The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLandscape InformationcQ 0 0 n ~_ cri a cfl N O O cp .A Ut D o -a ~~ ~~ r ~ ~ m m CDG CONSULTING INC. ~~ n°~1OSw~ ~. 'rpr = ~ - L AND- n ~ „ SCAPE ~ e . m ° ~ ~ ~ PLAN m m m m li ~ ~ ~ ~ € I ~ a ~ ~ s € I ~ £ i ~ g ~~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~~ ~ pl' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ i ! R 4 R A Y Y fg : x ~ x ~ Y 5 ~ " G ~, ° 5 " ~ Y H a l • I e 9 • B e l r 9 • i • I s 9 s l • 9 • I o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ # ~ R ~ &' R F F ~ & ~ F & 8 ~ ~ ~ i l i i i ~ I ~ HOTEL INDIGO ~ CLAY TWF HAMILTON COUNTY, IN ', developed by= DYKSTRA BUILDING 8485 KEYSTONE CROSSING INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46240 ~~~ :~~ ~ ~ r ~ e $ a~~~: it ~~~~~~~ Page 1 of 4 Conn, Angelina V From: David Lach [dlachC~3cripe.biz] Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 5:01 PM. To: Brewer, Scott I; Chris Wiseman; Conn, Angelina V Cc: cdgincCsbcglobal.net; Jamie Browning; Terry Hebert; Sara Farny; Sherri Wilson; Paula Gartner; Kristy Myers; rroyer@bdmd.com; Duncan, Gary R; Foley, Amanda J; Redden, Nick Subject: RE: tree preservation for hotel indigo site/browning infrastructure Attachments: FuturePhase.pdf; PhaselwContours.pdf; ProposedBufferandDrainageEasement.pdf; -001.tif Dear Scott I have reviewed your comments and the project history with Chris since I have been involved with the project since its beginning. I have attached as -001.tif the landscape plan which was submitted and approved as part of the DP submittal package. As I recall, at your request, Cripe field located the trees located within the buffer yards based on the caliper size. Browning committed to preserving those trees as delineated in this plan. As you will see, the proposed storm water detention/water quality treatment basins have always been located within the 90' Build To Line with an overlap into the outermost 30' Greenbelt. This was approved as part of the DP. To address your concerns regarding the tree preservation areas being located in the drainage easement, attached are exhibits which modify the drainage easement. The proposed sketches allow for planting areas as well as the tree preservation. This should alleviate the issue of trees being located in an easement whose primary use is drainage. The exhibits show the areas with dimensions and proposed contours. Since we are only planning to construct phase 1 improvements at this time, we thought it would be prudent to send the design data for the future development area to the northeast which also shows the future basin with the tree preservation areas. .