HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence Conn, Angelina V
From: Booker, Randall CAR [Randall.Booker @carrier.utc.com]
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 5:34 AM
To: Conn, Angelina V
Subject: J C Hart Development at 116th and College
Dear Ms Conn:
I attended a preliminary meeting with J C Hart representatives in November in which they proposed their intent to request
rezoning of the parcel of land at the corner of 116"' Street and College Ave. I have not seen any further communication
regarding their intent.
At the meeting it was mentioned that you might be the zoning representative assigned to review this request.
My community association at the Townes at Guilford were taking a formal position that was concerned mostly with the
street connection with the proposed community, more a transportation issue. However, there were several of us with
property directly adjoining the proposed community that are more concerned with the separation of the improvements
from our community, in particular the northeast most building in the proposal with a parking lot a mere 25 feet away from
some of our patios!
Today our community is well separated from its neighbors. The commercial property to our west is separated by a large
berm and greenspace of at least 100 feet between streets /parking. The condominium and townhome property to our
north is separated by a large greenspace ...at least 100 feet from the streets /parking area.
As you move forward on this request please keep in mind our desire to preserve the same separation of space that we
enjoy today.
Sincerely,
Randall Booker
817 Ivy Lane
Carmel, IN 46032
317 240 -5156 office
574 312 -0720 cell
randall.booker@carrier.utc.com
1
Conn, Angelina V
From: Pohlman, Jesse M. [Jesse. Pohlman @bakerd.com]
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 12:15 PM
To: Randall.Booker @carrier.utc.com
Cc: Hardin, Steven D.; Todd @homeisjchart.com; Conn, Angelina V
Subject: RE: J C Hart Development at 116th and College
Attachments: Revised Current Plan.pdf; Original Plan.pdf
Mr. Booker
Good afternoon. Ms. Conn forwarded your e -mail to me today. I'm sorry if you have not been apprised yet of JC Hart's
revisions to its concept plan; hopefully, this email will answer your questions.
At our November neighbors' meeting, the neighbors indicated concerns regarding connectivity and the proximity of the
northern -most building and parking area. Following that meeting, JC Hart considered how to accommodate those
concerns and then revised their concept plan to remove the connectivity and relocate the northern -most building and
parking area. The revised concept plan (attached to this email) was presented to the Plan Commission subcommittee on
December 1, and it was provided at that time also to the neighbors who attended that meeting. The attached revised
plan also shows the landscaping and buffer plan in more detail. The revised plan then also was presented to the full Plan
Commission at its December 15 public meeting.
Again, I apologize for not sending you previously a copy of the updated concept plan. After you have an opportunity to
review the revised drawings, please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.
Jesse
JESSE M. POHLMAN
LAND USE CONSULTANT
T: 317.569.4836 1 F: 317.237.8476 1 MAIN: 317.569.9600
BAKER DANIELS LLP 1 WWW.BAKERDANIELS.COM
CARMEL OFFICE (mailing address) 1 600 E. 96 STREET, SUITE 600 1 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46240
NOBLESVILLE OFFICE 1 23 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET 1 NOBLESVILLE, IN 46060
From: Booker, Randall CAR mailto: Randall.Booker @carrier.utc.com]
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 5:34 AM
To: Conn, Angelina V
Subject: 3 C Hart Development at 116th and College
Dear Ms Conn:
I attended a preliminary meeting with J C Hart representatives in November in which they proposed their intent to request
rezoning of the parcel of land at the corner of 116 Street and College Ave. I have not seen any further communication
regarding their intent.
At the meeting it was mentioned that you might be the zoning representative assigned to review this request.
My community association at the Townes at Guilford were taking a formal position that was concerned mostly with the
street connection with the proposed community, more a transportation issue. However, there were several of us with
property directly adjoining the proposed community that are more concerned with the separation of the improvements
from our community, in particular the northeast most building in the proposal with a parking lot a mere 25 feet away from
some of our patios!
1
Conn, Angelina V
From: Conn, Angelina V
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 2:38 PM
To: 'Susan Westermeier'; Rider, Kevin D; 'Rick Ripma'; 'Madeleine Torres'
Cc: Boone, Rachel M.; Hancock, Ramona B; Hollibaugh, Mike P; Holmes, Christine B; Forwarding
E -mail, Dierckman, Leo; 'irizarryhm @lilly.com'
Subject: FW: Docket No. 09090017 OA: 116th and College PUD REVISED SITE PLAN
Attachments: site plan updated 11- 30.pdf
Good afternoon, Committee members
1 am sorry to keep emailing you about this particular agenda item, but here is the petitioner's revised conceptual site
plan and email about updates. The petitioner will hand out paper copies of the revised conceptual site plan tonight.
-Angie Conn, Planning Administrator
From: Hardin, Steven D. [mailto:Steven.Hardin @bakerd.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 2:06 PM
To: Conn, Angelina V
Cc: Hollibaugh, Mike P
Subject: JC Hart: Docket No. 09090017 OA: 116th and College PUD (116th Street Centre, Ph 2)
Angie and Mike,
Thank you for your work on this development. Here is an update for you. On October 23, we mailed a letter to
the neighbors and invited them to a meeting to discuss the proposed development plan. On October 24, we
received an email from Mr. Long, a neighbor in the townhome project to the north. On October 25, we
responded to Mr. Long and provided him additional information about the development. On November 6, we
received another email from Mr. Long to which we responded that same day with additional information as
requested. On November 11, we held a neighbors' meeting and discussed the development in detail with the
neighbors. On November 12, we received another email from Mr. Long. On November 17, we advised Mr.
Long in person, prior to the Plan Commission public hearing, that we would be meeting and working with the
DOCS staff prior to the committee meeting in order to explore alternatives to address the neighbors' issues.
As you know, we have meet with you and Mike to discuss the neighbors' connectivity concern, the concept plan
and the City's request for an east/west connection road. Consistent with our meeting with you and Mike last
Wednesday (the day before Thanksgiving), we now have revised our concept plan to: (1) eliminate the building
immediately adjacent to the north east property line; (2) remove the connectivity between the townhomes and
JC Hart's development; and (3) provide for a future right -of -way dedication in the area requested by the DOCS
staff. A copy of the updated concept plan is attached. Please feel free to forward this email to the committee
members. We look forward to continuing to work with you, and we'll see you this evening. We'll bring
additional copies of the updated concept plan to the meeting to provide to the committee and the neighbors.
