Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket Two Sisters, lU 110 3 "A Ave NE Carmel, IN 46032 Phone: 311- 816 -1010 FAX: 311 -816 -1013 December 12, 2003 To: Carmel /Clay BZA Members Re: Docket 03110007, Request to allow Tight office designation and signage Docket VIII -03 #03110006, Request to allow current driveway parking Here is our zoning variance application for 110 3 Ave NE in Carmel. To the best of our ability and understanding, we've completed all forms, contacted adjoining property owners, prepared drawings, measured, photographed, and planted according to code guidelines. It's been a great learning process for us and having done all the work we feel even more convinced this variance would be not only in our interest but also the interest of our neighborhood and community. When we purchased this property, our intent was to improve the structure and enhance the appearance and use of a residential area that was somewhat rundown. Our property is one of two at the end of the block and the only one facing 3 Avenue. It faces one side of the Masonic Lodge, and abuts a Carmel High School parking lot, a commercial office building, and a house zoned B3 and used as an office on 1St Street. Not surprisingly perhaps, homebuyers looking to move into the neighborhood generally tried to get `deeper' into the neighborhood and further away from commercial development. Our property sat for months, was completely overgrown and altogether in disrepair. As part of the Old Town Overlay Zone, the requested variance for our property promotes the purpose and intent of that zone as set forth in Chapter 23D.0 of the Zoning Ordinance by: 1. Rehabilitating and developing a lot that, due to awkward placement adjacent to commercial endeavor made residential re -sale difficult. Slow re -sale caused the property to become more rundown bringing down its sales price and accordingly, t neighborhood property values. 2. By allowing small business owners to acquire affordable properties, it spurs commercial activity without causing breakdown of the residential areas. It's a limited way of attracting new business to Old Town while upgrading flagging neighborhood areas by providing a `buffer' zone between residential areas and full commercial endeavor. As a property allowing Tight office use, we have people in our house, in our neighborhood during the day when many neighbors are gone to work. Earlier neighborhood complaints of CHS students trampling through yards, congregating around empty houses, are no longer problems. When the neighbors return from work in the evening, our office is closed. That means less traffic during the evening and weekends when families are out, with the bonus of a structure that adds value and curb appeal to the neighborhood. It is our intent and commitment to improve all properties we acquire. We own a Carmel business and we live here. We have a stake in making our city a place known for supporting its businesses AND maintaining its neighborhoods. One way to do that is by allowing appropriate and creative changes, like this light office zoning variance, that enhance both. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, L f n M. Long Christina R. Mowery