HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondenceC
June 15, 2004
EL
Tom Laskey
Edgeworth -Laskey Properties, LLC
8470 Allison Pointe Blvd.
Suite 120
Indianapolis, IN 46250 .
Dear Mr. Laskey,
I have received and completed my review of the revised plans you sent me concerning the
placement of the requested fire hydrant for the St. Christopher's Church project. The location of
the scheme "C" meets with the approval of our department.
The fire department has no further concerns at this time.
If our office can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate in contacting me.
Respectfully,
~Y~
Gary A. Hoyt, Fire Marshal
Carmel Fire Prevention Bureau
Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz, Department of Community Services, Planning and Zoning
file (2)
CARMEL FIRE DEPARTMENT HEADQUARTERS
Two Crnc SQuARe, CARMEL, IN 46032 OFFICE 317.571.2600, FAx 317.571.2615
JAMES BRAINARD, MAYOR
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
TECHNICAL REVIEW AND COMMENT
Hamilton County Soil and Water Conservation District
1108 South 9t" Street, Noblesville IN 46060
Ph- 377-773-1432 or Email at 'oho-south iaswcd.or
PROJECT NAME: St Christopher's Episcopal Church Phase 1
SUBMITTED BY: St. Christopher's Episcopal Church Mr. Joseph Schmit
1440 West Main Street Woollen Molzan and Partners
Cannel, In 46032 47 S. Pennsylvania Street Suite 1000
Indianapolis, IN 46204
j Schmit@woollenmolzan.com
REVIEWED BY: John B. South P.E.
Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control
PLAN REVIEW DATE: March 25, 2004 Acreage: Part of a larger plan of development
LOCATION: North side of main Street''/a mile east of US 31
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sec. 26
TOWNSHIP: 18N RANGE: 3E CNIL TOWNSHIP: Clay
SOIL SURVEY MAP SHEET: 50
The technical review and comments are intended to evaluate the completeness of the erosion and sediment controlplan for the
project. The erosion and sediment control plmt submitted was not reviewed for the adequacy of the engineering design. All
practices included in the plan, as well as those recommended in the comments should be evaluated as to theirfeasibility by a
qualified individual with structural practices designed by a qualified engineer. The plan has not been reviewed for local, state,
or federal permits that may be required to proceed with this project. Additional information, including design calculations may
be requested to further evaluate the erosion and sediment control plan.
The erosion and sediment control plan has been reviewed and it has been determined that the plan:
X Satisfies the minimum requirements and intent of 327IAC 15-5 (Rule 5). Notification will be forwarded to the
Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
Proper implementation of the erosion and sediment conhol plan and inspections of the construction site by the developer or a
representative are necessary to minimize off-sate sedimentation. The developer should be aware that unforeseen construction
activities and weather conditions might affect the perforrnance ofa practice or the erosion and sediment control plan. The plan
must be a flexible document, with provisions to modify or substitute practices as necessary.
Cc: Carmel DOCS
Ha. Co. Surveyor
IDEM
File
Revised 4 / 9
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
TECHNICAL REVIEW AND COMMENT
Hamilton County Soil and Water Conservation District
1108 South 9t" Street, Noblesville IN 46060
Ph- 317-773-1432 or Email at 'ohn-south iaswcd.or
PROJECT NAME: St Christopher's Episcopal Church Phase 1
SUBMITTED BY: St. Christopher's Episcopal Church Mr. Joseph Schmit
1440 West Main Street Woollen Molzan and Partners
Carmel, In 46032 47 S. Pennsylvania Street Suite 1000
Indianapolis, IN 46204
j schmit@woollenmolzan. com
REVIEWED BY: John B. South P.E.
Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control
PLAN REVIEW DATE: March 6, 2004 Acreage: Part of a larger plan of development
LOCATION: North side of main Street '/o mile east of US 31
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sec. 26
TOWNSHIP: 18N RANGE: 3E CNIL TOWNSHIP: Clay
SOIL SURVEY MAP SHEET: 50
The technical review and comments are intended to evaluate the completeness ofthe erosion and sediment control plan for the
project. The erosion and sediment control plan submitted was not reviewed for the adequacy of the engineering design. All
practices included in the plan, as well as those recommended in the comments should be evaluated as to their feasibility by a
qualified individual with structural practices designed by a qualified engineer. The plan has not been reviewed for local, state,
or federal permits that may be required to proceed with this project. Additional information, including design calculations may
fie requested to further evaluate the erosion and sediment control plan.
