HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondenceEROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
TECHNICAL REVIEW AND COMMENT
Hamilton County Soil and Water Conservation District
1108 South 9"' Street, Noblesville IN 46060
Ph- 317-773-1432 or Email at
PROJECT NAME: Carmel City Center Parcel #2A ~®
SUBMITTED BY:
Carmel Redevelopment Commission Kosene and Kosene Mr.Lester Olds
One Civic Square 4495 Saguaro Trail CSO
Carmel, IN 46032 Indianapolis, IN 46268 280 E. 96t~ Street, Suite 200
317- 571-2417 Indianapolis, IN 46240
Y° ~]
REVIEWED BY: John B. South P.E. ~~~~ t
Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control
PLAN REVIEW DATE: November 10, 2003 Acreage: Approx. 3 as ~~
LOCATION: West side of Rangeline Road, north of Gradle Drive ~~ ~_ tj3 Q P ~~-~
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sec. 36
TOWNSHIP: 18N RANGE: 3E CIVIL TOWNSHIP: Clay
SOIL SURVEY MAP SHEET: 50
The technical review and comments are intended to evaluate the completeness of the erosion and sediment control plan fbr the
project. The erosion and sediment control plan submitted was not reviewed for the adequacy of the engineering design. All
practices included in the plan, as well as those recommended in the comments should be evaluated as to their feasibility by a
qual fed individual with structural practices designed by a qua[ifted engineer. The plan has not been reviewed for local, state,
or federal permits that may he required to proceed with this project. Additional information, including design calculations may
be requested to further evaluate the erosion and sediment control plan.
The erosion and sediment control plan has been reviewed and it has been determined that the plan:
Satisfies the minimum requirements and intent of 327IAC 15-5 (Rule 5). Notification will be Torwarded to the
Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
Refer to the comments section Tor additional information.
X Does not satisfy the minimum requirements and intent of 327IAC 75-5 (Rule 5); deficiencies are noted in the
checklist and in the comments section. Deficiencies constitute potential violations of the rule and must be
adequately addressed for compliance. The information necessary to satisfy the deficiencies must be submitted:
Proper implementation of the erosion and sediment control plan and inspections of the construction site by the developer or a
representative are necessary to minimize off-site sedimentation. The developer should be aware that unforeseen construction
activities and weather conditions might affect the performance of a practice or the erosion and sediment control plan. The plan
must be a flexible document, with provisions to modify or substitute practices as necessary.
•
•
PROJECT: Carr nel City C
er Parcel #2A
Page 2 of 3
ARE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED ON THE PLANS ?
(All Plaas Must /nc[ude Appropriate Legends, Scales, and Nortlr Arrow)
([terns that are Not Applicable to tleis Project are designated by NA)
Yes No PROJECT INFORMATION
X lA Project Location Map (Show project in relation to other areas of the county)
X 1 B Narrative Describing the Nature and Purpose of the Project
X 1C Location of Planned and/or Existing Roads, Utilities, Structures, Highways, etc.
X 1D Lot and/or Building Locations
X tE Landuse of Adjacent Areas
(Show the Entire Upstream Watershed and Adjacent Areas Within 500 Feet of the Property [.fines)
Yes No TOPOGRAPHIC, DRAINAGE, AND GENERAL SITE FEATURES
X 2A Existing Vegetation (Identify and Delineate )
x 2B Location and Name of All Wetlands, Lakes and Water Courses On and Adjacent to the Site
X 2C 100 Year Floodplains, Floodway Fringes, and Floodways (Note ijNone)
x 2D Soils Information (ljhydric soils are present, it is the responsibility ojthe owner/developer ro
investigate the existence ojwet[ands and to obtain permits from the appropriate government agencies.)
x 2E Existing and Planned Contours at an Interval Appropriate to Indicate Drainage Patterns
X 2F Locations of Specific Points Where Stormwater Discharge Will Leave the Site
X 2G Identify All Receiving Waters (7jDischarge is [o a Separate Municipal Storm Sewer, [den[ify the
Name of [he Municipal Operator and the U[[imare Receiving Water)
X 2H Potential Areas Where Storm water May Enter Groundwater (Note ijNone)
X 2I Location of Stormwater System (Include Culverts, Storm Sewers, Channels, and Swa[es)
Yes No LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES
x 3A Location and Approximate Dimensions of All Disturbed Areas [i. e.. Construction Limits]
(Areas Where Vegetative Cover Will De Pre-served Should be Clearly Designated)
x 3B Soil Stockpiles and or Borrow Areas (Show Locottons or Note if None)
Yes No EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES
x 4A Sequence of When Each Measure Will Be Implemented (Relative to Earth Disturbing Activities)
x 4B Monitoring and Maintenance Guidelines for Each Measure
X 4C Perimeter Sediment Control Measures (Location. Construction Uetail, Dimensions, and Specifications)
X 4D Temporary Seeding (Specifications; lnchrding Seed Mix, Fertilizer, Lime, and Mulch Rates)
x 4E Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Measures
(Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications)
x 4F Permanent Erosion and Sediment Control Measures
(Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifrcations)
x 4G Storm Drain Inlet Protection (Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications)
Il~& 4H Stormwater Outlet Protection (Location, Construction Uetail, Dimensions, and Specifications)
X 41 Stable Construction Entrance (Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifcations)
x 4J Erosion and Sediment Control on Individual Building Lots (Specifcations)
X 4K Permanent Seeding (Specifica[ions,~ Including Seed Mix, Fertilizer, Lime, and Mulch Rates)
Revised 4 / 97
ER • ON AND SEDIMENT CONTR• PLAN
TECHNICAL REVIEW
COMMENTS
PROJECT: Carmel City Center Parcel #5 (Shapiro's Phase II)
Page 3 of 3
Note: A[l erosion and sediment control measures s/Town on tpe plans and referenced in tkis review must meet the design
criteria, standards, and specifications outlined in the "/ndiana Handbook for Erosion Cmztro[ in Developing Areas" from tqe
!ndiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Snil Conservation or similar Guidance Documents.
