HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotebook: Info for Executive Summary
:~; 0~"~6Z-~ ;'StlJ^
".". "", i :'r<". f',>c.; ~<."'" ~~c~-':~. .."... i ", C
0_ \" "",; ~ ", . ",' '. ~lP~~cutJ;Vtl:~u~mar~i ,!WAf: ",. ',., ' .' 0';, ",
. 9.:':~F.;\?fll~a~fan/tQr"~d~t~,,~(:,~pjii:i,~,:~p;p~:~1$.j;~~},q~.
. . .:'..~/Bl?i~~~.~~l ~tJ;s~~:Ap"p~F!-V\~al.R~~qtl~:~l'z"
c "0 "'y::".,"_ "~O,~,,~. (../ .' ~ ~
~s;.ISi"
"'-",. ._"..
~. ""'.'" ".-~-~.;:;-'-'~-;_. '~.;.::;,."'. "'-~-' ~..
'.
u
u
Q/
PLANS AND DETAILS
CONSTRUCTION PLAN
SOUND LEVEL ASSESSMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
,r .'.
~
w
Plans and Details
w
o
l
~
c
.~
1:
c
-
CI.
C
C
C
Construction Plan
u
" ".' ~.....
," 0 ~ ;;
'114(lS' Ngrr:b 'F~e~-:arts~l~,a,li1ra: :stre.lit: ,
. * .~ : ~ ~:- . t _ '" " 0 ';",,";d ..., ~ ~ ~ -.::
- .... ,,-:;., ~t!~~~;:~$Q', ::, ',--; ';,,' -.,
, ",' ..;:..,.. I"";: ...j,.,"""" /i;O' ~:~ ..
CatrrH~' , ,IRulana' .,4u. . OJ;;.
:,' ~._ _--";''' '~Y" ~'-~.! ____.,- ""~ ;~~~. __-1,-";... ^ ~ ~. ." c , .
, "1 '.' ."
"lL'~C ,:
',,',
.!
" : "~4~~t!~h'Z01 2.(lO'$'
; "
'. . .
, ,"--- ~~ --""~ ~. --.:~_:.
, .
. ,
,,,o[~--"
,~,.2.::... ~ ~~~_, _
, ~'"
."-" "'-->'>-"'''~''--''' --- ",~.~
u
u
u
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF
APPLICATION FOR BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ACTION
SPECIAL USE APPROVAL REQUEST
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
INTRODUCTION ..... - . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,. I
327 lAC 15-5-6.5 (a)(1)
PROJECT NARRATIVE AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS .............. 1-1
327 lAC 15-5-6.5 (a)(2)
VICINITY MAP ..............,................,................. 2-1
327 lAC 15-5-6.5 (a)(3)
EXISTING PROJECT SITE LAYOUT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1
327 lAC 15-5-6.5 (a)(4)
FINAL PROJECT SITE LAYOUT ......,............... _ . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1
327 lAC 15-5-6.5 (a)(5)
GRADING PLAN. . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . 5-1
327 lAC 15-5-6.5 (a)(6)
DRAINAGE PLAN. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . , 6-1
MUELLER PROPERTY SOUTH SURFACE LIMESTONE
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN .................. ,_ . . . . . . 6-5
327 lAC 15-5-6.5 (a)(7)
STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ...................' 7-1
SPILL PREVENTION, CONTROL, AND COUNTERMEASURE PLAN ....... 7-9
327 lAC 15-5-6.5 (a)(8)
POSTCONSTRUCTION STORM WATER POLLUTION
PREVENTION PLAN. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-1
u
u
u
INTRODUCTION
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. has submitted a Special Use Application to the Board of
Zoning Appeals for an underground limestone operation. The property for which Special Use is
being sought is referred to in this report as, "Mueller Property South:' Although there will be no
land disturbance activities directly associated with this request, the requirements of Rule 5 still
apply since the proposed construction activity is part of a larger common plan of development (327
lAC 15-5-2 Sec. 2(a)(3)). The larger common plan of development would include the surface sand
and gravel operation which has already been approved by the Carmel-Clay Board of Zoning
Appeals for the Mueller Property South as well as the sutiace limestone operation which is
presently under review by the Board of Zoning Appeals for the same property.
This Construction Plan and associated documents have been prepared in order for Martin
Marietta Materials, Inc.'s (hereinafter referred to as Martin Marietta) erosion and sediment control
plan for the proposed Mueller Property South to meet the requirements of 327 lAC 15-5-6.5 (Rule
5), Storm Water Run-off Associated with Construction Activity. The following document and
enclosures address the requirements for construction plans as outlined in 327 lAC 15-5-6.5 (a).
This document is divided into eight sections consistent with the format of Sec. 6.5 (a) (1)
through (8). At the beginning of each section is the listing of the requirements for construction
plans for that section, along with Martin Marietta's response or reference (in bold type) to an
enclosure provided with this document.
- I -
.";
u
u
u
327 I C 15..5- .5 (a)(1)
PROJECT NARRATIVE AND
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
u
u
u
(1) Project narrative and supporting documents, including the following information:
(A) An index indicating the location, in the construction plans, of all information required by
this subsection.
A Table of Contents of all information required by this subsection is located
at the front of this Construction Plan.
(B) Description of the nature and purpose of the project.
See Page 1-2.
(C) Legal description of the project site. The description should be to the nearest quarter
section, township, and range, and include the civil township.
See Page 1-3.
(D) Soil properties, characteristics, limitations, and hazards associated with the project site
and the measures that will be integrated into the project to overcome or minimize adverse
soil conditions.
See Page 1-4.
(E) General construction sequence of how the project site will be built, including phases of
construction.
See Page 1.5.
(F) Hydrologic Unit Code (14 Digit) available from the United States Geological Survey
(USGS).
See Page 1-7.
(G) A reduced plat or project site map showing the lot numbers, lot boundaries, and road
layout and names. The reduced map must be legible and submitted on a sheet or sheets
no larger than eleven (11) inches by seventeen (17) inches for all phases or sections of the
project site.
See Page 1-8.
(H) Identification of any other state or federal water quality permits that are required for
construction activities associated with the owner's project site.
See Page 1-9.
1-1
u
u
u
Description of the Nature and Purpose of the Project
Martin Marietta has requested a Special Use Approval from the Carmel-Clay Board of Zoning
Appeals for underground limestone extraction on a 96.921-acre tract south of 1 06th Street between
Gray Road and Hazel Dell Parkway in the City of Carmel, Hamilton County, Indiana. The property
for which Special Use is being sought is referred to in this report as, "Mueller Property South."
Martin Marietta is seeking approval to conduct an underground limestone operation on the Mueller
Property South by expanding its existing adjacent (to the south) underground mine.
Martin Marietta will employ the room-and-pillar underground mining method to extract limestone.
This method of mining consists of leaving large pillars of limestone to support the roof and overlying
strata, where the mined-out portions of the operation are referred to as the "rooms" or entries.
Entry widths are estimated to be 45 feet. Approximate pillar dimensions are estimated at 45 feet
long by 45 feet wide by 25 to 88 feet tall. The mine will have several operating levels beginning
at approximately 560 feet mean sea level and continuing down to over 900 feet below ground
surface (approximately -202 feet mean sea level). The room and pillar system that is being
proposed will prevent any surface subsidence. Sufficient lateral support will be provided to be safe
with respect to hazards to persons; physical damage to adjacent land or improvements; and
damage to any trees, sidewalks, parking areas, or utility by reason of slides, sinking, or collapses.
The underground mine will be accessed via existing Martin Marietta workings adjacent to the south
which are part of the North Indianapolis Plant's underground mine. A surface sand and gravel
operation has already been approved by the Carmel-Clay Board of Zoning Appeals for Mueller
Property South (approval number 04040024SU), and an application for a surface limestone
operation for the same su bject property is currently under review. A description of the interrelation-
ships among these three operations is provided on Page 1-5.
1-2
u
u
u
legal Description
Part of the North Half of Section 9, Township 17 North, Range 4 East of the Second Principal
Meridian in Clay Township, Hamilton County, Indiana, described as follows:
Commencing at the Northwest corner of Section 9, Township 17 North, Range 4 East of the
Second Principal Meridian in Clay Township, Hamilton County, Indiana; thence South 89 degrees
55 minutes 56 seconds East (assumed bearing) on the North line of said Section 9, a distance of
1,336.18 feet to the Northwest corner of the East Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 9,
said corner being the PLACE OF BEGINNING of the within described real estate; thence South 00
degrees 11 minutes 12 seconds West on the West line of said East Half 1,716.00 feet; thence
South 89 degrees 55 minutes 56 seconds East parallel with the North line of said Section 9, a
distance of 1,336.01 feet to the West line of the East Half of said Section 9; thence South 00
degrees 11 minutes 33 seconds West on the West line of said East Half 156.75 feet; thence South
89 degrees 55 minutes 56 seconds East parallel with the North line of said Section 9, a distance
of 919.68 feet to the Westerly line of real estate conveyed to the City of Carmel, Indiana, by a
documented titled (Certification of Clerk( recorded in the Office of the Recorder of Hamilton County,
Indiana, as Instrument Number 9709754848 (the following eight courses being on the Westerly line
of said real estate); 1.) thence North OS degrees 36 minutes 31 seconds East 885.22 feet; 2.)
thence North 02 degrees 53 minutes 53 seconds East 201.00 feet; 3.) thence North 08 degrees
36 minutes 31 seconds East 660.61 feet; 4.) thence North 29 degrees 48 minutes 29 seconds
West 55.59 feet; 5.) thence North 80 degrees 51 minutes 37 seconds West 303.34 feet; 6.) thence
North S9 degrees 03 minutes 10 seconds West 148.00 feet; 7.) thence North 60 degrees 14
minutes 56 seconds West 57.55 feet; 8.) thence North 00 degrees 04 minutes 04 seconds East
16.50 feet to the North line of said Section 9, said point being 3,302.24 feet South 89 degrees 55
minutes 56 seconds East of the Southwest corner of said Section 9; thence North 89 degrees 55
minutes 56 seconds West on said North line 1,966.06 feet to the place of beginning, containing
96.921 acres, more or less.
Approximate coordinates at the center of the site are as follows:
39056'19" N latitude
86004'54" W longitude
1-3
Soil Information
u
Although no land disturbance activities are proposed as part of this Special Use Approval Request,
this soil information is provided for informational purposes. There are five soil types present on the
Mueller Property South, as indicated on the Soils Map located on Page 3-3 of this Construction
Plan. These soils include Ockley Silt Loam, Fox Clay Loam, Fox Loam, and Wetland Silty Clay
Loam. Below is a brief description of each of the soil types.
Ockley Silt Loam (OcA)
(l) 0 to 2 percent slopes
o Well drained soil
@ Surface layer dark, yellowish brown silt loam, about 10 inches thick
f) Subsoil 46 inches thick
(j) Moderate permeability; slow surface runoff
Ocklev Silt Loam (OcB2)
o 2 to 6 percent slopes
C9 Well drained soil
. Surface layer dark, yellowish brown silt loam, about 7 inches thick
3 Subsoil 39 inches thick
It Moderate permeability; surface runoff medium
u
Fox Clay Loam (FxC3)
& 8 to 18 percent slopes, severely eroded
o Well drained
e Surface layer dark brown clay loam, about 7 inches thick
$ Subsoil 21 inches thick
flI Moderate permeability in the subsoil and rapid in the underlying material; surface
runoff is medium
Wetland Silty Clay Loam (We)
01 Nearly level slopes
(9 Very poorly drained
e Surface layer very dark gray silty clay loam, about 9 inches thick
o Subsoil 30 inches thick
QI Slow permeability with water table at or near the surface
Fox Loam (FnAl
ca 0 to 2 percent slopes, eroded
tal Well drained
e Surface layer dark brown loam about 6 inches thick
lD Subsoil 30 inches thick
e Permeability IS moderate in subsoil and rapid in underlying material; surface runoff
is medium
There are no soil properties or characteristics that limit or pose a hazard for development of the
property in the proposed manner. According to the Soil Survey of Hamilton County, the existence
of some of the listed soils is associated with the presence of sand and gravel.
u
1-4
u
u
u
General Construction Sequence
and Explanation of Interrelationship among Mueller Property South Sand and Gravel,
South Surface Limestone, and South Underground Limestone
(for Larger Common Plan of Development for Mueller Property South)
1.
Prior to earth disturbance activities, appropriate erosion and sedimentation controls will be
in place to prevent sediment from leaving the subject property (note that several basins, silt
fencing, and other control measures are already in-place and functional). See Mueller
Property South Surface Limestone Operation Erosion and Sediment Control Report located
on Page 6-5 of this Construction Plan for details.
2.
Following BZA approval for Mueller Property South Surface Limestone Operation, initiate
overburden removal on property south of existing Blue Woods Creek.
3.
Initiate relocation of Blue Woods Creek. Install appropriate erosion and sediment controls
as per Mueller Property South Surface Limestone Operation Erosion and Sediment Control
Report located on Page 6-5 of this Construction Plan (See Erosion and Sediment Control
Plan After Stream Relocation)
4.
Continue excavating overburden down to sand and gravel reserves south of Blue Woods
Creek. In conjunction with overburden removal, property berms would be established in
areas where they do not exist, and finished where started.
5.
Dewater sand and gravel deposit. This is expected to occur naturally as water will drain
south towards the existing adjacent North Indianapolis pit for pumping to existing settling
ponds.
6. Seed all affected areas to be vegetated that are not active mining areas as soon as final
grade is attained.
7. Temporary erosion and sediment controls, such as the rock filter or silt fences will remain
in place until the contributing drainage areas are stabilized. These controls may be
removed after the upslope areas are vegetated (in the case of silt fence) or the drainage
area is eliminated by the progression of mining activities (in the case of the rock filter).
8. After dewatering has occurred, mining of sand and gravel materials will commence.
9. Reclamation will be completed concurrently with mining by establishing the final grade with
slopes no steeper than 3 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) down to the first limestone bench
(approximately 710' +/- MSL). These slopes will be seeded once final grading has been
achieved.
10. As sand and gravel extraction is completed in certain areas, surface limestone extraction
will commence in those areas. Therefore, sand and gravel extraction and surface
limestone extraction will occur simultaneously.
11.
All slopes that have not yet been final graded will be graded and seeded prior to completion
of surface limestone mining. Site will be revegetated in accordance with the plans as
described on Figure 3, Erosion and Sedimentation Control and Planting Plan - Post Mining,
1-5
u
u
u
12.
which is contained in the Mueller Property South Surface Limestone Operation Erosion and
Sediment Control Report, located on Page 6-5 of this Construction Plan.
Underground limestone mining may, at some point in the mine life, operate concurrently
with active surface operations. Such would only occur after adequate development and
expansion of the surface operations. It is also possible that underground mining will not
begin until after the completion of surface mining operations, Concurrent mining
operations, if occurring, will be coordinated in a manner to promote safe, efficient
operations. Therefore, pumping of the water from the open pit will continue throughout the
duration of the underground mine life to maintain dry operating conditions.
13.
Martin Marietta will employ the room-and-pillar underground mining method to extract
limestone. This method of mining consists of leaving large pillars of limestone to support
the roof and overlying strata, where the mined-out portions of the operation are referred to
as the "rooms" or entries. Entry widths are estimated to be 45 feet. Approximate pillar
dimensions are estimated at 45 feet long by 45 feet wide by 25 to 88 feet tall. The mine will
have several operating levels beginning at approximately 560 feet mean sea level and
continuing down to over 900 feet below ground surface (approximately -202 feet mean sea
level). The room and pillar system that is being proposed will prevent any surface
subsidence. Sufficient lateral support will be provided to be safe with respect to hazards
to persons; physical damage to adjacent land or improvements; and damage to any trees,
sidewalks, parking areas, or utility by reason of slides, sinking, or collapses.
14.
Following cessation of all mining activities, the pit will be allowed to fill with water for final
land use as an artificial lake.
1-6
u
u
u
Hydrologic Unit Code
Mueller Property South is located within the HUC14 Watershed Boundary identified by the United
States Geological Survey (USGS) as 05120201090040.
1-7
,;".
LEGEND
///////////////// Mueller Property South
- - - - - Existing Rood
Tax Parcels
NOTE: THE PROPERTY LINE INFORMA TlON PORTRAYED ON THIS
MAP IS AN APPROXIMATE REPRESENTATION BASED ON DATA
PROVIDED FROM THE HAMIL TON COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENT AND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY SURVEYS FOR THE E. & H. MUELLER
DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C. PROPERTlES.
E. 106TH ST.
II
E. & H. MUELLER DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C.
(MUELLER PROPERTY SOUTH)
TAX PARCEL NO.
17-14-09-00-00-003.000
'0
I
0'
1-8
Scale
400'
I
II
I
I I
II,E. & H. MUELLER DEVELOPMEN\".
c::i (MUELLER PROPERTY SOUTH)
Q:: II TAX PARCEL NO.
~ ::'7-,4-09_00-00_003.000
II
I
j
o
...w.. .....~......~
/
/
I
/
I
,
I
I
!
I
/
I
I
I
I
I
/
I
I
FILE NAME: North S&G.DWG
,
800'
D.6,TE
R~ISI:;)N
ISSUED
n
Martin Marietta Materials, IneM
Mueller Property South
Underground Limestone Operation
Construction Plan
DW\'.IG.N0:
REDUCED PROJECT SITE MAP
rn.'YN BV: OAT::
D. Johnston 3/20/08
CK. BY: SCA.Le;
L. Berra 1" = 400'
SHEET NO.'
JOB. NO.
R08-DOlO
u
u
u
Water Discharge
Type:
Number:
Issuing agency:
Other Required State and Federal Water Quality Permits
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPOES), or Rule 12
Permit (327 lAC 15-12)
ING490012
Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Water Quality
(I DEM - OWQ)
Note the following permits are associated with the already-approved sand and gravel operation and
the surface limestone operation which is pending approval.
Blue Woods Creek Relocation
Type: Section 404 permit
10 Number: 20050009S-jea
Issuing agency: Corps of Engineers (COE)
Type:
10 Number:
Issuing agency:
Type:
Number:
Issuing agency:
Type:
Drain name:
Number:
Issuing agency:
Section 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC) permit
200 1-284-29-LPR~A
Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Water Quality
(IDEM - OWQ)
Construction in a Floodway
FW-21136
Indiana Department of Natural Resources (ION R or DNR) I Division of Water
Petition for Relocation and Construction of legal drain
Moffit-Williamson Drain
(Not yet obtained)
Hamilton County Surveyor
1-9
?
.J
~
3271
u
~
.~
(">.
~
.-
~
if
"'
.
.U'
,
It
..-'
. .(.;
<1
I"-
.(".
(i
/r
15om5m ". ( )(2)
VICINiTY MAP
'u
u
u
(2) Vicinity map depicting the project site location in relationship to recognizable local landmarks,
towns, and major roads, such as a USGS topographic quadrangle map or county or municipal road
map.
See attached Vicinity Map on Page 2-2.
2-1
/
/
) :AI'
fUy':
____...1.._--
-----.-.....~ 1..1":.-"
'.....
NGE
Martin Marietta Materials, IneM
Mueller Property South
Underground Limestone Operation
Construction Plan
VICINITY MAP
Source: USGS 7.5' Quadrangle, Fishers, Indiana
Photorevised 1988
:JWW BY;
D. Johnston
CK8V:
L. Berra
CA.n;:
3/20108
OWNG. NO:
JOB. NO.
R08-DOlO
SCALE.
1" = 2000'
SHEET NO. .
2-2
211C 15m5om6.5 (a)(3)
) EXISTING PROJECT SiTE LAYOUT
~
\'
o~j
"~'I
,~ <'~~
~<li!
,'f.(>. :1'
,. ," ~ ,
:.~ :1
~fb'",
,-,CT;'" ,I
'0'"1
~,;
':--' I
'N','
<$ 1
>> . '-.1
, ::--1
u
v
u
(3) An existing project site layout that must include the following information:
(A) Location and name of all wetlands, lakes, and water courses on or adjacent to the
project site.
See Project Site Layout on Page 3-2. Note that a Wetland Delineation Report
was completed by J.F. New & Associates, Inc. for the Mueller Property South and
surrounding areas. No wetlands were found to exist on Mueller Property South. One
wetland and two jurisdictional waters of the U.S. were identified near the property.
These features are indicated on the Project Site Layout.
(6) Location of all existing structures on the project site.
Existing structures are identified on the Project Site Layout on Page 3-2.
(C) One hundred (100) year floodplains, floodway fringes, and floodways, Please note if
none exists.
See Project Site Layout on Page 3-2 for locations.
(D) Soil map of the predominant soil types, as determined by the United States Department
of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Survey, or an
equivalent publication, or as determined by a soil scientist. A soil legend must be included
with the soil map.
See Soils Map on Page 3-3.
(E) Identification and delineation of vegetative cover, such as grass, weeds, brush, and
trees, on the project site.
See Project Site Layout on Page 3-2.
(F) Land use of all adjacent properties.
See Project Site Layout on Page 3-2.
(G) Existing topography at a contour interval appropriate to indicate drainage patterns.
See Project Site Layout on Page 3.2.
3-1
---------
OcA
w
pt
FnA
OcA
Source: Soil Surve of Hamilton Count, Indiana
LEGEN D
Martin Marietta Materials, 'neM
Mueller Property Boundary
_ _ _ Mueller South Permit Boundary
Soil Boundary
OcB2
FxC3
Mueller Property South
Underground Limestone Operation
Construction Plan
Ockley Silt Loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded
Fox Clay Loam, 8 to 18 percent slopes. severely
eroded
OcA - Ockley Silt Loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
We - Wetland Silty Clay Loam
FnA - Fox Loom, 0 to 2 percent slopes
SOILS MAP
OWNS"':
D. Johnston
DATE:
0'r\NG, NO;
JOB. NO.
ROB-DOlO
3/20/08
CK B":
L. Berra
SCAU;.:
1. " 500'
SHEET 1oK>,'
3- 3 I~r,:.::.' a.!i.. ~.:'!I'I!: I~ -,3:,5: MOl Jr:~ '-~\.[1Df elm ~.. ~~ tit,::. 11111 l'1WNf "lIIlte ....
u
u
\
327 lAC 15."5.,,. .5 (a)(4)
u FINAL PROJECT SITE LAYOUT
11
u
u
u
(4) Final project site layout, including the following information:
(A) Location of all proposed site improvements, including roads, utilities, lot delineation and
identification, proposed structures, and common areas.
Upon cessation of mining activity, operating and processing equipment will
be removed from the subsurface and disposed of in accordance with appropriate
regulations. There will be no changes to the land surface associated with the
underground mining operation, either during mining orfollowing cessation ofmining
activity. The final project site layout will be reflective of the already-approved sand
and gravel operation and the surface limestone operation currently under review.
See Final Project Site Layout on Page 4-2 for the final project site layout assuming
that the surface limestone operation is approved for the subject site.
(8) One hundred (100) year floodplains, floodway fringes, and floodways. Please note if
none exists.
The final 1 DO-year floodplain will be confined within the banks ofthe relocated
Blue Woods Creek, as associated with the two surface operations for the subject
site. See Note NO.5 on Final Project Site Layout on Page 4-2.
(C) Proposed final topography at a contour interval appropriate to indicate drainage
patterns.
