Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence ~v~ eft:> ~ Civil Designs November 25, 2008 Mr. Gary Duncan City of Carmel Engineering Department One Civic Square, 1st Floor Carmel, Indiana 46032 Re: Stout Shoes Request for Administrative Variance Dear Mr. Duncan: Per this letter, we are requesting an administrative variance from the City of Carmel Stormwater Technical Standards Manual. . Our request pertains to Chapter 300.07.1 which requires that facilities with permanent pools or' containing permanent lakes shall have a water area of at least one-half (0.5) acre and a minimum depth of 8 feet, and Chapter 300.06.12 which requires that detention basins shall be sized to detain the runoff from the fully developed right- of-way per the City of Carmel 20-year Thoroughfare Plan. We are proposing a wet pond BMP in the southeast corner of the property which will have a normal pool surface area of approximately 6,500 square feet (0.15 acres) and a depth of at least 8 feet. The small size of the property (2.38 acres) as well as the configuration of the lot does not allow for a larger pond to be constructed on this site. Also by having the pond wet and adding wetland plantings to the safety shelf the pond serves as the second BMP for the proposed site. In addition we are also proposing that the volume of water trom the fully developed right-at-way be detained within the two feet of freeboard in the pond. We appreciate your consideration ot our requests; please let us know if there is any additional information you may need. Very truly yours, Civil Designs, LLP rC#c t/ 1---- Todd C. Wallace, E.!. 2415 Directors Row, Suite E Indianapolis, IN 46241 www.civil-designs.com P 317.244.1968 f 317.244.1969 Page 1 of2 Conn, Angelina V . ~;~~~~-~ncan, G~'- 'C..V\ 3 \ V1.~,"V\5"'"''''''~'''---'--''-'''''--'''-''' Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 12:41 PM To: 'Richard Hoover' Cc: Michael C. Cook; hbstout318@yahoo.com; Conn, Angelina V Subject: RE: Stout Shoes Thanks Dik; sorry to make you sweat this out until the last minute. I wish that I could control my own schedule so that I could have wrapped this up sooner... I will take a look for the plans and drainage report. From: Richard Hoover [mailto: rhoover@Civil-Designs.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 12:41 PM To: Duncan, Gary R Cc: Michael C. Cook; hbstout318@yahoo.com; Conn, Angelina V Subject: RE: Stout Shoes Thanks Gary. We should be ok for the Plan Commission meeting this evening. We've modified most of the plan sheets and will work on the remaining items. For the downstream analysis, does the City have any drainage reports (maps and calculations) as well as plans for the improvements last made to Old Meridian? Those would be very helpful in extending our downstream analysis. Thanks, Dik Dik Hoover Civil Designs, LLP 2:415 Di.rectOl"s Row, Suite E Indianapolis, bldi3n3 46241 Tel 317-244-1968 Fax 317-244-1969 Cell 317-441-8682 From: Duncan, Gary R [mailto:gduncan@ccirmel.in.gov] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 12:35 PM To: Duncan, Gary R; Conn, Angellna V _ Cc: Barnes, David R; Foley, Amanda J; Hill, Dick B; McBride, Mike T; Redden, Nick; Richard Hoover Subject: RE: Stout Shoes Based on cbnversatrbns with DOCS this morning, the Department rescinds the following comments from the previous email below: 1. Southernmost Curb Cut Item 2. 2. Northernmost Curb Cut Item 3. . 3. Future Loop Road Item 1. As it relates to Detention Facility Issues Item 1, the petitioner will need to formalize a commitment to conform to the requirements of Section 302.06 (4) of the Storm Water Technical Standards Manual based on the final alignment of the future loop road, Thank you foryour time this morning Angie. Gary 8/2012008 I " Page 1 of 2 Conn, Angelina V From: Conn, Angelina V Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 12:39 PM To: 'Michael C. Cook' Cc: 'Richard Hoover' Subject: FW: Stout Shoes Hi, MiChael - please call me after you read these emails below, if you stili have questions about tonight's meeting. 571- 2281. Angie Conn, Planning Administrator Dept. of Community Serv.ices - Planning & Zoning 1 Civic Square, 3rd Floor City of Ca rmel, IN 46032 p,317-571-2417 f.317-571-2426 aconn@carl1leLin.gol/ from: Duncan, Gary R Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 12:35 PM TQ: Duncan, Gary R; Conn, Angelina V Ct: Barnes, David R; Foley, Amanda J; Hill, Dick B; McBride, Mike T; Redden, Nick; 'Richard Hoover' Subject: RE: Stout Shoes Based on conversations \vith DOCS this morni ng, the Depa11ment rescinds the following comments from the previous email below: 1. Southet1llllost Curb CUl Item 2. 2. Northem111ost Curb ClIlltem 3. 3. Future Loop Road Item l. As it relates to Detention Facility Issues Item 1, the petitioner will need to formalize a commitmentlO conform to the requirements of Section 302.06 (4) of the Stann Water Technical Standards Manual based on the final align ment of the future loop road. Thank you for your time this morning Angie. . Gary From: Duncan, Gary R Sent: Tuesday, August 19, Z008 9:55 AM To: Cohn, Angelina V Cc: Barnes, David R; Foley, Amanda J; Hill, Dick B; McBride, Mike T; Redden, Nick; 'Richard Hoover' Subject: Stout Shoes Stout Shoes Southernmost Curb Cut 1. The petitioner has agreed to relocate the proposed southern entrance north approximately 60' to a location -t!:::- where the drive's northern edge will match up with the proposed 8' sidewalk and reconfigure the on-street parking accordingly. 2-:- Ti'le 13otitioAsr FlstJas ts verify if 6 VElri8AeO ie r8E1~if()a far tAB laoEltiElA of this I3~F13 611t siRes it is F1Elt iRdioot138 ElR Hw Old ~~.oridiEln TQel, Foree nepGrt. . Storm Water Outfall 1. The Department thanks the petitioner for analyzing the capacity of the existing piping under 13151 Street. Additional analysis is required to ensure that the piping on the Rase Walk property also has adequate capacity. This item may be addressed during final review and approval of the construction plans. Street Lighting 1. I believe that this has been addressed 8/19/2008 Page 2of2 Detention of Right-of-Way 1.A variance from the Board of Public Works and Safety is required to utilize the freeboard for detention of the right-of-way. This item may be addressed during final review and approval of the construction plans. Northernmost Curb Cut ~ 1. The petitioner has agreed to commit to connecUo the future loop road at such time as this loop road is constructed (and access to such road is provided by easement or other right) and to close (or modify if a common access is provided at the property line) the proposed north drive at that time. 2. The Department will support approval of the curb cut to the Board of Public Works and Safety at the current proposed location conditioned on the above. &- Tfie potitioAor nooes to ','crif)' if 0 vaFiaAElc is roquirod fer tRc Isootiol'l af tAis el;JFb ellt siAec it is flat ifl6iElatod 01'1 tho aIEl MoriEJillA Ts.51( rsreo nCI38A:. Future Loop Road +-= Tfie DOPOA:A'lOAt ASS rovic\';ed t)Gtl9 tAo Milted Modiesl ZORC COA'lproI90I'lGi\'8 Plan and tAo. OIEl McridiaF'l TElGI( FOFElo nopo!'L TAo Dopal'l:A'loFlt ~AclOrotOAd8 tAat thc Mixes MoElieel ZORO COA'lJ3rcRcRsi'/e flaA 68!Sl8ROt GlPl3ly to this projoet. Tho aiel Meridian T 1181( Fomc nepol'l: iAdiaateo tho futl1rfJ loof"] Faad to BC,8m:rtorod OR tho CQ3t PIl)f3CFty IJAO of tAO eto~t eRoc3 pareel aAEI 'A'e~ld affoet tRo paRd. .~s previalJsly insieatod, tRo 10eotloAof tl;is flltl:J ro rOflEi'Nay AocEIs to be eatalalisl::led by tho PIGI"lAin@ De!)al'l:A'loAt 6I:Je to tAo fElet tRat tf:;Je Ibeati6F1 i5 indisatod on a zeAiR~ 80el:lA'leAt. . Detention Facility 'Issues 1. As it relates to the pond setback, if the 1 aO-year elevation or the top of bank of the proposed pond is less than . 50-feet from the future right-af-way (based on the final alignment of the roadway) the City will require the property owner to iristall a barrier or guardrai~jacent to the existing pon,d. This should be formalized in a commitment < also. Thoroughfare Plan 1. The Department has discussed with the petitioner that compliance with the Thoroughfare Plan requires ~ construCtion of half of the improvements stipulated by the Plan across each frontage. This item needs to be " formalized in any commitment concerning the use of the Real Estate. "- - 8/1912008 Page 1 of 1 Conn, Angelina V From: Boone, Rachel M. Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 2:03 PM To: Conn, Angelina V Subject: Stout's Shoes Building S \ ()f' CL~ Angie, The Stout's Shoes Building signage is rather interesting. On one of the color renderings, it shows a sign up on the second floor. This sign is not shown in the proposed drawings where they state the colors and sizes, etc. I don't necessarily think there's enough room up there for a wall sign. I would almost rather propose a projecting sign like Noodles and Co. has for the upper story tenant. As for the sign band area on the Stout's building (dark brick, two story bldg.), I think this is ok, but not great. For example, they have Stout's shoes as the end tenant and put their sign in the middle of the sign band area because they took up two tenant spaces. (And it's a short logo/name, so it doesn't take up enough room) But on the others, they show how it could have two signs, one above each tenant space. I think where there will be two signs in one sign band area, there should be more distinction separating the signs. Perhaps more molding or a cut out panel with decorative edges and a different color. (Look at the rendering I printed out.) Also, the sign band areas are 96 sq. ft., 126 sq. ft. and 96 sq. ft. However, the ~tenants would be limited to 35 sq. ft. of signage if their tenant space is under 50'. If it is over, they will be allowed 60. Thank goodness there is the 80% length limit and a 3' height limit. It's a big jump between tenant spaces. Speaking of the 80% length limit...the sign specifications detailed on the drawings are ok - except for the color part. It says they will respect the colors of each tenant and not limit them. It does limit the lighting style to either back lit or gooseneck lit - which is good. But not limiting the colors might not go over so well. Perhaps we should have them pick a palate of colors. What do you think? I like the proposed signage for the second building (light colored brick) much better. The sign band areas are each only 48 sq. ft. and would most likely be limited to 35 sq. ft. for a single tenant sign. One issue I see is if there is a large tenant that takes up two spaces and wants to put one big sign up on the pseudo second story where it is specified to show two separate signs (or on the south end where the same could happen). We might want to advise them to show another version which would allow for one sign up there. The signs they have proposed facing north and south on the end caps - these would require variances, would they not? I don't think these are necessary...especially if we can talk them into projecting signs for the second story. Awning signs in the back to identify store names would be ok (but would really require a variance) - so long as it does not exceed the total allowable square footage for the tenant space. Perhaps they could have small blade signs under the awnings facing Old Meridian St. for pedestrian traffic. This would also be instead of signs on their awnings in the front. Let me know if you have any other questions or what your thoughts are on all of this. I will bring the drawings in for you to look at. Rachel ~ .~ '-/'& '\D r ~\;S ~~~ Rachel Boone Sign Permit Specialist Department of Community Services City of Carmel One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 317.571.2417 317.571.2426 fax httQ1LVV'lM.ci,-carmel. in. us/services/commun ityservice. html ~j 8/18/2008 .r~ .. ~ i~ j ~Ji.~1 ~ r i~~ * I <1l~~:::~~ I D-as~c-\""~ _ CA_ :;; t:) r ~ ::!: ~ ~z .J rrl - ~ :::l ....... Q)~ .J~ ~o ... w~ Cl:L!.J .- ........ z t"'" 0( rrl z ""- wn ... ~ ... ~ . ~~ :c 0 ~ r w~ z (/) I-~-- ~----. ~ Iff/',! I!II.~ ,- ff ~I~}~l; ~ .~: ' I ;, 0 ~t ~l~K~~ ~ I : u', I~~~i~g'(~ ~ ,~ i I I 1~11.. C\I i~fH~H~ l:i !:; ~.L~,~",~ I ,I~.~ --< '!~~i~;<~fl ~ 1 i ~~~~~~ l~'''f R'I\,j~' ......... l~ h~~H ~ g;;W'\jJ J~ te 0: ,,:!<8~<'::<8 Iii! 6iii '~ ~ ',; - .-1___1 . . .-.___ . L_ ._.. l _ . . _ _J l .. .. _____J I-:=-,-..~;-------, ....:.:!. , ..<;>~(\~:' I ".,...~~.. ~-~ ('I ,~ ~... ". ~ ". - ,) .'1I....i'I'......... '1~ WV'',) /dii~ ~. .~-<!:~ ~ ,,; , '.,.!n......, in; Oil\' l~!\i ;;~:nf;i~j;;ir DNJOllnS 830HS ln01S ."."....,,111".' Q) :; t :: c- \, & ~ r~ ~ ~' j ! L 1.N3V'ldOl3^3G 301:::1:::10 illV' 138 M3N J "'--- --....-.-. '-"- __L__ -.--.--_-___J ____. _..__.__ __. '_ .______..____..__ ':)NI 'lN3V'l30'tfN'VV'l GN'V ONINN'Vld NOllJn81SNOJ ! ----.-.-_--..-"...-~ V\ s:.~ Qi\ ~ i t-~ CI)~ ~i ,'.- ..... ( T""" \ ,,---) s ~ ~~ (~:) I, 1.3 I. ~ O~/MM ZONING 'I .,'" ;/ .; /: Ii' ,,/ f "' 17 10 ~ I. ~o I" "' l~l:Jol D~!icrif)tiL"Jl'! h. I" h, BITE DATA: o_~ Pad of thl1 Ncrlh""RSl '~l,JlJrter ot 5ectior'l ;:t5. Tow'lTl;p 18 /lertrl, ROI'lc;e 3 EO$\ or the 5ecO'lc Princ:ip::I1 M(!rioiian, Clay Town3hip. City of Co~n<e'. Hamilton COUI'lI,.. l'ldiara. jcsc"ibec:l os ~OlloVl"l.~ :!:nr ..,R[...._. L3:;t\ ....eo"'" (lIB,M"l fj~ ~-J) Comrr,encin~ oJ~ tl'1e lIOUlh..,et;1 ctJ'ne' or s::lic t'JUnrtN: the-l"Ice f'JOIth 90 d~o;!''='t't; 00 m.""tl'': 0[1 fOeccnds East iJlor,g th~ st)uth li"e- l,",ere-of 44.~ 10 l-eel 10 ttle s~UthW€5t cor~cr 01 \"'~ 101'1"" tie..c:ribt'd ;1"\ l':l Wnrronty D~ed 10 DO\.Iglo!o U & DCJuglas r.: ScaH, r~cor(jed 0$ I"shl.lmcorot 19~9-01J6&C in tiw Ofliclot ()I the Rec[jrt".er ~I Honilotl Cc>unl~, In diol1ll; ~htmt:e ~Jorlh l'.n d~g[~e O~ minl.ltes D5 !:e!':onCl~ EC"ir nIO,"'q th~ we,t lire ~hereof 18.13 fe€l lo th~ PQltH OF [l[G1Nr~I~.;G on :he r"lorlh riSlht 0-1 '-I'Io.~' li'le Of .....esl Moil' Slr~et CJ5 "hO...r. Of\ C R(.IU:e Sun..ey Plot pre~ofed b)' Butl~r, foirmo'1. t!l Seufe"t. re:cfCed as InstrurTCr\l 2C06-364jj; IhMC~ rJodh 89 degre't'~ J5t fT1inlll~ 13 ~er.:cn(j.s W~st alor'l'9 soia rig/"'_t (Ii wo'l lint:l 66.89 feet: ~h~l'lce f~ortl'l 34 de9~e="j 31 mbutes l.3 s~c()nd:> tost 24,JO It;~t; thence: tJodh 01 cte()~ee 0:; minutes 05 seconds Ecs' 117,tj2 le-e!; th~nt::e North B~ dClJ"'"ces J5 minule-!; 13 se-conc:s We~t 177.87 lep.t; thence ~Jnrt,., 53 fi!'!:qrees 21 mir'tutes 19 sec(lfid! ""..st 4..3.9~ :et:l lo the eC'l:3t -i.g'1t /:if 'lII'::'y lire or Ole J.l~rid;on Strc=-t r;le'r some s"r~}o~ lhel"("e ~Jodh JB dcgree! 42 mil1.de~ 51 seo;.ond:!I EO!it ::Jlor>~ ~Qi\J right 01 waf' 4-01.0D feet 10 the f\or-thO:Qsterll line of the IUl1e d~s!:ri::'H,,(: in a WorrOl1t) D~d b Herr)' A Stout. el 'JI. -ecorded ~n Deed Bcolo 350 PO,,:!e'~ 42J.-4Z4 (the ne:.:~ two CQII'I are olonq 50id (Jette llnt::::l); th~n=e South 5J deC)ree~ ::;\ minutes 19 seCOI'1(lS Easl 2~6.i5 fp.~t: ther1ce Scut, 01 d~gfee 05 "';nutes 05 seco"tds Wes.t 1.3-1.11 feet to the nnrtneosl corn~l (If Ine land (I!scribed in 0 Wcrronty DS':Id to :>Quc;IQS 0 ~'l DDuglo'5 C Scott. reD:lfClld C~ Instr:.Jmen! 1999-O,G,fi,6D (t~~ !er-a':!I"un9 ~""O ;011:0 orlf Qiong :;:nid df'-I!!d li",-I!!~I: tr.el'iciIi! ~~Or"th 90 d~Q-ees 00 min...tc3 00 'eo;vnd~ West 200CQ (ec~ t" he l'1o~th""esl corner lher:o~ thet1c~ ~u...th '), deqree 05 minute~ 05 ser.::o.,c! w~'St l~1.O-l h:I~1 tl:J tI1e paltH or B(GINNlrJG. cCf1toinin9 2_.378 e~re!l" m~~ or 'ess, '~ I /,:~;.? ,/ I..~/ / ,", i /..... ,;;' /;~? /'/''/ .Ii -- -- ---- ---- ~,../;~.~/ 1/ /~~/ ,'.. //,/1 /." //1:1 /;" / /,1 III/ ./ /:1 1 / .. // , , I // 1// / 1/ 1 I / i'/ I',' If/ .' 1// " -' ,'//' I' / .' /." ;- /~//- I'~I /,~:/ /, /' /.~/ ,_",/...._. 'T',J/ (/ - ,// , . ' 1 ^ ,.... II ~ ": /..' I~~' //,' II /'1 /.1/ ~'/'.~:/ -----________~I',.~ / ,fill 1/ /'.~~/ 1 " / .vI I' ,. j/' ;' 4'/ 1 " / t"/ 1 ;' / /II 1/ / .{, ,/; I ~/ 1// II / / I I;' I .' /14:/ .' " / i;" I / I~:-' 1 / If/ I' / 1,/ I~ t , I i. '/ 1-:/.' / ,V ,; ---./~!/ .7 -- i/ (:...; /' y" J/ I ....) II I, ~~'I.. Ii / \ .1,. ,., .(/ . >.~f 1; /)/' /1/ ,.. 1/ f i, ,IJ~~" .' .I.{/ ,0 ,<~~::/ o~ ~ ':~_~ ;;~;/:::: ' __ .J"/,~/ :~ ~~>./ . .~ - I , I I , I , I , ., I , I , I 1 --1,__ '''\\ VICINITY MAP' Jt:'\ r'Ol ro SCil.LE x:i: OM jMU ZOJ./I~JG O'~/!.IM LOI~IIC 'I UTILITY STATEMENT: i &e 1Il"\d"Qf1l.mo uliliti6 $"10"''' ~C1~ b~en lo~aled lr~ r~C1 :iiAr.ey II .,"fo--ml:lIICll'" ond e,.'St",Cj d'(l-..,n;,.. Th.. 5U.......~ "'00:11$ "1;0 'iill,'or(lnt~$ I &.01 the IIr1Qerc,rOl.lI1(] \ltllhle~ ::::ompr~ all iIIl..Jd'1 lltiln.eS ... It1,=, OI~. ...111..- n-'i8v"=l! or ot;Jondgne1f. The S\J''''~JoOr fU"lI'H!( don not wl]~r~'11 1M: tl'll!" I.Jn;:l"c;round I"Itl;l~ m~.w'1 o'e irl Ul. ,,~c:t IO;::(H!oro I ;,.oicoiec (l1t~oIl9'1 thl!" "'J~W'~ C1o~, c...-j,/y thot lh... UIe locol..; ..~ OCCl,lfot.ly C$ PQ_O'lI 'rom lnla~otJD!'I ~'o'Clable_ The ~l.Jr"""'I'Or l'II~ L~! ph)1'r.nII~ Inc:.,ted lJl1I!' \.Ifld~qr'C\.ll1o;l \lUilie~. r.p;;~~~ 1~ ~j U ;~ H H r ~i r~ ;1 t~ ") ~~0..j , I I I I I OM/MM: zorJltlG I I n I L I I ?,'?'