~(We will also prepare a Tree Preservation Plan which will show construction fen_ci~n as the protective barrier rather tha the si nce as you in icated~ince roll caning is very aware o thf e tree preservation issue, I am sure tha the clearing and cons ruc ion activities will be emphatically addressed with the contractor prior to the commencement of work. So as to avoid any confusion, the trees being preserved will be shown on all affected sheets of the construction plan set. Since we are in this overlap situation relative to the landscape area and the drainage easement, we are also asking Gary Duncan to approve this proposed scenario since we believe it should be acceptable to both agencies concerned. An important item to also note is that the water quality basins will be planted and seeded with native plant material. Once these areas are fully established, the affected area will be greener than the typical detention ponds constructed along the majority of the developed portions of the Meridian Street Corridor. Please review the attached documents and contact Chris or me with any questions. We believe these revisions should be acceptable and ask for your approval so that we can continue in the permit process. Thank you for your assistance and have a great weekend/holiday break/vacation. We appreciate your willingness to check on this while you are on vacation. David A. Lach, PE Client Services Director 12/22/2008 Page 2 of 4, Cripe Architects + Engineers 3939 Priority Way South Drive, Suite 400 Indianapolis, Indiana 46240 general office line: 317.844.6777 direct line and direct fax: 317.706.6361 cell phone: 317.997.6423 email: dlach@cripe.biz website: www.cripe.biz From: Brewer, Scott I [mailto:SBrewer@carmel.in.gov] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 11:52 AM To: Chris Wiseman; Conn, Angelina V Cc: cdginc@sbcglobal.net; Jamie Browning; Terry Hebert; Sara Farny; Sherri Wilson; Paula Gartner; David Lach; Kristy Myers; rroyer@bdmd.com; Duncan, Gary R; Foley, Amanda ]; Redden, Nick Subject: RE: tree preservation for hotel indigo site/browning infrastructure Dear Chris: You wrote "The Tree Preservation Plan for the development was originally submitted and approved during the Development Plan filings so no new plan is being proposed at this time" Looking through my files for this submittal I can not find any plan labeled "Tree Preservation Plan", so it would be appreciated if you could forward me another copy. In looking at those original plans for the development, they seem some what conceptual in natural. Now that the engineering has been done for construction plans, I am asking that a TREE PRESERVATION PLAN be submitted in relation to the construction drawings. It would show graphically and in word the methods being used to protect the trees and vegetation trom construction equipment and processes. The single note on sheet C401 that says, "NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO AVOID THE EXISTING TREES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND TAKE CAUTION WITH EARTH WORK EQUIPMENT IN VICINITY' is not sufficient. The circle it appears around only refers to a group of six