4G. Show protection for the existing culverts at the south-east corner of the site.
4G. Silt fabric under casting is not an approved practice. Please remove the note on the plans. The Dandy
Bag II detail should only be used.
4J. Erosion and sediment control instructions/expectations are needed for building construction. Silt fence or
other perimeter practice is needed around each building site.
Note: IDEM will be notified when the plan is approved.
Cc: Carmel DOCS
Ha. Co. Surveyor
File
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
TECHNICAL REVIEW AND COMMENT
Hamilton County Soil and Water Conservation District
1108 South 9th Street, Noblesville IN 46060
Ph- 317-773-1432 or Email at iohn-south a(~iaswcd.orsr
PROJECT NAME: ,Carmel City-Genter3ParceL#Sr(Shaptro~`s~"Pha e Ih)~,' ~ ~
SUBMITTED BY: Carmel Redevelopment Commission Mr. Kevin Sellars 1 O~ ~ O ~/
One Civic Square CSO
Carmel, IN 46032 280 E. 96~' Street, Suite 200 ~~/~
317- 571-2417 r Indianapolis, IN 46240 ~
REVIEWED BY: John B. South P.E.
Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control
PLAN REVIEW DATE: October 21, 2003 Acreage: Approx. 3 ac.
LOCATION: West side of Rangeline Road, north of Gradle Drive
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sec. 36
TOWNSHIP: 18N RANGE: 3E CIVIL TOWNSHIP: Clay
SOIL SURVEY MAP SHEET: 50
The technical review and comments are intended to evaluate the completeness of the erosion and sediment control plan for the
The erosion and sediment control plan submitted was not reviewed for the adequacy of the engineering design. Ald
included in the plan, as well as those recommended in the comments should be evaluated as to their feasibility by a
qualified individual with structural practices designed by a qualified engineer. The plan has not been reviewed for local, state,
or federal permits that may be required to proceed with this project. Additional information, including design calculations may
be requested to further evaluate the erosion and sediment control plan.
The erosion and sediment control plan has been reviewed and it has been determined that the plan:
X Satisfies the minimum requirements and intent of 3271AC 15-5 (Rule ~. Notification will be forwarded to the
Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
X Refer to the comments section for additional information.
Proper Implementation of the erosion and sediment control plan and inspections of the construction site by the developer or a
representative are necessary to minimize off-site sedimentation. The developer should be aware that unforeseen construction
activities and weather conditions might affect the performance of a practice or the erosion and sediment control plan. The plan
must be a flexible document, with provisions to modify or substitute practices as necessary.
xe~~sed a t 9~
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
TECHNICAL REVIEW
COMMENTS
PROJECT: Carmel City Center Parcel #5 (Shapiro's Phase II)
Page 2 of 2
Note: fill erosion and sediment contra[ measures shown an the plans and referenced in this review must meet the design
criteria, standards, and specifications outlined in the "Grdiana Har:dbook jar Erasion Control in Developing Areas" from Nie
/ndiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Sail Conservation or similar Guidance Documents.
Recommendations
Detail 09 needs changes. Based on the proposed levee height and upper invert, there is 3.2' of stage. The top
of the perforated riser should be 1' below the levee. This would make a riser height of 2.2'. Inaddition, show
a cone of #8 stone around the riser to provide additional filtering. Label and dimension the concrete base.
Label the size of the outlet pipe.
Please revise construction sequence:
1. ok
2. ok
3. Enlarge dry basin and install DBP. Complete rough grading for the remainder of the site. Areas
shown to be protected with erosion control blanket will be final graded, seeded and protected with
the erosion control blanket.
4. Install stone lay down area for building construction and parking. Start building construction.
5. ok
6. ok
7. Install inlet protection as each inlet becomes functional
8. delete
9. Complete building construction
10. ok
11. delete
12. ok
13. ok
Cc: Carmel DOCS
Ha. Co. Surveyor
File
f l
Lily, Laurence M
From: Brewer, Scott I
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 7:24 PM ---
To: Lillig, Laurence M
Cc: 'Chris McComas'
Subject: Shapiro's Phase II Revision C
Laurence: I
I recieved revisied copies of Shapiro's plans on Sept-lflth-My only co ment that was not addressed was the tree
planting detail. It still says "PLACE SOIL BALL, ROOT FLARE, OR ROOT CROWN SLIGHTLY HIGHER THAN
EXISTING GRADE, MOUND SOIL OVER BALL.
