section 25. 7,01-2: D~finitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTiONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 5,444-square-foot Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted fiye (5) in favor, zerO (0) opposed, thereby approvLl1g the petition. ONE CIVlCSQVARE Ci'.RMEL, lNDL..NA 46032 317/571-2417 NOV-27-200] TUE 0]: 11 PM CARMEL COMMUNITY SVCS U FAX NO, 317 571 2426 U p, 06 Page 6 Docket Nos, VwllS.OI through Y-160-01 Sign #17; APPROVED: Docket No. V-143-01, a petition to vary Section 25. 7.01-~: Definitions: TR4.FFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 5.444-square-footTraffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. Sign #18: APPROVED: Docket No. V-144-01, a petition to.vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definirion:;' TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 5.444-square-foot Traffic Directional Sign on site. Tne Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposedl thereby approving the petition. Sign #19: APPROVED: Docket No. V-145-01, a petition to vary Section 25. 7.01-2: Definiriom: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 5.444-square-foot Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition, Sign #20: APPROVED: Docket No. V-146-01, a petition to vary Sectiol1 257.02-5(c). Maximum Sign . A.rea, (i): Insfitutional Sign, in order to establish a 33-square"foot Institutional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. Please be aware that Sign #5 will require R Sign Permit. Contact Dawn Pattyn with the Department of Community Services at 317/571-2417 regarding this matter. Sign #21: APPROVED: Docket No. V-147-:01, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to .establish a 5.444-square-foot Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. . ONE ClvlC SQUARE CAR.ivrEL. L~DIANA. 46032 317/571-2417 NOV-27-2001 TUE 01: 12 PM CARMEL COMMUNlTY SVCS W FAX NO, 317 ~71 2426 U p, 07 Page 7 Docket Nos. V-115-01 through V-160-01 Sign #22: APPROVED: Docket No. V-I 48-01 , .a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTiONAL SIGN of the: Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 5.444-square-foot Traffic Dir:eotional Sign on sile. The Board voted five (5) in favor; zero CO} opposed, thereby approving me petition. Sign #23: APPROVED: Docket No. V~149-01, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order 10 establish a 5.444-square-foot Traffic Direotional Sign on site, The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition, Sign #24:" *Note: Sign #24 is completely covered by Docket No. V-UO-OJ Please be aware that Sign #24 will require 2 Sign Permit. Contact Dawn Pattyn with the Department of Community Services at 311/571-2417 regarding this matter. Sign #25: Al':PROVED: Docket No. V-150-01, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: DCffinilions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordin_ance "in order to establish a 3' 9"-tal1 Traffic Directional Sign On site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. APPRO~D: Docket No. V-151-01, a petition to vary See/ion 25. 7.0J~2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 5.386-square-foot Traffic " Directional Sign on site, The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) apposed, thereby approving the petition. Sign #26: APPROv"ED: Do-cket No: V-1S2-Ol, a petition to vary Section 25.7. OJ -2: Definitions: TR4.FFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 4' 4".tall Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted the (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. APPROVED: Docket No. V-153-0l, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 26.480-square-foot Tra..-Ific Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the. petition. ONE. CIVIC SQUlll'-..E U...RMEL, INDL-'\.NA 4-6032 317/571-2417 NOV-27-2001 rUE Oi :12 PM CARMEL COMMUNITY SVCS U FAX NO. 317 571 2426 U P. 08 Page 8 Docket Nos. V-lIS-0t through Y-160-01 Sign #27: APPROVED: Docket No. V-154-01, a petition to vary See/ion 25.7.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 6' 5"-tal! Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. APPROVED: Docket No. V-155~Ol, 8. petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SiGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a lO.699-square-foot Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. Sign #28 APPROVED: Docket No, V-156, a petition to vary Seclion 25.7.