large trees in the middle of the US 31 side of the project. There are trees all along that side of the project that must be preserved. A complete Tree Preservation Plan needs to be submitted showing all the existing trees that are to remain on site, the Tree Protection Best Management Practices (BMPs) that are being used to preserve them, all this on an engineered site plan that includes other pertinent construction information like roadways and utilities. The existence of this plan shall be noted on other plans as needed, such the grading plan, the stormwater pollution prevention plan, etc., and made available to contractors that are working on site to prevent accidental oversights such as unscheduled tree removal. The entire greenbelt on the US 31 side should not be place in a drainage easement. The Trees that are being preserved should be placed in a landscape easement of some type (landscape, or tree preservation easement). If the entire greenbelt becomes a drainage easement, that becomes its highest priority and any landscaping or preservation to no longer protected. There should be no arguing about this point; the Greenbelt is stated in our Ordinance. I appreciate the update on Randy at Browning Day and his progress on the landscape plan. And I also appreciate the anxiousness with Mr. Browning is trying to get this wrapped up for Hotel Indigo. I will be off for two weeks starting tomorrow, but I will try to keep an eye on the submittals. In case you could use further education or technical guidance on tree preservation techniques, there is a great resource book available from ISA titled TREES AND DEVELOPMENT - A TECHNICAL GUIDE TO PRESERVATION OF TREES DURING LAND DEVELOPMENT at http://secure.isa-arbor.com/webstore/Trees-and-Development-A-Technical-Guide-to- Preservation-of-Trees-During-Land-Development-P47C24.as~x Thank you for your time. Scott Brewer, City Forester Environmental Planner, DOCS City of Carmel, One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 12/22/2008 Page 3 of 4 PH: 317-571-2478 FAX: 317-571-2426 Urban Forestry is the center of sustainability for municipalities From: Chris Wiseman [mailto:cwiseman@cripe.biz] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 10:46 AM To: Conn, Angelina V; Brewer, Scott I Cc: cdginc@sbcglobal.net; Jamie Browning; Terry Hebert; Sara Farny; Sherri Wilson; Paula Gartner; David Lach; Kristy Myers; rroyer@bdmd.com; Duncan, Gary R; Foley, Amanda J; Redden, Nick Subject: RE: tree preservation for hotel indigo site/browning infrastructure Angie and Scott, The Tree Preservation Plan for the development was originally submitted and approved during the Development Plan filings so no new plan is being proposed at this time. The proposed construction documents which we are requesting final approval dated 12-10-08 illustrate saving all the tress located within that area previously defined. The greenbelt and ponds