Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDept ReportCARMEL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS HEARING OFFICER DEPARTMENT REPORT Apri13, 2009 Old Meridian Plaza The applicant seeks the following development standards variance approval: Docket No. 09030011 V Section 20G.05.04.B(1)(a) Building height/one occupiable floor The site is located at 12863 Old Meridian Street and is zoned OM/Mixed Use Zone. Filed by Jon Dobosiewicz of Nelson & Frankenberger for Keystone Group, LLC General Info: This request, if approved, would permit the construction of a one-story office building to the rear of Old Meridian Plaza's Building One, which was approved in 2008. This building would replace the one and one-half story building, approved in August 2008, and would house the Veterans of Foreign Wars instead of the vet's office which was previously approved. Surrounding uses are primarily office and commercial. Analysis: The subject site is within the Old Meridian District, and is zoned Old Meridian/Mixed Use. The District has several requirements regarding building siting, scale, and design. The proposed structure would be to the rear of another, taller building, which would help screen it from the street, and would meet the building design requirements and intent of the District. Because the building would be set at the back of the lot, it would not be able to meet required setbacks or locate parking to the rear. Parking would be shared with the building to the front, in a central lot with shared parking access easements, and would meet the needs of both buildings. Variances for setback, street frontage, parking location, and building footprint were granted in 2008. The current variance is being requested because the original building was one and one-half story tall, while this building would be one story tall. The site remains essentially unchanged otherwise, and the building is architecturally very similar to the one proposed last year. The site will also undergo review by the Plan Commission through the ADLS Amend process. Sign variance requests have also been filed, and will be considered at the upcoming full Board hearing on April 27. Findings of Fact: Reduced height/setbacks 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the community because: Building Two would be largely screened by Building One and landscaping, and would also meet the design intent of the District. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: Building Two would be largely screened by Building One and landscaping, and would also meet the design intent of the District. 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: Building Two could not be built as proposed on the site, without the grant of variances and significant reconfiguration of both buildings. Recommendation: The Dept. of Community Services recammends positive consideration of Docket No. 09030011 V after all concerns have been addressed.