/0::::n t; ;j ~; ~J ~ f~ r;j r -fl :] I f; ~. _I (-; ij r Lt;{~~-J I I I I OM/SIJ ZONING -" ~ < I I I I I L_ r-~ I I I I I I I I ! DM/IAU ZDIIIt~G . I ._;---~;J - - ____ _......_ <.~. ------.. ------... ---- " ./ -. ) I ~-I r I I I OM 'r,,11J Z 01' line r-~= =.: =:.:. = = == =----/ I .' -'- .... - - - - .... -,,""" ....= __.~~'"'".v..-.;.. . J .....~."- :~ I' I' I' 1'0 1" I' I' " r' 113 I' !!8.P1t..o CATA: l,UllDII'G ARE... __ .....HJ,~-.(J Sf (FOOTPRI~ITJ REOUI'tED PARlOOG[}A.JA: :,iTAf,jDARO ::l":'~.'I'H:: .:?Q S"'ACES .,...,IO'C....'" 1'~~.~IW; .= ? ."ir~CFS ';':J1Al r.ECVlRW p:.R~-:lrlG _ JO :jP..C::; PRO~DP~DA.JA: 5.7.t',1l OAP.t: f' ,a,~UWJ ~1~'JO"_i<'r. l"~P'.~It<C: H,4J~~Ct.P ~...Fa<IIIG ;;; !'Ie ',3p:,crs (:1' 'J: ;'I'(J') . ;20 ~PAC'[.S (10 ~ Ie.) ti SPACES T~TAL RR()i)O~[c PARI\WG - ~06 9'ACE:>: ZOtoiIoi(j;:,\Tk R~OR'SEO USE. ",. ..CO~~EFCl.loJ.. :P.CTAIL};OrnC:E Z(J'.;JI-K, tllSH"IC.T. ._O~O Mt:~ICI:""~ (Oto':"f.IU' P<3TF:'ICT ~!HTZOOIIlr'IG~TDN&: ~1{'.P.lli CY/IJf.4 D1SIRICT SOUn. ......C"'/I.'!U DISTRICT ~~-5T. .____.'J...../lJU ~ 0.... ,\,11.1 OI~~ICT wrSL.. .. aM/~. OO!"';J. ,~ ~/YM !}I~r;.ICT W1L.rw+G BETBACKl!! ;;~:)'-H. ......10. '.tIU, SE:TBAQ< 20' l.I.A.Y, SETB"-o. ~U..P.... 5' ::;[mAo- :;'OE . ._....... ::;[Tlj.!,CV ~ I EXIEi!~~_[i LEGENO: O('SCRIPfifJtl' .. [:"ISTING ~S?fi"'L T -:~~'''.'':~E>:lsm~ ,..-'",: :"~ E....1511I...C C0"4cp'(T( ~_.I1ElAPUP.AP..I~~' 8 I ~ECTlCI"'1 CoPl'RP 1; _~~EaA'" ~O>JW: '!Ii I ~E9:....ro: !:ET ~ "'O\.\€R peLt -) ! CUY "ME [EJ &1 mem" tP:...t-isrOO~[R ~~l.~~~~~ OJ . JoI4,ll BOY ~ _jSI';f'; e--- ~ .. OE";"'''RIPTIO~: 'NA T[P VALVE nFi:[ Hl')R'At,T wATEP. METER o ~ " I:l .. . fI! a:o I'> ---e- if $.mTI.R~' 1J~I"'J"Ol[ j C!.[,I,"! OOf CUIl:EJ IULE:T ll~U:T OFlAI"AGE I.IMlrlOl[ loI,1J'u,IXE GAS MfTEP. GAS VA,lV[ DEClIJIJ::lUS TP.[[ CWifEf<OUS TREE C'.u'HE"D UI:CTPIC :"ltJE L1MJERGP.OU~ID E:LEC~IC LI1.;C~R~OU'JO T(LEPHar~E Vt'A1!R lll.! GAS ur,f( ~PC!!lE~e1~E_ LEGEND: ~I.ICHT O~h DoE:\::~~~' 1'- I rt(JlVl' DUll f'...'[IoIO.T o ~.. .~. ~We.'f p/t',l(tJE1H ..r.:'~ :'; COtlCP.flL P':'o'U,I(rJl I fA' _ "!'60 C!Y~CR:n: CURB I <i~ 2' ':Cf~CP.[i! D.JRB .:,.I'm CVTT-::R ~9 ~ COfJCP:[TE cu...e oVID w"'u..:: @ I "',o,J~OICAP "Sl'olBOl @ ~ ,t.i~OtCA.F RAMF ~ 1,.v.QIC!o.P SOl :>ETAI~ tISH, t OCTAlL O1/C-'O OETAJl D2IC7,O DEl~ll OJ/CO 0 O::V,'1. o~/c;.() DETAil 05/C7.0 DETAIL OO/C;O CEMll 0,;C7.0 [;(l)lll 08;C70 crUllt 09/C7_U OE TAil lCjC70 ~~TES 1 ALL CO':S!'HUCTlQU fIl(lHOO5 ...1~D !td:,T[R'AL,S MUST CCf'I.r~lA TO :UR=!nIT S"'~ID"'f;OS: AIJJ sPECIr:CA11or-~S 0: J1.fE :rornAL. STt,f(, C~II,TY, en,., Of.! lOi:AJ. RfOl.IPFt.4E'r;TS. \'MICH('.t:l< H~,'" .IIJR1SOCTI1l'1 _' ALL r:.,pO(tIIG STR1PE5 tR[. TO E( 4. P....It,TED WHIT[, U'llES~ DTI-E?'''''~T IJOiU) cr-.l TkE Cl-L)l.'~S. [j(T~ll$. ()~ ~anC.:TlOr,s. j. A~.l D""EtlSIOf~5 4P.[ 70 reer o~ pllo~~'EtIT OR F,:o.cr: or CUPB, 'o'IIrlfRr ;'PPlICtBlf:. of A,L.l .,!u[llSJCYJS ~ TI) Ot.;TS1Dt F,s,;[ rT 8P:'C~: (jP r~C1f~~ MA.TE"P.IAI.. VME:."U APPLIC"'EhL ::. Tl1f ('.)!'ITR.\:TOR SI'-AL.l '/(Fllf" f ;'U ::llI'.1fNSIGNS, ..1,0 EL[V;.IIOW. IN 1l1[ rrtw +--,t!'IO!( 10 14<:" ~'r'-P., CT cO/'I~rnueTl{r'J. 'HE CDl'ITR~CTI3'?- SHl.lL il~ P.["SP~ISIBL[ lOR :":..1. nUD :,l1:,1[I,SlO/'IS ~UD (lE:'JATlCtlS :::UR"~C ~ OHIRf ((\1"/STRUCTlC*l :;C~rOl"_~ .F .t\I"IT ClSc.?EPAtIClES .-.RE FOU~U: It. T1-i(!:l P(AHS rl101.1 .CTU""'-- Ilno QrM(NSlQtlS., il-f[ COOIPA.C[Ofo' ""'II !;OUT,.l,CT 't1[ EtIC>iME.EP. 11\I1.I(D04.TU','. [; gRO,.,t"J; SMOOTH TP.)I~S;TlOfl rRCIA ~jrM.' ,0,..'/[0 :.R[AS TO (xI'5Tl"G !"REA" "I.S I~~:ESSAR { a.t.l AREAS '.'rH(P.( PP.QP'OSED Pi\V(MOH ~([TS E'~!STIf~:; PAo.rUr'iT "P-" E";'';fIt.C (tCE CJ= I'1A'.[MErH 'SiI"U or rRCE or All I.OO'SE llrBRlS: fuE EO~[ (J E:.aSlltlG ASPI-'-"!.T PA'....E)~E!H ~Ml BE ""POPE~_V s~.:,:.u.. ,....,lH 4. :,100' COAT t~;-_fEC!'I1o.L '~, .u. APEI,S ~EP.E 'IE'..... ..srr--&ol-LT ,o...~.f.J.I~'JI; 13 11JrttC....r[[J TO ;(-'11' Etl!".i1rJG "U. (,,_:"1/.I1EO .v:![,IS TO 8t: ]([)([) ':'I~D,OR' ~OOJ([) Af"TE~ FI"&-; CRJo.)H:;' iJl~~(SS OiHEfl:-MS( "OTEO -"\l..L ~J['M.. f SCOOED1SHD[p ARE,AS ~H"'II M~'1f ,. ~lt1l1oliJP,l ,~ 4" OF lOP~l. HI)L[) ~. JOWN 1 nwlol f".l\-:I.I::n- [il:'!PIOI'.J t:urHr~;'i";Hlt~ TO '.jUPpt." ";w.,,, "U~OI IMI[P[ ~'S.) :.EtO r-l}S SEW ~L~lTffi d ?:E~u,"";;'::t. or. PECDrI"SlR'.;C1 41 t..E.;::iT 1::> ~'GI"ol,l CCl~Olll(t.S ...LlollR;::..S 'M<[PE n<.c..rrn.." By cQtHR..crc-PS, ~;J9cor'J1P.~=T~S OR SUPPlI[kS ~A"..( O........:.Gf:D fJ:'SUtIC ......'JO.1Ef.l l",""'jS OR CTl1~F' IM~Q'IfMnjJS ()lJRiIJ(; C::J'SI.~'JC'I[J'-.I, ArTEP C'J'I'5TRlJ:nQfI \\IOPt; ,~ c:.or,iPL~TE. '1 ALL "lllll~ mrrKI.E. oIIll\trt.J!.o r[rT ,~.. D':'\'LW,Jll ~>H.\ll t4: CUI.lf--'l.llU.... B.s.et:ndC' ...."'1 CP.ArIUlAP e"'CH'lL :"L!. l:'::WI Itl[)tG~Tn:l '5Ht.l1. Flf C[I~STRUCT[[) 15 r:F-!'t:!Jl"lop' ll,J"'t.:~ II" ", 106 t~ 30 ::> \5 ~-- I 1'1 IT!:T ~ . ;,.,~~ '" 30 ft (~:IU"'U) "CRn-) ',0 I REVISION RECORD ~..,..,;~I~~'::~/',,, i~~~~~T~~~~ (:( 5= ):} ~ .,.~..~,.t'!:,.:J' $" ?-"'" ~~~~,~....,. I"'...Il"'" ~----L 1'tJ.5::? IT 1) . ,DATE: 06/12/2008 I OWN BY: TCN CH<D. BY: RRH SCAlE: I" - 30' ~~ 06/12/2008 c:~ Vltu LLI LLJ < O~Z :cVl~ Vl~~ f-Cl~ ...... ~ LLJ ...J UJ ~ O~~ f-ou VI~ o z :5 Cl... L.L.I f- VI [:J--EJ PROJECT NlMIER 07-249 r CO~OCTfON I 1- PLAN HUr.eER C2.0 ~S!L~OF VI tlVlO t)~ \~ ~4> ~t ....... ~._0. Ito'~' v,",,,, 1= ~o;r~T " ~:~T ~ ~~~~'-> 8 WEST ELEVATION 1/r' . f-Q' THIS DRAWING REPRESENTS THE SIZE AND LOCATION FOR THE BUILDING SIGNAGE. THE ACTUAL SIGNAGE WILL BE DETERMINED AT A LATER TIME WHEN THE ACTUAL TENANTS HAVE BEEN DETERMINED. IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDINGS ALONG OLD MERIDIAN STREET WILL BE LIMITED TO BUILDING SIGNAGE, WITH INDIVIDUAL TENANT SIGNAGE LOCATED WITHN SIGN BANDS THREE (3') FEET HIGH, LIMITED TO EIGHTY PERCENT (80%) OF EACH OCCUPIED BAY, AS DEPICTED ABOVE. IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE WILL EITHER BE ,BACK-LIGHTED OR LIGHTED BY GOOSENECK LIGHTS BUILDING MOUNTED ABOVE THE SIGN BAND. LOGOS WILL BE PERMITTED, LIMITED TO LETTER HEIGHT. COLOR VARIATIONS TO ACCOMODATE TENANT LOGOS AND TYPICAL SIGN ,COLORATION (Le., SUBWAY'S, STARBUCKS, STOUTS, VERIZON, ETC.). o~ bVtol r~vt. ~.,"IU"'"" ~\~~\" \.. Pr'!:"19J'J /~~.~,j/o-fi'i""-(.p;\ Fl.! No. \~\ \: \<:I;::-::~/:; ~~~'~1. ,,7:[1' t <:..~~,~' "IIIJII"I" Peterson Architecture ~ rublmy 51"",,, Su:r. a ~s..i~ IN 40000 p317nOD1.~ f '317.11[;.9118 stUd~.6rsonm~-nn:.com () z 0 ~ UJ ~ ~ UJ " <( 0 0 Z Z <( 0 Z :2 ..J - ~ 0 :J 0 Q-q: Z [I] ilZ~ <( ~- ..J -.J 02 " :i: ~-i ::J ~~ z ..... z w m o-~ Z II: ;1! <( :;;: ~ ..J W ll.. Z ::) Z 0 0 I- ~ 0 CJ) :J a: I- CJ) Z 0 0 caaP1llAL DESIr.N MAr 2,21:Wll """""'"' ffi ~ &,,~ &" W'" ffi l!i'\'f'" &" ~ PLOT OAfE-. 't.e&.Dto.r; 0FIA'WtIl !rr. 0ECtB:l BY' PRO.ECT ~ "'-I%IeI:l' EXTERlCR ELEvATIOl5 A201 1\.E!Il!~~NE6I~II~~ 4CI ~ M'1J!E:)Ot..y II~WTWE= ......- ... f'fTER!>CN A~~TEGTJi':E, Pc. "'C!~lfttw~~l'\All't1"'olU! .IITIOJ11a'~IIR11I:H~Q f'E~.l.~..Ri.Pc. .:.u~Vlc;go"l""',",r..crT1CI'l~ li(,oonUl!:~a'~r~c. &..: '~...~<"'-~;r~~ -;....1.... .4..(~,...': .,\r.-r,,~. I~!l!-""H "'-1'":\-"-'-~"""'~ -"I .1. ":.l~., ~.""'J.-- ~"'I""-' - ~ '" -.~ -.-. - ~...... II.- ~ ..,..~ ~-. ..? "-'\'\\'~\'L\I'Pi!;""" l~~~n~t:;.f~;% N( No, \~~ t \AR~:O~lH) * J \""",,;".f:lr,~...t..~~ ..i ~"I,,;,~,\~,~l'~~'\\ Peterson Architecture SOl Muibmy StI~_ Suli~ G ~"ij,c, IN 46000 P 311/T097'4 f317110,0718 'Sb.idia@peler:wnmmre...4'.JTa,[::OOl IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDINGS ALONG OLD MERIDIAN STREET WILL BE LIMITED TO BUILDING SIGNAGE, WITH INDIVIDUAL TENANT SIGNAGE LOCATED WITHN SIGN BANDS THREE (3') FEET HIGH, LIMITED TO EIGHTY PERCENT (80%) OF EACH OCCUPIED BAY, AS DEPICTED BELOW. IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE WILL EITHER BE BACK-LIGHTED OR LIGHTED BY GOOSENECK LIGHTS BUILDING MOUNTED ABOVE THE SIGN BAND. LOGOS WILL BE PERMITTED, LIMITED TO LETTER HEIGHT. COLOR VARIATIONS TO ACCOMODATE TENANT LOGOS AND TYPICAL SIGN COLORATION (Le., SUBWAY'S, STARBUCKS, STOUTS, VERIZON, ETC.). q~ ,?-r q\oS{- " !zZ ~ 0 ~ -.J ..J :::> ~ CD o (J) ~ w tE 0 QI ~ (J) tu ~ a: :::> ~ 0 z ~ CJ) vs-f \"'2- ~ . ?;~I ~Z-I THIS DRAWING REPRESENTS THE SIZE AND LOCATION FOR THE BUILDING SIGNAGE. THE ACTUAL SIGNAGE WILL BE DETERMINED AT A LATER TIME WHEN THE ACTUAL TENANTS HAVE BEEN DETERMINED. ,/ ~~:'~~ DO DO DO ~~ urn ~m~.._" ~ /'/ ~/ (j z t-=" z w ~ ill CJ <i Z <i ~ it 0 ~~ Z ~- <i C1.2 ("! cl..1 V ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ...J a.. Z o I- o ::J a: I- ro Z o o P'l.OT OATB '~!-tx.-12 ~'f;Ilj~, OiE(XHl BY, F"ROJECT "I.>>.I88't ~'.0021 EXTERIOR ELEVATIO'I5 (2) WEST ELEVATION 1/8' - 1-0' A201 'II-Hot ~f'C.tIo....: c.MN" COFooa N1[lf>>.t,o:,U.f'f'iMDOITllfI.lR!I.;.Wtfr:l"'l' ~.... 1FE':!.~ftA:f1~I'".c.. ""G1~lJ5tM~'OII-1ol.'l!f!:~ II1'1odIIhof~~CD~~ ~~Cil.A:_""L. AU-o-..CJ:P'_AOO;;:unc::t<LIlIoi "~AIIIII!~'~T~"". .~ JO _....~~\~1I1P;:J";....., f.f;;~V."i1i,ff';'--- {?Ii No. \~\ ~*\ AA1'l5111l143 !*; ~\... ~.,..;:_:~_...<' ,,~i ~'."ffr~,~~,~~,\"'~ Peterson Architecture B02 Mu:tmny Stroot Suire G NotIe.svif~, ~H .4(\{J60 P 317.770,9,14 t 3"_170g-rl~ Sl>Jc!O@Pe~"""'.ect"",com o ~ I- o Z o --I ~ CD I- ~ o I- \~ (f) v-v)- { (J Z o -1 ::) m -1 <t I- ill a::: 3= ill Z COlCEPnJAL DE!'l1Cii """e 2fUooe to' aJJot;. LEtTER! Cf'l M (,lAM J TO I~TFr TI-E ~el\E&!J It'lOOlE !!lATe a.t. .,., ~'-D' " ol.'-e' .olo~"" Q'.l T~ 6..45& TO IDENTIFT aJ5~ I-QR!i f"'Ct.:ff'Mi~ ~.Eli ~ .'"""'Ill=L~1 FT T>-e &..!NE!6 HO.HT n.e VE~nCAL MCE a= l4o;: AlIJ.,toG &~ L~ m"'" ~~ & m"" &.~"" A"" '" T'E "''''''' TO 10000TFT J E:lU5"fE!6~.~~AI. fn!5CM:l. r:::~ IolOTE, ;\.fI5 I!':, T'rPICAL FOR: EAC"Jo'li:NA'ofllN.'''f;~It-(J: o EAST ELEVAllON 1/4' - 1-0' PLOT DATE< DP.A.WMB'Y> 0ECl(E) "" PRO..eCT .......... &rc.NJ>6E R.AN A204 <I :1j ~ ~ l.l t) z r-: z w ~ w o <( z <( ~ o z <( CJ z z Z <t -l (L Z o l- t) ::) I!: CI) z o () 1~'U..~ ",.~': "\.I.5:~K6.1,1;1[Co/'..elIlf~t:-ec.e .lI.(::&ioUll.!ltlHDot..YH~WI~ ~"'" FE~ ,b.fOJ:J.lfTEC''''~. PC loJOl'JfI.IFfi;l.I'.EOClt\PUC..4na.;""","-~l"V'Of U1\oOJ1'fl,(~lJlllTTD.IaJa:J.l1~ 1"E'IP!Ot Jo,~ol.ITEC'11RE. 'PC .lUlME!t~MD~l."" -':~6.u:r:~T~GI'Goid,.~m. ~ A~ 0/'l11-1E:. a..A561t:; DENTFY a6lNio-56.I-VJRS, ~faa.lAl PE~.~G. (0 EAST ELEVAllON 1}4'-1-o' rn rn 3'.er '" .. NCJTf, ''''50 15 T'fP'CAL ft;,l(' E.ll.D< ILNtoNI N T~ aJU:l'lot":a 'L ... ~ e;.co:. L.E1'E~ 1'0 Op.,TFY M !'JU&lI'E.f6 ~ c::N lJ..4: ~,",,1CAl =ta a T.wE .6J.INtJ<. "........,~,L"JPi!l:"I'I'.I'~.. ,i€,,,'''it./,.,, <;. {:(:I~'~~'m ":;\ \~....::~-,.~,' ./ -.,t,!CNITt\,"'" 11'''"11111\\1 Peterson Architecture 00"2 Muihony Sb'0l'd. Suite G NolJIe1,-vIf.".IIl-le06!J p:;17.71(l.971~ f 311.T7DilT16 sa"jio@p"IE~<€ct"",.""", (j Z CJ t-"" z f- Z W Z ~ W - 0 W ~ 0 [L --l <( 0 - Z ~ ::J <( w ~ > (D W 0 0 (1) .. Z ?i ill :2 <( U W 0 LL 0 :~ Z LL Z 0 I z - <( -1 (f) ~ <( [L tu r- z a: ::J 0 f- ~ 0 0 ill ::) Z r- ~ CJ) Z 0 0 coaPTUAl. DESIGN -U- Y :30. 2000 FEVB:N> &~ ~ Im'r'" S~ &-, fW'" &. Im'r'" n...aro.aTE 21!lC6-D6--II! CAAWN 11f. ~UT' f'!lO.ECT .....- "".iP.'Jom1 51c.w.c;E R.A'l A204 T_Uf,~4'iII!i.lioIv9l"""'~ ~ew.u.el::Ui!lUlMlpt~'c;lTl€ ~"'" FE~ A~TEC'l.M"_ ~c l.I;anEJl.IJ!t:~~1~t'lAT!lfH.oof: U1H:)J'!M~~TTI.N(;Q&:.>ll"," FETEJC!OO A~TE~ F..c:. ,I,I,J.~~.QQ~L..<4I It'~I~~~~Y~C. e? :::J ,1'llmJ",., 0 ~ ~l~~~~~._~...".~'I'",,~~~ :~ 7 ~ ~..t.V.... M ~,......,."..,; .c:.:~ :2 i~;? rj ~ ~ i.,i\ e OJ ~ '.Jr;; :z '" i ~'i'E' <( 'il ill ~ \t.\. ~>~/ c: <li ~ ;'" g ",,~L'" ~" ~ f" ~ i '1.. r'(f. \\~\.. L:' W oJ'! '''..""....', Q) ~ 'l: ~ g, 1D~~; ~ o.a1:!!~ ~ " ' , ~ ~ ~ Ii I Ii ~C') '" ~ ~ ~O ~ ri d UlC\I II- ~ LhL~~ !<( ~ i!' Iii 1~~~~<8 ~ f U ~ ~ :JNI .lN3~30VNV~ GNV ONINNVld NOI1:Jnl:l1SNO:J VNVIClH 'l3WS';t:l OMl ONIOllns ln01S ONIOllns 1lV 131:1 M3N 4- J\ -.::P ~ it " s ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 z o ~ w ~i 0' z~ \ ~~ ~'/ ..... ~ ~ " ~o "" .~l ~~ ~~~~~i' ih~un~ '~~~~ih~ ~~~~ u~ ~I Ii hih~ ~~ ~ ~i <.1.' '- ::J ",\\IIII~I/jjjt'" ~ ~ i/.::-~t~'~--',,"A ~ ~ ~ olr:'''O~.~,~o,-,ij :Ii ~,J~:Z ~ ~ ~! 5:"~ <t; It ~ ~ \~'~" ~ ","::tc,,/ 5 <il ...:! l< ........~hi...;- ""........ en~; ~ 1 It''ljW''l1\~\ .....Q) B , g ~ ...,:=J!C"- ~ Q) '" 2'i e:: '\I o...~i~ ii ,,~ ~ ,,"' i~~ ~~ 'ONI '1N3~3nV'NV'V'>l GNV' ONINN'v'ld NOI10nillSNOO VNI'I<lNI '13\...!o'V::> ONIGllnS 830HS In018 -LN3~dOI3^30 3~1=:l=:lOnl\f.L3~ M3N " . , ~ ~ t ~ ~ C") d) ~ ti w a ~ 0 <t ~. w i'! ~ ~ ~ C\.I u. >- w ~ ~~i~Lh ~ <t: ~ ~ ~ U ;]5 1~<9~~<;i ~ i ~ l/ s:. 4 IV ... :Ii ~ ~ (J') S ~~ 'L0 j ~ ~ Z ~> 0 c:s:- ~ ~ iIi -I w 5! ;. 0' ~ CJ)~ ,.... ~ ~ ., 10 ~"!E ~ ~~iB~2~ ~ It ~sl'l~' i~!i~ e~(j ~~ ~~;~ ~I~!~ I~ ~M~~ ~i ~m~~ ,~ ~s;~ Page 1 of3 Conn, Angelina V _,~"~~<~~"c=,,.M-'. """,~""''''"'''''''-~'~--~''''' From: Richard Hoover [rhoover@Civil-Designs.com] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 10:38 AM To: McBride, Mike T; Duncan, Gary R; Barnes, David R Cc: Conn, Angelina V; Michael C. Cook Subject: FW: Stout Project Attachments: mixed medical zone - camp plan exhibit.pdf Gentlemen, Any response yet? We really need to have an answer. Thanks, Dik Dik Hoover Civil Designs, LLP 2415 Directors Row, SuiteE Indianapolis, indiana 46241 Tel 317"244-1968 Fax 317-244-1969 Cell 317-441-8682 l"";;",_.,,,.._,..,,^,..~..~o.u,;'.~'~~:;->"~.~w_ - From: Richard Hoover Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 10:58 AM To: 'McBride, Mike T; Duncan, Gary R; 'Barnes, David R' Cc: Michael C. Cook; hbstout318@yahoo.com; 'Conn, Angelina V' Subject: FW: Stout Project Gentlemen, After 0 discussion with Brad Stout, we have the following to present as a solution to the driveway issues that hove been raised. . 1. South Drive.: As sll9gested, we will move the drive north such that the north face of curb will line up with the.south edge of the 8' walk. The parkingwill be reconfigured accordingly. 2. North Drive: Please refer to the attached" drawing provided by Angle and created by St. Vincent. It appears that some type of bui Iding is to be constructed in the future "to the north of our property with a drive entrance between the stout property and the St. Vincent property. We imagine this drive entrance will be either the loop road as shown or more likely a commercial entrance of some kind. We would like to make a commitment to work with St. Vihcent or the future property owner to connect to this drive/loop road and close our north drive at that time, subject to the approval of St. Vincent. The timing for the development of the property to the north is unknown, and the costs associated with this future work are unknown as well. The benefits to this are as follows. a. A green area for landscaping between the two properties is retained. b. A variance from BZA to eliminate the required landscape yard aiong Stout's north property line is not required. c. Our progress through the approval process is not delayed. We would like to have a r.esponse as soon as possible So that we con work out the wording of the commitment on Monday prior to Plan Commission. 8/1812008 Page 1 of 1 Conn, Angelina V From: Hollibaugh, Mike P Sent: Friday, August 15, 20083:05 PM To: McBride, Mike T; 'Steve Bates' Cc: Barnes, David R Subject: RE: Stout Site/a.M. Master Plan - Lighting Attachments: mixed use section.PDF; retail section.pdf Attached is concept sketches for Old Meridian mixed use district and retail district. Mike, I'm wondering if the light standard for the "retail section" might be more appropriate in the area of the roundabout. Steve, please take a look at both drawings and try to match up what is illustrated. Thanks Mike Hollibaugh Ph. 571 2422 "~,.,~~~_.,._~.."._~,~=,,,,..-.~~______~"-__''''"'"c~= From: McBride, Mike T Sent: ThursdaYI August 141 2008 11:29 AM To: Steve Bates; Hollibaugh, Mike P Cc: Barnes, David R Subject: Stout Site/O.M. Master Plan - Lighting Steve, I'm hoping you can help me with something, We have a commercial development that is proposed on Old Meridian Street just north of Main St. The City, several years ago, developed a master plan for the old meridian district that incorporated land use planning and architectural design and lighting concepts that were desired in the Old Meridian District. Mike Hollibaugh, director of planning, has a conceptual sketch of the lighting that was contemplated by our architectural consultant. We were wondering if you might be able to show us some real products that would be similar in style to those conceptualized in order that we might provide that information to the developer to include in the site development. Mr. Hollibaugh will send you the conceptual sketches to get you started. Thanks, 0lLdu"J1 2'. 0n:.