HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication Morrissey, Phyllis G
From: Lillig, Laurence M
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 2:04 PM
To: Morrissey, Phyllis G; Pattyn, Dawn E; Tingley, Connie S; Babbitt, Pamela A
Cc: Hollibaugh, Mike P; Dobosiewicz, Jon C; Butler, Angelina V; Keeling, Adrienne M; Kendall,
Jeff A; Brewer, Scott I; Hancock, Ramona B
Subject: Docket No. Assignment: East 96th Street Auto Park, Lot 1 Tom Wood Lexus (V- 35 -03)
The following Docket No. has been assigned to the Development Standards Variance petition filed by Chuck Wright of the
Elliott Wright Group on behalf of The Enclave Development Co., Inc., for property located at 12635 Enclave Court (The
Enclave of Carmel, Lot 33):
Docket No. V -44 -03 ZO 8.04.03(c) 8' aggregate side yard $655.00
This Item will not appear on an agenda of the Technical Advisory Committee.
This Item will appear on the Tuesday, May 27, 2003, agenda of the Board of Zoning Appeals Hearing Officer under
Public Hearings.
Mailed and Published Public Notice needs to occur no later than Saturday, May 17, 2003. PLEASE NOTE THAT BZA
NOTICE IS TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE INDIANAPOLIS STAR.
The Filing Fee and the Proof of Notice will need to be received by this Department no later than noon, Friday, May 23,
2003. Failure to submit either the Filing Fee or the Proof of Notice by this time will result in the automatic tabling of the
petition to the Monday, June 23, 2003, agenda of the BZA.
Four (4) Informational Packets must be delivered to BZA Secretary Connie Tingley no later than noon, Friday, May 16,
2003. Failure to submit Informational Packets by this time will result in the automatic tabling of the petition to the Monday,
June 23, 2003, agenda of the BZA. Please refer to the Development Standards Variance Instruction Sheet for minimum
contents of the Informational Packet.
The petitioner will need to bring three (3) additional fully filled -out Findings -of -Fact sheets (DSV application, Sheet 8) for
each petition the night of the meeting for the Board's use. Petitioner must also remember to fill out only the Docket No.,
Petitioner, and date on each Ballot Sheet (DSV application, Sheet 7) for the Board. The Findings -of -Fact and Ballot
Sheets must be collated.
Connie, please contact Mr. Wright of Elliott Wright Group at 317/846 -3798 (fax: 317/ with this information.
Laurence M. Lillig, Jr. �nn
Planning Zoning Administrator /J i1 66 ?Li e
Division of Planning Zoning
Department of Community Services
City of Carmel
One Civic Square 5
Carmel, IN 46032
317/571-2417
fax: 317/571 -2426
llillig@ci.carmel.in.us
1
City of Carmel
Department of Community Services
One Civic Square
Carmel, IN 46032
317- 571 -2417
Fax: 317- 571 -2426
FACSIMILE TELECOPY COVER LETTER
DATE: May 13, 2003
TO: Chuck Wright, Elliott Wright Group
FAX: 846 -3796
FROM: Connie
Attached hereto are 2 pages, including this cover letter, for facsimile transmission.
Should you experience any problem in the receipt of these pages, please call 317/571/2419
and ask for Connie.
NOTES:
Attached is the filing information for The Enclave.
Please call if you have any questions.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The materials enclosed with this facsimile transmission are private and confidential
and are the property of the sender. The information contained in the material is privileged and is intended only for
the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any
unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this telecopied
information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this facsimile transmission in error, please immediately notify
us by telephone to arrange for return of the forwarded documents to us.
CITY.OFICARMEL CLAY TOWNS.
HAMILTON COUNTY, INDIANA
APPLICATION FOR BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ACTION
DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE REQUEST RECFIVFD
AY 12 2003
FEE: $655.00 for the first plus $72.50 for each additional section of the ordinance being ypried.
DOCKET NO. DATE RECEIVED: U
1) Applicant: ti C- Au e= L�� e I U r M -k./7` e
Address: 104 b! I �2 so Sat re Z-► 0 1 2€I 4 cr3Z..
2) Project Name: EN'Cl t m e- Phone: .e)4 2
Engineer /Architect: B e-N-IAA K 1.3t/ Phone: 1 15 )�j 0 5
Attorney: 1--- 0 i7> 1 x-12 a Phone: 70 7
3) Applicant's Status: (Check the appropriate response)
X (a) The applicant's name is on the deed to the property
(b) The applicant is the contract purchaser of the property /1506 x O
(c) Other: C\ L.Jci V\+
4) If Item 3) (c) is checked, please complete the following: ,O'dF(Z-71$042.21-
Owner of the property involved:
Owner's address: 70 ✓0 e7
1 5) Record of Ownership: Os V
iiieeio./Instrument No. O 70 12"-t13
-Pew Purchase date: U 1V 1 9 (C
6) Common address of the property involved: 1Z Co 3 5 E C 1 ,mil e-- l_
Legal description: Lo-r Otk rvkiv -Pv" Y 64 1 t`ve �'3 L JcJ J aW1� I.