The erosion and sediment control plan has been reviewed and it has been determined that the plan:
Satisfies the minimum requirements and intent of 327IAC 15-5 (Rule 5). Notification will be forwarded to the
Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
Refer to the comments section for additional information.
X Does not satisfy the minimum requirements and intent of 327IAC 15-5 (Rule 5); deficiencies are noted in the
checklist and in the comments section. Deficiencies constitute potential violations of the rule and must be
adequately addressed for compliance. The information necessary to satisfy the deficiencies must be submitted:
Proper implementation of the erosion and sediment control plan and inspections of the construction site by the developer or a
representative are necessary to minimize off-site sedimentation. The developer should be aware that unforeseen construction
acfivities and weather conditions might affect the performance of a practice or the erosion and sediment control plan. The plan
must be a flexible document, with provisions to modify or substitute practices as necessary.
Revised 4 / 97
PROJECT: St Christopher's Episcopal Church Phase 1
Page 2 of 3
Yes No
X
X
x
x
x
Yes No
X
x
x
X
X
x
X
x
X
Yes No
X
x
Yes No
X
x
x
X
x
x
X
N/A
xComment
N/A
X
ARE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED ON THE PLANS ?
(All Plans Must Lnclude Appropriate Legends, Scales, and North Arrow)
(items that are NotApplicable to this Project are designated by NAJ
PROJECT INFORMATION
IA Project Location Map (Show project in relation to other areas of the county)
IB Narrative Describing the Nature and Purpose of the Project
IC Location of Planned and/or Existing Roads, Utilities, Structures, Highways, etc.
ID Lot and/or Building Locations
lE Landuse of Adjacent Areas
(Show the Entire Upstream Watershed and ildjacent Areas Within 500 Feet of the Property Lines)
TOPOGRAPHIC, DRAINAGE, AND GENERAL SITE FEATURES
2A Existing Vegetation (Identify and Delineate )
2B Location and Name of All Wetlands, Lakes and Water Courses On and Adjacent to the Site
2C 100 Year Floodplains, Floodway Fringes, and Floodways (Note if None)
2D Soils Information (Ifhydric soils are present, it is the responsibility of ahe owner/developer to
investigaae the existence of wetlands and to obtain permits from the appropriate government agencies.)
2E Existing and Planned Contours at an Interval Appropriate to Indicate Drainage Patterns
2F Locations of Specific Points Where Stormwater Discharge Will Leave the Site
2G Identify All Receiving Waters (If Discharge is to a Separate Municipal Storm Sewer, Identify the
Name ajthe Municipal Operator and the O[timate Receiving Water)
2H Potential Areas Where Storm water May Enter Groundwater (Note ijNone)
2I Location of Stormwater System (Include Culverts, Storm Sewers, Channels, and Swa[es)
LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES
3A Location and Approximate Dimensions of All Disturbed Areas [i.e., Construction Limits]
(Areas Where Yege[ative Cover Will Be Preserved Should be Clearly Designated)
3B Soil Stockpiles and or Borrow Areas (Show Locations or Note if None)
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES
4A Sequence of When Each Measure Will Be Implemented (Relative to Earth Disturbing Activities)
4B Monitoring and Maintenance Guidelines for Each Measure
4C Perimeter Sediment Control Measures (Location, Construction Derail, Dimensions, and Specifications)
4D Temporary Seeding (Specifications; /nc/uding Seed Mix, Fertilizer, Lime, and Mulch Rates)
4E Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Measures
(Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications)
4F Permanent Erosion and Sediment Control Measures
(Loco(ion, Construction Detail, Dimensimrs, and Spec cations)
4G Storm Drain Inlet Protection (Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications)
4H Stormwater Outlet Protection (Location, Constructiar Derail, Dimensions, and Specifications)
4I Stable Construction Entrance (Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications)
4J Erosion and Sediment Control on Individual Building Lots (Specifications)
4K Permanent Seediug (Spec~cotions; Including Seed Mix, Fertilizer, Lime, and Mulch Rates)
Revised 4 / 97
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
TECHNICAL REVIEW
COMMENTS
PROJECT: St Christopher's Episcopal Church Phase 1
Page 3 of 3
Note: All erosion and sediment control measures shown on the plans and referenced in this review must meet the design
criteria, standards, and specifications outlined in the "Lndiana Handbook for Erosion Control in Developing Areas" from the
Lndiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Soil Conservation ar similar Guidance Documents.