<:ffiwk, fr, 6), City Engineer City Of Carmel Indiana One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 phone: (317) 571-2441 fax: (317) 571-2439 8/1812008 RE: Cannel Drive- Range Line Overlay street lights Page 1 of2 Conn, Angelina V From: Richard Hoover [rhoover@Civil-Designs.com] Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 11 :02 AM To: McBride, Mike T; steveb@techlitecorp.com; Hollibaugh, Mike P Cc: hbstout318@yahoo.com; Conn, Angelina V; Barnes, David R; Duncan, Gary R; Michael C. Cook Subject: RE: Carmel Drive- Range "-ine Overlay street lights Mike, Thanks for the response, As soon as we get a response to the email I just sent regarding the drives, I will revise our site plan and get that over to Steve'. I do appreciate your help in getting this lightihg straightened out. Dik Dik Hoover Civil Designs, LLP 2415 Directors Row,Suitc E Indianapolis, indiana 46241 Tel 317-244-1968 Fax 317~244-1969 Cell 317-441-8682 ~"._~'_~~_""__M~""" '~H'~~~_~~_~_~'_~~___~'~ -~~----_'_--~-~-~-'~-~-~'-----~'-< ~__ ,___ _'~_~~~~_'_~"__,','_~".'_.""_.'.~_">""~_"~_'.'_'_'_'_',__'._"~'L'_~.,""""^"" ""^,,,",.,,,_,~,,~_~_~__~,~'_b~,_'_,"",'~~,'_-_C C '.-"_,_,__,___'~_,_"".",,',,,,",__"~~~~___,~"m",__'"'__''''__''''_~Y~'",~~,C'^'''"~'^'__''''__'"~^~~''_ .__"'~._.'~~..'~..~'''._ '. ..~... m' ,.. ,.. ,..."..~ __'___H'~' _.. ",._m.~~m.~'" From: McBride, Mike T [mailto:MMcBride@carmel.in.gov] Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 7:47 AM To: steveb@techlitecorp.com; Richard Hoover; Hollibaugh, Mike P Cc: hbstout318@yahoo.com; Conn, Angelina V; Barnes, David R; Duncan, Gary R Subject: RE: Carmel Drive:" Range Line Overlay street lights . Dik, I do not believe that the street lights that you have attached in your initial email to Steve are the lights that planning dept. had envisioned for the Old Meridian District. They are more specific to old town and the Rangelirie Rd. corridor. The attached exhibit is a concept that was deveioped by the consultants under the direction of the planning dept.. and I believe is more representative of what is desired in the Old Meridian Corridor. I willie! Mr. Hollibaugh correct me if I am wrong. I've asked Steve Bates to assist in providing a lighting option thafis consistent with the style depicted in the attached sketch. Thanks, 0lLo~ad g, 0l~81<Mk., ry.&. City Engineer City Of Cannel Indiana One Civic Square Cannel, IN 46032 phone: (317) 571-2441 fax: (317) 571-2439 From: steveb@techlitecorp.com [mailto:steveb@techlitecorp.com] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 20086:33 PM Tc: Richard Hoover Cc: hbstout318@yahoo.com; McBride, Mike Ti Conn, Angelina V Subject: Re: Carmel Drive- Range Line Overlay street lights 8/18/2008 Page] of2 Conn, Angelin'a V From: Barnes, David R Sent: Thursday, August 14, 20081 :24 PM To: 'Richard Hoover'; Conn, Angelina V; Duncan, Gary R; Bob McGill; hbstout318@yahoo.com; Michael C. Cook . Cc: Hollibaugh, Mike P; Jerry Williams Subject: RE: Stout Project Dik: Prior to receiving your below e-mail Mike McBride and I looked over the plans and have the following comments: We would desire to see you move the southern entrance north approximately 60' to a spot where the drive's northern edge would match up with the proposed 8' sidewalk. Parking should be able to be transferred to the southern side of the drive and there should be enough "flex" in the drive alignment for provision of access to the outlot south of your tract. The northern entrance has a couple of options which might be considered. One is to work with the owner of the tract to your north (St. Vincent) to create a drive which would center on the property line. The second is to construct the drive on the northern portion of your tract, commitment to a future "shared" drive agreement with the current or future property owner to the north during future development and commit to modifying your drive to work with the north tract when future development does occur there. The street lighting was discussed with the Department of Community Services this morning and a street lighting fixture for that area is being sought for preference by all parties. This fixture would be detailed for your use upon said agreement. From: Richard Hoover [mailto:rhoover@Civil-Designs.com] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 11:40 AM To: Conn, Angelina V; Duncan, Gary R; Bob McGill; hbstout318@yahoo.com; Michael C. Cook Cc: Hollibaugh, Mike P; Jerry Williams; Barnes, David R Subject: Stout Project Angie, I spoke with Dave Barnes of the Engineering Department late yesterday, and based on his meeting with Mike McBride and Gary Duncan, he presented me with the Engineering Department's comments regarding the Stout project and the issues still outstanding. The items addressed were as follows. 1. South Drive: The Engineering Department would like to have this drive moved to a point that is 200 feet north of the round-a-bout. Dave and I looked at the plan, and we believe we can utilize the drive servicing the parking on the south side of the south building as the entrance to the site without causing a significant change to the site. We would need to revise the following with ramifications as noted below. a. Maintain the 8 spaces on the north side of the drive (south end of the building). b. Add 5 more spaces on the south side of the drive. c. Determine how to adjust future bank drive-through in the future...this could include losing a portion of the 5 new spaces in the future. If there isn't a drive-through in the future, this becomes moot. d. Lose two on-street parking spaces. e. Reconfigure the streetscape (island at midpoint and retaining wall columns) to make it more symmetrical as it's shown today. f. Adjust the landscaping as necessary at the new entrance area. 2. North Drive: The Engineering Department would like to move this drive to the north and center it on the north property line. The ramifications are as follows. 8/14/2008 Page 2 of 2 a. The sidewalk area on the north end of the building would be about 24 feet wide. i. Possible outdoor seating area. II. Possible additional planting area between parking and building III. Possibly increase the distance between the buildings which might necessitate another appearance before the BZA and Special Studies Committee and change the elevations between the buildings again. b. Add two on-street parking spaces that were lost on the south end. c. Parking count in this off-street parking area can remain the same. d. Eliminate nearly all of the landscaping along the north property line. e. PROBLEM: We will be working on the adjoining parcel and would need the owner's cooperation/permission since we do not control that property. This will create a significant delay in the start of construction and would delay approvals from the City. r. RECOMMENDATION: Allow the drive to remain as currently located. This eliminates having to obtain the cooperation/permission of the adjacent land owner, eliminates any delays in the project, and contains everything within the limits of the property under development. 2. The Engineering Department thinks we should be the ones who determine if the outlet pipe has capacity. They stated there are no current drainage problems/issues with this pipe. Our drainage report states that the pipe has sufficient capacity. J. The Engineering Department believes the lighting fixture should be specified by the Planning Department to ensure consistency with the street lighting previously specified by the Planning Department for uSe in this area. 4. The Engineering Department believes the conflicts with the Master Plan should be resolved by the Planning Department. I would like to set up a meeting between the engineering and planning departments and us to finalize what needs to be done with this site and gather the information we need to accomplish this task. Because of the short amount of time we have left between now and the August 19th Plan Commission meefing, I would like for this to happen no later than Friday morning. Both Bob McGill and I will need sufficient time to make whatever changes are necessary to present a final product to the Plan Commission. Thanks, Dik Dik Hoover Civil Designs, LLP 2415 Directors Row, Suite E ImJianapolis, Indiana 46241 Tel 317-244-1968 Fax 317-244-1969 Cell 317-441-8682 8/14/2008 Page 1 of 2 Conn, Angelina V From: Richard Hoover [rhoover@Civil-Designs.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 11 :25 AM To: mcook@woodmclaw.com; hbstout318@yahoo.com; Bob McGill; Dave Griffee Cc: Conn, Angelina V; Hollibaugh, Mike P; McBride, Mike T Subject: FW: Stout Project Gentlemen, We are finalizing the landscape plan ond will have that ready. for our submittal to Angie on Thursday. We will olso submit the revised lighting plan that addresses Angie's comments without the street lighting. We can't address the remaining items without the information we need from the Engineering Department, so we will go with what we currently hove. I will have a letter of explanation for Thursday's submittal outlining the remaining unresolved issues. After that, we have no choice but to either be continued by the Plan Commission for a month of lost time or to convince them that we will continue to work diligently with the Engineering Department to resolve their issues in the hopes that they will approve us. Thanks, Dik Dik Hoover Civil Designs, LLP 2415 Diredors Row, Suite E Indianapolis, Indiana 46241 Tel 317-244-1968 Fax 317.244.1969 Cell 3] 7 -441-8682 From: Barnes{ David R [mailto:dbarnes@carmel.in.gov] Sent: Tuesday{ August 12, 2008 8:02 AM To: Richard Hoover Subject: RE: Stout Project Dik: T have not received any info to pass on to you as of this morning, will attempt to get with Gary to try to get some answers for you when he comes in. From: Richard Hoover [mailto:rhoover@Civil-Designs.com] Sent: Monday, August 11, 20089:40 PM To: Duncan{ Gary R; Barnes, David R Cc: Conn{ Angelina V; mcook@woodmciaw.com; McBride, Mike T; hbstout318@yahoo.com; Bob McGill; Hollibaugh, Mike P Subject: Stout Project Gary and David, Have you been able to address the questions and outstanding issues on the Stout Project? As a reminder: I. Street Light Fixture? 2. South DrIVe - wi II it be allowed:> 3. Capacity/Sufficiency of outlet for pond? 4. Issues regarding Master Plan - Do we just ignore:> 8/13/2008 Page 2 of 2 We really need to have these issues addressed by the Engineering Department. Angie is expecting revised drawings.and information for the Plan Commission this Thursday, and we can't finalize our plans. As a note, we met with Scott Brewer this afternoon and are completing the Landscape Plan per his recommendations. Thanks, Dik Dik Hoover Civil Designs, LLP 2415 Directors Row, Suite E Indianapolis, Indiana 46241 Tel 317-244-1968 Fax 317-244-1969 Cell 317-441-8682 8/1312008 Page 1 of2 Conn, Angelina V ~._-"~,~""",~,.,.....,~...~-_..._"~~._.~~; From: Richard Hoover [rhoover@Civil-Designs.com] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2008 1 :54 PM To: Conn, Angelina V Cc: hbstout318@yahoo.com; mcoOk@woodmclaw.com; Bob McGill; Dave Griffee Subject: RE: Stout Project - info packets due today Angie, I'll verify with Mike Cook, but I believe that we haven't changed the buildings since the last submittal, and the only changes are the oneS involving the site, landscaping, and lighting. As you know, Scott Brewer waS on vacation, and we have a meeting with him on Monday. We're still waiting on additional information from the engineering department. That information includes the lighting fixtures to use on the street which affects our lighting plan, verification of the outlet for storm, whether or not they will allow the south drive, and the resolution of the master plan issues they brought up which could have a significant impact upon the site. Thanks, Dik Dik Hoover Civil Designs, LLP 2415 Directors Row, Suite E Indianapolis, Indiana 46241 Tel 317-244-1968 Fax 317-244-1969 Cell 317-441-8682 . . '........_....,."...,._..,~~"=::~_==:::'_==~~~~="o::-.c;,::.:;,:.::!:-::;;:,:,:"';::;c,-=,~-C:~'_~~~~_.~,'~::'~,:~.'.__._.~,.~M~_.__,~~~."".;"~~,v., """""""'^"<~~_'~'_~"~_'_'____"W__""""'~'."""""___"_"___'__'_'_'_,~~___.m_.__~_.~<'~'~_'_~ . .. .,n...,'.....'..,.....,.........,w'."....",_... '_.,_..,_"._.~._ __ ..__"o..mw_ __ ~.~.~ ," __ .on" ..<n.., __.w__~.,_.~_....__.__~,~w_,_ ,__"..",." ..,n......,.... ._..__._~_.. From: Conn, Angelina V [mailto:Aconn@carmel.in.gov] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2008 12: 13 PM To: Richard Hoover Cc: hbstout318@yahoo.com; mcook@woodmclaw.com; Bob McGill; Dave Griffee Subject: RE: Stout Project - info packets due today Are you submitting revised info packets today, so that we can mail them out with the august 19 plan commission agenda? They were due at noon... Angie Conn, Planning Administrator Dept. ofCornmunity Services - Planning & zoning 1 Civic Square, 3rd Floor City of Carmel, IN 46032 p.317-571-2417 f.317-571-2426 aconn@carmel.in.gov From: Richard Hoover [mailto:rhoover@Civil-Designs.com] Sent: Friday, August 08,2008 11:35 AM To: Conn, Angelina V Cc: McBride, Mike T; hbstout318@yahoo.com; mcook@woodmclaw.com; Bob McGill; Dave Griffee; Duncan, Gary R; Barnes, David R Subject: RE: Stout Project Angie, I received a voice mail from Dave Barnes regarding the lighting fixtures, and he said he is waiting on Gary Duncan who is in a meeting this morning. He said he will give me a call back as soon as he. is able to tolk with Gary. He also 8/8/2008 Page 1 of 1 Conn, Angelina V From: Richard Hoover [rhbOver@Civil-Designs.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 6:31 PM To: Duncan, Gary R Cc: Conn, Angelina V; mcook@woodmclaw.com; hbstout318@yahoo.com; McBride, Mike T; Dave Griffee; Mike Thompson Subject: Stout Project Gary, Last evening we met with the Special Studies Committee on the above-referenced project for which we received favorable approval to appear before the August 19th Plan Commission. However, it was mandated that prior to this appearance we must receive approval from the Engineering Department of our plans for which there are a few items outstanding. These include: 1. South drive on Old Meridian (wi II this be allowed?) 2. Storm outlet sufficiency (does this existing pipe haVe capacity?) 3. Reserved ROW detention in freeboard (do we need a variance or is this item: an administrative approval? Process?) 4. Master Plan issues of future ROW/road (is this an issue at this point with engineering?) We believe We have addressed all the other comments from your letter and would like to get a response on these items as soon as possible so we can finalize our plans. Thanks for your help. Dik Dik Hoover Civil Designs, LLP 2415 Directors Row, Suite E Indianapolis, Indiana 46241 Tel 317-244"1968 Fax 317-244-1969 Cell 317-441-8682 8/7/2008 Page 1 of 1 Conn,. Angelina V From: Holmes, Christine B Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 1 :02 PM To: Conn, Angelina V Subject: RE: tat agenda items In other news, the Committee asked for a lot of commitments and conditions last night... .i've deciphered my notes and summarized them, below. (not including the sign petitions) 1. Glass Chimney - subject to landscape plan . 2. Stout's Shoes - must have final lighting plan and final drainage/pond approval from DOE at full Commission, also final landscape approval (I suggested grass-crete or similar for the area adjacent to the parallel parking, instead of the grass ~ concrete - grass they were proposing) and full sign package. The committee also wanted a front elevation that clearly shows the grade change between the parking and the buildings/plaza, and for some provision to be made for rear signage, like door signs. 3. Taco Bell/KFC - The committee wanted copies of Carol's photos of Walgreens and Wendy's at the full . Commission, and Charlie and Scott and I are going to try to work out better screening for the drive-through area. They're re-designing it slightly at Rick's request, to provide more landscaping on the bulb at the south end, and more around the dumpster, to try to visually separate their Drivethrough from Wendy's. As soon as I get that meeting set up, I'll let you know, and they're going to get revisions to you no later than Monday, Friday if they can. 8/6/2008 ~ 07-2-t./;~ C:J Civil Designs August 4, 2008 Steve Cook Water Distribution Manager 3450 W. 131 Street Westfield, IN 46074 RE: Stout Shoes Dear Mr. Cook: Reference is made to your comment letter dated June 17, 2008, regarding the above mentioned project. A copy of this letter is attached. Civil Designs, LLP has reviewed your comments and have addressed them as follows: I. Plan Review Comments 1. "For Water Service and Sewer Lateral Installation: Locate the middle of the Lot and install Water 5' left of that line and Sewer 5' right. A 6' piece of PVC pipe is to be used to mark the water service stub. All service lines are to terminate 8' behind the sidewalk. Should service. Jines be outside these boundaries, it must be noted on print. " Due the layout of the site and location of existing utilities this configuration is not feasible for the project. 2. 'We require 2 sets of paper copy as-builts as well as 2 digital copies drawn with AutoCAD Version 2004 or earlier. These as-built drawings must include streets, lots, water mains, and the measurements between all fittings; (valves, laterals, fittings, service lines). Water will not be turned on or approved until this requirement is fulfilled. " Your comment is noted. 