HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence
V/ "-~
~....- -
Wold, Alexia K
Froin:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Wold, Alexia K
Friday, July 01,20053:29 PM
'joseph ,scim ia@bakerd.com'
Carmel Plan Commission Special Studies Committee Department Report
Date: July 1, 2005
To: Joseph Scimia
From: City of Carmel, Department of Community Services
You are listed as the contact person for Docket No. 30-03 DP/ADLS: Clarian North Hospital. Please share this information
with your Petitioner(s).
Attaced is the section of the Department report for the Carmel Plan Commission Special Studies Committee
meeting July 5, 2005, which applies to your petition.
iJ
~
~Sg
30"03 Clarian North
HospitaLd...
Please call if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Alexia Donahue Wold
City of Carmel
Department of Community Services
317-571-2417
1
.'
t.
u u
City of Carmel
Inter-Office Memorandum
Department of Engineering
December 5, 2003
TO: Jef~ Kendall, Building & Code Enforcement
cc: Gayle Stahl, Building & Code Enforcement
Jon Dobosiewicz, Planning & Zoning
Mike McBride, Department of Engineering ~
FROM: Dick HiH,~epartment of Engineering ~~
RlC,:~'!P;t>im~~llinu-l-~5.90nr~0I:th"l\1eridl,:~~
.....~ ~, ~ c-b' _____
~.-:l'Tf--..'
~ ~/"l~
\' q ~'-.t~"/ ').
,,f.,,,'- 1::, 1':'\.
/ ,~ "', t"",
..y Rr:rf:fl/c~:
r I . L..J '. LD
I~ C:;'ilf!3 i";
~(-, DOCS r.';/
V,.\ /;:: .,/
v/').,,\y
'./P'": /< ..
"~)---f/;.":;l;;1'\\'\;'
~~
The Department of Engineering approved the plans for this Development on June 18, 2003. The approved plans
included the construction of a multi-use asphalt path and a deceleration lane in the right of ,vay of 136th Street,
adjacent to the north boundary of the development. After approval of the project, Frank Cosmas of F.C.C.
Development, the Developer of the project, contacted then City Engineer Kate "Weese regarding a power pole
conflict. The pole was and is located where the deceleration lane would go. We would normally require the
Developer to bear this expense. However, in discussions with PSI/CINergy, the utility indicated that it would not
be possible to movejust one pole. In fact, due to alignment/power loss issues, a total of five poles would have to be
rclocated at a cost estimated at over $50,000.00. Kate made the decision that these poles would be included in and
relocated with the future Illinois Street/136th & Illinois Roundabout projects. Frank Cosmas was given approval
to delay the construction of the decellane until such time the poles were relocated. Given this scenario, it does not
make sense to construct the asphalt path until the poles are relocated. The path would probably not survive
during the process.
Frank Cosmas expressed concern that this issue would affect the Certificates of Occupancy for this
development. Therefore, I asked him to prepare a letter of commitment regarding these two items. He has
done so, has had it recorded and I have attached a copy of this recorded commitment to this correspondence.
With this commitment, Engineering is satisfied that these items will be constructed as required at some point
in the future. In addition, the Department of Engineering is holding a Performance Guarantee for this
construction. Therefore, we request that the construction of the path and decellane not prevent Certificates
of Occupancy being issued.
d:tt1 ~
~.;.
U
(\\),
\.A~
, \
U
A
1[.~. (C.
.&g :e.". :III....lI...~. .-=:1~1!b _...I..lI:a:a-:,
i\ tradlllun buill 011 quallly aod ~crvIG~
u
December 4, 2003
Mr. Dick Hill, Engineering Dept.
, City of Carmel
One Civic SqJare
Carmel, IN 46032
21!0300122500
Flied for R~cord in
HRl1ILTnN COUNTY INDIANA
JENNIFER J HAYDEN '
12-05-2003 Rt09-42 am
LETTER . 9.00'
Dear Mr. Hill:
Please consider this as F,C.C. Development Corp. 's letter of commitment and
responsibility to construct a multi-use asphalt path and deceleration lane in the south right
of way of 136th Street adjacent to the Meridian North Medical Building, per plans
approved on June 18,2003 by the City of Carmel for the Meridian North Medical
Building. This facility is located at 13590-B North Meridian Street.
These improvements cannot be constructed at this time due to the location of existing
power poles and overhead electrical lines. While there is only one pole in conflict,
PSI/CINergy has indicated that a total of 5-poles will require relocation. We have
discussed this with former City Engineer Kate Weese and, as a result of our
conversations, it is our understanding that the City of Carmel will include this relocation
with their Illinois Street and 136th/Illinois Street Roundabout project(s).
Following the relocation of these power poles and power lines, and/or as directed by the
City of Carmel, the construction of the path and deceleration lane will proceed as
specifi,ed, on appro~~d plans for the Meridian North Medical Building.
We understand that the Performance Guarantee posted with the City for this work will
not be released until the construction has been completed and accepted by the city.
~
Frank . osmas
F.e.C. Development Corp,
Meridian North Medical, LLC.
COMMERCIAL ... RESIDENTIAL ... BUILDERS .... DEVELOPERS
PO.Box157.r.:lrIllrl,lIlCli:lIl:l "GO}:? Pll:1117lB"()-'iilO() F^X:(T17)H/IH,Hfllll
L
C!Vi..( ~.(
( \ . ('\ .
ON-SIT~ ALUA nON FOR EROSION AND SEDI~NT CONTROL
Hamilton County Soil and Water Conservation District
1108 South 91h Street, Noblesville, IN 46060
Email at iohn-soutb@iaswcd.org Ph: 317-773-2181 Fax: 317-776-1101
....
Date 11-19-03
-;0,0 ';)}>Q \ f\OL ~
~
Carmel DOCS
Ha. Co. Surveyor
Project Name Clarion North Hospital
Present at Site: John South, Hamilton Co. SWCD;
This Report Provided To: Bob Louzon /"
Pepper Construction
Email-blouson@pepperconstruction.com
Initial X Routine ::::
TYPE OF EV ALVA nON:
Follow-up
:::: Complaint
This evaluation is intended to assess the level of compliance with 327 lAC] 5-5 (Rule 5). It is also intended to identifY areas where
additional measures may be required to cantm.l erosion and sedimentation. All practices recommended in this report should be
evaluated as to theirfeasibility by a qualified individual with structural practices designed by a qualified engineer.
All erosion and sediment control measures shall meet the design criteria, standardv, and specifications outlined in the "Indiana
Handhook/or Erosion Control in Developing Areas" or similar guidance documents.
Current Site Information: Initial grading is completed. The building is progressing with the steel frame. Stone
pads are installed at the south end of the site for parking, lay down and site trailers. The pond at he south end is
started but to wet to complete. The berm along the cast side is seeded and vegetation is established. The outlet
for the basin is incorrectly installed.
The Following Items Have Been Evaluated and Assigned a Designation of:
S = Satisfactory M = Marginal U = Unsatisfactory NA = Not Applicable
Construction Site Management for Erosion and Sediment Control
U (1) Disturbed areas have been adequately protected through seeding or other appropriate erosion and
sediment control measures.
U
N/A
U
S
N1A
S
S
N/A
(2) Appropriate perimeter sediment control measures have been implemented.
(3) Conveyance channels have been stabilized or protected with appropriate sediment control measures.
(4) Erosion & sediment control measures are installed properly.
(5) Stann drain inlets have been adequately protected.
(6) Outlets have been adequately stabilized.
(7) Existing erosion & sediment control measures are being maintained.
(8) Public & private roadways are being kept clear of accumulated sediment or tracked soil.
(9) Erosion & sediment control measures have been installed and maintained on individual building sites.
Status of Sediment Retention On-Site
X Site conditions present a high potential for off-site sedimentation.
There is evidence of off-site sedimentation.
Describe:
Satisfactory:
Marginal:
Unsatisfactory:
Not Applicable:
X Please Refer to the Comments Section of this Report
Definitions
The item is currently in compliance with the Rule
A concern has been identified; corrective action is strongly recommended to remain in compliance
A violation has been identified and the site is not in compliance; corrective action is required
Does not apply at this stage of construction
Re~ised 4/98
ON-SI!~~V AUlA nON FOR EROSION AND sEor~hT CONTROL
.,J....
COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME: Clarion North Hospital
Page 2
The items checked below must be corrected prior to _12-19-03 , unless otherwise noted.
X Install an appropriate sediment control practice between construction areas and lower lying areas. The slotted riser outlet
structure is not correctly installed. The riser should be located on the west side of the berm, not in the middle of it. The top
of the riser should be 12" below the top of dam. A stone emergency spillway should be installed to pass larger storm events.
Replace/Repair silt fence and/or straw bale barriers.
Entrench silt fence (6-8 in.) and/or straw bale barriers (4 -6 in.) and stake straW bales.
Remove accumulated sediment from: sediment traps/basins, behind silt fence/straw bales, around storm drain inlet
protection devices, streets and gutters (Do not flush with water)
Temporary seed, fertilize, and/or mulch: .