Tax Map Parcel No.: 1 2 S S(, c (tp'ID o-0 15
O v3 OOb
7) State explanation of requested Developmental Standards Variance: (State what you want to do and cite the
section number(s) of the Carmel /Clay Zoning Ordinance which applies and /or creates the need for this request).
��-e C 77047 8 e-1 (�1 ivk eJ T (4r` /C j E l �7 it 4 epti
m eevio a vail k ‘,./44, 0 Docle6.--r NC 1.1 90
A-vs —Pow! 1 A1 are 1 Aar
1 D y, n Seer 5 k IA) A e n E
Page 1 of 8 z:\shared\forms \BZA applications\ Developmental Standards Variance Application rev. 12/31/02
8) State reasons supporting the Development Standards Variance: (Additionally, complete the attached question
sheet entitled "Findings of Fact Development Standards Variance (5 et q Ad,e/G D> j /r�j
pe c1 a
F s/O/t W/UR 1,-1P P 1 AE k ,i1j WY �NO� S 7' fah /t c k 17
5 t 1 Mora t S blvd c gj a i (nve.-1 C c�.r v".�. i i, ate/ ti a �c.� e r t u e. S
e /a (Ar awl <a4cta
9) Present zoning of the property (give exact classification): 1 t 61. -14-91
10) Size of lot/parcel in question: '7 1 5 5 -c reS acres
11) Present use of the property: V#-D--sT LT
12) Describe the proposed use of the property: Fj51
13) Is the property: Owner occupied
Renter occupied
Other VA-c-AiJ rT"
14) Are there any restrictions, laws, covenants, variances, special uses, or appeals filed in connection with this
property that would relate or affect its use for the specific purpose of this application? If yes, give date and docket
number, decision rendered and pertinent explanation.
l`--) O
15) Has work for which this application, is being filed already started? If answer is yes, give details:
g )\l r 'ff111 r Air) (FAO
Building Permit Number:
Builder: El L1 1 VI.Nef l i t\- vo V1 L L C
16) If proposed appeal is granted, when will the work commence?
2 Zoo 3
17) If the proposed variance is granted, who will operate and /or use the proposed_ improvement for which this
application has been filed?
Fw b'tT W 1-E--r- d 1 L L
NOTE: •-I 0 "D ex; v no El /r'7IC 3
LEGAL NOTICE shall be published in the Indianapolis Star a MANDATORY twenty-five (25) days prior to the public
hearing date. The certified "Proof of Publication" affidavit for the newspaper must be available for inspection the night of
the hearing.
LEGAL NOTICE to all adjoining and abutting property owners is also MANDATORY, two methods of notice are
recommended:
1) CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED sent to adjoining property owners. (The white receipt
Page 2 of 8 z:\shared \forms \BZA applications\ Development Standards Variance Application rev. 02/04/2003
AFFIDAVIT
I, hereby swear that I am the owner /contract purchaser of property involved in this application and that the foregoing
signatures, statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and
correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I, the undersigned, authorize the applicant to act on my behalf with regard
to this application and subsequent hearings and testimony.
Signed:
(Property Owner, Attorney, or Power of Attorney) .Date
o 44-w C,- 444-1/
G
(Please Print)
STATE OF INDIANA
SS:
County of Before me the undersigned, a Notary Public
(County in which notarization takes place)
for I k O. YV`l l Y\ County, State of Indiana, personally appeared
(Notary Public's county of residence)
-o v" and acknowledge the execution of the foregoing instrument this
(Property Owner, Attorney, or Power of Attorney)
7• day of 20 0
Nota0Public Signature
(SEAL)
Mox PK S e--
Notary Public Please Print
My commission expires: (St.' r
111`.
l
Page 4 of 8 z:\shared \forms \BZA applications\ Developmental Standards Variance Application rev. 12/31/02
CARMEUCLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
Carmel, Indiana
Docket No.: j�
Petitioner: riJC (AVE %G iO� (D 0010 -12PJ\/
FINDINGS OF FACT DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheet)
1.
2.
3.
