HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondenceLETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
STOEPPELWERTH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
9940 Allisonville Road
Fishers, Indiana 46038-2005
Phone (317)849-5935
FAX (317) 849-5942
DATE:
August 2, 2004
TO: Department of Community Services
One Civic Square
Carmel, Indiana 46032
ATTENTION: Jon Doboseiwicz
RE: Cherry Creek Estates, Section 2
WE ARE SENDING YOU ~ X ~ UPS [ ] Courier [ ~ O~hcr:
JOB NUMBER: 4340552
' ~ ,/,~~F~~~`~
;.3 00~~ ~'a-
COPIES SHEET
NO. DESCRIPTION
3 1-4 Recorded Secondary Plat
1 1-4 Recorded Secondary Plat (Mylar)
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
I I For Approval
I X I For Your Use
REMARKS:
~ X I As Requested
~ I
I I For Review and Comment
William A. Bryant
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
STOEPPELWERTH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
9940 Allisonville Road
Fishers, Indiana 46038-2005
Phone (317)849-5935
FAX (317) 849-5942
DATE: June 30, 2004
JOB NUMBER:
TO: Department of Community Service
1 Civic Square d~~~ ~ ~b X40
~ `c a
Carmel, Indiana 46032 GG ~`~ °~~
ATTENTION: Jon Dobosiewicz ~ vJ~ QC'"
RE: Cherry Creek Estates, Section 2 Pj ~
/ Ojl~/
WE ARE SENDING YOU [ X ] UPS [ ] Courier [ ] Other:
COPIES SHEET
NO.
DESCRIPTION
1 Secondary Plat
1 TAC Response Letter
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
~ ]For Approval
~ X J For Your Use
REMARKS:
Jon,
I X ] As Requested
[ I
We are preparing the enclosed plat for recording.
The TAC Response better is also enclosed. Please review.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (317) 577-3410.
[ I For Review and Comment
William A. Bryant
Platinum
0°~
July 9, 2004 ~~ ~
City of Carmel ~~
Board of Public Works and Safety
C/0 Department of Engineering
One Civic Square
Carmel, Indiana 46032
RE: Cherry Creek Estates, Section 2
Request for Secondary Plat Approval and Signatures
Dear Board Members:
RfC~F
JUl I p ~~~
DOCS
Please accept this letter as our formal request for approval and signatures for the Secondary Plat for the
above referenced project. The subdivision consists of 46 lots on 22.34 acres. We have previously
received approved construction plans from the City Engineer and were granted sewer and water
availability from this board. We will complete road paving by July 23, 2004.
Please let me know if you will require any additional information for us to obtain the boards approval.
Sincere)
i
imothy J. Walter, P.E.
Project Manager
Cc: Jon Dobiosiewicz„Carmel-C-ommunity Services.
Bill Bryant, Stoeppelweth and Associates.
File.
317 818 2900 O 317 818 2910 fax
9551 Delegates Row • Indianapolis, IN 46240
,:,
EL
:,. .~ - f
S
~' ~' ~'~'
CITY .` ~ -'C~-~' VI
May 7, 2004 J~~,~~iES at~tn~nav, Mavoa
Mr. William A. Bryant
Stoeppelwerth & Associates, Inc.
9940 Allisonville Road
Fishers, IN 46038
RE: Cbeny Creek Estates Section 2Subdivision-Project Review #3
Dear Mr. Bryant:
Q
RECFIVED
!1AY 1 "~04
DOCS
The City of Cannel has received both of your comment response letters and revised
drawings dated May 5, 2004 for the above mentioned project. The City's comments,
based upon your May 5, 2004 response letters, follow your original responses which have
been transposed into this letter for reference. The City's comments are bolded and
italicized.
SECONDARY PLAT
#12 Slopes at the rear of Lots 74-79 were revised. The Swale at the rear of Lots 74-75 has
a slope of 0.8% with a subsurface drain. The Swale is offset in the easement and will have
proper slopes to the Tree Preservation Easement. The cut shown has not been revised.
Refer to conunents to Iteur #I8, Slreet C-200 below.
#13 The common area does include Drainage and Utility Easements in the definition.
Thank you for the response.
SHEET C200-SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
#15 The Swale grades at Lot 120/103 were revised to maintain a I% slope.
T/re current plans indicate a slope of L5%. Thank you for the revision.
#18 Slopes at the rear of Lots 74-79 were revised. The Swale at the rear of Lots 74-75 has
a slope of 0.8% with a subsurface drain. The Swale is offset in the easement and will have
proper slopes to the Tree Preservation Easement. The cut shown has not been revised.
Per our p/tone discussion mr May 7, 2004, the proposed subsurface drain shall be u
double walled, smooth interior, perforated pipe to facilitate future nrairdeuance. The
subsurface drain shall be laid at a slope dial matt/:es t/re slope of the Swale. The City
recommends that the proposed srvale be located as far north in the drainage easement
as possible while still maintaining the proposed slope. Locating the Swale as such
would minimize the impact the cut will have on dre root s}~steur of the trees in the Tree
DIiPARll1EST OF t:SGi]E19i1SG
Osr Cn;c Sricaas. CAB'QpL, I\ 40032 Orrice ~7'S71?441 FLT ;17.571 ?439
F.l i.Sll, kn~rrse a~i.eu nnrl.in.uc
Mr. William A. Bryant
May 7, 2004
Page 2 of 3
Preservation Easement. Adjust t/re location ofStrrrctru•e 84B as needed, bused on any
relocation of the Swale to the north.
#19 The Swale grades were adjusted. The storm sewer STR slopes at the rear of Lots 74-
79 were revised. The Swale at the rear of Lots 74-75 has a slope of 0.8% with a
subsurface drain. The Swale is offset in the easement and will have proper slopes to the
Tree Preservation Easement. The cut shown has not been revised. Structure 84B was not
relocated.
Thmrk you for revising the Swale grades. Per our phone discussion on May 7, 2004,
your response above was mistyped. The sentence relating to revisions to the storm
sewer STR slopes at the rear of Lots 74-79 was to have referenced the slope of the
Swale. Refer to the City's comments to Item #IS above as it relates to the remainder of
your response.
SHEET C400, C401, C402-STREET PLAN AND PROFILES
#22 All chokers were removed from the plans as requested
Thank you for the revision.
C403-ENTRANCE DETAIL
The detail at Hazel Dell Parkway Entrance was removed from the plans and will be
included with the Section 5 plans. Remaining Street Sheets were renumbered.
Thank you for the revision.
SHEET C802-CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
The pavement section specifications were revised as follows:
5" of SD base
7" of Compacted Stone Base #53
A note that all paving shall be completed in one paving season was also added. This will
be subject to weather with fall pavement being installed. Full pavement will be the
following spring.
Thank you for the revision. Please limit Spring paving to surface courses only.
PIPE SLOPES/VELOCITIES
We have verified the velocity behveen STR 77 to STR 76. Per our computer models, the
slope of 5.00% fora 15" RCP with an N-0.13 is 5.47 fps. No revisions to the plans were
completed.
Per our phone discussion on May 7`h, 1004, the design storm for the pipe nehvork does
not result in a full flow condition for the pipe in question. The City's subconsultmrt
calculations indicate that the velocity in the pipe under fill flow conditions is 11.77 fps.
Please revise the slope of tl:e pipe by lowering flee invert of Structure No.77 such that
the full flow pipe velocity does not exceed 10 fps.
Mr. William A. Bryant
May 7, 2004
Page 3 of 3
Acknowledge that the Carmel standards will be revised and implemented with a
minimum slope of not less than 0.30% and a velocity of 2.5 fps.
STRUCTURES NUMBERS/CORRESPONDING TO PREVIOUS SECTIONS
The drainage map was corrected to show that STR 90, 91 and 92 receives 1.18 acres of
runoff instead of the 1.41 acres shown on the prior submittal. A new map is enclosed.
Thank you for the revision.
Please provide our office with a follow up letter and revised plans indicating all revisions.
It is critical that this office be made aware of all modifications made on the plans being
re-submitted, particularly if any such changes are considered "new" or fall outside of the
City's initial reviews.
If you have questions, please contact our office at 571-2441
Gary R Du}5can Jr., Assistant Cit}~ Engineer
Departm t of Engineering
Enclosures
Cc: Mike McBride, City Engineer
Dick Hill, Department of Engineering
Jon Dobosiewicz, Department ofCommunity Services
Jolur Duffy, Director Carmel Utilities
Dan Greskamp, Construction Manager
Paul Pace, Distribution
Jim Haag, Collection
Tim Walter, Platinum Properties
Greg Hoyes, Hamilton County Surveyor's Office
Gregory Ilko, CrossRoads Engineers
Y:\eng~shared\gduncan\CHERCKEST2RE V 3.doc
.~~
CONSULTING ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS
David J. Stoeppelwerth, P.E., P.L.S. Curtis C. Huff, PL.S.
Presidem. C.E.O. ViccPresidrnt. C.O O.
R.M. Stoeppelwerth, P.F.., P.L.S.
Presidcm Emcriwx
~~V~-J lam- "_`-t~'1C
May 5, 2004
City of Carmel
City Engineer
One Civic Square
Carmel, Indiana 36032
Attention: Dick Hill
r_>/ t
v ~~n _~
vi
{ ~C c~,<O
1 ~J' ~`'~
Re: Cherry Creek Estates, Section 2
Dear Mr. Hill:
Please find 2 sets of Construction Plans and supporting documents which were
revised per a comment letter dated Apri127, 2004. Those comments were addressed as
follows:
SECONDARY PLAT
#12 Slopes at the reaz of Lots 74 - 79 were revised. The Swale at the rear of
Lots 74 - 75 has a slope of 0.80% with asub-surface drain. The Swale is
offset in the easement and will have proper slopes to the Tree Preservation
Easement. The cut shown has not been revised.
#13 The Common Area does include Drainage and Utility Easements in the
definition.
SHEET C200 -SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
I5. The Swale grades at Lot 120/103 were revised to maintain a 1 % slope.
18. Slopes at the reaz of Lots 74 - 79 were revised. The Swale at the rear of
Lots 74 - 75 has a slope of 0.80% with asub-surface drain. The Swale is
offset in the easement and will have proper slopes to the Tree Preservation
Easement. The cut shown has not been revised.
19. The Swale grades were adjusted. The storm sewer STR Slopes at the rear
of Lots 74 - 79 were revised. The Swale at the rear of Lots 74 - 75 has a
slope of 0.80% with asub-swface drain. The Swale is offset in the
easement and will have proper slopes to the Tree Preservation Easement.
The cut shown has not been revised. Structwe 84B was not relocated.
9940 Allisonville Road • Fishers, Indiana 46038-2005 • (317) 849-5935 • I-800-728-6917 • FAX: (317) 849-5942
,;
Carmel City Engineer
Dick Hill
May 5, 2004
Page 2
SHEET C400, C401, C402 -STREET PLAN & PROFILES
#22 All chokers were removed from the plans as requested.