Pem1anent seed, fertilize, and mulch areas that are at final
grade:
Protect storm drain inlets: curb inlets, drop inlets
Reshape and stabilize sideslopes of: sediment traps/basins, detention/retention basins
Install/Maintain construction entrance(s):
Reshape and stabilize conveyance channels:
Place greater emphasis on erosion and sediment control on building sites; contractors, subcontractors, material vendors, and
others should be made aware of erosion and sediment control requirements. Appropriate perimeter sediment controls
(e.g. silt fence) and stable construction enti'ances shall be utilized on all sites. Sediment tracked into the street shall be
removed (do not flush with water) at the end of each work day.
Note: Disturbed soils will need to be protected over winter if active construction is not occurring. Straw
mulch is recommended. A crimper can be used to bold the straw in place.
This report submitted by: John B. South P.E. CPESC
Rl!Vised 4/98
.
u
~l fir Clarian Hej"\h
1111 Methodist .IU .fii(ey
October 6, 2003
Facilities
Design & Construction
Mr. Jeff Kendall
City of Carmel
One Civic Square
Carmel, IN 46032
\rwv
o ? 1>\?
'~O -'
. t~fl ...
Re: elari~D':N'o:rth Q.a'mp~'
~"1 :6Y':' 'S:tteet4~u\lift 1\1J efidic.Hl
~ ~ {fu~~
Dear Mr. Kendall:
This letter is written in regard to the Clarian North Campus Hospital Project located at the
northwest corner of 116th and Meridian. As indicated on the City of Carmel thoroughfare
plan dated October 2001, Clar;an Health Partners, Inc. will commit to providing the
required 75-feet of right-of-way along the northern boundary of 116\11 Street from the
western boundary of US 31 (Meridian Street} to the eastern boundary of Illinois Street.
P~ease contact me with any comments or questions you may have.
Sincerely,
~X.{j~
David L. Doell
Manager
CC: Joseph Scimia, Baker & Daniels
Jamie Poczekay, American Consulting
Steve AlIemeier, Pepper Construction
Project File: 0' -8D-003
I'-C!, Hi" ,'1'1",
Illd i" n.1[I( ,Ii '. 111IIi,ITi'-'
.1\):2I.l; -.- ii".::")
J 17 'l(,~-!l)(](] W',,1('IJ I i,l1'/l
.117 Q('2 -2l\H "II ice
j 17 %:',j I 02 1,1X
Clarian Hc~lth Partners, Inc
l. r I ~i III -.!' 1 ~(I'( '~:I
\\'\v\\-".(I,'li<'in>;...r~
Sla I] 0 H:\DEBBIE\WORD\chrianrighlofway for the Nurth Hospital - IO-06-03.doc
;
u
u
FACILITIES DEPARTMENT
FAX COVER SHEET
~1 f Clarian Health
tnl M.,lhodisl'IU.Riley
1-65 31 21s1 Sln'let
P.O. Box 7195
Indianapolis, Indiana 46207.7195
(317) 962-2834 (phone)
(317) 962-3182 (fax)
FROM:
October 6, 2003
Jamie
American Consulting, Inc.
Debbie Holloway
Methodist Hospital
TIME:
PHONE:
FAX:
PHONE:
FAX:
1 :35 PM
547-5580
543-0270
962-2834
962-3182
DATE:
TO:
RE: Ctarian North Campus Hospital Project - Right-of-Way
Number of pages including cover sheet: [2]
Message
Jamie, please find attached the above referenced memo to Mr. Jeff Kendall signed by Dave
Doell.
Thank you.
- . _I
..-....-- .--,....-.................. ,..........................
..I....... .............. ................ ............... ....._.........
PROJECT NAME:
( , ( )
ERO~ON AND.~'SEDIMENT'CONTR PLAN
TECHNICAL REVIEW AND COMMENT
Hamilton County Soil and Water Conservation District
1108 South 9th Street, Noblesville IN 46060
Ph- 317-773-1432 or Email at. ohn-south@:liaswcd.or
[QI'1f.".ri.~"!..! ...' tsl".',..'o~rtu~h~M~sni]ail~~,
~w~.rt-'".- .
,.
SUBMITTED BY:
Clarian Health Partners
1901 North Senate Avenue
Indianapolis, IN 46202
317-962-203 I
Jamie Poczekay
American Consulting
7260 Shadcland Station 11 .
Indianapolis, IN 46256 ~ V
i1/O
REVIEWED BY:
John B. South P.E.
Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control
PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURE: Plan Revie\\-' Date: 9/5/03
Acreage: 70 ac
LOCATION: N. side of 116lh Street on the west side ofSR 31
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sec. 35
TO\\1NSHIP: 18N
RANGE: 3E
CIVIL TOWNSHIP: Clay
SOIL SURVEY MAP SHEET: 50
The technical review and comments are intended to evaluate the completeness of the erosion and sediment control plan for the
project. The erosion and sediment control plan submitted was not reviewedfor the adequacy of the engineering design. All
practices included in the plan, as well as those recommended in the comments should be evaluated as to their feasibility by a
qualified individual with structural practices designed by a qualified engineer. The plan has not been reviewedfor local, state,
urfederal permits that may be required to proceed with this project. Additional information, including design calculations may
be requested to further evaluate the erosion and sediment control plan.
The erosion and sediment control plan has been reviewed and it has been determined that the plan:
X Satisfies the minimum req uirements and intent of 327IAC 15-5 (Rule 5). Notification will be forwarded to the
Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
Note: Please check that all dimensions and elevations are correct on Sediment Basin Detail.
Proper implementation of the erosion and sediment control plan and inspections o/the construction site by the developer or a
representative are necessary to minimize offsite sedimentation. The developer should be aware that unforeseen construction
activities and weather conditions may effect the performance (if a practice or the erosion and sediment control plan. 777e plan
must be aflexible document, with provisions to modifY or substitUlepractices as necessary.
Revised 4/97
Cc: Carmel DOCS
Ha. Co. Surveyor
IDEM
File
JUL-22-~003 07:43 FROM:HAMILTONc:J HWY DEP 3177769814
~ .
,.
TO: 31.'7' 571 2426
-",0
P.001/002
RE:
\(CI~lTjOr'1 ~(orth';M,edi~1 Cemf:ir' ,:~'
Construction Plans -
N qf 1161J'1 Street I W of US 31
Clay Township
HAMILTON COUNTY
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
--~~~
~I~ . 8
I\."O?:' 0~~~
V ~'f '(~
'/hRECf/VED ~
t!. Z 22 l(}OJ :=)
~ DOCS
~~
'e
c; '\.
July 22. 2003
Ms. Jamie Poez:ekay
American Consultlng Inc.
7260 Shadeland Station
Indianapolis. Indiana 46256-3917
Dear Ms. Poczekay:
This letter serves to acknowledge receIpt of a transmittal received 1114/03 containing the
plans for the above-mentioned ~roject. After reviewing the plans the Highway
Department has the following comments:
1. An Application for Project R.view needs to be completed and the appropriate
revIew fees for a Construction Plan paid, before any approvals will be granted from
this office. I have enclosed a blank form for your use.
2. The Highway Department Is still awaiting a eopy of the Traffic Study that was
conducted in association with this project. Per our comments at the February 19,
2003 Carmel TAC meeting, additional comments may be necessary after reviewing
the Trafflc.Study.
3_ Please note that decorative signs, sprinkler systems, trees, landscaping mounds,
fences, light poles or other such amenities are not permitted in the right of way.
4. In accordance with the Hamilton County Thoroughfare Plan, additional right of way is
required at this location. On Sprlngmm Road, the right of way from the Intersection to
a point 500' to the north is a 65' half. From that point to the northern property line the
right of way Is SO', A trlan~Ular right of way cut Is required at the inter~ec.tion of
Springmlll Road and 116 Street. The cut should consls1 of tlNo 50' tnangular legs.
On 116!h Street, the right of way from the intersection of spnngmlll Road to a point
500' to the east is an 80' harf, From that point to the east. the half right of way 1$ a
70' halt On 11Slh Street, the right of way from the intersection of US 31 to a point
500' to the west is an 80' half. From that point to the west, the half right of way is a
70' half, The additional right of way will also be required at the intersection of the .
proposed Illinois Street. Right of way requirements along US 31 will be determined
by the IndIana Department of Transportation.
5. The right in only entrance shown west of US 31, on 116!h Street. will not be
permitted.
6. The follOWing improvements will be required on 116th Street:
. Two continuous lanes, 12' wide, for east and west bound traffic from US 31 to
$pringmill Road. The alignment of the lanes must coordinate with the proposed
170D South it)'" Street
Nobks."U1Il, In. 46060
wwW.co.bllmilton.in.us
Office (317) 773-7770
Fax (317) 776-9814
JUL -22-2003 07: 43 FROM: HAMIL TO~I ":0 HWY DEP 3177769814
, b (..)
.
TO :,"'.:] 571 2426
U
P.002/002
HAMILTON COUNTY
HIOHWA Y DEPARTMENT
intersection of 116\h Street and illinois Street. The lanes will also need to
accommodate the planned improvements at 1161~ Street and Sprlngmill Road.
II A continuous center turn lane, 1 S' wide.
o Pavement markings
. Right tum lanes at Illinois Street and Sprlngmill Road
. Relocation of utilities
G Tne minimum pavement section for 1161h Street will be a 14" stone base, 5" HAC
binder and 1 " HAC surfa.ce.