Planting a tree too deeply is problem that we see regularly. It stresses most trees, leading to their decline and eventual
death. Connected to this problem is the fact that most trees come from nurseries with the root flare (area where the trunk
tissue becomes root tissue as the tree expands it's taper at it's base) already too deep in the soil ball that gets transported
with the balled and burlapped tree. If we see that the root flare is exposed and planted at the correct height (grade level)
then we can insure that the tree has achance to survive. If we plant the soil ball that the tree comes in from the nursery at
grade level, and the root flare is already too deep (sometimes 4"-6"), and the tree will begin to decline.
The note should say PLACE ROOT FLARE OR ROOT CROWN AT, OR SLIGHTLY HIGHER THAN EXISTING GRADE.
That was the only issue that has not been ressolved.
Scott Brewer
Urban Forester, City of Carmel
Department of Community Services
One Civic Square
Carmel, IN 46032
(317)571-2478
Page 1 of 1
/1
Babbitt, Pamela A
1~
From: Hollibaugh, Mike P , ®d °"~ ,
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 3:21 PM ~ ~ ~ _ryt~ l!(
To: Lillig, Laurence M Y
Cc: Babbitt, Pamela A
Subject: FW: Shapiro's
LL
don't we typically send out a letter of grant for these too? is this something pam can help us with?
mike ! D~ ~/~ Y
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris McComas [mailto:cmccomas@advocati.us] /~'
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 9:01 PM ! ~ ,
To: mhollibaugh@ci.carmel.in.us
Subject: Shapiro's ~~~~ZF -
Mike,
Our tenant ~Flagstar~ has requested that we obtain copies of your approvals for the ADLS and zoning for the site.
Is this something you can e-mail, such as meeting minutes or do I need to stop by. Let me know.
Thanks for your help.
Chris McComas, NCARB, CSI, CCS
Advocati, LLC
SI40 Nonh Park Ave.
.Indianapolis, IN 46205
(3I7) 430-3504
cmcconras UJadvocati.us
-~~-----------,r-~J
V V/
a
~ n
~~~"1'~0~0~
9/10/2003
September 9, 2003
~~~~
Mr. Kevin Sellers
CSO
280 E. 96th Street, Suite 200
Indianapolis, IN 46240
RE: Project NO: 22546
Shapiro's Phase 2
Dear Mr. Sellers:
a
~' CFiVFD
SEP 10 20if3
DuCS ~%
`.
1,
I have received and reviewed the plans submitted for the above-mentioned
project. I see nothing in the plans that would hamper law enforcement efforts.
If we can be of any further assistance to you, please contact us.
Respectfully,
~Z~~r,~a~P-D.
Michael D. Fogarty`
Chief of Police
MDF:vb
cc: Dept. of Community Services
(317) 57It-250rD
,~:~ .~y~
,,. _,
~ ~`~,
w~ r'';
A Nationally Accredit ' ?~~v~;.~ 'forcement Agency
m
Fes(3g7Db71-E512
s~
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
TECHNICAL REVIEW AND COMMENT
Hamilton County Soil and Water Conservation District
1108 South 9`h Street, Noblesville IN 46060
Ph- 317-773-1432 or Email at iohn-south aniaswcd.ore
PROJECT NAME: Car "gel Ci ~ eiite ~_arcel #SS,apir~~o,:'s'P~has~eapII) 1 On 0 2 ~ P~ `'~
SUBMITTED BY: Carmel Redevelopment Commission Mr. Bob Olson ` "1 > N'v
One Civic Square CSO
Carmel, IN 46032 280 E. 96t" Street, Suite 200
317- 571-2417 Indianapolis, IN 46240
REVIEWED BY: John B. South P.E.
' Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control
PLAN REVIEW DATE: September 8, 2003 Acreage: Approx. 3 ac.
LOCATION: West side of Rangeline Road, north of Gradle Drive
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sec. 36
TOWNSHIP: 18N RANGE: 3E CIVIL TOWNSHIP: Clay
SOIL SURVEY MAP SHEET: 50
The technical review and continents are intended to evaluate the completeness of the erosion and sediment control plan far the
project. The erosion and sediment control plan submitted was not reviewed for the adequacy of the engineering design. All
practices included in the plan, as well as those recommended in the comments should be evaluated as to their feasibility by a
qualified individual with structural practices designed by a qualified engineer. The plan has not been reviewed for local, state,
or federal permits that may be required to proceed with this project. Additional information, including design calculations may
6e requested to further evaluate the erosion and sediment control plan.
The erosion and sediment control plan has been reviewed and it has been determined that the plan:
X Satisfies the minimum requirements and intent of 3271AC 15-5 (Rule 5). Notification will be forwarded to the
Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
X Refer to the comments section for additional information.
Proper implementation of the erosion and sediment control plan and inspections of the construction .rite by the developer or a
representative are necessary to minimize off-site sedimentation. The developer should be aware that unforeseen constn{etion
activities and weather conditions might affect the performance of a practice or the erosion and sediment control plan. The plan
must be a flexible document, with provisions to mods or substitute practices as necessary.
Revised 4 / 97
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
TECHNICAL REVIEW
COMMENTS
PROJECT: Carmel City Center Parcel #5 (Shapiro's Phase II)
Page 2 of 2
Note: A[l erosion and sediment control measures shown on the plans and referenced in tkis review must mee! the design
criteria, standards, and specifications outlined in the "/ndianu Handbook for Erasion Control in Developing Areas "from the
/ndiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Soi[ Conservation or similar Guidance Dacuments.