C403 -ENTRANCE DETAIL
The detail at Hazel Dell Parkway Entrance was removed from the plans and
will be included with Section 5 plans. Remaining street sheets were
- - renumbered. - -- - -- - - - -- - - -
SHEET C802 -CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
The pavement section specifications were revised as follows:
5" of SD Base
7" Compacted Stone Base #53
A note that all paving is to be completed in one paving season was
also added. This will be subject to weather with fall pavement being
installed. Full pavement will be the following spring.
If you have any questions, please regazding these revisions, please call me at (317)
577-3410.
Very truly yours,
ST~OE~PPE~LW~ERTH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
G'(/~'~Zivf '~/~;1~
William A. Bryant
Cc: Tim Walter
Jon Dobosiewicz
S/4340552/Agency
;' I
„ ` .,
CI ~ ~'F~u~ EL ~ ~e~ doss
TAr~les 13RAI~~:v~; n'IA~-oR a,
April 27, 2004
Mr. R'illiam A. Bryant
Stoeppelwerth & Associates, Inc.
9940 Allisonville Road
Fishers, IN 46038
RE: Cherry Creek Estates Section 2 Subdivision-Project Review #2
Dear Mr. Bryant:
I am utilizing the same format as was used with our Project Review #l. Our comments, based upon your
February 18, 2004 response letter, follow our original comments, item by item. These comments are
bolded and italicized.
COMMENTS
Secondary Plat
Item #11. Why is the easement on the north and east sides of the lots only a drainage easement?
Your response is acceptable.
Item #12. This office will only permit areas of "Tree Preservation" if drainage is fully accommodated
for these properties.
7t does not appear that adequate slopes can be maintained in the rear yard Swale of Lots 74-79. It
will be ver}' difficult to cut up to 4 foot deep srvales against this tree preservation easement and still
nllmv these trees to survive. In addition, the Swale at the back of Lots 74 and 75 are much below this
Deparhnent's minimum standards for slope. Underdrain installation and n+ainteuanee will be very
dijficul! with trees in close proximity. Recomn+end addi(ional yard drabr between Lots 74 and 75.
Item #13. In the Legend, how is "Common Area" defined? Does it include drainage/detention/utility
easement?
Does commmr area definition include DrtrLrage and Utili[v Easements?
Sheet C200-Site Development Plan
Item #14. Show and label adjacent areas/sections as existing (lot numbers, existing infrastructure,
etc.). The information should be legible but distinguishable from the proposed areas. This would
apply to all sheets. This includes showing adjacent "neck downs" along road, using broken dimension
lines if necessary.
Thank you jorlhe revision.
Item #15. Where is the outlet for surface drainage at lots 119, 1 IS and 104? It appears from the
elevations that surface drainage from lots 122, 121, 120, 119, 118, 103,104 and 105 converge at this
location. Please extend the storm sewer [o a new and additional structure located on the rear property
line between Lots 104-107. 116-1 19.
Subsurface drains should be provided in swales with ]% slope or less. Lots 720/103 hove this'
sitrralion.
Item #16. The rear yards of lots 91 to 99 appear to be flat with little slope and no defined provision for
drainage. Please provide Swale and proposed grades.
Acceptable.
Item #17. If tree preservation is required, drainage swales and storm sewers must be provided.
Acceptable.
Dernu'I:vusn~r or Ii~cineetu~c
O.~r: Clnc S~uaae, Csevntt. IV' 46032 Orncl=. 317.71.2441 F:vs 317$71.2439
1'. \L\ I I. I:wrasa (rCi.ca rmcl.in. un
Mr. William A. Bryant
April 27, 2004
Page 2
Item #18. Add note, stating the need to provide for drainage Swale in front of tree preservation.
Private SSD will not be enough.
See conement #12.
Item #19. Move stmcture 84B to allow a Swale, from Lot 76/77, to be installed. Show elevations and
slopes.
See comment #12.
Item #20. Show the design slopes associated with the Swale from stmcture 84B [0 90 (also on Sheet
C201).
Acceptable.
Item #21. Clear up easement label discrepancies.
Acceptable.
Item #22. May need to move neck downs away from inlets/sag in road, but also need to see their
separation distance from one(s) in section to the west (we want appropriate and evenly distributed
where possible).
Ii'e are requesting that all "chokers" be elineinated from the street design in this and all fie[nre
sections.
Item #23. For all swales, include proposed slopes.
Acceptable.
Sheet C201-Site Development Plan
Item #24. Identify the termination of the sanitary sewer at the northeast comer (Existing Structure #_
7 ).
Acceptable.
Item #25. Show the length, size and slope of the pipe from structure 70 [0 69.
Acceptable.
Item #26. Show how all rear yards of lots 85-90 will have drainage provided. It appears the rear yards
are flat with no slope for drainage. Also, the area between the rear property lines and lake #3 is flat.
Show how these areas will drain,
Acceptable.
Item #27. Lake #3 indicates a 100-year elevation of 760.35. The typical 100-year elevation symbol
and the contour surrounding the lake indicate an elevation of 761. Please clarify peak elevation and
emergency spillway details.
Acceptable.
Item #28. On Section A-A, the arrow from existing grade points to nothing.
Acceptable.
Item #29. Where is the emergency spillway and details for lake 3? Show length, size and slope of
outlet pipe.
Acceptable.
Item #30. The pad elevation for Lot 85 is too low. 761.8 is the same as the side yard elevation
between Lot 85 and 86. The pad elevations for these two lots are very close to the 100-year elevation.
Will there be basements, walkouts, etc. for lots backing up to the lake? This office would recommend
to the Building Commissioner that basements/walk-outs not be allowed for these lots.
Acceptable.
Item #31. Lots 85 thru 90 need MFPG (Minimum Flood Protection Grade) elevations and notes
regarding basements/walk-outs. MFPG means that no building opening (windows, window wells,
doors, etc.) will be allowed below this elevation.
Acceptable.
Sheet C202-Tree Removal Plan
Item #32. Is this sheet incomplete?
Acceptable.
Sheet C30Q, C301-Erosion Control
Mr. William A. Bryant
Apri127, 2004
Page 3
Item #33. Why is the printing on these sheets so light? These sheets do not seem to be shoeing any
erosion control details and do not seem to indicate anything of value.
Acceptable.
Sheet C40Q, C401, C402-Street Plan and Profiles, Intersection Details
Item #34. It would be helpful if the width of the knockdowns on Tanana and Osage Drives would be
indicated on these sheets.
As with Item #22, we have requested that all "chokers" be eliuthiated.
Item #35. Please dimensionally locate the knockdowns. Believe this was also requested in our review
of Section 1 B.
Same as Item #22 and #34.
Sheet C403-Entrance betail
Item #36. It would be helpful if this sheet were identified as Hazel Dell Parkway Entrance Detail.
This is to be included in Section 5 plans.
Sheet 501, C600-Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer Plan and Profiles
Item #37. Concrete cradles are not permitted. Please indicate stone cradles wherever applicable.
Acceptable.
Sheet C601-Storm Sewer Plan and Profile
Item #38. On the pipe from curb inlet structure 81 to yard inlet stmeture 76 with a slope of 4.20%,
what velocity will [his be?
Acceptable.
Item #39. The slopes for the l Y'pipes indicated on [he two profiles on the right hand portion of the
sheet are very flat!
Acceptable.
Sheet C700-Water Plan
Item #40. Can you dimension the length of water service lines as was done with the sanitary laterals?
Acceptable.
SheeC C802-Constmction Details
Item #41. On the pavement cross-section, substitute 9" #53 stone base instead of 5" #53 and 4" #2.
We are revising ota• Pavement Sectimt specification as follows:
• Change 3" of HAC Binder #9 to 9' of SD Base.
• Change 9"Compacted Stave Base #53 to 7"Compacted Stone Base #53.
• Add, "All Paving is to be Completed rn One Paving Season" to the Typical Street Sections
on the plans.
Item #42. On the typical cross section, placement of [he sidewalk should be 12" from the right of way
line, not on the right of way line.
Acceptable.
Item #43. Regarding sidewalk details, sidewalks should be indicated as a minimum of 5' width.
Acceptable.
Please provide our office with a follow up letter and revised plans indicating all revisions. It is critical that
this office be made aware of all modifications made on the plans being re-submitted, particularly if any
such changes are considered "new" or fall outside of our initial reviews.
Mr. William A. Bryan[
April 27, 2004
Page 4
If you have questions, Mike McBride or me at 571-2441.
Sin 1~/
T
Dick Hill, Assistant Director
Department of Engineering
Enclosures
Cc: Mike McBride, City Engineer
Jon Dobosiewicz, Department of Community Services
John Duffy, Director Carmel Utilities
Dan Greskamp, Construction Manager
Paul Pace, Distribution
Jim Haag, Collection
Tim Walter, Platinum Properties
Greg Hoyes, Hamilton County Surveyor's Office
S:\DHILL\PROIREV04\CHERCKEST2REV2
April 20, 2004
Mr. \Villiam A. Bryant
Stoeppehverth & Associates, Inc.
9940 Allisonville Road
Fishers, IN 46038-2005
RE: Chern• Creek Estates Amenih~ Area-Project Revietr #1
Dear Mr. Bryant:
\i'e have reviewed the initial construction plans submitted for this project and offer the follo\ving comments:
GENERAL INFORMATION
I. The project site is located within current City of Carmel Corporate Limits.
2. Jurisdictions:
• Streets and Right of \Vay- City of Carmel.
• Water, Sanitary Sewers - City of Carmel.
• Storm Sewers/Drainage - City of Carmel.
• Regulated/ Legal Drains- Hamilton County Surveyor's OCfice.
3. Board of Public \Vorks and Safety Requirements:
• Water and Sanitary Sewer Availability Cor swimming pools/pool houses.
• If an irrigation system is planned for this development, additional Board of Public Works and Safely
approval will be required.
• Temporary Construction Entrance (if applicable)
• Please be advised dmt any open cuts ojdedieated streets wit! require separate Board ojPublic li'orks
and Sajery approval
• Any permanent improvement (including irrigation systems) to be installed within dedicated right of way
or dedicated easements. This approval would require a Consent to Encroach Agreement between the
Owner and the City of Carmel.
• Commercial Curb Cut Approval for the driveway.
I am also enclosing a schedule for Board of Public Works and Safety meeting dates and agenda deadlines For
your use. Please use the Engineering Department deadlines for submissions to the Board.
Any subnrissian to the Board requires prior approval by die Canne! Clay Pfan Comnrissiau and/or the
Board ojZaning Appeals (ijapplicable) and completion ojreview by the Tedmica! Advisory Conunittee.
A!! written requests to be placed mr the Board's agenda must include the appropriate Docket Number and
the date (or dates) ojapproval by the Plan Commission m+d/or die Board ojZwiing Appeals (ij
applicable).
4. T.A.C. Review/Drawings submitted for approval:
We request that all comments and comment letters generated by this office be answered in writing and be
accompanied by a drawing reflecting requested revisions. Final drawings will not be approved for
construction until all Engineering Department and Utility Department issues have been resolved. The design
engineer must certify all drawings submitted for final approval. This office will require a minimum of five-
sets of drawings for approval aRer all issues have been resolved. The drawings will be stamped as approved
and will be signed by the City Engineer and the Director of Carmel Utilities. The Owner will receive one-set
which is to be maintained on the construction site at all times. Cannel Utilities will receive hvo-sets, our
Public Works Inspector will receive one-set and one-set will be maintained in [he Engineering Department.