7. Improvements to Springmill Road will be required when plans are proposed for the
area west of Illinois Street.
8. Are asphalt paths/sidewalks required along 11Slh Street .and Sprlngmill Road?
9. Any utility work performed within the right af way of 11Slh Street or Springmill Road
will require permits from this office.
If you have any questions or comments concerning this letter. please feel free to contact
me at anytime.
Sincerely,
~/~-
4::::n J. Broermann
Staff Engineer
cc: Brad Davis ~ Hamilton County Highway Department Director
Jim Neal. Hamilton County Highway Department Engineer
Joel Thurman ~ Hamilton County Highway Department
Jon Oobosiewicz: - Carmel Department of Community Services
Kate Weese -City of Carmel Engineer
Jerry Liston - Hamilton County Surveyors Office
Joe $cimia - Baker & Danlols
Bob Lauzon ~ Pepper Constr1.lction
G;\U$ E"S\SEl\03r~c\01 "~i -03elario"nct'lh .doc
Ii, '
I;'~ .
,..:~""~--',/
./' >:
1100 South 10.' Street
NoblesvUle. In. 46060
ww:w .co.IJ!!l}JJ.!.~tl...ID.J!.".
Office (317) 773.'77'70
Fu (317) 776.9814
(
\
ERO ON AND SEDIMENT CONTR PLAN
TECHNICAL REVIEW AND COMMENT
Hamilton County Soil and Water Conservation District
1108 South 9th Street, Noblesville IN 46060
Ph- 317-773-1432 or Email at 'ohn-south@Jiaswcd.or
PROJECT NAME:
Clarion N011h Hospital
SUBMITTED BY:
Clarian Health Partners
190 I North Senate Avenue
Indianapolis, IN 46202
3] 7-962-2031
Jamie Poczekay
American Consulting
7260 Shadeland Station
Indianapolis, IN 46256
REVIEWED BY:
John B. South P.E.
Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control
PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURE: Plan Review Date: 7/14/03
Acreage: 70 ac
LOCATION: N. side of 1 16th Street on the west side of SR 31
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sec. 35
TOWNSHIP: 18N
RANGE: 3E
CIVIL TOWNSHIP: Clay
SOIL SURVEY MAP SHEET: 50
The technical review and comments are intended [0 evaluate the completeness of the erosion and sediment control plan/or the
project, The erosion and sediment control plan submitted was not reviewed/or the adequacy of the engineering design. All
practices included in the plan, as well as those recommended in [he comments should be evaluated as to theirfeasibility by a
qualified individual wi[h s[ruc[ural practices designed by a qualified engineer, The plan has not been reviewedfor local, state,
orfrderal permits that may be required to proceed with [his project. Additional information, including design calculations may
be requested co fitrther evaluate the erosion and sediment control plan.
The erosion and sediment control plan has been reviewed and it has been determined that the plan:
Satisfies the minimum requirements and intent of 327IAC 15-5 (Rule 5). Notification will be forwarded to the
Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
Refer to the comments section for additional information.
X Does not satisfy the minimum requirements and intent of 3271AC 15-5 (Rule 5); deficiencies are noted in the
checklist and in the comments section. Deficiencies constitute potential violations of the rule and must be
adequately addressed for compliance. The information necessary to satisfy the deficiencies must be submitted:
Proper implementation of the erosion and sediment control plan and inspections of the wns[ruction si[e by the developer or a
representative are necessary to minimize offsite sedimentation. The developer should be aware that unforeseen construction
activities and weather conditions may effect the performance of a practice or [he erosion and sediment con[rol plan. The plan
must be aflexible document, wi[h provisions to modify or substitute practices as necessary.
Revised 4 / 97
PROJECT: Clarion North HoSPbr(
u
Page 2 of3
Yes No
x IA
X IE
x IC
x ID
X IE
Yes No
x 2A
x 2B
x 2C
x 2D
x 2E
x 2F
x 2G
x 2H
x 21
Yes No
x 3A
X 38
Yes No
x 4A
X 48
X 4C
x 4D
x 4E
x 4F
x 4G
x 4H
x 41
N/A 4.J
x 4K
ARE THE FOLLOWING lTEMS ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED ON THE PLANS?
(All Plalls Must Include Appropriate Legends, Scales, and North Arrow)
(ltems tlrat are Not Applicable to thi,<; Project are designated by NA)
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Location Map (Show prqject in relation to other areas qfthe cOllnty)
Narrative Describing the Nature and Purpose of the Project
Location of Planned and/or Existing Roads, Utilities, Structures, Highways, etc.
Lot andlor Building Locations
Landuse of Adjacent Areas
(Show the Entire Upstream Watershed and Adjacent Areas Within 500 Feet of the Property Lines)
TOPOGRAPHIC, DRAINAGE, AND GENERAL SITE FEATURES
Existing Vegetation (Identify and Delineate)
Location and Namc of All Wetlands, Lakes and Water Courses On and Adjacent to the Site
100 Year Floodplains, Floodway Fringes, and Floodways (Note if None)
Soils Information (If hydric soils are present, it is the responsibility of the owner/developer to
investigate the existence of wetlands and to obtain permits ;rom fhe appropriafe government agencies)
Existing and Planned Contours at an Interval Appropriate to Indicate Drainage Patterns
Locations of Specific Points Where Stormwater Discharge Will Leave the Site
Identify All Receiving Waters ( If Discharge is to a Separate Municipal Storm 5'ewer, identify the
Name of the Municipal Operator and the Ultimate Receiving Water)
Potential Areas Where Storm water May Enter Groundwater (Note if None)
Location of Stormwater System (Include Culverts, Storm Sewers, Channels, and Swales)
LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES
Location and Approximate Dimensions of All Disturbed Areas [Le" Constmction Limits]
(Areas Where Vegetative Cover Will Be Preserved Should be Clearly Designated)
Soil Stockpiles and or Borrow Areas (Show Locations or Note if'None)
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES
Sequence of When Each Measure Will Be Implemented (Relative to Earth Disturbing Activities)
Monitoring and Maintenance Guidelines for Each Measure
Perimeter Sediment Contrul Measures (Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions. and :Specifications)
Temporary Seeding (Specifications; Including Seed Mix, Fertilizer, Lime, and Mulch Rates)
Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Measures
(Loca/ion, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications)
Permanent Erosion and Sediment Control Measures
(Low/ion, Construe/ion Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications)
Storm Drain Inlet Protection (Location. Construction Detai!, Dimensions, and Specifications)
Stormwater Outlet Protection (Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications)
Stable Construction Entrance (Location. Constrllction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications)
Erosion and Sediment Control on Individual Building Lots (Specifications)
Permanent Seeding (Specifications; Including Seed Mix, Fertilizer, Lime. and.Mulch Rates)
Revised 4 197
ERblrON AND SEDIl\.1ENT CONTR~ PLAN
TECHNICAL REVIEW
COMMENTS
PROJECT: Clarion North Hospital
Page 3 00
Note: All erosion and sediment control mea.mres shown OJI the pLans alld referenced in this review must meet the design
criteria, standards, alld specifications outlined in the "Indiana Handbook for Erosion Control in De}'eloping Areas "from the
Jndiana IJepartment of Natural Resources, Division of Soil Conservation or si",il{rr Guidmrce DOCllment~..
Sheet C6.2 is not included with the prints.
4A. A detailed construction sequence is needed that will direct the contractor to build the project in a manor
that will reduce the risk of offsite sedimentation.
4C. Two sediment basins are proposed. The construction details of the basins are not shown. Dimensions or
proposed contours of the temporary basins are needed. The drawings for storm structure #80 show a horse
shoe dam in front of the discharge pipe. The details provide for a slotted riser. The slotted riser is preferred.
On the details for the sediment basin structures, it appears that the information for the north and south basins
is incorrect. While the site is being filled to grade and afterward, how is the stormwater directed into the
sediment basins? A check dam is recommended on the west side of structure #8] .
40. It has been experience that the final landscaping and tree planting will be completed at the end oftlle
project. Disturbed ground in these and other areas need to be seeded with a temporary grass mixture.
4H. Protection from soil erosion is needed at the outfaIls ofthe storm sewers.
4K. A permanent seeding spec is needed.
Below is a sample erosion control sequence for a small commercial site.
