The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCorrespondence Tingley, Connie S From: Sent: To: Subject: Connie. u Dobosiewicz, Jon C Sunday, March 09, 2003 3:09 PM Tingley, Connie S Docket number Assignment I left the file on your chair. Laurence issue"d the Docket number for Pedcor Friday. Could you Mark up the folders and return it to me. Thanks, The Docket number is 41-03 DP/ADLS. Carmel City Center, parcel 28 (Pedcor) Jon u ". ~ -' ,..' u .~o] ~.~~ 080 Mr. Bruce Cordingly Pedcor Investments 8888 Keystone Crossing Suite 900 Indianapolis, IN 46240 RE: Carmel City Center Parcel #2 Office Development Dear Mr. Cordingly: We are in receipt of documents prepared by Crews & Sturtz for the first phase of your office development. The drawings submitted are dated 12/19/02 and include the civil, structural, architectural, plumbing, mechanical and electrical engineering for the project. The documents submitted reflect the schematic design approvals granted by the Carmel Redevelopment Commission. This letter is to serve as your approval for your construction documents for the project. We request that a color palette be submitted for the exterior materials only so that we can review and approve for the project. Should you have any questions regarding any of the above, please do not hesitate to contact me personally. Corporate Hea(:~qtj~H"ter~~ Very truly yours, 280 East 961h Street Suite 200 Indianapolis, Indiana Les S. Olds, AlA Principal 46240 Icdj T 317.848.7800 cc: Rick Roesch Luci Snyder Ed Burke Karl Haas Steve Engleking Mike Hollibaugh Kate Weese Steve Sturtz Bob Olson Greg Snelling File F 317.574.0957 www.cso-arch.com '. u u ~ cso EXHIBIT B APPROVED PLAN LIST Carmel City Center Phase I 12/19/02 SHEET INDEX Civil CO 00 C101 C201 C301 C302 C401 C501 C601 C602 C603 Structural S101 S102 8201 S202 8203 S204 S205 8206 S401 S402 8403 Site Cover Sheet Demolition Plan Site Plan Grading Plan Erosion Control Plan Landscape Plan Utility Plan Site Details Site Details Site Details Building One - Foundation Plan Building Two - Foundation Plan Building One - 1st Floor Framing Plan Building Two - 1st Floor Framing Plan Building One - 2nd Floor Framing Plan Building Two - 2nd Floor Framing Plan Building One - Roof Framing Plan Building Two - Roof Framing Plan Notes, Schedules and Details Sections and Details Sections and Details Architectural A 0.1 Life Safety, Code Summary and General Architectural Info Sheet A 1,1 Building 1: Floor Plan - Parking Level A 1,2 Building 2: Floor Plan - Parking Level A 2,1 Building 1: Floor Plan - First Level A 2,2 Building 1: Floor Plan - Second Level A 2,3 Building 2: Floor Plan - First Level A 2.4 Building 2: Floor Plan - Second Level A 3,1 Building 1: Reflected Ceiling Plan - Parking & First Levels A 3,2 Building 1: Reflected Ceiling Plan - Second Level A 3,3 Building 2: Reflected Ceiling Plan - Parking & First Levels A 3.4 Building 2: Reflected Ceiling Plan - Second Level A 4.1 Building 1: Roof Plan A 4,2 Building 2: Roof Plan A 5.1 Building 1: Exterior Elevations. A 5.2 Building 1: Exterior Elevations A 5,3 Building 2: Exterior Elevations u ~ cso u Exhibit B Approved Plan List Page Two A 5.4 Building 2: Exterior Elevations A 6.1 Wall Sections and Details A 6.2 Wall Sections and Details A 7.1 Enlarged Stair and Ramp Plans, Details and Sections A 7.2 Enlarged Stair and Ramp Plans, Details and Sections A 7.3 Stair and Ramp Details and Sections A 7.4 Stair and Ramp Details and Sections A 7.5 Stair and Ramp Details and Sections A 7.6 Stair and Ramp Details and Sections A 8,1 Door and Frame Elevations A 8.2 Room Finish, Door and Frame Schedules