The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFindings of Factr ~~ ` CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION - Carmel, Indiana SUBDIVISION WAIVER ~~ FINDINGS OF FACT ~ Docket N : 78-03-aSW ~ ~~ Petitioner: ra Builders. Fnc. Section Varied: 6~3-20"~ Brief Description of Variance: Private Streets - Waterbridee Drive, Waterbridge Court, and Cold Creek Court -See Exhibit A In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of a variance, the Plan Commission should consider the following: - The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfaze of the community. - The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner. - The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood. - The strict application of terms of the evidence to the property will constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is sought. - The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the Comprehensive Plan. Based on all the evidence presented by the Petitioner, I approve of the requested subdivision variance. I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. Dated this 20th day of January, 2004. ~c ommission Member H:Vanet\Dura\lakes-Hamilton\F of F 78-03-aSW.doc ~= r~ i' 211 H H r3 L% ~'~ ~.. CITY OF CARMEL PLAN COMMISSION CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No.: 78-03- PP Amend Name of Subdivision: The Lakes at Hamilton Place Petitioner: Dura Builders, Inc. FINDINGS OF FACT -PRIMARY PLAT AMENDMENT APPROVAL. 2 Dated this 19t" day of December, 2003. C~~~~LAY PLAN COMMISSION c bn Q n ~A Q~,OI,h\.. Marilyn J.~{n'der~ce President AST: ~~ ~ // Raknona Hancock, Secretary, Carmel/Clay Plan Commission 1-^Vauet\Dura\lakes-Hamilton\F oCF Primary Plat Amend.doc +" ~ ~ .~ FINDINGS OF FACT FORM FOR PRIMARY PLAT AMENDMF,NT CONSIDERATION Carmel Plan Commission Carmel, Indiana Docket No.: 124-03 PP Amend Name of Subdivision: The Lakes at Hamilton Place Petitioner: Dura Builders, Inc. Based upon all the evidence presented by the petitioner, 1 determine that the amended plat complies with standards of the Carmel Clay Subdivision Control Ordinance. I hereby approve of the primary plat amendment as submitted with the following specific conditions as agreed to by the petitioner. Condition 1 Condition 2. Condition 3. I hereby disapprove of the primary plat amendment as submitted for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. DATED THIS 19"I'H DAY OF DECEMBER, 2003. CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION i M r~lyn J. Berson, Vice President ATTE6~f: `~ Ramdria Hancock, Secretary, Carmel/Clay Plan Commission CARMEL(CLAY PLAN COMMISSION Carmel, Indiana SUBDTVISION WAIVER FINDINGS OF FACT Docket No.: 78-03-bSW Petitioner: Dura Builders, Inc. Section Varied: 6.3.7 Brief Description of Variance: Cul-de-sac length - to allow 2 cul-de-sacs loneer than 600'. In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufticient proof to permit the granting of a variance, the Plan Commission should consider the following: The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community. The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner. The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood. - The strict application of terms of the evidence to the property will constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property far which the variance is sought. - The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the Comprehensive Plan. Based on all the evidence presented by the Petitioner, I approve of the requested subdivision variance. I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons: 2. 3 Dated this 19`h day of December, 2003. CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION Marilyn X!Anderson, Vice President ATTI~T: L--sn / // Ramona Hancock, Secretary, Carmel/Clay Plan Commission I-f:Vanet\Dura\Lakcs-Hamilton\P of P 78-03-bSW.doc CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION Carmel, Indiana SUBDIVISION WAIVER FINDINGS OF FACT Docket No.: 78-03-eSW Petitioner: Dura Builders. Inc. Section Varied: 6.3.1 Brief Description of Variance: Street centerline offsets - to allow offsets of less than 150'. In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of a variance, the Plan Commission should consider the following: The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community. - The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner. - The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood. - The strict application of terms of the evidence to the property will constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is sought. The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the Comprehensive Plan. V Based on all the evidence presented by the Petitioner, I approve of the requested subdivision variance. I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons: 2. 3 Dated this 19"' day of December, 2003. CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION 'Matilnyn J.~'nderson, Vice President ~~ Rarrlona Hancock, Secretary, Carmel/Clay Plan Commission H-Vanct\Dura\Lakes-Hamilton\F of F' 78-03-cS W.doc CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION Carmel, Indiana SUBDIVISION WAIVER FINDINGS OF FACT Docket No.: 78-03-dS W Petitioner: Dura Builders, Inc. Section Varied: 6.3.15 Brief Description of Variance: Minimum street centerline radius - to allow a reduction of certain street centerline radiuses from 150' to 60' and to 100'. In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permiC the granting of a variance, the Plan Commission should consider the following: The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of [he community. 1'he use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner. The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such condition is not due to the genera] conditions of the neighborhood. The strict application of terms of the evidence to the property will constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is sought. The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the Comprehensive Plan Based on all the evidence presented by the Petitioner, I approve of the requested subdivision variance. I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons: 2. 3. Dated this 19'r day of December, 2003. CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION Marinnlyn~ Anderson, Vice President AT"BEST: ~~ Raytnona Hancock, Secretary, Carmel/Clay Plan Commission H:Vanet\Dura\Lakes-Hamilton\F of F 78-03-05 W.doc CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION Carmel, Indiana SUBDIVISION WAIVER FINDINGS OF FACT Docket No.: 78-03-eS W Petitioner: Dura Builders, Inc. Section Varied: 7.1 Brief Description of Variance: Minimum Standard Open Space Requirement (SOSR). In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of a variance, the Plan Commission should consider the following: The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and genera] welfare of the community. The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner. The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such condition is not due to the genera] conditions of the neighborhood. The strict application of terms of the evidence to the property will constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is sought. - The gant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the Comprehensive Plan. Based on all the evidence presented by the Petitioner, I approve of the requested subdivision variance. I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons: 1 2. 3. Dated this ] 9th day of December, 2003. CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION 'Marilyn J,/1(nderson, Vice President AT7~ST: ~.~7 Ramona Hancock, Secretary, Carmel/Clay Plan Commission H:VanetVDuraVLakes-HamiltonAF of P 78-03-cSwdoc