Regards,
STEVEN D. HARDIN 1 Partner 1 P: 317.569.4833 1 F: 317.569.4800 1 C: 317.506.7960
Baker Daniels LLP www.bakerdaniels.com
Carmel Office 1 600 E. 96 Street, Suite 6001 Indianapolis, IN 46240
Noblesville Office 123 South Eight Street 1 Noblesville, IN 46060
1
r
i f u e
COlI e
ege P�
.L -"4 62 ;Zr.0;'
0 0',,,'''....."&„.,,,,:;,,..,_, ,-.1ii.; 4 e„ ,,r_ ..e.,,,;2
ft 6
ru
b m t
r° 17 -4•TF0,17. 4.1
14 a i Vt .e' y o f
LS O F xi\ 3
'1s
k I
r 1
i 4" tom r Cl `e l
up
r-t)®
Q� f: si
4 �f
s-,:�? 1 o i PPP v :l
c o -e o�_
a u v _t O
k.- L #`14, 2` i nr
F-- w N
CZ CD CZ) v,�
C-) ICISSO—isMe:—Pr—
w
1 ,9
t b
CD U, cia 'c,)
(1)
EA
II cp
o''d
o r---
Pa
Ct o
p-4 o
PI o
V?virli CD
en w
ct o et o 0 0
r
o r r
tip F b!)
4 n 1
om 1_A
w Aw F
,n f s
�i� it i� L
j.0.41,9,4t4 oeli 1
d�
P 0 0
cn
V CD V .,4' LI)
ct p
e. 10;
',°""t _a_ tom -A- 10 Q
0 tt
g.,
0 N w
o
n
:kV
ii„„,„„,„■
a nu and a
K
Conn, Angelina V
From: Judith LeDonne Hicks [jalh @att.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 1:35 PM
To: Conn, Angelina V
Subject: Docket No. 09090017 OA: 116th and College PUD (116th Street Centre, Ph 2)
Good afternoon Ms. Conn. I am a homeowner at Townhomes at Guilford and have been in recent communication with
Jeremy Long regarding the proposed development at 116th and College. I would like to take this opportunity to express my
concerns specifically in reference to the buffering proposed between this development and the apartments planned. It is my
opinion that there is not enough space being planned between parking and the back of several of the townhomes on Ivy
Lane. From the plans presented by J.C. Hart, I also believe that there is not enough being done to block light from the
head -in parking planned, that would be directed toward the townhomes.
Having been a member of the Townhomes at Guilford's Board of Directors for the past year, to my knowledge, we have not
been approached by J.C. Hart to discuss their plans for this parcel. I was only made aware of this development by Jeremy
Long, a homeowner who abuts the property and was a recipient of a certified letter. I will taking this matter up with the other
Board members and look to have a discussion soon with the developer. In the mean time, I plan to attend this evening
Special Studies meeting in order to gather more information on the status of this proposed change to the land use.
Thank you for your attention to my email and please feel free to contact me for any reason.
Judith Hicks
796 Ivy Lane
Carmel, IN 46032
815 -8177
1
Conn, Angelina V
From: Jeremy Long [jlong @c21scheetz.com]
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 4:51 PM
To: Conn, Angelina V
Subject: Docket No. 09090017 OA: 116th and College PUD (116th Street Centre, Ph 2)
Attachments: West view; North view; IMG_1648_1.JPG
Angie, so I have thought about what I most object to and it has changed a little from my first entail but it is
basically the same. I have attached a few photos as well. They are views of what I call the 'butler' between our
community and the communities around us (to the West. commercial and to the North residential). I officially got
no response back from the developer JC Hart nor their attorney on my original email, which is to bad.
Communication is key when making decisions as is listening to others...all of which I think they have fallen short
of. I mil hopping to find some synergetic resolve to my concerns and their proposal for development.
I also want to clarify as I keep hearing that tile- 'city' wants to connect to our community and that we have to for
'legal reasons'. I gun not an attorney so I can not speak of legalities, but I was hoping you could enlighten me on
wily our community 'has' to connect? I have heard that our community only has one entrance and exit...so do a 101
of communities and subdivisions, why would that matter? Is it because the new plans for the development do
away with the old plans in which there was a 117th street: I have been gold that our streets arc private and that.
'wc' as homeowners are responsible for them?
I originally said I'd be OK with some type of connection but Now I am thinking NO...I do not want to be
connected. And if connected who then is responsible for the roads as currently our HOA collects money for
nlaintenaulce? I believe the proposed plan has plenty of access points to the proposed development...why do they
need to cut through the back of ours?
I am lirm on my opinion that the density of this project needs to be scaled back. Originally it would have been 80
or so townhomes. The proposed is well above that. I do believe there needs to be a better 'buffer' between the
properties as well as a fence airound the perimeter of the project. The fence would deter people from cutting
through as well as enclose that retention pound that is on the property. The photos show that the commercial is
basically hidden from view by a hill and then to the North there must be at least 30+ feet between our community
and the other. How much 'buffer' are they proposing?
The final photo 1S of Illy child and he and Illy faintly arc the main reason I do not want the connection. The main
reason I want green space. The main reason I want a perimeter fence. I-Iow many more cars will cut through to
access this development...too inany. My wile and I down sized to something wc thought was practical, sale and
made sense. We liked the fact that it was a small contained community. VVhen a car goes by I know if they live
here or not. Most of my neighbors either know me by sight or name and they know we have a little one as well as
a dog. I gull thinking on Illy family, the neighbors ainl future fa111111es...I do not want the connection, accessibility
nor size of this project to be built.
If you could please pass this along to Rick Rimpa, Susan Westermeier, and Kevin "Woody" Rider. I would like to
be there for the meeting but I may not be able to.
I thank you for your time as well as those on the council. I trust that the developer will LISTEN to the opinions
expressed by others and myself and then agree to COMMUNICATE until we can find a solution we both all feel
good about.
Jeremy Long, REALTOR GREEN
1
i t4 ,'4'f.
a
R
5 fi r'
n
i d
,4 r
„....r 7 4 ,.....fi g t.4., ,:i .4..., 7,, I rst,„::.,,,,,,,,,-,-,
if lir .4. Lir... A*
i
3
L k
y
r
,y
i
te
a� a' S
t
I
w
Carmel Plan Commission
Angelina Conn, Planning Administrator
Department of Community Services
One Civic Square
Carmel, IN 46032
Nov. 22, 2009
Re: Docket No. 09090017 OA: 116 and College PUD (116 Street Centre, Ph 2)
Members of the commission:
I own one of the units in the Townes at Guilford and have been a Carmel resident for 24
years.
I would like to voice my opposition to the proposed amendment to Ordinance Z- 484 -05:
116 Street Centre Planned Unit Development, located at the northeast corner of 116 St.
and College Ave., for the following reasons:
1. I believe the increased density proposed would have a negative impact on the
property values of the Townes at Guilford. My preference would be to leave the
current zoning unchanged and construct townhomes similar to the Townes at
Guilford.
2. The possible traffic connections with the proposed multi family units may create
significantly increased traffic flow through the Townes at Guilford, increasing the
traffic noise and risk to pedestrians and other vehicles.