Draft Erosion and Sediment Control Sequence for Typical Commercial Construction Site
]. Before construction, evaluate, mark, and protect important trees and associated rooting zones; unique
areas (e.g., wetlands) to be preserved, and vegetation suitable for filter strips
2. Install construction entrance
3. Install perimeter BMPs (show on drawing and provide specific instructions)
(Provide earthmoving instructions that compliment erosion and sediment control plan)
4. Start mass earthwork
Establish staging area
Start buildlng construction and/or basement excavation
Finish grade and seed basins, slopes, swales and mounds
Temporary seed all disturbed areas
5. Install storm and sanitary sewer and utilities
6. Install inlet protection as storm inlets are completed
7. Complete parking lots, roadways and curbs
8. Temporary seed all disturbed areas
9. Complete building
( ) U
10. Final grade and landsca'fl'rng
11. Complete final seeding
12. Maintain all erosion and sediment control practices until all disturbed areas are permanently
stabilized
Cc: Carmel DOCS
Ha. Co. Surveyor
Ha. Co. Highway
File
~
2:55 PM FR BAKER D~NIELS 3 317 569 4800 TO 10842"22547U3281 P.02/02
U U
BAKER & DANIELS
MAY 19..2003
I:':ST,1I!S3
96TH sTREOi:'f OI'l"ICI!:
"Q!;! 1;;. ~G'r'H $TIU!l!"r, SUITE: 600 . INDIA.NAPOLIS. INDIANA 4EiZ40 . \~17) 56$-&600 . F"AX (31?) 559.41100 . WWW,I)$~~rdan.~J&.c(),"
DlRECT '~'7) DI5~......tX'IQ
01Rtey "AX ~:!lt7) 287.a580
liI"'mQU~ jm"(l'miDCb;;skard.c;;om
INOIANAPOLI$
,,"ORT WAYNE
sOUTH 9E:ND
€LI<MAAT
WASHINGTON, D.r;::,
QINGDAO, P.R. t;:HINA
JOSEPH M. SCIMIA
May 19, 2003
Mr. Jon Dobosiewicz
City of Carmel
Department of Community Services
One Civic Square
Cannel, IN 46032
Re: ~l)1='7ADLS; .Claria.rlNorth Hdijjj@;?
...
REr' ':If~
p" " ~ 1 I))
~?A} 1'"
DOCS
Dear Mr. Dobosiewicz;
On behalf of our cuent, Clarian Health Partners, Inc., we request that the
above-referenced petitions be continued from the May ZO, 2003 meeting of the Carmel/Clay Plan
Commission to their June 17. 2003 meeting. While the Subdivision Committee has voted to
forward the DPI ADLS petitions to the Plan Commission with a favorable recommendation. we
request that the DPI ADLS petitions be continued in anticipation that the rezoning petition win be
presented with the DPJADLS petitions at the June Plan Commission meeting.
We understand that no further al;tions are required to continue the
above-referenced petition~. Consequently, representatives of Clarian Health Partners~ Inc. will
nO[ be present at the May 20, 2003 meeting.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact me at (317) 569-4680.
cc: Mr. Barry Evan;)
Mr. Boyd Zoccola
Ms. Judy Hagan
Mr. Greg Silvers
oSci:r ~
.Jt.t ,,{.(~ t+ ./
INIMAN27'1327vl
** TOTAL PAGE.02 **
MAY 18 2003
, ..
,.
2:55 PM FR BAKER D~NIELS 3 317 559 4800 TO 10842~22547~3281 P.01/02
U U
BAKER & DANIELS
600 East 96th Street, Suite 600, Indianapolis. Indiana 46240
317-569.9600 .. FAX 317-569-4800 .. www.bak.erdaniels,com
Indianapolis
Elkhart
Fort Wayne
WashingtOn, D,C,
South Bend
Qingdao, P.R. China
Facsimile Cover Letter
CONFIDENTIAUTV NonCE: THE MATERIALS IN THIS FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION ARE PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL AND
ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE SENDER. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE MATERIAL IS PRIVilEGED AND IS
INTENDED ONLY FOR THE use: OF THE INDIVIDUAL(S) NAMED BELOW. IF YOU ARE NOT THE; INTENDED RECIPIENT, BE
ADVISED THAT ANY UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE, COPYING, DISTRIBUTION OR THE TAKING OF ANY ACTION IN
RELIANCE ON THE CONTENTS OF THIS MATERIAL IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IFYOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS FACSIMILE
TRANSMtSSION IN ERROR, PLEAse IMMEDIATEl v NOTIFY US BY TELEPHONE TO ARRANGE FOR RETURN OF THE
fORWARDED DOCUMENTS TO US.
PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING PAGE(S) TO:
~
,. Mr. Jon Dobosiewicz
2. Barrett Evans
3. Boyd Zoccota
4. Ms. Judith F. Hagan
~
City of Carmel
Clarlan Health Partners/Jacobs
Hokanson Companies, Inc.
Clay Township Trustee
~
Phone N 9.
571-2426
962-6714
63308070
846-0744
962.3688
633-8081
846.2773
From:
Joseph M. Scimia
'\J
Comments:
\\t(
t,-\\ ....~
':'.~\
\>r-S~ ::,
,"
Date: May 19,2003
Return To: Marilyn Rees
Total Dlllm~r of pages, including Covel' lette..: 2
A hard copy of this transmission will be sent by regular mail
will be sent by overnight mail
x will not be sent under separate COVel."
IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES, PLEASE CALL THE
FAX DEPARTMENT AT 317-569~4888 AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
INIMAN2742AA4vl
MAR 25 '03 09:56AM
u
P.l/1
u
(>). ':),-"
h__) J....
< ^ --..::- - . .?; '-',
'(:)><r <._',::.'::::,:'~ I
:Kel1ton C. 'Ward, Sun.I('\Ior
i
"l'fi"II~ (17) 77b-S4:lS
(h1.l' IjJ.7J 17('-:1t1,;zS
J!lil~ ,Sf,
Olle :}{a/JIlltm, COll1lty SrJlIur(.
.7Ifo[,JI!$l)ill~. Imlilllw 4b(16o-.uJO
:-
American Consultin.g, Inc.
Attn: Jamie Poczekay. P.B.
7260 Shadeland Station
Indianapolis, IN 46256
VlA FACSIMILE: S43~0270
," <
,//'\ .'
,.-('"
t!,~,: . ;{'/f .-91(:1,,11
r" "";-f r /!/i
~\ <rf ''l/J
:A~ OO,..,~"
~" ("...0 tr
\..... u
~k
"(/'0
~/fJ
\
:~
.1
~~, ~/
,
Maroh 25. 2003
Ri:-",€]ariaii l'roftfi HdgnftAl
~ ,."."l'C,'\
c;l?
30'-D~'
Dear Jamie:
We have the following comments on your March] 9,2003 submission;
I. Submit the petition. non-enforcement, and bonds.
2, Submit a landscape plan. All plilJ1tinss need to be kept out of our easements.
Please can me with any questions at 776-8495. Thank you.
Sincerely.
~
Plan Reviewer
Cc: Carmel.Engineer
Carmel-DOCS -
Hamilton County Department of Soil Conservation Services
HamLlton County Highway Department
03/17103MON 13: 57 FAX 3176! \'91
'\...../
u
I4l 002
Members of the ExecutiVe Committee of the Plan Commission
Carmel'City Hall
One CMcSquare
Carmel, IN 46032
/~ - l'Jp'j
/3" orO~ J
f ' /
\' ~//../
~--~--
March 17, 2003
Dear Members of the Plan Commission.
We are home owners In the Spring Lake Estates neighborhood, just north of the propo~ect at the
northwest comer of 116lh Street and Meridian. We have several concerns regarding this project that we would
appreciate your consideration of prior to the Plan CommiSSion meeting in MarUI.
We have three primary areas of concern:
1. Illinois Street
On Clarian's plans, Illinois street is shown being completed right up to our neighborhOod property
and in line to run through existing residentiaIlots in Spring Lake Estates. we request that
I:l Illinois Street not be aligned to run through existing residential property, and
CI Illinois street on aarian property be truncated prior to the tree line to avoid unnecessary
destruction of woods since the exact location for future expansion of IKinois Street has not
yet been finalized.
2. Tree border on north end ofClarian project
OUf understanding is that Clarian intends to leave 100 feet of tree-Rne between ilie residential
property and their development. We request that
CI This footage be maximized as a oatural, existing, attractive blIffer between a residential
neighborhood and a highly commercial development
CI No walking trails be placed within this buffer zone to maird:ain neighborhood privacy
CI Additional space in Area 2-8 be designated as Tree Conservation as the homes on the
cul-de-sac will ~ most adversely impacted by the loss of woods, hospitalligl1t and noise,
the introduction of U1iilois street expansion, and the business proposed for placement in
Area 2-8.
3. Area 2-8
At the public meeting held by Clarian in January, Oarian representatives were proposing a Day
Care Center for Area 2-8. In the detailed C1anan North Hospital Campus PUD (January 17.2003.
page 11), severa! other options are also proposed. We request that
CI One of the alternative businesses be placed in Area 2-8 and that the Day Care placed in
another sight. Day Cares with outside play areas can be extremely noisy. We believe
the noise from a Day Care placed diredly behind our homes would adversely affect our
neighborhood quality of life. There is plenty of alternative space to locate this facility. and
those of us closest to the proposed lIlinDis street expansion with properties backing up to
the woods already stand to lose the most from this project In terms of substantial quality
of life and property value.
03/17/03 MON 13:57 FAX 3176~~91
u
141 003
March 17,2003
. Page 2
o The Plan Commission Committee members give special attention to location ofparkil19 in
Are3 2-8 and how those plans will affect headlight direction towams existing homes.
We sincerely appreciate your attention to our concerns. We have only been homeowners ill th[s neighborhood for:
7 mont11s and have serioUs concerns regarding potential changes in quality of life and property values in that short
period of tirne. il..Je chose to live in Carmel !:lased on its hi5t.0I)' of being sensitive to neighbortlood and business
appearances and the concerns of its residents.
