HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence
A
June 3, 2008
EL
Mr. Tracy Spencer
Insight Engineering, Inc.
Suite C
9765 Randall Drive
Indianapolis, IN 46280
JAMES BRAINAlill, MAYOR
HE: Rangeline Road Circle K-Project Review #1
Dear Mr. Spencer:
The City received your construction plans on April 25, 2008. We offer the following comments:
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. These comments represent the Department of Engineering's frrst review of the Site
Preparation construction plans for this project.
2. We request that all responses to our future comments be provided in writing and be
accompanied by drawings reflecting the requested revisions. Failure to provide written
responses may result in the delay of the review process.
3. It is critical that this office be made aware of all modifications made on the plans being re-
submitted, particularly if any such changes are considered "new" or fall outside of our
previous reviews. Please notifY us of any changes and specifically state any changes,
including changes resulting from Plan Commission, BZA or other committee meetings.
4. We have engaged Crossroad Engineers, PC to review all drainage plans and drainage
calculations submitted to this office for review. As we discussed previously, submittal to
Crossroads is not required for this project.
5. Final drawings will not be approved for construction until:
a. All Engineering Department and Utility Department and Hamilton County Surveyor
issues have been resolved.
b. All bonds and performance guarantees are posted.
c. All Board of Public Works and Safety approvals and any other governing agency
approvals (if required) are obtained.
d. All off-site easements necessary to install utilities to serve the development are secured.
e. Any required fees are paid in full.
f. Required digital files have been submitted. .
6. The Department reserves the right to provide additional comments based upon subsequent
reviews as more detailed information is submitted.
7. An approved Storm Water Management Permit is required prior to commencing any earth
disturbing activity.
8. An approved right-of-way permit is required prior to commencing any work in the public
right-of-way.
9. If it will be necessary to relocate existing utilities or other infrastructure, the costs for such
relocations are to be borne solely by the developer. Any utility poles required to be relocated
within the right-of-way shall be relocated to within one foot of the proposed right-of-way.
10. Compliance with the Thoroughfare Plan includes construction of the improvements
prescribed by the Thoroughfare Plan as well as dedication of that additional right-of-way
outside of the existing right-of-way to meet the half right-of-way width prescribed by the
Thoroughfare Plan across the frontage controlled by the development (including sections
with no access). Typically, developers provide a commitment equal to the value to construct
DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING
ONE C1VIC SQUAHE, CAI\MEL, IN 46032 OFFfCE 317.571.2441 FAX 3175712439
EMAlL engineering@carmel.inguv
J
Mr. Tracy Spencer
JWle 3,2008
RE: Rangeline Road Circle K-Rev. #1
Page 2 of5
these improvements for deposit into the City's non-reverting thoroughfare fund. However,
compliance with the Thoroughfare Plan is not required due to the-nature of this project.
11. The Department requires that the construction drawings be developed in accordance with the
City of Carmel digital submission standards and that all required submittals for primary plat,
secondary plat, and construction drawings be made. The digital files must be submitted to
the Department of Engineering prior to the approval of the construction plans. Please contact
the City GIS Department for the requirements.
12. Jurisdictions:
a. The project site is located within current City of Carmel Corporate Limits.
b. Streets and Right of Way - City ofCarrnel (Rangeline Road)
c. Water - City of Carmel Utilities
d. Sanitary Sewers - City of Carmel Utilities
e' Storm Sewers/Drainage - City ofCarme1.
f. Legal Drains - Hamilton County Surveyor's Office.
13. Drawings submitted for approval:
a. The design engineer must certify all drawings submitted for final approval.
b. This office will require a minimum of 5 sets of drawings for approval after all issues have
been resolved. The drawings will be stamped as approved and signed by the City
Engineer and by Carmel Utilities. The Owner will receive 1 set which must be
maintainedort the construction site at all times. If additional approved sets are desired,
we will approve a maximwn of2 additional sets. However, the additional sets must be
submitted with the required minimum 5 sets.
14. Carmel Utilities wiD provide separate reviews of this projectfor water and sanitary sewer
issues. Please assure that copies of all drawings are sent to:
Paul Pace Paul Arnone
Carmel Utilities DistributionCarmel Utilities Collection
3450 West 1311t Street 901 North Rangeline Road
Westfield, IN 46074 Carmel, IN 46032
IS. Carmel Utilities does subscribe to "Holey Moley" who should be contacted directly for all
water main locations.
16. Digital versions of the following information are available upon request. Please share these
requirements with the developer and future contractors associated with the project:
a. Project Approval Checklist
b. Performance/Maintenance Guarantee Requirements
c. Performance/Maintenance Guarantee Release Procedure
d. Engineering Requirements for Building Permit Approval
e. Commercial pennitting Procedures
f. Utility Jurisdictions/Right of Way Permit
g. Water and Sanitary Sewer Fees
BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS AND SAFETY
17. I am enclosing a schedule for Board of Public Works and Safety meeting dates and agenda
deadlines for your use. Please use the Engineering Department deadlines for submissions to
the Board.
t 8. Any submission to the Board requires prior approval by tbe Carmel Clay Plan
Commission and/or tbe Board of Zoning Appeals (if applicable) and completion of
review by the Tecbnical Advisory Committee. All written requests to be placed on tbe
Board's agenda must include the appropriate Docket Number and the date (or dates) of
approval by tbe Plan Commission. and/or the Board of Zoning Appeals (if applicable).
19. Water and Sewer Availability (EDU) approval from the Board is based upon the usage of the
proposed buildmgs within the development. Reference item #34 below for a more detailed
explanation. If an irrigation system is planned for this development, approval for additional
Water Availability (and Sanitary Sewer if applicable) must be obtained from the Board.
~
Mr. Tracy Spencer
JWle 3, 2008
RE: Rangeline Road Circle K-Rev. #1
Page 3 of5
20. Commercial Curb Cut Approval - Reconstruction of the existing drives requires Board
approval even if replaced in kind.
21. Temporary Construction Entrance - The use of one of the existing entrances for construction
traffic requires approval from the Board.
22. The installation of any permanent:, privately owned and/or maintained improvement (signs,
decorative street signs, walls, streetlights, etc.) within dedicated right of way or dedicated
easements requires the execution of a Consent to Encroach Agreement between the Owner
and the City of Cannel. Such agreements are executed by the Board of Public Works and
Safety. The City Engineer may approve irrigation system agreements.
23. Secondary Plat approval if applicable. All performance guarantees must be posted prior to
submission ofsecondary plats for Board of Public Works and Safety approval.
24. Dedication of Right of way if applicable.
25. It appears that there may be open pavement cuts of City Center Drive for the Water Main
relocation. If so, these cuts would require Board approval. These cuts sball be indicated on
the demolition plan for removal and on the site (or utility) plan for restoration. Please
indicate sawcut pavement removal. The street cut shall be restored in accordance with the
City's standard Street Cut Patch detail. This detail must be added to the plans.
BONDING REQUIREMENTS
26. Upon initial review, it appears Performance Guarantees shall be provided for the followmg:
a. Erosion and Sediment Control and Storm Water Quality. Please contact Amanda Foley,
Engineering Department Stonnwater Administrator, for details regarding engineer's
estimates/performance guarantee requirements for these items.
b. Any work in the right-of-way (drive reconstruction or re-paving, sidewalk, streetscape,
etc.).
Please contact Cannel Utilities to determine if Performance Guarantees for Water Mains and
Sanitary Sewers will be required for this project.
27. The amount of the Performance Guarantee is based upon a certified Engineer's Estimate for
100% of the cost ofIabor and materials to construct the individual improvements, to be
provided by the design engineer. Please provide detailed Engineer's Estimates for each
improvement including quantities, Wlit costs, pipe sizes and materials, etc.
28. Upon completion and release of individual Performance Guarantees, a three-year
Maintenance Guarantee will be required. The Maintenance Guarantee amount is based upon
l5% of the Performance amount for Streets and Curbs and 10% of the Performance amoWlt
for all other improvements.