3. The current drawings for the proposed multi family structures show very little
separation between the Townes and the proposed new buildings and parking on
the northeast section. This layout results in a parking lot at the property line with
little or no physical or visual separation from the townhomes to the north. I find
this to be unacceptable as an owner of one of those townhomes.
4. The addition of a pool and clubhouse will result in additional noise and traffic.
As noted in the executive summary by J. C. Hart, the proximity to the Monon
Center and Central Park makes this a prime location for residents. Increasing the
membership at the Monon Center rather than allowing another pool and
clubhouse to be built so close to this outstanding facility would better serve
Carmel.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Danny R. Connor
12046 Eden Glen Dr
Carmel, IN 46033
connorindy @mac.com
Conn, Angelina V
From: Pohlman, Jesse M. [Jesse.Pohlman @bakerd.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 11:21 AM
To: Conn, Angelina V
Subject: FW: Thank you for the meeting last night
Angie
Per our meeting yesterday, here is the e-mail that Mr. Long sent to us.
Jesse
From: Jeremy Long [mailto:jlong @c2lscheetz.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 1:36 PM
To: todd @homeisjchart.com; rsherman @weaversherman.com; Pohlman, Jesse M.
Subject: Thank you for the meeting last night
I wanted to thank you for the presentation last night. I think you all and the other representatives for the project
made a good presentation and answered the questions. I think the proposed project looks good and with a little
tweaking would look great. I look forward to seeing you all a subsequent meetings and trust we can all work
togcthcr.
I would like to voice my concerns and see if you could address their.
Could the density of the project be reduced by not building the building closest to our community and instead
have a buffer of green space. I believe it was stated that the unit would have around 15 units. I arn sure the lost
units revenue could be made up in over all rent values or possible tax incentives from the City? I too think the
dollar a square foot is low given that this location in Carmel is very desirable. It is why I choose to live here. And
also because of accessibility to the amenities, Meridian, Keystone at the crossing, 465 and the Moron. Not to
mention when finished a nice walk to the performing arts building and district.
The pool. Is it truly a necessity as the Monon Center's pool is just down the street? Your perspective tenants
could join the Monon Center and give it a much need economic boost. Could the owners of the community offer
a membership as a perk of renting(currently $380.00 for a single adult membership which can be paid monthly)?
I had a pool at the old house and I remember what a joy it was the first couple of seasons but the after that it was a
pain (maintenance, chemicals and mechanicals). And from a liability staridpoint...maybe the money saved by not
having a pool can pay for the perk. just a thought as I am sure the council would love to hear how you can help
the local economy (100+ new members to the Monon Center).
I think the road issue and connecting of the 2 communities was addressed to the point it sounds like there is a
very 'doable' way to make people happy.
And finally, as you can sec from my NAR (National Association of Realtors), GREEN designation as well as my
membership in the I JSGBC (US Green Build Council) I and one of those individuals who is concerned with
sustainability especially when it comes to housing. Please, Please, Please incorporate sonic 'green' aspects and if
already in place, please talk about them at the meetings /hearings. If you could build the project to LEED
certification I can promise you I will get you all the local support and press you can handle. Not only will I
personally become an advocate but. I'll get others. Be one of the first to do such a project. Be a Leader. If you
do not have any LEED AP professionals working for you or in house...I'l1 find them for you. If you are not
familiar with how to go through the process of certification...again I have the contacts and resources to help you.
i
And do not be mislead by the statistics out there that say it. COST to much to build to LEED standards (it costs
too much not 10), because if one looks at the long term benefits one would see it is the smart, economical, socially
responsible way to build.
Again, just my thoughts and please contact me with any questions or explanations you might have as to why the
project can not go in the proposed direction I suggested above. Think Green, Think Local and Think Long
Tenn (that might just make a good slogan for the project).
Respectfully,
Jeremy Long, REALTOR GREEN
Century 21 Scheetz
Brian Sanders Group
Member of USGBC- Indiana www.usgbc- in.org/
Office 317 705 -2500
Cellular 317- 513 -1229
Fax 317 573 -5182
website: www.jlongrealtv.com
Please consider the environment before printing this e -mail.
ATTENTION:
To ensure compliance with applicable Internal Revenue Service Regulations,
we inform you that any tax advice contained in this electronic message was
not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of
avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code.
This message and all its attachments are PRIVATE and may contain
information that is CONFIDENTIAL and PRIVILEGED.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender by reply
e -mail and delete the message immediately.
2
Hancock, Ramona B
From: Conn, Angelina V
Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 1:53 PM
To: Jeremy Long; Hancock, Ramona B
Subject: RE: 116th and College Pud (116th Street, Ph 2)
Yes. We can make copies of this email, and hand them out to the Plan Commission members at
their meeting tues night.
(ramona please make copies and distribute tues night. Thanks!)
angie
Original Message
From: Jeremy Long <jlong @c21scheetz.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 11:50 AM
To: aconn @carmel.in.gov <aconn @carmel.in.gov>
Subject: RE: 116th and College Pud (116th Street, Ph 2)
Angie, thank you so much for the information about this proposed development. The
developers had a meeting the other night and I went to it and what follows was an email I
sent to them and then thought I would send it along to you too. Please forgive me as I am
not familiar with how the 'process' all works but just want to make sure I do everything I
can to make sure my voice is heard. Please let me know what you think as I am looking to
you for guidance. I thank you for your time.
Email to the developers:
I would like to voice my concerns and see if you could address them.
Could the density of the project be reduced by not building the building closest to our
community and instead have a buffer of green space. I believe it was stated that the unit
would have around 15 units. I am sure the lost units revenue could be made up in over all
rent values or possible tax incentives from the City? I too think the dollar a square
foot is low given that this location in Carmel is very desirable. It is why I choose to
live here. And also because of accessibility to the amenities, Meridian, Keystone at the
crossing, 465 and the Monon. Not to mention when finished a nice walk to the performing
arts building and district.
The pool. Is it truly a necessity as the Monon Center's pool is just down the street?
Your perspective tenants could join the Monon Center and give it a much need economic
boost. Could the owners of the community offer a membership as a perk of
renting(currently $380.00 for a single adult membership which can be paid monthly)? I had
a pool at the old house and I remember what a joy it was the first couple of seasons but
the after that it was a pain (maintenance, chemicals and mechanicals). And from a
liability standpoint...maybe the money saved by not having a pool can pay for the perk.
Just a thought as I am sure the council would love to hear how you can help the local
economy (100+ new members to the Monon Center).
I think the road issue and connecting of the 2 communities was addressed to the point it
sounds like there is a very 'doable' way to make people happy.