A 9.1 Miscellaneous Sections and Details Plumbinq P 1.1 Building 1 - Floor Plan - Basement Level Plumbing and HVAC P 1.2 Building 1 - Floor Plan - Basement Level Plumbing and HVAC P 2.1 Building 1 - Floor Plan - First Level Plumbing P 2.2 BuildIng 1 - Floor Plan - Second Level Plumbing P 2.3 Building 2 - Floor -Plan - First Level Plumbing P 2.4 Building 2 - FIQor Plan - Second Level Plumbing P 5.1 Plumbing Schedules and Details P 5.2 Plumbing Details Mechanical M 2.1 Building 1 - West Floor Plan - First Level- HVAC M 2.2 (Not Used) M 2.3 Building 1 - West Floor Plan - Second Level - HVAC M 2.4 Building 2 - West Floor Plan - First Level - HVAC M 25 (Not Used) M 2.6 Building 2 - West Floor Plan - Second Level - HVAC M 3.1 Building 1 - Floor Plan - Roof Level - HVAC M 3.2 Building 2 - Floor Plan ~. Roof Level - HVAC M 5.1 Mechanical Schedules M 5.2 Mechanical Schedules M 5.3 Mechanical Schedules and Details M 5.4 Mechanical Details Electrical E 1.1 Building 1 - Floor Plan - Basement Level - Lighting and Power E 1.2 Building 2 - Floor Plan - Basement Level - Lighting and Power E 2.1 Building 1 - Floor Plan - First Level - Lighting E 2.2 Building 1 - Floor Plan - First Level - Power ,. ~ u ~ eso u Exhibit B Approved Plan List Page Three E 2.3 Building 1 - Floor Plan - Second Level - Lighting E 24 Building 1 - Floor Plan - Second Level- Power E 2.5 Building 2 - Floor Plan- First Level- Lighting E 2.6 Building 2 - Floor Plan - First Level- Power E 2.7 Building 2 - Floor Plan - Second Level- Lighting E 2.8 Building 2 - Floor Plan - Second Level - Power E 3.1 Building 1 - Floor Plan - Roof Level - Power E 3.2 Building 2 - Floor Plan - Roof Level - Power E 5.1 Electrical Schedules and Details E 5.2 Electrical Schedules 1= ~ITY OF CA~MEL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES ~--._, <~EMORA-NDlIM ====~~....._................................_......,~,.=~==4:;~>-:;'\L'_"i~~;i.~~~=~".,,,.=.,,""=,~==,==",,,.=.~,,~==,~== RECFIVED liAR 6 2003 DOCS TO: LES OLDS KAIU~ I-L"./\S /- SUBJECT: PARCEL #2 PROJECT 3/4/2003 I VL. <; t\..o'] \7P ~ FROM: DATE: cc: STEVE ENGELKING LUCI SN'y1)ER RON CARTER ED BURKE RICK ROESG-I JOHN KOVEN Following are the Department of Community Services comments regarding the draft project agreements for Parcel #2. I hope these comments are helpful for you and the commission as you final ize each of the project agreements. If you have any questions regarding the comments, do not hesitate to contact me. I. The Department recommends that all buildings on the north half of the north parcel front on City Center Drive in order to maintain a continuous building fayade at the street. The frontage place could be shifted south of the building to accomplish this objecti ve and still allow for the same level of access to those buildings. 2. A Change Order, as defined in the project agreements, may only be executed by the CRe or Developer. Section 12 ofthe agreement states that the only changes that can be made to the approved plans are from Change Orders. Because changes may be requested in the zoning approval process for technical and aesthetic reasons, the definition should be expanded to allow for changes as required during the zoning approval process. 3. The definition Final Documents and Drawings refers to drawings finalized and approved by the eRC but does not mention the C-l Development Plan (DP) or Architectural Design, Landscaping, Lighting or Signage (ADLS) approval processes. 4. 