HomeMy WebLinkAboutDept Report 10-25-04
u
u
CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
DEPARTMENT REPORT
October 25, 2004
2h. Martin Marietta, Appeal to Director's Determination of
The applicant would like to appeal a Director determination that Martin Marietta's op~ration is a legal,
nonconforming use: Docket No. 04070020 A Chapter 28.06 Existence of a Nonconforming Use
The site is located north of 106lh Street and west of Hazel Dell Parkway and is zoned $-llResidence -
Low Intensity. Filed by Tom Yedlick.
General Information:
The following are ,excerpts from
the Zoning OrdinaPce, regarding
the Appeal Procedure.
Zoning Ordinance, Section 30.02:
Appeal Procedure
30.02.01 Consultation with the
Director and Application. Appellants
shall meet with the Director in order to
examine the nature of the proposed
appeal, review the regulatory
ordinances and materials, and review
the appeal procedures. The Director
shall aid the appellant m preparing his
application and sU"Rporting documents
as necessary. The ~ppellant shall then
submit two (2) copies of-the written application form and all necessary supporting documents
and materials.
30.02.02 Initial Review of the Application and Supporting Documents and Materials by the Director;
Submission to the Board. Following the receipt of the \vritten appeal application and necessary
supporting documents and materials by the Director, he shall then review the materials solely for the
purpose. of determining whether the application is complete, is in technical compliance with all
applicable ordinances, laws and regulations and is to be forwarded to the Board. If the materials
submitted by the appellant arc not complete, or do not comply with the necessary legal requirements, the
Director shal1 infonn the appellant of the deficiencies in his materials. Unless and until the Director
formally accepts the appeal application as complete and in legal compliance it shall110t be considered as
formally filed for the purpose of proceeding to the succeeding steps toward Board consideration of the
appeal as hereinafter set forth. The application is formally filed when it is placed upon the Board agenda
by the Director according to the Board's Rules of Procedure.
30.02.03 Public Hearing bv the Board. Once the Director has accepted and filed the appeal application with
the Board, he shall assign a docket number and set a date and time for a public hearing as required by
the Rules of Procedure of the Board. The appellant shall be responsible for the cost and publication of
the required published legal notification of the public hearing. The appellant shall also notify all
interested parties and property owners as required by the Rules of Procedure of the Board. The conduct
of the public hearing shall be in accordance with the Board's Rules of Procedures.
30.02.04 Approval or Denial of the Appeal bv the Board. Following the public hearing 011 the appeal, the
Board shall approve or deny the appeal. In exercising its powers, the Board may reverse or affirm,
wholly or partly, or may modify the order, requirement, decision or determination appealed as in its.
opinion ought to be done on the premises, and to that end shall have all the powers of the officer or
u
u
Board from whom the appeal is taken. Upon reaching a decision on the appeal request, the Board shall
enter into its records the reasons for its decision and shall provide the appellant with a copy of said
reasons, if requested. The Board shall inform the :pirector and the appellant of its declSlon, including all
conditions contained as a part thereof: All further actlOns taken by the appellant or the Director
concerning the item that was appealed, including the issuance of Improvement Location Permits, shall
be subj ect to said ruling of the Board.
BZA Rules of Procedure: Article V. Appeals.
Section 1. An appeal from any order, requirement, decision or determination made by an administrative official
or board charged with the enforcement of any zoning ordinance shall be filed with the BZA.
Section 2. (a) The appeal shall be filed with the BZA within thirty (30) days of the decision of the enforcing
official or board that-is being contested. In those cases where the thirtieth day falls on a Saturday, a
Sunday, a legal holiday, or a day on which the office is closed, the filing deadline s~all be extended to
the end of the next business day.
(b) The. appeal shall be filed in duplicate on a form provided by the BZA and, shall specify the
grounds thereof in such a manner as to fully inform the BZA of all facts and elements involved,
including a clear statement of the reason(s) why the applicant deems the appeal to be justified.
Any communication purporting to be an appeal or petition shall be regarded a~ a mere notice of
intention to seek relief and shall be of no force or effect until made in the fonn! required.
(c) When appropriate, the applicant shall provide the BZA with copies 01 any documents
supporting his or her case.
(d) The Office of the BZA shall review the application and place it on the BZA's agenda when
it is in technical and legal compliance.
Section 3. Following placement on the agenda, the BZA or its delegate shall assign a docket number and fix a
date, time and place for the public hearing. The Office of the BZA shall so notify the applicant.
Section 4. The administrative official or board from whom the appeal is taken shall, upon request of the BZA,
transmit to it all documents, plans, papers, etc., leading to the decision being appealed.
Section 5. When an appeal has been filed with the BZA, proceedings on the premises affected shall be stayed
unless the official or board certifies to the BZA that a .stay would cause imminent peril to life or
property. In that case proceedings may only be stayed by. a restraining order. The BZA may issue a
restraining order after application, notice to the officer or board and to the owner of the premises
affected, and upon due cause shown. The official or board charged with the enforcement of the
ordinance may call upon the police power of the City or Township to give effect to that order.
Recommendation:
The Departments requests that the Board affirm the subject determination and further request
the Board adopt the Findings presented by Zeff Weiss ofIce Miller, on behalf of Martin
Matietta Materials.