And finally, as you can see from my NAR (National Association of Realtors), GREEN
designation as well as my membership in the USGBC (US Green Build Council) I am one of
those individuals who is concerned with sustainability especially when it comes to
housing. Please, Please, Please incorporate some 'green' aspects and if already in place,
please talk about them at the meetings /hearings. If you could build the project to LEED
certification I can promise you I will get you all the local support and press you can
handle. Not only will I personally become an advocate but I'll get others. Be one of the
first to do such a project. Be a Leader. If you do not have any LEED AP professionals
working for you or in house...I'11 find them for you. If you are not familiar with how to
1
go through the process of certification...again I have the contacts and resources to help
you. And do not be mislead by the statistics out there that say it COST to much to build
to LEED standards (it costs too much not to), because if one looks at the long term
benefits one would see it is the smart, economical, socially responsible way to build.
Again, just my thoughts and please contact me with any questions or explanations you might
have as to why the project can not go in the proposed direction I suggested above. Think
Green, Think Local and Think Long Term (that might just make a good slogan for the
project).
Respectfully,
Jeremy Long, REALTOR® GREEN
Century 21 Scheetz
Brian Sanders Group
Member of USGBC- Indiana https: /mail.century2latc.com /exchweb /bin /redir.asp?
URL= http: /www.usgbc- in.org> www.usgbc -in .org<http: /www.usgbc- in.org
Office 317 705 -2500
Cellular 317 513 -1229
Fax 317 573 -5182
website: www. jlongrealty. com <http: /www.jlongrealty.com
P Please consider the environment before printing this e -mail.
2
Conn, Angelina V
From: Pohlman, Jesse M. [Jesse. Pohlman@bakerd.com]
Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 9:45 AM
To: Conn, Angelina V
Cc: Hancock, Ramona B
Subject: 116th Street Centre Amendment I Plan Commission Packet
Attachments: 116th Street Centre PC Packet 2009- 11- 17.pdf
Angie
Attached please find a PDF of the Plan Commission packet that is being submitted today for the 116 Street Centre PUD
amendment.
In response to the DOCS preliminary review comments. (PETITIONER: please reply to the following):
1. Please provide an outline of the proposed changes to Z- 484 -05. [OUTLINED IN TAB 1 OF PACKET; FURTHER
DETAILED IN PROPOSED ORDINANCE AT TAB 5]
2. Assuming the Council approves the changes, will you submit a DP /ADLS application soon after? [NOTED AT END
OF PAGE AT TAB 1 OF PACKET]
3. Please provide a filled out /notarized affidavit of notice of public hearing (see application). [WILL BE SUBMITTED
p W/ PACKETS TODAY]
V 4. Provide the filled out /notarized Affidavit of the Public Notice Sign Placement. [WILL BE SUBMITTED W/
PACKETS TODAY]
r/S. Please provide copies of your correspondence to TAC members. [I HAVE COPIED YOU ON ALL OF OUR
CORRESPONDENCE W/ TAC MEMBERS]
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you.
Jesse
JESSE M. POHLMAN
LAND USE CONSULTANT
T: 317.569.4836 I E: 317.237.8476 I MAIN: 317.569.9600
BAKER DANIELS LLP 1 WWW.BAKERDANIELS.COM
CARMEL OFFICE (mailing address) 1 600 E. 96 STREET, SUITE 600 1 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46240
NOBLESVILLE OFFICE 1 23 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET 1 NOBLESVILLE, IN 46060
ATTENTION:
To ensure compliance with applicable Internal Revenue Service Regulations,
we inform you that any tax advice contained in this electronic message was
not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of
avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code.
This message and all its attachments are PRIVATE and may contain
information that is CONFIDENTIAL and PRIVILEGED.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender by reply
e -mail and delete the message immediately.
1
BAKERt DANIELS
EST 1863
JESSE M. POHLMAN BAKER DANIELS LLP
Land Use Consultant 600 East 96th Street, Suite 600
Direct 317.569.4836 Indianapolis, Indiana 46240
Fax 317.237.8476 Tel 317.569.9600 Fax 317.569.4800
jesse.pohlman @bakerd.com www.bakerdaniels.com
October 21, 2009
VIA E -MAIL (DLITTLEJOHW,CARMEL.IN.GOV)
Littlejohn, David W
Alternative Transportation Coordinator
City of Carmel
Department of Community Services
City of Carmel
One Civic Sq
Carmel, IN 46032
Re: 116 Street Centre PUD Amendment 1 Response to TAC Comments
Dear David:
Thank you for your comment letter dated October 14, 2009. Below, in italics, please find
responses to your comments. In addition, if the amendment ordinance is approved, then your
comments will be further addressed in detail with the submittal of the development's application
for DP /ADLS approval.
1) Please include sidewalks within the multi family area to provide direct pedestrian
connections within this section of the development.
We have added a Section 3.16 to the proposed amendment ordinance, as attached, which
requires "Sidewalks shall be provided throughout the Real Estate to provide direct
pedestrian connections within the Multi Family Area."
2) Please refer to the City of Carmel's Parking Ordinance in order to determine
appropriate number, locations, specifications and construction details for bicycle
parking.
We have duly noted. In addition, please note Section 3.14(E) of the proposed amendment
ordinance which requires and defaults to the City's Zoning Ordinance accordingly.
3) Please consider including long term covered bicycle parking with this development.
Your recommendation has been duly noted and will be taken into consideration upon the
submittal of the development's application for DP /ADLS approval.
BDDB01 5885550v1
Littlejohn, David W -2- October 21, 2009
If you have any questions or if these revisions do not adequately address your comments, then
please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you again for your review and comments.
Respectfully,
Jesse M. Pohlman
Land Use Consultant
cc: Angelina Conn
Todd May
BDDB01 5885550v1
10.21.2009
SPONSOR:
ORDINANCE Z
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CARMEL, INDIANA, AMENDING Z- 484 -05 116 STREET CENTRE
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ORDINANCE
An Ordinance Amending the 116 Street Centre
Planned Unit Development District Ordinance
WHEREAS, pursuant to Indiana Code §36 -7 -4 -600 et seq., the Common Council of the
City of Carmel, Indiana adopted Ordinance Z- 484 -05 establishing the 116 Street Centre
Planned Unit Development District;
WHEREAS, Section 31.06.04 of the Carmel Zoning Ordinance Z -289 (the "Zoning
Ordinance and Indiana Code §36 -7 -4 -1512 provides for the amendment of a Planned Unit
Development District;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Common Council of the City of
Carmel, Indiana that pursuant to Indiana Code §36 -7 -4 -600 et seq., and after docket number
09090017 OA having received a favorable recommendation by the Carmel Plan Commission on
Tuesday, [insert date], 2009, it hereby adopts this ordinance (this "Ordinance to amend the
116` Street Centre Planned Unit Development District Ordinance Z- 484 -05 (the "Original PUD
Ordinance and the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to read as follows:
Section 1. Applicability of PUD Amendment Ordinance. This Ordinance applies to the
subject real estate more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the
"Real Estate
1.1 This Ordinance hereby amends the Original PUD Ordinance by adding Multi
Family and Amenity Area as additional permitted uses in the Multi Family Area
and establishing development and architectural standards for those uses if the
Real Estate is developed to include those uses.