Recommendations
Inlet protection is needed for the existing dry basin pipe outlet. The protection needs to be reinstalled when
the basin is regarded or require the basin be regarded first and outlet protected. A slotted riser or stone
horseshoe dam is recommended practice for the basin outlet. The silt fence is not adequate.
Consider inlet protection for paved areas. (gravel bags)
On the construction sequence, please include the information about the dry basin inlet protection. Also
include stone base for building construction after rough grading.
Note: IDEM will be notified when the plan is approved.
Cc: Carmel DOCS
Ha. Co. Surveyor
IDEM
File
Catalog Number
e'
12~132T8_~,1 Lamp, 32 watt T8, Electronic Ballast.
RF ~,~g~ OG3
pUG ~pGS
NS
P
Housing Construction: Heavy gauge extruded
aluminum housing and lens retainer. Die cast end caps
mounted to body with four, stainlesssteel fasteners.
Lens: High impact dear polycarbonate. Fully sealed
and gasketed against weather, dust, and insects
Ballast: All ballasts are Electronic 120, 277, or 347
volt ballasts are available.
Lamp Holderand Lamp: Bi-Pin T8 Lamp holder.
Fixture requi2s one, 32 watt T8 lamp (lamp by others).
Swivel: Heavyduty die cast construction. Mounted to
housing with internal stainlesssteel fasteners. Provided
with ahalf-inch NPT nipple formounling tojundion box
(box by others).
Reflector: Predsionfotmed from highly specular
aluminum. Flood and Wall wash distributionsare
available.
Finish: Polyurethane powderpaint
Listing: U.L. / C.U.L. Wet Location Listed
ORDERINGINFORMATION Choosethe one bddface opli onfor each ofthe categories. you do not neetltoch nose an
OPTION. Example 72-132TSSB-A-F-U
l2-(3218- M~ 18 - ~ - ~ - `^~ - U -
FIXTURE MOUNTING FINISH VOLTPGE REFLECTOR PINING OPTIONS
12-13278 S-Sxivet(Standard). B-&ackPaint A-120vdt, W-Wall wash
LB-"L"Braclais. Z-Bronze Pairrt ~~~ Reflector
12-13278 EM-Ertl vririrg KO's G-Green Paint B-277w1t, F-Flood
(Svri~MOU~ted). N-Mist Green ~~~ Refleaor
SP-Sq le MOUnt (on Paint C-347w1t.
svri gels .
M -Metallic Paint ~ ~~
S -Industrial
MA4-cinch Silver Paint
Mounting Arm. W _ WNte Paint
MA70-t0 inch C-Custom Ca or
Mourdirg Arm Paint
MA_ -Mounting
Arm(rp to 36 inches
long, Specfy Length).
MAA_ -Angled
Moutbng Arm (upto
36 inches I ong. Specify
Length).
U -Up GS - Exernal GI are
D - Dovm Shield
EL-External
Vertical LWVerS
IL-Internal Louver
CFLR-Red Lera
CFLB - Blue Leis
CFLY - yellow Lere
CFLG - Green Leis
CFLR - ArrOer Lens
CFLC -Custom
Cdor Lens
Type
ORGATECH+OMEGALUX 511 N. VirginiaAve,AZUSa,CA91702 call(626)969f820 fax(626)969-6830 orgatechomegalux.com
-.
Specifed over and over by the most
renown lighting designers and
architects in North America.
Using the latest energy efficient lamps
with engineered reflectors Omegalux
makes the most effective use of Fluorescent
light Fixtures can be spaced or
interconnected in all lengths, with single
or multiple tamping. The compact solid
aluminum body ensures high thermal
conductivity, for tlissipating radiant summer
heat, protecting electronic ballasts against
breakdown, and ensure rapid warm up of
the lamps in cold weather. Minus 5° F
high quality electronic ballasts are standard
for lamps over 13W, 120/277V.
Omegalux can be adapted to meet almost
any application, using louvers, colored
flier lenses, and special mounfing hardware.
O m e g_a_I ux
Outdoor Fluorescent Floodlights
• Small profile -high output.
• Unique sealing and breathing for a permanently clean lens interior.
• Zero maintenance between lampings.
• Virtually indestructable.
ORGATECH OMEGALUX
511 N. Virginia Ave, Azusa Ca. 91702 tel: 626.969.6820 Toll free: 877.841 •6569 fax: 626.969.6830
Internet: orgatechomegaluz.com
30
Vc
2.4"
6/03
ARer 6 Years at sprinkler level without
maintenance, the lens and reflector display
no image deterioration.
Hughes Center, Los Angeles, Ca.
26W Omegalux illuminate parapet recesses.
Lighting Design: Chip Israel - LDA
Corporate Headquarters • •
~~ 280 E. 96th Street, Suite 200
T 317.848.7800 dF 317.574 0957 .