There will be no changes to the topography associated with the underground
mining operation, either during mining or following cessation of mining activity. The
final project site layout will be reflective of the already-approved sand and gravel
operation and the surface limestone operation currently under review. See Final
Project Site Layout on Page 4-2 for the final project site layout assuming that the
surface limestone operation is approved for the subject site. See Final Project Site
Layout on Page 4-2.
4-1
)
J
~
,~1
,~.
~'~~
327 I C 15...5...6.5 (a){5) ....~
"
.J GRADING PLAN "S,:
~'
, '!,-,
, {~
~ 0;-:'---
u
u
u
(5) A grading plan, including the following information:
(A) Delineation of all proposed land disturbing activities, including off-site activities that will
provide services to the project site.
There will be no proposed land disturbing activities associated with the
underground mining operation. The grading plan for the surface will be reflective of
the already-approved sand and gravel operation and the surface limestone operation
currently under review. See Grading Plan on Page 5-2 forthe grading plan assuming
that the surface limestone operation is approved for the subject site.
(8) Location of all soil stockpiles and borrow areas.
There will be no soil stockpiles or borrow areas associated with the
underground operation proposed. All materials extracted at the underground
operation will be processed for product sale.
Regarding the affiliated sand and gravel and surface limestone operations,
topsoil will be extracted and stored during overburden removal activities. Excess
overburden materials will either be used to construct permanent berms or removed
from the site.
(C) Information regarding any off-site borrow, stockpile, or disposal areas that are
associated with a project site and under the control of the project site owner.
No off.site borrow, stockpile, or disposal areas are associated with the
underground operation being proposed. Referto Note No.6 on Grading Planlocated
on Page 5-2 with respect to the affiliated surface operations.
(D) Existing and proposed topographic information.
No changes to the existing topography are proposed as part of the under-
ground operation. The existing contours depicted on the Grading Plan were
extracted from the Hamilton County GIS Department.
5-1
u
u
327 I C 15~ m> .5 ( )(6)
u DRAINAGE PLAN
u
u
u
(6) A drainage plan, including the following information:
(A) An estimate of the peak discharge, based on the ten (10) year storm event, of the
project site for both preconstruction and postconstruction conditions.
The peak discharge based on the 10 year storm event for the project site
would be the same for pre- and post-construction conditions associated with the
underground operation (see Page 6-2 for the preconstruction peak discharge
estimate, which would be applicable under both conditions) since the mineral
extraction operations are contained underground. See Pages 6-2 through 6-4 for
peak discharge estimates associated with the surface operations for the subject site.
(B) Location, size, and dimensions of all storm water drainage systems, such as culverts,
storm sewers, and conveyance channels.
Surface water does not pertain to the planned operations for the subject
property as the mineral extraction operations are contained underground.
Encountered g.roundwater will be collected in sumps and pumped from the mine to
currently existing clarification ponds on adjoining Martin Marietta property.
The proposed drai nage systems were designed for the purpose of erosion and
sediment control, which are not applicable to the underground operation, but are
applicable to the approved sand and gravel and proposed surface limestone
operation. Their locations, sizes, and dimensions may be found in the attached
"Mueller Property South Surface Limestone Operation Erosion and Sediment Control
Report" on Page 6-5.
(C) Locations where storm water may be directly discharged into ground water, such as
abandoned wells or sinkholes. Please note if none exists.
There are no known locations where storm water may be directly discharged
into ground water, such as abandoned wells or sinkholes. The only means of storm
water entering the ground water at this site will be via infiltration.
(D) Locations of specific points where storm water discharge will leave the project site.
In accordance with the previously referenced and attached Mueller Property
South Surface Limestone Operation Erosion and Sediment Control Report, storm
water may leave the site via Blue Woods Creek (existing or relocated).
(E) Name of all receiving waters. If the discharge is to a separate municipal storm sewer,
identify the name of the municipal operator and the ultimate receiving water.
As previously mentioned, the receiving waters include Blue Woods Creek (this
is also a legal drain that is known as the Moffit and Williamson Drain), and ultimately,
Wh ite River.
(F) Location, size, and dimensions of features, such as permanent retention or detention
facilities, including existing or man made wetlands, used for the purpose of storm water
management.
N/A.
6-1
KELLV P-.N1oL<O'VS1 BlNIC.
E"-I-G-I......-.::;:EA9. CCII.....SLlL..,.......,.,NTIElI
2601 NORTH FRONT STREET
HARRISBURG,PENNSYLVANIA 17110
U (717) 232..{)593 · 800-892-6532
. . FAX (717) 232~ 1799
Subject /o-FeC1.f' S'fOrm p-eaJ oi,'sdat-CI€
Mb/hn ~{OJ! tH-ct M utlLd J?t'tlp1{?, SoLi tv!
pYE..(?OJ154"tUbh'&tt
Job No.. ~ 0 ,) t~! .;:'" ';;
Computed by \'--'\~
Sheet No. -L of --&-
Drawing No.
Date 4/,q/04-
,
Checked by
6erre C6Ylh't1V\.U\1~PY1 I +h.t..fWD <;"ub- WGl1-.erslreds 011 -fad\- <k~ Gt "i-k Cf<e~ ofr(J..~'n 1-0
.+J..-e. Cr~e~ 1~ 'Peak G11'-Schft~e r\ ('JevlMed W- ~ propuQ'd rock f;.l~r r-/ur.
! 0 - ~ ell;' ~-tD ('TII
80::: Lf.d'
OtY;~ "Sott ~1&vf ~ C
t} r (J~M I CVt-J , vJ -:= 7 f
_ 1&00 . I 66'
s - 19 -10 =- 9.b6 III ~ 0.;:; Yd. ~ 0,53
P ~ L
Q== (-:LA) _ (4<7--0.53)
q.2 -1" 0, 8 x r;. 6-6
p-+ 0.8 -5
N /!! rtk IA.}eST ~ ",b- UJO!1f.ersheD/
u
d - 'j€ D.Jr Yet) '1i'll-tt
f{:r ~ -i J
0.8
T -t;::- eM' 07 ('11- )
(p~)'5 SO-if
shaJiolV <0VLter~ro..+.ec1 -r~
~ h.fA2:t fI ew
D- 5 j '5 {ore- V -:: os f+ /s
L -=:: /01 DO A
J
I
=- 8../3
7 ( "'.8
~.O() (J.tS x ;-0)
'1 q ".S o,Q>
ex. I X ".005
:::. (J./7 hr
I.:) [J 0
,. t: 0.67 fir
I =. oS >( 3600 ~
u
~.ft~ fI&~j
Ul,.~(~ h(jeJ,'rcwJ,\Cr
V:= {, I.t 9 r ~ $" 1/,
t1
n~)\I.~..A, -::: I r I
- ,,,,",
I
I
l -::.:;;; 60
;-
_ /, lf9 Y IS "A '(1J.oo5 vi
- -
0,0';0
T.....:;c
Iv
~~(JO
If, b ~ ~ 6 c 0
;::. (). /3 h y-
4, 6 ~/.5
6-2
KELLV A,.....oLOlI"V'51 I.....C-
ENall'\o.ll;;OlEs::I5. c::::IDiI"tr.lG.........Tp...,...,..."..'S
Subject 10 - '1 (of s hi ((I r (a \L d u( h ui LJLJOb No. I U OJ)' ;}.1
(~~~;hn !vtcUJ.IW. nL,U.1JJr Pr'1?i{1'SIlJct'h SheetNo.~ofL
C (t l u'd rft..li ho'1 Drawing No.
com~uted by r\ 'J.. 5 Checked by Date f II f 10 4-
2601 NORTH FRONT STREET
HARRISBURG,PENNSYLVANlA 17110
U,', (717) 232-0593 0 800-892-6532
FAX (711) 232-1799
Tc = 1. Ti: ~ {)./7 + 0.67 -rO,/3 =- {),17
-,
..
.:....<J.
p"::.-
r ~ ! u. ::: 340 (:<; /"/1\1'\
19.53
q,L
::: 0./3
A-)t'I -;:. 3 ~ it(. -:=.; 0,0 6()~ '7/1,'"
6p ~ &-v.AI'l1 Q ::::: 340 x a.O 6()~)l( ;;:./3 ~
44- (Js
!
r ~ow{,,-M1- s~ - /Ajaf.er5hed
5 hf:e.+ fI {n.lJ
T-t' = 0'; 7 hr
w/
'5 W) (iN c(}~~d r (~
3) -slcpe V:::/,2t/6
L.,,: 4-0 0 tr
I
---rl-t::;: LfCiO ~IO l
- =-- O,v'/ fir
j,CJ K '36(10
d~' -roW
V -::: If, b fr Is
L ::= (ODe?
lo~'o - (:).06 hr
T-t: ~ 4,6 X "3boo
Ie:::' c./7-+-().OY -(- ~,ob =7 6q~
"I ~,
\ =/
J
b-IA ~ 6 50 e5(h~1Yl
1{~ ;:; 0, /3
A ;: /5 Il,~' D' :J" ,I . l
'01'1 r\..l-.- - (). ();, r.r J-r;:
u~
b-r' ::: ~>A A rt1 (2. =: 650 X o.0c934-- X r9. ./3 =::; :;d ~5
, '
J;1.f! y ~1P24 ok~ Ji fl ,J.e fi.. 'rt'I. _I: ,r:'t' kK f' ~-'() itJj'- 11.11 -t - r. - ( / ep
CVLY~--' C 1"Vli'. f".... ; '1"''-1""" '3~ ~ -r; ~'".
,-I \ I . -
6-3
LJ
u
u)
Subject M ud!L1 PfDptlh 5QUf'r!
I
o OS t- - (',on'! r-rUch-:;/,~t 0 to IL
, J ,. f
C.I\ iJ vf1 CI. (Q...t
~.
Computed by t1 Y .s Checked by
; I< IE L IlL V" .A NI ~ L ~ 'rrSl . I"WI c::_
Er..Il:3-lr...IIEE~5 - c;.~NSUL."T"~-"I-r5
2601 NORTH FRONT STREET
HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 1711 0
(717) 232-0593 0 BCJllH392-6532
FAX (717) 232-1799
P OJ r' ('1/11 Lfl j
In (.. ('-Ii n I t1J a.w Vd'~~ VV I) I (rJW i r' i (J rtvL
Of h h U [1 i ! tt 1 L t. 51 n LL tn.;. CJ ~.n c1 LA' j It
wa IU I n 0 f'1 D h (1.1111 LL I oh I ~(ldl Dii d. L..LL 0~'
if l"~-f'''.J
1'; \..,t.~,",I,-.O .
LI' Q r(l 0 l..{ iLl LJ.
" I )
7h.L / /) ~{1 (
VV\ 1"'r11 (I rYu.- 10. ~ e ,
(UJ () lld I 6 r
1Vu.(t}~t.
I
Db ~rvCd fl'){y) trlL S i fe.
(p-t
Job No.. I u o~;.~
Sheet No. _ of_
Drawing No.
Date 8 I & / 0 S
cr to. h vI) or 0 ()
hL /Auntiokd wd-n
[L (Clinhdl event'
.Ai I"< ,<
l' J-
Wi II ~ cW7.t fl'Lf d
na dlSc.hD(~ [)Jill Ju.
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
MUELLER PROPERTY SOUTH
SURFACE LIMESTONE OPERATI"ON
E'ROSION AND S'EDIMENT CONTROL REPORT
PREPARED FOR
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC.
PREPARED BY
SKELLY AND LOY, INC.
ENGINEERS-CONSUL TANTS
o
o
o
U
10
o
\-
SEPTEMBER 2005
o
o
U
D
U
o
U
o
o
o
o
o
o
u
o
o
o
o
o
MUELLER PROPERTY SOUTH
SURFACE LIMESTONE OPERATION
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REPORT
PREPARED FOR
MARTIN MARIETfA MATERIALS, INC.
1980 EAST 116TH STREET, SUITE 200
CARMEL, INDIANA 46032
PREPARED BY
SKELLY AND LOY,INC.
ENGINEERS-CONSULTANTS
2601 NORTH FRONT STREET
HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17110
SEPTEMBER 6, 2005
1605456
0
0
0
0 1.0
2.0
U 3.0
fi 4.0
U 5.0
0 6.0
0
0
0
0
0
U
n
U
0
0
0
0
10
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1
EXISTING VEGETATION AND SITE CONDITIONS. .. . . _. . . . . . . _ . .. . _ _ _. 1
EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONTOURS AND DRAINAGE PATTERNS. . . .. 1
TEMPORARY SEEDING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2
PERMANENT SEEDING . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 3
MUELLER PROPERTY SOUTH SURFACE LIMESTONE OPERATION
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN ........ _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4
6.1 Perimeter Sediment Control Measures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 5
6.2 Permanent Erosion and Sediment Control Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6
6.3 Specific Seeding Information .................................... 6
6.4 Construction Sequence ........................................ 7
- I -
u
o
o
o
o
o
.0
o
o
o
o
[J
o
o
o
o
o
~ 0
I
iO
I
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A - DETAILS
APPENDIX B - SUPPORTING CALCULATIONS
APPENDIX C - MAPS
FIGURE 1 - EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN AFTER STREAM
RELOCATION
FIGURE 2 - EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN BEFORE STREAM
RELOCATION
FIGURE 3- EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL AND PLANTING PLAN -
POST-MINING
- ii -
D
r
U
U
o
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC.
MUELLER PROPERTY SOUTH SURFACE LIMESTONE
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REPORT
1.0
INTRODUCTION
o
u
o
o
u
,-'
u
o
.D
o
o
o
D
.D
o
o
This report addresses erosion and sediment control for Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.'s
(hereinafter referred to as Martin Marietta) proposed Mueller Property South Surface Limestone
Operation. The surface limestone operation will be located on a portion of a 96.921-acre tract
south of 106th Street between Gray Road and Hazel Dell Parkway in the City of Carmel, Hamilton
County, Indiana.
All erosion and sediment control measures and procedures have been designed in
accordance with the erosion and sediment control guidelines contained in the Indiana Handbook
for Erosion Control in Developing Areas (Indiana Handbook). Erosion and sediment control details
are provided in Appendix A. Note that certain standard details were extracted from the
Pennsylvania Erosion and Sediment Pollution Control Manual (Pennsylvania Handbook) when
required details were absent from the Indiana Handbook and when the details contained within
the Pennsylvania Manual were considered to be more appropriate than those in the Indiana
Handbook by the design engineer.
2.0 EXISTING VEGETATION AND SITE CONDITIONS
Mueller Property South currently consists of a former agricultural area and an active sand
and gravel operation ("Mueller Property South Sand and Gravel Operation").
3.0 EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONTOURS AND DRAINAGE PATTERNS
The existing contours, contours during mining, and contours following reclamation for
Mueller Property South are shown on the figures located in Appendix C. The majority of Mueller
Property South drains from north to south and southeast to Blue Woods Creek. A portion of the
southeastern corner of the subject property drains to the northwest, again into Blue Woods Creek.
This creek is also a legal drain that is known as the Moffit and Williamson Drain. Blue Woods
Creek will be the name used throughout this report. Off-site runoff from other properties onto the
- 1 -
o
o
o
o
n
u
subject property will be limited, as surface runoff other than the flow in Blue Woods Creek is
intercepted by existing Martin Marietta mining operations to the south and west of the subject
property, or will be diverted by berms. Runoff from the area east of the subject property drains
to the north or east to the White River.
As part of the Mueller Property South development, Blue Woods Creek will be relocated.
Approvals for the relocation of Blue Woods Creek have been obtained from the Indiana
Department of Environmental Management (IDEM), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps),
and the Indiana Department of Natural Resources (IDNR). The use of appropriate erosion and
sediment controls is a condition of the stream relocation permits and is included in the approved
permit applications. The new Blue Woods Creek channel will be dewatered during construction
and the growing period by pumping water that has collected in the channel into Sediment BaSin
1 or 2 (discussed in Secti(:m 6.1 of this report), and/or pumping to a sediment filter bag.
Calculations and details for the basins and a detail for the sediment filter bag are provided in
Appendices A and B.
Following the relocation of Blue Woods Creek, all runoff flowing to Mueller Property South
from the west and north will be intercepted by the relocated stream and the associated berms
created during construction of the stream and as a result of Mueller Property South Sand and
Gravel Operation. The berms prevent off-site runoff from entering the site. On-site runoff will
continue to drain into the former Blue Woods Creek channel or the sand and gravel excavation
area until the affected area is excavated to a level below the former streambed elevation. A
culvert in the abandoned channel is proposed as part of the stream relocation plan to convey any
remnant flow in the channel through the proposed berm and off-site.
During mining operations, the removal of the overburden and sand and gravel material will
lower the affected area below the elevation of the surrounding ground, which will contain any
potentially sediment-laden runoff within the affected area. Due to geology and the proposed
mining direction from south to north, the affected area of Mueller Property South will drain to the
south to the existing Martin Marietta surface mining operation.
o
o
o
u
.0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
4.0 TEMPORARY SEEDING
The initial seeding application should be the final seeding. The use of the permanent
seeding mixture in place of temporary seeding will eliminate the need to seed twice. Seeding
- 2 -
'-)
u
o
u
o
o
'0
growth will be monitored to assure that a sufficient cover is established and that it is adequately
controlling erosion. If it is not, additional seed will be applied.
However, in the event that temporary seeding becomes desirable due to weather
conditions or other factors, temporary seeding mixtures are provided below. Temporary seeding
will be used to reduce erosion and sedimentation by stabilizing disturbed areas if such areas will
be dormant for a period of 15 days. . Temporary seeding specifications were obtained from the
Indiana Handbook and seed should be applied as fallows.
r
U
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
I SEED SPECIES I RATE/ACRE I PLANTING DEPTH I OPTIMUM DATES I
Wheat or rye 150 Ibs. 1 to 1 }2 in. 9/15 to 10/30
. Spring oats 100 Ibs. 1 in. 3/1 to 4/15
Annual ryegrass 401bs. 1/4 in. 3/1 to 5/1; 8/1 to 9/1
German millet 401bs. 1 to 2 in. 5/1 to 6/1
SudanQrass 351bs. 1 to 2 in. 5/1 to 7/30
Perennial spedes may be used as a temporary cover, especially if the area to be seeded
will remain idle far more than a year. Fertilizer as recommended by a sails analysis will be applied.
In the absence of soil test results, the Indiana Handbook recommends that 12-12-12 fertilizer or
equivalent be applied at a rate of 400 to 600 pounds per acre (Ib/ac.). Mulching with clean grain
straw or hay at rate of 1.5 to 2 tons per acre to protect the seedbed and encourage plant growth
will be applied. Alternate mulching materials may be utilized as specified in the Indiana Handbook.
5.0 PERMANENT SEEDING
o
Permanent seeding will be provided on all disturbed areas, such as berms, that are not
active mining areas. Selected areas that will serve as screening areas, berms, and/or planting
areas are to be seeded with domestic grasses ("No.18 Mix, Wear and Tear") and warm season
(prairie) grass seeding, as indicated an the Erosion and Sedimentation Control and Planting
Plan - Post Mining, located in Appendix C. Seeding mixtures and specifications for those two
s~eding mixes are provided on the plans. All disturbed areas will have a minimum of six inches
of topsoil spread before permanent seeding.
o
o
D
,0
I
- 3 -
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
u
[J
o
o
o
o
o
o
D
o
o
o
All other disturbed areas, including former agrIcultural and sand and gravel areas, areas
that have not yet been mined, and berms will be seeded with a permanent seeding mixture. The
permanent seeding shall be "No.18 Mix, Wear and Tear," as produced by the Indiana Seed Co.
This mixture consists of 25% Omni perennial ryegrass, 20% Penguin perennial ryegrass, 20% SR
4200, and 35% Kentucky bluegrass. This seed shall be applied at a rate of approximately 200
Ib/ac. This mix shall be fertilized with 14-26-10 fertilizer applied at a rate of 220 Ib/ac. Lime shall
be applied prior to seeding if soli test results indicate that the pH of the soli is not suitable for the
success of the seed mix. Mulch of clean grain straw or hay shall be applied at a rate of 1.5 to 2
tons per acre or alternate approved mulching material shall be utilized.
Future seed and fertilizer types and application rates will be as described above, unless
they prove unsuccessful or the Hamilton County Soil and Water Conservation District recommends
an alternative. Lime addition is not anticipated.
6.0 MUELLER PROPERTY SOUTH SURFACE LIMESTONE OPERATION EROSION AND
SEDIM ENT CONTROL PLAN
The proposed Mueller Property South Surface Limestone Operation will be located south
of 106th Street between Gray Road and Hazel Dell Parkway. Limestone extraction will occur on
a portion of a 96.921-acre tract for which special use approval is being sought. Mining activities
will result in the eventual creation of an artificial lake.
A portion of the subject property currently lies within a Special Flood Hazard Area
(floodplain). Blue Woods Creek flows along the southern boundary of the western portion of the
site, then roughly bisects the eastern half of the site. Martin Marietta proposes to relocate this
portion of Blue Woods Creek so that it flows along the western and northern portions of the
subject property. Mining may occur on some portions of the site prior to relocation of the stream,
but mining activities on the entire area for which special use approval is being sought are
dependent on the relocation of the stream.
Erosion and sediment control during the channel construction is provided in the
Construction Plans for Relocation of Blue Woods Creek, Hamilton County, Indiana, prepared by
Weihe Engineers, Inc. ThIS Mueller Property South Surface Limestone Operation Erosion and
Sediment Control Report supercedes the Erosion Control Sequence and Erosion Control
Statement on Sheet 11 of the Blue Woods Creek Relocation Plans. Approvals for the relocation
of Blue Woods Creek have been obtained from the IDEM, the Corps, and the IDNR The use of
- 4 -
D
o
o
u
o
appropriate erosion and sediment controls is a condition of the stream relocation permits and is
included in the approved permit applications.
6.1 Perimeter Sediment Control Measures
\ ]
u
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
u
o
The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan for the Mueller Property South Surface Limestone
Operation is intended to be very similar to that approved for Mueller Property South Sand and
Gravel Operation. Since the activities are occurring on the same parcel and the sand and gravel
deposit overlays the limestone, the sand and gravel must be removed prior to limestone mining
occurring; therefore, the erosion and sediment control measures are applicable to both operations.
Furthermore, the limestone extraction is commencing south of Blue Woods Creek and at the
transition zone between the existing North Indianapolis Operation and Mueller Property South. Any
stormwater runoff and groundwater discharge will drain into the existing limestone operation.
Mining activities on Mueller Property South and the erosion and sediment controls needed
for those activities are dependent on the sequencing of the Blue Woods Creek relocation. The
stream may be relocated prior to mining activities or mining may start before the stream relocation.
Erosion and sediment controls for each of these two scenarios are provided in the following
paragraphs.
If Blue Woods Creek is relocated prior to mining, the stream and the associated berms will
intercept all off-site runoff (see Figure 1) and a pipe culvert with flap gate will be installed in the
former creek channel to allow for drainage of the creek channel in wet conditions prior to any other
earth disturbance activity on the subject property. When earth disturbance starts, the flap gate will
prevent on-site runoff from draining through the culvert into the new channel. Martin Marietta will
strip the overburden from south to north creating a positive slope to south and the on-site runoff
during the stripping will flow south into the old Blue Woods Creek channel and then the existing pit
located at the Martin Marietta North Indianapolis Plant mining operation. Currently, Martin Marietta
is pumping water out of the existing North Indianapolis Plant pit to a retention pond. After mining
starts, on-site runoff will tend to flow into the low mining sumps from the surrounding areas. If at
any time other erosion and sediment control measures such as silt fences become necessary to
prevent sediment from leaving the site, they will be installed.