1.2 This Ordinance shall apply only to the Real Estate and to the permitted uses,
defined below.
1.3 The text of the Original PUD Ordinance shall remain in effect with the adoption
of this ordinance, and, if the Real Estate is developed to include the uses
permitted in the Original PUD Ordinance, then the Original PUD Ordinance
development and architectural standards shall apply to those uses.
1.4 All provisions and representations of the Original PUD Ordinance or Zoning
Ordinance that conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby rescinded
-1-
10.21.2009
as applied to the Real Estate and shall be superseded by the terms of this
Ordinance.
Section 2. Definitions. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Ordinance or in the
Original PUD Ordinance shall have the meanings ascribed to them in Chapter 3 of
the Zoning Ordinance in effect on the date of the enactment of this Ordinance.
2.1 Amended Conceptual Development Plan. A general plan for the development of
the Real Estate attached hereto as Exhibit B.
2.2 Amenity Area. An area and/or building containing facilities intended to serve the
residents of the Multi- Family Area including, without limitation, any one or a
combination of the following: (i) a swimming pool, (ii) a bath house with
changing rooms and storage, (iii) recreational equipment, (iv) tennis courts, (v)
basketball courts, (vi) bocce ball courts, (vii) indoor and/or outdoor workout
areas, (viii) laundry facilities, (ix) leasing office, (x) resident meeting spaces, (xi)
resident gathering spaces, and (xii) any other facilities approved by the Director
that compliment and are intended to serve the residents of the Multi- Family Area.
2.3 Multi Family Area. That part of the District more particularly delineated on the
Amended Conceptual Development Plan. The line delineating the Multi- Family
Area boundaries may be reasonably adjusted upon submittal of the Final
Development Plan.
Section 3. Permitted Uses and Development Requirements in the Multi- Family Area.
All new Multiple- Family and Amenity Area construction, alterations and
additions within the Multi- Family Area shall be in accordance with the following
guidelines.
3.1 Permitted Uses. The following uses shall be permitted in the Multi- Family Area:
A. Dwellings, Multiple Family
B. Apartments
C. Amenity Area
3.2 Maximum Building Height. The Building Height shall not exceed sixty (60) feet.
3.3 Minimum Floor Area. The minimum floor area per Dwelling Unit shall be six
hundred (600) square feet.
3.4 Setbacks.
A. Minimum Front Setback: 0 feet
B. Minimum Perimeter Yard: 0 feet
-2-
10.21.2009
C. Minimum Distance Between Buildings: 10 feet
3.5 Maximum Density. Without the approval of the Plan Commission, there shall be
no more than one hundred and ninety -six (196) Dwelling Units.
3.6 Architectural and Design Elements. The character illustrations, indicating
conceptually the intended architecture and appearance of the multi family
buildings, are attached hereto as Exhibit C.
3.7 Permitted Building Materials. Masonry (excluding stucco, synthetic stucco, and
EIFS), pre -cast concrete and cementitious board as primary material on first floor;
other sidings (excluding vinyl) are permitted on upper floors.
3.8 Required Window Openings. A minimum of two (2) windows per level, per
exposed facade, shall be required (a vent may be substituted for a window on a
gable). All windows shall be fully framed and trimmed. This section shall not
apply to the garage section of the building.
3.9 Wall Planes. Walls shall not have unbroken planes greater than sixty feet (60') in
length. Units may be differentiated by plane and material changes, and separate
entrances.
3.10 Porch/Entryways. Stoops should be covered to provide shelter. Individual
porches, balconies, stoops or similar outdoor spaces are encouraged on the front
and/or the rear of the building.
3.11 Roofline. Rooflines shall not have unbroken lines greater than sixty feet (60') in
length. Projecting hip and gable roof elements shall constitute a break in the
roofline.
3.12 Trash Areas. Screened trash areas shall be provided. Screening materials may
include brick, stone and other masonry materials. Doors may be constructed of
metal and/or wood. All doors shall have an automatic closure mechanism such as
spring loaded hinges.
3.13 Mechanical Equipment. Any mechanical equipment visible from an adjoining
public street shall be screened with suitable landscaping or fencing in general
architectural compatibility with the building(s) in which it is associated. Fencing
materials may include brick, stone and other attractive masonry screening
materials.
3.14 Parking Requirements.
A. One and one -half (1.5) spaces per Dwelling Unit shall be required. The
areas within driveways and garages shall count toward this requirement.
B. Covered parking shall match the primary building materials.
3
10.21.2009
C. Parking lots shall be landscaped in accordance with this Ordinance and
provide pedestrian access to and within the Multi- Family Area and the
Real Estate.
D. On- Street Parking.
(i) Should be encouraged and available for guest parking.
(ii) May be used to fulfill parking requirements.
(iii) Each space shall be a minimum of eighteen feet (18') in length.
E. Bicycle Parking. Bicycle parking shall be provided in compliance with
Section 27.06 of the Zoning Ordinance. Covered garage spaces may be
used to fulfill bicycle parking space requirements.
3.15 Lighting Requirements. Street lighting shall be provided near intersections of
streets and alleyways.
3.16 Pedestrian Connectivity. Sidewalks shall be provided throughout the Real Estate
to provide direct pedestrian connections within the Multi- Family Area
Section 4. Landscaping. Landscaping in the Multi- Family Area shall be designed to
complement the urban character of the District and the architecture of the
buildings. Street trees, streetscape plantings, and buffer areas shall be used to
bring natural elements to the design pattern, in consultation with the City's Urban
Forester.
4.1 General Landscaping Standards. Landscaping shall be integrated with other
functional and ornamental site design elements, where appropriate, such as
hardscape materials, paths, sidewalks, fencing, or any water features.
A. Plantings along buildings and streets should be designed with repetition,
structured patterns, and complementary textures and colors, and should
reinforce the overall character of the area. Alternate or pervious paving
material may be considered, or alternative planting media shall be
considered, where planting space is limited by restrictions such as
buildings, asphalt or concrete paving, parking lots, etc.
B. All trees, shrubs and ground covers shall be planted according to
American Standard for Nursery Stock (ANSI Z60.1), and following the
standards and best management practices (BMPs) published by the City's
Urban Forestry Section. Landscaping materials shall be appropriate to
local growing and climatic conditions. Plant suitability, maintenance and
compatibility with site construction features are critical factors that should
be considered.
-4-
10.21.2009
C. Shade trees shall be at least two and one half (2.5) inch caliper diameter
when planted. Ornamental trees shall be at least one and one half (1.5)
inch caliper diameter when planted. Evergreen trees shall be six (6) feet in
height when planted. Shrubs shall be at least eighteen (18) inches in height
when planted.