1. In narrative form please address the items checked no in section 2.
2. Item 3A. Construction limits should include the stone entrance drive and the utilities.
3. Item 4A. A construction sequence is needed. An example for a commercial project is attached.
4. Item 4B. Maintenance requirements for each practice needs to be included.
5. Item 4C. Provide detail for silt fence.
6. Item 4D. Temporary seeding specs. Are needed.
7. Item 4G. Provide a storm inlet detail.
8. Item 4I. If the stone drive is the construction entrance please label it or provide an additional
construction entrance on the plan.
9. Item 4K. Provide specifications for the permanent seeding- seed, fertility, ground prep and planting
instructions.
Note. This project is being reviewed using the old Rule 5 requirements as the original plans were submitted
prior to November 26~h, 2003. Future construction projects will be reviewed using current Rule 5
requirements. Water quality practices will be required for future submittals.
Note: IDEM will be notified when the plan is approved.
Cc: Carmel DOCS
Ha. Co. Surveyor
File
JelV7ES BR~11A ~RD, MAl"OR
March 1Q 2004
~~~~. ~
O~o
L~
Ss
Mr. Tim Fleck \s-.,
Woollen, Molzan and Partners, Inc. ~'~
i > -i'
47 South Pennsylvania Street, Suite 1000 ~~-'_~_ ~'1;,j~
Indianapolis, IN 46204
RE: St. Christopher's Episcopal Church Expansion-Project 12eview #1
Dear Mr. Fleck:
These comments are based upon the drawings received on September 19, 2003. We will provide comments
for [he drawings received on Febmary 1Q, 2004 as soon as possible.
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. The project site is curzently located within current City of Carmel Corporate Limits. The following
jurisdictions will apply.
2. Jurisdictions:
• Street and Right of W ay - City of Carmel (131" Street).
• Water-Indianapolis Water Company service area.
• Sanitary Sewers -City of Carmel
• Storm Sewer- City of Comae]
• J.R. Collins Legal Drain -Hamilton County Surveyor
3. Board of Public Works and Safely Approval Requirements:
• Sanitary Sewer Availability
• Commercial Curb Cut for new and/or modified 131` Street Entrances. We will require an 8 '/: x
11 drawing of each entrance/curb cut to be used as exhibits for your BP W request. These
drawings should include all pertinent dimensions including accel/decel lanes, drive lane and
median widths, opposing curb cuts, radii, etc.
• Temporary Construction Entrance (if located at a site other than the existing or proposed curb
cuts). Same requirements as for the Commercial Curb Cut.
• Consent to Encroach Agreements for any permanent improvement to be installed within dedicated
easements and/or dedicated right of way.
• Right of Way dedication (if applicable).
I am enclosing a schedule for Board of Public Works and Safety meeting dates and agenda deadlines
for your use. Please use the Engineering Department deadlines for submissions to the Board.
Aay submission to the Bnard requires prior final npprova! by the Carn+el Clay Plan Conunission
arrrUor the Board ojZoningAppeals aad cnnrpletion ojreview by Ste Technical Advisory
Comnriftee. All written requests to be place on the Board's agenda must include the nppropriale
Docket Numbers and the date (or dales) ojapprovnl bJ• the Plnn Conunission anrUor BZA.