Dl;eaa-I:\u~:~T or E~clxeeat~c
O~c CIv'1C S~uner:. CAaau'.1, IV' 4(032 Orr-Ice 31757'13441 Fns 317.5712439
I'. \Ir\I I. I:wccoc(Jci.ca rnicl, in. us
Mc William A. Bryanr
April 20, 2004
Page 2
5. Please be advised that any installation of signs, walls, irrigation systems, etc. within dedicated right of way or
dedicated easements will require a Consent to Encroach Agreement with the City of Carmel's Board of
Public Works and afety.
6. Carmel Utilities should be provided drawings for review of water and sanitary sewer issues. They will
provide a separate review regarding these issues.
7. Carmel Utilities does not subscribe to "Holey Moley" and should be contacted directly for all water main and
sanitary sewer main locations.
8. There are no Performance/Main[enance Guarantees associated with this development. A Right of Way
Permit and Right of Way bond will be required for the curb cut. Contact Fred Glaser, our Right of Way
Manager/Inspector for details regarding this permit.
AVAILABILITY AND CONNECTION FEES
9. Availability (acreage) Fees for this area were paid with Section 1 B. Therefore, no additional Availability
Fees will be assessed.
]0. Current Connection Fees are:
• Swimming Pools - 1.60 E.D.Us/1000 square feet
• Pool House -There is no classification. Please provide figures if applicable.
COMMENTS
Construction Plans
Title Sheet
I ]. Label the Amenity Area on the site plan as being part of existing Section 1B. This area is included in the
Cherry Creek Estates, Section 1 B recorded secondary plat
Sheet C200-Site Plan /Sheet C201-Site Development Plan
12. ]s the 10' x 10' area a wading pool?
I3. Identify the area northwest of the pool. Is this a pool house? If so, are there rest rooms? If so, please
provide water usage figures for the building.
14. Also identify the area between the building and the pool. It looks like there are columns/posts.
15. What is the rectangular area adjacent to the northwest comer of the basketball court? Please identify on the
plans.
I6. Label Cherry Creek Boulevard, Wildcat Drive and Washita Court on this sheet.
17. Show a detail as to how the new curbs will tie into the existing street curbs.
18. Have the sidewalks in the street right of way been constructed? If so, they should be labeled as existing.
19. The sidewalk in the right of way should extend through the drive. Provide breaks in the curb on either side of
[he drive.
20. What is the bold line in the parking area?
21. What are the two other lines in the parking area that don't seem to belong to any designation?
22. Designate a parking stall length.
23. Identify and dimension all right of way lines.
24. How will the mulch be contained in the playground area?
25. Will the Surveyor's Office allow this encroachment?
The above comments are based upon the Engineering Departments initial review of [he Amenity Area. Please provide
our office with a follow up letter and revised plans indicating all revisions. Second and subsequent reviews will focus
only on revised items. It is critical that this office be made aware of all modifications made on the plans being re-
submitted, particularly if any such changes are considered "new" or fall outside of our initial review.
Mr. William A. Bryan[
April 20, 2004
Page 3
Jf you have questions, contact Mike McBride or me a[ 57] -2441.
Sinc ely,
Dick ill, Assistant Director
Department of Engineering
Enclosures
Cc: Mike McBride, City Engineer (w. o. encl.)
Jon Dobosiewicz, Department of Community Services (w.o. encl.)
John Duffy, Director Carmel Utilities (w.o. encl.)
Paul Pace, Distribution (w.o. encl.)
Jim Haag, Collection (w.o. encl.)
Tim Walter, Platinum Properties
Greg Hoyes, Hamilton County Surveyor's Office (fadw.o. encl.)
John South, Hamilton County Soil & Water Conservation District (fax/w.o. encl.)
Greg Ilko, Crossroad Engineers
S:\DH ILL\PROJREV03\CEEERCKESTAMENITYAREA
CONSULTING ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS
David J. Stoeppelwerth, P.E., P.L.S. Curtis C. Huff, P.L.S. A.M. Stoeppelwerth, P.E.. P.L.S.
Presidem. C.E.O. Vice-President, C.O.O. Presidem Emeriws
February 23, 2004
Carmel City Engineer
1 Civic Square
Carmel, Indiana 46032
Attention: Dick Hill
Re: Cherry Creek Estates, Section 2
Deaz Mr. Hill:
Please find,enclosed one set of Construction Plans and supporting documents which
were revised per a comment letter date January 22, 2004. Those comments were addressed
as follows:
DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
A revised 1CPR model that reflects the 24 inch pipe and the elevations per the plans
is enclosed.
PIPE SLOPES/VELOCTTIES
The report shows that the pipe between STR. 77 to STR. 76 has a velocity of 5.47
fps. This can be found in the pipe calculations, which is provided.
Also, a worksheet on pipe sizes and slopes to achieve a 2.5 fps. is enclosed.
There aze runs that are shown to have a slope of 0.20%. The reason for this is
to maintain cover over the storm and to avoid conflicts with the sanitary sewer.
We have maintained the minimum of 2.5 fps, therefore, these runs have not
been revised.
ADEQUATE LOT DRAINAGE
At the rear of Lots 91-95, arrows were shown to show sheet flow to the creek.
Between Lots 95 and 96, a spot elevation grade was revised to eliminate potential
ponding.
STRUCTURES NUMBERS /CORRESPONDING TO PREVIOUS SECTIONS
Calculations for STR. 90, 91, 92 and the existing structure are enclosed.
9940 Allisonville Road • Fishers, Indiana 46038-2005 • (317) 849-5935 • I-800-728-6917 • FAX: (317) 849-5942
City of Carmel Engineer
Dick Hill
February 23,2004
Page 2 of 2
PIPE SIZES
All discrepancies between the calculations and the plans were corrected.
OVERFLOW LOCATION SHOWN
At the South edge of Lake 3 and Lot 85, a protection grade of 761.5 was shown
and labeled.
OFFSTTE INFORMATION
On sheet C100, C201, and C601 shows the information for connection to the
existing 12 inch pipe.
If you have any further questions, please feel to call me at (317) 577-3410.
Very truly yours,
Cc: Greg Hoyes
Angelina Butler
STO/EP,PEL~W~ERTH/& ASSOCIATES, INC.
William A. Bryant
S:/4340552/Agenry
CONSULTING ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS
Hamilton County Surveyor
One Hamilton Squaze
Noblesville, Indiana 46060
Attention: Greg Hoyes
February 23, 2004
R.M. Sroeppelwer[h, P.E., P.L.S.
Presidem Emeri W s
~oCS c~Dtis
Re: Cherry Creek Estates, Section 2
David 1. S[oeppelwe¢h, p.E., P.L.S. Curtis C. Huff, P.L.S.
Presidem, C.E.O. Vice-Presidem, C.O.O.
A copy of the response letter from Crossroads to the City of Carmel is enclosed.
Revised calculations are also provided.
2. An outlet pemut request for the Vestal Drain is enclosed along with the application
fee of $150.00.
3. Acknowledge that additional comments may be warranted.
If you have any further questions, please feel free to call me at (317) 577-3410.
Very truly yours,
STOEPPELWERTH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
~',~~~0,~=.
William A. Bryant
Deaz Mr. Hoyes:
Please fmd enclosed one set of Construction Plans and supporting documents which were
revised per a comment letter dated February 3, 2004. Those comments were addressed as follours:
Cc: Tim Walter
Angelina Butler
S:/4340552/Aeenry
9940 Allisonville Road • Fishers, Indiana 46038-2005 • (317) 849-5935 • I-800-728-6917 • FAX: (317) 849-5942
~..
~0~~'~ ) \
Mr. William A. Bryant ~O ~ (~ /
Stoeppehverth & Associates, Inc. ~ z v
9940 Allisonville Road ~ ~ ~~
Fishers, IN 46035-2005
January 22, 2004
RE.~tr`ern'CsraP~~Estates ec tonll"A/UtafSu~division-Storm Drainage As Built Review #1
Dear Mr. Bryant:
. ~~.
_- ~
~~ ~~
T. ~
O rrj i
O~ ~G ~~
a,
N'e have engaged Crossroad Engineers to assist us with project review, particularly in regards to stomt drainage issues.
I have enclosed a copy of Crossroad's initial review of the as built drawings submitted for Cherry Creek Estates,
Sections 1 A and 1 B. Ptease review these comments and provide a response letter at your earliest convenience. The
Performance Guarantee release for storm sewers will be scheduled upon satisfactory resolution of these issues
If you have questions, contact Mike McBride or me at 571-2441.
Sine e ,
r
Dick Hill, Assistant Director
Department of Engineering
Enclosure
Cc: Mike McBride, City Bngineer
Jon Dobosiewicz, Department of Community Services
Tim Walter, Platinum Properties
Greg Hoyes, Hamilton County Surveyor's Office
Greg Ilko, Crossroad Engineers
S:\DH I LL\PROJRE V 04\Crl ERCKEST I ABSTORMASBLT# I
l~rl',AR I'JIL'V"I' OP ESGIVEI:RtNG
Our. CIVIC SQDAar, Calzvlri., IN 4603? Orncl: 317.571244] Fna 317.5712439
1'SMeAII. k~eecc~ei.einnel.iaus
JAb~[ES BRAT\"A}3D, MAYOR
;~,
January 5, 2004
Mr. Dick Hill
City of Carmel
Engineering Department
One Civic Square
Carmel, IN 46032
RE: Cherry Creek Estates Subdivision,
Section lA & 1B
As-Built Review
Dear Dick:
The following comments are in conclusion to the project review of Cherry Creek Estates
Subdivision, Section lA & 1B:
• An apparent low point occurs between Lot #50 and Lot #51. The contractor
should address this ponding area.
• Many of the side yard swales do not have a breaking point in the center of the
yard with surface drainage sloping towards the front or the back. An example
of this occurs in the side yards of Lots 5 through ll. Although positive
drainage is apparent, the design intentions are clearly not met.
• The 18" RCP between storm sewer structures 17 and 18 was placed at a slope
of 0.54%; however, the plans called for the pipe to be placed at a slope of
1.00%, while the drainage calculations state the pipe run should be 4.90%. In
fact, the storm sewer design on the construction plans for many structures does
not correspond to the respective calculation data in the Drainage Report. This
makes it difficult to verify if the pipes have suitable capacity as constructed. It
is not known if a design change on the plans came after the approval of the
drainage calculations, but investigations into the discrepancies between the
two may be warranted.
• It appears, by the as-built top of bank elevations given, that all three storm
events breach the southeast detention pond (Lake 2) along the south bank.
The design calls for a top of berm elevation of 762.00, but the as-built shows
it as low as 761.40. The berm should be reconstructed to match the design.
Please feel free to call me at 780-6527 if you should have any questions or need additional
information on these subjects.
Sincerely,
--~-- - ~ 341750 uth Sherman Br. o Bee[h Grove, IN 46167 a Tel 317480x7555 D Fax 317~7Bn~6525
January 22, 2004
Mc William A. Bryant
Stoeppelwerth & Associates, Inc.