4.2 Perimeter Landscaping. Perimeter landscaping along the property lines shall be
provided in the form of either: (a) street trees for portions of the perimeter
abutting public right -of -way; or (b) landscaping per the requirements of the
Zoning Ordinance's Type "B" Bufferyard (3 shade trees, 3 ornamental trees, and
15 shrubs per 100 linear feet) for portions of the perimeter not abutting a public
right -of -way. The Real Estate's north property line shall be determined a side
yard for purposes of the perimeter landscaping requirement. No buffer yard or
landscaping internal to the District shall be required between or within the
different areas of the District.
4.3 Street Trees. Medium or large growing shade trees shall be planted within the
public street right -of -way, parallel to each street, in planting strips or tree wells.
Street trees shall be planted a minimum of thirty (30) feet and a maximum of fifty
(50) feet on center. In areas of high pedestrian and commercial activity, tree wells
shall be covered with decorative grates or pavers in order to maximize
uninterrupted pedestrian pathways. Where ample passage area is provided, tree
planting areas shall be treated as planting beds to soften the hardscape. Street
trees shall not be required along or adjacent to private drives or streets interior to
the Multi Family Area.
A. Per the City's standards, no street trees shall be planted in conflict with
drainage or utility easements or structures, underground detention (unless
so designed for that purpose), or within traffic vision safety clearances.
However, where the logical location of proposed utilities would
compromise the desired effect, the Developer may solicit the aid of the
City's Urban Forester in mediating cost effective solutions.
B. Street tree species shall be selected from the City's published list of
recommended street trees.
4.4 Building Landscaping Standards. Building base landscaping shall be provided at
the base of all building elevations which do not directly abut planted hardscapes,
to soften the architectural lines of buildings, frame the primary views to buildings
and public spaces, and blend architectural designs with the landscape. Building
landscaping shall be designed to appropriately complement the building's use,
setback, height, and architectural features. Window boxes for flowers and planters
on front stoops and sidewalks are encouraged in areas where landscaping cannot
be installed at the base of a building due to the building's proximity to a sidewalk,
path, street, right -of -way or easement. Building base landscaping may help fulfill
bufferyard requirements where applicable.
-5-
10.21.2009
A. The following building base plantings shall be required: Three (3) shade
trees, three (3) ornamental trees, and twenty -five (25) shrubs shall be
planted per one hundred (100) linear feet of building frontage on right -of-
way. If trees cannot be planted between the building and the sidewalk,
then an alternative location may be chosen for planting. Landscaping
interior courtyards are encouraged.
4.5 Parking Lot Plantings. Where parking lots are visible from the public right -of-
way, the following requirements shall apply:
A. Lot Interior. Minimum of one (1) shade tree per nine (9) parking spaces,
with a minimum of one hundred and eighty (180) square feet of useable
soil volume being provided for each tree; and
B. Lot Perimeter. A minimum five foot (5') wide perimeter planting strip
shall be provided on all sides of a parking lot (except where parking
spaces abut curb -to- building sidewalk) including four (4) shade trees and
twenty -five (25) shrubs and/or ornamental grasses per one hundred (100)
lineal feet of strip. Walls or fences with a minimum height of forty -two
inches (42 may be used in lieu of planting. Perimeter planting may
occupy the same space as a required bufferyard but lot perimeter plantings
shall be credited towards the perimeter bufferyard planting requirements.
4.6 Maintenance. It shall be the responsibility of the property owner(s) and their
agents to insure proper maintenance of project landscaping in accordance with
this Ordinance and best management practice standards. This is to include, but is
not limited to, mowing, tree trimming, planting, maintenance contracting,
irrigation and mulching of planting areas, replacing dead, diseased, or overgrown
plantings with identical varieties or a suitable substitute, and keeping the area free
of refuse, debris, rank vegetation and weeds.
Section 5. Signage. Signage within the Multi Family Area shall be per the Zoning
Ordinance. The multi- family development also shall be permitted to be identified
on the overall project ground signs, located as shown on the Original PUD
Ordinance's Conceptual Development Plan.
Section 6. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and
signing by the Mayor.
Z- PASSED by the Common Council of the City of Carmel, Indiana, this
day of 2009, by a vote of ayes and nays.
-6-
10.21.2009
COMMON COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF CARMEL
Presiding Officer Joseph C. Griffiths
W. Eric Seidensticker, President Pro Tempore Kevin D. Rider
John V. Accetturo Richard L. Sharp
Ronald E. Carter Luci Snyder
ATTEST
Diana L. Cordray, IAMC, Clerk Treasurer
Presented by me to the Mayor of the City of Carmel, Indiana this day of
2009, at .M.
Diana L. Cordray, IAMC, Clerk Treasurer
Approved by me, Mayor of the City of Carmel, Indiana this day of
2009, at .M.
James Brainard, Mayor
ATTEST
Diana L. Cordray, IAMC, Clerk Treasurer
This Instrument prepared by: Steven D. Hardin, Esq., Baker Daniels, LLP
600 East 96th Street, Suite 600, Indianapolis, Indiana 46240 I (317) 569 -9600
-7-
10.21.2009
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
116 Street Centre Planned Unit Development District
Part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 35 and the Southwest Quarter of Section 36, in
Township 18 North, Range 3 East, Hamilton County, Indiana, described as follows:
Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Southeast Quarter Section; thence South 88
degrees 49 minutes 34 seconds West (assumed bearing) along the South line of said
Southeast Quarter Section a distance of 23.00 feet; thence North 01 degrees 10 minutes
26 seconds West a distance of 100.00 feet to the intersection of the North line of 116
Street (per "Limited Warranty Deed" to the City of Carmel recorded as Instrument
number 200400022719 in the Hamilton County Recorder's office) with the East right of
way line of College Avenue (per "Dedication of Street Right -Of -Way" recorded as
Instrument number 8742050), being the Point of Beginning, (the following five courses
are along the East lines of said College Avenue per said "Dedication said point being
on a non tangent curve concave Easterly having a central angle of 20 degrees 02
minutes 28 seconds and a radius of 707.00 feet; 1) thence Northerly along the arc of
said curve a distance of 247.30 feet (said arc being subtended by a chord having a
bearing of North 08 degrees 50 minutes 15 seconds East and a length of 246.04 feet; 2)
thence North 18 degrees 17 minutes 09 seconds East a distance of 100.00 feet; 3) thence
North 18 degrees 51 minutes 31 seconds East a distance of 71.39 feet to a tangent curve
concave Westerly having a central angle of 48 degrees 21 minutes 28 seconds and a
radius of 162.00 feet; 4) thence Northerly along the arc of said curve a distance of
136.73 feet (said arc being subtended by a chord having a bearing of North 05 degrees
19 minutes 13 seconds West and a length of 132.71 feet); 5) thence on a tangent line
North 29 degrees 29 minutes 57 seconds West a distance of 111.19 feet; thence North
89 degrees 09 minutes 48 seconds East parallel with the South line of said Southwest
Quarter Section a distance of 596.48 feet; thence North 00 degrees 22 minutes 52
seconds West a distance of 58.02 feet; thence North 89 degrees 09 minutes 48 seconds
East a distance of 220.00 feet; thence South 00 degrees 22 minutes 52 seconds East a
distance of 725.72 feet to the North line of 116 Street (per "Limited Warranty Deed" to
the City of Carmel recorded as Instrument number 200300127285 in the Hamilton
County Recorder's office); (the remaining 4 courses being along the North lines of said
116 Street as conveyed to the City of Carmel recorded as said Instrument number
200300127285, Limited Warranty Deed recorded as Instrument number 200300127280,
Personal Representatives Deed recorded as Instrument number 200300088446 and said
Instrument number 200400022719); 1) thence South 89 degrees 09 minutes 48 seconds
West a distance of 494.22 feet; 2) thence North 82 degrees 18 minutes 41 seconds West
a distance of 66.35 feet; 3) thence North 89 degrees 13 minutes 54 seconds West a
distance of 261.39 feet; 4) thence North 57 degrees 22 minutes 41 seconds West along
said North line a distance of 29.80 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 12.417
acres, more or less.