C $ Q www.cso-arch.com
TO: Planning and zoning
One Civic Square
Carmel, IN 46032
ATTN: Laurence Lillig
CONTACT PHONE: 571-2441
WE ARE SENDING YOU:
DATE: 08-29-03
PROJECT NO; 22546
RE: Shapiro's Phase 2
~~~~.~;~
~i-CFIVED ~~~"~
,~, 2s 2063
~.~u
~d~s
i
,COPIES ~. ~*~~';DATE~F`~'~`~-~
~ w_ .'~~.~;~.;~.,~~'-~--.mDESCRIPTIONx. ~,".",;~
s~ 1 '~ r_~~"~°fi
1 08-29-03 Set of Civil Documents
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED:
^ For approval
® For your use
® As requested
^ For review and comment
REMARKS:
CC: FILE- 22546
BOB OLSON
^ Reviewed as submitted ^ Resubmit for approval
^ As noted ^ Submit for distribution
^ Revise and Resubmit ^ Return corrected prints
^ Rejected ^ Other:
By: Kevin Sellers
^ 1-HR Courier ^ 3-HR Courier ^ Fed-Ex 8:30 A.M. Delivery ^ Fed-Ex 10:30 A. M. Delivery
^ Fed-Ex Saturday Delivery ^ Fed-Ex 3:00 P.M. Delivery ®Hand Delivered
IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS INDICATED, PLEASE NOTIFY US AT ONCE.
^ Fed-Ex Ground
LOT LILLIG 08-29-03.doc
~I
~~ Corporate Headquarters
280 E. 96th Street, Suite 200
T 317.848.7800 dF 317.574 0957
C $ Q www.cso-arch.com
TO: Carmel Deparment of Community
Services
One Civic Square
Carmel, IN. 46032
ATTN: DOCS
CONTACT PHONE: 571-2417
WE ARE SENDING YOU:
DATE: 08-29-03
PROJECT NO: 22546
RE: Shapiro's Phase 2
~~COPIES~~:
.~~,,.3~DATE.~. ~3
~
~~ ~~ ~~ ~ x .~ ~ ~ ~ -~ =®~~
s.,~.~-_ . n%,`~`;DESCRIP~TION.,.,'..sk, ;., .;mow ._.
,
2 08-29-03 Set of Construction Documents
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED:
^ For approval
® For your use
® As requested
^ For review and comment
REMARKS:
^ Reviewed as submitted ^ Resubmit for approval
^ As noted ^ Submit for distribution
^ Revise and Resubmit ^ Return corrected prints
^ Rejected ^ Other:
S'' u~' 3 ~2G"3 ~ `r,
i~
~,,~ DGCS
~.
CC: 22546
BOB OLSON
By: Kevin Sellers
^ 1-HR Courier ^ 3-HR Courier ^ Fed-Ex 8:30 A.M. Delivery ^ Fed-Ex 10:30 A. M. Delivery
^ Fed-Ex Saturday Delivery ^ Fed-Ex 3:00 P.M. Delivery ®Hand Delivered
IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS INDICATED, PLEASE NOTIFY US AT ONCE.
LOT 08-29-03 DOCHS.doc
^ Fed-Ex Ground
Corporate Headquarters
~~ 260 E. 96th Street, Suite 200
~ •~ Indianapolis, Indiana 46240 .
T 317.648.7800 F 317.574.0957
C $ Q www.cswarch,com
TO: City of Carmel, DOCS Office
One Civic Square
Carmel, Indiana 46032
ATTN: Lawrence Lillig _ -/
CONTACT PHONE: 571-2~7
WE ARE SENDING
DATE: August 22, 2003
PROJECT NO: 22546C ~~ 5J! 1 ~
RE: Shapiro's_ Phase~ll ~ ~y'
0
-03 ~~~ ~~ ~' > ~ ~~~ o ~s
~~~ ~~.
1 ~ ~ Set of construction drawings for review. ~
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED:
® For approval
® For your use
^ As requested
^ For review and comment
REMARKS:
CC: FILE
LES OLDS
^ Reviewed as submitted ^ Resubmit for approval
^ As noted ^ Submit for distdbution
^ Revise and Resubmit ^ Retum corrected prints
^ Rejected ^ Other:
By: Kevin Sellers
^ 1-HR Courier ^ 3-HR Courier ^ Fed-Ex 6:30 A.M. Delivery ^ Fed-Ex 10:30 A.M. Delivery
^ Fed-Ex Saturday Delivery ^ Fed-Ex 3:00 P.M. Delivery ®Hand Delivery
IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS INDICATED, PLEASE NOTIFY US AT ONCE.