3. "All valves, hydrants, fittings, etc are REQUIRED to be captured using survey grade equipment as GPS points and submitted with as-buifts. More information can be found in the City of Carmel Specs. " Your comment is noted. 4. "The developer's contractor shall be billed for all bacteriological lab services. " Your comment is noted. 5. "All Ductile Iron water mains shall be bedded in sand, from the bottom of the trench to 12" above the pipe. " There are no additional mains proposed for this project. 2415 Directors Row, Suite E Indianapolis, IN 46241 www.civil-designs.com p 317.244.1968 f 317.244.1969 I. . 0 _ . ~ -,' .: - .-4 _-J:;' ," ~- .~~ --;;'I~'~~~ij;~-~it~'fi( ~~i-~::l~~-:'~~:" ":'" ,.~ "".... -" ,.-i;'"'"IV' 'II-~n- J'neer'ln """'"i<w"~~"":',,,..'A", "':' :SJte.0esl n,'"'~',.,'9i"'" -,'70' 0';1'''.''.,,' ",landJ'1lannm to '.0' ~".u.~-.,,:.J."~:._ ';J;..:,"Sl'Irve In .....,""~ =- '~.;-.. I'~""'W'~ ~--::L,,,, ... l~.~ Ii; 1'1 ,.~ ~._~,' a.....,'.'".....~'.~ _"'. ~ n .~ ., ,~,,_ ~._ ~ _. _ i 6. "Fire Hydrants: Sha{{ be Mue{{er (Safety Yellow, MA.B. #0433291, SelWin Wi/Iiams # F75YP2) (Carmel Clay Spec. hydrants shall be open right and will have a safety blue stripe around hydrant bonnet from the factory). The hydrant pumper nozzle shall be of one-piece design, compatible with 5" Storz hose coupling. The nozzle shall be an integral part of the fire hydrqnt and must be furnished by the manufacturer or authorized distributor designated by the manufacturer. Mueller model 290220 for casting and 290221 for cap. Storz adapters will not be accepted." Your comment is noted, the fire hydrant detail and fire department connection have been checked to comply. . . 7. "Blue Reflective Warning Tape must be installed 18" above all water mains. Tracer wire must be installed with all water main laid in Carmel." There are no additional mains proposed for this project. 8. "The developer shall verify the elevations of existing utilities and design plans accordingly. Existing infrastructure shall not be moved to accommodate new developments. " Your comment is noted. 9. "Posi-Caps or the equivalent are now required on all water valve installations." Your comment is noted. 1 O. "You will need to call for an on site meet with the inspector prior to water main installation. " Your comment is noted. 11. "You will also need to have an approved stamped set of prints before starting any construction. " Your commentis noted. This has also been added to the Title Sheet. 12. "There must be a detail sheet that includes a restraint joint chart. " This detail has been added to the revised plans. 13. "UUlity inspectors have the authority to make changes in the field if conditions are warranted. " This comment has been added to the plans. 14. "Master meter inside set." Your comment is noted. 15. "Old setvice line to be terminated at the water main on Main St. " This has been shown on the revised plans. ,16, "Send Water and Sewer drawings separate. " Your comment is noted. Please see revised plans. 17. '~t project completion, as-builts must have all corrections made and submitted in the fol/owing digital and paper formats: a. Files must be submitted on a cd-rom in a jewel case labeled with Engineering Company Name, Project Name, & date CD was burned wlo using file compression in AutoCAD Version 2004 or earlier format. .. There should be one drawing labeled as Water Features with only water pertinent information. b. Certified as-builts shall accurately reflect all field design. As-builts must be stamped "Field Verified" and signed by the developer's registered professional engineer or land surveyor. c. Disc file names shall be clearly labeled and easily identifiable to all users. d. Projection shall be referenced' to NAD83, Indiana State" Plane Coordinate System, East Zone, using U. S. Swvey Feet and per the Hamilton County datum. e. All pertinent drawing elements will reside in the primary drawing .file. There shall be no cells, nodes, blocks, or reference files attached to " the drawing. 1. Tie into section corners in the Indiana State Plane Coordinate System to insure proper orientation. g. All underground fittings shall be marked with lath or PVC and identification for GPS capturing. h. Must show measurements between all fittings with each fitting identified, and water mains identified by size and material. i. The as-builts, both paper and digital, must be revised to show the exact location of all water mains, laterals constructed, hydrants, valves, service lines"& fittings as installed with measurements from a permanent structure (e.g. fire hydrant). j. After installation, actual point coordinate locations for all hydrants, valves, fittings, etc. shall be captured using Survey Grade GPS unit. k. Please visit City of Carmel Specs to view full set of requirements. http://www.ct.carmel.in.us/services/waterofJerations/wateroos.html. This checklist will be followed and completed when the water and wastewater plans are approved. If you should have any other questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to call me. Very truly yours, Civil Designs, LLP ~ IPL--- c:~ 'U-'-L'l Civil Designs August 1, 2008 ~L~ - 4 "rJrQ David Littlejohn , Alternative Transportation Coordinator Department of Community Services One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 ,'""[ ;", RE: Stout Shoes Building DP/ADLS ~ :\ ,/}~\ ./~ '1: ::;' <.i ~-- ~ ~ '..-. DOCS Dear Mr. Littlejohn: Reference is made to your comment letter dated July 10, 2008, regarding the above mentioned project. A copy of this letter is attached, Civil Designs, LLP has reviewed your comments and have, addressed them as follows: I. Plan Review Comments 1. "The City of Carmel Parking Ordinance requires that all commercial and retail venues include bicycle parking. Bicycle parking spaces are required at a rate of five (5) bicycle parking spaces per one hundred (100) automobile parking spaces with a minimum of four (4) spaces. Please revise your plans to show the required bicycle parking spaces on your site. Please see the City of Carmel's Parking Ordinance in order to determine appropriate locations, specifications and construction details for the above." The plans have been updated, please see sheet C2.0 for reference. 2. "The Alternative Transportation Plan requires the construction of a 10' asphalt path along the entire Old Meridian Blvd. and Main St. frontages. Please revise the plans to include and label this path. " The plans have been updated, please see sheet C2.0 for reference. 3. "Please indicate ADA compliant handicap ramps at all crossings. " The plans have been updated, please see sheet C2.0 for reference, If you should have any other questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to call me. Very truly yours, Civil Designs, LLP ~'wl~.. 2415 Directors Row, Suite E Indianapolis, IN 46241 www.civil-designs.com P 317.244.1968 f 317,244.1969 ...-:-'l;,...,.~;---_- -- ~"''=~-- -. =-.0;::' ;. : - - --, - - ...... _ '-. :;~ - ::-.~~1.:....! ~L !it~n~fu -:_---r=ilr _ _ ~~~. "',-!--: "..7 :.." ~ Givil~El:1gi~eeri~g , !.^." .:.C;,', j' ".;' Site Design~,,-.. _ ~ ,_ " ".i!, Lana~l?laQning' ,~'= ~.:';, <-: ~ ~ tSgry,eYingl.:' ,;-<,=_ '~ .~ o. "., '" "=-~_ ''''''''-<~~I.J . "L--; "l -- _ _~~~";><~J.~' "'''''-'''''-='''''l''''''~~~. _ ~-....,.,r""<._~~, ~ _ ~ Page 1 of2 Conn, Angelina V '~'~~~'~~""'""'~~~""~".''''"''''~'c~'~~';'~'''_o_.-..,~~.,"".",-,---o'_~'~"~~_~...._____X~<,_ From: Sent: To: Duncan, Gary R Friday, August 01, 2008 10: 15 AM 'Richard Hoover' Cc: Conn, Angelina V; mcook@woodmclaw.com; Dave Griffee; Bob McGill; hbstout318@yahoo.com; Redden, Nick; McBride, Mike T Subject: RE: Stout Project Attachments: FORM - Warranty Deed 01 0407.DOC; 2006 Curbing Policy.doc; 2005 Paving Policy.doc; 2005 Cover and Backfill Policy 090806.doc; Minimum Flood Protection Grades.doc Items 1, 2, 3,4,7 please find attached. We are still reviewing Items 5 and 6. Plea'se COntact Nick Redden with our office to obtain the details listed under Item 8. As it relates to the future roadway to the northeast, we are also reviewing access from this future roadway into the site as it relates to the planned northernmost access from Old Meridian. As we discussed, it is likely that we would accept a commitment that the northernmost Old Meridian cut be aQandoned at such time as the access is provided from the future roadway. As it relates to the pond setback, if the 1 DO-year elevation or the top of bank of the proposed pond is less than 50-feet from the future right-of-way (based on the final alignment of the roadway) the City will require the 'property owner to install a barrier or guardrail adjacent to the existing pond. This should be formalized in a commitment also. As we discussed, compliance with the Thoroughfare Plan requires construction of half of the improvements stipulated by the Plan across each frontage. Considering construction of just the improvements indicated on the Thoroughfare Plan, this equates to approximately $130/lf of frontage. This includes the construction of the .asphalt path. Since path will be installed with this project, this would satisfy that portion of the requirement. By our numbers, the resulting outstanding commitment would equal approximately $1 09/lf of frontage provided that the path is constructed by the developer. Gary '''"~,~''''_',~..n_~'~''_''"',,..''O._'~N'~''''''~~~__~_ ~--..",.'~n~,_",,,,..,,_,,.._~,^~,,..,,u,~_,~..__.,_._,_,.,. From: Richard Hoover [mailto:rhoover@Civil-Designs.com] Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 1:01 PM To: Duncan, Gary R Cc: Conn, Angelina V; mcook@woodmclaw.com; Dave Griffee; Bob McGill; hbstout318@yahoo.com Subject: Stout Project Gary, Thanks for meeting with us last Friday. I found the meeting very helpful and informative. I also received a subsequent email from Angie, a portion of whi ch I have copied herein. "I confirmed with Mike H. that you will not need additional variances regarding the adopted Old Meridian District master plan; the plan I submitted to you today only applies to properties zoned mixed medical in that area. As long as the street that runs along the north and west (she means east) side of your side is constructed in the future by you or whomever, then it is not an issue. However, you probably will have to work with the engineering dept and the board of works on any approvals/variances required from them, for the proximity of the retention pond to the proposed street east of your site, curb cut locations, and so on.. ." We were delighted thdt additional variances will not be required through BZA; however, it does appear that she's placed the ball directly in your court regarding the future improvements and their affect upon our site. If you 8/4/2008 Page 1 of2 Richard Hoover From: Sent: To: Duncan, Gary R [gduncan@carmel.in.gov] Friday, August 01, 2008 10: 15 AM Richard Hoover Cc: Conn, Angelina V; mcook@woodmclaw.com; Dave Griffee; Bob McGill; hbstout318@yahoo.com; Redden, Nick; McBride, Mike T SUbject: RE: Stout Project Items 1, 2, 3, 4,7 please find attached. We are still reviewing Items 5 and 6. Please contact Nick Redden with our office to obtain the details listed under Item 8. As it relates to the future roadway to the northeast, we are also reviewing access from this future roadway into the site as it relates to the planned northernmost access from Old Meridian. As we discussed, it is likely that we would accept a commitment that the northernmost Old Meridian cut be abandoned at such time as the access is provided from the future roadway. As it relates to the pond setback, if the 1 OO-year elevation or the top of bank of the proposed pond is less than 50-feet from the future right-of-way (based on the final alignment of the roadway) the City will require the property owner to install a barrier or guardrail adjacent to the existing pond. This should be formalized in a commitment also. As we discussed, compliance with the Thoroughfare Plan requires construction of half of the improvements stipulated by the Plan across each frontage. Considering construction of just the improvements indicated on the Thoroughfare Plan, this equates to approximately $130/lf of frontage, This includes the construction of the asphalt path. Since path will be installed with this project, this would satisfy that portion of the requirement. By our numbers, the resulting outstanding commitment would equal approximately $1 oe/lf of frontage provided that the path is constructed by the developer. Gary From: Richard Hoover [mailto:rhoover@Civil-Designs.com] Sent: MondaYI July 28, 2008 1 :01 PM To: Duncan, Gary R Cc: Conn, Angelina V; mcook@woodmclaw.com; Dave Griffee; Bob McGill; hbstout318@yahoo.com Subject: Stout Project Gory. Thanks for meeting with us lost Friday. I found the meeting very helpful and informative. I also received a subsequent email from Angie, a portion of which I have copied herein. "I confirmed with Mike H. that you will not need additional variances regarding the adopted Old Meridian District master plan; the plan I submitted to you today only applies to properties zoned mixed medical in that area, As long as the street that runs along the north and west (she means east) side of your side is constructed in the future by you or whomever; then it is not an issue. However, you probably will have to work with the engineering dept and the board of works on any approvals/variances required from them, for the proximity of the retention pond to the proposed street east of your site, curb cut locations, and so on,.. " We were delighted that additional variances will not be required through BZA; however, it does appear that 8/512008 Page 2 of2 she's placed the ball directly in your court regarding the future improvements and their affect upon our site. If you would, please let us know what formal variances we need from the BPW and/or Engineering Department to accommodate our proposed improvements and what time-frame we're looking at to accomplish these. Per our meeting this past Friday, please provide us with the following information The information is listed per your comment letter dated June 27, 2008. 1. Comment 24 - Right-af-Way Dedication Documents 2. Comment 39. a. - Language of the new curbing policy that needs to be added to a specification sheet 3. Comment 39. d. - Language af the new paving policy that needs to be added to a specification sheet 4. Comment 39. f. - Standard notes/language for utility backfill within the right-af-way; additionally, please specify how we are to change Note 9 on Sheet 2 unless the information you are providing makes that clear. 5. Comment 43. k. - Please verify jf Mike has approved the southernmost access point on Old Meridian 6. Comment 44. d, - Please verify the adequacy of the proposed storm sewer outfall 7. Comment 44. h. - Please provide the official definitions of MLAG and MFPG for inclUSion on the plans 8. Various Comments - Please indicate the location of the various standard details you are requiring uS to use on the city's website. The include but are not limited to: a. Curb details b. Pavement details c. Handicap ramp details. d. Pavement repair details e. Backfill standards f. Pavement sections Thanks again for the input and assistance. We have a much beeter understanding of what we need to do, and you should expect a revised set of plans with response letters either this Friday or next Monday. Dik Dj! Hoover Civil Def'.>iqn5", LLP 24-1'5 Direcforf'.> Row, 5ulfe E IndianofXJli5, Indiana 46241 Te:I 5/7-21-4--1968 Fax 5/7-24-4--1969 Cell 5/1-44/-8082 8/5/2008 Ii':r . fi c:~ 01- L <<t , Civil Designs July 30, 2008 Gary R. Duncan Assistant City Engineer Department of Engineering One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 RE: . Sto.ut Shoes Old Meridian and Main-Project Review #1 , ;fi> 0]')~:: 'r".\ :c Da :";~ k~ .. If't/:t .... r-i . :<;:. ~- '-'t) '~ \. ~q}};""_: ~y '\;c \ ';r '-!;!:/,1 \" ~} 1~1 ~ ,~}\,; ~-~ . Dear Mr. Duncan: Reference is made to your cotnment letter dated June 27, 2008, regarding the above mentioned project. A copy of th'iS letter is attached. Civil Designs, LLP has reviewed your comments and have addressed them as follows: I. Plan Review Comments 1. "These comments' represent the Department 'of Engineering's first review of the civil construction plans for this project. " Comment Noted. 2. 'We request that all responses to our future comments be provided in writing and be accomplished by drawings reflecting the requested revisions. Failure to provide written responses may result in the delay of the review process. " Comment Noted. 3. "It is critical that this office be made aware of all modifications made on the plans being resubmitted, parlicularfy if any.such changes are considered "new" or faJ/ outside of our previous reviews. Please notify us of any changes and specifically state any changes, including changes resulting for Plan Commission, BZA or other committee meetings. " Comment Noted. 