If Blue Woods Creek is not relocated prior to mining, two sediment basins and interceptor
channels north of the creek (constructed as a result of Mueller Property South Sand and Gravel
Operation) will be built to prevent the sediment laden runoff from flowing into the creek (see
'l
U
D
o
- 5 -
Revised 11/29/05
u
o
u
o
o
o
o
o
[J
D
o
Figure 2). The sediment controls are located outside of the designated floodway boundaries. No
mining activities are expected within the floodway boundaries on either side of the creek before the
relocation of the creek. Martin Marietta also cannot disturb earth beyond the control of the
interceptor channels before some sumps are created. After the low sumps are formed in the
mining area, Martin Marietta can mine across the interceptor channels but away from the floodway
boundaries. This will create a slope to the sumps so that the runoff will not flow toward the creek.
The sediment basins will discharge to the Blue Woods Creek. Prior to this type of discharge, Martin
Marietta would need to obtain an NPDES approval for the site. On the south side of the creek,
Martin Marietta will disturb this area in such a way that all surface and groundwater will be directed
south to the North Indianapolis Operation. Additionally, the floodway buffer areas on either side
of the creek can serve as vegetative filter strips, removing sediment from the water in the
unanticipated event that any runoff flows towards the channel. Sediment Basin 3 on Figure 2 is
being shown as an option if unforeseen erosion control issues dictate the need for its installation.
Detailed design information for the channels and basins is provided in Appendix B.
Seeding is a major erosion control measure during the operation that will be implemented,
regardless of the Blue Woods Creek relocation sequencing. Measures will be taken to control
erosion and off-site drainage while overburden is being stripped and sand and gravel is extracted.
Any disturbed areas that will not be active mining areas will be seeded as soon as work is
completed or final grade is attained. There may be a minor amount of runoff from the lateral
support areas or berm outslopes, but they will normally be vegetated.
11
U
o
o
o
o
o
o
D
6.2 Permanent Erosion and Sediment Control Measures
The permanent erosion and sediment control measures will consist of permanent seeding,
as described in the preceding section of this narrative, and direction of all runoff or encountered
groundwater to the south to the existing Martin Marietta operation.
6.3 Specific Seeding Information
Prior to mining activities, a vegetative cover will be established on dormant cropland. The
vegetative cover will not consist of weeds. All dormant cropland areas and/or former sand and
gravel areas within the limit of extraction and within the setback or buffer that do not have a
- 6 -
Revised 11/29/05
r-)
U
I:
U
U
[J
vegetative cover consisting of vegetation other than weeds will be seeded with the permanent or
the temporary seeding mixture. The decision as to which mixture" to use is described previously.
As mining activities commence, several areas of the site, including the 300-foot buffer and
portion of the berm along 106th Street, are to have trees planted or prairie or domestic grass seed
applied. The areas of seeding are indicated on Figure 3, Erosion and Sedimentation Control and
Planting Plan - Post Mining. Seed will be applied as soon as final grade during mining operations
is attained in these areas. In all other disturbed areas to be vegetated, including berms, permanent
seeding will be applied as soon as final grade during mining operations is attained.
u
[J
o
u
u
u
u
)'
U
o
D
o
o
o
o
\1
U
6.4 Construction Sequence
1.
Prior to earth disturbance activities, appropriate erosion and sedimentation controls will be
in place to prevent sediment from leaving the subject property.
2.
Seed any former cropland areas that do not have a permanent, dense vegetative cover.
3.
If Blue Woods Creek has been relocated, the flap gate will prevent sediment that drains into
the former stream from exiting the site. If Blue Woods Creek has not been relocated, install
channels and sediment basins to capture runoff from .disturbed areas prior to entering Blue
Woods Creek.
4.
Commence overburden and sand and gravel removal (if not already completed) and mining
of limestone rock.
5.
Seed all affected areas to be vegetated that are not active mining areas as soon as final
grade is attained.
6.
Temporary erosion and sediment controls, such as silt fences will remain in place until the
contributing drainage areas are stabilized. These controls may be removed after the
upslope areas are vegetated.
- 7 -
Revised 11/29/05
0'"
:n
l.J
.:0'
'0.'
<,0-
D.
:.0
o
,'0
'.D
o
':0
, ...
D.
o
.0
.:0
'.'1
'0.
.'0.....
.' .
:0-
. #".
"
'I _ ...
"
.,
.~
, )
'.
" .'.
'..
"
...."
,'-- I.
.' .
,"
.... ~'. '
.' '
"
.~ '
,.
, <
"
,'.
,"
""~ .
r .1
AP,PI;N.DIC'ES
~J'~
,
. '.
.'
\.
" '"
:0" ,
0'
0:
U.
,0,
"
.'0
"
"
I
D., "
n
,'W
-
'-0'
0
'd.,
:-0:
0
. '
,'.n
. l..L
'd. ,
i;O
0:
.0'
'0'
"
0 -,
., ,~
..... ."
"
"
"
'"
,....
\",
"
.."'.
.-'....
"i
,~
"
~ :
'AP'PENDIXA -
. no,' . ..,' .
, DIET.AILs
u
o
rl
U
o
o
[J
o
r
u
o
o
o
o
o
D
o
o
o
o
u
Ilz
ROCK FILTERS - Rock flIters may be used to control runoff within constructed channels until the
protective lining is installed. They may also be used below construction work within an eXisting stream
channel while flow is being diverted past the work area. In such cases, the filter should be located
between the work area and the discharge from the bypass system. Rock filters may not be used in lieu
of sediment basins.
Rock filters may be used to control sediment originating within a channel, either during construction of
the channel (before the channel is stabilized) or during a ~emporary disturbance within the channel.
Rock filters may not be used in collector channels in lieu of sediment basins.
Rock filters should not be used in lieu of appropriate channel linings. This practice often results in
overtopping of the channel during storm events, scouring of the channel bottom below the filter, or
erosion of the channel side slopes as sediment deposits build up behind the filter.
Rock filters should not be used in lieu of an adequate protective lining in sediment basin emergency
spillways. This can reduce the effective discharge capacity of the spillway and, in doing so, increase
the possibility of embankment failure.
Rock filters should be constructed according to the specifications shown in Standard Construction
Detail #23.
Rock filters should be constructed with Riprap sized as follows:
For channels with Total Depth> 3 feet, use R-4. ~
For channels with Total Depth between 2 and 3 feet, use R-3.
For channels with Total Depth between 1 and 2 feet, use R-2.
Rock filters should not be used in channels of less than 1 foot total depth.
The filter should be equal in height to % the total depth o'f the channel with a 6" depression in the
center.
A one foot thick layer of AASHTO #57 stone should be placed on the upstream side of the filter.
NOTE: Filter fabric and straw bales should not be used in rock filters!
Rock filters should be inspected weekly and after each runoff event.
Clogged filter stone (AASHTO # 57) should be replaced.
Needed repairs should be initiated immediately after the inspection.
~ 5E:.E: NEkT ?/}G6 r-o~ Rock OC.s/GN/97JO/IJ-S
P4 E~S ?OLLUT/OiV CON/i€Ot::- /?1/9/Vu/lL
363-2134-008 I March 13, 2000 I Page 93
o
u
o
o
o
o
o
o
r-'
U
o
o
u
o
o
o
u
u
o
,
o
2/i
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION DETAIL # 23
Rock Filters
FLOW
R-Z ROCK
AASHTO #57 ROCK
SECTION A-A
TOP OF BANK
-
o
['II
-
'f"'"
Cl
['II
-
-
fD
1'MIN.
SECTION B-B .
FOR 3' ~ 0 USE R-4
FOR 2' ~ 0 < 3' USE R.3
FOR l' ~ 0 < 2' USE R-2
ROCK RIPRAP SIZE I
FILTER NO. LOCATION o (FT.)
/7LL BE/?/J1 /9L 0/1/6 /06 t'A S77C€:.E7 1-.2. 1?-2~ I
~ oR. ;<-3
Sediment must be removed when accumulations reach 11 2 the height of the filters.
Immediately upon stabilization of each channel, remove accumulated sediment, remove Rock Filter,
and stabilize disturbed areas.
;<-z
Rock- dmAx::::3'/
5//
dso -= /.
//1
d/YlIN =
Rock- d/)?/lx -:: 6,1/
d~o -= 3 //
ct/J1P"./ .::: 2 .....1
363-2134-008/ March 13, 2000/ Page 94
R-3
u
u
~
o
u
u
u
u
u
~
u
u
u
u
o
u
o
CI
Ie
'Iz
Purpose
(Exhibit 3. 25-A)
* To reduce erosion in a drainage channel by slowing velocity offlow. (Check dams are commonly
used (a) in channels that arc degrading but where permanent stabilization is impractical due to
their short period of usefulness and (b) in eroding channels where construction delays or weather
conditions prevent timely installation of erosion resistant linings. Do not use check dams in per-
ennial streams.)
Exhibit 3.25-A. A rock check dam with a small sediment trap in a channel.
Requirements
(Exhibits 3. 25-B
and C)
Contributing drainage area: 2 acres maximum.
Dam center: 2 ft. maximwn height but at least 9 in. lower than the outer edges at natural ground
elevation.
Dam side slope: 2:1 or flatter.
Distance between dams: Spaced so the toe of the upstream dam is the same elevation as the top of
the downstream dam.
Overflow areas along channel: Stabilized to resist erosion.
Rock size: INDOT Revetment Riprap.
!
Filter fabric
Filter fabric
\
Exhibit 3.25-8. Forward and cross-section views or a rock check dam.
r
24 in. (max.}
al center
3.25-1
0
0
u
u
U Installation
U
[j
U
0 Maintenance
U
[j
0 Common
concerns
0
U
U
0
U
U
D 3.25-2
zb-
.
ElChibi13.25-C. Space check dams in'the channel 50 the up-stream dam tOI! elevation (A) and down-stream
dam top elevation (B) are the same.
1. Excavate a cutoff trench into the ditch banks, and e>..1end it a minimwn of 18 in. beyond the
abutments.
2. Place the rockin the cutoff trench and channel to the lines and dimensions shown in Exhibit
3.25-B-i.e., center a maximum of2 ft. high yet 9 in. below where the dam abuts the channel
banks. '
3. Extend the rock at least 18 in. beyond the channel banks to keep overflow water from undercut-
ting the dam as it re-enters the channel.
4. Install as many dams as necessary to satisfy the spacing requirement shown in Exhibit 3. 25-C.
5. Stabilize the channel above the uppermost dam.
6. Recognizing that water will flow over and around the lowermost darn, protect the channel doWll-
stream from it with an erosion-resistant lining for a distance of 6 ft. unless the channel is pro-
tected through other means.
'" Inspect check dams and the channel after each storm event, and repair any damage immediately,
'" If significant erosion occurs between darns, install a riprap liner in that portion of the channel
(practice 3.32).
'" Remove sediment accwnulated behind each dam as needed to maintain channel capacity, to allow
drainage through the dam, and to prevenllarge flows from displacing sediment.
* Add rock to the dams as needed to maintain design heightand cross section.
,. When the dams are no longer needed, remove the rock and stabilize channel, using an erosion-re-
sistant lining if'necessary.
Rocks wasbed out-results in channel cutting; repair the washes and replace the rock.
.
Dam too higb-water flow erodes around the rock; to correcl, remove the rock, extend the dam into
the channel bank, then replace the rock.
.
u
u
o
o
o
u
u
u
u
o
u
u
[J
o
o
u
o
u
u
'/3
STORM INLET PROTECTION
Storm sewer Inlets should be protected from sediment pollution wherever the sewer system does not
discharge into a functioning sediment basin. (NOTE: Since detention ponds do not effectively remove
sediment prior to discharging, storm sewers discharging to detention ponds should be protected from
sediment pollution.) Inlet protection may also be desirable in cases where it would be difficult or
expensive to clean accumulated sediment from sewer lines, or where a temporary riser may have to be
removed from a permanent basin prior to completion of all earthmoving. Inlet protection should be
maintained until all earthwork within the tributary drainage area has been completed and stabilized.
Silt fence and straw bale barriers are not intended for use in areas of concentrated flow such as is
common at storm sewer inlets. Typically, the fence or straw bales fail, allowing unfiltered water to enter
the inlet. In those rare instances where the fence or bales do not fail, runoff usually either bypasses the
inlet, causing erosion and/or capacity..prgblems down gradient, or backs up to the point of creating
flooding. This can create traffic hazards.
INLET FILTER BAGS
Filter bags should trap all particles larger than 150 Microns.
Wherever filter bags are used they should be installed according to the manufacturer's specifications.
Typical installation details should be provided on the drawings. NOTE: Filter bags designed to fit over
the inlet grate are not recommended for most storm sewer inlets. Use of such filter bags could result in
a severe reduction of the inlet capacity resulting in flooding or runoff bypassing the inlet Wherever
such bags are used, they should be located at topographic low points and limited to 1 acre maximum
drainage areas. Inlet filter bags are not generally recommended as the primary BMP to remove
sediment from site runoff water.
Inlet filter bags should be inspected on a weekly basis and after each runoff event.
Filter bags should be cleaned and/or replaced when the bag is % full.
Damaged filter bags should be replaced.
Needed repairs should be initiated immediately after the inspection.
CO CRETE BLOCK/GRAVEL INLET PROTECTION
-------
sed, it should be installed according to the
e of inlet protection should not be
Wherever concrete block/grave I
details shown in Standard C etails #29 or
used w ef 0 water would cause a traffic hazard.
P/9 ~QtS POc:.L-UT/O/V CON/::eoL ~AJV~L
363-2134-008 / March 13, 2000 I Page 104
u
D
u
u
o
D
o
o
o
D
o
D
D
D
D
D
o
D
o
I
2/3
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION DETAIL #28
Filter Bag Inlet Protection
Curbed roadway
INSTALLATION DETAIL
2" X 2" X 3/4"
RUBBER BlOCt'i
(TYP)
1/4" NYLON ROPE
EXPANSION RESTRAINT
BAG DEl AIL
INLET
GRATE
.....--- 1.' RE BAR FOR
tL BAG REMOVAL
FROM INLET
Co
l'
CURB
~"1
ELEVATION VIEW
PLAN VIEW
Maximum Drainage Area = % acre.
Inlet protection is not required for inlet tributary to sediment basin or trap. Berms required for all
installations.
Earthen berm shall be maintained until roadway is stoned. Road subbase berm shall be maintained
until roadway is paved.
Six inch minimum height asphalt berm shall be maintained until roadway surface receives final coat.
DO NOT USE ON MAJOR PAVED ROADWAYS WHERE PONDING MAY CAUSE TRAFFIC
HAZARDS
363-2134-008/ March 13, 2000 I Page 105
o
o
u
u
o
u
o
o
o
u
u
o
o
U
D
o
U
o
o
3/3
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION DETAil #28a
Filter Bag Inlet Protection
Channel ,or Roadside Swale
,/'
BAG DETAIL 1" ISOMETRIC VIEW
MIN
2 Mill I_I 2 MIN
1 ~1
'1:-" '""-I
INSTALLATION DEl AIL
2" X 2" X 3!4"
RUBBER BLOCK ~
(TYP)
1/4" NYLON ROPE
EXPANSION RESTRAINT .
1" REBAR FOR
BAG REMOVAl
FROM INLET
."---- BERM
ELEVATION VIEW
Maximum Drainage Area =Y:z acre.
PLAN VIEW
Inlet protection is not required for inlet trihutary to sediment basin or trap. Berms required for all
installations.
Earthen berm in roadway shall be maintained until roadway is stoned. Road subbase berm on roadway
shall be maintained until roadway is paved. Earthen berm in channel shall be maintained until
permanent stabilization IS completed or to remain permanently,
DO NOT USE ON MAJOR PAVED ROADWAYS WHERE PONDING MAY CAUSE TRAFFIC
HAZARDS
363-2134-008/ March 13, 2000/ Page 106
u
u
.
u
o
u
D
o
u
o
fl
~
.0
o
o
u
o
o
u
Ct
o
'/2-
Purpose
(Exhibit 3.52-A)
* To capture sediment at the entrance to a storm drain, allowing full use of the storm drain system
dwing the construction period..
~
,
...~ ;Uio-. ';;'~~::'"~ . ;::'"
Exhibit 3.52-A. A fabric drop inlet protection.
Requirements
(Exhibits 3.52-B)
Contributing drainage area: 1 acre maximwn.
Capacity: Runofffrom a 2-yr. frequency, 24-hr. duration stonn event entering a storm drain with-
out bypass flow.
Fabricmaterial: Geotextile fabric for filtration.
Height of fabric: 1 to 1 Y2 ft., measured from top of inlet.
ApJlI'oach: Pool area flat (less than 1% slope) with sediment storage of 945 CU.ft.lacre disturbed.
Stability: Structure must withstand 1 Yz ft. head of water and sediment without collapsing or under-
cutting.
Support posts: Steel fence posts or 2 x 2-in. or 2 x 4-in. hard wood posts, 3 ft. minimum length, 3
ft. maximwn spacing; top frame support recommended. Cross bracing tops of posts to opposite
comers greatly strengthens support.
2114-in. wood frame
T
1.5 ft. T
(max.)
1
3 ft.
II (max.)
II II
II II 1
II II
II II
v '/
Overflow level set
to prevent by-pass
flow
Exhibit 3.52-8. Supporting frame and installation of the fabric.
3.52-1
0
0 Installation
(Exhibit 3.52-C)
0
0
0
0
0.
U
U
0
0
0
0
Maintenance
0
0
0 Common
concerns
0
0
0 3.52-2
9./z
1. To prevent nmofffrom bypassing the inlet, set the top of the fabric at least 6 in. below the down-
slope ground elevation, OR build a temporary dike (compacted to 6 in. higher than the fabric) on
the low side of the inlet (see Exhibit 3. 52-C).
2. Cut the fabric from a single roll to eliminate joints. (provide at least 2 ft. of overlap if a joint is
needed.)
3. Bury the bottom of the fabric at least 1 ft. deep, backfill, and compact the backfill (see Exhibit
3. 52-B).
4. Space the support'posts evenly against the inlet perimeter a maximum of 3 ft. apart, and drive
them about 1 Y2 ft. into the ground. (Overflow must fall directly into the inlet and not on Wlpro-
tected soil.)
.
Slope I!IT
.
--
~
....-- --~
Runoff overflows
into inlet
~
-
-;;- ~
--- -::::.-- --- ..-
~ ---...
-----
...-- --
~ --::r --<::::::--
-------
Exhibit 3.52-C. Prevent bypass flow with a temporary dike downslope of the inlet.
* Inspect the fabric barrier after stonn events, and make needed repairs immediately.
* Remove sediment from the pool area to provide storage for the next stonn. Avoid damaging or
undercutting the fabric during sediment removal.
'" When the contributing drainage area has been stabilized, remove and properly dispose of all con-
struction material and sediment, grade the area to the elevation of the top of the inlet, then stabil-
ize.
Posts and fabric not supported at tbe top-results in collapse of the structwe.
Fabric Dot properly buried at bottom-results in undercutting.
Top of fabric barrier set too high-results in the flow bypassing the storm inlet or collapsing the
structure.
Temporary dike below drop inlet Dot maintained-results in the flow bypassing the stonn inlet.
Sediment Dot removed from pool-results in inadequate storage volume for the next stonn.
Fence not erectedagaiDst drop inlet-results in erosion and undercutting.
Land slope at storm drain too steep-results in high flow velocity, poor trapping efficiency, and in-
adequate storage volume; excavation of the sediment storage area may be necessary.
.
u
o
~
o
u
o
u
o
o
.~
o
o
u
o
o
o
o
.C'
I r-"\
IU
I
1/2'
Purpose
(Exhibit 3. 54-A)
* To capture sediment at the inlet to a storm drain, allm-ving full use of the drain system during the
construction period.
NOTE: This practice not recommended for paved surfaces due to lack of an anchoring system.
Requirements
Figure 3.54-A. Straw bale drop inlet protection.
Contributing drainage area: 1 acre maximum.
Effective )jfe: Less than 3 months.
Capacity: Runofffrom a 2-yr. frequency, 24-hr. duration storm event entering a storm drain with-
out by-pass flow.
Approach: Pool area flat (less than 1% slope), with sediment storage of 945 cu.ft.lacre disturbed.
Bale dimensions: Approximately 14 in. x 18 in. x 36 in.
Height of bales above inlet: 14 in. (i.e., 18-in. high bales entrenched 4 in.).
Anchoring: Two 36-in. long (minimum) steel rcbars or 2 x 2-in. hardwood stakes driven through
each bale.
Installation
(Exhibits 3.54-B
and C)
I. To reduce bycpass flow, ensure that the top of the bales will be at least 6 in. below ground eleva-
tion on the downslope side of the inlet. This may require constructing below the inlet a tempo-
rary dike (compacted to 6 in. higher than the top of the bales) OR using the straw bale drop inlet
protection in conjunction with an excavated drop inlet protection (practice 3.51).
2. Excavate a trench at least 4 in. deep and a bale's width around the inlet.
3. Place the bales lengthwise in the trench so the bindings are oriented around the sides, rather than
top and bottom, to minimize deterioration of the bindings.
4. Allow thc bales to overlap at the corners, and abut them tightly against each other.
S. Anchor the bales by driving two 36-in. long steel rebars or 2x2-in. hardwood stakes through each
bale Wltil nearly flush with the top. Drive the first stake at an angle towards the previously laid
bale to force the bales together.
6. Chink (i.e., tightly wedge) straw into any gaps between bales to prevent sediment-laden water
from flowing directly into the inlet.
7. Backfill and compact the excavated soil 4 in. high against the outside of the bales.
3.54-1
0
0
0
u
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Maintenance
0
0
0 Common
concerns
U
U
0 3.54~2
2/2
Drop inlet with grate
Slaked
slraw bale
Compacted soil
to prevent piping
.
Staked straw bales
(two stakes per bale)
Exhibit 3.54-8. Oblique view of a properly installed straw bale drop inlet protection.
.
Exhibit 3.54-C. Here's an almost totally ineffective straw bale drop inlet protection-bales oriented wrong (t.e.,
bindings exposed to the ground), and not overlapped, abutted, staked, or chinked.
* Inspect the drop inlet protection after each storm event, and make needed repairs immediately.
* Remove sediment from the pool area to ensure adequate runoff storage for the next rain, taking
care to not damage or undercut the bales.
* When the contributing drainage area has been stabilized, remove all bales, construction material,
and sediment and dispose ofpropcrly, grade the disturbed area to the elevation oCthe top of the
inlet and stabilize.
Flow undercutting tbe bales-because the bales were not entrenched and backfilled.
Bales dislodged-because the bales were not securely anchored.
Flow by-passing the inlet-because the dike was not maintained or was too low.
Sediment not removed from pool-results in inadequate storage volume for the next storm event.