9940 Allisonville Road
'; ,,
~. ~
~'-/ ~ ~~ ~~'r
I--~ O~~rr~TFO
E ' s `~~
a~~ o o3~,P
6~ ~~ ~~~
Fishers, IN 46038-2005
RE ~Chlrt`ry' -reek Estates35ec[ion 2 ubdivision-Storm Drainage Review #1
Dear Mr. Bryant:
We have engaged Crossroad Engineers to assist us with project review, particularly in regards to storm drainage issues.
I have enclosed a copy of Crossroad's initial review of the construction.plans for Cherry Creek Estates, Section 2.
Please review these comments and provide a response letter at your earliest convenience.
If you have questions, contact Mike McBride or me at 571-2441.
Sincereli
Dick/Hill, Assistant Director
Department of Engineering
Enclosure
Ce: Mike McBride, City Engineer
Jon Dobosiewicz, Department of Community Services
Tim Walter, Platinum Properties
Greg Hoyes, Hamilton County Surveyor's Office
Greg Ilko, Crossroad Engineers
S:\UH ILL\PROJRE V 04\CFIERCKEST2STORM,Y I
Der,urr~lr_~~r oP 13~c[nElsalnc
Onr: CIVIC SQuARe, CAR?IEL, 1N 4603? Orna: 377.5712447 FAx 317.571.2439
I]>I:AI I, kwccseLCi.curmel.iaru
JAMES BI2AINARD, MAYOR
Technical Advisory Committee
Engineering Review Checklist for Commercial Designs
Project Name: Cherry Creek Estates Subdivision, Section 2
Owner: Platinum Properties L.L.C.
Location: Tanana Drive, Osage Drive, & Kickapoo Trial
Section(s): N/A
Date Received: January 6, 2004
Review Date: January 19, 2004
T.A.C. Date: --
Primary ~ Construction
~X 1s` Review ~ T.A.C. Review
Drainage
;\
i,
. ~,
;.
~r
`" JaP12004
RECEIVED
CITY
_~. ENGNEER
F^
\, _. .:..
^ Drainage Approval (City or County)
Per Hnmllton County survey the drainage is in the jurisdiction of the Ciry of
Carmel.
^ Detention Required - 10 yr pre / 100 yr post
Lake #3 will be used for the detention area for this project. It was designed for 10
year pre-development and 100 year post-development.
^ Drainage Calculations
In the drainage report the input report, L3-OUTDS, states a 12"pipe, 118' in
length, an upstream invert of 7J~.5, and a downstream invert of 751.37. This is assumed
to be the outlet pipe from STR. 70 to STR. 69. However, design plans show a 24"pipe,
104' in length, an upstream invert of 755.5, and a downstream invert of 754.11. Please
review and revise accordingly and verify the changes in storage elevations and outflows.
^ Pipe Design - 10 yr flood
Yes, the pipes were designed fora 10-year flood
^ Pipe Slopes /Velocities (2.5 fps min, 10 fps max)
After reviewing the pipe from STR. 77 to STR. 76, it was found that the pipe has a
velocity of 11.77 fps, which is greater than the City of Carmel 's maximarm velocity of 10 fps.
The design of smaller pipes (i. e. 12 "- 36') with n slope less than 0.30% is nol ndvised .
There are a mrrnber of pipes listed below 0.30%. Please review and revise, or conmrent on the
necessity far such flat slopes.
^ Adequate Lot Drainage
The drainage in the backyards of Lots 91-95 appears to flow north to the creek;
however, the proposed 762 contour cuts through existing contours of elevations 764, 765,
and 766. There are no proposed contours shown for elevations 761, 760, etc. Please
show sheet flow from the proposed 762 contour to the creek.
Behveen Lot 96 and 9.i there is an apparent low spot. Ponding may occur at this
location.
^ Surface drainage shown with arrows
Yes.
o Adequate Easement Widths
Yes.
^ Grading Elevations Shown
Yes.
^ Structures Numbers /Corresponding to Previous Sections
Structures 90, 91, 92, and the existing structure are not !n the drainage
calculations. The calculations for these structures and their respective pipes should be
provided.
^ Pipe Sizes
In many instances there are discrepancies between the pipe data from the
drainage calculations and the storm sewer profiles. For instance, many pipe sizes,
slopes, crud elevations have conflicting numbers between the two pieces of data. Please
supply revised pipe sizing and calculation data.
. .
^ Overflow Location Shown -
It does not nppenr that the emergency spillway weir has been sized to
accommodate 1.2~ times the overall 100 year outflow with a minimum freeboard of one
foot above the anticipatedflow over the weir, but it is obvious that the entire west bank of
Lake #3 will serve as a natural spillway. However, it appears that water would also
leave'the site through the South side of Lot 8J. Atop of bank height greater than 761.5
should be provided around the South/Southwestedge of Lake #3, protecting Lot 85 and
Delaware Trace Section 3. Please review and revise accordingly.
^. Off-Site information (i.e. tying into sewers in existing sections or preparing for
future sections)
Information for the existing structure, which STR. 92 is tying into, should
be provided.
^ Existing sewers and structures labeled and/or drawn as such, including as-built
elevations -drainage calculations based upon as-built situation, not original plans.
Existing information appears accurate.
Additional Questions /Comments
None
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
TECHNICAL REVIEW AND COMMENT
Hamilton County Soil and Water Conservation District
1108 South 9'h Street, Noblesville IN 46060
Ph- 317-773-1432 or Email at .john-south(a~iaswcd.org
PROJECT NAME:
SUBMITTED BY
REVIEWED BY:
Cherry Creek Estates Sec. 2
Platinum Development
C/O Tim Walters
9551 Delegates Row
Indianapolis, IN 46240
317-818-2900
Stoeppelwerth & Associates
9940 Allisonville Road
Fishers, IN 46038-2005
John B. South P.E.
Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control
PLAN REVIEW DATE: DECEMBER 24, 2003
LOCATION: East side of Hazel Dell Road at Cherry Tree Road
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sec. 22
ACREAGE: 25 ACRES
TOWNSHIP: 18N RANGE: 4E CIVIL TOWNSHIP: Clay
SOIL SURVEY MAP SHEET: 45
The technical review and comments are intended to evaluate the completeness of the erasion and sediment control plan for the
The erosion and sediment control plan submitted was not reviewed for the adequacy of the engineering design. Al!
included in the plan, as well as those recommended in the comments should be evaluated as to their feasihiliry by a
qualifred individual with structural practices designed by a qualified engineer. The plan has not heen reviewed for local, .state,
or federal permits that may be required to proceed with [his project. Additional information, including design calculations may
be requested to further evaluate [he erosion and sediment control plan.
The erosion and sediment control plan has been reviewed and it has been determined that the plan:
X Satisfies the minimum requirements and intent of 327IAC 15-5 (Rule 5). Notification will be forwarded to the
Indiana lle artment of N;nvironmental Mana emen[.
Proper implementation of the erosion and sediment control plan and inspections ojthe construction site by the developer or a
representative are necessary to minimize off-site sedimentation. The developer should be aware that unforeseen construction
activities and weather conditions might affect the performance oja practice or the erosion and sediment control plan. The plan
must be a~lexible document, with provisions to mods or substitute practices as necessary.
Note:
• Provide documentation that sediment basin meets design specifications.
• Please note on sheet C300 that The work show on this sheet needs to be completed before mass
grading can start.
• Construction has already commenced on this site.
Cc: Carmel DOGS, Ha. Co. Surveyor, IDEM, File
CONSULTING ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS
David ]. Stoeppelwerth, P.E., P.L.S. Curtis C. Hoff, P.L.S.
Presidmr, C E.O. Vice-Presidem, C.O.O.
December 22, 2003
Carmel City Engineer
1 Civic Square
Carmel, Indiana 46032
Attention: Dick Hill
R.M. Stoeppelwerth, P.E., P.L.S.
Presidem emeriws
~+ `~\
RECEIVED '~
DEC 23 2GG3
DOCS
i`. ,~,__
Re: Cherry Creek Estates, Section 2
Deaz Mr. Hill:
Please find enclosed one set of Construction Plans and supporting documents
which were revised per a comment letter date November 18, 2003. Those comments
were addressed as follows:
Comments
Secondary Plat
11. The easement on the north side is only a drainage easement for the purpose of
not having any utilities in this area.
12. There is sufficient drainage being accommodated in the "Tree Preservation"
azea.
13. The "Common Area'' is defined as per the Covenants and Restrictions which
is recorded.
Sheet C200-Site Development Plan
14. Adjacent areas/section on existing (lot numbers, existing infra~ructure, etc.)
was shown.
15: The outlet for the surface drainage for Lots 119, 118 and 104 will drain to an
existing yard inlet built with SetionlB at the reaz of Lots 102 and 103. The
grades of the reaz of Lot 118-122, 103-105 were revised. A storm sewer was
not extended to the reaz of Lots 104-107, 116-119. There aze sufficient inlets
at the reaz of the lots as shown.
16. There is no Swale for Lots 91-99. This will sheet flow to the ditch.
17. Drainage swales and storm sewers aze being shown along the tree
preservation azea.
18. A drainage Swale is shown in front of the tree preservation easement as stated
above.
9940 Allisonville Road • Fishers, Indiana 46038-2005 • (317) 849-5935 • I-800-728-6917 • FAX: (317) 849-5942
19. Structure 84B was relocated as requested.
20. The design slopes were shown with the swale from Structures 84B to 90 (also
Sheet C201).
21. Easement label discrepancies were corrected.
22. The neck downs aze not shown to be in sag locations.
23. On all swales, the slopes were labeled.
24. The termination ofthe-sanitary sewer at the northeast comer was labeled as
Existing Structure #.
25. The length, size and slope of the pipe from Structure 70 to 69 was shown.
26. The reaz yards of hots 85-90 will sheet flow to the creek. The azea between
the reaz property lines and lake # 3 will sheet flow from the reaz of the lots to
the creek.
27. The lake elevation of lake # 3 was revised. Peak elevation and emergency
spilling details were added.
28. On Section "A-A", the arrow nose points to the existing grade line.
29. The emergency detail for the lake is now shown.
30. The pad elevation for Lot 85 was revised. Lots 85 and 86 are proposed to
have basements, but not walkout basements. The basements will be set at the
appropriate elevation from the MFPG which is shown on the plan as a
minimum opening elevation.
31. MFPG for Lots 85-90 was shown in the legend. This elevation was noted
that no building opening (windows, window wells, doors, etc.) will be
allowed this elevation.
Sheet C202-Tree Removal Plan
32. This sheet now reflects what trees will be removed and which trees will
remain.
Sheet C300-Erosion Control Plan
33. The erosion control layer was omitted on the prior submittal. The erosion
control is now shown.
Sheet C400, C401, C402-Street Plan and Profiles, Intersection Details
34. The widths of the knockdowns were dimensional as requested.
35. The location of the knockdowns were dimensional for location purposes.
Sheet C403-Entrance Detail
36. This sheet was labeled as Hazel Dell Parkway Entrance Detail.
Sheet C501, C600-Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer Plan and Profiles
37. All concrete cradles were change to the stone cradles.
-~
Sheet C601-Storm Sewer Plan and Profile
38. The velocity was shown for the pipe run between Structure 81 and 76.
39. The pipes at the right hand portions of the sheet were revised from 15" pipes
to 12" pipes. The slopes were increased.