111 Section 8, (h) Required Permits, it states that the Developer shall have obtaincd or bc able to obtain all Required Permits by the Due Diligence Date. [fzoning approvals and building permits are included in the definition of Required Permits then it is nearly impossible to accomplish this with a Due Diligence date of September 10. These approvals can only be granted after final construction drawings are pn:pared and reviewed in conformance with the C-l zoning process and provisions in Section 12. 5. Section 12, Developer Construction, of the project agreements does not in any way include the zoning approval process specified in the C-l district zoning ordinance. It 1 of 2 ~ u w leaves out an essential part of the approval process and the ability for the DPI ADLS process to be meaningful and effective. This process should be woven into the process stated in Chapter 12 in order to ensure compatibility with the zoning regulations and clearly layout the development approval process for all involved. 6. Section 12, (g) Permits, states that the Developer will obtain and pay for all Required Permits, IS this the case? Exhibit B (CRC Scope ofImprovements) states that the CRC will assist the developer in obtaining all permits. This should be clarified so responsibilities of each party are clearly understood. Also ill Section 12 (g), it states that the developer will submit all permits to the CRC for review. What is the purpose of this review? 7. In Exhibit B (CRC Scope of Improvements), the ,section titled Description, it is stated that Amli has first rights to excess topsoil stacked on the south edge of Parcel 2. The PEDCOR agreement then states that they have access to left over material. The Kosene agreement states the same thing. Who has precedence after Amli? 8. The Development Gu:idelines for the Property (Exhibit F) need to be updated. A. The existing conditions are out of date for both agreements. B. Section 4.B states that the developer wi]) meet a minimum of 3.5 spaces per 1000 exclusive of on-street parking. From our understanding ofthe proposals, the ratio of 3: 1000 will be met This should be clarified. C. Section 4.B states that the buildings should be close to the street. The site plan for the North parcel does not COnfOffi1 to that principle. D. In 4.D and 6.F, it.states that landscaping will be according to the regulations of CarmeL Typically, the projects fall shortofthe bufteryard standards of the City therefore this should be removed or refer to standards set by the eRe. E. In 4.F, it is stated that the City will provide assistance in obtaining permits; this conflicts with statements elsewhere in the agreement. Please see comment 7 above. F. Tn 5.A, itstates a minimum building height of 2 stories and maximum height of 3 stories. This should state a minimum of 3 stories in order to be in conformance with the definitions set forth in the text of the project agreement. 9. Signage, lighting and landscaping have not been specifically addressed in either the project agreement text or exhibits. Will this be part of the project agreement? 2 ~:a.~ Corporate Headquarters W .~ 280 E. 96th Street, Sulte200 b.: ~--4 Indianapolis, Indiana 46240 C'S 0 T 317;848.7800 F 317.574.0957 www.cso-arch.com u Leder:" af "'fna'n'smiff'al c - ~... -- - ~ ~ - ~ TO: DATE: March 4, 2003 PROJECT NO: 22478 RE: Pedcor WE ARE SENDING YOU: 1 Civil Construction Documents THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: o For approval [8] For your use [8] As requested D For review and comment D Reviewed as submitted D As noted D Revise and Resubmit D Rejected D Resubmit for approval D Submit for distribution o Return corrected prints o Other: REMARKS: Jon: Here is the latest Set of construction documents for the Pedcor project including the latest revision per Kate Weese. If you have any questions please feel free to call me at 706-2497. Thank you, Bob CC: FILE LES OLDS By: Bob Olson o 1-HR Courier D 3-HR Courier 0 Fed-Ex 8:30 A.M. Delivery o Fed-Ex Saturday Delivery D Fed-Ex 3:00 P.M. Delivery o Fed-Ex 10:30 A.M. Delivery [S] Hand Delivey D Fed-Ex Ground IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS INDICATED, PLEASE NOTIFY US AT ONCE. Document3 ~._.