are located in an easement defined as drainage along the US 31 corridor, which has been discussed and has been approved by the City throughout the TAC process. Is Scott suggesting adding another easement overlapping the drainage easement for buffer planting? This has not been completed at this time since the 30' greenbelt is defined in oridinance relative to the US 31 roadway. Please advise. Jamie is working with Browning Day on the Planting Plan for this development, which he requested during the last TAC meeting. Randy at Browning Day can advise on the status and note any issues Scott may have in regards to the proposed plan. If Scott Brewer or Dave Barnes has specific comments relative to this infrastructure project please advise so we can address accordingly. Browning is very anxious in breaking ground early January for this new development in the City of Carmel and a delay in city approvals will hold up the construction of the infrastructure project as well as the Indigo Hotel. Please CC all on correspondence since this impacts everyone and we would like to resolve any outstanding issues as efficiently and fast as possible. Thanks Chris Thanks, Chris Wiseman, PE Project Manager Cripe Architects + Engineers 3939 Priority Way South Drive, Suite 400 ~ Indianapolis, Indiana 46240 Telephone: 317.844.6777 Direct Line and Direct Fax:317.706.6429 Email: cwiseman@cripe.biz Website: www.cripe.biz From: Conn, Angelina V [mailto:Aconn@carmel.in.gov] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 10:12 AM To: Chris Wiseman Cc: cdginc@sbcglobal.net Subject: tree preservation for hotel indigo site/browning infrastructure Hi Chris -thanks for all of the info you have sent thus far. I am sending this email to you because this issue will probably 12/22/2008 Page 4 of 4 come up soon. I sent the message, below, to Scott brewer and dave Barnes, relating to the tree preservation of certain trees between the pond and US 31. I think Scott thought that there was a landscape preservation easement along there, but I think it is just the 30-ft wide greenbelt. He will probably want a tree preservation plan submitted so that these trees easement. is separate from the greenbelt. But, I will let you work that out with him. "On the plans submitted by both Cripe and CDG, 1 see that there is the 30-ff wide greenbelt shown on the hotel indigo plans, which is good. Also, the hotel indigo plans and the Gripe plans show the specific area o/existing trees that will be preserved in that greenbelt, between the pond and US 31. 