HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication CITY OF N
oLL�
2_4,/
s CARMEL
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES
i i 4 Division of Planning Zoning
SUMMARY of GRANT
Prepared:
1 February 2002
Prepared for:
Division of Building Code Enforcement
Department of Community Services
Prepared by:
Laurence M. Lillig, Jr.
Planning Zoning Administrator
Division of Planning Zoning
Department of Community Services
Re: The Enclave of Carmel Subdivision
Developmental Standards Variances (V- 14 -90
At the meeting held Monday, February 26, 1990, the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals
took the following action regarding petitions filed by John C. Hart, Jr., on behalf of Eaton Lauth,
Inc.:
APPROVED with Conditions: Docket No. V- 14a -90, a petition to vary Section 8.4.2: Minimum
Front Yard of the R- 2/Residence District Ordinance in order to allow all lots to encroach
fifteen (15) feet into the thirty- five -foot (35') Minimum Front Yard, yielding a twenty
foot (20') Minimum Front Yard within The Enclave of Carmel Subdivision. The Board
voted four (4) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition.
APPROVED with Conditions: Docket No. V- 14b -90, a petition to vary Section 8.4.3: Minimum
Side Yard of the R -2 /Residence District Ordinance, which requires a five -foot (5')
Minimum Side Yard, in order to permit a zero -foot (0') Minimum Side Yard within
1
Note: The seven Developmental Standards Variances outlined in this Summary were originally approved under a single Docket No. The
assigning of separate Docket Nos. for each Ordinance Section was done in January 2002 to aid electronic record keeping.
ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571 -2417
Page 2
Docket No. V -14 -90
The Enclave of Carmel Subdivision. The Board voted four (4) in favor, zero (0) opposed,
thereby approving the petition.
1
APPROVED with Conditions: Docket No. V- 14c -90, a petition to vary Section 8.4.4: Minimum
Aggregate of Side Yard of the R -2 /Residence District Ordinance, which requires a
fifteen -foot (15') Minimum Aggregate of Side Yard, in order to permit a ten -foot (10')
Minimum Aggregate Side Yard within The Enclave of Carmel Subdivision. The Board
voted four (4) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition.
APPROVED with Conditions: Docket No. V- 14d -90, a petition to vary Section 8.4.6: Minimum
Lot Width of the R -2 /Residence District Ordinance, which requires an eighty -foot (80')
Minimum Lot Width, in order to permit a forty- eight -foot (48') Minimum Lot Width
within The Enclave of Carmel Subdivision. The Board voted four (4) in favor, zero (0)
opposed, thereby approving the petition.
APPROVED with Conditions: Docket No. V- 14e -90, a petition to vary Section 8.4.7: Minimum
Lot Area of the R- 2/Residence District Ordinance, which requires a ten thousand- square-
foot Minimum Lot Area, in order to permit a four thousand three hundred fifty -six-
square -foot (4356) Minimum Lot Area within The Enclave of Carmel Subdivision.
The Board voted four (4) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition.
APPROVED with Conditions: Docket No. V- 14f -90, a petition to vary Section 8.4.9: Maximum
Lot Coverage of the R- 2/Residence District Ordinance, which requires a thirty- ye
percent (35 Maximum Lot Coverage, in order to permit a forty -five percen 45
Maximum Lot Coverage within The Enclave of Carmel Subdivision. The Boar
four (4) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby approving the petition.
APPROVED with Conditions: Docket No. V- 14g -90, a petition to vary Section 23A.2: Minimum
Front Yard of the SR 431/Keystone Avenue Corridor Overlay Zone Ordinance, which
requires a one hundred twenty -foot (120') Minimum Front Yard along SR 431, in order
to permit a twenty -foot (20') Minimum Front Yard along SR 431 within The Enclave
of Carmel Subdivision. The Board voted four (4) in favor, zero (0) opposed, thereby
approving the petition.
The aforementioned Developmental Standards Variances were approved with the
following Conditions and Commitments as submitted by the petitioner:
Statement Supporting Variance
The requested variances permit the construction of a high quality residential
subdivision utilizing a waterscape theme throughout the development. To assure the
adjacent residents of the quality of the subdivision, that the development will be built by
the applicant in conjunction with Hansen Horn Group, Inc. and that the property would
not be rezoned R -4, the developer has agreed with the adjacent residents to proceed on
a variance application. The variance, if granted, would be personal to the project and
would self- extinguish if Eaton Lauth Community Development Company or its
successor or other entity owned by the principals of Eaton Lauth terminated their
interest in the development by sale or otherwise other than to the end buyer.
ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571 -2417
Page 3
Docket No. V -14 -90
To that extent, petitioner has met with adjacent homeowners to display the
project and seek their input and support.
Commitments to the adjacent property owners regarding financing, landscaping
and area drainage improvements are a part of this application.
If I can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 317.571.2417.
Sincerely,
Laurence M. Lillig, Jr.
Planning Zoning Administrator
Department of Community Services
Cc: James Ochs, DOCS, Building Inspector
Jeff Kendall, DOCS, Building Commissioner
ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571 -2417