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAl SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 6' 5"-tall Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. APPROVED: Docket No. V~157-01, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01.2: Definitions: TRAFFIC . DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a lO.699-square-foot Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. Sign #29: APPROVED: Docket No. V-158-01, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SiGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 6' 5".tall Traffic Directional Sign on site. Tne Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petitiOtL APPROVED: Docket No. V-159-01, a petition to vary Section 25.701-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTiONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a IO.699-square-foot Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition, Sign #30: APPROv"ED: Docket No., V-160-01, a petition to vary Section 25.7.02-5(c): Maximum Sign Area, (i): Institutional Sign, of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a lOO-square-foot Institutional Sign. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. Please be aware that Sign #30 will require a Sign Permit. Contact Dawn Pattyn with the Department of Community Services at 317/571-2417 regarding this matter. ONE erne SQUARE CARi\lliL, rNDl!',-~A 46032 317/571-241i ':: t , , NOV-27-2001 TUE 01:12 PM' CBRMEl COMMUNfTY SVCS , U P. 08 FAX NO. 317 ~]1 2426 U Page 9 Docket Nos, V.US-O! through V-160-01 The following sign requires Board of Public Works approval: Sign #1. 111e following signs require Sign Permits; Sign #5, Sign #6, Sign #14, Sign #20, Sign N24, and Sign #30. When applying for Sign Pennits for this structure; please include a copy of this letter with your application materials in order to assist the Department's review. If I can he of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 317.571.2417. Sincerelv. :9- cj~. Lillig, Jr. Planning & Zoning Administrator Department of Corrununity Services Cc: Ramona Hancock. BZA Secretary Michael P. Hollibaugh, DOCS, Director Jeff Kendall, DOCS, Building Commissioner Dawn Pattyn, DOCS) Sign Permit Review Dick Hill) Department of Engineering Ron Farrand, Facilities & Transportation Director) Carmel/Clay Schools (jax: 3 J 7/571- 9659) ONE OviC SQUARE CARMEL, INDliLNA 46032 31i/571-2417 I;~i-=- ~~ -----=--;.-~~t1cI"" "'I~~!mltl" Ir ... I,.., t-;: :~";;J5I 'i~,"t~;! ;; ;,~ ,.. ",' ~~ . ~ ~ "' l' . G ~ ~~. ,;: t ._~. ii ~ ------,~ t~ '-', ~ ,,'" :, 3,' ~ .- -li" ~_,('!'m/'" ~~ ~ ~ ~I DII I.~.n.'? _\-; . Do. IiIl. -;-lm~'"':;~Y~~{i~2~ ~ -i;-, '~f- El'~~-~7~1,~: I~t~'I,;,r::7 ~ "I~: ,. ~;,: i'I'" .-:,--- '~~ \;~-'~:.. n;:, ~~~\:';;! ii != I ~ '~:".., .- ~;<" :;- ~=j~i'~---'~! :,;' :~-:: .' :~II~__ ----;;;" ":'I~: i -:,1 "" ,,'" ,'" ~ . rs:r'. ~ Wo., :., ,,~,.;' " ~' I! '::~'I!;:;; I!:' ~\m a I "" ~! '~~ :"~,'" I'~'~ ..#.".~ ,:r: '!~;"~'A" 'I' ,,::.:::' ',.. "" .~'. 1 .. j).~n ' r" ...' - - - '....:...::" / f In~" I ........- liJ' \ \-,'" ,':; ../ ~,\. "'!~. ,:,......,' l-~~I ~ If.l-'~\~ ~! '= ~;: IIfI ~i.Jr:J ~,'''~ Rtl ~\ -:. ~. I ~...=~,CDJ ..." nw 1_ , .",;,*":':, Wi I. ... ~ I-;!." ... ,~ -" .., . "" . ~ 13 . "",,;;;, ,11\11 _. .',. l;; ,.", .~. ," -::~. .. ,.';; ~ ',j _ . . ,~ !~l ~I ~ ~ :,~,~~=!O;:. . ;:"'._I~- ~ .:,~,~ ~,~' !",,,. ~r- _ '- '"._ "".. .,... to.,... &"f'"l7~. - -Q '" ~ !m"r3 ;'~1~!!:!,~1~19 mI -=-:.. ...:.. .',1'-'1:' ,.: ~~I,~~'; ,;; '. f< '. ,,",. - 1-;"" I .~ '~~ -i::T""1-..: ~ ~~ ~""'--;:= ~,.",~~":' ,~- ':::_~.: ;;" ~;1;":..~i!~-!~!'!:,'. :/T,',."" r '~~, "~'H~"+-~ -;: ~ 1 ':,,~:I!~,,~ ~ !~I'~! ;':'!b': ~ ~"..." .- .- ... ~ I' ": 1'" '-.." H~ ~ '..: I;~"! .~!r~ ~!;;: ~~ ,~ !: ~ ' .. ,. .. J --- 0 = "" """ -m'b ~ ~.~, ~ ]~. "'-I;";'~'- "-"1"-' ':rf'-J tt.~~~;:-l :~-" ~ ~~I} ~~ l ';;:~ ,~;; ~" ::~~ '-~H;'I~ ' ~~ '" m "" "" ~ "" or. '" 1 I .:i'l · "--'----; m '" 'm "" "" .'.. ! ~. 7' ''::''''^o-.) .-.. ".." '... ~ ~ /' .. H~ , .. ~"""ii i~ 'I' ~.. :: r;;' -' ".,";" "~t :;",~...'~ ..;:! ~;.:;, .' ,-~.;;- ~"'] .~~'~' - .... r~ :;1 ~ \:~.; :r'l' ~ ';;i::~ -. '" -. ~'riI "" ---cc.- ._ '''''' '" "'.' _ ""~I' "" ~.~ .0"....-" ,- "',' ,w ,,:- '_.. I' ~ .;- ~ .,., ~ ".--, ' _ 'U ~ /'{.j~ ,.'.(~,~t~~~ JL..""'--"";} ~l~1;~.:~.i?~~.~: '_~~ J ~~ - r..., ... , --:- 11 ~ ':. "" _j i ... !~'! ',., .. ...,., ~=-. "" , .;--{.------..... -,.- '..': ... ~ 'I~ : ~ I ~~ I~ :; l~ ~- .' ~. ;: 'I' ... I 'i: !~. ~ ~ ~ ar m I.":.' I~ r--i::,.. '/::'. - r---... 'l. = . , !: ... ~ ~ ~~- ... _ ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ ! K: r- 'ft '" . :;;;~!. ~. 'C' I-;;- :.:.i ' . 'li{"'" ~. ... ,~_ ;;r;"1'"1' ,! ' '" " ',~ -.- , - 'c:.. ::, ." ='=' ; ::: _ ~ ;~;: ~j(~; "'r.om' : ~ ,,~ ~ a'oo !! , DO ... .,.,....'-.:1 =--- _..... ._..., ..~=r.T:... ~. lJi.'.' ..... I no i_ ~-I'~ - '"',' -''''<1: ''''' " ~ . I. ..~ -J- ",. ,_ ,. " " "~ "-' .: r .~ ! ! ?7~ ~~ ..~~ .".", l' \3 '.. ;~ .. ..",. .