Respectfully YOUl'S,
~
Jan arid Randall MiUer
325 Mallard Ccurt
Carmel, IN 46032
{3 '\ 7} 848-6416
lJ
u
March 16, 2003
Dear Member of Carmel Plan Commission:
We are writing as concerned homeowners in Spring Lake Estates. As you are aware,
the March 18 Carmel Plan Commission will hear information regarding the petition of
Clarion Hospital's proposed project for the Northwest corner of Merid ian and 116th
street. Spring Lake Estates is directly to the north of this property. Upon first learning of
this plan several months ago through the newspaper, we were quite relieved when a
Clarion source was quoted as saying that the existing woods would remain untouched.
The woods is between our neighborhood and the property. During attendance at the
January 8th public meeting with Clarion, we learned that th.e wood would be reduced to
100 feet of tree-line. This is less than one-fifth of the existing woods. We were told that
this was quite generous as the legal requirement is much less than this. We feel it is
important to have this assurance and others properly documented. As a neighborhood
we are concerned that the 100 feet of tree-line will not remain since Clarion will re-sell
the property not required for the hospital. Even though Clarion may feel it is
unreasonable to ask, we believe that keeping the entire woods intact would be a very
beneficial agreement for our neighborhood. Since the hospital will be a 24 hours/365
days a year operation, we ask that you empathize and consider the amount of privacy
and solitude we will be losing.
During the January public meeting it was also stated that there would be no access
roads to Springmill. However, the current PUD proposal discusses one major and two
minor access roads between Illinois and Springmill. The current property purchased by
Clarion that runs alon~ Springmill Road is zoned residential as are the surrounding
properties along Springmill. During the meeting we were told by Clarion that this
property was very expensive to buy (we alread knew that) and if the zoning is not
changed then the deal is off. We still want to ask that prior to making a decision, the
Planning Committee encourages cHscussions and potential compromises that will result
in maintaining the neighborhood feeling not only of Spring Lakes Estates; but also for
the residents and visitors driving along Springmill Road.
Lastly, a major concern is the expansion of Illinois street. The combination of these two
projects, if not handled with great care will negatively impact the quality of life of Spring
Lakes Estates residents and diminish the property value of our homes. We realize that
many important issues need to be considered. We appreciate your time and
consideration.
Sincerely,
Paul and Kathy Haag
u
u
One Civic Squ<lre
Cannel, IN .dC032
(317)571-2417
Fax: (317) 571-2426
Phone~
F~m: ~.
Pages: 7 A'~. ~.//./-t'..., J
Date! 3-/ ~ -0:.3
TO:~.~
Fax: ~? f -7' .!?tr:D
Re~
cc:
o Urgent
o Fo!" Review
o Please Comment 0 Please Reply
o please Recycle
u
u
~ 1 ;~ .~ - ~it~~,':~ ~<f1 \.~.~ ~l:'.~. ~(1: 'tt'~' ,: f .J ~t~,~ ',"''''~:
, ','CIT\tOF\ CARMEL\~" ;'~;"':~;
~:,(' b'e\; ~ ri~drit.~cj~;nmui1~:ser.vice~' ~;
~ '~~:;'~_~~!\':,'i.':: 1',"',';K'i.'i' ,::, I;;::?, .:';-.., ;-'"~,:,:-,;~,: :-;jf
One Civic Square
Carmel, IN 4$J32
(317) 571-2.4i7
Fax: (317) 571-2426
Fax
ClAO<J I ' ,
I TO~F ~
F;vc .!5{; 9- Y['(}V
phone:
From' ~~
Pages: Lj /f...?1.--C--!' C-z::.7X A
Date: __? -/0 -0 ~
Re:
cc:
o Urgent
o For Review 0 Please Comment 0 Please Reply
o Please Ref::ycle
;/ ~~ ~rY-"~ u;J~.3 -/J"-ii-3
u
u
Dobosiewicz7 Jon C
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Brewer, Scott I
Tuesday, February 18, 20037:29 PM ~ {t.--
Dobosiewicz, Jon C; Lillig, Laurence M _ \ ~ " ~
Tingley, Connie S O~ ~ ~..
?'
Dr
/u~
IJ-})
TAC urban Forestry notes I will not be in TAC due to the Indiana Urban Forest Council's Winter Meeting. We are hosting
at Village of West Clay.
Westwood Estates - Plans are ok
THe Anderson Corp- I have reviewed initial landscape and open space plans with David Barnes, but do not have a copy of
those plans yet. .
West Carmel Center, Block B, Lots 3&4, Block F - have only received Primary Plats, no other plans.
The Ridge at Hayden Run Sections 1&2 - plans ok
Clay Terrace - have met with Mr. Jang, but have not received final revised landscape plans yet.
Clari,m Hospital North - have reviewed plans, but review letter is not out yet.
11300 Block of North Michigan Road - Have not received any plans. This rezone should require open space plans
inclUding woodland analysis, and at least preliminary landscape plans. There is a substantial woodland at stake.
Cherry Creek Estates - Have reviewed the plans, but comment letter is not out yet.
Hazel Dell Corner Lot 1, The Overlook - initial comment letter has been faxed.
Treasure House - initial comment letter has been faxed.
Ritz Charles - initial comment letter has been faxed.
Scott Brewer
Urban Forester, City of Carmel
Department of Community Services
One Civic Square
Carmel, IN 46032
(317) 571-2478
1
.~"
u
u
t
Dobosiewicz, Jc:m C
Subject:
Andy Kern [Andy.Kem@ctrwd.org]
Tuesday, February 18, 2003 1 :56 PM
rfarrand@ccs.k12.in.us; AKeeling@cLcarmel.in.us; CTingley@cLcarmel.in.us;
DHill@cLcarmel.in.us; DPattyn@ci.carmel.in.us; Ghoyt@cLcarmel.in.us;
GStahl@ci.carmeLin;us; JBlanchard@cLcarmel.in.us; J Dobosiewicz@cLcarmel.in.us;
J Fahey@ci.carmel.in.us; J Kendall@cLcarmel.in.us; J P Foster@cLcarmel.in.us;
KHahn@ci.carmel.in.us; LLillig@cLcarmel.in.us; M Fogarty@cLcarmel.in.us;
MHollibaugh@ci.carmel.in.us;' MMcBride@ci.carmel.in.us; MSnyder@ci.carmel.in .us;
PMorrissey@cLcarmel.in.us; PPace@cLcarmel.in.us; RHancock@cLcarmel.in.us;
SBrewer@ci:carmel.in.us; slillard@ci.carmel.in.us; W Akers@ci.carmel.in.us;
Dean .Groves@Cinergy.COM; sprater@cmsenergy.com; sjb@co.hamilton.in.us;
stc@co.hamilton.in.us; Jay Alley; john-south@iaswcd.org;
jeffry Jarmer@timewarnercable.com; tskolak@usps.gov; CShupperd@vectren.com
Re: February 19 Carmel/Clay TAC Agenda S j) P
....~~ IJ.U-U
O~~. 7
From:
Sent:
To:
Hello everyone:
Following are CTRWD comments on e agenda items effecting our. sanitary sewers or service
area for the February 19, 200 ThC meeting. Please feel free to copy and distribute this
email or attach it to your eeting minutes. We have also created a new page on our
website linked to the "C struction" page where we have posted all CTRWD TAC conunents from
2001 and 2002 meetings eld to date. We will continue to add to this page every month so
please let everyone now they can view our comments online now too.
Westwood Estates' (Secondary Plat and Construction Plans)
The District has received the plans for this project. These plans have been reviewed and
forwarded to IDEM for permit approval.
The Anderson Corporation (Prima~y Plat)
The plans received by the District need to be revised to show labeled sewer profiles and
manhole, lateral and bedding details which are in accordance wiih District specifications.
The plans also need show the most recent version of the District specifications. Revised
plans need to be submitted. An IDEM permit will be required and the submittal packet
should be sent to the District for review. The District will then submit the project to
IDEM for permit approval. A preconstruction meeting will need to be held before the
construction of the proposed sanitary sewers. Building permits should NOT be issued
unless the District has issued connection permits.
The Ridge at Hayden Run, Sections One & Two (Secondary Plat and Construction Plans)
The plans received by the District have been reviewed and comments were sent to the
Project Engineer on February 10, 2003. Revised plans need to be submitted. An IDEM
permit will be required and the submittal packet should be sent to the District for
review. The District will then submit the project to IDEM for permit approval. A
preconstruct ion meeting will need to be held before the construction of the proposed
sanitary sewers. Building permits should NOT be issued unless the District has issued
connection permits.
Clarian Hospital North - (Rezone/Preliminary Development Plan and Final Development Plan
for Hospital site only)
The plans received by the District need to be revised to show the entire sanitary system
on the plan profile sheets as it is shown on the overall utility plan. Revised plans need
to be submitted. An IDEM permit will be required arid the submittal packet should be sent
to the District for review. The District will then submit the project to IDEM for permit
approval. A preconstruction meeting will need to be held before the construction of the
proposed sanitary sewers. Building permits should NOT be issued unless the District has
issued connection permits.