4. "We haye .engaged Crossroad Engineers, PC to review all drainage plans and drainage calculations submitted to this office for review. " Comment Noted. 5. "Final drawings will not be approved for construction until: a. All Engineering Department and Utility Department and Hamilton County Swveyor issues have been resolved. 2415 Directors Row, Suite E Indianapolis, IN 46241 www.civil-designs.com P 317.244.1968 f 317.244.1969 '>.--,il"-;:"'l'~"""-' "A-~. -"'.'" ',,,.~< '~ .~!;,-.--' .~.~': ,.~ _; ,,' '-"~:,'::. ;c.....""'i....~..;-. -~".!W ,'.'i'#_~__..:.." ,~.'J\l. ~~'.- T. ': '.." , '-"':r'!',,~...:Ei'lilEn iReerin' -"!" - ~- -"-.__.8Itel[)esl n ; "'.?>- ,",,',,'.land,Rlam:lln. -=- -:,,: ..,..".,:- '~ur,l{e In _'"",~- 'i' ~. b. All bonds and petformance guarantees are posted. C. All Board of Public Works and Safety approvals and any other governing agency approvals (it required) are obtained. d. All off-site easements necessary to install utilities to serve the development are secured. e. Any required fees are paid in full. 'f. Required digital tiles have been submitted. " Comment Noted. 6-. "The' Department reserves the _ right to provide additional comments based upon subsequent reviews as more detailed information is submitted.1J Comment Noted. 7. '~n approved Storm Water Management Permit is required prior to commencing any earth disturbing activity." .Anote has been added to the plan set. 8. ''l\n approved right-at-Way permit is required prior to commencing any work in the public right-at-way. " A note has been added to the plan set. 9. "If it wi/l.be.necessary to relocate existing utilities or otherintrastructure, the costs for such relocations are to be _ borne solely by the developer. Any utility poles required to be relocated within the right-of-way shall be relocated to within one foot of the proposed right- - of-way." A note has. been added to the plan set. 1 O. ':As previously indicated, compliance with the Thoroughfare Plan includes construction of the 'improvements prescribed by the Thoroughfare Plan (and in this case, construction ot some portion of the roundabout) as well as dedication of that additional right-of-way outside of the existing right-of;...way to meet the half right-at-way width prescribed by the . Thoroughfare Plan across the frontage controlled by the development (including sections with no access). Typically, developers provide a commitment equal to the value to construct these improvements for deposit into the City's non-reverting thoroughfare fund. The total financial commitment is reduced by the value of the required improvements physicaJJy installed by the Developer. The tact that the City recently improved the frontage does not provide relieftrom this requirement. JJ' . . Comment Noted. 11. "The Department requires that the construction drawings be developed in accordance with the City of Carmel digital submission standards and that all required submittals for primary plat, secondary plat,and construction drawings be made. The digital files must be 'ir' submitted to the Department of Engineers prior to the approval of the construction plans. Please contact the City GIS Department for the requirements. " Comment Noted 12. "Jurisdictions: a. The project site is located within current City of Carmel Corporate Limits. b. Streets and Right of Way - City of Carmel (Old Meridian Street, Main Street). c. Water - City of Carmel Utilities. d. Sanitary Sewers - City of Carmel Utilities. e. Storm Sewers/Drainage - City of Carmel. f. Legal Drains - Hamilton County Surveyor's Office". Comment Noted. 13. "Drawings submitted for approval: a. The design engineer must certify all drawings submitted for final approval. b. This office wi/I require a minimum of 9-sets of drawings forapproval after all issues have been resolved. The cJrawings wI1l be stamped as approved and . signed by the City Engineer and by Carmel Utilities. The Owner will receive 3-approved sets, 1 of which must be maintained on the construction site at al/ times. " Comme'nt Noted. 14. "Carmel Utilities will provide separate reviews of this project for water and sanitary sewer issues. Please assure that copies of all drawings and revisions are sent to: Paul Pace . Paul Arnone Carmel Utilities Distribution Carmel Utilities Collection 3450 West 131st Street . 901 North Range/ine Road Westfield. IN 46074 . Carmel, IN 46032 Failure to do so may result in the delay of final approva/of the construction plans . and the project.1J Comment Noted. 15. "Carmel Utilities does subscribe to 'Hofey Moley' who should be contacted directly for all water main locations. " Comment Noted. 16. "Digital versions of the fo((owing information are available upon request. Please share these requirements with the developer and future contractors associated with the project: a. Project Approval Checklist . '"1- i' b. Performance/Maintenance Guarantee Requirements c. Performance/Maintenance Guarantee Release Procedure d. Engineering requirements for Building Permit Approval e. Commercials Permitting Procedures f. Utility Jurisdictions/Right of Way Permit g. ' Water and Sanitary Sewer Fees." _ Comment Noted. BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS AND SAFETY 17. "I am enclosing a schedule for Board of Public Works and Safety meeting dates and agenda deadlines for your use. Please use the Engineering Department deadlines for submissions to the Board. " Comment Noted. :18. "Any submission to the board requires prior approval by the ,Carmel City Plan ,Commission and/or the Board of Zoning Appeals (if applicable) and completion of review by the Technical Advisory Committee. All written requests to be placed on the Board's agenda must include the appropriate Docket Number and the date (or dates) of approval by the Plan ,Commission anc/Jor the Board of Zoning Appeals (if applicable). II Comment 'Noted. 19. "Water and Sewer Availability (EDU) approval from the Board is based upon the usage of the proposed buildings within the development. Reference items #34 through #37 below for a more detailed explanation. If an irrigation system is planned tor this development, approval for additional Water Availability must be obtained from the Board." Comment Noted. '20. "Commercial Curb Cut Approval- Demolition of 4-existing curb cuts and constructionet 3- new curb cuts will require Board approval. " ' Comment Noted. 21. "Temporary Construction Entrance - Since this will be at the location of a permanent curb cut for this development separate Board approval is not required. " Comment Noted. 22. "The installation of any permanent, privately owned and/or maintained improvement (signs, decorative street signs, walls, streetlights, etc.) within dedicated right of way or dedicated easements requires the execution of a Consent to Encroach Agreement between the Owner and the City of Carmel. Such agreements are executed by the Board of Public ,,~ Works and Safety. The City Engineer, representing the Board, may approve irdgation system agreements." Comment Noted. 23. "Secondary Plat approval if applicable. All performance guarantees must be. posted prior to submission of secondary plats for Board of Public Works and Safety approval. /I Comment Noted. 24. "Dedication of Right of way if applicable. Appropriate r.lw dedication documents are available upon request. " Comment Noted. 25. '~ny open pavement cuts of Old Meridian Street or Main Street will require Board approval. Please indicate saw cut pavement removal if appt;cable~ Open pavement street cuts shall be restored in accordance With the City's standard Street Cut Patch detail. This detail must. be added to the plans. " Comment Noted. 26. "Closure otthe existing path on Old Meridian Street will require approval from the Board.". Comment Notad. BONDING REQUIREMENTS 27~ "Upon initial review, it appears Performance Guarantees shaff be provided for the fo/{owing; a. Right of way Improvements (including demolition, curbs, pavement,asphalt path/sidewalks, ADA ramps, etc). b. Erosion and Sediment Control and Storm Water Quality. Please contact Amanda Foley, Engineering Department Stormwater Administrator, for .details regarding engineer's estimates/performance -guarantee requirements for these items. .. 10 It does not appear that Performance Guarantees will be required . for either Water Mains or Sanitary Sewers. It is assumed that the Sanitary Sewer main and manholes indicated on the Utility Sheet are existing infrastructure. However, please contact Carmel Utilities for final determinati9n of bonding requirements.. The Storm Sewer system appears to be a private system and as such, will not require bonding." Comment Noted. 28. "The amount of the Performance Guarantee is based upon a certified Engineer's Estimate for 1 00% of the cost of labor and materials to construct the individual improvements, to be provided by the design engineer. Please provide detailed Engineer's Estimates for each improvement including quantities, unit costs, pipe sizes and materials, etc." Comment Noted. .. .. .29. "Upon completion and release of individual Performance Guarantees,athree~year Maintenance Guarantee will be required. The Maintenance Guarantee will be required. The Maintenance Guarantee amount is based upon 15% of the Petformance amount for Streets and Curbs and 10% of the Performance amount for all other improvements. " Comment Noted. 30. "Performance Guarantees may be Performance or Subdivision Bonds or Irrevocable Letters of Credit. " .. Comment Noted. 31 . "Please reference the available enclosures for more detailed explanation of our procedures. " . Comment Noted. RIGHT OF WA Y PERMIT AND BONDING 32. "Any work in the dedicated right of way of Old Meridian Street and/or Main Street will require an approved Right of Way Permit and a License & Permit Bond. " A note has been added to the Plan Set. 33. "The bond amount is determined by the number of instances of work in the right of way. at $2,000. ao per instance. However, if the work is included in the scope of work of a required and posted Petformance Guarantee, the Petformance, Guarantee may be used to, satisfy the bond requirements of the Right of Way Permit." Comment Noted. 34. "Please contact our Right of Way Manager, Fred Glaser, to arrange right of way permitting and bonding, " Comment Noted, A VAILABILlTY AND CONNECTION FEES 35. "New water related fees have been authorized effective July 2, 2007. The revisions ,are: a. Tap Inspection Fee-A $86.00/1.0 EDU tap inspection fee shaff be, charged for each new user witllin Carmel's water system. The current Water Connection Fee is $1,310.DO/EDU. This has not been revised. Thus $1,310.00 Water Connection Fee/1.0 EDU plus Water Inspection Fee of &86.00/1.0 EDU = $1,396,aO/1.0 EDU Total. b. Development Application Review Fee-This fee will be assessed at the time the Water and Sanitary Sewer Connection Fees are paid. The review fee is $150.00 for single commercial, business and residential customers requiring a water connection and $300.00 for developments with more than one customer requiring a water connection. The latter fee of $300.00 would be appficableto this project." Comment Noted. " 0: 36. "Sanitary Sewer Availability (acreage) and. Connection Fees and Water Availability (acreage) Fees have not been changed and remain at $1,36S.00/acre, $79S.00IEDU and $1,010,00/acre respectively." Comment Noted. 37. "Fees applicable to this project: a. Availability (acreage) Fees will not be assessed. b. Connection Fees will be based upon the proposed.use oithe f'Nobuildings. Please provide a listing of the proposed use accompanied by appropriate supporting data such as square feet office, square feet retail, restaurant seats, etc. Upon receipt, appropriate fees will be calculated and provided, " Comment Noted. 38. "If an irrigation system ;s planned for this development, additional Water AvailabtlityFees....... and Water Connection Fe'es will be assessed based upon the size and usage of the system and upon the recommendations of the. Director of Carmel Utilities. " Comment Noted. CONSTRUCTION PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS 39. "General Comments a. The City has adopted a new curbing policy. All new curbing installed by this project shall conform to this policy. Please revise any notes, specifications, and details to accommodate this policy. The language of this policy must be added to a specification sheet of the final construction plans. The plans have been revised; see Sheet C7.10 for reference. b. This project is subject to the City's Storm Water Management and. Storm Water Quality Ordinances. A minimum ot 2 BMP's in series shall be provided to treat a/l storm water runoff leaving the site. The plans have been revised; See Sheet C3.0 for reference. . . c. All sheets shall be stamped 'Approval pending-notfor construction'. The plans have been revised; see all sheets .for reference. d. The -City has adopted a new paving policy. All paving in the right-of-way shall conform to this policy. Please revise any notes, specifications, and details to accommodate this policy. The language of this policy must be added to a specification sheet on the final construction plans. . The plans have been revised; see Sheet C7.1 for reference. e. Please provide maintenance of traffic plan for all work in the right-at-way. Such plans shall conform to the INDOT Work Zone Safety Manual. The plans have been revised; see Sheet C6.0 for reference. .. a f. The portions of anyutifity installations ,or relocations within the right-of-way shall be backfilled in accordance with this Departments standard and shaff satisfy the minimum cover requirements. These notes need to be added to the plans. Please contact this office to obtain the standard notes/language. Please also revise Note 9 on Sheet C2. O. The plans have been revised; see Sheet C2.0 for reference. g. Please add a note to each sheet that no earth disturbing activity may take place without an approved storm water management permit. The plans have been revised; see ,all sheets for reference. h. Please add a note to the drawings as follows: 'All paving within the existing and proposed City right-of-way shaff conform to the requirements of the Department at Engineering, The Contractor shall contact the Department of Engineering to schedule a pre-construction meeting to review the . Department's construction requirements, staff notification requirements, required inspections tor certain stages of the work and to review the authority of the Department as it relates to work within the existing and proposed City right-at-way.' . The plans have been revised; see Sheet CO.O for reference. i. . Please verify that all existing easement on-site are indicated on the plans. Comment noted. all known easements are shown on sheet C1.0. j. Please verify that all known above and below grade utilities and all known drainage infrastructure (including bridges, culverts and any other drainage structures) are indicated on the plans. Top casting elevations shall be noted. . All gravity systems shall include information as to pipe size, invert elevations and direction of flow. Comment noted, all known utilities are shown on sheet C1.0. k. Please' add a note to the plans that there shall be no frames or castings located within or under pavement, curb, walk or path within the proposed right-of-way. Curb inlet frames are expected from this requirement. The plans have been revised; see Sheet C2.0 for reference. \. City standard.sub-surface drain is required under all curbing in the proposed right-of-way. " 40. "Cover Sheet The plans have been revised; see Sheet. C2.0 for reference. a. Please remove Sheet C8.0, Landscape Plan, and Sheet CB2255, Lighting Plan from the Index. Also, remove these sheets from future plans submitted ..' Q for review and approval by the Engineering Department. We do not have approval authority over these items. " The plans have been revised.; see Sheet CO.O for reference. 41. "Sheet C1.0 a. Does the Topographic Survey reflect current property ownership? It appears that demolition and construction will occur on what appears to be property owned by Thomas W Mullins & Julie K. Zuge/der. The drawings also indicate additional Old Meridian 'Street and Main Street right of way dedication, not on/yon the Stout property but also on the Mullins and Zuge/der parcel. .Has Stout Shoes purchased the properly?'" The entire site is owned by Stout Shows. 