Land slope at inlet too steep-results in high flow velocity, poor trapping efficiency, inadequate
storage volume; to correct, excavate the sediment storage area.
Bales falling apart-because they were laid with bindings running top and bottom rather than
around sides or were utilized beyond their 3-mo. effective life.
.
[J
o
.
u
o
o
'0
.D
l(
u
[J
.~
o
o
u
o
o
o
o
~
.u
u
t/'f.
Purpose
(Exhibit 3. 74-A)
* To retain sediment from small, sloping disturbed areas by reducing the velocity of sheet flow.
(NOTE: Silt fence captures sediment by pan ding water to allow deposition, not by filtration. Al-
though the practice usually works best in conjunction with temporary basins, traps, or diversions,
it can be sufficiently effective to be used alone. A silt fence is not recommended for use as a di-
version; nor is it to be used across a stream, channel, or anywhere that concentrated flow is antici-
pated.)
Exhibit 3.74-A. This silt fence protects the street from sediment. The last section of fence is angled toward
the vacant lot to prevent runoff from bypassing the fence.
Requirements
(Exhibits 3. 74-B
and C)
Drainage area: Limited to ]/4 acre per 100 ft. offence; further restricted by slope steepness (see
Exhibit 3. 74-B).
Location: Fence nearly level, approximately following the land contour, and at least 10 ft. from toe
of slope to provide a broad, shallow sediment pool.
TreDcb: 8 in. minimum depth, flat-bottom or V-shaped, filled with compacted soil or gravel to
bury lower portion of support wire and/or fence fabric.
Support posts: 2 x 2-in. hardwood posts (if used) or steel fence posts set at least 1 ft. deep. * (Steel
posts should have projections for fastening fabric.)
Spacing of posts: 8 ft. maximum iffence supported by wire,
6 ft. for extra-strength fabric without wire backing.
Fence beigbt: High enough so depth of impounded water
does not exceed 11,12 ft. at any point along fence line.
Support wire (optioDal): 14 gauge, 6-in. mesh wire fence
(needed ifusing standard-strength fabric).
Fence fabnc:Woven or non-woven geotextile fabric with
specified filtering efficiency and tensile strength (see Ex-
hibit 3. 74-C) and containing IN inhibitors and stabilizers
to ensure 6-mo. minimum life at temperatwes OO-120oF.
Exhibit 3.74-8. Maximum Land
Slope and Distance for Which a
Silt Fence Is Applicable.
Land slope
Max. distance
above fence
Less than 2%
2 to 5%
5 to 10%
10 to 20%
More than 20%
100 ft.
75 ft.
50 ft.
25 ft.
15 ft.
* Some commercial silt fences come ready to install, with support posts at.
tached and requiring no wire support.
3.74-1
0
u
0
0
0
0
0 Installation
(Exhibits 3. 74-D,
0 E, and F)
0
U
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U 3.74-2
.2/4
Physical property
Woven fabric
Exhibit 3.74-C. Specifications Minimums for Silt Fence Fabric.
Non-woven fabric
Filtering efficiency
Tensile strength at
20% elongation:
Standard~rength
Extra strength
Slurry flow rate
Water flow rate
UV resistance
85%
85%
30 Ibs.llinear in.
50 Ibs.llinear in.
0.3 gal./minjsq.ft.
15 gal./rnin.lsq.ft.
70%
50 lbs./linear in.
70 Ibs.llinear in.
4.5 gal.lmin./sq.ft.
220 gal.lmin.lsq.ft.
85%
.
Outlet (optional): To allow for safe storm flow bypass with-out overtopping fence (see Exhibit
3.74-D). Placed along fence line to limit water depth to 1112 ft. maximum; crest-l ft. high maxi-
mum; weir width--4 ft. maximum; splash pad-5 ft. wide, 5 ft. long, 1 ft thick minimum.
SITE PREPARATION:
1. Plan for the fence to be at least 10ft. from the toe of the slope to provide a sediment storage area.
2. Provide access to the area if sediment c1eanout will be needed.
OUTLET CONSTRUCTION (OPTIONAL) (see Exhibit 3. 74-D):
1. Detennine the appropriate location for a reinforced, stabilized bypass flow outlet (unless the
fence is designed to retain all runofffrorn a 2-yr. frequency, 24-hr. duration storrnevent).
2. Set the outlet elevation so that water depth cannot exceed 1 Y2 ft. at the lowest point along the
fence line.
3. Locate the outlet weir support posts no more than 4 ft. apart, and.install a horizontal brace be-
tween them. (Weir height should be no more than than 1 ft. and water depth no more than 1 I,4 ft.
anywhere else along the fence.)
4. Excavate the foundation for the outlet splash pad to minimums of 1 ft. deep, 5 ft. wide, and 5 ft.
long on level grade.
5. Fill the excavated foundation with INDOT CA No.1 stone, being careful that the finished sur-
face blends with the surrounding area, allowing no overfall.
6. Stabilize the area around the pad.
.
EJlhibit 3.74-0. Overflow weir for a silt fence outlet.
.
c
u
G'
o
o
o
o
o
[J
~
[J
o
o
o
o
o
o
..
u.
r
U
3/4
FENCE CONSTRUCTION (see Exhibit 3. 74-E):
L Along the entire intended fence line, dig an 8-in. deep flat-bottomed or V-shaped trench.
2. On the downslope side of the trench, drive the wood or steel support posts at least 1 ft. into the
ground (the deeper the better!), spacing them no more than 8 ft apart if the fence is supported by
wire or 6 ft. if extra-strength fabric is used without support wire. Adjust spacing, if necessary, to
ensure that posts are set at the low points along the fence line. (NOTE: If the fence has pre-at-
tachedposts or stakes, drive them deep enough so the fabric is satisfactorily in the trench as de-
scribed in Step 6.)
3. Fasten support wire fence (if the manufacturer reconunends its use) to the upslope side of the
posts, extending it 8 in. into the trench.
4. Run a continuous length of geotextile fabric in front (upslope) of the support wire and posts,
avoiding joints, particularly at low points in the fence line.
S. If a joint is necessary, nail the overlap to the nearest post with lath (see Exhibit 3. 74-F).
6. Place the bottom 1 ft. offabric in the 8-in. deep trench, extending the remaining 4 in. toward the
upslope side.
7. Backfill the trench with compacted earth or graveL
NOTE: If using a pre-packed commercial silt fence rather than constructing one, follow manu-
facturer's installation instructions.
I Support wire
Filter fabric -....
.... Slope Compacted
~- soil,
~~~ A \;::::( .
tll~Illi1=U!!1-=. :.::;-....,::;
'f1-=:lffi=lll! 8 ~n. :'.:::'.:',;
. -\...-;";\1':",:" (mln.)...- '.
-::~TIi\ ~:.::.;:.:;
-:. ,';..: .... '.:
\"4' ~
m.
-<I- Post 1 Bin.
deep (min.)
ITII 1ll1==-1I -
8in.=III~illJ=~ II~ ~
{mln.)\!!1 IllS. J!J=-_ '1~11I IH\=:
gl ml 11113111 ,::=TIrg =1/1
-L lrI2HII_\lll~~ .:\\I~1I1 1I11~
~J1111~11/81\P-"/1l1 11l\~ 1111
V-trench with gravel
Exhibit 3.74-E. Detailed example of silt fence installation (showing flat-botlom and V-shaped trenches).
Maintenance
Exhibit 3.74~. Detail of a silt fence joint.
* Inspect the silt fence periodically and after each storm event.
* If fence fabric tears, starts to decompose, or in any way becomes ineffective, replace the affected
portion immediately.
3.74-3
u
0
U
Common
0 concerns
(Exhibit 3. 74-G)
0
0
0
0
0
U
0
U
U
0
U
0
U
0
0 3.74-4
Jij'f
* Remove deposited sediment when it reaches half the height of the fence at its lowest point or is
causing the fabric to bulge.
* Take care to avoid undermining the fence during clean out.
* After the contributing drainage area has been stabilized, remove the fence and sediment deposits,
bring the disturbed area to grade, and stabilize.
.
Fence sags or collapses-because drainage area was too large, too much sediment accumulated be-
fore cleanout, approach slope was too steep, or the fence was not adequately supported.
Fence undercut or blown out at tbe bottom by excessive mnoff---because the fence bottom was not
properly buried .at all points, the trench was not backfilled with compacted earth or gravel, the
fence was installed on excessive slope, or the fence was located across a drainageway.
Fence overtopped-because the sediment storage area was inadequate, no provision was made for
safe bypass of storm flow, or the fence was located across a drainageway.
Erosion occurs around end offeoce-because the fence terminated at an elevation below the top of
the sediment storage pool, the fence terminated in an un stabilized area, or the fence was in-
stalled on excessive slope.
Dense soil layers exposed by excavation or caused by equipment compaction--<::ause difficulty in
driving wooden posts to sufficient depth; solve by using steel posts.
.
.
Ellhibit 3.74-G. Concentrated flow and eJlcessive drainage area caused these silt fences to fail.
u
[J
o
o
o
o
o
D
o
U
U
o
o
o
o
PLACE BAG ON
AGGREGA TE OR
STRAW
HIGH STRENGTH
DOUBLE STITCHED
"J" TYPE SEAMS
SEWN IN SPOUT
r
:r:
I-
o
3:
HIGH STRENGTH
STRAPPING TO
HOLD HOSE IN
PLACE
L
I
PUMP DISCHARGE
HOSE
LENGTH
TOP VI EW
OPENING TO
ACCOMODATE UP
TO 4" DISCHARGE
HOSE
AGGREGATE OR STRAW
UNOERLAYMENT
SIDE VIEW
SEDIMENT FILTER BAG
N.T.S.
o
NOTES:
FILTER BAGS SHALL BE MADE FROM NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE MATERIAL SEWN
WITH HIGH STRENGTH. DOUBLE STITCHED "J" TYPE SEAMS. THEY SHALL BE
CAPABLE OF TRAPPING PARTICLES LARGER THAN 150 MICRONS.
A SUITABLE MEANS OF ACCESSING THE BAG WITH MACHINERY REQUIRED FOR
DISPOSAL PURPOSES MUST BE PROVIDED. FILTER BAGS SHALL BE REPACED
WHEN THEY BECOME 1/2 FULL. SPARE BAGS SHALL BE KEPT AVAILABLE FOR
REPLACEMENT OF THOSE THA T HAVE FAILED OR ARE FILLED.
BAGS SHALL BE LOCATED IN WELL-VEGETATED (GRASSY) AREA, AND DISCHARGE
ONTO STABLE. EROSION RESISTANT AREAS. WHERE THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE, A
GEDTEXTILE FLOW PATH SHALL BE PROVIDED. BAGS SHALL NOT BE PLACED ON
SLOPES GREATER THAN 5%.
THE PUMP DISCHARGE HOSE SHALL BE INSERTED INTO THE BAGS IN THE MANNER
SPECIFIED BY THE MANUFACTURER AND SECURELY CLAMPED
THE PUMPING RATE SHALL BE NO GREATER THAN 750 GPM OR 1/2 THE MAXIMUM
SPECIFIED BY THE MANUFACTURER, WHICHEVER IS LESS. PUMP INTAKES
SHOULD BE FLOATiNG AND SCREENED.
FIL 1ER BAGS SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY. IF ANY PROBLEM is DETECTED,
PUMPING SHALL CEASE IMMEDIATELY AND NOT RESUME UNTIL THE PROBLEM IS
CORRECTED.
o
o
o
0:
:0
."
.0
Q':.
'0:
n.,.
U....
'0:.'
,:0.
0'
:'0'
'0
Q.
,D.,
'> ,";. r
.0'
,'0:.
:0
:,.0
o
0..'
;.,,"
"
" ,
..; .
':t
-.-'
,
.\. ,.
.1
i""~
J
~~ J,
.'
. '.
"
'r
"
. ;,..
. .
".
I",
v. ~
~ ~-. \
.'
~
"
'_",1
"
.'
,
,
'.
..-\ .
"
"
"
,
"
,-
"
"I',
. - 'APPENDI)( B -
.SU,P'P.ORTI'N(l ::CA'LCl.fLATION:S'
. ~ .' . ',' ~ . . .
,l
-( "
"
... ..;:
Us I< ~!:-"'-=-:!~C>~~~~L~~ U.....C.
o
o
o
o
D
o
o
o
o
2601 NORTH FRONT STREET
HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 1711 0
(717) 232.()593 e 800-892-6532
FAX (717) 232-1799
Subject Hvl-e.lkcr Prope-f~ SOi15th
>w! ri rYl-e1A.+ ba <;,,", ,I "'If 2
~ Bt11iPvLAI. bet .:)n 3
Computed by
Checked by
Job No. 160 d2 ;;;}
,
Sheet No. ----L... of ---3-
Drawing No.
Date
Tt1cU.. drcul~ e O(,r€Cc norrfh of +~ ;lvrt.e1cqmr chAr'iter'} =.:. && Ct(
j.1se Mo ~"l~".,ylevvr bCi.5"l'I0 /ft.) r.e,tttA1 ~tfhneV'.::f- frt'wl <A-r"pr>>~?Ute{ In 11~1t~VV tJr.rtJtrtld-rl S
ecuA- bith,\'1 lz:, t=e-5f&M,'ble fr 13 t.it.L ~tr(}'x:),rI.A1-eIfj-
rer/r.e~! '"Sf'cl"'Wl-eAT S'.fVrotj€ = /&00 frY lU- Y 13 .= d,~q 00 ~
mirl 11,;1[41 btUl/J ~fz/r~e rer'~d =: cR.x c/,t)..t9tJ ~ 4680C f'4- ~
(
:De ~'~r1ed
B~5 ,'1'\ p, \.."ey..f;\lb n
80 ff&m: I ffO )( 65
11<~d rbol
o
,.
os'
"
~""erj€M.3 SI'>Jlt~ ~r;e~>
\
\
\
D
o
o
o
o
D
o
U
:i.S
7H k;.,,'2:
7:'" I 5 I
73~ Ba~,''''"2.
7 30 go-'l.~' l
///~/--/~III
r,;:J? 0 :;}p
732 C ru';'\1 '2. )
730 (r.S491'YI j)
8.uill\ ""3.ti1N(je :::: i (65 X /80 -+ 71-t 194-) X 3.5" == 47 d '16 r-n /> *68fOo f13.
T mr e-tt\(/~{o-:::'
Nt{
71 '=:'~.5::j ?;2:..1
o
5 K. ELL -V A.......ICJ L c::I Y'" ...... ~_
,,' e"'GII'.IEERS. CQI'..ISLJL"T.A"'TS
D
U
o
o
o
o
u
u
o
o
r--'
U
D
u
o
o
o
[~
U
C'
U
Subject
Job No.
Sheet No. ~ of ~
Drawing No.
Date
2601 NORTH FRONT STREET
HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 1711 0
(717) 232-0593 · 800-892-6532
FAX (717) 232-1799
Computed by
Checked by
prrVLe"\foL -SP,' If WCLj
!o~'ttxr &-tf hr r-o(,tl~iA_
p =- Lt. 2-- I'll
/
13Q{ :: e6bo76 r
te.swl:+-..s --rOW\ 'TQ-55 a.r€ '}?,(Jf- Y.(y(~tvlC!bte fer "fht's oleS'j.t1, l-1$Q. e~nh1te 4: r-e1.ere1lt-€
-frOM P4 5i5 HCtA'IMP-e +0 <;,'"2t the p(,lt'lcCpaJ s-rN1Wq:j
OcVe(tlse (1-u'\o.ft = _8t.b07bx 4.;;;'
;) if 'X 3600 x 1rJ.
J,:3 tt5
desJrI rt~n~* &T --<;f,'IIIJJOj cafCl.c 11~ = 0l,3 ')(3 :::: 6.9' cjs
II I '..t I'
&tS,.e al+ conV\o~t;t<ec f11e-t"alrpe 4' I g CMp bafrE I
{J r iirl (.42 flOcLA)
o.~ c.5
tl =- t-A (~\.}) := o.bA (?J ~j)
A::: 1,iCfft<-
H- =- ~,5 f-t
m as
eX ==- 0.6 x3./tf(64U.fJxo,s) = 10,] ct~
[,1.)(2 11r fl6-vJ
Q ==- CL./-d-'S :::: 5./ LrJ'-5
L -:::6.28 t+
H ~. 0.$ fr
15
Q ~ 1. / X 6.e;.gx 0,5 =
6.0 M~
I J
1
7' pe fI {YI.J
2Ji M cs
C)-aT ~\L l
- L H Ii"".... /Lp L J
a~f.77
{.~ 734. ') - (7-30.5 -f- ())5) :;: -3,J~ /
r-1
US I< =!7-",-=-:!'s~~~~s~5~",~ ......c.
Subject
Computed by
Checked by
Job No.
Sheet No.3-of l
Drawing No.
Date
o
u
o
U
D
[J
o
[J
[J
o
o
o
o
o
o
u
o
u
2601 NORTH FRONT STREET
HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 1711 0
(717) 232-0593 D 800-892-6532
FAX (717) 232-1799
(im ~ ;.0
/Lp -=- {J,D,/" 77
L :::. 50 I
[ Ol.x 3~-~ }! ;,;)5 J ~,5
Q -:::- r 77 IT /,0 -+ O,C'p 77 '/so ::: II, I cp
brYIe~Olts- 5 r Uw~
J5 -1+:41 d-cr - h () Vcr r~J vtill p =c lj, 8 J I y1
alJe.r~c n</it9Jf ::: ~6076 X Lt. g ::: 3,.b & '5
c).q-x36cox/OJ. . 1
d.v;1~tl e.'r>>e(jCttCo- <;rltW-Cj co...ra{ l\ier Q cc:. J.1; .cf.s
ex ~ CL--H1.5 ~ d, 't L HIS
IT::: O,5ft
7-8 = 8.g '- Xf).SIS ~ L::=: 7.Q ft
k?t L=-JO'
Q ,s
(AVO) 'GtbtL CLtfOc(').+(t == d, 8)( ;)0 y' 05 = I Cf. 8 ~
~ :p,'sd\O-~
In-p:e.rc.ef1&rv WVc~lg ure oIet;\~\\eeJ based Or! ;;'5 ~to,'!" .e~-r. Q::. ),8 Cis
.Pr(N\II\.~ a.r.eCi, for O'('HIcY-~ se{JiIYr~:AJt.r btl..6,IV\ 3 == JO ttL
(lv$e ~ -sa...Me oOIY'<t-I''L.sle-t.\ oW.;,IV'f'\ fer [)~e.\!1') -3 ~ ik e)e vl/..~'1!C~'1,'tS foy rsr.<A;.IF;~ '3 6'<~r?? -S-iVt1e P!:,
J-kt-~e. e+ !3CV.JfI fJ.
u
D
D
Channel 1
Worksheet for Trapezoidal Channel
Project Description
Project File
Worksheet
Flow Element
Method
Solve For
u
o
o
o
untitled.fm2
Channel 1
Trapezoidal Channel
Manning's Formula
Discharge
Input Data
Mannings Coefficient
Channel Slope
Depth
Left Side Slope
Right Side Slope
Bottom Width
0030
0.005000 Nft
1.00 ft
3.000000 H : V
3.000000 H : V
3.00 ft
\
\<
o
3'
IJ
1
Results
Discharge
Flow Area
Wetted Perimeter
Top Width
Critical Depth
Critical Slope
Velocity
Velocity Head
Specific Energy
Froude Number
Flow is subcritical.
o
u
u
LJ
15.66 cfs
6.00 ft2
9.32 ft
9.00 ft
0.74 ft
0.017042 Nft
2.61 ftls
0.11 ft
1.11 ft
0.56
CIl'"a...~.~
o
o
o
o
o
[J
r '
U
06124104
07:08:42 PM
J~, I ~
L-! ;,", , t"LU
Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666
FlowMaster v515
Page 1 of 1
D
[J
o
Channel 2
Worksheet for Trapezoidal Channel
Project Description
Project File
Worksheet
Flow Element
Method
Solve For
D
o
o
untitled.fm2
Channel 2
Trapezoidal Channel
Manning's Formula
Discharge
Input Data
Mannings Coefficient
Channel Slope
Depth
Left Side Slope
Right Side Slope
Bottom Width
u
u
o
u
0.030
0.001500 fUft
1.00 ft
3.000000 H : V
3.000000 H : V
3.00 ft
f
3'
Results
Discharge
Flow Area
Wetted Perimeter
Top Width
Critical Depth
Critical Slope
Velocity
Velocity Head
Specific Energy
Froude Number
Flow is subcritical.
U
D
8.58 cfs
6.00 ft2
9.32 ft
9.00 ft
0.53 ft
0.018588 ftlft
1.43 ftls
0.03 ft
1.03 ft
0.31
G rO~S s
1..)'1" ntl
(j
D
U
o
o
u
u
o
06/24/04
07:07:19 PM
Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755~1666
FlowMaster v5.15
Page 1 of 1
, '
o
:0
o
D.
0
0
:0
0'
,.0 . . ,.
:
:0:.:
_D~:
U'
.'
';Q'
,:0
0,'
""
:U
,.0
r
0
"0,:'
: ,,' I
, .-
~.' .
. ~
,,,.
I'"
'( "..
,',
.'
'. .
,j'
.....-
"
-;"\.
,,'
,. ..l
t'
, ,,'
'.'
^ /.
"
. <
'A'P:PE:NDIX.'C
I\(IA,PS
'.
.T '.'
. .
"
~
."""
,
!!
..
l
....
",1;\
. (;
l
, '!.
.~
. (
,~
, jt
.t
c
r-
u
w
327 lAC 15~5~ .5 (a)(7)
STORM WATER POLLUTION
PREVENTION PLAN
u
(7) A storm water pollution prevention plan associated with construction activities. The plan must
be designed to, at least, meet the requirements of sections 7 and 7.5 of this rule and must include
the following:
A storm water pollution prevention plan is not applicable to this application since all
proposed activities will be conducted underground and no surface facilities or land
disturbances whatsoever are being proposed for the surface. A storm water pollution
prevention plan was created forthe surface limestone operation which is located beginning
on Page 7 -2 ofthis notebook. Note that this storm water pollution prevention plan has been
modified to reflect a change in the plant manager.
LJ
(A) Location, dimensions, detailed specifications, and construction details of all temporary
and permanent storm water quality measures.
See Mueller Property South Surface Limestone Operation Erosion and
Sediment Control Report contained on Page 6-5 of this Construction Plan as well as
the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan beginning on Page 7 -2.
(B) Temporary stabilization plans and sequence of implementation.
See Mueller Property South Surface Limestone Operation Erosion and
Sediment Control Report contained on Page 6-5 of this Construction Plan.
(C) Permanent stabilization plans and sequence of implementation.
See Mueller Property South Surface Limestone Operation Erosion and
Sediment Control Report contained on Page 6-5 of this Construction Plan.
(0) Temporary and permanent stabilization plans shall include the following:
(i) Specifications and application rates for soil amendments and seed mixtures.
(ii) The type and application rate for anchored mulch.
See Mueller Property South Surface Limestone Operation Erosion and
Sediment Control Report contained on Page 6-5 of this Construction Plan.
(E) Construction sequence describing the relationship between implementation of storm
water quality measures and stages of construction activities.
See Mueller Property South Surface Limestone Operation Erosion and
Sediment Control Report contained on Page 6-5 of this Construction Plan.
