Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008-1022; Richard VitalesKeeling, Adrienne M From: rjvitales@sbcglobal.net Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 9:36 AM To: Keeling, Adrienne M Subject: Land Use Page 1 of 1 10/22/2008 Dear Adrienne, As a resident of the Williams Mill subdivision, I am opposed to the creation of a special study of the area on the east side of Spring Mill Road north of 111th Street to the southern border of Spring Lakes Estates. The meeting on September 23rd was solely devoted to discussing the Land Use map. The area now being considered for special study was discussed at length and the decision was made to leave it designated as residential. At the conclusion of that meeting, the process was to move on to subsequent items of business. However, at the October 14th meeting, this subject was once again revisited by those who want to reverse the decision already made. This is a disservice to your process and to those who attend and expect resolution at each meeting, rather than revisiting issues when they are not on the agenda and all people are not in attendance. This is certainly unfair to those people who did not attend thinking these issues were finalized at the previous meeting. The correct process is to leave the area designated as residential, as agreed to at the September 23rd meeting. As some Plan Commission members indicated at the October 14th meeting, a project for the land between 111th and 116th Streets should be presented to the Plan Commission and it's merits considered at that time. Creating a special study area merely prolongs the process and needlessly involves the residents in our subdivision in yet more meetings; a strategy merely designed to wear down residents. Sincerely, Richard Vitales