42. "Sheet C1.1 a. Why are two phases of demolition indicated? Two phases are proposed to keep the existing store open until the south building is completed. b. Is the pipe under the first drive on Old Meridian Street to be demolished with the drive? Yes, the pipe will be removed and the plans have been updated. C. All curb removal notes shall be revised to require sawcut at the nearest existing joint past the limits of removal. A note has been added to the plans; see Sheet C2.0 for reference. d. All pavement removal notes and path removal notes shall include the requirements to sawcut the payement to remain to a clean. edge aUhe limits of the removal. T~e plans have been revised; see Sheet C2.D for reference. e. The existing curb cut onto Main Street crosest to Old Meridian Street shall be removed as alternate access is being provided. Comment noted. f.' Patching of the mainline pavement being removed for the instal/ation of the new entrances shall be in accordance with the City's Street Cut patch detail Comment noted. g, Please indicate that the portions of the existing driveways to be demolished within the proposed right-of-way shall be removed in accordance with City Code Section 6-227 (h) (10). This shall apply to the three driv~s on Old Meridian Street and the two drives on Main Street). " ... r::r The plans have been revised; see Sheet C1.1- for reference. 43. "Sheet C2.0 a. The existing path and ADA ramps along Old Meridian Street shaff be removed and replaced with a 10-toot asphalt path by this project. The path shalf be located 1-toot off ot the proposed right-ot-way or immediately adjacent to the right-ot;.way if there will be adjacent walk/patio on-site that I abuts the proposed right-ot-way. Th~ plans have been revised; see Sheet C2.0 for reference. b. Please add Keynote G for City standard ADA ramps in the right-at-way to the legend and add this keynote to the plan view for all instances where the new path crosses the proposed drive cuts and such a ramp is required. The plans have been revised; see Sheet C2.0 for reference. c. The City standard for commercial curb .cuts includes a minimum 30-foot return radius. The plans have been revised; see Sheet C2.0 for reference. d. Please make the proposed right-ot-way darker and more apparent on the plan sheets. The plans have been revised; .see Sheet C2;O for reference. e. Are any on-site easements planned? Yes, sanitary and storm easements have been added; see Sheet C2.0 for reference. f. Are the proposed curb cuts onto Old Meridian Street consistent with the Old Meridian Task Force Report? Comment noted. g. Please iudicate depressed curb across each of the proposed entrances. The plans' have been revised; see Sheet C2.0 for reference. h. Please verity that the start ot the new curbing on Main Street is the end ot the new pavement installed with the Old Meridian Street project. A site visit and pictur'es verified that it is the.end of new pavement. i. _ Please contirm with the DOCS ifbicycle parking is required. Comment noted. j. Please verify with the DOCS ifthe Old Meridian Task Force Report indicates a loop road to the northeast and if this project needs to dedicate right-at-way for such a roadway and if this plan needs to accommodate this roadway as it ... 'C relates to access (future access will be provided to this site from this roadway and not via a cut onto Old Meridian Street as presently proposed). Comment noted. k. Although previously indicated that the Department would only support one curb cut from Old Meridian Street, the Department is reviewing the proposed southernmost access from Old Meridian Street Comment noted. I. If the sanitary sewer main instal/ation will. be open cut method, please indicate the street cut and repair on both this sheet and the demolition sheet. The sanitary will be bored under the road. m. As previously indicated, please indicate full width milling and resurfacing of Main Street from the limits of the Old Meridi?n Street project to the eastern property line. A note shaff be added to the Plans that this work shall not be completed l!ntil the sanitary sewer instalfaUon is complete. JJ The plans have been revised; see Sheet C2.0 for reference. 44. "Sheet C3.0 a. Please indicate the overflow route of the proposed pond. The plans have been revised; see Sheet C3.0 for reference. b. The pond does not appear to provide the requisite freeboard between the 1 DO-year elevation and the top of bank. Additional information has been added to the plans; see SheetC3.0 for reference. C. How wiJ/ drainage in the Main Street right-of-way be maintained? The existing pipe and inlet out of the curb inlet structure in the street are indicated for removal to facilitate the installation of the detention system outfall. . A beehive inlet is proposed to accommodate the right-of-way. See Sheet C3.0 for reference. d. The Department is reviewing the adequacy of the proposed storm sewer outfall. Comment noted. e. Please include the summary drainage information required by Section 100 of the Storm Water Technical Standards Manual. The information is provided in the attached drainage report. f. Please verify that the detention facility provides volume to detain the fully developed right-ot-way across each frontage. ,~ '0 Additional Computations have been performed; see the attached drainage report for reference. g. The pond may be located within 50-reet of the right-or-way if a loop road to the northeast is indicated on the Old Meridian Task Force Report. Comment noted. h. Please establish MLAG and MFPG elevations and include the definitions of each on the plans. Please contact this office to obtain the definitions. The plans have been revised; see Sheet C3.0 for reference. i The finished floor elevations of the proposed buildings shall accommodate future on-street parking the satneas if such parking already existed. The department would expect a 2-percent slope from the door sills out to the future top back of curb of the parking areas. " Comment noted. 45. "Sheet C5.0 8. BPW approval and a maintenance of traffic plan are required for the sanitary main installation under Main Street if by open cut method. The sanitary will be bored under Main Street. b. Has the existing piping system in the Main Street right-of""way been analyzed for the proposed detention facility outflow? This system may be considered a downstream restriction requiring additional on-site detention since the function of this inlet and piping system to serve the existing watershed draining to the system cannot be impaired by the detention facility outflow." Comment noted. 46. "Sheet C7.0 a. Please revise Detail 03/C7.0 to be concrete. City standard requires commercial curb cuts to be concrete within the limits of the right-of-way. The pavement section shall be 6-inch minimum or that section considered adc;Jquate for the largest vehicle expected to regularly access the site. Comment noted. b. Please add a detail for the City standard multi-use path pavement section. This detail shall include a note that all paving shaff be completed in the same season. The plans have been revised; see Sheet C7.1 for reference. C. Please add the City standard depressed curb detail. The plans have been revised; see Sheet C7.0 for reference. d. Please replace Details 05/C7.0 and 06/C7. 0 with the City's standard details. "'" - "'C:. The plans have been revised; see Sheet C7.0 for reference. e. Please add the City's standard detail for detail E604-SWCR-02 for ADA ramps in the proposed right-of-way. The plans have been revised; see Sheet C7.0 for reference. f. Please ensure that the curb portion of Detail' 061C7.0 meets the City's dimensional standards for straight curb. " The plans have been revised; See Sheet C7.0 for reference. 47. "Sheet C7.1 a. Please include the City's Street Cut Patch Detail: The plans have been revised; see Sheet C7.1 for referen.ce. . b. Detail 05lC7.1. A City standard detail for this.installation shall be included for any such installations within the proposed right-of~way. The plans have been revised; see Sheet C7.2 for reference. c. Please add the pty standard detail for reinforced pipe for any storm piping installation within the proposed right-at-way. The plans have been revised; see Sheet C7.2 for reference. d. Please revise Detail OBIC7. 1 to. include Engineering cover and final backfill standards for installation in the right-of-way. " The plans have been revised; see Sheet C7.2 for reference. . If you should have any other questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to call me. Very truly yours, Civil Designs, LLP ~I~ Conn. Angelina V From: Sent: To: Cc: Conn, Angelina V Friday, July 25,200811 :10 AM Richard Hoover mcook@woodmclaw.com; hbstout318@yahoo.com; Bob McGill; Duncan, Gary R; Brewer, Scott I; Holmes, Christine B RE: Meeting - Stout Project Subject: Hi Dik- thanks for the productive meeting this morning. I confirmed with Mike H. that you will not need additional ~ariances regarding the adopted Old Meridian District master plan; the plan I submitted to you today only applies to properties zoned mixed medical in that area. As long as the street that runs along the north and west side of your side is constructed in the future by you or whomever, then it is not an issue. However; you probably will have to work with the engineering dept and the board of works on any approvals/variances required from them, for the proximity of the retention pond to the proposed street east of your site, curb cut locations, and so on. . . We also .discussed SOme ways to provide street trees, such as bump outs between some of the on street parking spacing, tree-wells, etc. We would like to see your revisions on that_ The landscape plan will ultimately be reviewed/approved by Scott Brewer, and so you will have to work with him on his comment about the conflict of planting areas and easements. He will be out until august 4, though. Several pending review comments from planning/zoning are below: Comment 13- please provide an aerial photo with a site overlay. Comment 22- on the new plans, it is still hard to see the sidewalk/path extending up to the north property line, north of the northern driveway. Comment 28 - a revised lighting plan was never submitted showing street lighting along old meridian, per the adopted city style. Comments 30 & 31 - foot-candle measurements on the lighting plap cannot exceed 0.5 at the property lines; your lighting plan does not show foot-candle limits at the property lines. Does this mean the foot-candle measurement is zero? Comment 40- provide an update on the city forester's requirement of a tree inventory and/or a tree preservation plan. That's all I have for now. Have a great weekend! Angie Conn, Planning Administrator Dept. of Community Services - Planning & Zoning 1 civic Square, 3-rd Floor City of Carmel, IN 46032 p. 317-571-2417 f. 317-571-2426 aconn@carmel.in.gov -----Original Message----- From; Duncan, Gary R Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9;02 PM To; ~onn, Angelina V; Richard Hoover; Duncan, Gary R Cc: mcook@woodmclaw.com; Littlejohn, David Wi hbstout318@yahoo.com; Bob McGill Subject; RE: Meeting ~ Stout Project That is it then. Angie, would you see if the DOCS conference is available? -----Original Message----- From: "Conn, Angelina V" <Aconn@carmel.in.gov> To: "-Richard Hoover" <rhoover@Civil~Designs.com>; "Duncan, Gary R" <gduncan@carmel.in.gov> Cc: "rncook@woodmclaw.com" <mcook@woodmclaw.com>i "Littlejohn, David W" 1 JAMES BHAINARD, l\iLAY()J~ July 21, 2008 Mr. Richard R. Hoover, PE Civil Designs 241S'Directors Row, Suite E Indianapolis, fN 4624T RE: Stout shoes, Old Meridian and Main.Project Review #2 Dear Mr. Hoover: On May 29,2008, the City received your construction plans,.submitted for the July 16,2008 Technical Advisory Committee meeting. The Department ofEngil1ceringprovidedrevie\v comments in a letter dated June 27, 2008 and we are currently awaiting responses to those comments. ][you have questions, please Contact me at S71-2441. ."\ 7inC rely, . /' \ '1' . ) ../._..........p7f. /-...." .'. .' ....1 ,( rj,! 1,\;1., I, ;) '., . . i d..l { "J I {.' /11'4I! ( . /)wvt/~"I", ~ Duncan,lLL-e..E. V \ /-"-...... Assistant qity Engineer \ i Departme~t of Engineeriilg \1 CC (via emaiJ): Angelina Con'n" Department of Community Services John Duffy; GannelUtilities Paul Pace, Caimel Utilities Distribution Paul Arnone. Carmel Utilities Coilection Greg llkQ, Crossroad Engineers;,PC Les Olds, Director of Redevelopment Department Review CC: File Copy \\Apps2\uscr data\cng\shared\DJ-tiJIIPROJREY08\STClUTSHOESOLDMERIDlAN2. doc DEI'AIHMI;NT OF E;>iCiNEFllING ONE CIVIC SQUM(I~, CARMEL, IN 460,:;2 O1'FIU, 317.571.244] FAX 31757.1.2439 E~lj\J L engi 11_~cr j"ng@(;lnnetin.go, I,~D WOODEN & McLAUGHLIN LLP Attorneys At Law Michael C. Cook. Esq mcuok@}voodmclaw.coln VIA ELECTRONIC AND REGULAR U.S. MAlL Ms. Angelina Conn P lanningAdministrator City of Carmel One Civic Square Carmel, Indiana 46032 RE: Stout Sboes Buildings (Docket No. 08050033 DP/ADLS) Dear Angie: The following is in response to your letter dated May 28, 2008, with reference made to the numbered items contained therein; 1. A Development Plan Application was submitted on June 20, 2008. 2. A Findings of Fact sheet was included in the final information packet provided to your office on July 2, 2008. 3. The proof of notice was submitted to your office on July 8, 2008. 4. The notarized affidavit of notice of public hearing was submitted to your office on July 8, 2008 5. The filled out Notice of Public Hearing page oftlle application was submitted to your office on July 8, 2008. 6. The Public Notice Sign Placement affidavit was submitted to your office on July 8,2008. 7. The Official List of Adjacent Property OVv'ners from the Hamilton County Auditor's Office was provided to your office on July 8, 2008. 211 North Pennsylvania One Indiana Square, SUIte I KilO, Indianapolis. IN 46204-4208 Phonc:(317) 639-6151 Fax: (317) 639-6444 www.woodl1lclaw.com WOODEN & McLAUGHLIN LU Ms. Angelina Corm Page 2 8. The petitioner now owns the southern most parcel. Therefore, the consent of the owner of the southem most parcel is no longer relevant. 9. Please find enclosed the conunent letters from the T AC members recei ved as ofJuly 11,2008. The TAC meeting is scheduled for July 16,2008 upon which date we presume we may receive comments and/or letters from the remaining TAC memhers who have not provided comment thus far. 10. We provided your office with digital copies of the site plan and building elevations on June 20, 2008. 11. An aerial with the site overlay will be forthcoming. 12. We may provide material/color samples (to the extent available) at the Plan Commission meeting and/or Special Studies subcommittee meeting. 13. The location of the trash dumpster is shown on the site plan. The location of the tmck turnaround area is evident from the configuration and the depiction of the paved areas and parking areas as noted on the site plan. 14. The location of the proposed utility mains and storm sewer pipes with proposed easements have been added and labeled accordingly, as shown on the enclosed Sheet C8.0, Landscape Plan. There are no existing easements that affect the project. Therefore only proposed easeni.ents have been shown and labeled on the site plan. 15. The planting detail is shown on the landscape plan provided to your office on July 2,2008. 1 G. Plantings along the SOUd1 property line are shown on the landscape plan provided to your offi.ce on July 2,2008. 17. The landscape plan incorporates the guidelines set forth in Chapter 20G.OS.04.F.3, for establishing a screen between the parking area and Old Meridian Street. 18. A soils map will be shown on Sheet C4.2, Erosion Control Notes; a floodplain note based on FEMA mapping will be added to Sheet Cl.O, Topographic Survey and Sheet C3.0, Grading Plan. For your reference, a copy of the portion of the FEMA map and the wording of the floodplain notation has been included herein for your use. 19. The lot cover percentage with pavement and building footprint factored in is 72.99%. WOODEN & McLAUGHLIN UP Ms. Angelina Conn Page 3 20. A drainage report will be provided once the City Engineer's Office has completed its review and detennined the allowable release rate from the contemplated outlet. Please see comment 44d from the comment letter provided by the City of Carmel, Department of Engineering, attached herein. 21. The elevation plans currently depict an example of proposed tenant signage on the building fayade. The color, design, dimensions and sign material will be finalized and submitted for approval at a later date after the final architectural design has been approved by the Plan Commission and in accordance with the needs of future tenants. 22. The site plan (please see attached Sheet C2.0, revised July 14,2008) now shows the requested improvements. This plan is submitted for purposes of the informal Plan Commission meeting, and a set of revised plans for the entire site will be submitted once this proj ect has been to T AC on J uJy 16th. 23. A lighting plan was submitted to your office on July 2,2008. The lighting plan included the foot-candle detail and specifications. The project will not incorporate any sconce lighting. 