29. Performance Guarantees may be Performance or Subdivision Bonds or Irrevocable Letters of
Credit.
30. Please reference the available enclosures for more detailed explanation of our procedures.
RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT AND BONDING
31. Any work in the dedicated right of way of Rangeline Road will require an approved Right of
Way Permit and a License & Permit Bond.
32. The bond amount is determined by the number of instances of work in the right of way at
$2,000.00 per instance. However, if the work is included in the scope of work ofa required
and posted Performance Guarantee, the Performance Guarantee may be used to satisfy the
bond requirements of the Right of Way Permit.
33. Please contact our Right of Way Manager, Fred Glaser, to arrange right of way permitting
and bonding.
AVAILABILITY AND CONNECTION FEES
34. New water related fees have been authorized effective July 2,2007. The revisions are:
a. Tap Inspection Fee-An $86.00/].0 EDU tap inspection fee shall be charged for each new
user within Cannel's water system. The current Water Connection Fee is
~
Mr. Tracy Spencer
June 3, 2008
RE: Rangeline Road Circle K-Rev. #1
Page 4of5
$1,31O.00IEDU. This has not been revised. Thus, $1,310.00 Water COlU1ection Fee/l.O
EDU plus Water Inspection Fee of $86.00/1.0 EDU = $1,396.0011.0 EDU Total.
b. Development Application Review Fee- This fee will be assessed at the time the Water
Availability Fee is paid. The review fee is $150.00 for single commercial, business and
residential customers requiring a water connection and $300.00 for developments with
more than one customer requiring a water connection. The latter fee of $300.00 would be
applicable to this project.
c. Water and Sanitary Sewer Availability (acreage) Fees 1 Connection Fees
Please contact Carmel Utilities regarding these fees.
35. If an irrigation system is planned for this development, additional Water Availability Fees
and Water Connection Fees will be assessed based upon the size and usage of the system and
upon the recommendations of the Director of Carmel Utilities.
SITE PREPARATION CONSTRUCTION PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
36. General Comments
a. The City has adopted a new curbing policy. All new curbing installed by this project
shaH conform to this policy. Please revise any notes, specifications, and details to
accommodate this policy. The language of this policy must be added to a specification
sheet on the final construction plans.
37. Stonn Water Management
a. Due to the nature of this project and the fact that there is no increase to the amount of
existing impervious area, the Department is not requesting the installation of stann water
management facilities.
b. The total disturbed area is indicated to be 0.27-acres and includes aspects of Land
Altering activity as defined in Section 10] .03 of the Stonn Water Technical Standards
that the Department was not aware were being proposed during previous discussions.
This area is above the 0.25-acre threshold above which the City's standards become
applicable (not the O.S-acres indicated on the plan sheet). Due to this fact, a construction
erosion and sediment control plan must be developed for this project and a storm water
quality system must be installed. Given the limited ability to treat the stormwater, the
Department would be willing to support a variance from the City's requirement for two
BMP's in series if one measure was proposed. Options for this measure include the
installation ofa hydrodynamic separator or replacement of the existing on-site inlets with
catch basins and hoods.
38. On the cover sheet, please remove the contact information for the Clay Township Regional
Waste District.
39. On the cover sheet, please correct the name ofthe Hamilton County Surveyor.
40. On the cover sheet, please replace the contact information for the Hamilton County Highway
Department with the contact information for the City of Carmel, Department of Engineering.
41. On the cover sheet, please remove the note referencing the Town of Fishers Construction
Specifications and Standard Details.
42. Sheet C801 - Please replace the CONCRETE STRAIGHT CURB detail with the City of
Carmel standard detail available on the City's website.
43. Sheet C801, CURB JOINT DETAIL - Please indicate the maximum spacing between
transverse expansion joints to be 50 feet instead of ]00 feet. Also indicate that the maximum
spacing of transverse contraction joints is 10 feet on tangents and 5 feet on radii.
44. Please remove all of the lighting, landscaping, and architectural sbeets from the sets of
drawings to be approved by the Department of Engineering. Also remove the titles of these
sheets from the Drawing Index on the cover sheet.
45. Please confrrm that it was not possible to reduce the width and limit the access to "right-out
only" at the northernmost Rangeline Road curb cut as previously discussed.
46. Please label all existing right-of-way lines as well as the halfwidths.
Mr. Tracy Spencer
June 3, 2008
RE: Rangeline Road Circle K-Rev. #1
Page 5 of5
47. Please provide a maintenance of traffic plan for the drive reconstructions. Such plans shall
conform to the INDOT Work Zone Safety Manual.
48. Please confirm if any existing streetscape is being affected by this project.
49. Please verify that the portions of the entrances within the right-of-way shall be 7-inch
concrete per the detail on Sheet C80 1.
50. Please verify if there are any proposed modifications to the existing ADA ramps in the right-
of-way included in this project.
51. The portions of any utility installations or relocations within the right-of-way shall be
backfilled in accordance with this Departments standard and shall satisfY the minimum cover
requirements. These notes need to be added to the plans. Please contact this office to obtain
the standard notesllanguage.
52. Please add a note to each sheet that no earth disturbing activity may take place without an
approved stann water management permit.
53. Please add a note to the drawings as follows: "All paving within the existing and proposed
City right-of-way shall confonn to the requirements of the Department of Engineering. The
Contractor shall contact the Department of Engineering to schedule a pre-construction
meeting to review the Department's construction requirements, staff notification
requirements, required inspections for certain stages of the work and to review the authority
of the Department as it relates to work within the existing and proposed City right-of-way."
Uyou have questions, please contact me at 571-2441.
cc: Angelina Conn, Department of Community Services
John Duffy, Carmel Utilities
Paul Pace, Carmel Utilities Distribution
Paul Arnone, Carmel Utilities Collection
Greg Hayes, Hamilton County Surveyor's Office
Greg IIko, Crossroad Engineers, PC
Les Ollis, Director of Redevelopment
Department ReviewlFile Copy
\\Apps2\user data\englshared\DHill\PROJREV08\CIRCLEK-RANGELINEROAD.doc
Page 1 of3
Conn, Angelina V
From: Donald Fisher [dfisher@insightengineering.com]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 11 :20 AM
To: Holmes, Christine B
Cc: Tracy Spencer; Conn, Angelina V
Su-bject: HE: Circle K, Carmel Drive and Rangeline Rd, Carmel, IN (IEI#9760CK)
Christine,
We want to continue, What do you need from us?
Thanks
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: Holmes, Christine B [mailto:cholmes@carmel.in.gov]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 10:34 AM
To: Donald Fisher
Cc: Conn, Angelina V
Subject: RE: Circle K, Carmel Drive and Rangeline Rd, Carmel, IN (IEI#9760CK)
Don,
We're working on putting together the agenda for the upcoming BZA hearing, and Special Studies
committee is tomorrow night. Would you like to continue the petition, or go forward and get same more
feedback from the Committee?
Please let us know,
Thanks,
Christine
Christine Barton-Holmes, LEED AP
Planning Administrator
Department of Community Services
City af Carmel
One Civic Square
Carmel, Indiana 46032
317.571.2424
317.571.2426 fax
~ Pkas" consi,kr Hl" environment bcibre priming
From: Donald Fisher [mailto:dfisher@insightengineering.com]
Sent: Friday, May 3D, 2008 11:21 AM
To: Holmes, Christine B; Conn, Angelina V
Cc: Tracy Spencer; Hancock, Ramona B
Subject: RE: Circle K, Carmel Drive and Rangeline Rd, Carmel, IN (IEI#9760CK)
Christine,
I don't believe that I have received these minutes yet. Please forward them to me,
Thanks,
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: Holmes, Christine B [mailto:cholmes@carmel.in.gov]
Sent: Friday, May 09, :2008 11:17 AM
To: Donald Fisher; Conn, Angelina V
Cc: Tracy Spencer; Hancock, Ramona B
Subject: RE: Circle K, Carmel Drive and Rangeline Rd, Carmel, IN (IEI#9760CK)
6/2/2008
Page 1 of 2
Conn, Angelina V
From: Ron & Carol Schleif [schleif@indy.rr.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 11 :53 AM
To: John Molitor
Cc: Hollibaugh, Mike P; Carter, Roriald E; Blanchard, Jim E; Conn, Angelina V; Holmes, Christine B; Susan
Westermeier; Rick Ripma; Dan Dutcher; Jay Dorman; Forwarding Email Heber, Kevin; Hancock, Ramona
B; Madeleine Torres; Steven Stromquis; 'Wayne Haney'
Subject: Shell on Rangeline
John,
Can we bring this to the full plan commission if Special Studies would like it to go there? II doesn't sound like the
petitioner has any intention of following the overlay.