Sanitary Sewer Availability (acreage) and Connection Fees:
• Availability (acreage) Fees are based on [he legal description of the property. Please provide this
office with a legal description that lists the total acreage and an exhibit of the legal description.
Drraa~i:etr.~-r or E~~mreat~c
Ore Cn°ic SQuaar:, Caiu+et, h\ 4603? Orrrca 377.j71.2441 Faa 317.571.2439
l:yinli. kwccset^sci.ainncl.in.us
_~
Mr. Tim Fleck
March 10, 2004
Page 2
The Sanitary Sewer Availability Fee is 51,365.00 per acre. The church originally paid (on June
2Q, 1994) Availability Fees on 9.25 acres. However, this was later adjusted to 6.6 acres due to the
fact that the church sold 2.6 acres to the State of Indiana fox completion of the U.S. 31 project ST-
F-222 (9). The church was reimbursed for the value of the difference of 2.6 acres. Availability
Fees will be due on the difference between the origina16.6 acres and the total acreage of the
church expansion. We note the legal description on the Cover Sheet of the drawings submitted
indicate a total of 10.144 acres more or less. It appears that this acreage is for the expanded site.
We also note [here is a legal description for Tract "A" {n the ADLS submission that indicates
9.553 acres. What is the difference?
• Connection Fees are based upon the average user factor tables from Section 9-200 (sanitary) of
our Utility Ordinance. The Connection Fees are 5795.00 per EDU for sanitary sewers. Again, the
church originally paid (on June 2Q, 1994) Connection Fees based upon a seating capacity of 325
and 2.6 EDU's. However, this was later adjusted to a capacity of 180 and 1.4 EDU's. The church
was reimbursed for the value of [he difference of 1.2 EDU's. We will need usage information for
the expanded site in order to calculate sanitary sewer connection fees. I am enclosing copies of
our Average User Factors for Sanitary Sewers and our current fee schedule. I have also
highlighted the Average User Factors [ha[ might apply to this development.
Note: Any deviation from the Connection Fee calcuiatiars listed in our Ordinance will require
Cannel (Itilities and Board of Public Works and Safety approvals.
4. TAC Review/Drawings submitted for approval:
We request that all comments and comment letters generated by this office be answered in writing and
be accompanied by a drawing reflecting requested revisions. Final drawings will not be approved for
construction until al] issues have been resolved. All Carmel Utility issues mast also re resolved. The
design engineer must certify all drawings submitted for final approval. This office will require a
minimum of four-sets (maximum of six-sets) of approved drawings after all issues have been resolved.
The drawings will be stamped approved and signed by both the City Engineer and Drrector Carmel
Utilities. The Developer/Owner will receive one-set which is to be maintained on the construction site
at all times. Carme] Utilities will receive one-set. Our Public Works Inspector will receive one-set
and one-set will be maintained in [he Department of Engineering. If more than the minimum offour-
sets is requested to be approved, the additional sets (maximum total of two additional) must be
submitted with [he four required sets.
5. Please be advised [hat any installation of signs, walls, irrigation systems, etc. within dedicated
easements and/or right of way wilt require a Consent to Encroach Agreement between the
Owmer/Developer and the City of Carmel. This Agreement requires Board of Public Works and Safety
approval.
6. Cannel Utilities does not subscribe to "Holey Moley" and should be contacted directly for all sanitary
sewer main locations.
7. Carmel Utilities will provide a separate review of this project for sanitary sewer issues.
8. I am including copies of the following with [his correspondence:
• Commercial Project Approval Procedures.
• Performance Release Procedure.
• Permit Da[a, Contacts, etc.
• Commercial Permitting Procedures.
• Dedication of Right of Way documents.
BONDING REOUIREDIENTS
9. Upon initial review, it appears the following bonding requirements may apply to this project:
Mr. Tim Fleck
March 10, 2004
Page 3
Performance Guarantees
• There do not appear to be any Performance Guarantee requirements for this expansion.
Street Cu[/Right of R'ay Permit and Bonding Requirements
There appear [o be at least three instances of work in the right of way of 131" Street associated with
demolition activities (Sheet C1.01):
I) Remove existing pavement and/or walk
3) Saw cudremove pavement
5) Remove power poles/guide wires (mayor may not be right of way issues).