~~ ~ ~n: ~ ~;I ;-f' .:c~<:,:! " '--"'rp'- ~""c i3; J . '. - ,'ll":1,-:;,: ~ : -:': : l_. 1_. !';';:/!;:i!;:/!:; l.... 7.,:,.., ,j ~~,"'f! ...~u!. ~ ~ : , I'm o im.JOO - __ ' I "" ') .." _ _ ",;; _ I~ ~:.; ; :: ~ ~ . ~~' " -",,;.;....,,;. -..-.1 - -;;; -;;; ,&:: ,-l..:" ~ ~-~'-, ' . '----1 ~ -.(3 .i ~ ~ ~ \ i -.- -:i";; 'I~~' ~ ~. . '7 ~, , '" - '--. ~:;.: r----..~, -, ---1' -:: I~ "if:..,";r ..:. ',~ \ - '" ~t ~ ' !~- ,:, :~; ~;, '; ,~ ~. .L:. / ~!:'; I:' ~ -::- ' .-.- ~ 'c>P3 ).."",0\-1-$ I' -.:; " <\ JZ -;. ti oW " ,? ~iU ~ t~O ........,.,.", ., 'co ~ 1'_:: ~ -<~~ \. ~ ~ ~ .- '!:. b. ;;, <: ~ - = ,- .. ~. ~' ~~ -. "" ~ .. .. "" ~. , "': -...' ,:,.. ~ ~,M:j:~ ; 'i:: "r~~ ,!m;-;--: I'; 'R' : ~ ~ ,. ' . '.'! m ! ..~, ! fu " ; f"'~'2 ; \.':' ';: '..;'~"',\ ~~ OJ';;, _~ ~ [j' _-:-.~ !:t1~~U2'lm^]:~-mr1iV'l ~"'-:-.....<<T9I~ ~.~~~...:"!. 1 ~lll1l'... ~ "1 ~.-. ... .1............ ._...~~~ ~ 9P. - I .. [3~'. om~ .<ft,,:\;,; ;';I!;;r~ !,;, .~,! . l' ~ ",H ,3 - - :~;= ~"~'~ : ~~ ~~~ur ~. :~Ii. ':I~: 1:-;; =l~J'it.i; G . L." .... '" '" '" .:;;, 1~ ~~ rn I f /~/1 LJ u l.J CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No.: Petitioner: Carmel Clay Schools FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the.public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: See Attached. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: See Attached, 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: See Attached. DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Developmental Standards. Variance Docket No. is granted, subject to any'conditions stated in the minutes of this Board, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this day of ,20 CHAIRPERSON, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals SECRETARY, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals Conditions of the Board are listed on the back. (Petitioner or his representative to sign). S :\carmelclaylan duseregs\checklist\devs tandap p Revised 10/1712000 Page B of B.. Developmental Slancards Variance Application u u CARMEUCLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: The additional signs will help identify the various specific areas of the Freshman Center and Carmel High School. The multiple signs will help ensure that patrons and visitors enter at the proper location and avoid confusion and potential security concerns. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance wil) not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: The institutional and wall signs will be similar to the signage already installed at Carmel High School. 'The proposed signs are lettering without specific designs or special lighting effects. These signs would not adversely affect adjacent properties. 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: Without the additional signage, areas of the building would not be identifiable for patrons or visitors approaching the building. A building of this size and scope requires areas and entrances to be identifiable from the exterior. The signs will allow users to find parking area near the entrance they desire, and to avoid traveling through the building to reach specific areas. The various signs will also assist building administration with security issues by directing patrons and visitors to specific entrances that can be supervised. All other entrances are typically inaccessible from the exterior in an educational facility, Previous approved variances for the Carmel High School campus have supported these issues and allowed multiple institutional signage to be erected on the campus. u u CARMEUCLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Carmel, Indiana Docket No. : Petitioner: Carmel Clay Schools FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheet) . 1. 2. 3. DATED THIS DAY OF ,20 Board Member Pa.e 7 of 8.. Oevelopmental Standards VaManee Application ;"'~ . ~ rr,ol I~UV-~ r -t::'UU j IUt. U!; I U r'f1 GI-lKf1U GU!1f1UN 1 TY SVCS U FAX NO. 317 571 2426 U p, 01 ....;1....- , .. '1J,1f/.f{/J$/~~. . ~\\ljli6: st..Q:tI?~-::-:.- ~\v~;/ . "~~, ~ he J~ ~ I"O~ ))., \~., '"._.-.-/,~ ~Q' ~ - ~ 4;-:f.----..-o ",;~\\~ ~~J;!l11!/M CITY OFCA MEL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES Division of Planning & Zoning LET T E R of G RAN T 27 November 2001 Michael A. Grubb Paul L Cripe, lnc. 7172 Graham Road Indianapolis, IN" 46250 Re: Carmel High School at 520 East Main Street Dr;:velopmenral Srandards Variances (V-l15-01 through V-160-0 I) Via US Mail &fax (317/841-4798) Dear Mr. Grubb, At the meeting held Monday, November 26, 2001, the CarmellClay Board of Zoning Appeals took the follov.ring action regarding the Developmental Standards Variance petitions filed by yourself on behalf of the Carmel/Clay School Corporation: Sign #1: APPROVED: Docket No. V-1l5-01, a petition to vary Section 25.701-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordirumce in order to establish a fOill-foot-tall (4') Tr~-Ffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. APPROV.El>: Docket No. V-1l6-01, a petition to vary Seclion 25.7.01-2: Definitions' TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinunce in order to establish a 17.6-sguare-foot Traffic Directional Sign on site. The .Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. "* Please be aware that Sign #1 will also require Board of Public Works ap..pxonJ as it is Jocated within the East Main Street right~of-way. . Contact Dick Hill with the Department of Engineering at 317/571-2441 regarding this matter. ONE CIVIC SQUARE C.-\RIvrEL, n-JDLII.NA 4-6032 317/571.2417 ~ NOV-27-2001 rUE 01:10 PM CARMEL COMMUNITY SVCS U FAX NO. 317 S71 2426 U P. 02 ~ Page 2 , Docket Nos. V-US-Ol through V-I 60..01 Sign #2: APPROVED: Docket, No. Y-117-01, a petition to vary Section 25.701-2.' Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 4' 3"-tall Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. APPROVED: Docket No, V-1l8-01, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definftions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish an 8.428-square-foot Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) oppos~ thereby approving the petition. Sign #3; APPROVED: Docket.No. V-119-01, a petition to vary Section 25. 7.01~2.' Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to eStablish a 5' IO"-tal] Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. APPROVED: Docket No. V-120-0I, iO\ petition to vary Section 25.' 7. 01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 5.656-square-foot Traffic Directional Sign on site, The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. Sign #4: APPROVED: Docket No. V-121-01, a petition to vary Sec:tion 25.7.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a fom-foot-tall (4') Traffic Directional Sign on site. ~e Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. APPROVED: Docket No. V-122-0!, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions.' TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 9.852-square-foot Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor.zeto (0) opposed, thereby approving l~e petition. Sign #5: APPROVED: Docket No. Y.123-01, a petition to vary Section 25,7,02-5(c): Maximum Sign Area, (ii): Changeable Copy Sign, of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 32.5-square-foot Changeable Copy Sign. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition, ' ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDLA..Nl\ 46032 317/571-2417 iF NOV-27-2001 rUE 01: 10 PM CA.RMEL COMMUNITY SVCS U FAX NO. 31~71 2426 p, 03 -'. . , Page 3 Docket Nos. V-llS-01 through V-160-01 .APPROYED: Docket No. V~124~Ol, a petition to vary Section 25.7. 02-5(d): Maximum Height of Ground Sign, of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 7' 1 O.5"~tall Ground' Sign. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. APPROVED: Docket No. Vw12S-01, a petition to vary Section 25.7.02-5(e): Location, (i): Residential Zone, of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a zero-foot (0') Sign Setback. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. APPROVED: Docket No. V-126-01, a petiiion to vary Sf;;ction 25, i.02-5(i): Landscaping, of the Sign Ordinance in order to forego landscaping the Ground Sign. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. Ple~se be aWllre tha.t Sign #5 will require a Sign Permit, Contact Dawn Pattyn with the Department of Community Services . at 317/571-2417 regarding tbis matter. Sign #6: APPROVED: Docket No. V-127-01,fl petition to vary Secrjon25,7.02.5(c): Maximum Sign Area, (i): Institutional Sign of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish an 88-square-foot Institutional Sign. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the . petition. Please be aware that Sign #6 will require a Sign Permit. Contact Dawn Patf)'D with the Department of Community Sen"ices at 317/571-2417 regarding this matter. Sign #7: APPROVED: Docket No. VM128-01, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a four-fooHall (4 ') Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. APPROVED: Docket No. V~129-01, a petition to vary Section 25,7.01-2: De.finitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 2] .272..sqWlre-foot Traffic DirectiOnal Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the pention. ON"E CIVIC SQUi\.RE CAR."I\iEL, INDLWA 46032 317/571-2417 ,- ~. . . . NOV-27-2001 rUE 01: 