DATED THIS DAY OF 20
Board Member
Page 7 of 8 z: \shared \forms \BZA applications\ Developmental Standards Variance Application rev. 12/31/02
t t
3 i 7t Air 'Y4 1
CARMELICLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
CARMEL, INDIANA
Docket No.:
Petitioner: The Enc1 avp fPvP1 npmPnt C•nmpany, Tnn,
FINDINGS OF FACT DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE
1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the
community because:
u u s
Ir e_
tion and, the proposed site meets all of the set back and building
i ne regu uri c
1
2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a
substantially adverse manner because:
The granting of the variance will have no impact on the adja-
cent properties because the existing property lines and site plans
mor than compensate for the variance of 1.29 feet.
3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the
use of the property because:
The proposed lot 33 construction is to be similar to existing
homes in the amended R -2 subdivision known as "Enclave of Carmel"
and for purposes of achieving consistency in such a development,
the variance is needed.
DECISION
IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel /Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Developmental Standards Variance
Docket No. is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this
Board, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof.
Adopted this day of 20
CHAIRPERSON, CarmellClay Board of Zoning Appeals
SECRETARY, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals
Conditions of the Board are listed on the back. (Petitioner or his representative to sign).
Z:\shared\forms\BZA applications\devstandapp
Revised 12/31/2002
Page 8 of 8 z\shared1forms1aZA applications\ Developmental Standards Variance Application rev. 12/31/02
Enclave of Carmel
Home Owners Association
May 9, 2003
Mr. Chuck Wright
Elliot Wright Group
599 Industrial Drive, Suite 316
Carmel, IN 46032
Dear Chuck,
This is to confirm Enclave board approval of the architectural drawings you provided for the
homes on lots 25 33 contingent on the following items:
1. That the roof line on the home for lot 33 will have at least a 9/12 pitch.
2. Casement windows to be used as on previous homes you built.
3. All items on the Architectural Standards (5/9/03) are met in full.
We would also remind you of page 39 in the Enclave covenants, which addresses the subject
or window placement. In practice many homes in the Enclave have a window on the zero lot
line side but they are situated so as not to look into the adjacent structure's windows.
Lastly, the board would support Elliott Wright in obtaining a variance to the minimum
aggregate side yard requirement for the plans as presented to the board.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
a t el, 1 441
Donald W. Hecht
President, Enclave Homeowners Association
317- 846 -4898
317- 258 -5562 (cell)
thehechts@inter-linc.net
Enclave of Carmel Architectural Plans Lots 25 33
Home Owners Association
5/9/2003, 12:26 PM
2
a
co
v
N
O
O
N
N
r-
2
A
W
1 m x v v TM a r W t� Y, r s. C t. fi k b0 S 1NVENIVd m ma x H �C,H
0 t,,,, 0,- i 'fir's vt v 1 1 1 z
i: S, P� x� s t 'F' n b e t a„
Fyn sS 1 h'
H\ apt R S �a1 d P a y kL, 44' icy r :4 a
a HOI i G N OR C� 14, a AAt t� A d o yr J r S
Q t �Q fi, 2la HI 4: >f- R w�W
S �s u
S a i L p� �1 fi s 1 a
tas .iN �4 M t G U fh y d '4 1 �4�,,,, g am` 2, r '4. il ap)5 xr 1 Z
t o O 0
i4` 's 4,a a w ivy 3 ''Sa' r 't`' �aca' 1 .,6+ r 4 .Fn' $+.3, .i4 c v' w ,a C ,:t: 10%
a Y x' o au t ro J .a U `r a f x rr e n
kx '�t' €'�,'k�,& s ac k t✓�a�,�� &"a k�%. k �a.9�
r "'skpA?atikrtir" 0 ANA4+ "�Nt l x a rz y `S r ya1Xa"ar"nL t -uc t 2'fi
x t ...:,,,,,,,v,„:„ C L fi r
w)�' DR w+
r ‘.4,
61 t APP4 1* „ti Q MOHAW ILLS DR r, x
3 s t,' 4
yr a 4 o'' t
S"'r F y S sCC.. J�? ,y¢ ".R K'
Ma' y. i r r.i A �3'i aa= k?' '40,4 „y P” 6 1 S 5 r i v t i i� ¢iyr� f 6 4pp"�t,S i 1 ,p4'.. i P i3 5,X .'/A W 1. 4 w wi A an Aij ..j wo •8 X 'UMea T" 4 4 .1 ie s,
C ASV d/O acv 1 i v- 3 vi x1 u'g', 1 a A. 1 /l p W
,,mh J�� s .'i 1 g a Q
s a bd HSV SH DR I co
,3,..,,„A
AS '°t a "t i x a& e o a y J x° v" E
rit P. e ke 2� 3 O y h p a 'iv F O fi' „4,- L
a V 1 r a a A e 4 o to CL 4 '0'
RD LN N 1 Ism O "KINZER AVE E ,:,r,
v
c
c
0
E
co
t
0
o
I
C
.CHM��.., V YING INC.