(F) Self~monitoring program including plan and procedures.
See Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan beginning on Page 7-2.
(G) A description of potential pollutant sources associated with the construction activities,
that may reasonably be expected to add a significant amount of pollutants to storm water
discharges.
See Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan beginning on Page 7-2.
(H) Material handling and storage associated with construction activity shall meet the spill
prevention and spill response requirements in 327 lAC 2-6.1.
See Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan on Page 7-9.
u
7-1
o
MUELLER PROPERTY SOUTH
SURFACE LIMESTONE OPERATION
STORM WATER POLLUTION
PREVENTION PLAN
PREPARED FOR
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC.
u
PREPARED BY
SKELLY AND LOY, INC.
ENGINEERS-CONSULTANTS
MARCH 2008
u
7-2
u
u
u
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
EMERGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION. . . . . _ _ . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . - 7-4
DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL POLLUTANT SOURCES ... - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-5
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CONTROLS. . .. .. _ .. . . . . . - . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . 7-6
FACILITY INSPECTION CHECKLIST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-8
7-3
u
u
u
STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC.
MUELLER PROPERTY SOUTH SURFACE LIMESTONE OPERATION
Emergency Contact Barry Benson
Title: North Indianapolis Plant Manaqer
Work Phone: 317-846-5942
Emergency Phone: 317-319-2942 (mobile)
NPDES Permit Number:
INR102163
7-4
u
STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
This storm water pollution prevention plan was developed in accordance with the
requirements of sections 7 and 7.5 of Rule 5. Proposed activities for the project site include
conducting a surface limestone operation on the Mueller Property South utilizing typical mining
equipment. Approval to conducta surface sand and gravel operation on Mueller Property South
has already been approved by the City of Carmel-Clay Township Board of Zoning Appeals.
Benches will be created and fragmented limestone rock will be transported to adjacent plant sites
for processing. As part of the Mueller Property South development, Blue Woods Creek, which
currently traverses across the southern/southeastern portion of the property, will be relocated.
Approvals for the relocation of Blue Woods Creek have been obtained from the Indiana
Department of Environmental Management (IDEM), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps),
and the Indiana Department of Natural Resources (IDNR).
A separate document entitled, "Mueller Property South Surface Limestone Operation
Erosion and Sediment Control Report," provided on Page 6-5 of this Construction Plan, presents
information relevant to erosion and sediment control measures appropriate to minimize
sedimentation. Within the referenced report, the locations, dimensions, detailed specifications, and
U construction details for all controls are provided. Temporary and permanent stabilization plans, and
sequence of implementation and construction are also provided in said report. All erosion and
sediment control measures will be installed under the guidance of a trained individual.
u
DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL POLLUTANT SOURCES
The minerals to be extracted from the proposed operation include soils, sand and gravel,
and limestone rock. The products are used by consumers for various construction activities.
Material extracted from the site will be processed and stored off-site at existing Martin Marietta
processing facilities adjacent to Mueller Property South. Overburden will be removed using
earthmoving equipment such as pans, front-end loaders, etc. Martin Marietta will use typical mining
equipment such as loaders, backhoes, and trucks to remove the sand and gravel. The limestone
will be extracted by creating benches and transporting fragmented rock to adjacent Martin Marietta
processing facilities at the North Indianapolis Plant. A phased approach to mining and concurrent
reclamation plan will be employed to the extent possible in order to minimize the disturbance of
large areas.
7-5
There will be no fuel or other chemical storage within the proposed Mueller South Surface
U Limestone Operation. All fueling will take place off-site at existing operations. Appropriate
measures will be implemented to eliminate wastes (garbage, debris, etc.) from being carried from
the project site. Discretely placed dumpsters will be used as receptors if necessary for
municipal-type trash produced at the site.
A stable construction site access will be provided at all points of construction traffic ingress
and egress to the project site. No impervious surfaces are proposed for the site. There are no
potential pollutant sources associated with the construction activities that may reasonably be
expected to add a significant amount of pollutants to storm water discharges.
A notice will be posted near the main entrance to the project site containing a copy of the
completed Notice of Intent (NOI) letter, NPDES permit number, name, company name, telephone
number, and address of a contact person, and the location of the Construction Plan. Any
contractors who enter the site will be informed of the conditions of Rule 5 and the conditions and
standards of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan.
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT CONTROLS
U Nonstructural pollution prevention practices and self-monitoring (inspection, good
housekeeping, preventive maintenance, and employee training) will be practiced at all times. The
self-monitoring program to be implemented will include the following. A trained individual will
perform a written evaluation of the project site by the end of the next business day following each
measurable storm event and, at a minimum, one time per week. The evaluation will address the
maintenance of the storm water quality measures (i.e., basins, channels, berms, etc.) to ensure
that they are functioning properly. Any additional measures necessary to remain in compliance
with all applicable statutes and rules will be identified. Written evaluation reports will include
fA) name of the individual performing the evaluation,
e date of the evaluation,
iSl problems identified at the project site, and
@ details of corrective actions recommended and completed.
These reports will be made available to the inspecting authority (Hamilton County Soil and Water
Conservation District) within 48 hours of a request. See sample inspection form on Page 7-8.
u
7-6
Martin Marietta intends to fuel and service al] equipment off-site. Equipment will be
U inspected daily to ensure that there are no hydraulic fluid, oil, antifreeze, or fuel leaks. In the event
that a piece of equipment would break down on-site, with no ability to relocate off-site for servicing,
proper spill prevention and control practices will be implemented. The excavation contractor, and
any other contractors on-site, will adhere to the Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure
Plan. Solvents and other chemical reagents will be handled and disposed of by an approved dealer
in accordance with all local, state, and federal regulations. The Spill Prevention, Control, and
Countermeasure Plan, covering the proposed operation and Martin Marietta's adjacent North
Indianapolis Plant is also included on Page 7-9 of the Construction Plan.
u
u
7-7
-~-----
c'
c
c)
STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
FACILITY INSPECTION CHECKLIST
Name:
Date of Inspection:
-....j
I
co
CONTROL STRUCTURE PROBLEMS CORRECTIVE ACTIONS CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
IDENTIFIED RECOMMENDED COMPLETED
Basins
- Check storage capacity
- Remove trash and debris
- Check for erosion from earthen embankment
- Ensure proper drainage
Berms
- Check for good vegetation
- Check for openings or erosion
Channels
- Check for proper drainage
- Check for accumulation of sediment in flow
area
- Check outlets for bank stability
- Check grass-lining
Additional Comments
o
u
u
o
o
o
D
o
o
o
o
o
D
o
D
o
D
o
o
Martin Marietta Aggregates
:
~. -.
SPILL PREVENTION, CONTROL, AND
COUNTERMEASURES PLAN
North Indianapolis
4700 East 96th Street
Indianapolis, Indiana 416240
_F~~;.G.JJi{r.rJ::JttQ~~Iort,='4if'QFR-ji~~~r~L _ .._____ - - . .---~--~-:--~
I hereby certity that I or my designated agent has visited and examined the facility; and being
familiar with the provisions of 40 CFR Part 112, attest that this SPCC has been glrepared in
accordance witb good engineering practices, including consideration of applicable industry
standards and tbe requirements of 40 CFR 112, that procedures for required inspections and
testing have been established, and tbat the Plan is adequate for the facility.
~,.\I""G"',q
#,'f'o. \ MAX l.l~4'o,~
A~\.\;.......""'.'7~. ~.
19:-.....,;:,..~6\S T~rri:....(/ ~
:: '!;fl '0 No O....~ ~
'l31"'L. .~.,.
i~" ,D ~~'ifJ'~
:: .f 1 fi:.'l. J115 .;' ~
~ -0 i 1Ql~~ : Cc ~~
\~\ '-'TATE Of /1:/ i
~ :;;('~" /10. ".... o:?" .:::
~ <;..(i....."DIA\\Irj.,...'.. ..~'
~"I.tJ.rlo.;;flT..~~~~~~~...~
~""J;.. U'ii i'\ .- . :\,\'1}
~q:t~'I}.J~~,.ijll~\ ~
Darrell Max Williams '
f?;;;:::i7;r:;'ZfIL
Signature of Registered Froftssional Engineer
(Seal)
Registration No.:
16245 State: Indiana
Date: March 19. 2008
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
Indiana District Office
11405 North Pennsylvania Street, Suite 250
Carmel, Indiana 46032
317-573-4460
o
D
o
U
U
o
[J
u
o
o
u
lVlartin Marietta Materials, Inc.
Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures Plan
North Indianapolis
Table of Contents
Plan Certification - 40 CFR 112.3(d)....... .... ............................. .... ......... ......
General Information................................ . . . .. . .. . . . . .. . . .. .. . . .. .. .. . . .. .. . . .. . .. . . . . ..
Spill Experience - 40 CFR 112.7(a) ..... ... ...... ... ...... .................. .,.. .... ...... .....
Applicability.- 40 CFR 112.1...................... ...... ............................. ., .........
Record of Amendments & Plan Review- 40 CFR 112.5(a)(b) & (c)........................
Plan Conformance - 40 CFR 112.7(a)(1)& (2) ..................... ..........................
Management Approval- 40 CFR 112.7.... .... ........ ....... .............. ............... .....
Facility Layout- 40 CFR 112.7 (a)(3)........................................... ......... ......
Discharge Reporting Procedures - 40 CFR 112.7 (a)(4) ....................................
Discharge Countermeasure Procedures - 40 CFR 112.7 (a)( 5). . . . .. .. . .. .. .. . .. . . .. . .. .. .. .
Potential Equipment Failures -40 CFR 112.7(b) ..............................................
Containment and Diversionary Structures - 40 CPR 112.7(c)(1)...........................
Demonstration oflmpracticability ~ 40 CFR 112. 7( d) ...................................... ..
Inspections, Tests and Records - 40 CFR 112.7(e) ..."..... ....... .......".................
Personnel, Training and Discharge Prevention Procedures - 40 CPR 112.7(f)............
Security - 40 CFR 112.7(g) ......................................................................
Tank Tmck Unloading - 40 CFR lI2.7(h)..... ..........................."...... ..............
Field Constructed Containers - 40 CFR I 12.7(i).............................................
Conformance with State Program - 40 CFR 112.7(j)...................................... .
Facility Drainage - 40 CFR lI2.8(b).............................................................
Bulk Storage Tanks - 40 CPR lI28(c).................... ........... ..................... ......
Transfer Operations, Pumping, and In-Plant Processes - 40 CFR 112.8(d).. .............
Oil-Water Separators - 40 CFR l12.8(d) .......................................................
Certification of the App. of the Substantial Harm Criteria (40 CFR 112 App. C)..... ....
Plan Understanding and Acknowledgement.................... .................................
[J
o
o
D
Appendices
Page No.
Cover
3
4
6
7
8
11
12
13
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
22
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Tank Inspection Checklist.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A
Secondary Containment Drainage Log. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. B
Detailed Discharge Report Form................................................................ C
DIscharge Prevention Briefings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... D
AST InspectiorvT esting Schedules. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. E
Containment V o1ume Calculations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F
u
Figures
o
o
o
USGS Quad Sheet.... .................... ..... ........ ................... ... ...... ........ ....
Site Map -40 CFR 112.7(a)(3)........ ................. .... ...... ... ... ........... .........
2
spec Plan - Nort~ Indianapolis - Updated 03108
Figure No.
1
2
Revision 3: 10/2007
[j
u
[J
o
o
o
[J
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
D
o
o
u
o
1.
NAME OF FACILITY:
2.
TYPE OF FACILITY:
3.
LOCATION OF FACILITY:
(See Figure 1)
4.
OWNER Al\"D/OR OPERA TOR:
5.
Ol'ERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE:
6. COMPANY CONTACTS:
Ed Gehr, Vice President/General Manager
Telephone: (317) 573-4460 (Office)
(317) 844-2514 (Home)
(317) 213-6231 (Mobile)
Brett Wissel, Assistant Plant Manager
Telephone: (317) 846-5942 (Office)
(317) 569~ 73 88 (Home)
(317) 503-2479 (Mobile)
7.
LOCATION OF spec PLAN:
North Indianapolis
Open pit and underground limestone mme
SIC: 1422 NAlCS: 212312
4700 East 96th Street
Indianapolis, Indiana 46240
Lat: N 390 56' 00" Long: W 860 05' 00"
Martin MaIietta Materials, Inc.
11405 North Pennsylvania Street, Suite 250
Carmel, Indiana 46032
317 -573-4460
Barry Benson, Plant Manager
Telephone: (317) 846-5942 (Office)
(317) 913~1628 (Home)
(317) 319-2942 (Mobile)
Ken Parsons, District Production Manager
Telephone: (317) 573-4460 or 846-5942 (Office)
(765) 349-9805 (Home)
(317) 418-2502 (Mobile)
Max Williams, Senior Environmental Engineer
Telephone: (317) 573-4460 (Office)
(317) 576-9421 (Home)
(317) 573-5975 (Fax)
(317) 418-2508 (Mobile)
In Plant Manager's and Senior Environmental
Engineer's offices.
8. DATE FACILITY BEGAN OPERATIONS: This operation was acquired when Martin Marietta
Materials, Inc. (Martin Marietta) purchased American Aggregates Corporation in May 1997.
9. DATE OF INITIAL spec PLAN: There was a spec Plan for this facility at the time it was
purchased. Updated plans have existed since that bme.
spec Plan - North Indianapolis - Updaled 03/0&
3
RevisioOl 3: 10/2007
u
u
u
u
u
u
o
o
o
D
u
u
o
D
[J
u
[J
o
u
A spill occurred on December 2, 1998. The hose to the 1,000 gaJ10n diesel fuel tank (Tank #22) located in the
mme was run over by a track dozer, cutting the hose and causmg fuel to siphon out. ApproXImately 200 to 300
gallons of fuel was estimated to have been spilled and Incident No. 9812009 was assigned to this occurrence. A
report was submitted to Robert Truelove of IDEM on February 26, 1999.
A spiJ1 occurred on November 12,2001. The 10,000-gallon diesel fuel tank (Tank #13) was overfilled and fuel ran
into Lower Sump No 1. Some sheen was initially seen in the Upper Sump, however, the spill did not leave the
site. Spill response was performed by Spi)] Recovery of Indiana. Incident No. 200111094 was assigned to this
occurrence and a report was sent to Brian Smith of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management on
December 11, 200 L
A spill occurred on July 7, 2005. The 10,000-gallon diesel fuel tank (Tank #13) was overfi]]ed and an estimated
five to ten gallons of diesel fuel foamed out of the vent. Some fuel ran into the lower mine then to the Lower
Sump No. 1. Absorbent materials, including a peat moss product, were used to recover the spin. Spill response
was performed by Duke's Earth Services, Inc. IDEM was notified and Incident No. 2005-07-032 was assigned.
The IDEM contact was David Cage.
A spill occurred on December 3, 2005. The hose ruillling from the lubricant tank to the 7-foot cone crusher (Tank
#11) broke betvveen 8:00 AM and 8:30 AM. Approximately 100 gallons ofCitgo EP Compound 150 oil ran into
Lower Sump No.1. Some oil was found in the Upper Diversion Ditch. Pumps were shut off. A peat moss
product was applIed by plant personnel. Spill response was performed by Duke's Earth Services, Inc. IDEM was
notified and Incident No. 2005-12-019 was assigned. The IDEM contact was Bill Myers.
A spill occurred on January 13,2006. The luhIicant line for a crusher at screening plant (trom Tank #3) broke and
lost approximately 10 gallons of oil. Some sheen was seen in Upper Diversion Ditch but nothing was found going
off site. IDEM was notified and Incident No. 2006-01-100 was assigned.
A spin occurred on February 15, 2006. Approximately 50 gallons of crusher oil was spilled from Tank #3 at
screenmg plant. Much of spi]) was trapped on platform. A peat moss product and some soil were used to capture
spill. An estimate of no more than five gallons reached nearby sump. Spill response was perfomled by Duke's
Earth SefVIces, Inc. IDEM was notified but no incident number was assigned. The IDEM contact was David
Cage.
A spill occurred on August 18, 2006 at approximately 10: 15 PM. Approximately 165 gallons of crusher oil was
spilled due to a rupture in the line that runs from the oil tank to the crusher. The spill impacted approximately 0.1
acre of pit floor and water adjacent to Lower Sump No.1. Plant personnel used absorbent materials, including
pads, booms and a peat moss absorbent, to contain the spIll. Duke's Earth Service was contacted to assist with
recovery of the spill. The used a vacuum truck and additional absorbent materials to accomplish the recovery.
Additional booms were placed around the pumps in the Upper Sump, where the lakes west of Gray Road overflow
into Blue Woods Creek and in the creek where River Road crosses it. There was no evidence of the spill having
reached these three areas, however. Duke's Earth Service recovered four drums of fines, booms and pads,
andl,658 gallons of fluids that contained two percent oil. Brian Smith assigned Incident No. 2006-08-176 to this
spill. A report was submitted to him on September 14, 2006. As a preventative measure, this hose was scheduled
for replacement each May, September and December.
A spill occurred on March 30, 2007 at approximately 6:00 PM. The lubncation line for a crusher at the wash plant
broke at about 5 :45 PM. The air filter on the breather carne loose and fell on the line. This caused a cut that was
small enough such that the pressure drop was not enough to cause shutoff, therefore, oil squirted out slowly. The
estimated loss was 50 to 100 gallons of 1 SO-weight 011. The spill reached the Upper Diversion Ditch and the
Upper Sump, but it stayed stagnant around the pumps in the west end of the Upper Sump. Additional booms were
placed in the sump at the wash plant, around the pumps in the west end of the Upper Sump, just west of the pump
4
spec Plan- Nmth Indianapolis - Updated 03108
Revision 3: 10/2007
o
u
u
u
o
o
o
o
o
D
U
[J
[J
r-'I
U
u
u
D
D
u
in the east end of the Upper Sump, in Blue Woods Creek on the east side of the Cannel Concrete crossing and
where the lakes west of Gray Road overflow into Blue Woods Creek. An absorbent material purchased from
Chern Search was also used. Brian Smith was the IDEM contact. Incident No. 2007-03-266 was assigned to this
spill. Duke's Earth Service was hired to clean up the spill. They skimmed 475 gallons of oil and water from the
Upper Sump. Also contacted were Jerry Liston of the Hamilton County Surveyor's Office (Blue Woods Creek is a
legal drain under their jurisdiction) and the City of Carmel Water Utility.
A. spill of approximately 45 gallons of crusher oil was spilled at the wash plant on September 18, 2007 at
approximately 9:30 PM. A rupture in a oil line caused the spill. Booms were placed in the sump adjacent to the
wash plant and around the pumps in the west end ofthe Upper Sump. All pumps in the Upper Sump were shut off
after the spill occurred. Brian Smith was the IDEM contact. Incident No. 2007-09-119 was assigned. Martin
Marietta personnel perfonned the recovery of the spill.
5
spec Plan - Nortll Jndianapolis - Updated 03/08
Revision 3: 10/2007
o
o
LJ
[J
o
[j
u
u
o
o
u
D
o
o
o
o
o
o
u
Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plans for facilIties are prepared and implemented as
required by United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEP A) regulations contained in Title 40, Code of
Federal Regulations, Part 112 (40 CFR 112). The purpose of an spec Plan is to form a comparable
Federal/State spill prevention program that minimizes the potential for discharges. A non-transportation related
facility is subject to the SPCC regulations if: the aboveground storage capacity of the facility exceeds 1,320
gallons; or the underground storage capacity exceeds 42,000 gallons; and if, due to its location, the facility could
reasonably be expected to discharge oil into or upon the navIgable waters of the United States. Only containers
with a storage capacity of 55 gallons or greater are included in the calculation of aboveground storage capacity.
The spec plan is not required to be filed with USEP A, but a copy must be available for on-site review by the
Regional Administrator during normal working hours. The spec plan must be submitted to the USEP A
Regional Administrator and the applicable state agency, alung with other information specified in ~1l2.4
if either of the following occurs:
1. The facility has discharged more than 1,000 US gallons of oil in a single discharge into or upon
the navigable waters of the United States or adjoining shorelines in a single event;
2. The facility had discharged more than 42 US gallons of oil in each of two (2) discharges within
any twelve (12) month period.
The below listed information must be submitted to the USEPA Regional Administrator within sixty (60) days if
either of the above tlu-esholds are reached. The report is to contain the following infom1ation:
1. Name of the facility;
2. Name( s) of the owner and/or operator of the facility;
3. Location of the facility;
4. Maximum storage or handling capacity of the facility and normal daily throughput;
5. Corrective action and countermeasures taken, including description of equipment repairs and/or
replacements;
6. A description of the facility, including site and topographic maps, flow diagrams;
7. The cause(s) of such discharge(s), including a failure analysis of system or subsystem in which
failure occurred;
8. Additional preventive measures taken or contemplated to minimize the possibility of
recurrence;
9. Such other infoffi1ation as the Regional Administrator may reasonably require pertinent to the
Plan or discharge.
The SPCC Plan shall be amended within six (6) months where there is a change in facility deSIgn, construction,
operation, or maintenance that materially affects its potential for a discharge. The plan must be reviewed at least
once every five (5) years and amended to include more effective prevention and control tec1mology, if such
technology has been field-proven at the time of the review and will significantly reduce the likelihood of a
discharge. A registered professional engineer must certify all technical changes.
Owners and operators failing or refnsing to comply with the spee regulations shall be subject to a Class
I civil penalty in an amount up to $25,000 for a violation or a Class II civil penalty in an amount up to
$125,000 for a violation. This language tracks the language in Section 311(b)(6)(B) of the Clean Water
Act, 33 U. S. C. ~1321(b)(6)(B).
If the owner and/or operator of a facility is required to prepare an spec plan but is not required to submit a
Facility Response Plan, the spec plan should include a signed certification form, Certification of the
Applicability of the Substantial Harm Criteria, as contained in Appendix C to Part 112.
6
SPCC Plan - Nortll Indiampolis - Updated 03/08
ReviSion 3; J 0/2007
u
u
o
u
u
u
u
o
o
o
D
u
o
o
o
u
D
[J
[j
40 CFR II2.5(a), (b) and (c) requires the spec Plan to be amended whenever there is a change in facility
design, construction, operation, or maintenance, which materially affects its potential to discharge to navigable
waters of the United States or adjoining shorelines. In addition, the owner or operator must complete a review
and evaluation of the SPCC plant at least once every five (5) years. Amendments to the Plan shall be made
within six (6) months of the change or review, WIth teclmical amendments certified by a Professional Engineer
(PE). Administrative updates such as name or phone number changes do not require PE certification.
2
3
3/11104
3/22/05
Plan update in accordance with
ro osed lllle chan es.
Administrative and map revisions
Contact Names Update, Drum
#26 addition
Plan update for management and
tank changes.
Plan update in accordance with
12/06 mle changes.
D. Max Williams
Indiana
Indiana
16245
890260
D. Max Williams
James R. Luckie",icz
4
3120/07
D. Max Williams
Indiana
16245
7J . f/;!. I11diana
:P:7l1~ . ~
16245
5
3/19/08
Note:
The owner or operator must complete a review and evaluation of the spec plant at least once every five (5)
years. The Plan must be amended within six (6) months of the review to include more effective control and
prevention teclmology, if such technology has been field-proven at the time of the review and will significantly
reduce the likelihood of a discharge.