Sheet C700-Water Plan
40. The length of the water laterals were shown as requested.
Sheet C802-Construction Details
41. On the pavement cross-section, the 9" #53 stone was shown instead of 5" #53
and 4" #2.
42. The sidewalk was shown as 5 foot in width.
If you have any further questions, please feel to call me at (317) 577-3410.
Very truly yours,
STOEPPELWERTH &
ASSOCIATES, INC. ~~ / n
G'" ~~~~/`/~/
William A. Bryant
Cc: Tim Walter
Angelina Butler
S:/4340552/Agency
CONSULTING ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS
David J. Stoeppelwerth, P.E.. P.L..S.
Prcsideni. QF..0.
Department of Community Services
1 Civic Square
Carmel, Indiana 46032
Attention: Angelina Butler
Curtis C. Huff. P.L.S.
VicrYresidem. CD.O_
December 19; 2003
R.M. Swcppclwenh, P.E., P.L.S. '
Presidan Emeeim_e
2
.1 `~' i~
~~}~~ .
~ C f II~EO ~`
~ pF ~~ ~ ,
p ~0 2[1/13
OOCS
r
Ol' ~,~ ~.
~TT~ ±
~~_~
Re: 'Cherry Creek Estates, Section 2
134-03-SP
Dear Ms. Butler:
Please find enclosed one set of Construction Plans with Plat and supporting documents
which were revised per a comment letter dated September 5, 2003. Those comments were
addressed as follows:
Section 2 Plat
1. The surveyor signature and date will be added prior to recording_
2. A copy of all review letters are enclosed as requested.
3. The lake elevation for.the -100 year flood and bottom "were added. '
4. The instrument, PC, and slide numbers were filled in.
5: 'The location map .was revised to be more specific.
6. The appropriate docket numbers were added to the Plat as requested.
7. T.P.E. was added to the legend..
Construction Plans
8. A copy of the commitments recorded from Docket No. 152-02PP will be provided by
the developer.
9. A landscape plan was added to the Construction Set.
10. A signage plan was added to the Construction Set.
9940 Allisonville Road • Fishers, Indiana 46038-2005 • (317) 849-5935• I-800-728-6917 • FAX: (317) 849-5942
. ... ' ~
11. A lighting plan was added to the Construction Set.
12. The pedestrian path is shown and labeled on the Site Development Plan.
If you have any. further questions, please feel free to call me at (317) 577-3410.
Very truly yours,
Co: T'm Walter
STOEPPE~L~WERTH & SSOCIATES, INC.
G~~~~'"" //,j/~f
William A. Bryant .
5:/4340552/Agency
CONSULTING ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS
David 1 Stoeppelwerth, P.E., P.L.S. Curtis C Huff, P.L.S.
Presidem, C.E.O. Vice-Presidem, C.O.O.
Hanulton County Surveyor
One Hamilton Squaze
Noblesville, Indiana 46060
Attention: Greg Hoyes
December 19, 2003
Re: Cherry Creek Estates, Section 2
Deat Mr. Hoyes:
RECEIVED
DEC 23 20G3
DOCS
Please find enclosed one set of Construction Plans which were revised per a comment letter
dated October 28, 2003. Those comments were addressed as follows:
1. Acknowledge that this project falls within the corporate limits of the City of Carmel.
2- The storm sewer design was coordinated with the City of Carmel and discussed in a
meeting with you.
3. The boundary was relocated to not include the reconstruction of the Vestal Regulated
Drain at this time.
4. The developer's fax number was added to the cover sheet.
5. The common area was labeled to also be a drainage easement.
6. The building pads for Lots 85 and 86 aze 2 feet above the 100 year flood elevation of the
proposed lake.
7. The top of the bank was labeled for the proposed lake #3 as requested.
8. The emergency spill was for lake #3 was shown along with details.
9. The Hamilton County Surveyor's Regulated Drain standazds for a detention lake and the
appropriate outlet was used.
10. The site overflow will be extended or shortened once the reconstruction of the Vestal
Regulated Drain is completed with Section 4.
1 L The HCSO Detail O-5 for the outlet into the Vestal Regulated Drain along with rip-rap
on both sides of the creek per detail O-4.
12. The reaz yazd grades were checked at the reaz of Lots 103-107 and 116-120. The Swale
slopes were also labeled.
13. SSD to each lot were shown on the Site Development Plan.
14. The 100 yeaz elevation of the Vestal Regulated Drain was shown.
15. The adjacent landowners were labeled on the Site Development Plan.
16. A landscape plan was added to the Construction Set.
17. The Erosion Control Plan was revised with the appropriate items shown.
18. HCSO Detail D-12 was added to the plans. This is shown to be added for Structure #70.
R.M. Stoepp¢Iwerth, P.S., P.L.S.
Presidem Emeritus
9940 Allisonville Road • Fishers, Indiana 46038-2005 • (317) 849-5935 • I-800-728-6917 • FAX: (317) 849-5942
19. Acknowledge that additional comments may be warranted.
If you have any further questions, please feel free to call me at (317) 577-3410.
Very truly yours,
STOEP~~~CLATES, INC.
William A. Bryant
Cc: Tim Walter
Angelina Butler
S:/4340552/Agenry
CONSULTING ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS
David 1. S[oeppelwerth, P.E., P.L.S. Curtis C. Huff, P.L.S.
Presitle~6 GE.O. Vice-Presideor, C.O.O.
December 19, 2003
Hamilton County Soil & Water
1108 South Ninth Street
Noblesville, Indiana 46060
Attention: John South
R.M. Stoeppelwerth, P.E., P.L.S.
Presideor Emeriws
2f ~,
~ ~
~ ~?~
~" pti~ ~~GS f'~
P?l ^ y,
~ ~,`:
Re: Cherry Creek Estates, Section 2
Deaz Mr. South:
Please find enclosed one set of Construction Plans which were revised per a comment
letter received on October 20, 2003. These comments were addressed as follows:
2C. The floodways were listed in the project data on sheet C301.
2B. All soils were noted on the Erosion Control Sheets per this Section.
4A. Sequence for each measwe was modified for this Section.
4C. The silt fence was removed and not extended to Lot 99. A diversion Swale is now
shown. The sediment basin has dimensioned elevation and contours shown. Elevation for
the outlet structure was added.
4G. Inlet protection for Structure 90 was shown. Inlet protection will be provided for
Structures 91 and 92. The lake is specified to be lined. The inlet was not added at the reaz
of Lot 119.
If you have any further questions, please feel free to call me at (317) 577-3410.
Very truly yours,
STOEPPE~L~W/ER~TH & SS CIATES, INC.
G~9~E~~~i't-' I"
William A. Bryant
Cc: Tim Walter
Angelina Butler
5:/4340552/Agency
9940 AIlisonville Road • Fishers, Indiana 46038-2005 • (317) 849-5935 • I-B00-728-6917 • FAX: (317) 649-5942
CONSULTING ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS
Carmel City Utilities
130 First Avenue Southwest
Carmel, Indiana 46032
Attention: Paul Pace
December 19, 2003
R.M. Stoevoelwerth, P.E., P.L.S.
RE~~ED
DEC i3 2663
pOCS
Re: Cherry Creek Estates, Section 2
Deaz Mr. Pace:
Please find enclosed three copies of the Utility Prints which were revised per a comment
letter dated September 9, 2003. Those comments were addressed as follows:
Sewer Corrections
I. All concrete cradles were revised to be granulaz backfill cradles.
2. Manholes were shown to be coated.
Water Corrections
1. No blow offs aze shown to be installed. The water is to be connected to an existing
main in Delawaze Trace.
2. Two inline valves were added on each side of the Tee, at the intersection of Kickapoo
and Osage.
3. Three copies of the revised plans aze enclosed.
If you have any further questions, please feel free to call me at (317) 577-3410.
Very truly yours,
STOEPPELWERTH & CIATES, INC.
~~~~
William A. Bryant
Co: Tim Walter
Angelina Butler
5:/4340552/Agency
9940 Allisonville Road • Fishers, Indiana 46038-2005 • (317) 849-5935 • 1-600-728-6917 • FAX: (317) 849-5942
David ]. Stoeppelwcrth, P.E., P.L.S. Curtis C. Huff, P.L.S.
Presitlrnt C.E.O. ~ Yu-Presitlrnt C.O.O.
OCT 26 '03 04~41PM
P.1/2
- a
1_ ',. ,.
r:~ l ~ '^
~'~ l.(r~
:r%i~
i:__.
p 5 LT
October 28, 2003 Gj `~ x~ p~
Stoeppelwerth & Associates, Inc. ~ ~~ P7 R~ \0.~~ Cz
Attn: Bill Bryant ~ ~ `~-"
9940 Allisonville Road ~ ~ ~~' ~pCs
Fishers, IN 46038-2005
VIA FACSIMILE: 849-5942 '~~.
12e: ~ hee~r-yCreel%Estates,:Section:b
Deaz Mr. Bryant:
We have reviewed the construction plans and sewndary plat submitted to the Hamilton
County Surveyor's Office on September 2, 2003 for this project and have the following
comments:
1. Phis proposed project falls within the corporate limits of the City of Carmel.
2. Please coordinate the storm sewer design with both the City of Carmel and this
office.
3. Please submit revised plans to this office, per the agreement to move the extents
of this project west and not include the reconstruction of the Vestal Regulated
Drain at this time,
4. Please add the developer's fax number to the cover sheet.
5. Label the common azea and make it drainage easement also.
6. Raise building pads 85 and 86 to 2 feet about the 100 year flood elevation of the
proposed lake. This is required per Hamilton County Ordinance 4-26-99-C.
7. Label top of bank for proposed lake #3.
.7rrrlton C. `141nrrl, Si:rvryor Suite r8F
'P(onP (jt7777G-d4a5 Onr.7lnmihon Cmmry Stpmrr
•To.r (jil) 77G'9Gx8 .7Voblesvillr, Ltdinna ¢GOGu•xx3o
OCT 28 '03 04~43PM P.2i2
8. Show and label an emergency spill way for proposed lake #3.
9. Please include one of the Hamilton County Surveyor's Office Regulated Drain
Standards for a detention lake, and the appropriate standard for the outlet used
with that lake option.
10. The site outflow pipe may need extended or shortened once the reconstruction of
the Vestal Regulated Drain is completed with section 4.
l 1. Include HCSO Detail O-S for the outlet into the Vestal Regulated Drain and show
rip-rap on both sides of the creek per detail 0-4.
12. The rear yard drainage swale behind lots 103-107 and 116-120 appears that is will
hold water about the north east comer of lot 119 and other spots. Please review
the fall on the proposed Swale.
13, Hamilton County Surveyor's Office recommends that SSD studs to each lot are
shown on the site development plans.
14. Show the 100 year flood elevation of the Vestal Regulated Drain.
15. Show adjacent landowners on the construction plans.
16. Please submit a landscape plan.
17. The submitted erosion control plans showed no information. Please show erosion
control with the next submittal.
18. Please include HCSO Detail D-12 and show a debris guard on structure #70.
19. Please note the additional comments may be warranted at a later date.
Should you have any questions, I can be reached at 317-776-8495.