1
J
1.13Q.O Block of North MichigURoad (Rezone)
The District has not received any plans for this
issued unless the District has issued connection
u
~.
proposal. Building permits should NOT be
permits.
Ritz Charles (Amended Development Plan)
The District has not received any plans for this proposal. Building permits should NOT be
issued unless the District has issued connection permits.
Please remind all TAC applicants to provide plans directly to the District at our main
office address in care of Andy Kern at:
10701 N. College Ave., Suite A, Indianapolis, IN 46280~1098.
If there are questions about the District's requirements, then please refer to our website
for current information on the District's construction specification and permit standards.
We are a member of the rupps underground locate network so call 1-800-382-5544 before you
dig! Please feel free to contact Jay Alley or me if you have questions or need additional
information. Thanks!
Andy Kern, Project Specialist
Clay Township Regional Waste District
Hamilton County, IN, USA
http://www.ctrwd.org/
317-844-9200 (phone)
317-844-9203 (fax)
>>> "Dobosiewicz, Jon e" <JDobosiewicz@ci. carmel. in. us> 02/07/03 02: 21PM >>>
Please find attached the above referenced agenda.
<<TAC2003-0219.rtf>>
Thanks,
Jon C. Dobosiewicz
Planning Administrator
Department of Community Services
City of Carmel
One Civic Squfre
Carmel, IN 46032
Phone: 317.571.2417
Fax: 317.571.2426
jdobosiewicz@ci.carmel.in.us
2
.. ~;,.
0:1 / ) .,.,./ \
ERO'sfON AND SEDIMENT CONT . PLAN
TECHNICAL REVIEW AND COMMENT
Hamilton County Soil and Water Conservation District
11 08 South 9th Street, Noblesville IN 46060
Ph- 317-773-1432 or Email at john-south@iaswcd.org
PROJECT NAME:
Clari011 Northl--lospital
SUBMITTED BY
Clarian Health Partners
] 901 North Senate Avenue
Indianapolis, IN 46202
3 I 7-962-203 I
Jamie Poczekay
American Consulting
7260 Shadeland Station
I ndianapolis, IN 46256
. 0 IlDP
38- :J
REVIEWED BY:
John B. South P.E.
Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control
PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURE: Plan Review Date: 2/11/03
Acreage: 70 ac
LOCA nON: N. side of ] 16th Street on the west side of SR 3 I
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sec. 35
TOWNSHIP: 18N
RANGE: 3E
CiVIL TOWNSHIP: Clay
SOIL SURVEY MAP SHEET: 50
The technical review and comments are intended Lo evaluate the completeness of the erosion and sediment control planfor the
project The erosion and sediment control plan submitted was not reviewedfor the adequacy of the engineering design. All
practices included in the plan, as well as those recommended in the comments should be evaluaLed as to theirfeasibility hya
qualified individual with structural practices designed by a qualified engineer. The plan has not been reviewedfor local, sLaLe,
or federal permits that may be required toproceed with this project. Additional information, including design calculations may
be requesLed tufurlher e~valllate the erosion and sediment control plan
The erosion and sediment control plan has been reviewed and it has been determined that the plan:
Satisfies the minimum req uirements and intent of 3271AC 15-5 (RUle 5). Notification will be forwarded to the
Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
Refer to the comments section for additional information.
X Ooes not satisfy the minimum requirements and intent of 3271AC 15-5 (Rule 5); deficiencies are noted in the
checklist and in the comments section. Deficiencies constitute potential violations of the rule and must be
adequately addressed for compliance. The information necessary to satisfy the deficiencies must be submitted:
Pmper implementation of the erosion and sediment control plan and inspections of the construction site by the developer or a
representative are necessary to minimize offsite sedimentation The developer should be aware that unforeseen construction
activities and weather conditions may effectthe performance ofa practice or the erosion and sediment control plan The plan
must be aflexihle document, with provisions to modijj} or substitute practices as necessary.
Revised 4/97
PROJECT: Clarion North HospU
Page 2 of 3
Yes No
x lA
x 18
x IC
x 10
x IE
Yes No
x 2A
x 2B
x 2C
x 2D
u
ARE. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED ON THE PLANS?
(AU Plans Must Inc/ude Appropriate Legends, Scales, and North Arrow)
(Items that (lre Not Applicable to this Project are designated by NA)
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Location Map (Show project in relation to other areas D/the county)
Narrative Describing the Nature and Purpose oCthe Project
Location of Planned and/or Existing Roads, Utilities, Structures, Highways, etc.
Lot and/or Buildiug Locations
Landuse of Adjacent Areas
(Show the Entire Upstream Watershed and Adjacent Areas Within 500 Feel of the Property Lines)
TOPOGRAPHIC, DRAINAGE, AND GENERAL SITE FEATURES
Existing Vegetation (identify and Delinea/e )
Location and Name of All Wetlands, Lakes and Water Courses On and Adjacent to the Site
100 Year Floodplains,Floodway Fringes, and Floodways (Note if'None)
Soils Information (i/l~ydric soils ore present, it is the responsibility o//he owner/developer to
investigate the existence ofwetlands and to obtain permitsjhml the appropriate government agenCIes)
2E Existing and Planned Contours at an Interval Appropriate to Indicate Drainage Patterns
2F Locations of Specific Points Where Stormwater Discharge Will Leave the Site
2G Identify All Receiving Waters ( if Discharge is to a Separate Munic/jml Storm Sewer, Identify the
Name uf Ihe J\1unicipal Operator and the ULtimate Receiving If/aler)
2H Potential Areas Wbere Storm water May Enter Groundwater (Note if None)
21 Location of Stormwater System (Include Culverts, Sturm Sewers, Channels, and Swales)
x
X
X
X
X
Yes No
x
x
LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES
3A Location and AI}proximate Dimensions of All Disturbed Areas [i.e., Construction Limits]
(Areas Where Vege/atlve Cover Will Be Preserved Should be Clearly Designated)
3B Soil Stod.piles and or Borrow Areas (Show Locations or Note if'None)
Yes No
x 4A
X 48
x 4C
x 4D
x 4E
x 4F
x 4G
x 4H
X 41
N/A
X 4K
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES
Sequence of When Each Measure wm Be Implemented (Relmive to Earth Disturbing Activities)
Monitoring and Maintenance Cuidelines for Each Measure
Perimeter Sediment Control Measures (Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications)
Temporary Seeding (SfJecifications: Including Seed Mix, Fertilizer. Lime, .and Mulch Rale~)
Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Measures
(Location, ConstructIOn Detail, Dimensions, and Specifica1!ons)
Permanent Erosion and Sediment Control Measures
(Lucation, Construction Detai!, Dimensions, and Sf]ecijicali(}n.~)
Storm Drain .Inlet Protection (Loca/ion. Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications)
Stormwater Ontlet Protection (Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and :Speci(ica/ions)
Stable Construction Entrance (Low/ion, Construction Detail. Dimensions, and Specifications)
4J Erosion and Sediment Control on Individual Building Lots (SpecificatIOns)
Permanent Seeding (Specifications, Including Seed Mix, Fertilizer, Lime, and Mulch Rate.l)
Revised 4 I 97
() . .
ER()e-l0N AND SEDIMENT CONTRW PLAN
TECHNICAL REVIEW
COMMENTS
PROJECT: Clarion North Hospital
Page 3 of3
Note: All erosion ilml sediment control measures shown 011 the plans and referenced in fhis' review mw.t meet the design
criteria, stafldard~, and spec~ficatiolls outlined in the "Indiana HWldbook for Erosion Control in Developing Areas" from the
Indiana Department of Natural Resource.~, Division of Soil COIM'(!rvation or ,~imilar Guidance Do,cument.~.
1. The predominate soils ansite as mapped by the Hamilton County Soil Survey are:
Brookston silty clay loam- this soil is dark colored, silty in texture and on depressional uplands. It is deep and very poorly drained
with moderate permeability. It has high available water for plant growth and high organic matter content. It has compact till
starting at a depth of 40 to 60 inches. The main soil features that affect the urban development uses arc seasonal high water table,
high potential frost action, modcrate slirink-swell potential, moderate permeability and ponded surface water.
Crosby silt loam, 0-3 percent slopes- this soil is light colored, silty in texture and on sloping uplands. It is deep and somewhat
poorly drained with slow permeability.lt has high available water for plant growth and medium organic matter content. The soil
has compact till starting at a depth between 20 -40 inches. The main soil features that affect urban development uses are s"3sonal
high water table, moderate shrink-swell potential, high potential frost action and slow permeability.
2. The erosion control plan is a button up plan. Additional plans are needed on how this site will progress
from start to finish.
3. Please revise the notes on Sheet C6.4 to reflect this site.
4. Are wetlands located on this site?
5. The silt fence is inadequate for the size of the watershed. Pleasc design a sediment basin or other
appropriate practice. The design ofthe sediment basin should include calculations to verify the design.
Construction drawings should include elevations, contours, pipe sizes and construction specifications to
properly build the practice.
6. A seeding plan is needed for areas of the property not immediately impacted by construction.
7. Includc the sanitary construction in the erosion control plan.
8. The application of native plants for the bank treatment on one or both ponds could reduce maintenance
costs and potential geese problems.