11 PM CARMEL COMMUNITY SVCS U p, 04 FAX NO, 317 571 2426 U Page 4 Docket Nos. V-lIS-Ol through Y-160-01 Sign #8: APPROVED: Docket No. V-130-OI, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions.' TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign: Ordinance in order to establish a. four-foot-tall (4') Traffic Directional Sign on site. 1l.1e Board voted five (5) in faYor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. APPROVED: Docket No. V-13t-Ol, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 3,956-square-foot Traffic Directional Sign en site. The Board voted five (5) in favo!, zero (0) opposed, thereby appro"ing the petition. . Sign #9: APPROVED: Docket No. Y-132-01, a petition to vary SeCtion 25.7.01-2: D~finitions,' TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a four-foot-taU (4') Traffic Directional Sign on site, The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition, APPROVED; Docket No. V-133-0l, a petitionto vary Section 25.701-2: Definilions:';:TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a ] 4.1 88-square- foot -traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. Sign #10: APPROVED; Docket No. V~134-01, a petition to vary Section 25,7.01-2,' Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a fDur-foot-tall. (4') Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition, APPROVED: Docket No. V-135-01, a petition to vary Section 25. 7.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish. a 14.188-square-foot Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition, Sign #11: APPROVED: Docket No. V-136-01, a petition to vary Section 25,7.01-2: Definilions: TRAFFlC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 5.444-:square~foot Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571-2417 NOV-27-2001 TUE 01 :11 PM CARMEL COMMUNITY SVCS U FAX NO. 317 571 2426 U P. 05 :? Page 5 Docket Nos. V-US-Ol through V~160-01 Sign #12: APPROVED: Docket No. V~137-01, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 5.444-square-foot Traffic Directional Sign on site, The Board voted five (5) in favor. zero (0) opposed, thereby apptoving the petition. Sign #13: APPROVED: Docket No. V-138-0l, a petltionto vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sigri Ordinance in order to establish a 4' 4"-tall Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. APPROVED: Docket No. V-139-01, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions' TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 13.970-square-foot Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. Sign #14: APPROVED: Docket No. V-140~Ol, a petition tovary Section 25. 7.02-5(b): Number & T;ype, (i): Institutional Sign, in order to establish five (5) Institutional. Signs on site, The Board voted [Lve (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. Please be aware that Sign #5 will require a Sign Permit. Contltct Dawn Pattyn with the Department of Community Services at 317/571~2417 regarding this matter. Sign #15: APPROVED: Docket No. V-141~Ol, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC Dill.ECTJONAL SIGN of the Sign OrdinaIl.ce in order to establish a S.444-square-foot Traffic Directionai Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed~ thereby approving the petition. Sign #16: APPROVED: Docket No. V-142~Ol, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 5.444~square-foot Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted fiye (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approvhlg the petition. Ot-l'E CIVIC SQUl\llli CARMEL, INDfANA 46032 317/.571-2417 NOV-27-2001 TUE of: 11 PM QA~MEL COMMUNITY SVCS . U FAX NU 317 E71 2426 U p, 06 Q Page 6 Docket Nos. V-llS-01 through Y-160-01 Sign #17: APPROVED: Docket No. V-143-01, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions: TR.APFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 5.444-square-foot Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. Sign #18: APPROVED: Docket No. V-144-01. a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definition.s: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 5..444-square-foot Tmffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in ravor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. Sign #19: APPROVED: Docket No. V-145-01, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 5.444-square-foot Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) apposed, thereby approving the petition. Sign #20: APPROV"ED: Docket No. V-146-0l, a petition to vary Section 257.02-5(c): Maximum Sign Area, (i): InstiTutional Sign, in order to establish a 33-square~foot Institutional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. Please be aware that Sign #5 will require a Sign Permit. Contact D~wn Pattyn ""jtb the Department of Community Services at 317/571-2417 regarding this matter. Sign #21: APPROVED: Docket No. V~147-:01, a petitioI1 to vary Section 25.701-2: Definitions.. TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SiGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 5.444-square-foot Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. ONE CIVIC SQUARE CAR..