Is there a threshold at which ADLS amend petitioners must meet the Overlay? On a very quick pass through the overlay,
it looks to me that all ADLS petitions need to come to full plan commission for a public hearing... Is that right???
Shell - History:
III A few months ago the guidelines committee meeting took a peak at this for Mike, and we agreed that moving the
building to the street was the best choice.
o One point of discussion at the time of renewing the RR-Carmel Dr overlay was that we needed the overlay to be
renewed for another year for this particular project.
Now:
III Most of this site is being demolished:
III All the pavement, landscaping & much of the equipment will be demolished.
III All but2 signs, lighting fixtures and canopy columns wili be bull-dosed.
G Most of the building will be demolished:
ill 60% of the existing building exterior walls will be demolished.
III All the interior of the existing building will be torn out.
III So many structural walls are to be removed that there is no way that the existing roof could stay up.
Concern:
This is a MAJOR renovation. Why are they not required to meet the overlay? The Dept Report is vague.
If they are allowed to get a variance here, will Pizza Hut and others be able to do the same?
Future Idea:
There are many ways to determine when a building can be grandfathered based on the amount or cost of a
renovations including:
· % square footage increases (DP has this for this overlay, but not ADLS)
· % of building value compared with cost of the addition/renovation
· % of floor area being remodeled in an existing building
· size of construction cost.
If the overlay is to be renewed again, or made permanent, we should probably discuss thresholds like these.
Thanks for all your help!!!
Carol
1-~
-----Original Message-----
From: Holmes, Christine B [mailto:cholmes@carmel.in.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 12:53 PM
To: Conn, Angelina V; Angie Molt; Boone, Rachel M.; Brewer, Scott I; Bruce Smith; Carolyn Schleif; Coy, Sue E;
5/2/20~8Cm- -~.(_-,,<-.5L-/
Page 20f2
Donahue-Wold, Alexia K; Dorman, Jay; Duncan, Gary R; Ellison, Christopher M; Hancock, Ramona S; Heck, Nancy
S; Hollibaugh, Mike P; Jeffrey Cohen; John Molitor; Keeling, Adrienne M; Kevin Heber; Forwarding E-mail,
Dierckman, Leo; Linda Burdett - Ham Co PC; Littlejohn, David W; Lyndsay Kinsey; Madeleine Torres; Marilyn
Anderson; Mark Zukerman; Molitor, John R; Randy Marra; webteam@heckweb,net; Rick Osborn; Rick Ripma; Ron
Houck; Steve Stromquist; Stewart, Lisa M; Susan Westermeier; Tingley, Connie S; Haneywb@aol.com; Judy
Hagan; bill.ruthhart@indystar.com; StarNorth@indystar.com; FrancescaJarosz@indystar.com;Dutcher, Dan;
Rider, Kevin D; Worthley, Matthew D
Cc: Don Fisher; Tracy Spencer; Jim Shinaver; charlie@nf-Iaw.com; Wendling, Bill
Subject: RE: May 8 Plan Commission committee agendas
Good afternoon, everyone,
Please note the additional item on the Special Studies committee agenda. If you have any questions, please let
me know.
Regards,
Christine Barton-Holmes
Planning Administrator
Department of Community Services
City of Carmel
One Civic Square
Carmel, Indiana 46032
317.571.2424
317.571.2426 fax
'" ,. ",I I " "t"" "
~ [J,Leas(' CUHSlv.tT Lli" cn~':LrOl1111t:iU Dc: OIe pl'1llung
From: Conn, Angelina V
Sent: Friday, April 25,2008 12:56 PM
To: 'Angie Molt'; Boone, Rachel M.; Brewer, Scott I; 'Bruce Smith'; 'Carolyn Schleif; Coy, Sue E; Donahue-Wold,
Alexia K; Dorman, Jay; Duncan, Gary R; Ellison, Christopher M; Hancock, Ramona B; Heck, Nancy 5; Hollibaugh,
Mike P; Holmes, Christine B; 'Jeffrey Cohen'; 'John Molitor'; Keeling, Adrienne M; 'Kevin Heber'; Forwarding E-
mail, Dierckman, Leo; 'Linda Burdett - Ham Co PC'; Littlejohn, David W; 'Lyndsay Kinsey'; 'Madeleine Torres';
'Marilyn Anderson'; 'Mark Zukerman'; Molitor, John R; 'Randy Marra'; 'Richard Heck (webteam@heckweb.net)';
'Rick Osborn'; 'Rick Ripma'; 'Ron Houck'; 'Steve Stromquist'; Stewart, Lisa M; 'Susan Westermeier'; l1ngley,
Connie S; 'Wayne Haney (Haneywh@aol.com)'; 'Judy Hagan'; 'bill.ruthhart@indystar.com';
'StarNorth@indystar.com'; 'FrancescaJarosz@indystar.com'; 'Dutcher, Dan'; Rider, Kevin D; Worthley, Matthew D
Cc: 'Don Fisher'; 'Tracy Spencer'; 'Jim Shinaver'; 'Charles D. Frankenberger (charlie@nf-Iaw.com)'; 'Wendling, Bill'
Subject: May 8 Plan Commission committee agendas
Good afternoon, everyone: Attached are the agendas for the THURSDAY, May 8, Plan Commission Special
Studies and Subdivision committee meetings. (The meeting is on Thursday, since Tuesday is Primary Election
Day.)
This month, the Special Studies committee meeting will be held in the Planning/Zoning confer.ence room, Srd Floor
of City Hall.
Let me know if you have any questions,
Angie Conn, Planning Administrator
Dept. of Community Services - Planning & Zoning
1 Civic Square, 3rd Floor
City of Carmel, IN 46032
p.317-571-2417 f. 317-571-2426
aconn@carmel.in.gov
5/2/2008
!.
~,'
.~.
. Insight
Eng:i ne~ri ng,
. "
ln~c.
April 28, .2Q08 .
. t, 9765 Randall Drive
Suite C . '.
,~ _~. ,I~diarl~pol!s, IN46280
,.~,~ .~~ ,'.
1 I\.
.Angie'(}onn . '
'De{fl~inei1t of-Community serv,ices - Planning & Zoning
Ci(y of Carmel
. .. .' 'rd.
1 .olvlq Square;~' FIOQr
Cari.l1~t IN: 4603'2
(317) 1348-904'6.. ' .
. (~1~): 848-908:0)fax ' '!
. ;~w:insightengirl'eeriilg.com
Re:', Circle K,Sl1ell O;mverueQ(3e C~n.tei'
1230S.,Rang~liQe'R0ad :
Dear M'g'. Conn:
. The'followrng;ate,the respOIlses to the plal11iing staff comments r:ece;ived byema,il cla.ted
April 21 st;wiJh a follQw up OIl Aprit~2,20Q8,. C.opi,e.sQft~e, c6Ii1ln~l).t letters. are
. . att<l.cht:;~L
April 121, Comments:
. I. Please proyidecolor building and canopy elevations and/or rel1dedng~;
Golor.elevationsofboth'the buildIngs and canoPY are IIl,ch,l(l.e~Un thil'
submi~talp3,ckag~.. .
. - ~- . -.,',
"
. .
.j r
2. 'Wjll the'canQPY pillars Ch.angein !TI<J,t~Ji'al/'tolof <is p'!rLof th}& r.enovatiori?