1 think Scott wants a tree preservation plan submitted, so that these frees are protected during construction of the retention/detention facility. The Tree Preservation Easement is shown on the original development plan, on the east side of the whole development, adjacent fo the North Meridian Heights neighborhood. The US 31 overlay calls for preservation of a certain number of trees in the bufferyards: ZO chapter 238.10.04 Protection of Existing Trees: Sites with existing trees or stands of trees should make reasonable efforts to protect and incorporate them into the overall site design. The Landscape Plan must preserve not less than seventy percent (70%) of all trees that are: A. nine-inch (g') DBH or larger, and 8. located within the Greenbelt, Planting Strips and perimeter buffering." Let me know if I can help any further.. Thanks, Angie Conn, Planning Administrator 12/22/2008 i~ /, ! .' / ~` ~~ ~ ~ ' ~~ ~. ~/ ? ~ >~' ~ / ~ ~~ ,- / ~ ~ ,~ _ _~( ~~ ~ / h / ~~; ti;: % 4a ~ o~, ~" ' <V' '~~ ~ / ~~~ / ''~ ~ ~/ ~ ~; / j / / / ~ ~ ~b~ ~; / / / ,_ ~ / / ~~ FIELD TILE ' ~ ~ / R'SEP. ~ / ~ / ~ / / - / / f ~ / / ~ / / / /~ ~ f i / ~ ~ .. ._ ~_-_ `~ •~ / / 1 ,~~'` y / ,~ / ~ 1 C/ / / t /'; '`~~ ' / ', ~ ~ ~ / i' _. ~~ / ~ 7// / / / / 1. / o / ~ ~ i/ ~ ~ ~ i ~ -~ ~ ~~ / Cam/ -~ 20' BSL rc-~ ~ ~ ~` % ~ / RY DETENTION /WATER QUALITY POND NO 1 80TTOM OF POND ELEVATION = 866.00 WATER QUALITY ELEVATION 867.25 8" GATE VALVE ~ / 10 YEAR STORM ELEVATION = 869.26 LOCATED IN , / / 100 YEAR STORM ELEVATION = 810.98 GRASS AREA ~ VOLUME OF DETENTION 3.30 ACRE-FT SPILLWAY ELEVATION = 870.98 12"x8" TEE- / / 100 YEAR ELEVATION IN SPILLWAY = 871.36 ~ TOP OF BANK ELEVATION = 873.00 3:1 TRANSVERSE SLOPE ON SLOE SLOPES / ~ f, 22.5' 12" ISOLATION 1 ,~ - r L~` ~,~ Vh pRY DETENTION /WATER DUALITY POND N0. 2 BOTTOM OF POND ELEVATION = 867.50 WATER DUALITI' ELEVATION = 866.5D 10 YEAR STORM ELEVATION = 869.34 10D YEAR STORM F,LEVATION = B7LD1 VOLUME OF DETENTION = 0.76 ACRE-FT SPILLWAY ELEVATION = B71,D1 lOD YEAR ELEVATION IN SPILLWAY = 871.38 TOP OF BANK ELEVATION = 873.00 3:1 TRANSVERSE SLOPE ON SIDE SLOPF.S__,__, ,- 40LL &° SUR- 35 PVC f? i ISOLATIO / ~~' ~~ ~ ~- ,~ `' ~~~e ~/ 5a Ep O it ~ `~ J / Jf / J / / j ~ 7 7 / 7 / .k ~ I`/ 7 ~ __~7J #i/ ~~ j x / ~ ~ /~ / ~[~~ ~ ~~~ / - //. . . - 1J,ET 'JAL! LIF I' S1FT -DRY DEIEN110N / gAIER DUAUtt POND ND. 1 BOTTOM OE POND ELEVATION = 866.00 WATER QUALITY ELEVATION =661.25 8~ GATE V 10 YEAR STORY ELEVATON = 869.ffi - LOCATED 100 YEAR STOR11'ELEYARON- = 870.98 GFA95' I VOLUME OF DETENTION ='3.J0 ACRE-FT' SFiI1WAY ELEVATON =,070.96 . 12.8? E 100 YEAR ELEVATION W SPLLNAY = 871.36 iW OF BANK-F1fYAR(MI = 813,00 3:1 IRARSVEFSE AWE ON 90E SLOPES 22.5' 8 12' 20' BSL ~-- 7 ~/ ' %%%: L /~~~ .,~, ~ / ~ ~ I ~ I I i' ~ ~ ~'/ ~ ~ /~ \` I ~ ~ I ~ I i DRY DETENPON /WATER QUALITY POND N0. 2 ' ~~ BOTTOM OF POND ELEVATION = 667.50 ~ WATER OUALItt ELEVATION = B68.SD ~ 10 YEAR STORM ELEVATION = 869.30. ~ 100 YEAR.SiORM ELEVARON = 871.01 VOLUME OF DETENRON = 0.76 ACRE-Fi ' SPILLWAY ELEVATION = 871.01 ~ - 100 YEAR ELEVARON IN SPILLWAY = 871.38 TOP OF BANK ELEYATION = 873.00 I 3:1 TRANSVERSE SLOPE ON 9DE SLOPES IE 863.95 03 *~ s 0'15 '/S F~F.'fJ 8" SDR-35 PVC ®0. 