HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008-0923; Matt MilamKeeling, Adrienne M
From: Matt Milam [matt.milam@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 2:47 PM
To: Keeling, Adrienne M
Subject: Comprehensive Plan 2008
Page 1 of 1
9/23/2008
Andrea,
My thought on Comprehensive Plan 2008:
1. Since Carmel has not annexed Home Place and not taking any tax dollars from the area
and the Home Place annexation is in court for the next three years. I would suggest that the
City of Carmel leave Home Place area out of the Comprehensive Plan.
2. If you are going to leave Home Place in the plan, please have a representative from the
Home Place area on the committee so that the people who live in the area have imput.
3. This compehensive plan has changed names a number of times and is an off and on
process. If you are going to institute the plan, then put it in place. Quit wasting taxpayer
money year after year and quit wasting peoples time since they have to sit through the
meetings year after year.
4. Home Place does not need buildings that have the retail on the bottom with condo's on top
or other office space. This is a fine design if the City of Carmel wants that for their streets, but
leave Home Place alone. The fiscal plan that Carmel wrote for the annexation said that it
would keep the Home Place history in place and not go making it just like Carmel. The people
of Home Place do not need arches, and all brick buildings and statues and all the other crap
you have in Carmel to make us feel important.
Matt Milam