BENCHMARK SUR E
Donn M. Scotten, Registered Land Surveyor
9855 Crosspoint Blvd., Suite 110, Indianapolis, IN 46256
'y Phone (317) 841-1506 Fax (317) 841-1507
4
Sanitary sewer lateral locotions are NOTE: Str. No. 109
approximate, and are to be field
verified by the contractor. T FRONT BUILDING SETBACK LINE WAS P Top of Casting Sanitary sewer manholes cleanouts PLATTED AS 20 FEET. Elev. 840.49
THEY HAVE BEEN CHANGED
shall not be within one foot horizontal i 11
distance of pavement or concrete TO 15 FEET BY VARIANCE V- 20 -93.
including driveways sidewalks.
Driveways within subdivision shall be
constructed of concrete or asphalt
material.
r
1 N
i
0 0
1
C).\)./
,y
3
U
V
U
3/
S
6 1
01. L. EASEMENT
s ue°,' 37 BENEFITTING LOT 33
wo te j S /N''...■ �iI EMI
r Ci r
e
an:
;s� L. EASEMENT
37.7 J t o �i O.L. BENEFITTING LOT 34
l 90
Str. No. 110 e loe� wo y ---,JP'. '2
Top of Casting 'i� s DRAINAGE to
Elev. 837.16 1 1 1 5 s °o• o
o j o� h r 1 LAKE MANNT.
O.L. L. EASEMENT �I ti —jiJ ESMT.
BENEFITTING LOT 32 j A; Re 0 i
F�ek S e ce de�
s
37.5 A g
o
�°�a 4V LOT 33
y
O.L. L. EASEMENT 16.
BENEFITTING LOT 33
135.5
POND TA
NORMAL POOL
833.0
100 YR. ELEV.
834.43 `S
5.
t
Property Description: CARML, 0 NI S'Cp�.
a Add tion Thirty—Three n dN na, as plat thereof recorded as Instrument `�Q�
Number 91-2 5567 in the Office of the Recorder of Hamilton County, Indiana. e N0
S0510 1
Prepared For: STATE OF
PLOT PLAN Elliot Wright Group STAT A N.<0.
4
599 Industrial Drive i N
House 'Type: Custom Carmel, Indiana 46032 S
UR;;,‘
Scale: 1" 20' Drawn by: DEM Residence Drawing No. 4
12635 Enclave Court, Suite 316 6 -183 `J
April 23, 2003 Revised: May 8, 2003 Carmel, Indiana 46032
1 \C HM4
i.P. BENCHMARK SURVEYING, INC.
A 0. Donn M. Scotten, Registered Land Surveyor
9855 Crosspoint Blvd., Suite 110, Indianapolis, IN 46256
j,
e,,,,, Phone (317) 841-1506 Fax (317) 841 —1507
RY1
Sanitary sewer lateral locotions are NOTE: Str. No. 109
approximate, and are to be field Top of Casting
verified by the contractor. THE FRONT BUILDING SETBACK LINE WAS T ast
ng
shall be y e within n on l e s foot chorizontal PLATTED AS 20 FEET THEY HAVE BEEN CHANGED
distance of pavement or concrete TO 15 FEET BY VARIANCE V- 20 -93.
including driveways sidewalks.
Driveways within subdivision shall be
constructed of concrete or asphalt
material.
1 l
1
1 N
<S, 6/
1
1 °c/
s
1 1
i
U
U
ti 0
U
r)
(n
1 L `S
t (53 c i gy 0 0
s ue/
h w °tee S„ �ti BLDG. 34
/4N
Str. No. 110 coc si o
Top of Casting o g L. 4 l.
s, l
Elev. 837.16 1 s o o oP /r 00
ry A
es
Oe� b en
e a
1 400
6/
8
ti w
BLDG. 32 d LOT 33
POND
NORv1AL POOL
833.0
ilir 100 YR. ELEV.
834.43
5
i �\III I I III//��
Property Description: SCOT
Lot Number Thirty —Three (33) in ENCLAVE OP CARMEL, O� ;.''''glZi;:. l:,
an Addition in Hamilton County, Indiana, as per plat- thereof recorded as Instrument O;' o •.,�y
Numb 91-2 55 67 in the Office of the Recorder of Hamilton County, Indiana. No.
F--*: S0510 1
Prepared For: STATE OF EXHIBIT Elliot Wright Group l q TATE
599 Industrial Drive 1 4'7
House Type: Custom Carmel, Indiana 46032
Scale: 1" 20' Drawp/by: DEM Residence Drawing No.