~ d;j:2~w~~~ ~ r ~~cP J - ~...... ~ de~~ r-cf r/o ?)~, }f~ i MAR-O'S-03 WED 01: 37 PM CSO CCH ITECHS FAX NO. 70P0.566 U p, 02 w-.; .-"';; ~L Ii~' ...~ ~~~ :)80 January 28, 2003 MI'. Bruce Cordingly Pedcor Investments 8888 Keystone Crosslng Suite 900 Indic'ln21polis, IN 46240 PE: C2Irn1'2t City Center Parcel #2 Office Development Dear Mr. Cordingly: We are ill receipt of documents prepared by Crews 8\ StUI-rZ for the first phase of YOL.!! office development. The drawings slJbm~tted are dated 12/19/02 and include the civil, structural, architectural, plumbing, mechanical and electrical engineering fOI- the project. The documents submitted reflect the schematic design approvals granted by tile Carmel r':;0developrnent Cormnissioll. This letter is to serve as your approval fOi your construction documents for the project. We request that a color palette be submitted for the exterior materials only so that we c~m review and 8pprova for the project. Should you have any questions regarding any of tile abov'2, please do not hesit8tG to contact me personally. . L ~. . ( . l ~', ,I I .: ~ . I ,I, ." I :-~ Very truly yours, t'~~~._:;:....?~~':1J'Jr ""." ';"- ,~~,~,.,.. 'r' .p-.... '''. 1'1- <",l~f~.~J';;:_,.o'("").'I:'\-".~"...~.....~,.,. ...,'1' 2 2.0 [-:.1:-:1 t.r L;lh Sir0'-"'~, ~~~uitl~ ~'no Indil7lIi!'iI."\fili:i, ill~..I;an"'l Les S. Olds, AlA Principal 4tJ~'1O Icclj T :~1~;.f,'^ 8.7BOO cc;:; Rick Roesch Luci Snyder Ed Burke I<arl Haas Steve Eng!eking Milu;: Hollibaugh Kate Weese StEve Sturtz Bob Olsol1 Greg Snelling Fil8 F:3 i7.~)7.1Q057 "''''I'w,u.c,'"rcll Um, ':' '.'\':"I~;;:;~:">:::':>"':'::'>: :':.<:, .:,:-,;.~::-:;f:" : ':::~':< \:,: '; i i ~:'.,:::',L': .;.:>,'.;:,':<;:Y'~:'\';.'1{:: '.\ ,;::~.',\,T,;:-:--' ,;,::,,::..,:::,~ ,<. ",' ..'< ~:,:,;- ::.;:;'. :1:< . ~'. .:..':.. '>, :..::~.~ ".: .,: ,"",;-.._~.-' ; MAR-D5-03 WED 01:37 PM CSOc:)CHITECHS FAX NO, 70566 P. 03 ~~ ~ CSO E){HlBIT 8 APPROVED PLAN UST Carmel City Center Phase I 12/19/02 SHEET INDEX Civil CODO C101 C2D1 C301 C3D2 CL\01 C501 C601 C6D2 eG03 Stcuctl!.uti 8101 5102 5201 5202 8203 5204 5205 8206 ~i4CJ1 S'i02 5403 Site Cover Sheet Demolition Plan Site Plan Grading Plan Erosion Contl'ol Plan Landscape Plan Utifity Plan Site DetE.1ils Site Details Site Det;::;!I;:; BuHd:ng One - Foundation PI2n Building Two ~ Foundation Plan Building Ono ~ 'l:or Floor Framihg Plan Building Two _1st Floor Fr<::ming Plan Buildtng One ~ 2nd Floor Framing Plan Building Two - 2'1d Floor Framing Plan Building One -, Roof Framing Plan 8und~ng Two - Roof Framing Plsn Notes, Sched~Jles and Details Sections and D0tails S9ctioilS and Details f\rcllU5;~tLlral A 0.1 Life Safet~', Cod':: Summary and General Architectural Info Sheet />, 1.1 Ejuikiing 1: Flool' Pfan - Parking Level A 1.2 Buildii19 2: Floor" Plan ~ ParKing Level 0, 2.1 Building 1: Floor Plan - First L.ev:=! A 2.2 Building 1: Floor Plan - Second Leve! A 2.3 Building 2: Floor Plan ~ First Level A 24 Building 2: Floor Plan - Second Level p., 3.1 Building 1: Reflected Ceiting Plan - P2ric:ing & First Lev81s /'\ 3.2 Building 1: Reflected Ceiling Plan - Second Level A 3.3 Building 2: F~efleded Ceiling Plan - Parking & First Levels P, 3.4 Building 2: r~8fI9ct(3d Ceiling Plan - S~cond Level 1-\ ..