24. Please refer to comments 42 a through 42g and comments 43a through 43k of the comment letter provided by the City of Carmel Department of Engineering contained in this submittal which indicate the Department of Engineering is going through the process of verification and acceptance of the proposed drives. 25. It is apparent that the DOCS is requiring on-street parking for this site as a condition of approval. The site plan (please see attached Sheet C2.0, revised July 14, 2008) now shows the requested improvements. This plan is submitted for purposes of the infomlal Plan Commission meeting, and a set of revised plans for the entire site will be submitted once this project has been to TAC on July 16111. 26. The site plan shows and labels the location for concrete sidewalks in front of the building. The sidewalk is not proposed to include pavers. 27. The EIFS top was switched eliminated on the south end of building as shc)\vn on the elevations submitted to your office on July 2,2008. 28. A revised site lighting plan showing the required lighting fixtures with the revised plans addressing T AC comments will be provided following the T AC meeting. 29. We believe the lighting plan and specifications provided to your office on July 2,2008, complies with these requirements. WOODEN & McLAUGHLIN LLP Ms. Angelina Conn Page 4 30. We believe the lighting plan and specifications provided to your office' on July 2, 2008, complies with these requirements. 31. We believe the lighting plan and specifications provided to your office on July 2,2008, complies with these requirements. 32. The building's envelope, HV AC and lighting systems will be designed to maximize energy performance. Roofing and insulation systems will be chosen that w'ill work towards the same end. There will be easily accessible areas that are dedicated to collection and storage of non-hazardous materials for recycling, including paper, con-ugated card board, glass, plastic and metals. Petitioner will recycle and or salvage non-hazardous construction debris. Petitioner will choose materials with recycled content. Petitioner will choose materials and products that are extracted and manufactured \vith in the region to reduce transportation costs. All buildings will be smoke free. There will be ventilation system monitoring to help sustain occupant comfort while maintaining efficiency. There will be a high level oflighting and HV AC system control to help sustain occupant comfort while maintaining efficiency. 33. The parking area will consist of asphalt pavement. 34. Please see the attached revised site plan showing the locations for bicycle parking. 35. All mechanical equipment will be located within the buildings and will not be visible to the public. 36. The building matcrial and thcir colors arc shown and depicted on the drawings and elevations provided to your office on July 2,2008. We will provide samples of the building materials at the final Plan Commission and Special Studies meetings. 37. Enclosed is a copy of the colored dumpster elevations. 38. The dumpster will be shorter in height than the dumpster enclosure to effectively screen the dumpster. 39. We will work with the Department of Engineering to provide the requested details. 40. Few, if any, existing trees will be preserved along the interior of the site due to the natural fall of the site from the north to the south. We believe the landscape plan provides for replacement trees as provided within the ordinances; however, \ve are WOODEN & McLAUGHL1NLLP Ms. Angelina Conn Page 5 awaiting comment from the City's arbOlist on our submittal. Additional revisions may be required base upon those comments forthcoming. 41. We believe the proposed building design complies with this item. 42. A variance from the Board of Zoning Appeals was obtained to address this matter. 43. The awnings will be fabric with aluminum framing beneath. Please contact me if you have any questions or comments regarding this matter. Enclosures cc: Richard Hoover (via email) Bob McGill (via ema!l) Page 1 of2 Brewer, Scott I From: Brewer, Scott I Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 20085:42 PM To: 'rhoover@Civil-Designs.com' Cc: 'MCOOK@woodmclaw.com' Subject: FW: Stout Shoes Dear Richard: I will not be in the TAC Meeting tomorrow, but here are my initial comments Please feel free to contact me about them. Thank you. Scott Brewer, City Forester Environmental Planner, DOCS City of Carmel, One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 PH: 317-571-2478 FAX: 317-571-2426 Urban Forestry is the center of sustainability for municipalities From: Brewer, Scott I Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 5:29 PM To: Conn, Angelina V Subject: Stout Shoes Angie: 1. 20G.05.04 F(3) states that "On-site parking lots or structured parking adjacent to a public street must be separated from the street right-of-way with landscaped strip, no less than six (6) feet wide, containing shade trees, and shrubs or low fence/walls up to four (4) feet high. This plan appears to lack this feature. 2. There are apparent utility conflicts in the parking lot with landscape material. All utility lines and easements (including any drainage.easements) should appear on the landscape plan to eliminate conflicts. 3. Structural soils have been required to fulfill proper rooting volumes for street trees in other locations along Old Meridian Street, these should be engineered and planned for in this instance. The planting area in the right-'of-way including soil volumes should be graphically planned in the set, since the street trees in the ROW are required on the plan. 4. The plan shows several trees being planted below top of bank in the storm water retention area. The County Surveyor's Office will not allow plantings below top of bank, and Carmel City Engineering also discourages it. 5. 20G.04.06 E says that" Sites with existing trees or stands of trees shall protect and incorporate them into the overall site design." Tree Preservation methods must be called outgraphically on the plans and established on the site plan. Any tree preservation information such as a plan or tree inventory should be submitted to the Environmental Planner in the Department of Community Services. Scott Brewer, City Forester Environmental Planner, DOCS City of Carmel, One Civic Square 7/15/2008 1. --""".~ ~ :~~: ~,~~ ~ f RfCElVro JUL I J;1R DOCS WOODEN & McLAUGHLINLLP Attorneys At Law Michael c.. Cook, Esq. mcook@woodmclaw.com VIA ELECTRONIC AND REGULAR U.S. MAIL Ms. Angelina Conn PlanningAdministrator City of Cannel One Civic Square Carmel, Indiana 46032 RE: Stout Shoes Buildings (Docket No. 08050033 DP/ADLS) Dear Angie: The following is in response to your letter dated May 28, 2008, with reference made to the numbered items contained therein; / A Development Plan Application was submitted. on June 20, 2008. 2. A Findings of Fact sheet was included in the final information packet provided to your office on July 2, 2008. /' The proof of notice was submitted to your office on July 8,2008. )'( The notarized affidavit of notice of public hearing was submitted to your office on July 8, 2008 Y The filled out Notice of Public Hearing page ofthe application was submitted to your office on July 8, 2008. /' The Public 'Notice Sign Placement affidavit was submitted to your office on July 8, 2008. I The Official List of Adjacent Property Owners from the Hamilton County Auditor's Office was provided to your office on Ju1y 8, 2008. 21 J North Pennsylvania One Indiana Square, Suite 1800, Indianapolis, IN 46204-4208 PhQne:(317) 639-6151 Fax:(317) 639-6444 www.woodmc1aw.com WOODEN & McLAUGHLINLLP Ms. Angelina Conn Page 2 /' The petitioner now owns the southern most parcel. Therefore, the consent of the owner ofthe southern most parcel is no longer relevant. 9. Please find enclosed the comment letters from the TAC members received as of July 11,2008. The TAC meeting is scheduled for July 16, 2008 upon which date we presume we may receive comments and/or letters from the remaining TAC members who have not provided comment thus far. }ff" We provided your office with digital copies of the site plan and building elevations on June 20,2008. 11. An aerial with the site overlay will be forthcoming. 1/ We may provide material/color samples (to the extent available) at the Plan Commission meeting and/or Special Studies subcommittee meeting. B. The location of the trash dumpster is shown on the site plan. The location of the truck turnaround area is evident from the configuration and the depiction of the paved areas and parking areas as noted on the site plan. Y The location of the proposed utility mains. and storm sewer pipes with proposed easements have been added and labeled accordingly, as shown on the enclosed Sheet C8.0, Landscape Plan. There are no existing easements that affect the project. Therefore only proposed easements have been shown and labeled on the site plan. % The planting detail is shown on the landscape plan provided to your office on July 2,"2008. . 1/ Plantings along the south property line arc shown on the landscape plan provided to your office on July 2,2008. 17. The landscape plan incorporates the guidelines set forth in Chapter 20G.05.04.F.3, for establishing a screen between the parking area and Old Meridian Street. -y: A soils map will be shown on Sheet C4.2, Erosion Control Notes; a floodplain note based on FEMA mapping will be added to Sheet C 1.0, Topographic Survey and Sheet C3.0, Grading Plan. For your reference, a copy of the portion ofthe FEMA map and the wording of the floodplain notation has been included herein for your use. ;. The lot cover percentage with pavement and building footprint factored in is 72.990/< . .WOODEN & McLAUGHLINLLP Ms. Angelina Conn Page 3 20. A drainage report will be provided once the City Engineer's Office has completed its review and determined the allowable release rate from the contemplated outlet. Please see comment 44d from the comment lettcr provided by the City of Carmel, Department of Engineering, attached herein. , f( The elevation plans currently depict an example of proposed tenant signage on the building fa9ade. The color, design, dimensions and sign material will be fmalized and submitted for approval at a Later date after the final architectural design has been approved by the Plan Commission and in accordance with the needs of future tenants. 22. The site plan (please see attached Sheet C2.0, revised July 14, 2008) now shows the requested improvements. This plan is submitted for purposes of the informal Plan Commission meeting, and a set of revised plans for the entire site will be submitted once this project has been to TAC on July 16th. p. A Lighting pLan was submitted to your office on July 2,2008. The lighting pLan included the foot-candle detail and specifications. The project will not incorporate any sconce lighting. r. Please refer to comments 42 a through 42g and comments 43a through 43k of the comment le~ter provided by the City of Carmel Department of Engineering contained in this submittal which in~icate the Department of Engineering is going through the process of verification and acceptance of the proposed drives. #'. It is apparent that the DOCS is requiring on-street parking for this site as a condition of approval. The site plan (please see attached Sheet C2.0, revised July 14, 2008) now shows the requested improvements. This plan is submitted for purposes of the informal Plan Commission meeting, and a set of revised plans for the entire site will be submitted once this project has been to TAC on July 16th. ' -t. The site plan shows and labels the location for concrete sidewalks in front of the building. The sidewalk is not proposed to include pavers. ~ The EIFS top was switched eliminated on the south end of building as shown on the elevations submitted to your office on July 2,2008. 28. A revised site lighting plan showing the required lighting fixtures with the revised plans addressing TAC comments will be provided following the T AC meeting. l!!:. We believe the lighting plan and specifications provided to your office on July 2, 2008, complies with these requirements. WOODEN & McLAUGHLINLLP Ms. Angelina Conn Page 4 30. We believe the lighting plan and specifications provided to your office on July 2, 2008, complies with these requirements. 31. We believe the lighting plan and specifications provided to your office on July 2, 2008, complies with these requirements. :/.. The building's envelope, HV AC and lighting systems will be designed to maximize energy performance. Roofing and insulation systems will be chosen that will work towards the same end. There will be easily accessible areas that are dedicated to collection and storage of non-hazardous materials for recycling, including paper, corrugated card board, glass, plastic and metals. Petitioner will recycle and or salvage non-hazardous construction debris. Petitioner will choose materials with recycled content. Petitioner will choose materials and products that are extracted and manufactured with in the region to reduce transportation costs. All buildings will be smoke free. There will be ventilation system monitoring to help sustain occupant comfort while maintaining efficiency. There will be a high level of lighting and HV AC system control to help sustain occupant comfort while maintaining efficiency. ~. The parking area will consist of asphalt pavement. t'. Pleac;e see the attached revised site plan showing the locations for bicycle parking. ~. All mecbanical equipment will be located within the buildings and will not be visible to the public. "'- The building material and their colors are shown and depicted on the drawinls-~d elevations provided to your office on July 2,2008. We will provide samples of the building materials at the final Plan Commission and Special Studies meetings. -/. Enclosed is a copy of the colored dumpster elevations. ye The dumpster will be shorter in height than the dumpster enclosure to effectively screen the dumpster. J-'yt: We will work with the Department of Engineering to provide the requested details. 40. Few, if any, existing trees will be preserved along the interior of tbe site due to the natural fall of the site from the north to the south. We believe the landscape plan provides for replacement trees as provided within the ordinances; however, we are WOODEN & McLAUGHLINLLP 1" II Ms. Angelina Conn Page 5 awaiting comment from the City's arborist on our submittal. Additional revisions may be required base upon those comments forthcoming. If We believe the proposed building design complies with this item. t' A variance from the Board of Zoning Appeals was obtained to address this maLter. At. The awnings will be fabric with aluminum framing beneath. Please contact me if you have any questions or comments regarding this matter. ~l%l~ MiWael C. Cook Enclosures cc: Richard Hoover (via email) Bob McGill (via email) Page 1 of2 Conn, Angelina V From: Duncan, Gary R Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 11 :25 AM To: Conn, Angelina V; Brewer, Scott I Cc: Redden, Nick; 'David Lucas'; 'Greg Hayes' Subject: RE: any review comments for plan commission items? Stafford Lane-No issues KFC/Taco Bell-No issu'es; out of our jurisdiction Stout Shoes: Major outstanding issues: 1. Thoroughfare Plan Commitment issue-No discussion had to date with the petitioner 2. We have requested the removal of existing curb cut on Main Street west of the proposed entrance 3. We have asked if the proposed curb cuts onto Old Meridian Street conform to the Old Meridian Task Force report. 4. We have asked that it be verified with the DOCS if the Old Meridian Task Force Report indicates a loop road to the northeast and if this project needs to dedicate right-of-way for such a roadway and if this plan needs to accommodate this roadway as it relates to access (future access will be provided to this site from this roadway and not via a cut onto Old Meridian Street as presently proposed). 5. Although previously indicated that the Department would only support one curb cut from Old Meridian Street, the Department is reviewing the proposed southernmost access from Old Meridian Street. Gary 'U~".'-''''''''"__~_'~~'___'~~~~.mn'.'~~~"....,..",'"",,^'''-'''.''''~'__''_'__'_'__'_." . '~___u~__~"m'"~"'__~_~..,~...~ _~. ~"~.",._~~,,,,'_...,,~,_'w,"'"~~~~_.~ """' ,__ .__ . _~ ~.'"m""~~o"""'~"."_'~_""".""'.""'."~"""'____M______...-"".""..",,,y,,~~,,,,,,,..