\iEL. mDIANA 46032 317fS71-241i , . NDV-27-2001 TUE 01: 12 PM CARMEL COMMUNITY SVCS U FAX NO. 317 !=i71 2426 U P. 07 ,'""" Page 7 Docket Nos. V-115-01 through V-160-01 Sign #22; APPROVED: Docket No. V-148-01, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2; Definitions: TR4FFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of tho Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 5.444-square-foot Traffic Dir~ctional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. Sign #23 : APPROVED: Docket No. V-149-01, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance iri order to establish a 5A44~square-foot Traffic Direotional Sign on sHe. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. Sign #24:* *Note: Sign #24 is completely covered by Docket No. V-140-01 Please be aware that Sign #24 will require 3 Sign Permit. Contact Dawn Pattyn with the Department of Community Services at 317/571-2417 regarding this matter. Sign #25: APPROVED: Docket No. V-IS0-0i, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2; Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 3' 9"-taU Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. APPROVED: Docket No. V-151-Ol, a petition to vary Seclion 237.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 5.386-square-foot Traffic Directional Sign on site, The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. Sign #26: APPROVED: DQCket No.'V-152-01, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 4' 4"-tall Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted the (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed., thereby approving the petition, APPROVED: Docket No. V-153-01, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 26.480-square-foot Tra..~c Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zerQ (0) opposed, thereby approving the . petition. ONE CIVIC SQUARF; CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 31? /571-2417 . NOV-27-2001 rUE 01:12 PM CFRMEL COMMUNITY SVCS ,..," U , FAX NQ 317 ~71 2426 U p, 08 _ ~ ..t# Page 8 Docket Nos. V-115-01 through Y-160-01 Sign #27: APPROVED: Docket No. V~154-0i, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions' TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 6' 5"-tall Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) apposed, thereby approving the petition. APPROVED: Docket No. V-155-01, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a lO.699-square-foot Traffio Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. . Sign #28 APPROVED: Docket No. V-156, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 6' 5"-tall Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. APPROVED: Docket No. Y-157~Ol, a petition to vary section 25.7.01.2: DejinitiohS_' TRAFFIC DIRECTiONAL SIGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a ] O.699-square-foot Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favoTi zero (0) opposed, thereby apprming the petition. Sign #29: APPROVED: Docket No. V-158-0l, a petition to vary Section 25.701-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DJRECTIaNAL SiGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 6' 5"-tall Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. APPROVED: Docket'No. V~159-01, a petition to vary Section 25.7.01-2: Definitions: TRAFFIC DIRECTiONAL SiGN of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a lO.699-square-foot Traffic Directional Sign on site. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. Sign #30: APPROVED: Docket No. V-160-(l1, a petition to vary Section 25.7.02-5(c): Maximum Sign Area, (U: lnstitutfonal Sign, of the Sign Ordinance in order to establish a 1 OO-squ.are~foot Institutional Sign. The Board voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition. Please be aware that Sign #30 will require a Sign Permit. Contact Dawn Pattyn . with the Department of Community Services at 317!571~2417 regarding this matter. ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, !NDL'\J'\1A 46032 317 /5712417 ~ . NOV-27-2001 TUE 01:12 PM G~RMEL COMMUNITY SVCS i\- - U .' I . .. FAX NO, 3](.)71 2426 p, 08 .,!! ... Page 9 Docket Nos. V~115ROl through V-160-0l The following sign requires Board of Public Works approval: Sign #1. . The following signs require Sign Perrnits: Sign #5, Sign #6, Sign #14, Sign #20, Sign #24, and Sign #30. When applying for Sign Permits for this structure; please include a copy of this letter with your application materials in order to assist the Department's review. If I can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 317.571.24] 7. Sincerely, :9 q~. LHlig, Jr. Planning & Zoning Administrator Departinent of Community Services Cc: Ramona HaIJcock, BZA Secretary Michael P. Hollibaugh, DOCS, Director Jeff Kendall, DOCS, Building Commissioner Da\\rn Pattyn, DOCS, Sign Pennit Review Dick Hill, Department of Engineering Ron Farrand, Facilities & Transportation Directofl Carmel/Clay Schools (fax: 3 J 7/571- 9659) ONE avIC SQD.hRE CARMEL, lliDIA..."l-;rA 46032 317 /571~2417 (,J u CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No.: Petitioner: Carmel Clay Schools FINDINGS OF FACT. DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: See Attached. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a sUbstantially adverse manner because: See Attached. 3. The strict appllcaiion of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: See Attached. DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Developmental Standards Variance Docket No. is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this day of ,20 CHAIRPERSON, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals SECRETARY, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals Conditions of the Board are listed on the back. (Petitioner or his representative to sign), S :\carmel clayla nduseregs\checklis t\devstand ap p . Revised 1011712000 Page 6 01 6.. Developmental Standards Variance Application u u CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE 1. The approval of this variance will not be ihjurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: The size ofthe signage is appropriate'for the overall size of the site, and is similar to existing signs on the Carmel High School campus. The ground sign is not ioeated in an area where it will block any sightlines for traffic purposes. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: The signage is similar in size to existing signs on the Carmel High School property, and will not affect adjacent properties. The sign materials will be consistent with the proposed additions to Carmel High School, and other signs on the campus. 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: The size limitations for the ground sign would prohibit signage in a size that would be clearly legible from passing vehicles. The vast majority of patrons and visitors will be seeing this type of sign from their vehicle. It is also typical of a school this size to hold multiple events, and those events require places for announcements. Information to facility patrons and visitors would be limited due to the strict application of the size limitations. u u CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Carmel, Indiana Docket No. : Petitioner: Carmel Clay Schools FINDINGS OF FACT- DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheet) "1. 2. 3. DATED THIS DAY OF ,20 Board Member PEg. 7 of 8 -- DevB!opm<>r.ldl SlaMards Vari.oce Application _ '~',..' '. "'" "'" " ~- ,,~ . I:m y....Y Y.~ ~.. -rm ......-nm1l:I ~ ~ ~ ...... ~~ .... m ! ~. ~ ! ~~ : ~~ if ~ 'C' ~~ ~ , I I I ---.. ~ . -, 11111'1:('; ~ ,_. -.::0 ~ < 'm1I ~ ! ~! hr , , ,'. '... ~'l~ ~ ~ "--"~r-, ,.... '-'. '" ~~,,~.~ "'iJ'_. J'" I .;;-I,~ f~~,~ ,', i '~l; r~-' ~-:B' : ' -, . 31~! , ~"I OM ---,"'-, ~"..., .... ...~, , -om'! ~ I I = --..--...". ; f\E-J~ < 1---'--1 ~ ~ ' , .' _ '. ";1'"1' ~1 ; ;:-[1 : /<'! f t ~, :: '~ ': '" ~2J~ ;,' g: ":'e-J ;:;< 1'= '." '<; ,=ce, , b':;: ; "--=-::i:i;(~<-t-=.- ':: . ':";. "Ie ;'----"'---' :I~I tiW~ '~~~~~"'-,~ ,,",~ ~C I~ ".,~:,~'" t.;:' ~~.~- ,--"_ ;'~ \'"-"'~:: '7 '''''=>", /("",.;-\~:j~I!=;I:::r':.\-= . .., '~'. .!c b: .. "1 ,. . :;;;---'j'a~ ~ '!!' 1 ... . !.. ~ ~.'-' " "'. i - "'~'. __ HI.... ']'~'''' ~ :::; I'~" ~:<""';."" '~~~I~~! :--:" ;.' ';,' -;~1;;'I':' ,;" -i,- -;'" ,~ .:; ~:; ~~ ~ I... :: I ._-~,,, .~-: ~ ~'~. __. <<<n.'.....,.t;"~~... ." .,~ !mc -~.~ .~, -'-"- I~'" n ~ _ .~ , J "" ." ~. ).~, " "m .....-.. 8" ... ~ .., 1 "', ..., _~4 '!J"""", ..;-. "',. "" ",,' I r1 ~. ~ _ ::It ~ ; ~ :~:"1-""~~ #"'~.~ . 0':' ! f . -:.:. ~'~'lf >..-::: """"lall~IJI\.I.J.H"l" m, .,..n_ '" -;':"!r;,,t! I!~ /If, ! .~ · "" .:".. c' -"-- --- ' ~" . -----'~...v tr J ''''<I:'t~- .. ~ ~ =-;;- I - \ \ ..... ",-'" !.!'.' -. ::'l! --.:" l I ~ !=-' ';;.; r:> '.= '::! ~iS'_" .r~u. - ~ "" '~m .~.......... ~ ''i' "" ----.. I 'w __ ". ~ ,_ ""'". _" , ~'-:~.' po, .. ,- I m \ _ _ ,~' ..... "" c." -I_-~_ '" _' '. ,..-': ,~,_ '--- ... "" I ".