12635 Enclave Court, StRe 31C 6 -183
\May 7, 2003 I Revised Carmel, Indiana 46032 1•
MAY -08 -2003 THU 08 :58 AM FAX NO, P. 03/03
Page 1 of 2
Ochs, James A
From: Lillig, Laurence M
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 3:34 PM
To: 'The Hechts'
Cc: Ochs, James A; Kendall, Jeff A
Subject: RE: Enclave Question
Mr. Hecht,
have visited the Division of Building Code Enforcement to investigate your concerns, and reviewed the site
plan submitted for The Enclave of Carmel, Lot 33, with Building Inspector Jim Ochs.
The Enclave of Carmel Subdivision, generally, has a Development Standards Variance approval (V- 14c -90) that
allows a reduction in the minimum aggregate side yard from fifteen feet to ten (10) feet. The site plan on file
shows an aggregate of 8.79 feet (4.71' 4,08'), This will need to be corrected by the applicant.
While The Enclave of Carmel Subdivision, generally. has a Development Standards Variance approval (V- 14a -90)
that allows a reduction in the minimum front yard from thirty -five feet to twenty (20) feet, there are eight Tots
including Lot 33 that have a Development Standards Variance approval (V- 20b -93) that allows a reduction in
the minimum front yard from thirty -five feet to fifteen (15) feet. However, The Enclave of Carmel Subdivision,
generally, has a Development Standards Variance approval (V- 14d -90) that allows a reduction in the minimum
width at building line from eighty feet to forty -eight (48) feet. Therefore. regardless of the minimum fifteen -foot
front yard setback requirement on Lot 33, the width of the lot at the building line MUST be a minimum of forty-
eight feet From the site plan that is in the file, it does not appear that this requirement has been met.
The Division of Building Code Enforcement will contact the builder to apprise him of the need to either revise his
plans. or file additional Development Standards Variance applications with the Board of Zoning Appeals.
If I can be of any further service, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Laurence M. Lillig, Jr.
Planning Zoning Administrator
Department of Community Services
City of Carmel, Indiana
Original Message
From: The Hechts [mailto :thehechts@ inter- linc.net)
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 5:26 PM
To: Laurence Lillig
Subject: FW: Enclave Question
This may be a duplicate, if so, please delete.
Laurence,
We need your interpretation on something. Elliott Wright have submitted plans to build on Lot #33 in the
Enclave, The question is regarding the minimum setback. This is a pie shaped lot with plans to build a
rectangle house on it. Therefore, at the front of the house, which has been placed with the min 15'
setback, there is 4.71' between house and property line on one side and 4.08' on the other side. This is
1.21' less than the required 10 aggregate side yard, but it is only at the corner. As you move back along
the side of the house, the side yard quickly exceeds the requirement. How do you administer this type of
situation?
5/8/2003
MAY -08 -2003 THU 08:58 AM FAX' Na P, 02/U3
ENCOMPASS NOTEPAD 05/07411 PAGE 1
NOTES FOR: 03050009 BLDG 1 PR
DATE TIME. NOTE TEXT OPERATOR
2003 -05 -07 08:40:05 1 Sent to Jeff Kendall for further jochs
zoning review.
2003 -05 -07 10:36:17 1 Deck at rear of house encroaches into jochs
the drainage and lake maintenance
easement. Redesign deck out of
easement.
2 Do arrows on both sides of this lot
indicate a special situation for
drainage? Be very specific.
3 Provide basement floor finish
elevation to determine if windows on
rear of house are above the 100 year
elevation of
the pond.
2003 -05 -07 15:01:26 Laurance Lillig inquired about this lot jochs
from an e-mail from Don Hecht. Further
review by Laurence revealed that:
1 Provide width of lot at building
line. building width must equal or
exceed 48 feet.
2 Space between house and property line
must equal 10 feet or more minimum.
TOTAL LINES OF NOTES: 22
MAY -08 -2003 THU 08 :58 AM FAX NO. P. 01/03
CITY OF CARMEL
Q� C•qi 4'i* DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES
ia TRANSMITTAL
y 'ro 14 00
Date: 0 7
To:
LA <5ker"
Fax QC(6 779<
Number: UU
From: Jim Ochs, Building Inspector
Dept. of Community Services
One Civic Square
Carmel, IN 46032
email: jochs®ci.carmeLin.ua
Phone, 317- 571 -2476 Fax 317- 571 -2499
The material you requested For your information
or review and correction Cl For approval
Subject: Ne X 7-4
Number of pages: 3
NOTES:
s:perrnitstrrensmatal for Ochs
w
ti� ►i' u�� a t CITY OF CARMEL
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES
l ip s� Division of Planning Zoning
�N
,O SUMMARY of GRANT
Prepared:
1 February 2002
Prepared for:
Division of Building Code Enforcement
Department of Community Services
Prepared by:
Laurence M. Lillig, Jr.