T.h~ canopy coiumn'scur.rently,-havea.Cover oIi"~r,ap over them that. was
patt;ofShell's "Silv.erado Image1'~We p,J;oppse:fo..reOO!.lVe th~c.~rreilt
w,r~psaIidteptace tJ1~m .with. i)ew wr~ps ~hatma(~h the,colurrmsOf the
~~i1~ihg.' . . . .
',:;1. The land,$cape plal) will be'reYlew~&approvedby the City:Forester, $.cott
BreWeL' " . .
Our landsca.pe. arc~itect metwitb Mr. Brewer to dis,c;llSS the,~iteand. gait) -
informa.fion .on 'bispre(~rences fQr'tl1g1aildscapihg.
4. Please:pro~iOe'cblor ttash'eIielosureelevations.' TheC91or/mat,erials sho,lHdbe
.eornplementary"to th6blJilding.
/
'1'1i~'colQr ~levati()n.$' of ~he/tt~~1J end9S~t:e ar~ incJqde(l'i.n this. package.
T~e trashert~losut,e wi" utilize brick tha~matche~ the.proposed building
fac.ade. ., .
"5. Pble:ligpts shq.u.1d p~iflak1ehses,.w.:itb' 90-pegt~e' 9\lr'offs: please sh"ow/.provide'
t1]# d~t~iL. . .
AS'tIlisproject is a;r:emodel and ad4itioll; the plans show tfieexisting area
IightS'to rem~in. We. propose to paintthelll a'b:ronie color that i~'sjmifar
to ofber newer'(l\ciljtle~ il! tlie ar~a~ We"tR,!ld. t.hes~ppl!et. ohtlis braQd,of.
lights pfovHle. a.. phQfpmet.riC plan,~ssuming:fio' ~liieiding'()f the, existing
lights but we, do not Khowif the' existi'llg lights have. 90 deg cut.offs;
,. .
,6: AJeany cbllflge~ :;beiii&TniOldetQ.tQe ~'oqh(f &'ign1 ,
thee,xisHng\lgr~)1~nd signs~are.6n: a'Jjr:ick base. We:, plan fOr ,t~e btJck .
'ben~hesto,match th.ese bases and;not , block the signage. Given t,hisplan,
. w.e do not'antiCipat~ IIJodit:yin~Jhe;.~J(istii1g grou,ri(tsi'~ns..,' . .
7, ShQwllabel the toad rights of way (;3.A5'-haiCper the 2Q yr'thQroughiar~ pl~m).
" building setb~ck fines,; and. b,ufferyard, setp,acks .0Ilt,h!? site~lan; as Welt"\l$. ;3.1))'
e~sem~nts.. ' , . .' . , .
Th'e,siteplan .(C201) hasbeeit rev,ised' to show alhhe/existing I'~ghts ()f,
'way ,and easements ofr,ecor,d,as ~etermined by a s~rvey:".prepare,d bY"
'IIlsAght~ngj,lJee!in~..
K' Show/lab~r the Iength..and wictth. oft):1e buU4ing. .
Th~ ~it~pian>(C701) has.he.en'feXlsed t9 s!i9\f the cOJllplet~d:building
general dimensions. Since: tlrebuilding.has:'various :pl~nes within th~,
facad~s"Please refer'to th~',architectura1 f10Q[ plan fordetaIIe,d
:<lirrte.nsions. '
9. Show/label the mechanical equipment :and how'ifwill be ,screenedJroin ",ieM"',
T~eroof,t!JP;:mechanic~~leqlJiprpent will ~e:cs.cr~~~ed (rQni View'Iil vai'i64~
w~ys. The buildIllg will be,significantly laller than tbetexisting building;.
. >it~iII11'~ve a parap,et wali on, tbe'n.)Ul"el~va.tions thafwIU )'ary in heigh~
froft) about thr~e feet to fo.p.r'f~et' t~n above~the rOQf. The pediments 'for
the efltrallcedoors .extend'six feet above the;'parapet w~I1sand we. propose
,to.insJ!lU scr~e~ wall~ amltnd the mech,c:liIiC:3.J eqlljpmei1t., :rh~ d~t.ails of '
. sC'reeli'wins'ai'.elndu"dE~d,ln .thiS.packag~.. ,. ,
. rD. .prea~e'.PIovide digital cppi~sotth<? Efans<Uld' ~levatiOl1~ viaPDF via em~ilor
~Ji!iri1~fi CD. , '
" This I?~~kage;.includes a GD' of~~igital YDF topic'S ofthe attadiments.
.LI. Pi:ovlde tIle ,lot coverag~percentage,' .Th~ building m:ufpaveirIerit shQuJd :be
,fjgured m"
The existing and proposed site plans: haye lo.t'coverage:of iniperviQQs.
sutface of74 percellt.
12.'Lig;hfingfoot-{)aridIe.mea.suremeIits'shan not be more thaLQ.5 at the property
lines.
T~e.comment was withdrawn in tlw 4/22/08follQwupcomment. emait .
""IS.. Nbte~ Additional cohllhe~tS1-fmlybe:made at the cQintnittee me'etiIig by staff.
We ackriowledge that staff at the;committee,m'eeting::may provide further" .
comments.
The reSp9I1sM to:the April 2ZnQ fbHow up.c6'mment~ frompfailIlingstaff are
prov-ided:belo.w. .
1. 'The.nghtlhgfoot-caQql~"limhs dQ Jlot apply. to tl}is's'ite,.since itcJoes 1),91 abut
residential useS'.
We. acknowledge that the' light levels atthe property lines are not
requ'ii:ed sjnc~; t~e.site do~~ ilOti.abu.t residen~talproperties. .
.-" . '.
2. :Pleaseshow/laheLany outdoors saleso[Qutdoor dIsplays for this site. '.
Ctrcl~,K trpicany,h~$ ane~t~rior.tc~ freezetand.~easo~al merc.h~~d:i"se
sucl;1'as ra.diat~t'im.tifr~eze 'or windshielg w~hii1gso1llti(jn" for the' .
convenience,of .the c~stomer~:aS outdoor, displays..OutilQor. displays shall
~oi1formto.sections 25.21,25'.22 & 25~23()f the Carn:iel Zonil;Ig Qr<li~ance~
. . ,.'
3-. Will the>awniI1gs a"ctually beyeUo\v, in color" as. sho\Vllonthe elevations?
'.l'he a:whin~~ o.nJhe. bu.ilding-w.iII be red .and white as sho~n on tbe',
,elevations. The flIel C~llOpy fasci:i'wiUbe yellow"ted, ::}ndwJtite~.
RespectfuUy,
.~~10~
pomHd W. Fisher, P..R
~sightEiigif\eerin~, Inc., .
i.
. .
Conn. Angelina V
From:
Sent:
To:
David Lucas [del@co.hamilton.in.us]
Wednesday, April 23, 2008 10:35 AM
ron.morris@aes.com; Conn, Angelina V; Foley, Amanda J; Ellison, Christopher M; Holmes,
Christine B; Huffman, David; Littlejohn, David W; Duncan, Gary R; Duffy, John M; Fogarty,
Michael D; Redden, Nick; Brewer, Scott I; Krueskamp, Theresa A; Akers, William P; Hohlt,
William G; mwestermeier@carmel.in.us; Rfarrand@ccs.k12.in.us; Brooke Gajownik; Greg
Hayes; Jason LeMaster; gilko@crossroadengineers.com; ryan.harman@ctrwd.org;
Gary.McNamee@duke-energy.com; shirley.hunter@duke-energy.com; Tracy Spencer;
jason .kirkman@mybrighthouse.com; david.malone@SUG.com; dale.m.sparks@usps.gov;
cshu pperd@vectren.com; jen nifer. martlett@veoliawaterna.com
Kevin Merritt; G. Bradley Myrick; Donald W. Fisher PE; Herschel W. Roll
Re: Circle K, 1230 S. Rangeline Road, Carmel, IN - 08040008ADLS Amend (lEI 9760ck)-
Architectural Pa
Cc:
Subject:
Tracy,
Highway has no issues, as it is outside of our jurisdiction.
sincerely,
David E. Lucas
HCHD Staff Engineer/Road
1700 South lOth Street
Noblesville, IN 46060
(317) 770-4474 - Direct Line
(317) 773-7770 - Office
( 3 1 7 ) 7 7 6 - 9814 - Fax
e-mail: del@co.hamilton.in.us
website: www.co.hamilton.in.us
>>> "Tracy Spencer" <tspencer@insightengineering.com> 4/21/2008 4:20 PM
>>> >>>
To all TAC Members,
Please find attached Architectural plans for the Circle K at 1230 S.