-8-
10.21.2009
EXHIBIT B
AMENDED CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
-9-
10.21.2009
EXHIBIT C
MULTI FAMILY BUILDING CHARACTER ILLUSTRATIONS
10
Conn, Angelina V
From: Hunter, Shirley A [Shirley.Hunter@duke- energy.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 8:28 AM
To: Conn, Angelina V
Subject: TAC
Angie,
I will not be able to attend TAC this morning. The only item on the agenda to affect me is #09090017 OA and there are
no issues from Duke Energy with this request. The other items are IP &L customers.
Thanks,
Shirley Hunter
Sr. Distribution Engineering Specialist
Duke Energy
16475 Southpark Drive
Westfield, IN 46074
317 896 -6711
1
Conn, Angelina V
From: Clark, Joanie L. [jlclark @Vectren.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 7:31 AM
To: Conn, Angelina V
Subject: TAC Meeting
Good Morning Angie,
Since there are only 3 items on TAC agenda this month and we do not have a concern with any of them I am not going to
attend the meeting today.
Thank you for keeping us in the loop. Have a great day!
Joanie Clark
Vectren Energy Delivery, Noblesville
317- 776 -5532
DISCLAIMER:
+The information transmitted is intended only for designated recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and /or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of,
or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and do
not retain but destroy any copies of this document.
1
i llll ll//o F /a �p o
\11, 0y City of awe
+0
llllrl l�
October 14, 2009
Mr. Jesse Pohlman
Baker and Daniels
600 E 96 St. ste 600
Indianapolis, IN 46240
RE: 116 St College PUD
Dear Mr. Pohlman:
The following letter represents comments for this project specifically addressing the area of alternative transportation. I have
reviewed the drawings submitted for the April 16, 2008 Technical Advisory Committee meeting and offer the following
comments:
ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW COMMENTS
1) Please include sidewalks within the multi family area to provide direct pedestrian connections within this section of
the development
2) Please refer to the City of Carmel's Parking Ordinance in order to determine appropriate number, locations,
specifications and construction details for bicycle parking.
3) Please consider including long term covered bicycle parking with this development.
We request that all responses to our comments be provided in writing. Failure to provide written responses may result in delay
of the review process.
It is critical that this office be made aware of all modification made on the plans being re- submitted, particularly if any such
changes are considered "new" or fall outside of our previous reviews. Please provide revised plans indicating all revisions.
Please notify us of any changes and specifically state any changes, including changes resulting from Plan Commission, Special
Studies or other committee meetings.
The Department of Community Services reserves the right to provide additional comments based on subsequent reviews.
If you have questions, please contact me at 571 -2417.
Sincerely,
David Litt ejo
Alternative Transportation Coordinator
Department of Community Services
cc: Angie Conn, Department of Community Services
Engineering Department Review
Page 1
ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571 -2417
Conn, Angelina V
From: Pohlman, Jesse M. [Jesse.Pohlman @bakerd.com]
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 9:48 AM
To: Conn, Angelina V; Brewer, Scott I
Subject: 116th Street Centre PUD Amendment Ordinance
Attachments: Ordinance_Draft 2009- 09- 18_Filed.pdf
Good morning Angie and Scott
I e- mailed the relevant documents to the TAC members for J.C. Hart's 116 Street Centre PUD amendment and offered
to forward to the TAC members the proposed ordinance if they were interested, so if I receive any requests from them I
will do so, but I wanted to go ahead and forward the proposed ordinance to you two specifically so you had it, even
though we submitted hardcopies with our application Friday. The ordinance format is intended to simply add on to the
existing 116 Street Centre PUD and we attempted to keep the same format and outline of the original ordinance as
well.
If you have any questions or comments after you have an opportunity to review the amendment ordinance, then please
do not hesitate to contact us. Thank you.
Jesse
JESSE M. POHLMAN
LAND USE CONSULTANT
T: 317.569.4836 1 F: 317.237.8476 I MAIN: 317.569.9600
BAKER DANIELS LLP 1 WWW.BAKERDANIELS.COM
CARMEL OFFICE (mailing address) 1 600 E. 96 STREET, SUITE 600 I INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46240
NOBLESVILLE OFFICE 1 23 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET 1 NOBLESVILLE, IN 46060
ATTENTION:
To ensure compliance with applicable Internal Revenue Service Regulations,
we inform you that any tax advice contained in this electronic message was
not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of
avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code.
This message and all its attachments are PRIVATE and may contain
information that is CONFIDENTIAL and PRIVILEGED.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender by reply
e -mail and delete the message immediately.
1
Conn, Angelina V
From: Pohlman, Jesse M. [Jesse.Pohlman@bakerd.com]
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 1:43 PM
To: Conn, Angelina V
Subject: FW: TAC Agenda Item 1 116th Street Centre Planned Unit Development District Amendment
FYI.
From: Yackle, Troy [mailto:Troy.Yackle @SUG.com]
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 1:35 PM
To: Pohlman, Jesse M.
Subject: RE: TAC Agenda Item 1 116th Street Centre Planned Unit Development District Amendment
Panhandle Eastern Pipeline has no company facilities involved in this project.