Document2
^ Fed-Ex Ground
Cwporate XeadquaRers •
a 280 E. 96th Street, Suite 200
Indianapolis, Indiana 46240
T 317.848.7800 F 317.574.0957
Cj S Q www.csoarch.com
TO: City of Carmel, DOCS Office
One Civic Square
Carmel, Indiana 46032
ATTN: Lawrence Lillig
CONTACT PHONE: 571-2417
WE ARE SENDING YOU:
,~.,.,COI?IES-:' ;a-.ate, ,DP;TE ' :-i. °~` `=` `` "DESCRIPTION -~< "^}
1 Architectural Plans
1 Structural Plans
DATE: August 19, 2003
PROJECT NO: 22546C
RE: Shapiro's Phase II
•
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED:
^ For approval
® For your use
^ As requested
^ For review and comment
^ Reviewed as submitted
^ As noted
^ Revise and Resubmit
^ Rejected
^ Resubmit for approval
^ Submit for distribution
^ Return corrected prints
^ Other:
REMARKS:
Lawrence: Attached please find a copy of the Architectural and Structural plans for the Shapiro's
Phase II project. The Site/Landscape plans will be submitted to you on Friday. Late minute changes to
the site/landscape plans has delayed the complete of these plans therefore the civil plans will be
delivered to your office on Friday of the week. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me
at your convenience. Thank you, Bob
CC: FILE
LES OLDS
By: Bob Olson
^ 1-HR Courier ^ 3-HR Courier ^ Fed-Ex 8:30 A. M. Delivery ^ Fed-Ex 10:30 A.M. Delivery ^ Fed-Ex Ground
^ Fed-Ex Saturday Delivery ^ Fed-Ex 3:00 P. M. Delivery ®Hand Delivery
IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS INDICATED, PLEASE NOTIFY US AT ONCE.
Document2
:Lillig, Laurence M
From: publicnotices@indystar.com
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 3:14 PM
To: Lillig, Laurence M
Subject: Re: Notice of Plan Commiss
Center, Tract 10 - Shapiy@'
~ ~G ~FC~`f'~
G
CeOte Otract l~. ~ O~c'TB~~O
Received and all clear to pub lx on 8
Thank you.
Carol M.
No. 109-03 DP/AD@$; Car
"Lillig, Laurence M" <LLillig@ci.carmel.in.us> on 08/15/2003 03:01:14 PM
To: "'PublicNOtices@Indystar.com "' <PUblicNOtices@Indystar.com>
cc: "Hollibaugh, Mike P" <MHOllibaugh@ci.carmel.in.us>, "DObosiewicz,
Jon C" <JDObosiewicz@ci.carme L in.us>, "Butler, Angelina V"
<ABUtler@ci.carmel.in.us>, "Hancock, Ramona B"
<RHancock@ci.carmel.in.us>
Subject: Notice of Plan Commission Hearing: Docket No. 109-03 DP/ADLS;
Car mel City Center, Tract 10 - Shapiro's, Phase II
Carol,
Please publish on either Monday, August 18, or Tuesday, August 19, 2003, in
the Indianapolis Star.
Attached is the notice for public hearing before the Carmel/Clay Advisory
Plan Commission for Docket No. 109-03 DP/ADCs:
«2003-0829 City Center, tract 10 Commission Notice.rtf »
Please call or e-mail me if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Laurence M. Lillig, Jr.
Planning & Zoning Administrator
Division of Planning & Zoning
Department of Community Services
City of Carmel
One Civic Square
Carmel, IN 46032
317/571-2417
fax: 317/571-2426
llillig@ci.carmel.in.us
mel City
1
;(See attached file: 2003-OS~City Center, tract 10 Commissio Notice.rtf)
*** eSafe has scanned this email for malicious content and found it to be clean ***
*** IMPORTANT: Do not open attachments from unrecognized senders ***
2
/DEPARTMENT ORCOMMUNITY SERVICES
~~ ~ ~~
July 16, 2003 ~ ~~ ~~G~\60 ~'~ ~~'"~
~:.-
Bob Olson ~^ , ~~~ O~GS r
CSO ~~ ~ ,
280 E. 96`h Street, Suite 200 ~C
Indianapolis, IN 46240 `~(-_",
RE: Shapiro's Phase II landscape plan review
Dear Bob:
This letter is to provide comments for the July 16, 2003, TAC meeting for the landscape
plans submitted for the above site. The plan should equal the design elements and
materials built with Phase I. My comments area as follows:
1. The landscaping and street tree plantings along Veteran's Way and Monon
Green Drive should match the landscaping currently existing in Phase I
(Shapiro's Restaurant and pazking lot). Trees and other plant materials should
be added to the plan to reflect the complete design.
2. The species of plant materials must be specified on the landscape plan, and a
plant schedule provided. A plant schedule normally provides information
such as common plant name, scientific name, type of planting stock, installed
size of stock, etc.
3. No foundation or building landscaping is shown on the plans. Such
landscaping should match the design of the existing Shapiro's building from
Phase I, and needs to be shown on the plan and plant schedule.
4. The design of the street planters must match the existing planters in front of
the Phase I building, included the removed block in the below ground portion
of the planters, and the constructed soils under the sidewalk (see planter detail
21/C100). The species of plant material in the planters needs to be specified
and shown on the plans.
5. An additional planting note should be added which states that any stakes and
guy wires used to plant trees must be removed within one year.
6. The graphic tree planting detail (03-C700) note that specifies that the soil ball
must be placed higher than existing grade needs to specify that the "root Haze"
or "root crown" must be placed slightly high than existing grade.
ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571.2417
Page 2, Shapiro's Phase 2
Please reply to these comments in writing and by amended plans. Please contact me
to discuss questions or further comments at (317) 571-2478 or by email at
5brewer .ci.carmel.in:us.