Rangeline Road that have been submitted to the City for ADLS Amend.
Although the above will not be on a TAC agenda, it was suggested that this email be sent
to you and comments are welcomed. If you need paper copies of the attached, please email
me back and I will see to it that said plans are submitted to you upon request.
Please call with any questions.
Tracy Spencer
Insight Engineering, Inc.
Conn, Angelina V
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Greg Ilko [gilko@crossroadengineers.com]
Wednesday, April 23, 2008 10:42 AM
'Greg Hayes'; 'Tracy Spencer'
Conn, Angelina V; Holmes, Christine B; Duncan, Gary R; 'Kevin Merritt'; '''David Lucas'''; 'G.
Bradley Myrick'; 'Donald W. Fisher PE'; 'Herschel W. Roll'
RE: Circle K, 1230 S. Rangeline Road, Carmel, IN - 08040008ADLS Amend (lEI 9760ck)-Site
Package par
Subject:
I will not require any additional information either.
Thanks,
Gregory J. llko
CrossRoad Engineers, PC
3417 Sherman Drive
Beech Grove, IN 46107
office: 317.780.1555 ext. 112
fax: 317.780.6525
web: www.crossroadengineers.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Hayes [mailto:grh@co.hamilton.in.us]
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 10:29 AM
To: Tracy Spencer
Cc: aconn@carmel.in.gov; Christine Barton-Holmes; gduncan@carmel.in.gov; Kevin MerriLt;
David Lucas; gilko@crossroadengineers.com; G. Bradley Myrick; Donald W. Fisher PE;
Herschel W. Roll
Subject: Re: Circle K, 1230 S. Rangeline Road, Carmel, IN - 08040008ADLS Amend (lEI
9760ck)-Site Package par
Tracy
The Hamilton County Surveyor's Office has no lssues with this project. If you have any
questions, please let me know.
Greg Hoyes
HeSO Plan Reviewer
>>> "Tracy Spencer" <tspencer@insightengineering.com> 4:26 PM Monday,
>>> April
21, 2008 >>>
To all TAC Members,
Please find attached Site plans (Part 2) for the Circle K at 1230 S.
Rangeline Road that have been submiLted to the City for ADLS. Amend.
Although the above will not be on a TACagenda, iL was suggested LhaL this email be sent
to you and comments are welcomed. If you need paper copies of the attached, please email
me back and I will see to it thaL said plans are submitted to you upon request.
Please calI with any questions.
Tracy Spencer
Insight Engineering, Inc.
1
Conn, Angelina V
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Greg Hoyes [grh@co.hamilton.in.us]
Wednesday, April 23, 2008 10:29 AM
Tracy Spencer
Conn, Angelina V; Holmes, Christine B; Duncan, Gary R; Kevin Merritt; David Lucas;
gilko@crossroadengineers.com; G. Bradley Myrick; Donald W. Fisher PE; Herschel W. Roll
Re: Circle K, 1230 S. Rangeline Road, Carmel, IN - 08040008ADLS Amend (lEI 9760ck)-Site
Package par
Subject:
Tracy
The Hamilton County Surveyor's Office has no issues with this project. If you have any
questions, please let me know.
Greg Hayes
HCSO Plan Reviewer
>>> "Tracy Spencer" <tspencer@insightengineering.com> 4:26 PM Monday,
>>> April 21, 200B >>>
To all TAC Members,
Please find attached Site plans (Part 2) for the Circle K at 1230 S.
Rangeline Road that have been submitted to the City for ADLS Amend.
Although the above will not be on a TAC agenda, it was suggested that this email be sent
to you and comments are welcomed. If you need paper copies of the attached, please email
me back and I will see to it that said plans are submitted to you upon request.
Please call with any questions.
Tracy Spencer
Insight Engineering, Inc.
1
Conn. Angelina V
From:
Sent:
To:
Greg lIke [gilko@crossroadengineers.com]
Monday, April 21, 2008 4:43 PM
'Tracy Spencer'; Conn, Angelina V; Holmes, Christine B; Akers, William P; Brewer, Scott I;
Fogarty, Michael D; Ellison, Christopher M; Duncan, Gary R; Redden, Nick; Hohlt, William G;
Duffy, John M; Littlejohn, David W; Krueskamp, Theresa A; del@co.hamilton.in.us;
jtl@co.hamilton.in.us; bmg@cohamilton.in.us; shirley.hu nter@duke-energy.com;
Rfarrand@ccs.k12.in.us; david.malone@SUG.com; mwestermeier@carmel.in.us;
G RH@co.hamilton.in.us; jason. kirkman@mybrighthouse.com;
jennifer.m artlett@veoliawaterna.com; ryan .harman@ctrwd.org; cshu pperd@vectren.com;
Gary.McNamee@duke-energy.com; Huffman, David; Foley, Amanda J;
dale. m .sparks@usps.gov; ran .morris@aes.com
'Kevin Merritt'; 'Herschel W. Roll'; 'G. Bradley Myrick'; 'Donald W. Fisher PE'
RE: Circle K, 1230 S. Rangeline Road, Carmel, IN - 08040008 ADLS Amend (lEI 9760ck)-
Architectural Package
Cc:
Subject:
No comments with regards to drainage at this time. At such time as final construction
documents and drainage calculations are prepared, I will require one full size hard copy
of each.
Thanks,
Gregory J. lIko
CrossRoad Engineers, PC
3417 Sherman Drive
Beech Grove, IN 46107
office: 317.780.1555 ext. 112
fax: 317.780.6525
web: www.crossroadengineers.com
~----Original M~ssage-----
From: Tracy Spencer [mailto:tspencer@insightengineering.com]
Sent: Monday, April 21,20084,:21 PM
To: aconn@carmel.in.gov; Christine Barton-Holmes; Wakers@carmel.in.gov;
Sbrewer@carmel.in.gov; Mfogarty@carmel.in.gov; cellison@carmel.in.gov;
gduncan@carmel.in.gov; nredden@carmel.in.gov; whohlt@carmel.in.govi JDuffy@carmel.in.govi
dlittlejohn@carmel.in.gov; Tkrueskamp@carmel.in.gov; del@co.hamilton.in.usi
jtl@co.hamilton.in.us; bmg@co.hamilton.in.us; shirley.hunter@duke-energy.comi
Rfarrand@ccs.k12.in.us; david.malone@SUG.com; mwestermeier@carmel.in.us;
GRH@co.hamilton.in.us; jason.kirkman@mybrighthouse.com;
jennifer.martlett@veoliawaterna.com;
ryan.harman@ctrwd.org; cshupperd@vectren.com; Gary.McNamee@duke-energy.com;
dhuffman@carmel.in.govi afoley@carme1.in.gov; gilko@crossroadengineers.com;
dale.m.sparks@usps.gov; ron.morris@aes.com
Cc: Kevin Merritti Herschel W. Roll; G. Bradley Myrick; Donald W. Fisher PE
Subject: Circle K, 1230 S. Rangeline Road, Carmel, IN - 08040008 ADLS Amend (lEI 9760ck)-
Architectural package
To all TAC Members,
please find attached Architectural plans for the Circle K at 1230 S.
Rangeline Road that have been submitted to the City for ADLS Amend.
Although the above will not be on a TAC agenda, it was suggested that this email be sent
to you and comments are welcomed. If you need paper copies of the attached, please email
me back and I will see to it that said plans are submitted to you upon request.