7
spec PI.n - North lndianapolis - Updated 03!O~
ReV1S;OIl 3: 10,/2007
u
o
u
n
U
u
o
o
o
o
o
u
u
o
u
o
u
o
lJ
[J
This Plan was prepared in general conformance with the minimum standards under 40 CFR 112. Where there is
deviation from any applicable part of this regulation, with the exception of the secondary containment
requirements under 40 CFR 112.7 (c) and (h)(l), equivalent environmental protection by other means of
prevention, contTol or countem1easure is provided.
The SPCC regulation at 40 CFR Part 112 is more stringent than requirements from the State of Indiana for this
type of facility. This SPCC Plan was written to conform with 40 CFR Part 112 requirements. The facility
thereby conforms with general requirements for the State of Indiana. All discharge notifications will be made
in compliance with local, state, and federal requirements.
Below is a Summary of the Deviations found in this plan:
POTENTIAL EQillPMENT FAILURES - 40 CFR 112.7(b)
Releases occurring outside secondary containment (e.g. from overfilling vehicles, hose ruptures, etc.) will be
contained on-site using absorbentJadsorbent materials (pads, booms, drip pans, dirt, sand, etc.) and readily
available mobile equipment. The topography is generally flat around the tanks, but several are located near
sumps that collect water. These sumps either overflow into ditches or have pumps in them.
The Wash Plant Sump, located immediately north of the wash plant, overflows into the Upper Diversion Ditch
that runs along the west side of the quarry. That ditch flows into the Upper Sump, a ditch that runs along the
north side of the quarry. Pumps are located in the west and east ends of the Upper Sump, The pumps in the
west end, which are at the northwest comer of the quarry, pump water into the former sand and gravel pits west
of Gray Road. These pits overflow into Blue Woods Creek. The overflow is NPDES Pem1it No. lNG4900l2
Discharge Point 003. The pump in the east end of the sump pumps directly into Blue Woods Creek and is
Di scharge Point 004.
Absorbent booms and pads will be placed in the Wash Plant Sump if spillage enters it. Water entering it, due to
operation of the wash plant, will be stopped. The downstream pumps in the Upper Sump will be shut off to
prevent the spill from reaching the ponds west of Gray Road. Absorbent booms and pads will be utilized in the
Upper Diversion Ditch and the Upper Sump ifthey can be effective in these locations.
Two sumps are located on the quarry floor. Lower Sump No.1 is near the cone crusher. Lower Sump No.2 is
east of the ramp that accesses quarry floor. Water from these two sumps is pumped to the Upper DIversion
Ditch. Spills in the quarry that reach either of these nearby sumps will be controlled by shutting off the pumps.
The pumps in the Upper Sump will be shut off if there is a possibility that a spill will reach it. Absorbent booms
and pads will be utilized as described above.
Spills in the underground mine have the possibility of reaching Lower Sump No.1. If this happens, spill control
will be as described above. Mining occurs only in the upper level of the underground mine. Drainage from this
level is routed to the lower level via drill holes. Hole plugs are available to stop spills in the upper level from
reaching the lower level.
The terrain around the aboveground shop is flat, so spills outside containments are not likely to travel far. Those
that reach the drainage southeast of the shop WIll flow towards the Upper Diversion Ditch and be controlled as
described above.
The Milestone Sump coli ects drainage from mostly along the east side of the quarry. Water that collects in it is
pumped directly to White River as Discharge Point 001. The possibility of spills reaching that sump is very
minimal. Regardless, the pump wiII be shut off should any spill reach that collection basin.
8
spec PlaTl- North Indianapolis - Updated 03/08
Revision 3. 10(2007
o
[J
u
o
u
o
o
o
o
u
o
u
D
u
u
o
o
u
u
Spill kits and/or sorbent materials are located near the wash plant, adjacent to Tanks No. I and No.2, in the
aboveground shop and in the underground mine shop.
A contractor will be utilized for spills beyond the control of Martin Marietta personnel. Spills that get into
sumps will likely fall into this category.
CONT AINMENT Al\T{} DIVERSIONARY STRUCTURES - 40 CFR 112.7(c)(1)
As a deviation from rule requirements, secondary contamment is not provided for fuel delivery vehicles. Other
measures, generally having tanks located on flat topography, are used instead to contain any discharge until its
cleanup, Spills outside secondary containments caused by delivery activities will be controlled the same as
spills due to equipment failures described previously. Delivery companies will be responsible for spills they
cause.
As a deviation from rule requirements, secondary containment is not provided for mobile operating or
processing equipment, as it is not practical given the relatively small quantities of fuels and oils stored on such
equipment. Further, mobile equipment is parked in areas such that discharges can be readily contained due to
the topography, Equipment used aboveground is parked adjacent to the aboveground shop where the
topography is generally flat. Equipment in the underground mine is parked near the underground shop where
the mine floor is generally flat.
SE,CUIUTY - 40 CFR 112.7(g)
1.
Fencing, or other alternative means of access restriction is provided, where appropriate, to deter
unauthorized entry. The site is not entirely fenced due to its large area, however, the site is
inspected on a daily basis by an off-duty member of the Carmel Pohce Department.
2.
Master flow and drain valves are to be locked in the closed position except during authorized
containment drainage.
3,
Electrical starter controls for the oil pumps are to be locked in the "off' position and are to be
located in an area accessible only to authorized personnel when the pumps are in a non-
operating status.
4.
The loading and unloading connections of oil piping are capped when not in service or when in
standby service for an extended period oftime,
5.
Lighting near the tanks is adequate for operating needs and to discourage vandalism. It is
sufficient to identify and allow recovery of spills in those areas. At other areas additional
lighting will likely be necessary. If a contractor is involved with the cleanup, they will have
supplemental lighting.
TANK TRUCK UNLOADING - 40 CFR 112.7(h)
1. Secondary containment is not directly provided for tank loading/unloading areas. Tank
loading/unloading activities shall be monitored by Martin Marietta personnel to reduce spill
potential. The facility has other prevention systems in place. In general, the facility topography
is flat such that a spill would likely remain localized near the source. In addition, facility
drainage is such that runoff is directed either into the Lower Sump No. 1 or Lower Sump NO.2
in the quarry, or the Upper Diversion Ditch and the Upper Sump area from the plant site. These
areas are visually inspected on a daily basis and the sump pumps can be shut off so that a spill
9
spec Plan - Nonh Indianapolis - Updated 03108
Revision 3: 10.'2007
D
u
to these areas can be cleaned up prior to discharge. Spill kit supplies including sorbent
materials are readily available for containment and cleanup. Within the underground mine, drill
hole plugs will be used to plug dramage holes from the upper to the lower mine levels, if
required. The facility may also consider providing secondary contamment structures for these
areas as necessary.
u
2.
A physical barrier, warning sign, or wheel chocks, may be provided in loading/unloading areas
to deter vehicles from departing before complete disconnection of oil transfer lines. It is the
vendor's responslbility, however, to ensure that transfer lines are properly connected before and
properly disconnected after filling storage tanks.
o
D
3.
In instances where fueling/lubricating of company equipment can only occur outside of
secondary containment, a spill containment kit shall be available. This kit shall be kept on the
vehicle providing the fuel/oil.
u
4.
The fueled/lubricated vehicle's lowem10st drain plug, along with any other leak outlet, shall be
examined after fillmg and before leaving the service area.
Un
.
[J
5.
Dehvery tankers should be inspected before and after unloading to verify the quantity recelVed.
Drivers are to remain with their tankers during the entire unloading period. PetToleum product
vendors shall provide some means to clean up any incidental spillage.
u
Specific sized secondary containment for mobile refuelers at this facility (i.e., vendor tank tmck offloading) is
not required by the December 2006 revision to the SPCC rules.
u
[J
o
o
o
u
o
D
D
[J
10
spec Plan -North Indianapolis - Updated 03108
Revision 3 1012007
u
o
u
o
u
u
o
u
o
u
o
D
o
o
o
o
o
u
o
This Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasures (SPCC) Plan is fully supported by the management of Martin
Marietta Materials, Inc. cfbis Plan will be amended in the event of a change in facility design, construction,
operation, or maintenance that could affect its potential to discharge oil into the waters of the United States.
~! lit-
Edwin P. Gehr, Vice President/General Manager
$.-/i - 2-80 B
Date
11
SPCC Plan - Nonh Indianapolis - Updated 03108
Revision 3; 1012007
[J
u
o
o
D
o
u
o
u
[J
D
[J
o
o
[J
[J
o
o
o
A Site Map is provided as Figure 2 indicating the location and surface flow runoff direction of each of the
fuel/oil storage containers regulated by this rule.
1 Above 10,000 Diesel Steel Concrete
2 Above 1,000 Gasoline Steel Double-walled
3 Above )50 Crusher Oil Steel Steel w/mof
4 (Tank was
removed)
5 Above 550 Used Oil Steel Steel w/mof
6 Above 250 Antifreeze Steel None, inside shop
7 Above 550 Lube Oil Steel Steel
8 Above 550 Lube Oil Steel Steel
9 Above 550 Lube Oil Steel Steel
10 Above 550 Lube Oil Steel Steel
11 Above 360 Lube Oil Steel None, inside building
12 Above 628 Antifreeze Steel None, inside building
13 Above, in mine 10,000 Diesel Steel Steel, with rain shields
14 Above, in mine 250 Lube Oil Steel Steel
15 Above, in mine 250 Lube Oil Steel Steel
16 Above, in mine 250 Gear Oil Steel Steel
17 Above, in mine 250 Antifreeze Steel Steel
18 Above, in mine 250 Hydraulic Steel Steel
19 Above, in mine 250 Hydraulic Steel Steel
20 Above, in mine 275 Used Oil Steel Stc;el
21 Above, in mine 275 Used Oil Steel Steel
22 Above, in mine 1,000 (Empty) Steel Steel
23 Above 5,800 (est.) Transformers Steel None, not ra ctieal
24 Above (40 drums, 2,100 Lube Oil or Steel None, flat topography
est. ) Grease
25 Mobile equipment 3,400 (est. Lube Oil Steel None, not ractical
26 Above, in mine 550 Lube Oil Steel Steel
27 Above 180 Crusher Oil Steel None, on platfoilll
28 Above 180 Crusher Oil Steel None, on latform
Total: 40,898
******************************
DESCRIPTION OF STORED PRODUCTS:
o Petroleum products are used to service mobile and plant equipment. The types of petroleum products typically
used are diesel fuel, gasoline, engine oil, and lubricating oils.
o Typical products used at the shop include, but are not limited to parts washer fluid, antifreeze, brake fluid,
transmission fluid, and hydraulic fluid.
. Various types of electrical equipment located on the property that may contain dielectric fluid include
transformers, capacitors, starters and magnets.
12
spec Plan - Nonh Indianapolis - Updated 03/08
Revision 3: lU/2007
[J
o
u
[j
u
u
u
[J
[J
o
u
u
u
[J
o
u
u
o
u
The following reporting procedures should be immediately implemented after an oil/fuel discharge (of any size)
has occurred.
1. Immediately contact the Plant Manager to report the discharge:
Plant Manager:
Office Phone Number:
Fax Number:
Home Phone Number:
Barry Benson
317-846-5942
317-846-6146
317-913-1628
lfthe Plant Manager:is not available, contact the Martin Marietta Materials, mc. Environmental
Contact:
MMM Environmental Contact:
Office Phone Number:
Fax Number:
Home Phone Number:
Mobile:
Max 'Villiams, Senior Environmental Engineer
317-573-4460
317-573-5975
317-576-9421
317-418-2508
2. Based on the size, nature and circumstances of the discharge, the Plant Manager shall contact the
Environmental Contact who will notify the appropriate regulatory authorities. In addition, federal
SPCC regulations require that any discharge with the potential of reaching a navigable waterway in
harmful quantities, as defined in 40 CFR 110.3, be immediately reported to the National Response
Center (NRC). Any discharge greater than 42 US gallons in volume must be immediately reported to
the NRC.
State of Indiana Regulations require that a reportable spill be reported to the Indiana Department of
Environmental Management, Office of Ernergency Response within two hours after the detection of the
spill or discharge. Following are phone numbers for agencies that may need to be contacted and a
recommended spill contractor:
Indiana Departmcnt of Environmental Management
Office of Emergency Response
317-233-7745 or 1-888-233-7745
City of Carmel Fire Department
911 or 317':571-2580
City of Carmel Water Department
Aftcr normal business hours
During normal business hours
911 or 317-571-2580
317-571-2443
Hamilton County Emergency Management Agency
911 or 317-770-3381
Haniilton County Surveyor's Office (24-hour number)
(for spills that threaten Blue Woods Creek, a legal drain)
317-465-4830
Duke's Earth Service
317'-831-1971 or 1-888-322-3374
National Response Center:
(800) 424-8802
13
spec Plan - North lndianapolis - Updated 03/0S
Revision 3: 10/2007
~
u
o
o
u
o
u
o
U
D
U
U
o
U
o
U
U
D
[J
When contacting the above agencies, have the following information should be readily available:
. Time, location, and source of discharge:
o Type and quantity of material discharged:
. Cause and Circumstances of discharge:
. Hazards associated with the discharge:
.. Personal injuries, if any:
. Corrective action taken or planned to be taken:
CD Name and number of individual repOliing discharge:
o Any additional pertinentinfoffi1ation:
**REMEMBER TO COMPLETE DETAILED DISCHARGE REPORT IN APPENDIX C, OR AN
EQUIVALENT REPORTH
14
spec Pl.n - North Indianapolis - Updated 03/08
Revision 3: 10/2007
, '
u
. 'I
U
u
1. In the event of a discharge, appropriate actions shall be taken to contain the discharge using all available
means including absorbent/adsorbent materials and readily available mobile equipment. As mentioned
previously, spill kits and/or absorbent materials are located near Tanks No. 1 and No.2, in the
aboveground shop and in the underground shop.
o
J
2. In the event of an uncontained discharge, the discharge may be controlled by utilizing available facihty
equipment to construct a containment berm down gradient from the discharge and absorb/adsorb the
discharged material with sand, screenings, agricultural hme, or whatever fines that are on hand at the
plant. This material shall be properly disposed in accordance with applicable local, state and federal
environmental regulations.
J
3. After containing the discharge, all media (soil, water, etc.) that came into contact with oil must be
collected and stored in such a way as not to continue to affect additional media. Examples of proper
materials to use for cleanup include adsorbents/absorbents such as aggregates fines, dirt, absorbent pads,
booms, socks, etc. Proper cleanup will be deemed complete when all the objectives of the local, state
and/or federal cleanup levels are met. Martin Marietta Environmental personnel will determine proper
cleanup levels.
J
u
r~
U
4. Materials that have come into contact with the discharged fluids shall be placed in a temporary staging
area until proper methods of disposal can be determined. Sampling of impacted media may be required
prior to determining a proper method of disposal. Detemlining a proper method of disposal will take
into consideration all local, state and federal environmental regulatory requirements. Maliin Marietta
Environmental personnel will handle that portion ofthe cleanup process.
J
o
5. In the event of a leak from the tank or piping, as much of the discharge as possible shall be collected
manually and stored in an appropriate container until proper disposal or reuse. Immediate action shall
be taken to stop or minimize the leak rate. The remaining product in the containment area shall be
cleaned up and properly disposed.
o
6. In the event of a tank, hose or piping failure; arrangements shall be made to empty the tank to a safe
level by immediately filling all mobile equipment on the job. The products remaining m the
containment shall be handled as described in Item 4.
o
7. In the event of a fire, the local fire authority shall be contacted immedlately.
u
8. All liquids used in the shop shall be properly stored and handled. All product containers shall be sealed
when not in use with any damaged containers returned to the appropriate vendor.
u
o
o
u
u
15
spec Plan - North [ndJanapolis - Updated 03/0&
Revision 3: 1012007
u
r ,
u
D
D
D
o
u
D
u
u
[J
u
o
o
D
u
u
[J
D
Potential Event
Complete failure of full tank
Partial failure of full tank
Tank overfill
Pipe failure
Leaking pipe or valve failure
Tank truck leak or failure
Hose leak/rupture while fueling
Pump rupture or failure
I-lose leak on mobile equipment
Vandalism
Dischar~e Direction
Containment
Containment
Containment
Containment
Containment
See Site Map
See Site Map
See Site Map
Varies
See Site Map
Volume Released
Up to 10,000 gals.
1 to 10,000 gals.
1 to many gals.
1 to many gals.
1 to many gals.
1 to many gals.
1 to several gals.
1 to several gals.
1 to 50 gals.
1 to 56,000 gals.
Dischar2:e Rate
Instantaneous
Gradual to Instantaneous
Varies
Varies
Varies
Up to 200 gal/min
Up to 40 gal/mm
Up to 40 gal/min
Gradual to Instantaneous
Gradual to Instantaneous
A release due to a failure of an above ground storage tank (AST) will be detected by visual inspection. Most
leaks, ruptures, or discharges will be contained within the containment structure(s). Releases occurring outside
secondary containment (e.g. from overfilling vehicles, hose ruptures, etc.) will be contained on-site using
absorbent/adsorbent materials (pads, booms, drip pans, dirt, sand, etc.) and readily available mobile equipment.
As mentioned previously, spills reaching the sumps will be control1ed by shutting off pumps, utilizing absorbent
materials and, if necessary, a contractor.
spec Plan - North Indianapolis - Updated 03108
16
Revision 3: 1012007
u
[J
u
rl
U
u
u
o
u
u
u
u
o
o
o
[J
I'
U
o
[J
o
1.
The type of secondary containment structures for each tank is listed on Page 12 of this plan.
Calculations to detennine containment capacity and freeboard are provided in Appendix F. Tanks No.
11, which contains lubricant oil, and No. 12, which contains antifreeze, are not located in containment
structures, however. They are located in a building constructed several years ago, and it would be
difficult to install containment The building floor will provide some protection to contam spills. Also,
procedures regarding shutting off pumps in the adjacent Lower Sump No. 1 and the Upper Sump, and
the utilization of absorbent matenals and a contractor, will be implemented as necessary should spills
occur. Tanks No. 27 and No. 28, which contain crusher oil, are located on a platform adjacent to the
wash plant but are not in secondary containment It would be difficult to provide secondary
containment for these tanks as they are located without extensive redesign. Similar procedures
described for Tanks No. 11 and No 12 apply, including shutting off pumps in the Upper Sump.
2.
As a deviation from rule requirements, secondary containment is not provided for fuel delivery vehicles.
Other measures (flat topography, diversionary benns, catch basins, natural depressions, sand and gravel
pits, etc.) are used instead to contain any discharge until itsc1eanup. Procedures for spills that reach any
of the previously mentioned sumps will be implemented as necessary for spills that reach or. threaten to
reach these sumps. Specific procedures for shutting off pumps, and utilizing absorbent materials and a
contractor, were described previously.
3.
Surface drainage due to relatively flat topography and porous ground surfaces is such that any oil
discharged outside the containment areas should be retained on-site. Special emphaSIS will be made to
prevent spills from reaching Blue Woods Creek.
4.
Any pumps outside the containment structure and/or piping leading into or out of the containment
structure shall be adequately protected from unauthonzed use or from vandalism and should be fitted
with quick shutoff valves.
5.
Sorbent materials includl11g pads, booms, etc. are maintained near the Wash Plant, near Tanks NO.1 and
No.2, in the aboveground shop and in the underground shop in case of a discharge. In addition,
aggregate fines may also suffice to contain/absorb a discharge until it can be properly cleaned up.
6.
As amended by the December 2006 revised rules, secondary containment is not requucd for mobile oil-
fIlled equipment. Mobile eqUIpment used aboveground is parked near the aboveground shop during
non-operating hours. Likewise, mobile equipment used in the underground mine is parked adjacent to
the underground shop when not m use. In each case a discharge could be readily contained due to the
flat topography and nearby adsorbenUabsorbent materials.
17
spec Plall - North Indianapolis - Updated 03108
Revision 3: 10/2007
,0
u
u
o
o
u
u
o
u
o
u
o
[J
o
u
~
u
u
[j
[J
Facility management has detennined that use of secondary containment for the aboveground storage tanks and
containers greater than or equal to 55 gallons meet the rule requirements. In instances where secondary
containment is not practical (i.e., containers greater than or equal to 55 gallons on mobile equipment and tank
truck refueling area), site topography, diversionary structures and readily available on-site spill response
equipment and matenals are practical and effective to prevent a discharge of petroleum products from reaching
navigable waters at this facility. As mentioned previously, mobile equipment are parked on flat topography
when not in use with absorbent materials close by. In the underground mine, drill hole plugs are available to
plug drainage holes that would allow spills to enter the lower mme level and then Lower Sump No. l.
18
spec Plan - North Indianapolis - Upd>led 03103
Revision 3 1012007
[J
u
u
:u~ 1
"
u
U'
, .
o
u
u
[J
o
o
u
u
u
o
D
u
o
1.
Daily visual inspections consist of a complete walkthrough of the facility to check for tank
damage or leakage, stained or discolored soils, excessive accwnulation of precipitation within
diked areas, and to ensure the containment drain valve(s) are securely closed. If applicable, all
electrical items containing dielectric fluid shall be periodically checked for leaks. Appropnate
labels identifying the fluid contained in the item shall be affixed to the outside of the item in
clear view.
2.
Monthly inspections are provided for applicable ASTs using the checklist provided in
Appendix A. These inspections and should be completed by the Plant Manager and/or other
competent personnel under his supervision. Records of these inspections, along with any
corrective actions taken should be maintained on-site for a continuous three (3) year peflod.
3.
\\There applicable, physical electronic/electrical testing of liquid level sensing devices are done
and documented monthly on the checklist provided in Appendix A. There are no underground
storage tanks at this facility. Bulk Storage Tanks and piping inside of secondary containment
and with all sides visible are not integrity tested but instead are visually inspected on a monthly
basis for external signs of leaks, corrosion, pitting or deterioration.
4.
For ASTs that do not meet the above criteria, integrity testing will be conducted in accordance
with the Steel Tank Institute (ST!) Standard SPOOl-OO. The written procedures for that type of
testing are provided in that standard.. To aid in the determination of whether the AST requires
integrity testmg, consult Appendix E for specifics 011 which type of integrity testing and
frequency may be applicable to that AST. All integrity test records will be maintained at the
facility for a period consistent with the last round of testing (i. e., 5, 10 or 20 years).
19
spec Plan - North Jodianapolis - Updated 03/0S
Revi,ion 3: 10/2007
u
" ,
u
( 1
LJ
1. Oil-handling personnel are trained in the operation and maintenance of equipment to prevent
discharges; discharge procedure protocols; applicable pollution control laws and regulations;
general facility operations; and the contents of the facility SPCC Plan.
u
o
2. The Plant Manager, or his secondary appointee, has primary responsibility for oil spill
prevention.
o
3. Initial training and subsequent briefings are to be provided by management for all oil-handling
personnel to ensure adequate understanding of the components of this spec Plan and its
requirements. Such components consisting of discharge prevention and cleanup, lOspection of
equipment and AST integrity will be provided at a minimum of once per year, typically during
Annual Refresher Training.