Also, new and/or modified 131" Street entrances will be included in the Right of Way Permit
requirements as will [he closure/elimination of any existing residential curb cuts. Details regarding the
Right of Way Permit and associated Right of Way bonding requirements should be directed to Fred
Glaser, Department of Engineering Right of Way Inspector/Manager.
Please note that anv open pavement cuts in dedicated streets require approval by our Board of
Public R'orks and Safetv.
PROJECT COMMENTS
10. Please provide an estimated construction schedule for the three phases.
11. Will the existing church building remain after the completion of the expansion? If so, in what
capacity?
12. There is a proposed development on the south side of 131 ~` called Alexandria of Carmel. Please
indicate on your site plans [he proposed location of their curb cut. The plans for this development have
been prepared by Paul I Cripe Engineers. The contact at Cripe is Paul Donica.
Sheet C1.01 Demolition Plan
13. Demolition permits will be required through our Building and Code Enforcement Department. If there
are any wells to be abandoned or removed, contact Morris Hensley of Carmel Utilities.
14. Please dimension the apparent north right of way line of 131" Street.
Sheet C2.O1Site Plan
15. Is the 60-foot half right of way indicated on this sheet, right of way to be dedicated to the City of
Carmel? We assume that this is not existing right of way. If it is not, please indicate, identify and
dimension the existing right of way line.
16. Are [he patterned areas intended to indicate sidewalks? This pattern should be shown and identified as
a Legend on the sheet.
17. If these are sidewalks, what are you planning in [he right of way? Is this stamped and colored
concrete?
18. Are there additional existing/plannedeosements other than the 5' Utility Strip?
Sheet C2.03 Phase 2 Site Plan
19. Please distinguish Phase 2 from Phase 1 bycross-hatching or shading Phase 1 construction.
Sheet C2.04 Phase 3 Site Plan
20. Please distinguish Phase 3 from Phase 1 and 2 bycross-hatching or shading Phase 1 and 2
construction.
Sheet C3.O1Grading and Utility Plan
21. There are no underground storm pipes planned for [he parking lots or other areas other than those
indicated?
22. Are the initials FL intended to designate flow lines or "invert elevations"?
23. It appears that the outlet for the dry detention pond discharges into the right of way of 131 °' Street.
This is not an acceptable outlet location. No storm sewer conveyance system exists along 131" Street
at this time that can accommodate the storm drainage from this site. Please modify plans ro identify an
acceptable outlet and allow detention basins to discharge to that location.
Mr. Tim Fleck
March 1Q 2004
Page 4
24. Is the %:" and'/a"pipes found on the west boundary and on the right of way line associated with the
legal drain? What is the pipe material?
25. How do you plan to serve the expansion area with water and sanitary sewer if this expansion happens
prior to Carmel Utilities extension of utilities?
26. The water service is indicated [o be "existing Carmel water main extension". Don'[ think that is the
case.
The above comments are based upon the Engineering Department's initial review. Please provide our
office with a follow up letter regarding this review and revised plans, indicating all revisions. A second
review will focus only on detailed construction plans. It is critical that our office be made aware of all
modifications made on the plans being re-submitted, particularly if any such changes are considered "new"
or fall outside of our initial review. This project will not be released for construction until all Engineering
Department and other local agency issues have been addressed. Specifically, all issues outlined by the
Hamilton County Surveyor's Office and the Hamilton County Soil and Water Conservation District must
be addressed. If you have questions, please contact Mike McBride or me at 571-2441.
Sincerel~~~~~
~~
Dick Hill, Assistant Director
Department of Engineering
Enclosures
cc: Mike McBride, City Engineer (w.o. encl.)
Jon Dobosiewicz, Department of Community Services (w.o. encl.)
John Duffy, Director of Carmel Utilities (w.o. encl.)
Jim Haag, Wastewater Utility (w.o. encl.)
Greg Hoyes, Hamilton County Surveyor's Office (w/o encl.)
John South, Hamilton County Soi] and Water (w/o encl.)