Please call with any questions.
Tracy Spencer
Insight Engineering, Inc.
1
Conn. Angelina V
From:
Sent:
To:
Tracy Spencer [tspencer@insightengineering.com]
Monday, April 21,20084:27 PM
Conn, Angelina V; Holmes, Christine B; Akers, William P; Brewer, Scott I; Fogarty, Michael D;
Ellison, Christopher M; Duncan, Gary R; Redden, Nick; Hohlt, William G; Duffy, John M;
Littlejohn, David W; Krueskamp, Theresa A; del@co.hamilton.in.us; jtl@co.hamilton,in.us;
bmg@co.hamilton.in.us; shirley.hunter@duke-energy.com; Rfarrand@ccs.k12.in,us;
david, malone@SUG.com; mwestermeier@carmel.in.us; G RH@co.hamilton.in.us;
j ason. k irkman@mybrighthouse.com; jenn ifer .martlett@veoliawaterna.com;
ryan. harman@ctrwd.org; cshupperd@vedren.com; Gary.McNamee@duke-energy.com;
Huffman, David; Foley, Amanda J; gilko@crossroadengineers.com; dale.m.sparks@usps.gov;
ran .morris@aes.com
Kevin Merritt; Herschel W. Roll; Donald W. Fisher PE; G. Bradley Myrick
Circle K, 1230 S. Rangeline Road, Carmel, IN - 08040008 ADLS Amend (lEI 9760ck)-Site
Package part 2
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
9760CK-C801.pdf; 9760CK-C802.pdf; 9760CK-C901.pdf; 9760CK-CS.pdf
[~
~
~
~
9760CK-C801.pdf 9760CK-C802.pdf 9760CK-C9D1.pclf 9760CK-CS.pdf (1
(971 KB) (869 KB) (1 MB) MB)
To all TAC Members,
Please find attached Site plans (Part 2) for the Circle K at 1230 S.
Rangeline Road that have been submitted to the City for ADLS Amend.
Although the above will not be on a TAC agenda, it was suggested that this email be sent
to you and comments are welcomed. If you need paper copies of the attached, please email
me back and I will see to it that said plans are submitted to you upon request.
Please call with any questions_
Tracy Spencer
Insight Engineering, Inc.
1
Conn. Angelina V
From:
Sent:
To:
Tracy Spencer [tspencer@insightengineering.com]
Monday, April 21,20084:30 PM
Conn, Angelina V; Holmes, Christine B; Akers, William P; Brewer, Scott I; Fogarty, Michael D;
Ellison, Christopher M; Duncan, Gary R; Redden, Nick; Hohlt, William G; Duffy, John M;
Littlejohn, David W; Krueskamp, Theresa A; del@co.hamilton.in.us; jtl@co.hamilton.in.us;
bmg@co.hamilton.in.us; shirley.hu nter@duke-energy.com; Rfarrand@ccs.k12.inus;
david. malone@SUG.com; mwestermeier@carmel.in.us; G RH@co.hamilton.in.us;
jason. kirkman@mybrighthouse,com; jen n ifer.martlett@veoliawaterna.com;
ryan. harm an@ctrwd.org; cshupperd@vectren.com; Gary. McNamee@duke-energy.com;
Huffman, David; Foley, Amanda J; gilko@crossroadengineers.com; dale,m.sparks@usps.gov;
ron.morris@aes.com
Kevin Merritt; Herschel W. Roll; G. Bradley Myrick; Donald W. Fisher PE
Circle K, 1230 S. Rangeline Road, Carmel, IN - 08040008 ADLS Amend (lEI 9760ck)-
Lighting, Landscape, and Sign plans
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
9760CK-L 1.pdf; 9760CK-LP1 01.pdf; 9760CK-SIGN-1 OF 4.pdf; 9760CK-SIGN-2 OF 4.pdf;
9760CK-SIGN-3 OF 4.pdf; 9760CK-SIGN-4 OF 4.pdf
~
~
~
~
~
~
9760CK-L1.pdf 9760CK-LPI01.pdf 9760CK-SIGN-l OF 9760CK-SIGN-2 OF 9760CK-SIGN-3 OF 9760CK-SIGN-4 OF
(969 KB) (635 KB) 4.pdf (615 KB... 4.pdf (521 KB... 4.pdf (460 KB". 4.pdf (335 KB...
To all TAC
Members,
Please find attached Lighting, Landscape, and Sign plans for the Circle K at 1230 S.
Rangeline Road that have been submitted to the City for ADLS Amend.
Although the above will not be on a TAC agenda, it was suggested that this email be sent
to you and comments are welcomed. If you need paper copies of the attached, please email
me back and I will see to it that said plans are submitted to you upon request.
Please call with any questions.
Tracy Spencer
Insight Engineering, Inc.
1
Conn. Angelina V
From:
Sent:
To:
Tracy Spencer [tspencer@insightengineering.coml
Monday, April 21, 20084:24 PM
Conn, Angelina V; Holmes, Christine B; Akers, William P; Brewer, Scott I; Fogarty, Michael D;
Ellison, Christopher M; Duncan, Gary R; Redden, Nick; Hohlt, William G; Duffy, John M;
Littlejohn, David W; Krueskamp, Theresa A; del@co.hamilton.in.us; jtl@co.hamilton.in.us;
bmg@co.hamilton.in.us; shirley.hunter@duke-energy.com; Rfarrand@ccs.k12.in.us;
david. m alone@SUG.com; mwestermeier@carmel.in.us; GRH@co.hamilton.in.us;
jason. kirkman@mybrighthouse.com; jennifer. martlett@veoliawaterna.com;
ryan .harman@ctrwd.org; cshupperd@vectren.com; Gary.McNamee@duke-energy.com;
Huffman, David; Foley, Amanda J; gilko@crossroadengineers.com; dale.m,sparks@usps.gov;
ron.morris@aes.com
Kevin Merritt; Donald W. Fisher PE; Herschel W. Roll; G. Bradley Myrick
Circle K, 1230 S. Rangeline Road, Carmel, IN - 08040008 ADLS Amend {lEI 9760ck)-Site
Package part 1
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
9760CK-C200.pdf; 9760CK-C201.pdf; 9760CK-C202.pdf; 9760CK-C203.pdf; 9760CK-
C204.pdf
~.
I~
~
~
~
~
9760CK-C200.pdf 9760CK-C201.pdf 9760CK-C202.pdf 9760CK-C203.pdf 9760CK-C204.pdf
(667 KB) (798 KB) (1 MB) (815 KB) (3 MB)
To all TAC Members,
please find attached Site plans (Part 1) for the Circle K at 1230 S.
Rangeline Road that have been submitted, to the City for ADLS Amend.
Although the above will not be on a TAC agenda, it was suggested that this email be sent
to you and comments are welcomed. If you need paper copies of the attached, please email
me back and I will see to it that said plans are submitted to you upon request.
please call with any questions.
Tracy Spencer
Insight Engineering, Inc.
Conn, Angelina V
Cc:
Subject:
Tracy Spencer [tspencer@insightengineering.com]
Monday, April 21, 20084:27 PM
Conn, Angelina V; Holmes, Christine B; Akers, William P; Brewer, Scott I; Fogarty, Michael D;
Ellison, Christopher M; Duncan, Gary R; Redden, Nick; Hohlt, William G; Duffy, John M;
Littlejohn, David W; Krueskamp, Theresa A; del@cQ,hamilton.in.us; jtl@co.hamilton.in.us;
bmg@co.hamilton.in,us; shirley.hunter@duke"energy.com; Rfarrand@ccs.k12.in.us;
david, malone@SUG.com; mwestermeier@carmel.in,us; G RH@co.hamilton.in.us;
jason .kirkmah@mybrighthouse.com; jennifer.martlett@veoliawaterna,com;
ryan .harrnan@ctrwd.org; cshupperd@vectren,com; Gary.McNamee@duke-energy.com;
Huffman, David; Foley, Amanda J; gilko@crossroadengineers,com; dale.m,sparks@usps.gov;
ron.morris@aes.coh1
Kevin Merritt; Herschel W. Roll; Donald W. Fisher PE; G. Bradley Myrick
Circle K, 1230 S. Rangeline Road, Carmel, IN - 08040008 ADLS Amend (lEI 9760ck)-Site
Package part 2
From:
Sent:
To:
Attachments:
9760CK-C801.pdf; 9760CK-C802.pdf; 9760CK-C901.pdf; 9760CK-CS.pdf
~
~
~
~
9760CK-C801. pdf 9760CK-C802.pdf 9760CK-C901.pdf 9760CK-CS.pdf (1
(710 KB) (535 KB) (939 KB) MB)
To all TAC Members,
Please find attached Site plans {Part 2} for the Circle K at 1230 S.