9. Please address items on page 2 checked no.
Cc: Carmel DOCS
Ha. Co. Surveyor
Ha. Co. High\vay
File
---
"
u
u
HI(S
M. TERESA DAVIS AlA
VICE PRESIDENT
~
F[Jr~~I/lrD
'(.1'
DOCS
February 8, 2003
-- - - -
~...-----
../
./
?_ 03 /~
~
Mr. Jon Dobosiewicz
Carmel DOCS Office
One Civic Square
Carmel, Indiana 46032
Re: Clarian Health North Specialty I Women's and Children's Hospital
HKS Project Number 7867
Dear Mr. Dobosiewicz:
Per your request, following is a list of the differences between the original January 17 ADLS submittal and
the resubmittal of February 4:
1. The location and configuration of the north entrance into the site off of Illinois Avenue.
2. The location of the north section of the internal loop drive. It was moved 22 feet to the north.
/"
3. The configuration of the semi-circular parking area to the east of the MOB entrance. The new
configuration allows closer and more convenient parking to the MOB entrance.
4. The configuration of the ambulance drive and canopy. The revision allows better coverage of the
ambulance.
5. The relocation of the head-in parking paces adjacent to the southern pond. These spaces are now
added in the semi-circular parking area.
6. The reconfiguration of some remote parking spaces adjacent to the central plant.
7. The addition of sheet C4.2 and L7.01.
8. Further refinement of the plaza areas to the immediate north and south of the hospital, resulting in
less paving and more landscape.
9. Addition of a berm between the semi-circular drive and parking lot on the west, to better hide the
parking area.
10. Addition of some landscape features and fountains to further develop and soften the site.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 214-969-3004.
C:\TEMPlTemporary Inlemel Files\OLKC\MTD03020SCity.doc
HKS INC,
19H1 McKINNEY AVENUE
DALLAS, TX 75201-1753 214.969.5599 FAX 214.969.3397
"1
;::..
u
u
-,
.
Best Regards,
f '.
--r&~ Sa f;pU/~'
M. Teresa Davis, AlA
Vice President
cc: Ms. Jamie Poczekay, ACE
Mr. Roger Kilmer, B&D
Ms. Leah Hales, SW A
u
CC&Jrmeli
February 7, 2003
Jamie Poczekay
American Consulting, INC.
7260 Shadeland Station
Indianapolis, IN 46256-0270
RE: Clarian Health
Dear Ms. Poczekay:
u
J rvfY
~\) ~.0
I have received and reviewed the information for the above-mentioned
project.
At the present time, I see nothing in the plans that would hamper law
enforcement efforts.
If we can be of any further assistance to you, please contact us.
Respectfully
~F~~f~
Chief of Police
MDF:vb
cc: Dept. of Community Services
(.317) 571-2500
A Nationally
Agency
F';~ (317) 571-2512
~
RECF1VEO
FEB 11 ~Ca3
DOCS
FEE 07 '03 04:09PM
u
P.1/1
r\_ -,'1-"). .. < '
..,./,~._,j./ .>..L~
->.* ~.o"-._'-r.. I
C:J ,..- \.:.
February 7, 2003
:KentolfC. (Ward, SunJeyor
<Plione (J17) 776.84:'5
I'/-a.\' (Y7) 776-962~
Suitf J S8
Olle. ,1{omillc" C(WlHY SqlJf[l'~
,}/obbllillr, lr,ditWfI 4G\)(;O-1~:~ir
American Cl)ns\!lting. Inc.
Attn: Jamie Po~kIJY. P,E,
7260 Shadeland Station
ItldlilnllpOIiS. IN 462:56
VrA FACSIMILE; 317-543-0270
t-\~OJ
'?JV
/
::>0) I'
,
I-
I '
1-
h RFCF/I![D
fa 1 .~ ~~
t :It J'f
DocS
Re: Clarion North Hospital-US 31 and 116lh Street
Dear Jamie:
The following are comments 10 )lout construotlon plans and draine.ge Brl!llysis submitted on February 4, 2003:
l. Provide tile petition to make the storm sewers regulated.
2. Provide the non-enforcement permit wIth the appropriate fees.
3. Forward Brl enginee,r's estimate or copy Oflhc contract for 100% of the construction costs for storm sewers,
erosion control anci monuments and markers.
4, Submit tltigil'illJ lettGrs ofcrcdit or bonds for the e.\'IQve llm.OUfit9.
S. The Hamilton County S\l1"VeYQl"s Office hl1ll stRlldRrd details that are to be used. ~'hey are iVQilable at
www 9{~.l:1amil\on in LIS.
6. The storm sewers that will be regulated. (besides what you have: shown) arc: all pipes Into the ponds rhll.l come
from lIIinois Street.
7. Label all Inlets Brld outlets;
8. On the drainage plan. provide the pipe size, length, slope Brld 8!'proved rype Ofttlll.tcrial.
9, For both ponds, show the bottom elevation and the top of bank ol~vtltion.
10. Show a 15' e8$ernenl around the pondS eMn the top of bank.
1 J. Show the emergency ~pillwl:\Y and ovorflow route for the ponds.
12. Note the upstream off site acreage on the plans.
13. Note the adjacent landowners on the plans.
14. On !.he cnl:;ion control pion, add 8 nole that additional erosion control measures maybe required in the fie!d try the
Hamilton County Inspector.
15. Provide profiles of all fCigulated plpos that are listed ill number 711nd offhe ditch.
16. Addren the dl'liinage to Ihe west oflllinois Street. rn our meetirtg we: discu~ed having a pipe 10 the west of
lIIinoig Street to cllpt~re this area.
Sh(lUld you he,ve M)' questions please OOnt/ICt me: at 776-8495. Thank you.
cc: City ()fCl1fffiel-P.l111ineer, City l;lfCatm~I-Depllrtm~llt ofCommunlt;y Sm-lces
KllIl1lllon County Department of Soli Conser;alloll Services
l-IalTliJtc:m County. Highwl\Y lkpartmcnt
u
u
-)
One Civic Square
Carmel, IN 4E032
(317) 57i-~417
Fax: (317) 571-2426
~ . .
TO=rr ~ ;;/~/1U-~
Fax: 56'9-14'OD
From, 9::J
Pages:' ..3
L~ ~
< ./. r
Company: ~/ . .~
Date: 0;:;- 7~c:x..3
f . /J
RE: ~'=.) '4 C/ tl-4e---JL..~~LrJ
j
PROJECT: C~~
Pbone:
DOCKET NUMBER:
u
u
City of Carmel
Fire Department Headquarters
2 CIVIC SQUARE
CARMEL, INDIANA 46032
Voice (317) 571-2600 Fax (317) 571-2615
Fire Prevention Bureau
-:>Q
___u~
'3D
Jamie L. Poczekay EI, SIT
American Consulting, Inc.
7260 Shadeland Station
Indianapolis, IN 46256
RE: Clarian Health Hospital North
LETTER OF APPROVAL
The undersigned has reviewed the proposed plans for
Clarian Health Hospital
and has approved the plans subject to the following:
1. Our office requests a meeting to re-discussthe location of the fire department connection(s).
We are also requesting that an exterior entrance be provided to the riser room for our access.
2. We are requesting that the fire alarm enunciator panel be located at the main entrance of the
facility.
3. Our office is requesting a larger size sheet plan showing the overall site utility plans.
4. Is it known yet if the building will be required to have a fire pump?
5. As the building is over four stories in height, the building code will require a standpipe system in
the stairwells. We will also request that this system be expanded to include the underground-
parking garage if underground parking is still planned.
6. We are requesting the installations of Knox. boxes at key areas of the facility to be determined
once more detailed plans are available. Also we are requesting the purchase of Knox fire
department Connection caps for the system exterior hook-up(s). Applications for the Knox
products are available through our office.
Please respond to the above noted condition(s) in writing and submit to our office prior to the
scheduled Technical Advisory Meeting for this project.
Date: February 6. 2003
By: Gary Hoyt, Fire Marshal
Carmel Fire Department
... ......
u
u
One Civic Square
Carmel, IN 46J32
(317) 571.2417
Fax: (317) 571.2426
;:;:~- /"
To. ,:?~~c~o:---"
Fa:x: 669 -' ~f' 00
From:
Pages:
~~
t/.---
<....:5
Phone:
Date:
:LJ-
L. . =I-
Company: z.i..-~ . d---.Ir...-.:;~
DOCKET NUMEER:
RE:
PROJECT:
cX-~-6U
CC~IC-~
i.1
.
0"
u
u
City of Carmel
VIA FAX: 569-4800
Original by mail
February4, 2003
COpy
Joseph Scimia
Baker & Daniels
600 E. 96th Street, Suite 600
Indianapolis, IN 46240
RE: Clarian North Hospital POO Ordinance
Dear Mr. Scimia:
This letter is in response to the "new" Rezone and DP/ ADLS applications you have filed for Clarian North
Hospital. The following comments need to be addressed and/or plans/applications updated accordingly:
PUD Ordinance:
1. Approval Process:
a. The proposal is a Preliminary Development Plan for the entire parcel covered by the PUD,
not just area I-A and I-B.
b. The filing of the DP and ADLS for the Hospital constitutes the Final Development Plan for
Area I-A.
c. Amend the Administration section to require future approval of a Final Development Plan
and ADLS for all other parcels (area I-A on file now). Section 3.B and Administration
section of your PUD requests only ADLS for future parcels. This is not adequate.
d. Strike Section 3.B (iii). It should read that all Development within the PUD shall comply
with the development requirements of the PUD. Are you proposing something other than
this with the "substantial compliance" wording?