-1,.1 SuHding 1: Roof Pl21\"1 A 4.2 Bulldlng 2: Roof Plan A 51 Building 1: Exterior Elevations P, 5.2 BUilding 1: E:"jeriorElevations ;:,. 5,3 Building 2: Exte~'ior Elevations i MAR-05-03 WED 01: 37 PM CSO(jCHITECHS FAX NO, 715566 p, 04 ~~ ~ 080 E)~hibit B Approved Plah List P"lg'2 Two 1\ 5.4 Building 2: Exterior Elevations A 6.1 Waif Sections and Det<::lils A 6.2 Wall Sections and Details P.7.1 Enlarged Stair and Ramp Plans, Details and Sectiotls P,7,2 Enlarged Stair Blld Ramp Plans, Details and Sections A 7.3 St8ir 8nd Ramp Details and Sections A 7'A Stair and Ramp Details and Sections f\ 7.5 Stair and Ramp Details 2lnd Sections A 7.6 Stair and Ramp Det~lils and Sections A 8.1 Door and Frame Elevations r\ 8,2 Roon"l Finish, Door and Frame Schedules /\ 9.1 Miscellaneous Sections and DGtails PJ.LJrD !~Jf\g P 1,1 P 1,2. P 2.1 P 2.2 F.l 2.3 P 2.4 P 5,1 ':) r- ~) I ..J,L !yji!.gJ1~1tljf.91 M 2.1 IV1 2.2 [vi 2,3 I\~ 2..4 M 2.5 1'v12G M 3.1 M 3.:~ M 5,1 M 5.2 I\A 5.3 1111 5,4 E !(1dri C(;il Building 1 ~ Floor Plgn ~ Basement Level Ptumbing and HVAC 8uilding 1 - Ffoor Plall ~ Basem2nt Level Plumbing and HVAC Building 1 - Floor Plan - First Levell::Jlurnbing Buildlng 1 - Floor PI"Hl - Second L~Wel Plumblhg Building 2 - Floor Plan ~ First Level Plumbing Building 2 - Floor Plan - Second Level Plumbing Plumbing Schedl,.lles and Detairs F)lumbing DettClils Building 1 -- \I'Jest Floor Plan - First Level - HVAC (Not Used) Building 1 - West Floor Plc:m - Second Lever - HVAC nuilding 2 -. West Floor Plan - First Level ~ HVAC (J\Iol Used) Building 2 - West Floor Plan ~ Second L.evel - HVAC E:uilding 1 -. Floor PI(jn - Roof LeV:31 - HVAC BUilding 2 - Floor Plan - Roof Level - HVAC Mcchclnic2d Schedules Mechanic8.1 Schedules Mecl'ianlcal Schedules and Details Mech8:nicO',1 Details E 1.1 Building 'I - floor Plail - Bas~rnt!lnt Level - Lighting and Power E 1.2 . Building 2 -- Floor Plan - Basement Level - Lighting and Power E 2.1 Building 1 ~ Floor PI8n -~ First Level ~ Ughtihg E 2..2 BUilding '! .- Floor- Plan ~ First Level ~ Power , M'AR-05-03 WED 01: 37 PM CSO~AI)CHITECHS U Exhibit B Approved Plan List Pags Three ~~ \..:,,~--'. CSO FAX NO. 70P0\566 U p, 05 E 2.3 Building 1 ~ Floor PI2n - Second Level - Lighting E 2.4 Bui]drllg 1 - Fioor Plan - Second Level ~ power E 2.5 Building 2 - Floor Plan ~ Fir5t Level - Lighting E 2.6 Bu11dillg 2 -- Floor Plan - FirstLev~; - Power E 2. -, Bui~ding 2 - Floor Plan - Second Leve! ~ Lighting E 2.8 Bullding 2 - Floor Plail- Second Level - Pawer E 3.1 Building 1 ~ Floor Pian - Roof Level- Power E 3,2 Building 2 - Floor Plan .- Roof Level ~ Power [::: 51 Electric81 Schedules ~md Details E 5.2 Electrical SchedulGs ~...., Six Parkwood U ~ 600 E. 96th Street, Suite 550 l ~--4 Indianapolis, Indiana 46240 C S 0 T 317.848.7800 F 317.574.1869 www.cso-arch.com u , -: I.etter.,of'lnan:~'m'ift~f' "; .,...... ~-,;,;:;~.r..... '-" "oJ: '"-' ,<-~-"-,,,,~" "';;:-4::-"'"'" .~~..... TO: Carmel Dept. of Community.S~r-vices- I , One Civic Square /.. ' Carmel, IN 46032 /,~: /' DATE: 01/07/03 PROJECT NO: 22478 - I ~Nt~ ",t\..~~ t~~~ ~~\\ ~~\,~ RE: Carmel City Center Parcel 2B A TTN: Jon Dobosiewicz WE ARE SENDING YOU: \,; ~. jlVL ql_o5 171 .1 1- CONTACT PHONE: 571-241'Q;; ~GqPIES' .D tXi];E" . ....'