Rangeline Road that have been submitted to the City for ADLS Amend.
Although the above will not be on a TAC agenda, it was suggested that this email be sent
to you and comments are welcomed. If you need paper copies of the attached, please email
me back and I will see to it that said plans are submitted to you upon request.
Please call with any questions.
Tracy Spencer
Insight Engineering, Inc.
Conn. Angelina V
From:
Sent:
To:
Tracy Spencer [tspencer@insightengineering.com]
Monday, April 21,20084:21 PM
Conn, Angelina V; Holmes, Christine B; Akers, William P; Brewer, Scott I; Fogarty, Michael D;
Ellison, Christopher M; Duncan, Gary R; Redden, Nick; Hohlt, William G; Duffy, John M;
Littlejohn, David W; Krueskamp, Theresa A; del@co.hamilton.in.us; jtl@co.hamilton.in.us;
bmg@co.hamilton.in.us; shirley.hunter@duke-energy.com; Rfarrand@ccs.k12.in.us;
david. malone@SUG.com; mwestermeier@carmel.in.us; G RH@co.hamilton.in.us;
jason .kirkman@mybrighthouse.com; jennifer.martlett@veoliawaterna.com;
ryan .harman@ctrwd.org; cshupperd@vectren.com; Gary.McNamee@duke-energy.com;
Huffman, David; Foley, Amanda J; gilko@crossroadengineers.com; dale.m.sparks@usps.gov;
ron.morris@aes.com
Kevin Merritt; Herschel W. Roll; G. Bradley Myrick; Donald W. Fisher PE
Circle K, 1230 S. Rangeline Road. Carmel, IN - 08040008 ADLS Amend (lEI 9760ck)-
Architectural Package
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
9760CK-A 1.pdf; 9760CK-A2.pdf; 9760CK-A3.pdf; 9760CK-A4.pdf
~
~
~
~
9760CK-Al.pdf
(520 KB)
976DCK-A2.pdf
(704 KB)
9760CK-A3.pdf
(621 KB)
9760CK-A4.pdf
(488 KB)
To all TAC Members,
Please find attached Architectural plans for the Circle K at 1230 S.
Rangeline Road that have been submitted to the City for ADLS Amend.
Although the above will not be on a TAC agenda, it was suggested that this email be sent
to you and comments are welcomed. If you need paper copies of the attached, please email
me back and I will see to it that said plans are submitted to you upon request.
Please call with any questions.
Tracy Spencer
Insight Engineering, Inc.
1
City of Carmel
Via email: dfisher@insightengineering.com
Original by hand
March 21, 2008
Donald Fisher
Insight Engineering
9765 Randall Drive, Suite C
Indianapolis, Indiana 46280
1{'f'V\.~
~ ~{C(]V\c..L
RE: Circle KlShell Station (08030019-08030025 V) \€.---W(
Dear Mr. Fisher:
This letter is in response to your Development Standards Variance application for the Circle
KlShell station project. Comments and concerns are as follows:
1. Please provide details on outdoor storage to be used, if any, for items like bagged
ice, kerosene, etc.
2. Please provide details for vacuums and air hoses, iflhey are going to be used.
3. When submitting packets for Board review, please include an elevation indicating
what the west elevation of the building will look like when it is approached from
West Carmel Drive. Include any infol111ation about illumination, etc.
4. Will any hoses be provided outside to help wash down sidewalks etc? If so,
w11ere will they be located?
5. Please provide an elevation (east side only is fine) indicating to what extent
rooftop mechanicals are screened.
6. Please consider adding a transom element above the doors to match the element
above the wiildows.
7. We would prefer to see a full side\valk connection extended along the south side
of the site for pedestrian access, rather than a striped section of pavement.. Access
to the dumpster and vendor parking could be accomplished with a rolled curb.
8. Please consider moving the north sidewalk access east of the ingress/egress, and
eliminating the sidewalk connection from the public sidewalk to the bike parking
section. Tills wouLd also reduce the amount of impervious surface, by about 50
linear feet, as well as address some of the grading concerns.
9. For the canopy replacement, please consider adding a cornice element, similar to
or matching the comice on the building.
10. Please note, if it is necessary to move the existing ground signs to help
accomplish needed site improvements, or to make the signs more visible, this
could be considered by the Department as an extension of the original sign
variances, depending on the final location.
Page 1
ONE CIVIC SQUA.RE
Ci\R1vffiL, INDIANA" 46m2
317 /571-2417
Please submit revised materials prior to the scheduled BZA hearing, as part of the packet
submission. Additional comments may be made after the requested revisions have been
submitted.
Sincerely,
Christine Barton-Holmes
Plam1ing Administrator
08030019-25 V/Circle K/Shell Station
cc: Mike Hollibaugh
Angie Conn
Gary Duncan
David Littlejohn
Scott Brewer
File
Page 2
ONE CIV1C SQUARE
CAIUVIEL, INDIANA 46032
317 /571-2417
Conn. Angelina V
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Conn, Angel ina V
Thursday, March 20,20082:26 PM
'tspencer@insightengineering.com'
(IEI9760ck) Circle K: Carmel dr and Range line Rd
Hi, Tracy:
We will consider the Circle K revamp an ADLS amendment that would not be a public hearing
and would only go to the plan commission-speclal scudies committee for review/approval.
(The public hearing with public notice will occur with the board of zoning appeals.) The
next committee meeting is MaY 8, 6pm. The very latest you should submit the ADLS amendment
application to our dept is April 18, Friday. This gives us time to assign a docket number,
review the plans, etc. The filing fee and 8 info packets/brochures are due here on April
28, Monday, at noon. The application & instructions are online at:
http://www.ci.carmel.in.usjservicesjDocsjOOCSPCA2008PDFapplicationsIADLS~20&%20ADLS%
20AMEND.APP%202008.pdf
~. ------
However, we will also want you to email plans to all (TAC member~ around 2 weeks prior to
the committee meeting to make sure there are no issues wlth the proposal. A list of TAC
members can be found online at: http://www.ci.carmel.in.us/services/OOCS/TAC2007/TAC%
20members%20revised%2009.07.07.pdf . You can send out a mass email with a POF file of your
proposal and ask them for review comments/feedback, but let them know that you will not
actually be appearing on any TAC meeting agenda.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Angie Conn, Planning Administrator
Dept. of Community Services - Planning & Zoning
1 Civic Square, 3rd Floor
City of Carmel, IN 46032
p. 317-571-2417 f. 317-571-2426
aconn@carmel.in.gov
-----Original Message-----
From: Holmes, Christine B
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 2:06 PM
To: 'Tracy Spencer'
Cc: Conn, Angelina V
Subj ect: RE: (IEI9760ck) Circle K
Tracy,
Angie Conn is the planner who will be handling your ADLS petition. I'm forwarding your
questions on to her, as she \-muld better be able to advise you 011 deadlines and the final
process.