2. Area I-A:
a. We request a minilnum building height of 3 stories and 38' for area I-A. No minimum has
been proposed.
b. A 200' setback along US 31 far Hospital Building is excessive. Please reduce. Refer to
the 90' build-to-line in the US 31 Overlay Ordinance as guideline.
c. How should wOJ;'ds like "intended", "similar" and "generally" be viewed in the building
setback context as written. Please use language that leaves less room for interpretation.
This applies throughout the pun
d. The minimum building setback along Il61h Street should be greater than 20'. Based on the
proposal it could be 300+/-. If you want to guarantee the open buffer area along the street
at this location please revise setback.
e. Based on the other development standards I do not find it necessary to provide a minimum
lot width.
f. Based on the intent of area I-A the minimum ground floor area of 15,000 square feet
Page 1
ONE CIVIC SQUARE
CARNIEL, INDL\NA 46032
317/571-2417
.'
u
u
appears small with the exception of the physical plant. Please increase to a minimum of
30,000 s. f. and provide exception for physical plant, ifnecessary.
g.Based on your language in the F.A.R. section there is no point in providing one unless you
think that there is the potential that a 150' tall building from setback line to setback line
will be constructed with the adequate amount of parking within to meet the required
number. However, we do want to encourage the use of structure parking at this location.
You may want to establish a maximum FAR that guarantees structured parking if a future
expansion becomes a reality. The ultimate "highest and best" use of this property should
not include the proposed level of surface parking. If a parking structure is envisioned as
part of the future expansion you may want to give the Commission and COI.illcil an idea of
where it may be located.
h. Provide justification for not requiring a loading berth for a building ofles8 than 40,000 s.f.
In area.
3. Area l-B:
a. Based on the permitted uses could one reason that the hospital, in area I-A is not permitted
to include a fitness center or child care center. These uses may want to be included in area
I-A as accessory if provided within the hospital building:
b. We request a minimum building height of 3 stories (occupiable floors) and 38' for
buildings that do not front Illinois Street. No minimum has been proposed and a single
story is not acceptable.
c. We request a minimum building height of 2 stories (occupiable floors) and 26' for
buildings that front Illinois Street. No minimum has been proposed.
d. Based on setback requirement along illinois Street is it required that a lot with frontage on
illinois Street will have to have a building within 30' of the right-of-way?
e. Based on the other development standards I do not find it necessary to provide a minimum
lot width.
f. Again, your language in the F.A.R. section appears redundant based on other standards.
Letme say again that we want to encourage the use of structure parking. This area should
be restricted from becoming, exclusively, more surface parking to meet the requirement of
the hospital once it expands.
g. Provide justification for not requiring a loading berth for a building of less than 40,000 s.f.
10 area.
h. Strike second part of sign section and incorporate into first part. Splitting the language into
two sections is redundant and confusing.
4. Area 2-A:
a. Area 2-A could be eliminated in favor of moving requirements to Section V. on
Landscaping. The range in area is misleading at best. The space could be between 130' (to
made 3 acres) and 440' (for 10acres). This area is a 130'+/- buffer, with a trail no closer
that 100' to t)1e property line, between the residential to the north and the proposed uses
within areas 2-B, 2-C, and 2-D. lfyou intend to make it something more than that then
define it better. If you leave the language the way it is you will face the Plan Commission
when you come back with a plan that takes out seven acres of the woods for development
and only be able to tell them that the PUD ordinance language allows it.
5. Area 2-B:
a. Provide a larger minimum lot size and ground floor area more closely associated with the
proposed uses. If you feel it is necessary to keep these minimums please provide an exhibit
illustrating the minimum configuration for review.
b. Based on the proposed uses a minimum of 25,000 square feet seems more realistic. Even at
that we are not going for a outlot type situation. We want to see larger buildings with
multiple users.
Page 2
ONE CIVIC SQUARE
C"...Rc'vIEL, INDL'\NA 46032
317/571-2417
u
u
c. Section D.2j.4. provides standards for 200,000 plus s.f. building area. Is the size of area 2-
B (2-3 acres) adequate to acconnnodate uses this large? Please advise.
6. Area 2-C:
a. With buildings as large as proposed (minimum 10,000 s.f.) you may want greater flexibility
in building height. Perhaps 40+1- feet tall.
b. Good building size. Would like to see something closer to this for area 2-B.
7. Area 2-D:
a. Good standards on achieving mixed-use, larger buildings.
8. Area 2-E:
a. Based on the language and renderings within the Design Guideline section it appears the
development standards will not guarantee this type of construction and layout.
b. The typical outlot situation which could be created under these requirements is not
preferred. The lower building heights, combined with one acre lots could result in an outlot
situation.
9. Landscaping:
a. Stick with the per 100' standard as opposed to square footage as proposed in Section
V .E.3 .a. What you propose translates into 2 trees (l shade and 1 ornamental) and 5 shrubs
per 100 linear feet at a minimum 5' wide strip.
b. Change "Spring Mill Road, 116th Street" in Section V.E.3.b to all public right-of-way.
c. What are the required planting materials (units) within planting areas adjacent to Primary
Use buildings? None are specified.
d. Section V.H.1.e. calls out; "Interior Areas:" Is this an error/typo?
e. Be explicit that the planting strips are not cumulative. I assume that a parking area next to
a street will not need a 30'setback (two 15' planting strips, one for parking and the other
the front yard planting strip). Other areas of the Carmel Unified Development Ordinance
are cumulative.
10. Lighting:
a. Add restriction to read that require light standards within 90 feet of Spring Mill Road right-
of-way to be a maximum of fifteen (15) feet in height. This is consistent with US 31
Overlay requirements.
b. Move design related information into Section VII on Design Guidelines.
11. Design Guidelines: .
a. All of the renderings show two-three story buildings yet the text only requires 1 Y2 story
structures. Please revise. We request a minimum of two-story structures in area 2-D and 2-
E.
b. Request to see regulations added to address sign theme as well as building design.
12. Traffic / Roadway Improvements:
a. Provide a copy of the Traffic Study for review. Comments related to the study will be
made once received.
b. The right-of-way for Illinois Street is 120' pursuant to the Thoroughfare plan. A 120' full
width right-of-way is shown. It is my expectation that improvements will need to be made
within the right-of-way to provide dedicated left hand turn lanes into the site at each full-
access entrance in addition to the two thru lanes in each direction. Please revise plans
accordingly. In addition, sLreet trees and buffer plantings are required within the right-of-
way. Please provide these plans.
c. Access should be limited onto illinois Street. One additional access point on the west side
(other that than across from the two proposed cuts into the hospital) onto Illinois Street
would appear adequate. Revise language in Section VIII.A.3.b. to reflect this.
d. Revise Section VID.A.3 .a. to require access to be aligned with northem most hospital cut.
e. Add language to the above noted section restricting access to area I-B to the proposed
Page 3
ONE CIVIC SQUARE
CARlvIEL, INDLlliA 46032
317/571-2417
F ,
u
u
northern most hospital cut.
f. The right-of-way for Spring Mill Road is 100' pursuant to the Thoroughfare plan. Revise
plans accordingly to illustrate a 50' half.
g. We are requesting that a minimum of one public right of way (80' width) be provided
between lllinois Street and Spring Mill Road. It would seem practical that the street would
run between the main hospital entrance and a location somewhere within the middle 1/3 of
the site along Spring Mill Road as proposed.
h. Revise Section Vill.B.2.b. to allow no more that one such cut on either side ofthe major
interior access noted in the same section.
1. Revise Section Vill.B.2.d. to strike, "to Spring Mill Road," and to read Final Development
Plan as opposed to "ADLS".
J. The right-of-way for1l6lh Street is 150' pursuant to the Thoroughfare plan. A 70' half is
shown. Revise plans accordingly to illustrate a 75' half. We request a non-access
easement be provided along the frontage of the site abutting 116lh Street. Based on the
plans that we have seen from the state I hesitate to support the "emergency access"
proposed on 116111 Street. I think an alternative to this location would be along illinois
Street just north of the proposed pond along 116111 Street. This would eliminate the need to
come back and negotiate a change in the future in addition to the fact that you will have
west bound traffic on 116111 street trying to rum into the site via this entrance regardless
what it is signed. Please provide additional justification.
13. Other General Requirements:
a. Move this section into Section vn on Design Guidelines.
14. General:
a. Please forward a letter with a site plan of the proposed DP to the Corrunissioner of Indiana
Department of Transportation advising him of the proposal and requesting any comments.
If you have any questions or if! may be of assistance please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
L/~
/~~~ C. Dobosiewicz
Planning Administrator
Clarian North Hospital - Meridian.PUDl ,rtf
Page 4
ONE CIVIC SQUARE
CARLYffiL, INDLi\.NA 46032
317/571-2417