Sincerely,
~~--/~
Scott Brewer, Urban Forester
Department of Community Services
CC: Jon Dobosiewicz, DOCS
Steve Engelking, City of Carmel
Les Olds, CSO
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
TECHNICAL REVIEW AND COMMENT ~ -- ~~
` Hamilton County Soil and Water Conservation District
1108 South 9`h Street, Noblesville IN 46060
Ph- 317-773-1432 or Email at john-southna,iaswcd.or>; "f~ ~~~~%j~
PROJECT NAME: Carmel City Center Parcel #5 (Shapiro's Phase II) OC~'d' ~~1~ /
SUBMITTED BY: Carmel Redevelopment Commission Mr. Bob Olson
One Civic Square CSO
Carmel, IN 46032 280 E. 96`~ Street, Suite 200
317- 571-2417 Indianapolis, IN X46240
REVIEWED BY: John B. South P.E.
Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control
PLAN REVIEW DATE: July 15, 2003 Acreage: Approx. 3 ac.
LOCATION: West side of Rangeline Road, north of Gradle Drive
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sea 36
TOWNSHIP: 18N RANGE: 3E CIVIL TOWNSHIP: Clay
SOIL SURVEY MAP SHEET: _ 50,_ _ _ _ ... ... .
The technical review and comments are intended to evaluate the completeness of [he erosion and sediment control plan for the
project. The erosion and sediment control plan submitted was not reviewed for the adequacy of the engineering design. All
practices included in the p/an, as well as those recommended in the comments should be evaluated as to their feasibility by a
qualified individual with structural practices designed 6y a qualified engineer. The plan has not been reviewed for local, state,
or federal permits that may be required to proceed with this project. Additional information, including design calculations may
be requested to further evaluate the erosion and sediment control plan.
The erosion and sediment control plan has been reviewed and it has been determined that the plan:
Satisfies the minimum requirements and intent of 3271AC 15-5 (Rule 5). Notification will be forwarded to ihe~
Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
Refer to the comments section for additional information.
X Does not satisfy the minimum requirements and intent of 3271AC 15-5 (Rule 5); deficiencies are noted in the
checklist and in the comments section. Deficiencies constitute potential violations of the rule and must be
adequately addressed for compliance. The information necessaryto satisfy the deficiencies must be submitted:
Proper implementation of the erosion and sediment control plan and inspections of the construction site by the developer or a
representative are necessary to minimize off-site sedimentation. The developer should be aware that unforeseen construction
activities and weather conditions might affect the performance of a practice or the erosion and sediment control plan. The plan
must be a flexible document, with provisions to modify or substitute practices as necessary.
Revised 4 / 97
PROJECT: Carmel City Center Parcel #5 (Shapiro's Phase II)
Page 2 of 3
Yes No
X
x
x
x
x
ARE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED ON THE PLANS ?
(All Plans Mnst /nclude Appropriate Legends, Scales, and North Arrow)
(Items tlmt are Not Applicable to thtis Project are designated by NA)
PROJECT INFORMATION
lA Project Location Map (Show project in relation to other areas of the county)
1 B Narrative Describing the Nature and Purpose of the Project
1C Location of Planned and/or Existing Roads, Utilities, Structures, Highways, etc.
lD Lot and/or Building Locations
1 E Landuse of Adjacent Areas
(Show the Entire Upstream Watershed and Adjacent Areas Within 500 Feet of the Property /,fines)
Yes No
X
x
X
X
x
x
X
x
X
Yes No
X
x
Yes No
x
x
X
X
x
x
X
X
X
N/A
X
TOPOGRAPHIC, DRAINAGE, AND GENERAL SITE FEATURES
2A Existing Vegetation (Identify and Delineate )
2B Location and Name of All Wetlands, Lakes and Water Courses On and Adjacent to the Site
2C 100 Year Floodplains, Floodway Fringes, and Floodways (Note if None)
2D Soils Information ([f hydric soils are present, it is the responsibility of the owner/developer [o
investigate the exislence of wetlands and to obtain permits from the appropriate government agencies.)
2E Existing and Planned Contours at an Interval Appropriate to Indicate Drainage Patterns
2F Locations of Specific Points Where Stormwater Discharge Will Leave the Site
2G Identify All Receiving Waters (lfDischarge is to a Separate Municipa! Storm Sewer, Identify the
Name of [he Municipal Operator and the Ultimate Receiving Water)
2H Potential Areas Where Storm water May Enter Groundwater (Note if None)
2I Location of Stormwater System (!nclude Culverts, Storm Sewers, Channels, and Swoles)
LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES
3A Location and Approximate Dimensions of All Disturbed Areas [i. e., Construction /.units]
(Areas Where Vegetative Cover Will Be Preserved Should be Clearly Designate
3B Soil Stockpiles and or Borrow Areas (Show Locations or Nore if None)
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES
4A Sequence of When Each Measure Will Be Implemented (Relative to Earth Disrurbtng Activities)
4B Monitoring and Maintenance Guidelines for Each Measure
4C Perimeter Sediment Control Measures (Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications)
4D Temporary Seeding (Specifications: Including Seed Mix, Fertilizer, Lime, and Mulch Rates)
4E Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Measures
(Location, Consd~uction Detail, Dineenstons, and Specifrcations)
4F Permanent Erosion and Sediment Control Measures
(Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications)
4G Storm Drain Inlet Protection (Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications)
4H Stormwater Outlet Protection (Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications)
41 Stable Construction Entrance (Location, Construction Derai/, Dimensions, and Specifications)
AJ Erosion and Sediment Control on Individual Building Lots (Specifications)
4K Permanent Seeding (Specifications; Including Seed Mix, Fertilizer, Lime, and Mulch Rates)
Revised 4 / 97
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
TECI-INICAL REVIEW
COMMENTS
PROJECT: Carmel City Center Parcel #5 (Shapiro's Phase II)
Page 3 of 3
Note: A(1 erosion and sediment control measures shown on the plans and referenced in this review must meet the design
criteria, standards, and specifrcations outlined in tlee "Indiana Handbook for Erosion Contra[ in Developing Areas"from [he
Indiana Department ojNatural Resources, Division of Sail Conservation or similar Guidance Documents.