Planning Zoning Administrator
Division of Planning Zoning
Department of Community Services
Re: The Enclave of Carmel Subdivision
Secondary Plat (74 -90 SP)
At the meeting held Tuesday, October 2, 1990, the Carmel/Clay Plan Commission's
Subdivision Committee took the following action regarding the petition filed by Sheila A. Marshall
of Coots of Coots Henke Wheeler on behalf of Eaton Lauth, Inc.:
APPROVED: Docket No. 74 -90 SP, a Secondary Plat application to plat forty-nine (49) Lots on
10.89± acres to be known as The Enclave of Carmel Subdivision. The Committee voted
three (3) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition.
Cross Reference:
23 -90 PP
V -14 -90
V -20 -93
If I can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 317.571.2417.
ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571 -2417
Page 2
Docket No. 74 -90 SP
r
Sincerely,
r nce M. Lillig, Jr.
Planning Zoning Administrator
Department of Community Services
Cc: James Ochs, DOCS, Building Inspector
Jeff Kendall, DOCS, Building Commissioner
ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571 -2417
II
1 if J�// /o� CAR
0&,,
0 lia
CITY OF CARMEL
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES
it Division of Planning Zoning
7 SUMMARY of GRANT
Prepared:
1 February 2002
Prepared for:
Division of Building Code Enforcement
Department of Community Services
Prepared by:
Laurence M. Lillig, Jr.
Planning Zoning Administrator
Division of Planning Zoning
Department of Community Services
Re: The Enclave of Carmel Subdivision
Primary Plat Subdivision Waivers (23 -90 PP
At the meeting held Tuesday, August 21, 1990, the Carmel/Clay Plan Commission took the
following action regarding petitions filed by E. Davis Coots of Coots Henke Wheeler on behalf
of Eaton Lauth, Inc.:
APPROVED: Docket No. 23 -90 PP, a Primary Plat petition to plat fifty (50) Lots on 10.89±
acres to be known as The Enclave of Carmel Subdivision. The Commission voted twelve
(12) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition.
APPROVED: Docket No. 23 -90a SW, a Subdivision Waiver petition to vary Section 6.3.1 of the
Subdivision Control Ordinance, in order to permit less than one hundred fifty <150) feet
between the intersections of East 126 Street Melark Drive and Enclave Circle
Melark Drive. The Commission voted twelve (12) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby
approving the petition.
APPROVED: Docket No 23 -90b SW, a Subdivision Waiver petition to vary Section 6.3.15 of
the Subdivision Control Ordinance, in order to permit a residential street (Melark Drive)
to be constructed with curves having radii less than 150 <150). The Commission voted
twelve (12) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition.
Note: The seven Subdivision Waivers outlined in this Summary were not originally assigned Docket Nos. The assigning of separate Docket
Nos. for each Ordinance Section was done in January 2002 to aid electronic record keeping.
ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571 -2417
Page 2
Docket No. 23 -90 PP
APPROVED: Docket No. 23 -90c SW, a Subdivision Waiver petiti to vary Section 6.3.16 of
the Subdivision Control Ordinance, in order to permit less than fifty <50) feet between
reversed curves on Enclave Court. The Commission voted twelve (12) in favor, zero (0)
opposed, thereby approving the petition.
APPROVED: Docket No. 23 -90d SW, a Subdivision Waiver petition to vary Section 6.5.1 of the
Subdivision Control Ordinance, in order to permit Lots 10, 14 -21, 23 -26, 30 -39, 42 -43,
46 -49 to be platted with less than fifty <50) feet of frontage at the right -of -way line.
The Commission voted twelve (12) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the
petition.
APPROVED: Docket No. 23 -90e SW, a Subdivision Waiver petition to vary Section 6.5.2 of the
Subdivision Control Ordinance, in order to permit several irregular lots to be platted. The
Commission voted twelve (12) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition.
APPROVED: Docket No. 23 -90f SW, a Subdivision Waiver petition to vary Section 6.5.3 of the
Subdivision Control Ordinance, in order to permit the twenty -foot (20') planting strip
parallel to State Road 431 to coincide with a ten -foot (10') drainage and utility easement
along the backs of Lots 35 -40 46 -49. The Commission voted eleven (11) in favor, one
(1) opposed, thereby approving the petition.
APPROVED: Docket No. 23 -90g SW, a Subdivision Waiver petition to vary Section 8.9:
Sidewalks of the Subdivision Control Ordinance, in order to eliminate sidewalks on the
north side of Melark Drive east of Lot 12, and to eliminate the sidewalk on the south side
of Enclave Circle west of Lot 49. The Commission voted twelve (12) in favor, zero (0)
opposed, thereby approving the petition.
If I can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 317.571.2417.