- , ,. I"" c:~, . ,~ ,g.' ...1.. .. ~~!':,;!'::' ' ;,;,'1::: .;;; !:;, . ~ . - -(:1" "T" I ~"'}"", ~~;~ .....;;: . '" = "" '" :,:,:..... -- .-." -. _..S,'" ~.f"~ ~ ,,,.~ I ~i~;::j; ~'!::""~~:.. ~ -.- --I'" .. 'J" "'-;~.". l--=i '';;'; !:"t-r:L.Ji~.,'-';;':!'" =1!",j'~I>'''1 - '. ,"',. .- 'C 'c". · .' m c -, ... ..." . 1''''1 :\;1;1"1" , :' ;:;'::, ~" '. r - '. - - - -' ,. 'Co C~ ~~ - _, ..,.:~...." "~'.' F t:: 'I' , -'-, '..., :i;:'~i~~~~. !,.. ! p' "!~; r --I.......-~, l_ - 0:.7\, ,_ ...1 !..!~ ~!~~~ ! ~ ~, ~ ., "";;": = 1 "I.,,: I: : - ~,~ '" ,- 11'..-17 .... ,,_ - '0 ~ ~ .,'" .. cTlC" r~ .. - '..:. ~..;,.." u "1;! V r~ ,:.~ o!l'l;. f'" ~W,~-=.r::, !~~r~ r'~'~ -ife'~ ',1' ~ ;~" F,~,_ ;'~. ~h~ ':. ",," ~. "'. ;~ """ .. '" ., -' - - '-, '- "..'. '. - ~i~f ~ ',"".,d ~: \ ~'~";i c.'" .' h ~'. , . ' ,0 1'''' " '~,~;: 1 ,-""",' .," (---i--- , ~ " "., - '." - " , . - 1 -,"",',. ~'T1, ," ~~ ~~~~' ~ ':: .:<t' ,~"",of -., ".Ii -. I~ ."""" " "" ~~'~ '9 '>wZ.. ~ .,.. ,~ 1_ ~ 'I~ .; ~.. ... ",' .... no -. ;;,.. '"' _ 13'" .., .=:_ _ ~ ' _,__"'c -. _ ' _ ,. I .., ,., ~. I' ~ .. _ _ " _" . ~:.:',; ,".', ',~: ,:il i: '" I? '.':. ,M~;; - ~~ , ~:: _-!__"?'; ~ ~ ~ '" '"C"",,,,, --'0, - , '''''' r ..:',.1 .:-;,J , ". ~ __, ,,~."" ~----~, ~~,~ '-. I. '1'.r -, - '''' =, - ~ =. -"'-- ----""'ini .~, - '., ~ ' .' -.J.1 ,. , ,,~z- , ~, ~ ~h ' ~~ I "~ a. D' ::; .....~~~- 1:'_ ! . "!!_ : e 'I! m_ : ~ " " "" I '1;; ';;!! ~ J .:; I ! ~ 1 , ~ ,';; '.., l.:.::c I' . . ~~~" ~I ~ !~. t"l _=--,1 Ci, :.: ~';,,;, .~ '-".... . ';='""'.~ -=~ --I. - - - ,----- .... _ -L ." ,;r" "'" 1+ "",,. ; _ 1_ , ' .. ,I, ';;.--- . - , ,. ..,_ .........'....,,:; ~~ '""', ~ f ;7'~!iJJl' :' ~ ' ,~~....! ,"," .,- co .,;',:;, ~J\:,,'-f- :. :: i9F' ~~"!i .' / "" 1- "" ! , l: t'!; ~~ """"" ~ ! ," . ;.;~I/ ~ll'fu mIL.. ; ::J_ ~ ~ .; ~ "'"'" '. " ~. / -. ..,.' - -- I -- II 1\'-"'~1< Ii I' ~+ ' _ ; '~lEffi'~.!~~~f~I:'~H~~~J' );;, II' ; .~ '" ~~"j; i t; ~ i, I .< ~'""I"---i I ...~ _ I.,.~,. " ,,;; ........ , ---- ~ , _....::;:,'11.. ! ~ ;i"" ""._ =.... ~ n i . ~-ltIE~~- -<: ~ ~ ~ i t: .n. ~~, ~ Jil !.. ---. -",," _0'- 7 F-/:' 1m \\'n ..m \ ~,.o; Uol!>rt -"""--"Ite.. ~ , [3~ is 71. ~ ~.. 5 .....T ....... _ - "" ! ".~ "21"1'1.1_ ~ :m : ~",,-! - ~ 1'l17"'OIIr ~: -:0 .., _,l ... r*Xil J..~ O.....-s. ~ . . - I I ! I ( : l'iir' ~" "" : "" J! ,;. I _ zu; t - V'j; '" I l ! 1 G ...,~ ~~ , \, \ \ "" '" "" '.' ""..... ",..,.,. u u CARMEUCLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No.: Petitioner: Carmel Clay Schools FINDINGS OF FACT. DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and generai welfare of the community because: See Attached. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: See Attached. 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: See Attached. DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Developmental Standards Variance Docket No. is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this day of ,20 CHAIRPERSON, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals SECRETARY, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals Conditions of the Board are listed on the back. (Petitioner or his representative to sign). S :\carme Iclaylanduseregs\checklist\devstandapp Revised 10/17/2000 Po.e 8 of S .. Developmental Standards Variance ".pplloation u u CARMEUCLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: The size of the signage is appropriate for the overall size of the site, and is similar to existing signs on the Carmel High School campus. The directional traffic signage needs to be legible to provide important directional information for the community. This directional signage does not have a negative impact on the community. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: The signage is similar in size to existing signs on the Carmel High School property and will not affect adjacent properties. The directional traffic signage provides only enough sp.ace for the required information and does not have specific design that might be objectionable to the adjacent properties. . 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: The limited size of the traffic directional signage could create traffic problems as people moving in vehicles attempt to read the signage. The legibility and information provided on the directional traffic signage is needed to maintain proper vehicular circulation and avoid potential safety conflicts between vehicles or vehicles and pedestrians. u u CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Carm~l, IndIana Docket No. : Petitioner: Carmel Clay Schools FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheen 1. . 2. 3. DATED THIS DAY OF ,20 Board Member Page 7 of B .~ Deve!opmen12~ Slandards Variance Appllca!ion