Sin~ce(re~ly,
- I U~~
Greg Haycs
Plan Reviewer
Cc; Jon Dobosiewicz -Carmel DOCD
Dick Hill -Carmel Engineering
Steve Broermann - HCHD
John South - HCSWCD
Tim Walter -Platinum Properties
O
;~
Platinum
October 27, 2003
Mr. Dick Hill
Department of Engineering
City of Carmel
One Civic Square
Carmel, IN 46032
,s~.
..-
~~ r. ~\
l ,~
Gil ~ ~ :,,'
~ ~j ,~
~` ,~~,a
~ ~~
~~ )~J
~.
r~.
~~' '
RE: Cherry~Creek~Estates~Entryx3Walf.C,onstructio`n
Dear Mr. Hill:
We would like to address the concerns regarding the revised entry way plan for Cherry Creek Estates as
expressed by your Department in a letter dated October 13, 2003. First, we intend to complete this work in
a fashion that will showcase and beautify the entry to our subdivision as well as the overall landscape
appeal for Hazel Dell Parkway and Cherry Creek Soulevartl. Second, we in no way intend to create a
hazardous condition for the public, and to the contrary, we want a safe and attractive landscape and
hardscape for all passers by to enjoy. With that said, the following will address more specifically your
concerns:
The attached drawing depicts revised dimensions showing separation between the right-of-way
and the face of the stone walls. Based on previous a-mail correspondence with your office we
have in all cases provided a minimum separation of 12". Along Hazel Dell Parkway, there will be a
minimum of 18" separation. The only exception to this rule is along the south side of Cherry Creek
Boulevard where the path is actually installed 1' inside the right-of-way. In that case the wall is at
the edge of the right-of-way leaving a 12" separation to the path.
We are not asking for any additional approvals for walls in the median, The landscape plans
approved at the Primary Plat and Construction Plan approval stage depicted a large column sign
at the west end of the median and a shorter wall perpendicular to the median at the east end of
the walls on the north and south sides of Cherry Creek Boulevard. The other walls shown in the
median on the drawings are actually "bed edges" that will be flush with the top of curb. The
placement of all of the stones in the median is to give the appearance that the wall was there first,
and we cut through it to install the road.
Again, we are not asking for any additional approvals that were not already granted during the
Primary Plat and Construction Plan approval stage. Placement of trees in the medians was a
requirement by the Urban Forester and Plan Commission to create continuity with Hazel Dell
Parkway.
317 818 2900 • 317 818 2910 fax
9551 Delegates Rowe Indianapolis, IN 46240
October 27, 2003
Page 2
We, as the developer and as the manager of the Homeowners Association, would in no way
expect the City of Carmel to take responsibility for drainage or any other issues for that matter that
are in common areas unless otherwise related to public improvements within such common area.
Thank you for your attention. I hope that this will clear up any confusion created by the revisions that were
made to our entry way plan. Please feel free to call ore-mail if you have any additional concerns.
Sincerely,
,CGrP~`~~
Timothy J. Walter, P.E.
Project Manager
Enclosures (1)
Cc: Paul Rioux, Platinum Properties.
Eric Simons, Platinum Properties.
Jon Dobosiewicz, Depatment of Community Services.
Scott Brewer, Urban Forester.
File.
~ ~~~~
a-~~-E
~r ~,z~
~~ I i2=/err TILL '
I ~~
1
1~+~L~- u)1 ~~ CtSN'a7~tJL'-'~~
~R~tiJ nl 1 ~ CJ 4f1~- A~a~.. IZ'y.12' % y s
~ 'j.
i•
t ~!-
v
;,
.a
~,~ \• ~ t
ii
~8n-r~ ~~
. x
,~
~~,
~
,
- - _---
_ _ M
;,
~ - ~ -~'
~
. t
.~ `
~~,, _~
~ T
K
_ - '-~
~~
j-~J5r1 W tT~t Cv2P,
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
TECHNICAL REVIEW AND COMMENT
Hamilton County Soil and Water Conservation District
1108 South 9'h Street, Noblesville IN 46060
Ph- 317-773-1432 or Email at john-south(a,iaswcd.orS
PROJECT NAME: Cherr"uiCreek Et'~sta~te"s~Sa~
SUBMITTED BY: Platinum Development Stoeppelwerth & Associates
C/O Tim Walters 9940 Allisonville Road
9551 Delegates Row Fishers, IN 46038-2005
Indianapolis, IN 46240
317-818-2900
REVIEWED BY: John B. South P.E.
Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control
PLAN REVIEW DATE: OCTOBER 20, 2003 ACREAGE: 25 ACRES
:LOCATION: East side of Hazel Dell Road at Cherry Tree Road
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sec. 22
TOWNSHIP: 18N RANGE: 4E CIVIL TOWNSHIP: Clay
SOIL SURVEY MAP SHEET: 45
The technkal review and comments are intended to evaluate the completeness of the erosion and sediment control plan for the
project. The erosion and sediment control plan submitted was not reviewed jar the adequacy of the engineering design. All
practices included in the plan, as well as those recommended in the comments should be evaluated us to their feasibility by a
qualified individual with structural practices designed 6y a yua[ified engineer. The plan has not been reviewed for local, state,
or federal permits that may be required !o proceed with this project. Additional information, including design calculations mqy
be requested to further evaluate the erosion and sediment control plan.
The erosion and sediment control plan has been reviewed and it has been determined that the plan:
Satisfies the minimum requirements and intent of 3271AC IS-5 (Rule 5). Notification will be forwarded to the
Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
X Does not satisfy the minimum requirements and intent of 3271AC IS-5 (Rule 5); deficiencies are noted in the
checklist and in the comments section. Deficiencies constitute potential violations of the rule and must be
adequately addressed for compliance. The information necessary to satisfy the deficiencies must be submitted:
Proper implementation of the erosion and sediment control plan and inspections of the construction site by the developer or a
representative are necessary to minimise off-site sedimentation. Tlae deve/oper.rhould be aware that unforeseen construction
activities and weather conditions might affect the performance of a practice or the erosion and sediment control plan. The plan
must be a flexible document, with provisions to mod fy or snhstitute practices as necessary.
Revised 4 / 97
PROJECT: Cherry Creek Estates Sec. 2
Page 2 of 3
ARE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED ON THE PLANS ?
(All Plans Must Include Appropriate Legends, Scales, and North Arrow)
(Items that are Not Applicable to this Project are designated by NA)
Yes No PROJECT INFORMATION
X 1 A Project Location Map (Show project in relation to other areas of the county)
X 1B Narrative Describing the Nature and Purpose of the Project
X 1C Location of Planned and/or Existing Roads, Utilities, Structures, Highways, etc.
x 1 D Lot and/or Building Locations
x 1 E Landuse of Adjacent Areas
(Show the Entire Upstream Watershed and ddjacent Areas Wiihin 500 Feet ojthe Property Lines)
Yes No TOPOGRAPHIC, DRAINAGE, AND GENERAL SITE FEATURES
X 2A Existing Vegetation (/dentify and Delineate )
x 2B Location and Name of All Wetlands, Lakes and Water Courses On and Adjacent to the Site
x 2C 100 Year Floodplains, Floodway Fringes, and Floodways (Note if None)
X 2D Soils Information (lf hydric soils are present, it is the responsibility of the owner/developer to
investigate the existence of wetlands and [a obtain permits from [he appropriate government agencies.)
X 2E Existing and Planned Contours at an Interval Appropriate to Indicate Drainage Patterns
X 2F Locations of Specific Points Where Stormwater Discharge Will Leave the Site
X 2G Identify All Receiving Waters (lfDischarge is to a Separate Municipal Storrn Sewer, Identify the
Name of the Municipal Operator and the Ultimate Receiving Water)
X 2H Potential Areas Where Storm water May Enter Groundwater (Note ijNone)
x 21 Location of Stormwater System (/nchRde Culverts, Storm Sewers, Channels, and Scales)
Yes No LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES
X 3A Location and Approximate llimensions of All Disturbed Areas [i. e., Construction Limhs]
(Areas Where vegetative Cover Will Be Preserved Should be Clearly Uesignated)
X 3B Soil Stockpiles and or Borrow Areas (Show Locations or Note if None)
Yes No EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES
x 4A Sequence of When Each Measure Will Be Implemented (Relative ro Earth Disturbing ilctivities)
x 4B Monitoring and Maintenance Guidelines for Each Measure
X 4C Perimeter Sediment Control Measures (Location, Construction Detail, Uimensions, and Specifications)
X 4D T¢mporary Seeding (Specifications; /ncluding Seed Mix, Fertilizer, Lime, and Mulch Rates)
x 4E Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Measures
(Location, Construction Uetad, Dimensions, and Specifications)
x 4F Permanent Erosion and Sediment Control Measures
(Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications)
X 4G Storm Drain Inlet Protection (Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications)
X 4H Stormwater Outlet Protection (Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications)
X 4I Stable Construction Entrance (Location, Construction Detail, Uimensions, and Specifications)
x 4J Erosion and Sediment Control on Individual Building Lots (Specifications)
X 4K Permanent Seeding (Specifications; /ncluding Seed Mix, Fertili=er, Lime, and M¢dch Rates)
Revised 4 / 97
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
TECHNICAL REVIEW
COMMENTS
PROJECT: Cherry Creek Estates Sec. lA & 1B
Page 3 of 3
Nn(e: All erosion and sediment con[rol measures s/eown nn the plnns and referenced in t/~is review nmst meet the resign
criteria, standards, and specifrca(ions ou!lined in the "/ndiana Handbook for Erns(nn Cnn(rol in Developing Areas "front the
Gtd/ana Department of Natural Resources, Division nf.Soil Cnnservntion or similar Guidance Documents.
2C. No floodways listed in the Project data on Sheet C301.
2D. Crosby soil is not mapped in this section. Westland soil is hydric and Sleeth has the potential for
Westland inclusions. Please list all the soils in this section.
4A. Sequence is from Sec 1. Please revise.
4C. Recommend extending the silt fence to lot 99. Tempoary seed common area north of lots 99- 99. The
sediment basin shown on sheet C300 needs dimensions, elevations and proposed contours. Elevations are
needed for the outlet structure. The top of mound is proposed at 764. This is 2' higher than surrounding
grades. Please provide calculations for the sediment basin design.
4G. inlet protection is needed for Str#90. Street inlets 91 & 92 discharge offsite. An inlet protection practice
that fits into the catch basin is recommended. See the attached list of product manufactures.
Recommend specifications for lining the lakes. Failure of the liner will cost the homeowners considerable
expense.
Is an inlet needed at the rear of lot 119?
Cc: Carmel DOCS
I-Ia. Co. Surveyor
File
e
~ rM
~'~ wl 4/~
Co/G //6
. a~-Y.~
• •
Co~
City of Carmel
VIA FAX: 849-5942
Original by mail
September 5, 2003
William Bryant
Stoeppelwerth & Associates, Inc.
9940 Allisonville Road
Fishers, IN 46038
RE: Cherry Creek Estates, Section 2 -Secondary Plat Application
Dear Mr. Bryant:
This letter is in response to your Secondary Plat Application for Cherry Creek Estates, Section 2. This
is a preliminary letter to let you begin on revisions. Additional comments will be made by members at the
TAC Meeting on September 17. Please complete the following items after you have received additional
comments at the TAC Meeting.