[J
u
o
u
u
o
u
u
r l
U
I'
U
o
o
o
20
spec Plan - NortllllldiollOpoli, - lJpdated 03/08
Revision 3: 10/2007
u
u
o
1. Fencing, or other alternative means of access restnctlOn is provided, where appropriate, to deter
unauthorized entry. The site is not entirely fenced due to its large area, however, the site is inspected on
a daily basis by an off-duty member of the Carmel Police Department.
U' .
I
2. Master flow and drain valves are to be locked in the closed position except during authorized secondary
containment drainage.
u
o
3. Electrical starter controls for the oil pumps are locked in the "off' position and are to be located in an
area accessible only to authorized personnel when the pumps are in a non-operating status.
4. The loading and unloading connections of oil piping are capped when not in service or when in standby
service for an extended period oftime.
o
5. Lighting near the tanks is adequate for operating needs and to discourage vandalism. It is sufficient to
identify and allow recovery of spills in those areas. At other areas additional lighting will likely be
necessary. If a contractor is involved with the cleanup, they will have supplemental lighting.
o
u
lJ
u
o
il
U
o
u
u
u
u
u
21
spec Plan - North Indianapolis - Updated OJ/OS
Revis ion 3: 10/2007
u
u
u
D
u
o
u
u
o
u
n
u
o
u
u
[j
o
u
u
u
1. This facility does not use a tank car or tanker truck unloading rack
2. As a deviation to this section, secondary containment is not provided at this facility for vendor tank
truck offloading. Tank~ are generally located on flat areas with spill kits close by. Procedures for
shutting off pumps, and utilizing absorbent materials and a contractor, are in place.
3. A vendor's tank truck unloading procedures shall meet the minimum requirements and regula60ns
established by the Department of Transportation's Regulations contained under 49 CFR 171,173,174,
177 and 179.
4. A physical barrier, warning sign, or wheel chocks, is a method that may be used in loading/unloading
areas to deter vehicles from departing before complete disconnection of oil transfer lines. If this method
is utilized, it is the vendor's responsibility to ensure that a safety cone is placed before unloading and
removed after disconnect is complete.
5. In instances where fueling/lubricating of company equipment can only occur outside of secondary
containment, a spill containment kit shall be available.
6. The fueled/lubricated vehicle's lowermost drain plug, along with any other leak outlet, shall be
examined after filling and before leaving the service area.
7. Delivery tankers should be inspected before and after unloading to verify quantity received. Drivers are
to remain with then tankers during the entire unloading penod and should never venture further than 25
feet from theIr vehicle during fuel transfer. Petrolewn product vendors shall provide some means to
clean up any incidental spillage.
8. Equipment operators are to remain with their equipment at all times during refueling.
9. The diesel tank in the underground mine (Tank No. 13) is filled from the surface via a vertical pipe.
Due to this configuration the vendor cannot see the tank. When filling this tank, Martin Marietta
personnel are stationed with the vendor at the fill port and at the tank to avoid overfilling the tank.
Since this section is typically applicable to tanks greater then 50,000 gallons, it does not apply to this facility.
The discharge prevention and containment standards are in conformance with the minimum standards under 40
CFR 112 and all applicable State rules, regulations and guidelines.
22
SPCC Plan - North Indianapolis - Updated 03/08
Revision 3: 10/2007
u
u
o
This Plan was developed to complement the facility's NPDES Permit No. ING490012, as applicable.
u
1. Drainage from concrete containment is restrained by locking valves to prevent a discharge from
entering into the facility's drainage system.
u
o
2. Valves of open-and-closed manual design are used to drain diked areas. The exterior dramage
valve is equipped with a locking device and should only be unlocked and opened to drain
accumulated precipitation in accordance with the Containment Drainage Log (App. B). After
drainage is complete, re-Iocking ofthe drainage valve is mandatory.
3. In the event of a discharge and/or overflow from a tank, the discharge should be contained
within the containment structure. If a discharge occurs during transfer, or in a manner that
cannot be contained within the diked area, surface drainage is as indicated in Figure 2.
o
4.
Facility drainage systems are adequate to prevent oil from reaching navigable water in the event
of a discharge. Procedures are in place to shut off pumps, and utilize absorbent materials and a
contractor, as necessary. Special emphasis is placed on preventing spills from reaching Blue
Woods Creek
[J
o
o
[J
o
o
o
u
o
u
o
o
23
SPCC Plan - North Indi.napoli, - Updated 03108
Revision 3: 1012007
o
u
u
0)
u
1.
2.
u
3.
o
o
o
u
o
u
o
;)
u
u
u
u
u
o
u
Each aboveground tank is constructed of a matenal that is compatible with the material stored
within and the conditions of storage (i.e., pressure, temperature, etc.).
Most aboveground tanks are provided '\vith secondary containment with and available storage
volume sufficient to contain the capacity of the largest single tank stored withm, plus sufficient
freeboard.
Drainage of rainwater from diked areas, bypassing treatment, is acceptable if:
1. The bypass valve is normally sealed closed.
11. Accumulated precipitation is inspected to ensure compliance with applicable water
quality standards and will not cause a harmful discharge.
1ll. The bypass valve is opened and resealed under responsible supervision.
IV. Records are kept of drainage events on the form shown in Appendix B.
4.
Aboveground tanks are VIsually inspected on a daily basis. Documented visual inspections are
to be performed monthly in accordance with the Tank Inspection Log (Appendix A) and should
include inspection of the tank(s), tank supports and foundations, and containment structure(s).
Monthly visual inspections of AST integrity alone are deemed sufficient for the ASTs. Intemal
corrosion poses minimal risk of failure. These include all shop fabricated (less then 50,000
gallons) ASTs in which all sides are visible (i.e., no ground contact).
Equi valent environmental protection is accomplished by the use of secondary containment,
good housekeeping practices, and a thorough inspection program designed to evaluate
applicable ASTs for potential signs of corrosion, leakage or cracking-
5.
For ASTs that do not meet the above criteria, integrity testing in accordance WIth Steel Tank
lnstitute Standard SPOOOl-OO, or other similar standard in existence at the time in which testing
is performed, will be perf01111ed at a mmimum every ten (10) years.
6.
There are no steam operated internal heating coils at this facility.
7.
Each AST has been engineered or updated in accordance with good engineering practices to
provide overfill protection by the presence of a direct-reading level gauge. Other acceptable
means of level gauging include high liquid level alanns, high level pump cutoffs, and overflow
lines.
8.
There are no "effluent treatment facilities" at this facility.
9.
Visible discharges which result in a loss of oil from the container (including seams, gaskets,
piping, pumps, valves, flvets, bolts, etc.) must be promptly collected and any accumulations of
oil properly removed and disposed of through an a used oil recycler approved by the
Environmental Representative.
10.
Any mobile or portable oil storage container greater than or equal to 55 gallons, shall be located
to prevent a discharge of oil to navigable waterways and provided with secondary containment
or equivalent environmental protection. Equivalent environmental protection may be
accomplished by natural topography, diversion berms or catch basins. Mobile or portable
containers greater than or equal to 55 gallons are to be located in areas not subject to periodic
flooding.
24
spec Plan - North Indianapolis - Updated 03/08
R~vjs ion 3: 1 012007
o
u
u
1.
There is no buried piping at this facility. Cathodic protection and integrity testing will be
provided if any buried piping is installed at a later date.
D
2.
Piping not in service or on standby for an extended period is to be capped and marked at the
terminal connection.
3.
All pipe supports are properly designed to minimize abrasion and corrosion and to allow for
expansion and contraction.
u
4.
Aboveground valves, piping and appurtenances are visually inspected by operating personnel on
a daily basis. The general condition of items including joints, pipeline supports, catch pans,
locking valves and metal surfaces are to be assessed. Documented visual inspections are
performed monthly in accordance with the Tank Inspection Log (Appendix A).
o
o
5.
There is no aboveground piping or other oil transfer operation located within vehicle travel
areas. In addition, verbal wamings are admlmstered as needed as to the location of oil storage
operations.
o
o
u
u
o
o
u
u
u
o
u
u
25
SPCC Plan - North Indianapolis - Updated OJ/08
Revision 3: 10/2007
o
u
u
o
o
Oil/water separators used exclusively to treat wastewater and not used to satisfy any requirement of 40 CFR part
112 are exempt from all SPCC requirements. Oil/water separators used to meet the secondary containment
requirements of the rule are not exempt. Examples of oil/water separators that are used to meet spec
requirements include oil/water separators used to satisfy the secondary containment requirements of 112.7(c),
112.7(h)(1), 112.8(c)(2), 112.8(c)(11), 112.l2(c)(2), and/or 112.12(c)(l1).
This facility does not operate any oil water separators.
u
o
o
o
u
u
o
o
u
o
u
o
u
u
26
spec Plan - Nor,h Indianapolis - Updated 03/08
Revision 3: IOi2007
o
c
u
o
o
o
u
u
u
LJ
o
o
u
o
u
u
u
o
o
Facility Name:
North Indianapolis
Facility Address:
4700 East 96th Street, Indianapolis. IN 46240
1. Does the facility transfer oil over water to or from vessels and does the facility have a total oil storage
capacity greater than or equal to 42,OOO-gallons?
Yes
No
./
2. Does the facility have a total oil storage capacity greater than or equal 1 million gallons and does the
facility lack secondary containment that is sufficiently large to contain the capacity of the largest
aboveground oil storage tank plus sufficient freeboard to allow for precipitation within any aboveground
011 storage tank area?
Yes
No
./
3. Does the facility have a total oil storage capacity greater than or equal to 1 million gallons and is the
facility located at a distance (as calculated usmg the appropriate formula in Attachment C-lII to this
appendix or a comparable formulal) such that a discharge from the facility could cause injury to fish and
wildlife and sensitive envlromnents? For further description of fish and wildlife and sensitive
environments, see Appendices 1. II, and III to DOC/NOAA's "Guidance for Facility and Vessel
Response Plans: Fish and Wildlife and Sensitive Environments: (see Appendix E to this part, section
10, for availability) and the applicable Area Contingency Plan.
Yes
No
./
4. Does the facility have a total oil storage capaCIty greater than or equal to 1 million gallons and is the
facility located at a distance (as calculated using the appropnate fOlTIlula in Attachment C-III to this
appendix or a comparable formula!) such that a discharge from the facility would shut dovvn a public
drinking water intake2?
Yes
No
./
5.
Does the facility have a total oil storage capacity greater than or equal to 1 million gallons and has the
facility experienced a reportable oil spill in an amount greater than or equal to lO,OOO gallons within the
last 5 years?
Yes
No
./
Certification:
I certify that under penalty oflaw that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information
submitted in this document, and that based on my inquiry of those individuals responsible for obtaining
this information, I believe that the submitted information is true, accurate, and complete.
D. Max Williams
. Name (please type.oif2nt)
])1 Jl1~ 7J~
Signature
Senior Environmental Engineer
Title
March] 9, 2008
Date
'If a comparable fonnula is used documentation of the reliability and analytical soundnes5 of the comparable fonnula must be attached.
2For the purposes of 40 CFR pa11112, public drinking water intakes are analogous to public water systems as described at 40 CFR 143.2 (c).
27
spec Plan - North Indianapo]is - Updated 03/08
Revision 3: 10/2007
o
u
u
u
o
o
o
u
D
o
o
o
u
o
u
u
u
o
u
I have read this Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure Plan and agree to adhere to and perform
the actiVities required by the plan to the best of my ability. Any part of the plan to which I do not
understand, I have contacted the Environmental Department for guidance.
Plant Managcr, D(H;:;~'~~ Date, 3/;9M
Ba Benson
Assistant Plant Manager:
Date:
Foreman:
Date:
Foreman:
Date:
Other:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
28
spec Pla.n - N0I1h Indian.pnlis - Updated 03/08
Revision 3: 10/2007
TANK INSPECTION CHECKLIST
In"roctim'" Th~ cccmd ,bould be completed monthly. Vimal1y ""pcct ,,,,h tank, pl",jng an"/ in th, apP''Ol''ja'' bo'
for each item If any item needs explanation, do so in the space provided, or attach additional sheet jf necessary
DATE:
INSPECTOR:
LOCATION:
North lndiana olis
CORRECTlV E ACTION/COMMENTS
o
Fuel dispenser nozzle(s) are locked wben not in use
Dispenser hose connections leaking
Drip Marks evident below tank
Discoloration of Tank coatings caused by leaks or
corrosion (especially tank bottom)
Corrosion, pitting or rust evident on tank exterior
Cracks or damage to tank walls, seams, rivets or bolts
Tank supports deteriorated or buckled
Gaps between tank and foundation
Water seals between tank & supports is damaged
Level control devices, vent devices & overspill control
devices are in place & operating properly (must check)
WateI/product in interstice of double-wall timk
Containment No(s).
Cracks in walls or floor
Puddles containing discharged or leaked material
inside containment
Any setthng evident
Damage caused by vegetation roots
YES NO
N/A
*See next page for additiOllal comment space
Tanks No(!>).
J
J
]
J
u
r )
U
piping
Droplets of stored material evident below piping
Discoloration or corrosion of piping
If any underground piping, is piping protected?
Integrity testing perfonned on underground piping
(mention last test date)
Bowing of pipe between supports
Evidence of stored material seepage from valves,
joints, unions, couplings or seals
General comments
Notes: One form per containment is required. Identify Tank No. in Comment Column when a problem is found.
u
I
:U
- 1
\U
( I,
\U
I
U
\
29
Revi,ion 3: 10/2007
spec Plan ~ North Indianapolis - Updated 03/08
TANK INSPECTION CHECKLIST (cont'd)
\ I
U
J
J
J
J
- \
J
-1
~
u
: -1
U
u
o
I 'l
U
\
tD
30
Revision 3: 10/2007
spec Pl.n ~ North Indianapolis - Updated 0310&
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT DRAINAGE LOG
40 CFR 112 REQUIRES A CONTINUOUS WATCH WHEN DRAINING RAIN WATER FROM AN"Y
PETROLEUM SEC01\'DARY CONTAINMENT FACILITY. ANY OIL PRESENT ON THE WATER
SURF ACE MUST BE REMOVED PRIOR TO OPENING THE DISCHARGE VALVE. IT IS IMPORT ANT
TO KEEP THE STRUCTURE CLEAN AND WELL MATNT AlliED TO AVOID OIL CaNT AMINA TION,
MY SIGNATURE BELOW CERTIFIES THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THE CONTAINMENT FACILITY,
REMOVED ANY VISIBLE OIL FROM THE WATER SURFACE, REPAIRED OR REPORTED ALL
LEAKS, AND CLOSED AND LOCKED THE CONTAINMENT DRAIN VALVE PRIOR TO DEPARTURE.
I
]
J
."....,. "OjhEff~s'~iff:,0 ~~.)~'~d' DTarn(~W}~.[~til~~~?:.' ,-;-,,:', . ,',
;', ~ : ~ ,';
;,' ,/,,,,..). . ." . '&M~~tRiB~;"i,t1 ' 'f;r''''''T''~'' I.' 'Sig]" .......,
}~"..DQ~a.tj9ri' "i"un~'",," " T,',Jlf,:'l.t:til'e; :
J
J
"
J
J
o
o
o
o
o
*Tms RECORD MUST BE KEPT ON FILE FOR A MINIMUM OF THREE (3) YEARS.
*To approximate the volume of water drained from the structure, multiply the depth of standing water by the
containment dimensions (all dimensions should be in feet). Multiply the volume by 7.48 to convert to gallons.
31
Revision 3, ] 012DD7
spec Plan - North lndianapolis - Updalcd 03/08
DETAILED DISCHARGE REPORT FORM
Reporter's Name and Date:
Location of Discharge:
Date and Time Discharge Occurred:
Material and Amount Discharged:
Source of the Release:
Cause and Circumstances of Release:
Countermeasures to Contain and Clean-up Discharge:
Personnel/Agency Contacted Regarding Discharge Procedures:
, Corrective Actions Implemented to Prevent Recurrence of Discharge:
Discharge Report Sent To:
32
spec Plan - North Indianapolis - Updated 03iO~
Revision 3: 10/2007
RECORD OF DISCHARGE PREVENTION BRIEFINGS
Instruction: Briefings will be scheduled and conducted by the ovmer or operators for operating personnel at
intervals frequent enough to assure adequate understanding of the spec Plan for this facility. These briefings
should also highlight and describe known discharge events or failures, malfunctioning components, and recently
developed precautionary measures. Persoooel will also be instructed in operation and maintenance of
equipment to prevent the discharges of oil and applicable pollution contTOllaws, rules and regulations. Dunng
these bnefings there will be an opportunity for facility operators and other persoooel to share recommendations
concerning health, safety, and environmental issues encountered during operation of the facility.
Date:
Attendees:
Subject and Issues:
Recommendations
and suggestions:
33
SPCC Plan- North I"dianapolis - Updated 03/08
Revision 3: 10/2007
SPPC PLAN TRAINING
The following pages are the attendance lists from the January 2008 Annual
Refresher training classes. spec Plan training was included as a part of
these classes. Topics covered included:
. A review of the rule, reporting limits and wellhead protection issues.
iii Statistics regarding the number of spills nationally and in various
EP A Regions.
,. Examples of costs and penalties for spills.
o A presentation prepared by IDEM's Office of Emergency Response.
,. Company policy regarding draining of oil.
__...~m.c..".~_C."O-;=:;~=~">_
~,..-
Indiana District
2008 Refresher Training
Sign In Sheet
1/11/2008
Surface
Cloverdale
Orville Fitch
Jr. Crowe
Dan Smith
Joe Duncan ,,-.
Brooks Lear
Eric Wheeler
Mike Shew
Mickey Tincher
Mike Mote
Wayne Jeffers
Belmont
Brian Cross !;:~:),/ " t, ,.<,//".!) I
George Hoagland }b;~,~~,,-~!. 'i/fd..."c~:;:~i.~~), .'
Jason Mclain ~>'i:,Ji cP'~ -,,~.~~ .~.-i;'('
Waverly'-;';;'
::;/f:" ;; .<.~:7 .,
Mike Bradley ,/;::;-'{'.fijr5.<:.-<-/ ..../
Kelly Hacker'~1;';.i~~ /i//')L/l
Donnie Norris JJ)(,.'t(vi/(;'~ Z:/t-!:::;""""
Steve Dean cc-G(/~"'':'' /...k'A,-,L-
M::, Noblesville Sand till '
. _'n'i-''''~'eJ. ~ '" " -~ Jt{t{ tJ.~t{JJ1{,2l
Steve Rambo ,.y;.:. ) /':"f!..j~
Carmel Sand ~ 0
Jerry Crane ,.\.t,Vv-'\ \ ~ ..'-_ fJ
~ \ --
Underground
:t~h:;er .4i:!ff01.1j'"pf//~.
I Rob Dunn 'j:;;:r~:-3:"';)--~
(Ray Hibbard !&~.,-,,;.,--.!i~_'f-ff::>:.' 2.-:/7
,~~~~n:~i~:~nner,~j~~l2~ _--;~;:;sz: ~
Drillers \'-J i.' 11\' i,', rt"""<"
. \. /' 'J "
David Campbell I:'.Y_.~-,;...-: f~~~-"-"~'t '. "'--"J..,./
Rick Johnson /Z~LL- j//"M~\"~
Indiana DistriC~ ' ; (1/; ( , '" 'I {'
John Sosnowski iu-:'(.',~F' ,..t.';" "~"7c.~t.~,
..r.ll' //_y~' , ,~I U /:'
Max vvlulSms ,/:'l? ICy.' I~i:( ).',,4f>';"~
Tom Begley ~ /~,,,.p'"
Scott Woodard ~,;:, c I (' l.~':~J~. ~ ',,;\.
/'-:; . ,t/J"' /'
,? ./ '1,'.r7 _ _~--~
:-"-,-/,?-"...~/ ~'?~~
,,' -;if ,-
r _,.. ,
r.'~:~~~:~!;Z;- ",~;'l<__,7/
UP-t~--' \0:., '.~ f LJ....,/';~~,:/1: /.\_i"'.....,
P '-L) " " - I, '::'1!' -
" -'" i .r:'f-'l"',;, ,'..;-tl_, ',. '
J::-' i:/ 1::;-
; ,....- ... .r .,1' .......--J-L~-' ~,,_.-_f..f":"'-"
..-~, 1 'J <--- J~' ~.~ .
If! !//.'i. ,. )~"pt.'__"
,;_;r:J~l;J:f:~;?:f:< ..
le,./' d.. Yl:!.. --r .,/ y~' .I~,_,.7 -~/t"' .-.~
(.i'<'~~,"
Joel White
B~an Carlson
Jolbn Headlee
Glenda Fennell
Kokomo Stone
Bob Dyer
Scott Bracken
Seth McCully
ij-,~~)tf~~~;' c. z,1 7[
,) i~. r->r' Co t\ _C-t2:1,VI/...."
.>\J /.,f""JN/l. /r~~,;;lJ:.,:;.f:~~~
~-\. \J:u__J:~;'/~,~~ " (',-_~_....~{.J~-, ~'"-
-? j /f ili ~
'D ,'''I 'I !,y i1 A'\/
6. . 6~~o'-k-:.v.__-
.~.':vL /f L-:':Vf;:-~~-
NI R~ fl-;;;"L.!7 rvt",rf~'(;, /;l,(.r;;.C]", 1f:';;"'D/>7/
Rob Goldman ,td.j;..,J' .d~;j!.}v~~,,"-'\..
Contractors , /' t/ /Z Tod Eberle -,,'/..:.:;,-~~ ~,-'z:/~-;/ b--:::'~
Watson Electric i I '//~. --.,. ~--, Brett Wissel 1?-:5-tt: /)/::;c:{ ., ( .
Nick Watson It'ftr//"I t./~/ Bill Holding / ,~)//// ;':'c,-Cr:l.._
Hydra-Sharp i' t/) ,W;? .~'" Electricians { /7'" "'/-~'';'}~'~-;;
Dave Clayton /(/w.? ('///J~' Steve Carroll ,,4,.;;' :"-~/ L<-.~~'://
Foursome construction.;:! /J" . /r"// /../' B2~ ~offman ku..;.{ , ICI-;::..n""---.,-
Shawn Taulman 4/~'i:'d-"----- V/~.. ,/~:'" -f" _----Orvlslon ('\, /7\ '/ ' /~i
v '-" -. Don Head / //1]::; 'f .\f-".I ..;7.1'1/ .
Kokomo Stone /:/. ,.. ~. /1/'-
Ron Moeller -f:/)?:77? 1r1.r:x-<j:~~ ../'
~:~~~I~~~strom -/d;;;' (~~~,~~t<') <.:-'/'-
Dave Metcalf l--J;-;F:'~~~
James Abbott
Gary Bolen
Kevin Chapman
Curtis Massey
Tim Singleton
Noblesville Stone
Allen Chumley
(~~:tt';.~2 / l:? ~~c?~~'~~
u/ it\.~,-v~' \ ) J~) ',_(~i \.-~/
~/_. -( -\ 1 .,;j
,~.--.....,., .'J;__~;l:-_..r,r,,-~
./~;A.k fi%.~~r?
'"-"" ',i. t.::
-r~J.~_ A)'h~_ill' .....~-......