Sincerely,
L ure ce M. Lillig, Jr.
Planning Zoning Administrator
Department of Community Services
Cc: James Ochs, DOCS, Building Inspector
Jeff Kendall, DOCS, Building Commissioner
2 Lot Nos. cited in this Summary are the numbers assigned per the Secondary Plat of The Enclave of Carmel Subdivision (Docket No. 74 -90 SP).
ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571 -2417
:.a
ei C OF CARMEL.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITYSERVICES
g I: 3 Division of Planning Zoning
G p
SUMMARY of GRANT
Prepared:
1 February 2002
Prepared for:
Division of Building Code Enforcement
Department of Community Services
Prepared by:
Laurence M. Lillig, Jr.
Planning Zoning Administrator
Division of Planning Zoning
Department of Community Services
Re: The Enclave of Carmel Subdivision
Developmental Standards Variances (V- 14 -90)
At the meeting held Monday, February 26, 1990, the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals
took the following action regarding petitions filed by John C. Hart, Jr., on behalf of Eaton Lauth,
Inc.:
APPROVED with Conditions: Docket No. V- 14a -90, a petition to vary Section 8.4.2: Minimum
Front Yard of the R- 2/Residence District Ordinance in order to allow all lots to encroach fifteen
(15) feet into the thirty- five -foot (35') Minimum Front Yard, yielding a twenty -foot (20')
Minimum Front Yard within The Enclave of Carmel Subdivision. The Board voted four (4) in
favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition.
APPROVED with Conditions: Docket No. V- 14b -90, a petition to vary Section 8.4.3: Minimum
Side Yard of the R- 2/Residence District Ordinance, which requires a five -foot (5') Minimum
Side Yard, in order to permit a zero -foot (0') Minimum Side Yard within The Enclave of
Carmel Subdivision. The Board voted four (4) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the
petition.
APPROVED with Conditions: Docket No. V- 14c -90, a petition to vary Section 8.4.4: Minimum
Aggregate of Side Yard of the R- 2/Residence District Ordinance, which requires a fifteen -foot
(15') Minimum Aggregate of Side Yard, in order to permit a ten -foot (10') Minimum
ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571 -2417
Page 2
Docket No. V -14 -90
Aggregate Side Yard within The Enclave of Carmel Subdivision. The Board voted four (4) in
favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition.
APPROVED with Conditions: Docket No. V- 14d -90, a petition to vary Section 8.4.6: Minimum i u n
Lot Width of the R- 2/Residence District Ordinance, which requires an eighty-foot 8
Minimum Lot Width, in order to permit a forty-eight-foot vd four (4) in favor, zero (0) opposed,
The Enclave of Carmel Subdivision. Th e Board ote
thereby approving the petition.
APPROVED with Conditions: Docket No. V- 14e -90, a petition to vary Section 8.4.7: Minimum
Lot Area of the R- 2/Residence District Ordinance, which requires a ten thousand- square -foot
Minimum Lot Area, in order to permit a four thousand three hundred fifty -six- square -foot
(4356) Minimum Lot Area within The Enclave of Carmel Subdivision. The Board voted four
(4) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition.
APPROVED with Conditions: Docket No. V- 14f -90, a petition to vary Section 8.4.9: Maximum
Lot Coverage of the R- 2/Residence District Ordinance, which requires a thirty-five e aximum L n t
(35 Maximum Lot Coverage, in order to permit a forty -five percent (45
Coverage within The Enclave of Carmel Subdivision. The Board voted four (4) in favor, zero
(0) opposed, thereby approving the petition.
APPROVED with Conditions: Docket No. V- 14g -90, a petition to vary Section 23A.2: Minimum
Front Yard of the SR 431/Keystone Avenue Corridor Overlay Zone Ordinance, which requires a
one hundred twenty -foot (120') Minimum Front Yard along SR 431, in order to permit a twenty
foot (20') Minimum Front Yard along SR 431 within The Enclave of Carmel Subdivision.
The Board voted four (4) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition.
The aforementioned Developmental Standards Variances were approved with the
following Conditions and Commitments as submitted by the petitioner:
Statement Supporting Variance
The requested variances permit the construction of a high quality residential
subdivision utilizing a waterscape theme throughout the development. To assure the
adjacent residents of the quality of the subdivision, that the development will be built by
the applicant in conjunction with Hansen Horn Group, Inc. and that the property
not be rezoned R-4, the developer has agreed with the adjacent residents to proceed on
a variance application. The variance, if granted, would be personal to the project and
would self- extinguish if Eaton Lauth Community Development Company or its
successor or other entity owned by the principals of Eaton Lauth terminated their
interest in the development by sale or otherwise other than to the end buyer.
To that extent, petitioner has met with adjacent homeowners to display the
project and seek their input and support.