Address items in sections 1, 2, and 3.
4A & C Please include inlet protection for the existing outlet for the detent_i_on basin. Installation should be
included in line #1 in the sequence.
4K. A permanent seeding spec. is needed.
All land disturbing activities that exceed 5 acres or are part of a larger common plan of land
development need an erosion control plan. There are sites within the Carmel Civic Center that are
operating without a permit. Please submit erosion control plans.
Note: IDEM will be notified when the plan is approved.
Cc: Carmel DOCS
Ha. Co. Surveyor
File
July 10, 2003
Mr. Bob Olson
CSO
280 E. 96th Street, Suite 200
Indianapolis, IN 46240
RE: Project NO: 22546C
~; , apiro s Phase. II
Carm`et'Indiana
Dear Mr. Olson:
I have received and reviewed the plans submitted for the above-mentioned
project. I see nothing in the plans that would hamper law enforcement efforts.
If we can be of any further assistance to you, please contact us.
Respectfully,
~~ ~ ~
Michael D. Fogar~~1
Chief of Police
MDF:vb
cc: /Dept. of Community Services
Q317-571-2500
rfc :?a
t- -~s
il". *5
u ~':
A Nationally Accredit ~. °.hli 'forcement Agency
F: (3E7) ii7)<_25fl2
~~~°~n~~
~~~~
•.~ ~ = - v~
y~`~ ~ ~ ,r
~,% ,
i RFC ~
` ' ,1~~ ~1 <V~p
~~~ ~~CS ,
~'~~
~~:.
Corporate Xeadquarters
280 E. 96th Street, Suite 200
Indianapolis, Indiana 46240 .
T 317.848.7800 F 317.574.0957
C $ O www.csoarch.com
TO: Carmel Dept. of Community Services
One Civic Square
Carmel, Indiana 46032
ATTN: Mr. Lawrence Lillig
CONTACT PHONE: 571-2417
WE ARE SENDING YOU:
~ ~
r~~' ~~ ~
~taz~i RECEIVED
~- f JUL 8 2003
~~ DOCS
~C ,
Shapiro's Phase II, Carmel, Indiana
r~GQ PIES--~ _ ,~Q,4TE_~ ,~~~- ~ m '~~: ~ ,; ~°DESCF,2IPTIOtV ;~~;°~~`;~ _ ;'Y'
2 Set of Constructi on Documents
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED:
^ For approval
^ For your use
^ As requested
® Far review and comment
REMARKS:
^ Reviewed as submitted
^ As noted
^ Revise and Resubmit
^ Rejected
^ Resubmit for approval
^ Submit for distribution
^ Return corrected prints
^ Other:
Attached please find the Shapiro's Phase II construction documents for your review and comments for
the July 15, 2003 TAC meeting.
CC: FILE
LES OLDS
DATE: Juty 3, 2003
PROJECT NO: 22546C
By: Bob Olson
^ 1-HR Courier ^ 3-HR Courier ^ Fed-Ex 8:30 A. M. Delivery ^ Fed-Ex 10:30 A.M. Delivery ^ Fed-Ex Ground
^ Fed-Ex Saturday Delivery ^ Fed-Ex 3:00 P. M. Delivery ^ Hand Delivery
IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS INDICATED, PLEASE NOTIFY US AT ONCE.
Document2
JUL 09 '03 11~01RM
-\ ro
1 ~\ t,~
.) I,.'
pa°'
(D ~.(.hY
__/~~,
July 9, 2003
•
;Kenton C.'lR~nrd, Surueyar
~Plionc (.i r 7 177p_~~4,~ 5
`pot' (;t7177G.gG±R
CSO
Attn: Mr. Bob Olson
280 East 96ei Street, Suite 200
Indianapolis, IN 46240
VIA FACSIMILE; 574-0957
Re: Shapiro's Phase II
Dear Mr. Olson:
P.1/3
Suifc ~ SS
put 9{mniltwr C'mrnty Squnrr~
~nruhlesirillc, Indinrta 4GnGn-i±jn
The Hamilton County Surveyor's office has no comments in reference to this project
(submitted to our office on July 8, 2003).
Please call me with any questions. Thank you.
Sincerely, ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
C~w~J ' v . ~u~-~
nny Cho man
Plan Reviewer
Cc: City of Carmel, Hamilton County Highway Deparhnent, Hamilton County SCS
~!
-~P~~ ~° ~
~,
;: ,
~r' RECEIVED
~`-'' JUI. S 2GG3
~. ,
,~- . DOCS
~. ;,
~~~ ~,,
Vii- .--a7~ ~i
'__ _ l~,
~.
>- .