Cection 2 Plat
1. Add registered surveyor's signature and date.
2. Forward a copy of the final review letters from the following agencies:
Carmel Engineering, Scott Brewer (Urban Forester), and John South (Soil and Water).
3. Add lake elevation for 100-yr flood and bottom to plat.
4. Fill in blanks for instrument, PC, and slide numbers.
5. Please make location map more specific, labeling more roads.
6. Please place docketnumbers on plat: 152-02 PP and 134-03 SP
7. Please Add T.P.E. to legend.
8. Please provide a copy of commitments recorded from Docket No.152-02 PP.
9. Please provide a landscape plan.
10. Please provide a subdivision signage plan.
11. Please provide a lighting plan.
12. Please show the pedestrian path throughout site.
If you have any questions or if I may be of assistance, please feel free to call.
Sincerely,
Angelina Butler
Planning Administrator
Cherry Creek EstatesSec2-SP1
Page 1
ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571-2417
One Civic Square
Cannel, IN 4`A32
(317) 571-2417
Fa:c (317) 57t-2426
LrT7
,.o; YVIv~ Pvya~t~.
From: /:/S. ~U~~
Fax ~~ -l - 5~4 Z Pages: Z.
Phone: Date: ~ ' ~ ' ~ 3
Re: e.. vl.~.~1L~ CC;
Q Urgent ^ For Review ^ Please Comment ^ Please Reply Q Please Recycle
City of Carmel
Department of Community Services
One Civic Square
Carmel, IN 46032
317-571-2417
Fax: 317-571-2426
FACSIMILE TELECOPY COVER LETTER
DATE: September 5, 2003
TO: Dennis Olmstead
FAX: 849-5942
FROM: Pam
Attached hereto are 9 pages, including this cover letter, for facsimile
transmission. Should you experience any problem in the receipt of these pages,
please call 317/571/2417 and ask for Pam.
NOTES: TAC Agenda with Calendar and list of TAC Members. Each TAC
member will need a full size copy of your project.
Please call if you have any questions.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The materials enclosed with this facsimile transmission are private
and confidential and are the property of the sender. The information contained in the material is
privileged and is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) named above. If you are
not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution or the
taking of any action in reliance on the contents o/this [elecopied information is strictly prohibited. I/
you have received this facsimile transmission in error, please immediately notify us by telephone to
arrange for Tatum of the forwarded documents to us.
i
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
STOEPPELWERTH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
9940 Allisonville Road
Fishers, Indiana 46038-2005
Phone (317) 849-5935
FAX (317) 849-5942
DATE:
August 29, 2003
TO: Department of Community Services
One Civic Square
Carmel, Indiana 46032
ATTENTION: Jon Dobosiewicz
RE: Cherry Creek Estates, Section 2
JOB NUMBER: 4340552
~,~;.1-! ~ ~ ~
ti ~,
~~ r ~ ~.- `~
(`, , RECFIVED
j_; lUG 29 ~Utr;i
'~ cots
WE ARE SENDING YOU [ ] UPS [ ] Courier [ ] Other: Deliver
COPIES SHEET
NO. DESCRIPTION
2 Sets Construction Plans with Plat
1 Secondary Plat Application
I Subdivision Agreement
1 Transmittals to Agencies
I Set Storm Calculations
I Set Recorded Covenants
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
I I For Approval
I X I For Your Use
REMARKS:
X J As Requested
I I
William A. Bryant
I I For Review and Comment
Cc: Tim Walter
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
STOEPPELWERTH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
9940 Allisonville Road
Fishers, Indiana 46038-2005
Phone (377)849-5935
FAX (317) 849-5942
DATE: August 29, 2003
TO: Carmel City Utilities
130 First Avenue SW
Carmel, Indiana 46032
ATTENTION: John Duffy
RE: Cherry Creek Estates, Section 2
WE ARE SENDING YOU ~ ~' ] UPS ~ ] Courier [ ~ Other:
~.___~
~" {
REC ~ ~~,
- ~.
1!lS 29 2D0~
~~CS
~~
JOB NUMBER: 4340552
COPIES SHEET
NO. DESCRIPTION
l Set Construction Plans with Plat
1 Allocation Certification Lefler
1 Permit Application
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
I ~ For Approval
I X I For Your Use
REMARKS:
I X I As Requested
I I
William A. Bryant
I I For Review and Comment
Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz
Tim Walter
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
STOEPPELWERTH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
9940 Allisonville Road
Fishers, Indiana 46038-2005
Phone (317)849-5935
FAX (317) 849-5942
DATE:
August 29, 2003
JOB NUMBER: 4340552
TO: Hamilton County Surveyor
One Hamilton County Square
Noblesville, Indiana 46060
ATTENTION: Jerry Liston
RE: Cherry Creek Estates, Section 2
WE ARE SENDING YOU [ ~' ] UPS ~ ~ Couricr ~ ] Othcr:
COPIES SHEET
NO. DESCRIPTION
1 Set Construction Plans with Plat
1 Set Storm Computations
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
~ X ~ For Approval I X ~ As Requested ~ ~ For Review and Comment
~ X ~ For Your Usc ~ ~
REMARKS:
William A. Bryant
Cc: Jon Dobasiewicz
Tim Walter
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
STOEPPELWERTH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
9940 Allisonville Road
Fishers, Indiana 46038-2005
Phone (317) 849-5935
FAX (317) 849-5942
DATE: August 29, 2003
TO: City of Carmel
City Engineer
One Civic Square
Carmel, Indiana 46032
ATTENTION: Kate Weese/Dick Hill
RE: Cherry Creek Estates, Section 2
JOB NUMBER: 4340552
WE ARE SENDING YOU [ ] urs [ ] courier [ ] omen: Deliver
COPIES SHEET
NO. DESCRIPTION
I Set Construction Plans with Plat
1 Set Storm Computations
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
~ X ~ For Approval
~ X ~ For Your Use
REMARKS:
~ X J As Requested ~ ~ For Review and Comment
~ ~
William A. Bryant
Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz
Tim Walter
• i
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
STOEPPELWERTH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
9940 Allisonville Road
Fishers, Indiana 46038-2005
Phone (317) 849-5935
FAX (317) 849-5942
DATE: August 29, 2003
TO: Carmel City Utilities
130 First Avenue SW
Carmel, Indiana 46032
ATTENTION: Paul Pace
RE: Cherry Creek Estates, Section 2
WE ARE SENDING YOU ~ X ~ UPS [ ] Courier [ ] Other:
JOB NUMBER: 43405S2
COPIES SHEET DESCRIPTION
NO.
1 Set Construction Plans with Plat
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
[ X ] For Approval ( X ] As Requested
[ X ] For Your Use [ J
REMARKS:
[ J For Review and Comment
William A. Bryant
Cc: Tim Walter
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
STOEPPELWERTH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
9940 Allisonville Road
Fishers, Indiana 46038-2005
Phone (317)849-5935
FAX (317) 849-5942
DATE: August 29, 2003 JOB NUMBER: 4340552
TO: SBC
5858 North College Avenue
Indianapolis, Indiana 46220
ATTENTION: Justin Condon
RE: Cherry Creek Estates, Section 2
WE ARE SENDING YOU [ X ] UPS [ ] Courier [ ] Other:
COPIES SHEET DESCRIPTION
NO.
I Set Construction Plans with Plat
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
[ X) For Approval [ X ] As Requested
[ X ] For Your Use [ ~
r
REMARKS:
[ ]For Review and Comment
William A. Bryant
Cc: Tim Walter
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
STOEPPELWERTH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
9940 Allisonville Road
Fishers, Indiana 46038-2005
Phone (317)849-5935
FAX (317) 849-5942
DATE:
August 29, 2003
JOB NUMBER: 4340552
TO: Time Warner
3030 Roosevelt Avenue
Indianapolis, Indiana 46218
ATTENTION: Jeff Farmer
RE: Cherry Creek Estates, Section 2
WE ARE SENDING YOU [ ~' ] UPS [ ] Courier [ ] Other:
COPIES SHEET DESCRIPTION
NO.
1 Set Construction Plans with Plat
TIIESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
[ X ] For Approval 1 X ] As Requested
~ X ] For Your Use i
s
REMARKS:
[ ]For Review and Comment
William A. Bryant
Cc: Tim Walter
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
STOEPPELWERTH & ASSOCIATES,'INC.
9940 Allisonville Road
Fishers, Indiana 46038-2005
Phone (317)849-5935
FAX (3t7) 849-5942
DATE: August29, 2003 JOB NUMBER: 43405S2
TO: Hamilton County Local Emergency
1717 Pleasant Street
Suite 100
Noblesville; Indiana 46060
ATTENTION: Robert Hendricks
RE: Cherry Creek Estates, Section 2
WE ARE SENDING YOU [ X ] UPS [ ] Courier [ ] Other:
COPIES SHEET DESCRIPTION
NO.
1 Set Construction Plans with Plat
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
[ X) For Approval ~ X ~ As Requested
[ X J For Your Use ~ ]
REMARKS:
[ ]For Review and Comment
William A. Bryant
Cc: Tim Walter
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
STOEPPELWERTH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
9940 Allisonville Road
Fishers, Indiana 46038-2005
Phone (317)849-5935
FAX (317) 849-5942
DATE: August 29, 2003
TO: Hamilton County Health Department
One Hamilton County Square
Suite 30
Noblesville, Indiana 46060
ATTENTION: Jason Lemaster
RE: Cherry Creek Estates, Secfion 2
WE ARE SENDING YOU [ X ] UPS [ ] Courier [ ] Other:
JOB NUMBER: 4340552
COPIES SHEET DESCRIPTION
NO.
1 Set Construction Plans with Plat
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
[ X ~ For Approval [ X ] As Requested
[ X ] For Your Use [ J
REMARKS:
William A. Bryant
[ J For Review and Comment
Cc: Tim Walter
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
STOEPPELWERTH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
9940 Allisonville Road
Fishers, Indiana 46038-2005
Phone (317)849-5935
FAX (317) 849-5942
DATE: August 29, 2003 JOB NUMBER: 4340552
TO: Jones & Henry
2420 North Coliseum Boulevard
Fort Wayne, Indiana 46805
ATTENTION: Brian Houghton
RE: Cherry Creek Estates, Section 2
WE ARE SENDING YOU [ X ] UPS [ ] Courier [ ] Other:
COPIES SHEET DESCRIPTION
NO.
I Set Construction Plans with Plat
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
[ X ] For Approval [ X J As Requested
[ X J For Your Use [ ]
REMARKS:
[ ]For Review and Comment
William A. Bryant
Cc: Tim Walter
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
STOEPPELWERTH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
9940 Allisonville Road
Fishers, Indiana 46038-2005
Phone (317)849-5935
FAX (317) 849-5942
DATE: August 29, 2003
TO: Office of Police Chief
Three Civic Square
Carmel, Indiana 46032
ATTENTION: Michael Fogarty
RE: Cherry Creek Estates, Section 2
WE ARE SENDING YOU [ X ] UPS [ ] Courier [ ] Other:
JOB NUMBER: 4340552
COPIES SHEET DESCRIPTION
NO.