I
17 -Jan-OB
<e'ntucky Avenue
Jussia, Mark
vlcGulre, Corey
iopson, William
raylor 1 Russ
3osnowski, Jim
Vlahoney, Chris
:Zobertson, And rew
3ould, Scott
Nh itsett, Jeff
\ltuJryan, Matt
~arter, Matt
:Jurvts1 Glenn
Naltz, Jason
::ondon, Michael
V1ontgomery, Michaer
Villain, Jim
Nilliams, Lee
t\loblesville Stone
~andy M'artin
=d Bausman
3rad Cohee.
~oger Mckinney
~ )ger So-I is
\Jathan Roberts
Steve Taylor
Indiana District
2008 Refresher Training
Sign fn Sheet
""
_\.' ~''''.
~ ~.~
~~........~.~...
,.-:7 ________.~
.~
Indiana District
2008 Refresher Training
Sign In Sheet
1/24/2008
KY Avenue - / !.~ r }/.-:'-:-- QC
F ed Ki )'--.,. , /J/ S H'lb
r ng ~ -" ~,-,---:",' ;/L'~-"1-! 'J ean I ert
Roger Nolley I::. :Y) Joei-titbet1
L"-'k.- '" ~;j. '" , KYA
.............. . Lln'i"'""f!enf" ~;E:<k'" ..A venue
John Whalen, :.'~,{fli Ii^- I\.J." (.-I.-v' "y... Joe Kellermeyer ~ H2.fl:.hJ',,~<-/~-,
Chris Barnhill L~'i ~ .' : tf...w.kC(,' . /" Nob~"l're-"v' ..), f. [.~:. / l.lj:".--.:'----"-
Jeff Snodgrass .;"k/.' ..L,;.....J,.'5t{~h'2?~U Mark Loman fY1 A RI!5.. (o:;iYl AN
George Allen .;? . / d1.u:7.;~~/ iJJ!f6:v.,l\~ Dennis Brooks ;!Jk.........""-~7J:/-.. /("-(C'..Jf.,.A
Isaac Perez i<f?.i1z...,flJ C \ '::O,c-l I-.. John Grimes 4-2~ J~7P
~=:~n .l,(); '!!J ' .... Ji ~::~~ ~=-eda 4lW,7; ~ ~i ~d a .
Frank Clark c?(A~/L / .41/--V Albert Guy =j'/l.l,/.._-e..e~''''~t',,~t:':::; v ^"'i
Indiana District "~_",--::--"'" ..... ~ Troy Dilley _ ~~--:--. ~-
AI Witty -~~~~ Matt Schwent ' "
Drillers'--' ,.. ;'." ~ Me:--rafker '''''r..(>J~$-.s,&vt;; //{.---IL~
Carlson ~~'?!"c:.~ ~(.,l;~~,~'_-' lndiana District / /J
Jeff Gillum /2' . ,/J..,.~ Ken Parsons b/--:'vfLvO [.-~
Weihe Engineering /'(/,. Ed Gehr l.~d .<,~ !~,: M' ['.A' .
Gary Kendall /~~' .L-d~. j c1 a !:~!~~A::.J..e: ^''I ~
Jeff Penf1lngton d)~. ~ A;:: ".'-' '. - r:z / ;JJ.L! u. ~ ',~_.,,"-
Zach Farre. 1I 1.dc. ;~/...a. ui.eu..- . ~\ '.t,'"fi.':<'7~~hv,-'--:.Ii/'t'-'.#.\.~'.e..... i.~~~~~"" 7~-""". . 'r
Mark Swanson lVl. JW..-.k.. \s. Wn-91 \-:\ :::::C. fl. I. s), If rJ :, /" / J2.n /
Nt .-? ~v.t..- {{&LIC./".., ;~. .... .' '."I/~.-"
<.-oLsON fl1"" v -Ib' 1/1 ' . ".' I - ~
~'Mf'/ ~,-..1t8n ( v~JJ-~ }vf?"'f "
Greg Moorhous &.A-"c. /"7 ,/>'?=7fi,..~ !
Division ,.-:--.( \). "
Phil Whtte '........ ~~_,'\J~~ U,~l.(~::-~,
Hydra Sharp .J ,1
Chris Clayton (J./<" - 1---<- 7~
Foursome Const. P
Jeff T aulman
Josh Taulman
luke Shultz
Keith Scott
Noblesville Stone
Mike Nichols
Wiehe Engineering
Steve Dickol/er
Jim Dial
Craig Clark
S-,,",,,, \"f\ ,\.\\ r.r;-': .
':':>-V4 "n;i~";::"'. ~ f. ......c.-<
/::jI/t'/7 /t/ )/n //,/J.:' /'- .)J/fZ~
/
25-Jan-08
Belmont
Rex Clay
Waymond Spears
Kevin Spiker
Miguel Sepulveda
Tim Price
James Rosine
Cloverdale
d0e Tucker'
8-ebey..:HRGber--
Cannel Sand
Jason Oikowski
~€Hv- ..
Noblesville Sand
Mike Jones
Waverly
Sarge
Steve Blythe
KY Avenue
Jim Hulse
Marl< Hardwick
Gary Fenley
Brad Samm
Steve Hunter
Mike Rumple
Sam Randolph
Marvin Felker
Can Chambers
Josh Harris
Tim Matlock
Darryl Clements
Leroy Sutton
Robert Cope
Electricians
Jimmy Smith
Brad Milburn
Noblesville Stone
Dalil'Yl ~(;>. '-
Crussie White
Travis Barnhill
Indiana District
2008 Refresher Training
Sign In Sheet
Noblesville Stone
f2c.1 !l[//l~ /' Barry Hayes
~o:.../--.-.~~ _ .._:::..;:~~_...............__Mike Gook
/21; .It .If-~., J7 . ~ Ste~ling Cavalier
~i8j~./:fJ0~"'.J...:....r:.-2,.ec'- .. Chns Young
3-"/fld:.::'-::::, '/ Matt Clark
/ /J ..\~u...:,.-; Charlie Robinson
Brian Mullins
Nathan Welch
Nick Barnhill
Tom Beeman
Matt Ailor
Alfred Parks
Darryl Parks
Steve Martin
Keith Eldridge
Barry Benson
Gary Gordon
Clark Bollinger
Alien Chumley
NI
De=~l1S~
~1s00-~~lj7,w ;-; l'Y-'J 71;.- ~T;:....,_ -
Wiehe Engineering '\
Rory Bryndalf Roy-, 1 lJr\/'ftJ:.eJ
N.r .,-' j2r .." I I. I .,
.....~J
7)...." L. ':- '- Ji Yfj
k f ck.- ~{;:'Y~I{ --4 A:L~ .. '7 .~"",,=,.,.-
l' ., . -~~ 'f~' (b '. ' -
b..J....-1_ '-., -.~--"""--c'~' ~~
'y .. ..
~J:PI-L<JL~"
~./_~k-:' !/
f
2008 Refresher Training
Sign In Sheet
Feb. 18,2008
Noblesville Sand
Larry Murdock
Jeremy Delph
Michael Welch
Dale Green
Paul Linville
Cannel Sand
Tony Ngo
John Harville
Ronn ie Pickering
North Indianapolis
Adam McLa in
John Lenon
Brian Willis
Tim Coverdale
Dave DavIs
Brett Rose
Warden May
Richard Hudson
Rick Hall
Bob Thacker
Brad Cook
Greg Elder
Theodore Mize
Jimmy Robinson
Bill Kemp
Adam Rosichan
Rick Thompson
Roscoe May
Jan Dawson
Dan Howell
Randy Watson
Glen Tillery
Ed Harville
Rick Rogers
Edward Hibbard
Dan Smith
Trevor Scott
Elton Dean
Charles Roberson
Harbro's Welding
Les HaNey
Chris Harvey
~~
I
oj;_ M ..~~^
tt~~~~
::f.;1 h~i1 '0J j I!J;
~.~~
~ 'ZA-....J ~ o~
13r- r.
~..."
o . ."
. ,
--.
~.:; c-J?.. ..
L/~ E~~~;;((
,}-. {' Iu-J. .
?J?et I -
6i ~1M~
~~-
C - . -
. ~~ c<i.. ~.
Determination of AST Category
TANK HAS AST
TANK CONFIGURATION CRDM*? CA TEGORY**
AST in contact with ground No 2or3
Elevated tank with spill control and with no part of AST in Yes 1
contact with ground
Vertical tank with RPB and spill control Yes 1
Vertical tank with double bottom and spill control Yes 1
Vertical tank with RPB under tank and spill control Yes 1
Double-walled AST Yes 1
AST with a secondary containment dikelbellll Yes 1
**Category 1 - ASTs w/spill control and w/CRDM
* * Category 2 - ASTs w/spill control but w/a CRDM
* * Category 3 - ASTs wlo spill control and wlo CRDM
. *CDRM - a means of detecting a release of liquid through inherent design. It is passive because it does not require
sensors Or power to operate. Liquid releases are visually detected by facility opemtors. The system shall be designed in
accordwu.:e with good engineering practice. Several acceptable (lnd commonly used CRDM systems are as follows:
. Release p,-evention barrier (RPB) desaibed in definition of release prevention barrier.
. Secondmy containment AST including double-wall AST or double-bottom AST
. Elevated AST with release prevention barrier described in definitions of elevated AST and release preventIOn barrier.
INSPECTION SCHEDU LES
AST Type and Size (U.S. gallons) Category 1 Category 2 Category 3
o - 1 ,100 P P P, E & L(10)
[P, E&L(5), 1(10)]
1,101 - 5,000 P P,E&L(10) or
ShDp~Fabricated ASTs [P, L(2), E(5)1
[P, E(10), 1(20)] [P, E&L(5), 1(10)]
5,001 - 30,000 P, E(20) or or
[P, E(5), L(i0H [P, L(i), E(5)]
30,001 - 50,000 P, E(20) P, E & L(5), 1(15) P, E & L(5), 1(10)
Portable Containers P P P**
H Owner shall either discontinue use of portable container for storage or have the portable container DOT (Department
of Transportation) tested and recertified per the following schedule: Plastic - every 7 years Steel - every 12 years
Stainless Steel - every 17 years
P - Periodic AST inspection by Owner's Inspector (this is not a Certified Inspector)
E - Formal external inspection by Sled Tank Institute (STT) Certified Inspector
I - Formal internal inspection by STI Certified Inspector
L - leak test by OViner or owner's designee
( ) indicates maximum inspection interval in years. Eg., E (5) indicates formal cxtcmal inspection every 5 years
34
SPCC PIJn - Nonh Indianapoli, - Updated 031f}8
Revision 3: 10/2007
Containment Volume Calculations
35
spec Plan - North Illdiollapoli5 - Updaled 03/0S
Revision 3: 1012007
NORTH INDIANAPOLIS spec PLAN
CONTAINMENT VOLUME CALCULATIONS
TANK NO.
TANK CONTENTS
TANK VOLUME
CONTAINMENT SIZE
L=
w=
D=
CONVERSION FACTOR =
24-HR, 25-YR STORM EVENT =
CONTAINMENT VOLUME =
24-HR, 25-YR STORM VOLUME =
REQUIRED VOLUME =
1
Diesel
10,000 GAL
28
20
3
7.48
4.8
12,566
1,676
11,676
FT
FT
FT
GALlCU FT
IN
GAL
GAL
GAL
TANK NO.
TANK CONTENTS
TANK VOLUME
CONTAINMENT SIZE
2
Gasoline
1,000 GAL
None. Double-walled tank.
TANK NO.
TANK CONTENTS
TANK VOLUME
CONTAINMENT SIZE
L=
w=
D=
CONVERSION FACTOR =
24-HR, 25-YR STORM EVENT =
CONTAINMENT VOLUME =
24-HR, 25-YR STORM VOLUME =
REQUIRED VOLUME =
3
Crusher oil
550 GAL
7.92 FT
4.83 FT
2.5 FT
7.48 GALlCU FT
4.8 IN
715 GAL
N/A. Containment has a roof.
550 GAL
TANK NO.
4
Tank was removed
TANK NO.
TAN K CONTENTS
TANK VOLUME
CONTAINMENT SIZE
L=
w=
D=
CONVERSION FACTOR =
24-HR, 25-YR STORM EVENT =
CONTAINMENT VOLUME =
24-HR, 25-YR STORM VOLUME =
REQUIRED VOLUME =
5
Used oil
550 GAL
8 FT
5.08 FT
2.5 FT
7.48 GALlCU FT
4.8 IN
760 GAL
N/A. Containment has a roof.
550 GAL
NORTH INDIANAPOLIS spec PLAN
CONTAINMENT VOLUME CALCULATIONS
TANK NO.
TANK CONTENTS
TANK VOLUME
CONTAINMENT SIZE
24-HR, 25-YR STORM EVENT =
6
Antifreeze
250 GAL
None. Tank is inside shop on concrete floor.
NJA
TANK NO.
TANK CONTENTS
TANK VOLUME
CONTAINMENT SIZE
L=
W::::
D=
CONVERSION FACTOR =
24-HR, 25-YR STORM EVENT =
CONTAINMENT VOLUME =
24-HR, 25-YR STORM VOLUME ==
REQUIRED VOLUME ==
7 - 10
Lubricant oil
550 GAL EA
16.92 FT
454 FT
2,33 FT
7.48 GALlCU FT
N/A. Tanks are located in shop.
1,339 GAL
None. GAL
550 GAL
TANK NO.
TANK CONTENTS
TANK VOLUME
CONTAINMENT SIZE
24-HR, 25-YR STORM EVENT ::::
11
Lubricant oil
360 GAL
None. Tank is located in building.
NJA
TANK NO.
TANK CONTENTS
TANK VOLUME
CONTAINMENT SIZE
24-HR, 25-YR STORM EVENT ::::
12
Antifreeze
628 GAL
None. Tank is located in building.
NJA
TANK NO.
TANK CONTENTS
TANK VOLUME
CONTAINMENT SIZE
L =
W::::
D=
CONVERSION FACTOR =
24-HR, 25-YR STORM EVENT ==
CONTAINMENT VOLUME ::::
24-HR, 25-YR STORM VOLUME =
REQUIRED VOLUME ::::
13
Diesel
10,000 GAL
30.92 FT
10.83 FT
4.46 FT
7.48 GALlCU FT
NJA. Tank is located in underground mine.
11,171 GAL
N/A GAL
10,000 GAL
2
NORTH INDIANAPOLIS spec PLAN
CONTAINMENT VOLUMECALCULA TIONS
TANK NO.
TANK CONTENTS
TANK VOLUME
CONTAINMENT SIZE
L=
w=
0=
CONVERSION FACTOR =
24-HR, 25-YR STORM EVENT =
CONTAINMENT VOLUME =
24-HR, 25-YR STORM VOLUME =
REQUIRED VOLUME =
14-15
Lubricant oil
250 GAL EA
8 FT
5.42 FT
1.96 FT
7.48 GAL/CU FT
N/A. Tank is located in underground mine.
636 GAL
N/A GAL
250 GAL
TANK NO.
TANK CONTENTS
TANK VOLUME
CONTAINMENT SIZE
L=
w=
D=
CONVERSION FACTOR =
24-HR, 25-YR STORM EVENT =
CONTAINMENT VOLUME =
24-HR, 25-YR STORM VOLUME =
REQUIRED VOLUME =
16&17
Gear oil & antifreeze
250 GAL EA
7.83 FT
6 FT
1 .83 FT
7.48 GAL/CU FT
N/A. Tank is located in underground mine.
643 GAL
N/A GAL
250 GAL
TANK NO.
TANK CONTENTS
TANK VOLUME
CONTAINMENT SIZE
L=
w=
D=
CONVERSION FACTOR =
24-HR, 25-YR STORM EVENT ==
CONTAINMENT VOLUME =
24-HR, 25- YR STORM VOLUME =
REQUIRED VOLUME =
18&19
Hydraulic oil
250 GAL EA
8 FT
5.42 FT
1.96 FT
7 A8 GALlCU FT
N/A. Tank is located in underground mine.
636 GAL
N/A GAL
250 GAL
3
NORTH INDIANAPOLIS SPCC PLAN
CONTAINMENT VOLUME CALCULATIONS
TANK NO.
TANK CONTENTS
TANK VOLUME
CONTAINMENT SIZE
L=
w=
D=
CONVERSION FACTOR =
24-HR, 25-YR STORM EVENT =
CONTAINMENT VOLUME =
24-HR, 25-YR STORM VOLUME =
REQUIRED VOLUME =
20
Used oil
275 GAL
7 FT
3.5 FT
1.67 FT
7.48 GALlCU FT
N/A. Tank is located in underground mine.
306 GAL
N/A GAL
275 GAL
TANK NO.
TANK CONTENTS
TANK VOLUME
CONTAINMENT SIZE
L=
w=
0=
CONVERSION FACTOR =
24-HR, 25-YR STORM EVENT =
CONTAINMENT VOLUME =
24-HR, 25-YR STORM VOLUME =
REQUIRED VOLUME =
21
Used oil
27 5 GAL
7 FT
3.5 FT
1.67 FT
7.48 GALlCU FT
N/A. Tank is located in underground mine.
306 GAL
N/A GAL
275 GAL
TANK NO.
TANK CONTENTS
TANK VOLUME
CONTAINMENT SIZE
L=
w=
D=
CONVERSION FACTOR =
24-HR, 25- YR STORM EVENT =
CONTAINMENT VOLUME =
24-HR, 25-YR STORM VOLUME =
REQUIRED VOLUME =
22
(Empty)
1,000 GAL
14.33 FT
5.5 FT
2 FT
7.48 GAUCU FT
N/A. Tank is located in underground mine.
1 ,179 GAL
N/A GAL
1,000 GAL
TANK NO.
TANK CONTENTS
TANK VOLUME
CONTAINMENT SIZE
23
Transformers
5,800 GAL (EST.)
None. Not practical.
4
NORTH INDIANAPOLIS SPCC PLAN
CONTAINMENT VOLUME CALCULATIONS
TANK NO.
TANK CONTENTS
TANK VOLUME
CONTAINMENT SIZE
24
Drums
2,200 GAL (EST.)
None. Flat topography.
TANK NO.
TAN K CONTENTS
TANK VOLUME
CONTAINMENT SIZE
25
Mobile equipment.
3,400 GAL (EST.)
None. Not practical.
TANK NO.
TANK CONTENTS
TANK VOLUME
CONTAINMENT SIZE
L=
w=
D::::
CONVERSION FACTOR =
24-HR, 25- YR STORM EVENT =
CONTAINMENT VOLUME ::::
24-HR, 25-YR STORM VOLUME =
REQUIRED VOLUME =
26
Lubricant oil
550 GAL
7.92 FT
4.83 FT
2.5 FT
7.48 GALlCU FT
N/A. Tank is located in underground mine.
715 GAL
NfA GAL
550 GAL
TANK NO.
TANK CONTENTS
TANK VOLUME
CONTAINMENT SIZE
24-HR, 25-YR STORM EVENT =
27
Crusher oil
180 GAL
None. Not practical with extensive design.
NfA
TANK NO.
TANK CONTENTS
TANK VOLUME
CONTAINMENT SIZE
24-HR, 25-YR STORM EVENT =
28
Crusher ail
180 GAL
None. Not practical with extensive design.
NfA
5
~.;'
....1
N
......
~
o
o
......
:Jil
o
~
......
II:)
o
o
....
......
::i::
VICINrrY MAP
MARTIN MARIETTA MA TERIALS, INC.
NORTH INDIANAPOLIS
4700 EAST 96th STREET
INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
I'n>J~cf Numbor.
86.32058.0013
Dtowing Fil.:
3205B~NORTHINDYJOO-VMAP
Dm. By.
SP
Ckd. By.
JL
App'd By.
FIg.,.:
1
'\
-/
""
G'
211 15..5...5 (a)(8)
u POSTCONSTRUCTION STORM ATER
P LlUTION PREVENTION PLAN
.J
(8) The postconstruction storm water pollution prevention plan. The plan must include the following
information:
A post construction storm water pollution prevention plan is not applicable to this
application since all proposed activities will be conducted underground and no
surface facilities or land disturbances whatsoever are being proposed for the
surface. A postconstruction storm water pollution prevention plan was created for
the surface limestone operation which is located beginning on Page 7-2 of this
notebook.
-.J
(A) A description of potential pollution sources from the proposed land use, that may
reasonably be expected to add a significant amount of pollutants to storm water discharges.
See Postconstruction Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan beginning on
Page 8-2.
(8) Location, dimensions, detailed specifications, and construction details of all
postconstruction storm water quality measures.
N/A. Following mining, all water wi.1I be contained within the pit for the
eventual creation of an artificial lake.
(C) A description of measures that will be installed to control pollutants in storm water
discharges that will occur after construction activities have been completed. Such practices
include infiltration of run-off, flow reduction by use of open vegetated swales and natural
depressions, buffer strip and riparian zone preservation, filter strip creation, minimization
of land disturbance and surface imperviousness, maximization of open space, and storm
water retention and detection ponds.
See Postconstruction Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan beginning on
Page 8-2.
(0) A sequence describing when each postconstruction storm water quality measure will
be installed.
See Postconstruction Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan beginning on
Page 8.2.
(E) Storm water quality measures that will remove or minimize pollutants from storm water
run-off.
See Postconstruction Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan beginning on
Page 8-2.
(F) Storm water quality measures that will be implemented to prevent or minimize adverse
impacts to stream and riparian habitat.
See postconstruction Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan beginning on
Page 8.2.
(G) A narrative description of the maintenance guidelines for all postconstruction storm
water quality measures to facilitate their proper long term function. This narrative
description shall be made available to future parties who will assume responsibility for the
operation and maintenance of the postconstruction storm water quality measures.
See Postconstruction Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan beginning on
Page 8-2.
-.J
8-1
..J
MUELLER PROPERTY SOUTH
SURFACE LIMESTONE OPERAT!ON
POSTCONSTRUCTION STORM WATER
POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
PREPARED FOR
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC.
-.J
PREPARED BY
SKELLY AND laY, INC.
ENGINEERS-CONSUL TANTS
SEPTEMBER 2005
~
8-2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
j
PAGE
DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL POLLUTANT SOURCES _ _ _ _ _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-4
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CONTROLS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ _ _ . . _ _ 8-4
~
..)
8-3
POSTCONSTRUCTION STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
I
..)
Following completion of mining activities, the site will be graded with slopes no steeper than
3 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) down to the top limestone bench (elevation 710' +/- MSL), with
drainage being directed to the pit for the eventual creation of an artificial lake. The site will be
revegetated in accordance with the Erosion and Sedimentation Control and Planting Plan - Post
Mining, provided in Mueller Property South Surface Limestone Operation Erosion and Sediment
Control Report, located in Section 6 of this Construction Plan. Temporary erosion and sediment
controls will remain in place until the contributing drainage areas are stabilized. The revegetation
will promote infiltration of runoff. A maintenance agreement for the relocated Blue Woods Creek
will be in place with the Hamilton County Surveyor.
DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL POLLUTANT SOURCES
There are no potential pollutant sources associated with the post-mining land use that may
reasonably be expected to add a significant amount of pollutants to storm water discharges.
~
~
8-4
r
....)
( ,
VI
~
a
"1:
C
c
if.
Soun,d Level Assessment
u
~
..J
)
There will be no noise impacts to surrounding properties because all mineral extraction,
equipment operations, and related activities proposed for the Mueller Property South will occur
underground.