Christine
Christine Barton-Holmes
Planning Administrator
Department of Community services
City of Carmel
One Civic Square
Carmel, Indiana 46032
317.571.2424
317.571.2426 fax
-----Original Message-----
From: Tracy Spencer [mailto:tspencer@insightengineering.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 2:10 PM
To: Holmes, Christine B
Subj ect: (IEI9760ck) Circle K
Page 1 of2
Conn, Angelina V
From: Holmes, Christine B
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 11 :39 AM
To: Blanchard, Jim E; Boone, Rachel M.; Brennan, Kevin S (kbrennan@carmel,in.gov); Brewer, Scott I; Conn,
Angelina V; DeVore, Laura B; Dolan, Veronica A; Donahue-Wold, Alexia K; Duncan, Gary R; Ellison,
Christopher M; Foley, Amanda J; Hancock, Ramona B; Hohlt, William G; Hollibaugh, Mike P; Holmes,
Christine B; Keeling, Adrienne M; Lillard, Sarah N; Littlejohn, David W; Mast, Darren
(dmast@carmel.in,gov); Mindham, Daren; Miser, Craig; Stewart, Lisa M; Tingley, Connie S; Weddington,
Trudy A.
Cc: 'Tracy Spencer'; Don Fisher
Subject: Docket No, Assignment: (V) Circle K/Shell (#08030019-08030025 V)
I have updated the file. j have contacted the petitioner and issued the necessary Docket Numbers for (V) Circle K/Shell.
They will be the following:
Docket No, 08030019 V
Docket No 08030020 V
Docket No 08030021 V
Docket No, 08030022 V
Docket No. 08030023 V
Docket No. 08030024 V
Docket No. 08030025 V
Total Fee: $4180.00
$1090.00
$515.00
$515.00
$515.00
$515.00
$515.00
$515.00
Circle K/Shell
The applicant seeks the following development standards variance approvals:
Docket No. 08030019 V Section 23F.05.01 B Build-to line greater than 10'
Docket No; 08030020 V Section 23F.07.02 Height under 26'
Docket No, 08030021 V Section 23F.07.01 One occupiable floor
Docket No. 08030022 V Section 23F.08.01 Floor Area Ratio minimum 0.5
Docket No. 08030023 V Se-ction 23F.06.02 Frontage minimum 70%
Docke:t No; 08030024 V Section 23F.15.02 Parking located in front of building
Docket No. 08030025 V Section 23F.11.03 Landscaping & screening
The site is located at 1230 South Rangeline Road and is zoned B3/Business, within the Carmel Drive/Rangeline Road
Overlay.
Filed by Donald Fisher of Insight Engineering for Mac's Convenience Stores, LLC.
Petitioner, please note the following:
1. This item will not need to go to a meeting of the Technical Advisory Committee,
2. Mailed and Published Public Notice needs to occur no later than Thursday, April 3. Published notice is required
within the Indianapolis Star. Note: the placement of a public hearing sign on the property is also required
by the BZA Rules of Procedure, Article VI, Section 6 (see attached pdf).
3. The Proof of Notice will need to be received by this Department no later than noon, Friday, April 25. Failure to
submit Proof of Notice by this time will result in the tabling of the petition.
4. The Filing Fee and Nine (9) Informational Packets must be delivered to BZA Secretary Connie Tingley no later
than NOON. Friday, April 18, 2008. Failure to submit Informational Packets by this time will result in the
automatic tabling of the petition to the May agenda of the BZA,
5. This Item will appear on the April 28, 2008 agenda of the Board of Zoning Appeals under Public Hearings.
6. The petitioner will need to provide a fully filled-out Findings-of-Fact sheet for each petition the night of the
meeting for the Board's use (Sheet 8). On Ballot sheets, only fill out docket number, petitioner, and date (Sheet 7).
Ballot sheets must be collated.
PETITIONER: refer to your instruction sheet for more details.
3/2012008
Conn, Angelina V
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Donald Fisher (dfisher@insightengineering.com]
Wednesday, February 06,20088:51 AM
Tracy Spencer; Holmes, Christine B
Kevin Merritt; Conn, Angelina V; Boone, Rachel M.; G. Bradley Myrick; Herschel W. Roll
RE: Circle K (lEI 9760ck)
Christine,
I am stunned.
K already.
Unfortunately I shared the positive results of our last meeting with Circle
I need a clarification on the determination that this is not a remodel and addition. As
we previously discussed, if it was a new structure, we would have designed it
significantly different and Slightly relocated from this plan. Our plan follows the
meeting that we had with you and Mike a few months ago. Do we have some definitive
definitions you are relying on in this determination?
Additionally, if we decide to construct as you now suggest, what support do we have from
planning Staff and the Mayor's office with this long list of variances? It sounds like
too much of a long shot. I know you cannot guarantee how the BZA will react to this, but
I need to know what your office believes and how much support we will have to move forward
with this expensive process.
As you know, if we can do the version that you are now suggesting, this will be a better
project for everyone.
Thanks for your help in this matter.
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: Holmes, Christine B [mailto:cholmes@carmel.in.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 5:46 PM
To: Tracy Spencer
Cc: Don Fisher; Herschel W. Roll; G. Bradley Myrick; Boone, Rachel M.; Conn, Angelina V
Subject: RE: Circle K (lEI 9760ck)
Tracy,
We've had our meeting and discussions, and have determined that although the building
would be increased in size by less than 50%, it would fall under the Overlay because it is
a new structure. The Overlay provides for 50% expansions of existing structures. On the
positive side, this means you're no longer constrained by the 50% requirement, and can
build a larger building.
The variances you would need
1. Multiple signs facing the
2. Build-to line--this would
Building height under 26'.
4. Number of stories (2 useable stories required) 5. FAR under minimum of .5 6. >70%
street frontage 8. Location of parking Plus the DP and ADLS Amend, which can go through
concurrently with the variances.
to file are as follows:
ROW
include both the building and the canopy,
as one variance 3.
We also have the following suggestions for the building and site. We think the design is
nearly there, but there are some details we'd like to see that will take the building to
the full level of following the intent of the Overlay. They are:
1. Increasing the size of the cornice
2. Using fluted or otherwise decorated columns at the entrance--the color is fine, but
we'd like to see more detailing.
3. More window trim--either painted to match or contrast with the brick, or lintels/sills,
etc.
4. More prominent belt course, perhaps placed higher on the building and in a more
visible/contrasting color to emphasize.
5. Goosenecks instead of internal illumination, on both the Circle K signs and the canopy
columns.
6. White canopy, with either the Shell name/stripe, or the scallop logo, instead of yellow
(yellow perhaps as accent).
7. Darker/more red brick, perhaps to highlight/emphasize the red in the logos.
Also, the plan Commission and BZA are likely to ask for green building elements. Some
elements that could make a big difference in terms of energy usage etc would be a solar
canopy; skylights (studies have shown they increase sales by up to 40%); additional
windows in the office area; and a white or light membrane roof.
We realize this is not necessarily what you would prefer to hear. There are still some
concerns in the Mayor's Office regarding the site design of this project, as well. We
will be more than happy to work with you on this project and answer any questions that may
arise as it moves through the process, but unfortunately we cannot guarantee the outcome
of the process.
Christine Barton-Holmes
Planning Administrator
Department of Community Services
City of Carmel
One Civic Square
Carmel, Indiana 46032
317.571.2424
317.571.2426 fax
-----Original Message-----
From: Tracy Spencer [mailto:tspencer@insightengineering.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 3:43 PM
To: Holmes, Christine B
Cc: Don Fisher; Herschel W. Roll; G. Bradley Myrick
Subject: Circle K (lEI 9760ck)
Christine,
Pursuant to our conversation on 2/5/08 at 3:38pm regarding the Circle K project, this
email is a clarification regarding your comment about our building being over by SOsf.
That as we discussed on the phone is not correct. The current building is 1901sf and the
proposed building is 2849sf.
This does keep us under the 50% as laid out in the ordinances regarding the overlay. We
are technically allowed 2851.Ssf before the construction would be considered to be over
50% of the existing building.
I look forward to speaking with you tomorrow regarding the results of the meeting and
finding out for sure for our filing purposes the status on the canopy and a clearer
picture of the variances that we will be needing.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Tracy Spencer
Permit Processor
Insight Engineering, Inc.
!DSPAM:47a8e72513700183832737l!
2