- , ,QESCe,fp]]ON ,:'C'':;,'" " ~. .. '. ,. ,t~' " "f " :'1' 1 12-19-02 Revised Site Construction Plans THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: D For approval o For your use D As requested o For review and comment o Reviewed as submitted D As noted o Revise and Resubmit D Rejected o Resubmit for approval o Submit for distribution o Return corrected prints o Other: REMARKS: The enclosed information is submitted per comments received at the November 20,2002 Technical Advisory Committee Meeting. cc: FILE By: Greg Snelling D 1-HR Courier 0 3-HR Courier 0 Fed-Ex 8:30 A.M. Delivery o Fed-Ex Saturday Delivery 0 Fed-Ex 3:00 P.M. Delivery D Fed-Ex 10:30 A.M. Delivery o o Fed-Ex Ground IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS INDICATED, PLEASE NOTIFY US AT ONCE. 01-07-03 JDobosiewicz Rev. Canst. Plans.doc ~-., Six PaJkwood U' '~ 600 E, 96th Street, Suite 550 1...:' ~~ Indianapolis, Indiana 46240 C S 0 T 317.848.7800 F 317.574.1869 www.cso-arch.com u '"~ "''[~tteT~rmt~nsmirtal' ::' . -y-- "- R -.: . -~ ~ _~ - _~ ~ ~ 1 <( TO: Dept. of Community Services One Civic Square . Carmel, IN 46032 DATE: 11/4/02 PROJECT NO: 22478 A TTN: Scott Brewer ~ t1\) ~t~J \\J 1~~~ ~~\\ 1 \lJC~ RE: Carmel City Center Parcel 28 CONTACT PHONE: 571-2417' WE ARE SENDING YOU: :OOPIES DATE " iDESGRIPT.ION ; 1 Revised Construction Plans THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: o For approval [gI For your use o As requested o For review and comment D Reviewed as submitted o As noted D Revise and Resubmit o Rejected o Resubmit for approval o Submit for distribution o Return corrected prints o Other: REMARKS: The enclosed information is submitted per comments received at the November 20, 2002 Technical Advisory Committee Meeting. Note the existing landscaping now identified north of the reflecting pond. Please call me or Kirt Moody at 848-7800 if you have any additional comments or questions. Thank you. CC: FILE JON DOBOSIEWICZ By: Greg Snelling o 1-HR Courier ~ 3-HR Courier D Fed-Ex 8:30 A.M. Delivery D Fed-Ex Saturday Delivery 0 Fed-Ex 3:00 P,M, Delivery D Fed-Ex 10:30 A.M. Delivery o D Fed-Ex Ground IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS INDICATED, PLEASE NOTIFY US AT ONCE. 01-07 -03 SBrewer Rev, Const. Plans.doc ~ ..e", eso u u December 4, 2002 Mr. Bruce A. Cordingly Pedcor Investments 8888 Keystone Crossing Suite 900 Indianapolis, IN 46240 RE: Carmel City Center Parcel NO.2 Design Approval Dear Mr. Cordingly: This letter is to inform you that the Carmel Redevelopment Commission has approved your Exhibit H dated September 16, 2002 covering the preliminary design for site plan and building elevations. This approval is subject to the submittal of the final construction documents and plans which will be reviewed by the Commission for final approval for the project. If you have any questions regarding any of the above, please do not hesitate to contact me personally. Corporate Headquarters ~ S. Olds, AlA Principal 280 East 96th Street Suite 200 Indianapolis, Indiana Icdj 46240 cc: Steve Sturtz Rick Roesch Luci Snyder Ed Burke Steve Engleking Kate Weese Kelli Lawrence Bob Olson File T 317.848.7800 F 317.574.0957 www.cso-arch.com .. i u u Fahey, Joyce 0 From: Sent: To: Andy Kern [Andy.Kern@ctrwd.org] Tuesday, November 19, 2002 11 :33 AM rfarrand@ccs.k12.in.us; AKeeling@cLcarmel.in.us; CTingley@ci.carmel.in.us; DHill@ci.carmel.in.us; DPattyn@cLcarmel.in.us; Ghoyt@ci.carmel.in.us; GStahl@cLcarmel.in.us; JDobosiewicz@ci.carmel.in.us; JFahey@ci.carmel.in.us; JKendall@cLcarmel.in.us; JPFoster@ci.carmel.in.us; KHahn@ci.carmel.in.us; LLillig@ci.carmel.in .us; MFogarty@ci.carmel.in.us; MHol1 ibaugh@cLcarmel.in.us; MMcBride@ci.carmel.in.us; MSnyder@ci.carmel.in.us; PMorrissey@ci.carmel.in.us; PPace@ci.carmel.in.us; RHancock@cLcarmel.in.us; SBrewer@ci.carmel.in.us; slillard@ci.carmel.in.us; W Akers@cLcarmel.in.us; Dean. Groves@Cinergy.COM; sprater@cmsenergy.com; sjb@co.hamilton.in.us; stc@co.hamilton.in.us; Jay