79 BEND T+r i o 0 0 z d` ~ I i ~~ ~ ~ ~ X.,~ ~ m'~n-m•ti mw m^«-mw-m•w. 11 4 a // i ~ ~ ~ ~ ,, a w y9~p3 i ~\~~ ~ aa~~~~ya~6 ~ 1~" \\\1~~ ~" _ ~1~~ 11~~-\\\V~ "1~` ~ ~\ `' ~ \~ \\~~~\ m ~s\ \ ~t,~~~~ .6 \~ \\` 0~~~ ,~ ~l J/ i ~~ i _ ~_ ~ • ~~ s~ ~s \ ~,. . ~~o, ~uu NI11 wart / / END OF PIP _ ~ _ -._ - ~ - - _. - - - _ / C ~ S`F 22~91~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'f~''~Y Q V ~~ -. ~c~'" ~ ~ ~m.~'~ ~ ~ ~-~ _ .~ ' , ~ i ' ~ ~ ~ LOT 3b _ . ¢S,p,E ~ a ~ __ _ 1 fI / 1 ~ ~j~/iyNtlafiE <,:~IJK i"iGa - F:vpTV EPHiC \ \ ~ ~~ f~ / \' \.. /~ / /~`3 ~ ~' i i ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ J ~ ~ ~ LYNNE DRIVE / ~'~C / / ~' / /\ / '~ % / .VARIABLE BSL .''/ / // ~pRY DERNIION / WAIEit WAlIIY POND N0. S -, ~ , ~ / ~R04 a P0161 fLEYADON • 611.]6 ellreaRO slmPam f / ~ / / ~ wA¢A g1ALln EIEVAi¢e1 . m+.ao .... LOT 35 POLE6 (NO SICN) 9' / i /' 10 KAR 510.RN EUVAnIN! • 61SOY / / ~ / ~ / I00 YEAR 6/0AN REVA1Xx • 6M.66 . i - V0.0NE Or DE1EN-ON • I.&5 AO$-Fi Q~ / ~ ~' / ~ SPILLWAY fLf9A11DW • 816.fi6 _ , Y•/f , / i / LOP OF 6ANN EIEVA60N • 61900 ~' / ~ kl iRANSLfRA AOPE 011 s11E AOPE6 / / / S~ I (1o ec co6smucrzo x nc IunAx xcx nus AREA oExLO°s) -. / // ~ - i ~ NORTH MERIDIAN HEIGH >( " / P.B. 2, PAG 1 ~ I ~ ~ ~ I LOT 34 - i ~( iI LOT 33 I ,~S;v1 i Q~ I Y 4w Fqqm 1AU\~'bWm'YiLLx.A\f4At90~IF m e~/w/~M i~v ~ , , W ~ \ z~.- N ~ ~~_.~ maw ~ ~ --_ „~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ \ ° ~~\ mz0 ~ n ~~ ~ r i ~,~ ~ ~` "8~.4~~},.~ ~ VAA~ ~ v ~ ~ O z r ~~~n A ~ Z ~ ~ ~ \ `tp' - a ~ ~~ "`"~~ ~ v ~~~..:~~, 7C Own ~ ~ ~ 1 \ fN 1{y O ~~ ~ x~ ~~~~~~~ ~ ~`. \~"t ~ \ ~ W ~ ~~ rvb ~ ~ r ~ - ~~ F~ _ ~,~ ~ l ~~ ~:~AA ,/ ~' ~ 1 ~ ~~ cY~J _ ~b~--~. ~~~A ~ I ~ , ' ~ _- _ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ asp ~ / o ~ y, Z ~ ~ A ~ \ __._ ~ _ _ _ _ __ ___ .__ \ ~~ •~ '~~ \ 1. ._ -.._. - .,v _ ~ - - ~ ~ _~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ___- ~'~ I"~~ . a ~ \ ~ S?~~ ~ _ - _ _ _... _ _ _ . _ ~ ~ ~iS~ A ~~` ~ m rt~ z n 1 ~~ ~) Fe ® ~ -' ~ ~ ~ to ~~ _ i y e~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~~M ~ ~~ S \ ~f` \ ~ DO~ v~~ ~~ ~r ~ ` '~.9~~ ) pp ]. .~~ i n ~5~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "~ ~~bb'' O ~ 1 \ V' a ~ nn __ ~ -y~ _ ~ ~,{ ~ / _ ~ ~ ~- ~if~'94 ' I Z~ I ~~ ~ I '~ \ / _ y ~ ~ ~\ \ \ \ ~~ I I j ~ ~_ \\ ,~ roE ~ \ ~ \ °~~3 ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~~ ~ v ~ ~ - - ~~ Fa Fp ._ z ~~ ~ I \ / ~ %b ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~~ x ~ ~~ ~~ ~ / _~. ~% /~\ ~~ ~; \5:2~ ~~ _ ~~ I 1 ~ I F le ~1NKRlE CV~I ~ ~~y~~ /~ t //9 YATCILlE C4~ \~\~ IF ~ - ~ v~ ~~ ti ~ ~ -N~~, o . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9~ ~i ~ ~] ~ ,~ ~ _ _.