I Set Construction Plans with Plat
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
[ X ] For Approval 1 X ~ As Requested
( X ] For Your Use [
REMARKS:
[ J For Review and Comment
William A. Bryant
Cc: Tim Walter
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
STOEPPELWERTH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
9940 Allisonville Road
Fishers, Indiana 46038-2005
Phone (317) 849-5935
FAX (317) 849-5942
DATE: August 29, 2003 JOB NUMBER: 4340552
TO: Carmel Postmaster
275 Medical Drive
Carmel, Indiana 46032
ATTENTION: Tom Skolak
RE: Cherry Creek Estates, Section 2
WE ARE SENDING YOU [ ]UPS [ ] Courier [ ] Omer:
COPIES SHEET DESCRIPTION
NO.
1 Set Construction Plans with Plat
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
[ X ] For Approval [ X ] As Requested
[ X ] For Your Use [ ]
REMARKS:
[ ]For Review and Comment
William A. Bryant
Cc: Tim Walter
•
LETTER OF' TRANSMITTAL
STOEPPELWERTH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
9940 Allisonville Road
Fishers,lndiana 46038-2005
Phone (317)849-5935
FAX (317) 849-5942
DATE: August 29, 2003 JOB NUMBER: 43405S2
TO: Vectren Energy
15900 Allisonville Road
Noblesville, Indiana 46060
ATTENTION: Chuck Shupperd
RE: Cherry Creek Estates, Section 2
R'E ARE SENDING YOU [ X ] UPS [ ] Courier [ ] Other:
COPIES SHEET DESCRIPTION
NO.
1 Set Construction Plans with Plat
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
[ X ] For Approval [ X ] As Requested
[ X ] For Your Use [ ]
s
REMARKS:
[ J For Review and Comment
William A. Bryant
Cc: Tim Walter
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
ST®EPPELWERTH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
9940 Allisonville Road
Fishers, Indiana 46038-2005
Phone (317)849-5935
FAX (317) 849-5942
DATE: August 29, 2003
TO: Cinergy PSI
1441 South Gilford
Carmel, Indiana 46032
ATTENTION: Dean Groves
RE: Cherry Creek Estates, Section 2
WE ARE SENDING YOU [ ~' ] UPS [ ] Courier [ ] Other:
JOB NUMBER: 4340552
COPIES SHEET DESCRIPTION
NO.
1 Set Construction Plans with Plat
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
[ X ] For Approval ~ X J As Requested
~ X ] For Your Use [ ]
REMARKS:
[ ]For Review and Comment
William A. Bryant
Cc: Tim Walter
•
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
STOEPPELWERTH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
9940 Allisonville Road
Fishers, Indiana 46038-2005
Phone (317) 849-5935
FAX (3l7) 849-5942
DATE: August 29, 2003
TO: Carmel Clay Parks Department
1055 Third Avenue SW
Carmel, Indiana 46032
ATTENTION: Todd Snyder
RE: Cherry Creek Estates, Section 2
WE ARE SENDING YOU [ ~' ] UPS [ ] Courier [ ] Other:
JOB NUMBER: 43405S2
COPIES SHEET DESCRIPTION
NO.
1 Set Construction Plans with Plat
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
[ X J For Approval ~ X ] As Requested
[ X ] For Your Use ~ ]
REMARKS:
[ ]For Review and Comment
William A. Bryant
Cc: Tim Walter
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
STOEPPELWERTH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
9940 Allisonville Road
Fishers, Indiana 46038-2005
Phone (317) 849-5935
FAX (317) 849-5942
DATE: August 29, 2003 JOB NUMBER: 43405S2
TO: Carmel Clay Schools
5185 East 131~t Street
Carmel, Indiana 46033
ATTENTION: Ron Farrand
RE: Cherry Creek Estates, Section 2
WE ARE SENDING YOU [ X ] UPS [ ] Courier [ ] Othcr:
COPIES SHEET DESCRIPTION
NO:
1 Set Construction Plans with Plat
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
[ X J For Approval [ X l As Requested
~ X ] For Your Use ~ ]
r
REMARKS:
~ ]For Review and Comment
William A. Bryant
Cc: Tim Walter
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
STOEPPELWERTH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
9940 Allisonville Road
Fishers, Indiana 46038-2005
Phone (317)849-5935
FAX (317) 849-5942
DATE: August 29, 2003
TO: Office of Fire Chief
2 Carmel Civic Square
Carmel, Indiana 46032
ATTENTION: Gary Hoyt
RE: Cherry Creek Estates, Section 2
WE ARE SENDING YOU [ X ] UPS [ ] Courier [ ] Other:
JOB NUMBER: 4340552
COPIES SHEET DESCRIPTION
NO.
1 Set Construction Plans with Plat
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
[ X ] For Approval
[ X ] For Your Use
REMARKS:
[ X ] As Requested
[ 1
William A. Bryant
[ ]For Review and Comment
Cc: Tim Walter
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
STOEPPELWERTH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
9940 Allisonville Road
Fishers, Indiana 46038-2005
Phone (317)849-5935
FAX (317) 849-5942
DATE: August 29, 2003
TO: Hamilton County Soil & Water
1108 South Ninth Street
Noblesville, Indiana 46060
ATTENTION: John South
RE: Cherry Creek Estates, Section 2
JOB NUMBER: 4340552
WE ARE SENDING YOU [ X ] UPS [ ] Courier [ ] other
COPIES SHEET DESCRIPTION
NO.
1 Set Construction Plans with Plat
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
[ X ] For Approval [ X I As Requested
( X ] For Your Use ~ ~
r
REMARKS:
[ ]For Review and Comment
William A. Bryant
Cc; Tim Walter
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
STOEPPELWERTH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
9940 Alhsonville Road
Fishers, Indiana 46038-2005
Phone (317)849-5935
FAX (317) 849-5942
DATE: August 29, 2003
TO: Carmel Clay Communication
31 First Avenue NW
Carmel, Indiana 46032
ATTENTION: Bill Akers
RE: Cherry Creek Estates, Section 2
WE ARE SENDING YOU [ X ] UPS [ ] Courier [ ] Other:
JOB NUMBER: 4340552
COPIES SHEET DESCRIPTION
NO.
1 Set Construction Plans with Plat
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
] X ] For Approval [ X J As Requested
~ X ] For Your Use ~ ]
REMARKS:
[ ]For Review and Comment
William A. Bryant
Cc: Tim Walter
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
STOEPPELWERTH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
9940 Allisonville Road
Fishers, lndiana 46035-2005
Phone (317)849-5935
FAX (317) 849-5942
DATE: August 29, 2003 JOB NUMBER: 43405S2
TO: City of Carmel
Building Commissioner
Oue Civic Square
Carmel, Indiana 46032
ATTENTION: Jeff Kendall
RE: Cherry Creek Estates, Secfion 2
WE ARE SENDING YOU [ ] UPS [ ] Courier [ ] Omer: Deliver
COPIES SHEET DESCRIPTION
N0.
1 Set Construction Plans with Plat
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
[ X ] For Approval [ X ] As Requested
( X ] For Your Use [ ]
REMARKS:
]For Review and Comment
William A. Bryant
Cc: Tim Walter
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
STOEPPELWERTH & ASSOCIATES; INC.
9940 Allisonville Road
Fishers, Indiana 46038-2005
Phone (317) 849-5935
FAX (317) 849-5942
DATE: August 29, 2003 JOB NUMBER: 4340552
TO: City of Carmel
Urban Forester
One Civic Square
Carmel, Indiana 46032
ATTENTION: Scott Brewer
RE: Cherry Creek Estates, Section 2
WE ARE SENDING YOU [ ] UPS [ ] Courier [ ] Other: Deliver
COPIES SHEET DESCRIPTION
NO.
1 Set Construction Plans with Plat
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
~ X ] For Approval [ X) As Requested
( X ] For Your Use [ ]
REMARKS:
[ ]For Review and Comment
William A. Bryant
Cc: Tim Walter
Dobosiewicz, Jon C
From: Tingley, Connie S _
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 3:47 PM
To: Brewer, Scott I; Butler, Angie; Dobosiewicz, Jon C; Hollibaugh, Mike P; Lillig, Laurence M;
Pattyn, Dawn E
Subject: New submittal
Just recd
~- S ~ 1~ 'i19-~
:Cherry CreeES;~state"s, , SP Platinum Properties, LLC
5 cfion 2 818-2900 ~,,, ,,,~s.y~,~
I have given the file to Jon.
ct ~ I
~`1'Q~ ~~
o ~ o ~"CY~~12
January 13, 2003
Platinum
Mr. John Dobosiewicz ~. "^ v
Depamnent of Community Services ~;, ~., ~5
One Civic Squaze ~`` Qw
Carmel.IN. 46032
John:
This letter is to clarify the commitments made to the Subdivision Committee in our
meeting on January 7`h, as well as to the surrounding neighbors of our new Cherry Creek
Estates community on Cherry Tree Road and Hazel Dell Pazkway.
Mr. Jim Nelson has prepazed separate commitments for the road improvements for the
new east /west thoroughfaze that were discussed duruig the approval process. It is my
understanding that those commitments are ah-eady in your possession.
After numerous meetings with surrounding property owners, Platinum Properties has
agreed to the following:
Spring Creek:
Installation of an 8' fence along our north boundary, from a point behind Spring Creek lot
16 to Spring Creek lot 28. The fence will not be installed any closer than 8' to the
property line without the consent of the adjouung resident. Approximately 70 trees are
planned along this boundary with 30 planted in the common azea on the Spring Creek
side of the property. These trees will include 12-15 conifers (6-8" height) and 15-18
deciduous (1.5 - 2" caliper). A concept plan of the fence and landscaping has been
submitted to Staff.
Delaware Trace:
The plat will include a 20' conservation easement to insure the protection of the existing
tree line. The Conservation Easement will be defined in the Covenants and Restriction of
the neighborhood.
317 818 2900 • 317 818 2910 fax
9551 Delegates Row• Indianapolis, IN 46240
~_"
,` ;~ ~ . .
All homes that back up to Delaware Trace (Cherry Creek Estates lots 74 to 86) will have
a full brick wrap (brick on all four sides of the home to a height equal to or greater than
the first floor level).
Each home that backs up to Delaware Trace will include at least three reaz yard trees
(conifers of 8' and deciduous of at least 2" caliper). These trees are in addition to the 3
already required by the developer for each home site. A plan will be submitted for these
lots to Scott Brewer for exact plant type and size.
A wallcing trail location that initially concerned the residents has been moved on the plat.
Additional tree plantinES:
A landscape plan has been submitted. The plan calls for almost 1500 new trees be planted
on the site as follows:
• 70-new trees along the Spring Creek property line
• over 250 new trees along the new east / west boulevazd
• over 350 trees in common azeas
• a requirement that the builder (Pulte Homes or successor) install a minimum
of 3 trees per home site (820 trees)
The final species and locations will be subject to a final approval of the plan by Scott
Brewer.
The above considerations are the result of meeting with surrounding homeowners, input
from the Planning Department Staff and the comments of the Sub Division Committee.
Respectfully Submitted:
~~"`
Paul Rioux
President
Platinum Properties, LLC