Commitments to the adjacent property owners regarding financing, landscaping
and area drainage improvements are a part of this application.
ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571 -2417
Page 3
Docket No. V -14 -90
If I can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 317.571.2417.
r
Sincerely,
Laurence M. Lillig, Jr.
Planning Zoning Administrator
Department of Community Services
Cc: James Ochs, DOCS, Building Inspector
Jeff Kendall, DOCS, Building Commissioner
ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571 -2417
2
n.
co
V
N
M
O
O
N
N
e—
N
2
A
C�
4 W V e Z ia SNNH82JIV� fi T N 4
d o- a v �>�i x_a I s° ,�R.: Z f
V $5,00, es�3 �aC`r�. k r� ea t.": f €r �x i2
a .4.44 Q 21a H D I H N AG 1. „,..,14 Q i� b
4 1
4 Q 2 1a HIJ L. i�j 5 xs t0 A. 1
K X49 t,s<_.... .,e} `C, 0 1 Al "w�ri 4, n h`5+'i V ?I
w s V a w -0: I "l J
r .1. s" 'x7s" w s; i a ,"�*�,�,E .�e a 0 v. 1 4.; rs '',V u w UANe ot,itti J 1 tip* d ,1P" M
MELARKDR•
T
2 1 i.e
.t, x F T4" 'id a z�' �e' pi f 'w w
LL k„
a r. q Jz r 1
g.
.1,A' MO HAW ILL D R
q Q a I.L u s r i 9 rs' ,-S`f i
fi r A ai� a
Its.
x Z, o• K 4 °r: "x" r" t t a x LL
a e baH St/ A SH DRS t. 4 0 o
may X v;g
t' t i i t S s� I ,y Q fv r x V '1 i� ^Sm. M O U
/iv,
k m �r t a z fir 'n�.;
�e ti. "'�"a3 3 +r s `a *i e i 't® 'a .G" I L
i
8 k, t a r 0 ti, q y ATt s� b. o 's 1 O fA 4 ,1 1.5 m z e fi ti
ORD LN_N o KINZ AVE z.� Via.
N
7
C
C
O
E
W
U
1
6.
e
oiii"efrir47-------. CITY OF CARME
o G, rr DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES
S Division of Planning Zoning
C SUMMARY of GRANT
Prepared:
1 February 2002
Prepared for:
Division of Building Code Enforcement
Department of Community Services 6
Prepared by: A h
6 1 4
Laurence M. Lillig, Jr. r f
Planning Zoning Administrator t /'�u G.
Division of Planning Zoning 6,,
Department of Community Services 11 1.
r
Re: The Enclave of Carmel Subdivision
Developmental Standards Variances (V- 20 -93) 11- '1
At the meeting held Monday, May 24, 1993, the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals
took the following action regarding petitions filed by Richard K. DeRose on behalf of the J.C. Hart
Co.:
APPROVED: Docket No. V- 20a -93, a petition to vary Section 8.4.5: Minimum Rear Yard of the
R- 2/Residence District Ordinance on Lots 24 -27, 30 -33, and 47 -49 in order to allow five
(5) feet of encroachment into the required twenty -foot (20') Minimum Rear Yard,
yielding a fifteen -foot (15') Minimum Rear Yard for the aforementioned Lots within
The Enclave of Carmel Subdivision. The Board voted four (4) in favor, zero (0) opposed,
thereby approving the petition.
APPROVED: Docket No. V- 20b -93, a petition to vary Section 8.4.2: Minimum Front Yard of
the R- 2/Residence District Ordinance on Lots 30 -33, 45, and 47 -49 in order to allow
twenty (20) feet of encroachment into the required thirty -five -foot (35') Minimum Front
Yard, yielding a fifteen -foot (15') Minimum Front Yard for the aforementioned Lots
within The Enclave of Carmel Subdivision. The Board voted four (4) in favor, zero (0)
opposed, thereby approving the petition.
APPROVED: Docket No. V- 20c -93, a petition to vary Section 8.4.6: Minimum Lot Width of the
R- 2/Residence District Ordinance, which requires an eighty -foot (80') Minimum Lot
ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571 -2417
Page 2
r
Docket No. V -20 -93
Width, in order to allow the Lot Width as measured at a minimum' `fifteen -foot (15')
Building Setback Line on Lots 30 -33, 47- 49 The Enc /ave of Carmel Subdivision.
The Board voted four (4) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition.
If I can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 317.571.2417.
Sincerely,
Ci
L aure e M. Lillig, Jr.
Planning Zoning Administrator
Department of Community Services
Cc: James Ochs, DOCS, Building Inspector
Jeff Kendall, DOCS, Building Commissioner
ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571 -2417