-- `- i - ~ ~ \ ° ` "'." ~ ~ I ~ E ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ Gi ~ °~~ I ~~ ~ ~ O ~ S O . F F ~ ~ o Fn Ail ~lAµ ~ E ~SA ~'.. g p ~ ^~ 3~ _ '~ S I~~'I ~ \J~~1 I -- )y~ > ~ ~ ~"s ~o ~S ~ F G, _/~F "~ 4 I ~~ A (c) Ppm 1. cn pe.n~ { E S Y ~' i e i i ~ TREE PRESER9AT10N PLAN /~~ ~ ~ ( v o ( m F s ~ j~a:cxq~j ~ _ ~ ~( /'~ ~ SS5 ~ p ~i h~~i 1 y ~~ Af~~s ~ ~~~~"~fj`~~C~p~~~"~~~f~"~~`~~ p ~~~ ~39d9 PRIORIrv WAYSOOiX DRNESUrtE W] • MM' (fYINR lil \ r {{ '' ~~( ~ G ~ $ ~ INDIANAPOLIS. INOIAN/..6240 Fx[++F ( ~ 4 30 ~ 44 m E ~ ~ ' £d l ~ m8 ~' A' ~ r3anFr,~l~wc rlrar, rsrarr P.aa~rnlFas I~I,~a,4~,,,F,~~,,,~~.~. ~~ ~vFnxc p ¢ Q ~ `~ ~ ~ C 6100 W. 9EiH SIflEEi EMOi CnPe~cnpe bu pvx[fia[aetyw.~vs' 5 ~ ~ N ~ rvc 9 Fu. v10' I' INDIANAPOLIS. IN 462]A AFhhects. ErFylneen .. s>abpes~aeFm / b o - ~ -l ~ ~^~~saa~ zaal ti~, . - ~„ ~~ 3ro~~=~,_~x,L ~, „w~ 1,1,3-~,~, _ ~~,;3- e I 31 ls9 ,OZ ". ~ / N3n3sn ssnw-rvorv a ~ OS K9 91 IOB N1YA NXIYgSI .LI h N30 .S'ZZ / / / I ! (1 63dDA 306 Ip 3dO1S 350NSNYlM IY / CUT[0 = N]YYA311 Wf10 YJ dJl ` M ~ 94"1(8 • AYMTM N N'JLLYn313 M'3'. C01 Ix3nSt3 //p 331 .B~.ZI 06'0[8 • NglYA313 AYMTb$ // Y 30VNN8LL LLNtl llllll0 ~ /p tl 3KIY MT NJLLN313] }J 3M1(N / 'SS3693/59N9NI 310v18Yn ~{ V3Ml AYL`J B6U[B • N)YYn3l1 rypl5 MA WI / N m1Y.]Ol 9Z 698 • NJItYAP3 MMJIS bY3l OI / NNA 31M.1 ,0 SZ [9d = NJLLYA313 llITlIY1 NllYM / W998 = NUMYASp QNOd D n)11LL0 ,~~ ION ONb AIrtYfO YllYM / IpLLNll3LL A /~ " I ~~/ /~~ .a ;,, ~ ~ Doti Oi j LCBif OS S(A90913 .°~~ ~ ~~1 111 i~1 i i i iii•. I I` ~ SiL S ~ / Z08 ~~ ~~:. I ~ ~ ~^ a~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ / 3 ~,Z ~ ~¢~/~ ern, xle s6'u .9 ~ / W31 ~ ~ ~ ~~b° ~/ ~~ ~ / ~ i / ~ ^`~ / i 1 / ~ • ~ .. 5'LL I ~~ / ~IIM P131J / ~ / / ` ~/ ~_ 1S ~ ~ 13~Y SMOB~.LI ~~ ~@ ~ `3 X1 031YJ01/ 1~ (.~ ~ ~~ % -i .• ~ /3YTIA l1YY. ~ ~ / § ^+ / - ;L~ 1H3rvrv3 ~ ~" Y .. 31 . 1 - ~armw LLxY uI1110 / i y4 ' ~~~ssle~3/ss3~xl ?lenarn ~ ~',~yS° ~ p 3l ~ M ~ ~? j/ / --- - - ~_ - g~ ~D <L/ ~ ~ ~ / l ~// ' / a / (ti9 St S(A 91 ~ ., f08 ~ Y 6' 98 I s3do~ 3a¢ xo laox 3sMd+sN'm I c I ro'c<0 = xourn3n nxre n ml a K'I(8 = AYMTIdS NI N)YYA311 N'3l tUl J 10'l(0 • NAYA1l3 AYMIIA / V-303Y' 9[D • IUBNLI'I9 3YI11N / i. ~~A~ la ae - wurn313 nMOU Mri< aol ~, ~~~,n rc 690 - wuvn313 naoa am m M 8% = NOIIYA3l3 AIIIYNI tl31YM ~1 ~ / ~~ M [% = MIIYA313 RCd 30 11Jllt9 ~yfJ L Ox Ulpd Alfn'fA tlllYM / PoMNll30 Ab0 ~aPti~' ~~ I - 1 ~ /i I ~ 0 ~/ map ~' V QY / 6 d~~ `'(ago .i'i ~dS~-O~` LtP /' I _ ~ ' ~~~ / c~, j I ~~~ ~- - i _ ~~ 1150 ~ a6 I - ~~ ~ r i ~~~ _ - I / I ~ ,~~ I / _ :~'-- _, ~ i / -vTCF.1ATEJ) NrlF ~~~; _ i, `~. ` • • m • , • ~ ` • + • • ~ ~ •1 . l1.AT •f4lON l1 CHM WI'H ~ . .. !f~lTll ~ ELCyfF.R~ .. • + ' ' '!)ACKIfP UNOElTRN! INFI~.TRATION BASIN - PLAN VIEW `.lvT .~C SCr'~,CE SIIAt 4. "-dFIhNK~'N~ Mi'+TFAI~(k! PACKIW uNOEADAIN P~'E --'/ fYJiRE:-' ~ -.../l7[t41, w CASE Ot STANIlINf, Mrt'-SLEF C',NlAR/ WAT[N P$CA,t.E'IIS Qq GRRR gi/~PNRK',H INFILTRATION BASIN - PROFILE VIEW NC?T TC ~~f1~~ eta ,ie q ~'~e v 5 ~a~ S o ~ r~~L, 12~~~'~~ INFILTRATION BASIN -~ PHOTO `SOT "C SGA! E J L~`r------•r- ND SCALE TYPICAL RAIN GARIJEN ~ IRi~GLE~ PERSPECTIVE VI `1~ _„ :i~ A_t TYPICAL RAEN GAFZDEN - PHOTO