Alley; john- south@iaswcd.org; jeffry. farmer@timewarnercable.com; tskolak@usps.gov; CSh upperd@vectren.com Re: Change in Agenda for November 20th SUbject: Hello everyone: Following are CTRWD comments on the agenda items effecting our sanitary sewers or service area for the November 20, 2.002 TAC meeting. Please feel free to copy and distribute this email or attach it to your meeting minutes. We have also created a new page on our website linked to the "Construction" page where we have posted all CTRWD TAC comments from 2001 and 2002 meetings held to date. We will continue to add to this page every month so please let everyone know they can view our comments online now too. Proposed Wireless communication Towers-Crooked Stick Golf Course Special Exception Application The District has not received any plans for this proposal. Building permits should NOT be issued unless the District has issued connection permits. Hamilton Crossing Building #6 (Development plan) The plans that the District received are in accordance with the District specifications. Building permits should NOT be issued unless the District has issued connection permits. Pennsylvania and 122nd Street-Northeast Corner (Rezone) The District has no comments on the rezone unless it affects the sanitary sewers in this development. Lakeside Park, Section Two (Secondary Plat and Construction Plan~) The plans received by the District do not contain the most recent version of the District's Sanitary Sewer Specifications. Revised plans need to be submitted. A preconstruction meeting will need to be held before the construction of the proposed sanitary sewers. Building permits should NOT be issued unless the District has issued connection permits. .Please remind all TAC applicants to provide plans directly to the District at our main office address in care of Andy Kern at: 10701 N. College Ave., Suite A, Indianapolis, IN 46280-1098. If there are questions about the District I s requirements, then plea.se refer to our website for current information on the District's construction specification and permit standards. We are a member of the IUPPS underground locate network so call 1-800-382-5544 before you dig! Please feel free to contact Jay or me if you have questions or need additional information. Thanks! 1 , ~ Andy Kern, Project speCiali~ Clay Township Regional Waste District Hamilton County, IN, USA http://wwW.ctrwd.org/ 317-844-9200 (phone) 3 17 - 8 4 4 - 92 03 ( fax ) u ~<< >>> "Dobosiewicz, Jon C" <:JDobosiewicz@ci.carmel.in.us> 11/12/02 12:07PM >>> To all, The item scheduled for llam is called off. The llam spot will be filled with the following item which was inadvertently left off the agenda. 11:00 a.m. Carmel City Center Parcel 2B (Development Plan) The applicant is proposing office and retail The site is located at the southwest corner of 3rd Avenue Drive. Filed by Greg Snelling of CSO. SW and buildings. City Center Thanks, Jon See revised agenda attached. <:<:TAC2002-1120.rtf>> 2 u u Mr. Greg Snelling Six Parkwood 600 E. 96th Street, Suite 550 Indianapolis, IN 46240 ~ . RrCF/I/FD J,il~!' , 'I! 1:'.- ,. ',; .'1/11) DOCS . " November 12, 2002 RE: Project NO: 22478 Carmel City Center Parcel 28 Dear Mr. Snelling: I have received and reviewed the plans submitted for the above-mentioned project.. I see nothing in the plans that would hamper law enforcement efforts. If we can be of any further assistance to you, please contact us. Respectfully, ~:])./T4 Michael D. Fogarty Chief of Police MDF:vb cc: Dept. of Community Services A Nationally Accredit '''g_ ....... orcement Agency ,~ffii.