S:V'ROIREV03\STCHRISTOPF IEREPISCOPAL
_ I ~/Zr~d3
T_I "~ w~.
~~ ~~~~~
J ~ '. ~as~ ~ ~~ Fk~_ar,_e,,,~._CA~n~sr~_2_~~
_S ITT R?ti-n+c~ o~',a~~~w.~~~
~~ P,R~c~~taa-D~-rXht.s
~€--s ~r~1_2-a- W ~roT rf¢q~ r.~~ w 2-0 ~-~'
h1;Or16~ i^/. ~!~ZS.1'TY I.N }~I._/m7rW63 .
MIKE ', S'i~v+~~ w Gonw.,6~TS C~NR$s"~ GgR~~~6~
-' PF.tia rtuua!ap_rke.o_u~/fi~~+~a..K_A_4?e.ss_cac,s.T.u!+~
JOT i2i~ ~5~2~d~ P,S
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
DOCKET No. 140-03 Z / #03090015
Part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 26,
County, Indiana and part of the real estate
57571 and 2000-6246 in the Office of
particularly described as follows:
Townshipl8 North Range 3 East, Hamilton
described in Instruments Numbered 2000-
the Recorder of Hamilton County, more
Commencing at the southwest corner of said Northeast Quarter, thence along the south
line thereof North 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East 372.82 feet; thence North 00
degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East 216.41 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence North
00 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East 254.59 feet; thence North 45 degrees 24 minutes
39 seconds East 240.12 feet; thence South 88 degrees 55 minutes 00 seconds East 385.56
feet; thence Southwesterly 700.69 feet along an arc to the left and having a radius of
1546.83 feet and subtended by a long chord having a bearing of South 53 degrees 13
minutes 44 seconds West and length of 694.72 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing
965 acres, more or less.
One Civic Square
Cannel, IN 46CC32
(31 ~ 571-24i 7
Fax: (31 ~ 57t -2426
Fau
To: ~\~`~1 ~ 1~(~{C.~ From: /1 VI~~F ~j~'~,Q,-~
,/ ~
Fax ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 (7t0`( Pages: ~Z.
Phone: Date: (- ~~ -
Re: J~ .e ~4 Sfi"Of~l S '~fZONf. CC:
^ Urgent ^ Far Review ^ Please Comment ^ Please Reply Q Please Recycle
~~~
I~=~~~~
,111'
N'~Uw~~~ eq~
p4 ~ ~
Q;g~~rpp Clt of Carmel
4QTUN G~'~VOI11
September 22, 2003
Tim Flech
St. Christopher's Episcopal Church
1440 W Main Street
Carmel, IN 46032
RE: St. Christopher's Episcopal Church -Rezone
Dear Mr. Flech:
This letter is in response to your Rezone Application for ~St
preliminary letter to let you begin on revisions. Additional a
Meeting on October 15. Please complete the following items
the TAC Meeting.
VIA FAX: 687-2064
Original by mail
-'s-Episcopal-Ghurch~ This is a
vill be made by members at the TAC
have received additional comments at
1. Please provide a list of adjacent property o ers, certified from the Hamilton County Auditor's
Office.
2. Please provide proof of public legal tice.
3. Please correct the zoning map a it; the parcels southeast of the subject property are zoned
OM/SFA.
4. Please provide a legal de ption for the area to be rezoned, including acreage size.
5. Will there be a prima subdivision plat filed or will you keep the parcel two different zonings?
If you have any questio~or if I may be of assistance, please feel free to call.
Sincerely,
Angelina Butler
Planning Administrator
StChri stophersChu rch-Z
Page 1
ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571-2417
REZONE from S-2/US 31 to OM/SU
Roads
-- Interstate
-- US Highway
-- State Road
-- Major Roads
- Minor Roads
- Subdivision Roads
- Private Road or Drive
^ Parcel Boundary
Zoning
-~ yZoning
SCALE 1:3,468
~ ~
200 o zoo aoo soo
FEET
N
1
http://216.37.62.70/map/carmel.mwf Wednesday, September 17, 2003 3:47 PM