HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008-1021; Mike SharpKeeling, Adrienne M
From: Mike and Michele Sharp [mmsharp@ameritech.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 9:51 AM
To: Keeling, Adrienne M
Cc: Joe.Hile@specialtiescompany.com; Ron F Houck
Subject: Fw: neighborhood issues.....
Page 1 of 3
10/22/2008
Adrienne,
I concur with the many e-mails you have received on this topic. Please forward this to Mr. Dierckman.
Thanks,
Mike Sharp
10958 Springmill Lane
--- On Mon, 10/20/08, suzanne glesing <suzanneg@indy.rr.com> wrote:
From: suzanne glesing <suzanneg@indy.rr.com>
Subject: neighborhood issues.....
To: "jcl" <jliebe@ameritech.net>
Cc: "'Joe Hile'" <joe.hile@SpecialtiesCompany.com>, "'Belcher D'"
<dwbelcher@sbcglobal.net>, "'Byrne J'" <JSByrne57@aol.com>, "'Clark George'"
<GCCarmel@aol.com>, "'Clark Shirley'" <orangac@aol.com>, "'Corken M'"
<corkens@in.net>, "'Diehr M'" <mpdiehr@sbcglobal.net>, "'Diehr M'"
<mhd10966@sbcglobal.net>, "'Gardiner D'" <jdgardiner@yahoo.com>, "'Golden B'"
<bmg@deltafaucet.com>, "'Golden G'" <GGolden@goldenv.com>, "'Hagen R'"
<RL72JF@sbcglobal.net>, "'Harry W'" <wkharry@yahoo.com>, "'Hart G'"
<gary.hart@us.ibm.com>, "'Hart K'" <khart@boselaw.com>, "'Healey P'"
<panddhealey@indy.rr.com>, "'Hile Karen L. (Fka Petranek)'" <klhile@iupui.edu>, "'Houck P'"
<paminkdgn@hotmail.com>, "'Houck R'" <rfhouck@lilly.com>, "'Jehs D'"
<dawn@goldenv.com>, "'Jenkins L'" <Lou_R_Jenkins@ML.com>, "'Kirsh J'"
<Jacque@Kirsh.com>, "'Kirsh S'" <SKirsh@Kirsh.com>, "'Lewis G'" <glewis@indy.rr.com>,
"'Lieberman J'" <Jliebe@ameritech.net>, "'Marsh A'" <amarsh@ppgllc.us>, "'Marsh R'"
<rmarsh@healthyindy.com>, "'Mason A'" <amason317@hotmail.com>, "'McKenna J'"
<jam4105@aol.com>, "'McKenna R'" <Rm0425@aol.com>, "'Murray R'"
<murrayrhonda@aol.com>, "'Oldiges D'" <DanOldiges@sbcglobal.net>, "'Oldiges L'"
<LinOldiges@sbcglobal.net>, "'Pearson L'" <lesleywetzel@yahoo.com>, "'Pearson R'"
<pwpearson@gmail.com>, "'Perry K'" <kperry@earthlink.net>, "'Perry M'"
<mperry@citysecurities.com>, "'Roach D'" <dave.roach@SpecialtiesCompany.com>, "'Roach
S'" <roachhomes@aol.com>, "'Schnitz M'" <schnitzm@stlukesumc.com>, "'Sharp M'"
<MMSharp@ameritech.net>, "'Sharp M'" <Michael.Sharp@fssa.in.gov>, "'Sergi J'"
<sergino@att.net>, "'Thompson L'" <lanithompson@hotmail.com>, "'Sergi J'"
<jmsbeautysupply@sbcglobal.net>, "'Sharp M'" <Sharp_Michele@lilly.com>, "'Williams B'"
<brieq@earthlink.net>, "'Skarbeck E'" <ed@aldebarancapital.com>, "'Wagner G'"
<gvwagner@aol.com>, "'Williams K'" <rkevwill@mac.com>, "'Schwartz C'"
<Schwartz@kaufman.uits.indiana.edu>, "'Schwartz A'" <alexis_schwartz@timeinc.com>,
"'Zimmerman B'" <Bzimmerman@cgglawfirm.com>, "'Scott C'" <chadscott@aim.com>,
"'Zimmerman J'" <jpzimmerman@lilly.com>
Date: Monday, October 20, 2008, 3:32 PM
Just wanted to copy you guys on the letter I sent this weekend....
From: suzanne glesing
Date: 10/19/2008 11:29:07 AM
To: AKeeling@carmel.in.gov
Cc: HOUCK_RON_f@lilly.com; Joe Hile
Subject: Spring Mill Place Subdivision
Dear Adrienne,
Please forward these comments to Leo Dierckman.
My name is Suzanne Glesing, and I am a resident in the Spring Mill Place subdivision.
As a resident, I am opposed to the creation of a special study area to study the area on the east side of Spring
Mill Road north of 111th Street to the southern border of Spring Lakes Estates.
I realize that there was recently a meeting which took place on September 23rd that was solely devoted to
discussing the Land Use map. The area now being considered for special study was discussed at length and
the decision was made to leave it designated as residential. At the conclusion of that meeting the process was
to move on to subsequent sections.
It is also my understanding that on October 14th another meeting was held and the previous conclusion from the
September meeting was reversed. This is a disservice to your process and especially a disservice to those who
took the time to attend the FIRST meeting. Why take the time, if simply another meeting will be held less that
one month later and have all of previous discussions revisited and CHANGED? Especially when it was not even
on the agenda and all of the same people are not in attendance.
Having been made aware of the results of the September meeting, I felt no need to attend the October
meeting because a decision had already been made. Apparently I was wrong. Even though these issues were
finalized at the previous meeting - they were revisited without the same people who had previously taken the
time to be present. This is absolutely unfair and seemingly unethical. The correct process is to leave the area
designated as residential, as agreed to at the September 23rd meeting.
As some Plan Commission members indicated at the October 14th meeting, a project for the land between
111th and 116th Streets is ONCE AGAIN going to be presented to the Plan Commission and it's merits
considered at that time. WHY?! This has already been addressed, and finalized in September.
Creating a special study area merely prolongs the process and needlessly involves the residents of
my subdivision in yet MORE MEETINGS, a strategy merely designed to wear down my neighbors and myself.
We all have busy lives involving our children, our families, our jobs and whatever else. Taking the time to attend
YET ANOTHER meeting - feel as if our presence is worthwhile - only to find out that it will once again be
a WASTE OF TIME leaves all of us more than disappointed in the system that we are expected to count on.
I WILL be at the next meeting - as will many other members of my neighborhood. Hopefully the effort will result
in an improvement of communication and resolve.
Suzanne Glesing
11057 Spring Mill Lane
Carmel, IN 46032
Page 2 of 3
10/22/2008
Page 3 of 3
10/22/2008