~t", . (317) 571-2&00 F 4X (317) 571-2512 \ ( EROS N AND SEDIMENT CONTRO PLAN TECHNICAL REVIEW AND COMMENT Hamilton County Soil and Water Conservation District 11 08 South 9th Street, NobIesvillc IN 46060 Ph- 317-773-1432 or Email at john-south@iaswcd.org PROJECT NAME: Carmel City Center ParceL2B SUB"MITTED BY: Pedeol' Investments LLC 8888 Keystone Crossing, Suite 900 Indianapol i.s, IN 46240 Ph: 317-587-0320 Mr. Greg Snelling CSO 280 East 96th Street, Suite 200 Indianapolis, IN 46240 REVIEWED BY: John B. South P.E. Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURE: Plan Review Date: 11/11/02 Acreage: 4 LOCA nON: S.W. corner of 1261h and 3RD Avenue SW LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sec. 36 TOWNSHIP: 18N RANGE: 3E CIVIL TOWNSHIP: Clay SOIL SURVEY MAP SHEET: On Plans The technical review and comments are intended to evaluate the completeness of the erosion and sediment cuntrol plan for the project. The erosion and sediment control plan submilled was no/reviewedfor the adequacy of the engineering design ALl practices included in the plan, as well as those recommended in the comments should be evaluated as /0 their.f~!Qsibility by a qualified individual with structuralpractices designed by a quaLified engineer. Theplan has not been reviewed/or Local, state, orfederal permits that may be required to proceed with this project. Additional information, including design calculations may be requested /0 further evaluate the erosion and sediment control plan. The erosion and sediment control plan has been reviewed and it has been determined that the plan: X Satisfies the minimum requirements and intent of 327JAC 15-5 (Rule 5). Notification will be forwarded to the Indiana Department of Environmental Management. (This site is less than 5 acres but is part o1'a larger common project and must submit an NOI to IDEM.) Proper impLementation of the erosion and sediment controL plan and inspections GIthe constructiun site by the developer or a representative are necessGlY to minimize o!J:site sedimentation. The developer shouldbe aware that unforeseen construction activities and weather conditions might affect the pelformance of a practice or the erosion and sediment control plan. The plan must be aflexible document, with provisions 10 modifY or substitute practices as necessary. Revised 4/97 Cc: Carmel DOCS Ha. Co. Surveyor IDEM File NOV 07 '02 01:56PM \ (1 P.l/1 f')' ~.y I >,~.._-) . ').- 'j,.l": ...~ -. '" -"" ---..,').. ---'"'''". ,2, ....-;" cJ" '-.n...._ ,,- C Xcnlcm C. 'l.\:lardJ SW'I1I.'}/or '1'Iioll\'..".-r;')}7",Ij:-S'Ill,1 ~- ? \'""~II"".;p' NQ,"mb" 7, 2002 ,V''" 'r'-"~,: l. RECENEO eso <.=: !.IO\I 1 2002 ~ Attn: Greg Snelling;=1 l~ ,1 ~ Six Parkwood ~ . DOCS 600 E. 96u1 Street, Su:~~~SO /~ fndianapolis, LN 46240~O.t:!IL___-,..,{$/ VIA FACSIMll.$: ~ 17.574~ Re: Carmel City Conter Parcel 28 StilI!! lS8 Olle :l{t/mllloll Cmorty Sqmm .Nobbllilll!, '//llllll1ll 4 t>ob/I.;l.1j<' yUJ d~f #- Dear Mr. Snelling: We have reviewed the constructiQn plans submitted to the Hamilton County Surveyor's office on November 4,2002. We have the following comments: I. This :sjt~ doet. nQt appear to directly affect any Ha.milton County Regulated Dl'Blrts therefore, no requests will need to be filed wIth this office 2. This project will fall under the regulations of the city ofCa.rmel Engineer's Office for drainage requirements. Should YOI.l have any ques.tiQns please contact me at 776-8495. Thank YQ\!. ,...sincerely, bt~i~ Plan ReYiewer Cr;;: Cann~J-Enginecr Ca.rmel-Community Development Hamilton County Department of Soil Conservation Services Ha.mllton County Highway D\'lparttncnt