~,,,,",~~~_~_ From: Conn, Angelina V Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 11:10 AM To: Duncan, Gary R; Brewer, Scott I Cc: Redden, Nick; 'David Lucas'; 'Greg Hayes' Subject: any review comments for plan commission items? Hi, Gary and Scott: Below is a list of the items that will appear at the July 15 plan commission meeting. Please let me know if there are any major concerns or comments, and I will add them to the department report that will go out this Thursday. (Stout shoes and kfc/taco bell will be sent to committee for further review.) Thank you! 2H. Docket No. 08050033 DP/ADi,s: Stout Shoes Buildings The applicant seeks site plan and design approval for two retail/office buildings. The site is located at 13100-13155 Old Meridian Street and is zoned OM!MU -Old Meridian District! Mixed Use. Filed by Michael Cook of Wooden & McLaughlin LLP for Old Meridian & Main Properties, LLC. 3H. Docket No. 08050024 PP Amend: Stafford Lane The applicant seeks primary plat amendment approval for 53 lots on 30 acres. The site is located along 146th St., west of Gray Rd., and is zoned Rl/Residence - ROSa. Filed by Eric Batt of Schneider Engineering for The Drees Company. 4H. Docket No. 08050022 DP/ADLS: KFClTaco Bell (West Carmel Center, Block A, Lot 3) The applicant seeks site plan and design approval for a fast food restaurant. The site is located at 10575 N Michigan Rd. and is zoned B-3/Business within the US 421 Overlay. Filed by Charlie Frankenberger of Nelson & Frankenberger for Yum Brands, Inc. Angie Conn, Planning Administrator Dept. of Community Services - Planning & Zoning 1 Civic Square, 3rd Floor City of Carmel, IN 46032 p.317-571-2417 f, 317-571-2426 aconn@carmel.in.gov 7/10/2008 Xenton C. Ware(, C:rM. Surveyor of3-{ami{ton County 'Phone ('117)776-8495 :fax (117)776-9628 Suite 188 One J{(Imi[[on County Square _1'foh{esvWe, Inmana 46060-2230 www.co.fia1nilton.in.us June 5, 2008 Civil Designs, LLP A TTN: Dick Hoover 2415 Directors Row, Suite E Indianapolis, IN 4624] VIA E-MAIL: rhooven1ikivil-designs.com RE: Stout Shoes Dear M r. Hoover: We have reviewed the construction plans submitted to the Hamilton County Surveyor's OtIice on May 28,2008, for this project and have the following comments: 1. The proposed project falls in the incorporated area and MS4 jurisdiction of the City of CanneL 2. The proposed project DOES NOT fall in a Cannel Wellhead Protection Zone. 3. The proposed project does not fall in a Hamilton County Regulated Drain Watershed. 4. No pennits will be needed from our office. S. Please direct storm sewer and drainage questions to Cannel Engineering Department. Should you have any questions, I can be reached at 317-776-8495. Sincerely, ~ rdoop Greg Hayes, AC, CFM Plan Reviewer CC: Christine Barton-Holmes - Cam1el DOCS John Thomas - Carmel Engineering Dick Hill - Carmel Engineering Greg lIko - Crossroad Engineers I IllJr'1f:"nnrenf May 29, 2008 Richard R. Hoover, PE Civil Designs 2415 Directors Row, Suite E Indianapolis, IN 46241 RE: Job No.: 07-249 Carmel, Indiana Dear Ms. Hoover: The plans submitted for the above-mentioned project have been received and reviewed . At the present time, I see nothing in the plans that would hamper law enforce- ment efforts. If we can be of any further assistance to you, please contact us. Respectfully, ~~ ~J. Green Acting Chief of Police ~~ TJG:vb cc: JDept. of Community Services A Nationally Accredit 13171 571-2500 , orcement Agency l<~I en?) fl7il-2f)12 olL~ Jj? O\L~ d\.L. % 0k-~ OIL7 JIf , CI~~ o'l- ;-f. ~ 13. o~ O~ O~ i}.l;,Yf. 0'0% O~ 20. ol'-X d o\L:.-;B: d~ r;'-jI City of Carmel Via email: mcook@woodmc1aw.com Original by mail May 28, 2008 Michael Cook Wooden & McLaughlin LLP One Indiana Square, Suite 1800 Indianapolis, IN 46204 RE: Stout Shoes Buildings (Docket No. 08050033 DP/ADLS) - Development Plan and Architecture, Design, Landscaping, Lighting & Signage Applications Dear Mike: Below are review comments regarding your DP/ADLS Applications for Stout Shoes Buildings. Additional comments may be made at the July 16 TAC meeting. Please complete and reply to the following items: Please provide a Development Plan (DP) Application. Remember to include the DP application Findings of Fact sheet in your final info packets. Provide the filled out notice of public hearing page of the application. Provide the filled out and notarized affidavit of notice of public hearing page of the application. Provide the filled out Notice of Public Hearing page of the application. Provide the filled out and notarized Public Notice Sign Placement affidavit page of the application. Provide a copy of the Official List of Adjacent Property Owners frol11 Hamilton County Auditor's Office. Provide the signed owner's consent of the southernmost parcel owned by Thomas Mullins. Please provide copies of your correspondence with the T AC members and their correspondence with you. Provide digital copies of the site plan and bui Iding elevations, as pdf files. Provide a graphic of the site plan overlaid on an aerial photo. Bring material/color samples to the Plan Commission meeting. Show/label the truck loading/dock areas and truck turnaround area. Also, check the convenience of the trash dumpster location, regan.lingtruck pick up maneuvering. Show/label easements and utility mains on the landscape plan; the City Forester reviews this. Show the planting details on the landscape plan. Provide landscaping along the south property line. Screen the parking area from Old Meridian Street with more plantings. See chapter 20G.05.04.F.3. Provide a s6i+.HHap and floodplain statement on the plans. Provide the lot cover percentage. Pavement and building footprint should be factored in. Provide drainage calculations to our Department and the City Engineering Dept;G . ~ \ Provide a signage plan and sign d,elairs/colors/material. - >e.e- C.D - ~p~,~d oJ- L~ d~ Carry the sidewalk to the north property line. 4-- OJ)0 ~~ (JV\ l. s. p t(j\V'\ . Please provide the wall sconce light details/specifications, if applicable. Verify your street cut location with the City Engineering Dept. Also see chapter 20G.04.05.E and 20G.04.02.H of the zoning ordinance, and CC-12-06-99-0 I. Show/label on-street parking. Page I ONE CIVIC SQUARE CAR.'vlEL, INDIAN.:" 46032 317/571-2417 cr~ Possibly show/label pavers on the walkway in front of the buildings. O~ Switch the EIFS bottom, with the brick tops on the building elevations. @ Show/label street lighting, per the adopted city style per chapter 20G.04.04; work with the Engineering Dept. ol"-~.. Parking lot lights - please make sure they have flat lenses and 90-dgree cut offs. 70. Photometric Plan: foot candle measurements cannot exceed 0.5 at the property lines. )'!. Show foot-candle measurements at the road right of way and the property lines. ,:J1V)d. Please consider using LEED or 'green' building practices, such as a white roof, solar panels, etc. o\V~ Please consider using pervious pavers in all or part of the parking area. 0"".2'4. Please provide the bike parking detai Is/location; I space per 100-ft of building frontage is required. oV~. Show the mechanical equipment location and how it is screened from view. o'LJt6. Label the buildingfnateri~ o'(...:.;;,i. Provide color elevations for the trash dumpster enclosure. o~ Make sure the dumpster enclosure is taller than the dumpster, itself. #- Prepare an estimated construction cost to comply with the Thoroughfare Plan & Alternative Transportation Plan; contact the Engineering Dept. for more details. ~ Tree preservation is required, per Section 20G.04.06.E of the zoning ordinance. dtf: EIFS can only be used above 8 feet, per chapter 20G.04.0 I.D.3. O~ ~.ZA: a variance may be needed from Chapter 20G.05.04.C.3 for the building occupying less than 70% of he street frontage; Please verify. - b~: rovide more detail on the awnings. Are they a fabric material? If you have any questions or if I may be of assistance, please feel free to call or email me at aconn@carmel.in.gov. SiL Angelina Conn Planning Administrator File: 080500330PAOLS-StomShoesHldgs.doc CC: File Richard Hoover (rhllovcr@civil-dcsigns.com) Page 2 ONE C1 Vie SQUARE CAR1vfEL, INDLu'\J1\ 46032 317/571-2417 Page 1 of 1 Conn, Angelina V From: Conn, Angelina V Sent: Tuesday, May 27,2008 1 :26 PM To: 'Michael C. Cook' Cc: Hollibaugh, Mike P; Holmes, Christine B Subject: stout shoes project - plan commission approval and timeline Attachments: Plan Commission Calendar 200B.pdf Hi Michael - as you saw by my May 23 email, the stout shoes item is on the June 3 committee agenda for feedback only. Also, I want to clarify dates and deadlines, since your engineer told me he was working on construction plans all weekend: When I last spoke to you on the phone and tried to explain the Plan commission approval process, I mentioned that the last filing deadline was May 16 to get on the July 15 plan commission agenda and the June 18 T AC agenda. Since you missed the tac filing deadline by a long shot, your item will be placed on the July 16 tac agenda. I did get your adls application on May 23, but I did not get a development plan (DP) application. I will need that asap. (If you were not aware, the TAC filing deadline is approximately 30 days prior to the TAC meeting date, rather than the 15 days it was last fall. Please see attached 2008 plan commission calendar for more detail). I have come up with this timeline for y:ou that should still satisfy your urgent timetable (the tac meetinq will occur after the first plan commission meeting. which is not typical): July 16 -TAC meeting (June 20 is the filing deadline for this, but it looks like your engineer mailed out plans today, May 27) June 20 - public notice deadline for the July 15 plan commission meeting July 3, noon, fees and 15 info packets due July 11 - proof of public notice due July 15 - plan commission meeting - first appearance August 5 - subcommittee meeting August 19 - plan commission meeting, possible final approval Let me know if you have any questions/concerns. An official docket number assignment email will be sent out shortly. Angie Conn, Planning Administrator Dept. of Community. Services - Planning & Zoning 1 Civic Square, 3rd Floor City of Carmel, IN 46032 p.317-571-2417 f.317-571-2426 aconn@carmel.in.90v 5/27/2008 c:~ Civil Designs ~ REtENm iJl~'( 27 2008- ~ " --- LEITER TRANSMITTAL To: Angie Conn/Christine B-Holmes Date Sent: May 27, 2008 Company: City of Carmel Job #: 07-249 Address: Dept. of Community Services Description: Stout Shoes One Civic Square, 3rd Floor Carmel. Indiana 46032 From: Richard Hoover Phone: 317-571-2417 Telephone: 317-244-1968 Fax: 317-571-2426 Fax: 317-244-1969 o Priority Overnight 0 Standard Overnight D2Day D Rush Courier D Regular Courier 0 Regular Mail Message: p: 317.244.1968 2415 Directors Row, Suite E Indianapolis, Indiana 46241 f: 317.244.1969 Page 1 of2 Conn, Angelina V eI' <..~ ~{){(e..f<e..( From: Holmes, Christine B Sent: Friday, May 02,20082:02 PM To: Holmes, Christine B; Blanchard, Jim E; Boone, Rachel M,; Brennan, Kevin S; Brewer, Scott I; Conn, Angelina V; DeVore, Laura B; Dolan, Veronica A; Donahue-Wold, Alexia K; Duncan, Gary R; Ellison, Christopher M; Foley, Amanda J; Hancock, Ramona B; Hohlt, William G; Hollibaugh, Mike P; Keeling, Adrienne M; Lillard, Sarah N; Littlejohn, David W; Mast, Darren; Mindham, Daren; Miser, Craig; Stewart, Lisa M; Tingley, Connie S; Weddington, Trudy A. Ce: 'mcook@woodmciaw.com' Subject: RE: Docket No. Assignment: (V) Stout Shoes Buildings (#08030010-08030012 V, 08050001 V) _"...,.,,,._,-,-...,._---:c'_,~~~'~~~<~_~'~~~.~'_~..,c__._<'~._~'~..,,.,,........_..,......."~n._~-'~~~,~=.~~~_.___.__'~_.OC_,,''''''''~~,._c-.-=_.-,..'C,-,,,.,.--~-,-,-~~h~~_~~~ From: Holmes, Christine B Sent: Tuesday, March 18/ 2008 1:29 PM To: Blanchard, Jim E; Boone, Rachel M.; Brennan, Kevin S (kbrennan@carmel.in.gov); Brewer, Scott I; Conn, Angelina V; DeVore, Laura B; Dolan, Veronica A; Donahue-Wold, Alexia K; Duncan, Gary R; Ellison, Christopher M; Foley, Amanda J; Hancock, Ramona B; Hohlt, William G; Hollibaugh, Mike P; Holmes, Christine B; Keeling, Adrienne M; Lillard, Sarah N; Littlejohn, David W; Mast, Darren (dmast@carmel.in.gov); Mindham, Daren; Miser, Craig; Stewart, Lisa M; Tingley, Connie S; Weddington, Trudy A. Cc: 'mcook@woodmciaw.com' Subject: Docket No. Assignment: (V) Stout Shoes Buildings (#08030010-08030012 V) I have updated the file. I have contacted the petitioner and issued the necessary Docket Numbers for (V) Stout Shoes Buildings. They will be the following: Docket No. 08030010 V $1430,00 Docket No. 08030011 V $515.00 Docket No. 08030012 V $515.00 Docket No. 08050001 V $515.00 Total Fee: $2975.00 Stout Shoes Buildings The applicant seeks the following development standards variance approvals: Docket No. 08030010 V Section 20G.05.04(A)(3) Retail uses in excess of 50%. Docket No. 08030011 V Section 20G.05.04(B)(2)(a) Height under 28'IOne occupiable floor Docket No. 08030012 V Section 20G.05.04(B)(2) Setback of less than 10'. Docket No. 08050001 V Section 20G.04.01(A) Conformity to established site plan The site is located at 13100-13155 Old Meridian Street and is zoned Old Meridian/Mixed Use within the Old Meridian District. Filed by Michael C. Cook of Wooden & McLaughlin LLP for Old Meridian & Main Street Properties, LLC. Petitioner, please note the following: 1. This item will not need to go to a meeting of the Technical Advisory Committee, 2. Mailed and Published Public Notice needs to occur no later than Thursday, April 3. Published notice is required within the Indianapolis Star. Note: the placement of a public hearing sign on the property is also required by the BZA Rules of Procedure, Article VI, Section 6 (see attached pdf). 3. The Proof of Notice will need to be received by this Department no later than noon, Friday, April 25. Failure to submit Proof of Notice by this time will result in the tabling of the petition. 4. The Filing Fee and Nine (9) Informational Packets must be delivered to BZA Secretary Connie Tingley no later than NOON. Friday, April 18, 2008. Failure to submit Informational Packets by this time will result in the automatic tabling of the petition to the February agenda of the BZA. 5. This Item will appear on the May 19,2008 agenda of the Board of Zoning Appeals under Public Hearings. 5/27/2008 : +2-5--08 2:~1 ) · -:s19t; ~~ ::'lcj,jn~h&JQS 1 . I -/( b\~ dD.lt~ -';> nfs rtJ ~~elcSff}!if. ~Lavca LL~ .~ ~ hLrnJ'L-erLuu .. - 11Md_~ ~ ~. ,~:8K~,e..j~~ -~U:e. ~,i~ LUl-o (~~. i -~~~ l~+ -fl('/ M~-t~.J2~ Itc~ ? : 0, . : Ild I', .. 2nd ft J\D< -" '-Q~ g~ ~~' : \J CLJ:Q~ ~ 0 r\ ~'u Sik fllal!_ . . I i ~f/~.., \~vJL~ Q) W('f1J2/!. i = SiL/~VQ~d7~~ 07'1!M14 rNaltdtKrh i Y3cV ~~ \1Ct2-~ I SIble{ Wl- ~~J ,r =z~ T Page 1 of2 Conn, Angelina V -~-.....,~~~,.,.~,._. _""""","..".~~w_,..,...".~,.,...,.~~.,",_".."...,,_..,........,~".___._-..c,~~~..~~..~.e-< From: McBride, Mike T Sent: Wednesday, November 21,20074:34 PM To: 'Richa'rd Hoover' Cc: Jerry W'illiams; dpeterson@petersonarchitecture,com; hbstout318@yahoo.com; Duncan, Gary R; Conn, Angelina V; Hollibaugh, Mike P Subject: RE: Stout Shoes Development - Main & Old Meridian Dik, The 60' half right of way has been required from all recent developments on Old Meridian. My guess is that we would not b~ abl~ to support relief from this, However, you would need to address the request for variance to the Planning Dept. I've copied them on this email so they are aware of your desires. Thanks, 01LcftaJi fJ. 01Lffik1J", 9'.~. City Engilleer City Of Carmel Indiana One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 phone: (317) 571-2441 fax: (317) 571-2439 From: RicHard Hoover [mailto:rhoover@Civil-Designs.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 3:00PM To: McBride, Mike T Cc: Jerry Williams; dpeterson@petersonarchitecture.com; hbstout318@yahoo.com Subje'tt: Stout Shoes Development - Main &. Old Meridian Mike, I received your preliminary comments regarding the Stout Shoes site and have some questions that perhaps you can help me with. One of the comments was regarding the proposed 60'-half R/W for both Main and Old Meridian. We understand this is a requirement of the Thoroughfare Plan; however, is that amount of R/W really necessary? The Old Meridian improvements were just made giving Old Meridian 2 lanes in both directions with a grossed median which fits well within the existing 50'-half R/W. Does Carmel believe that additional lanes in the future will be necessary? Old Meridian continues north for perhaps a half-mile and then connects into U.S. 31. Main Street currently has a 40'-half R/W, and looking at the locations of existing buildings to the east, it would be difficult for Carmel to improve that street to anything more than what Old Meridian now has. How do we go about asking for 0 reducf'ion in the Thoroughfare Plan R/W requirements? I've never done it in Carmel before, and my only experience in that sort of thing is with Indy where you request a reduction in writing from DPW. The humber of drives is something that we'll probably need to discuss further. We think that the site will support 3 drives,and there are currently 5. l1l26/2007 . .. Page 2 of2 Another c9mment you had dealt with the multi-use paths. Carmel just placed asphalt paths along Old Meridian with the new improvements. Are you sure we need to tear out those paths and place new ones? Thanks, Dik Dik Hoover Civil Designs, LLP 241S'DircCfoTs Row, Suite E Indiallapolis,Indiana 46241 Tel 317-244-1968 Fax 317-244,.1969 Cell 317-441-8682 11/26/2007