Troy A. Yackle
Right -of -Way Representative
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line /Trunkline Gas Company
937 Zionsville Road
Indianapolis, IN 46268
Office: (3 733 3 21 3 Fax: (3 733
Cell: (5 37
troy.yackle @sug.com
From: Pohlman, Jesse M. [mailto:Jesse.Pohlman @bakerd.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2009 2:34 PM
To: aconn @carmel.in.gov; gduncan @carmel.in.gov; cholmes @carmel.in.gov; nredden @carmel.in.gov;
Wakers @carmel.in.gov; whohlt @carmel.in.gov; Sbrewer @carmel.in.gov; JDuffy @carmel.in.gov; Mfogarty @carmel.in.gov;
dlittlejohn @carmel.in.gov; cellison @carmel.in.gov; Tkrueskamp @carmel.in.gov; david.lucas @hamiltoncounty.in.gov;
mwestermeier @carmel.in.gov; Jason.Lemaster @hamiltoncounty.in.gov; Greg .Noyes @hamiltoncounty.in.gov;
Brooke .Gajownik @hamiltoncounty.in.gov; jason.kirkman @mybrighthouse.com; shirley.hunter @duke energy.com;
jennifer.marlett@veoliawaterna.com; Rfarrand @ccs.k12.in.us; ryan.hartman @ctrwd.org; Yackle, Troy;
dan.davenport@aes.com; gilko @crossroadengineers.com; dhuffman @carmel.in.gov; cshupperd @vectren.com;
doland.w.wise @usps.gov; jthomas @carmel.in.gov; Gary.McNamee @duke- energy.com
Cc: Todd May; John Hart
Subject: TAC Agenda Item 1 116th Street Centre Planned Unit Development District Amendment
Dear TAC Members:
On behalf of J.C. Hart Company, Inc., we filed an application to amend the text of the 116th Street Centre Planned Unit
Development District located on the northeast corner of 116th Street and College Avenue (see attached aerial location
exhibit). The PUD currently permits townhome and neighborhood serving uses (e.g., office and retail). The requested
amendment is to allow multi family uses on the northern 6.75 acres of the site and establish development and
architectural standards for the proposed use.
Enclosed for your review in advance of the October 21' TAC meeting, please find the proposed conceptual development
plan and character elevations for the multi family use. I have also attached for your convenience a copy of the existing
PUD's conceptual development plan for reference. If you would like a copy of the proposed ordinance e- mailed to you
as well, please let me know and I will be happy to do so.
If you would like hardcopies of these materials mailed to you or if you have any questions or comments in advance of
the TAC meeting, then please do not hesitate to contact me. Otherwise, thank you for your time and we look forward to
your comments.
1
Jesse
JESSE M. POHLMAN
LAND USE CONSULTANT
T: 317.569.4836 1 F: 317.237.8476 I MAIN: 317.569.9600
BAKER DANIELS LLP S WWW.BAKERDANIELS.COM
CARMEL OFFICE (mailing address) 1 600 E. 96 STREET, SUITE 600 1 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46240
NOBLESVILLE OFFICE 1 23 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET 1 NOBLESVILLE, IN 46060
ATTENTION:
To ensure compliance with applicable Internal Revenue Service Regulations,
we inform you that any tax advice contained in this electronic message was
not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of
avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code.
This message and all its attachments are PRIVATE and may contain
information that is CONFIDENTIAL and PRIVILEGED.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender by reply
e -mail and delete the message immediately.
Private and confidential as detailed here. If you cannot access hyperlink, please e -mail sender.
ATTENTION:
To ensure compliance with applicable Internal Revenue Service Regulations,
we inform you that any tax advice contained in this electronic message was
not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of
avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code.
This message and all its attachments are PRIVATE and may contain
information that is CONFIDENTIAL and PRIVILEGED.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender by reply
e -mail and delete the message immediately.
2
Conn, Angelina V
From: Pohlman, Jesse M. [Jesse.Pohlman @bakerd.com]
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 1:43 PM
To: Conn, Angelina V
Subject: FW: TAC Agenda Item 1116th Street Centre Planned Unit Development District Amendment
FYI.
From: Greg Ilko [mailto:gilko @crossroadengineers.com]
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 1:13 PM
To: Pohlman, Jesse M.
Cc: 'Duncan, Gary R'; 'Greg R. Hoyes'
Subject: RE: TAC Agenda Item 1 116th Street Centre Planned Unit Development District Amendment
Jesse,
There is nothing for us to review at this time. Once final construction plans and drainage calculations are prepared,
please forward one set of each to my attention for review.
Sincerely,
Gregory J. Ilko
CrossRoad Engineers, PC
3417 Sherman Drive
Beech Grove, IN 46107
Office: 317.780.1555 ext. 112
Fax: 317.780.6525
www.crossroadenqineers.com
From: Pohlman, Jesse M. mailto :Jesse.Pohlman @bakerd.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2009 2:34 PM
To: aconn @carmel.in.gov; gduncan @carmel.in.gov; cholmes @carmel.in.gov; nredden @carmel.in.gov;
Wakers @carmel.in.gov; whohlt @carmel.in.gov; Sbrewer @carmel.in.gov; JDuffy @carmel.in.gov; Mfogarty@carmel.in.gov;
dlittlejohn @carmel.in.gov; cellison @carmel.in.gov; Tkrueskamp @carmel.in.gov; david .lucas @hamiltoncounty.in.gov;
mwestermeier @carmel.in.gov; J ason .Lemaster @hamiltoncounty.in.gov; Greg,Hoyes @hamiltoncounty.in.gov;
Brooke.Gajownik @hamiltoncounty.in.gov; jason.kirkman @mybrighthouse.com; shirley.hunter @duke energy.com;
jennifer.marlett @veoliawaterna.com; Rfarrand @ccs.k12.in.us; ryan.hartman @ctrwd.org; troy.yackle @sug.com;
dan.davenport@aes.com; gilko @crossroadengineers.com; dhuffman @carmel.in.gov; cshupperd @vectren.com;
doland.w.wise @usps.gov; jthomas @carmel.in.gov; Gary.McNamee @duke energy.com
Cc: Todd May; John Hart
Subject: TAC Agenda Item 1 116th Street Centre Planned Unit Development District Amendment
Dear TAC Members:
On behalf of J.C. Hart Company, Inc., we filed an application to amend the text of the 116th Street Centre Planned Unit
Development District located on the northeast corner of 116th Street and College Avenue (see attached aerial location
exhibit). The PUD currently permits townhome and neighborhood serving uses (e.g., office and retail). The requested
amendment is to allow multi family uses on the northern 6.75 acres of the site and establish development and
architectural standards for the proposed use.
Enclosed for your review in advance of the October 21 TAC meeting, please find the proposed conceptual development
plan and character elevations for the multi family use. I have also attached for your convenience a copy of the existing
PUD's conceptual development plan for reference. If you would like a copy of the proposed ordinance e- mailed to you
as well, please let me know and I will be happy to do so.
1
If you would like hardcopies of these materials mailed to you or if you have any questions or comments in advance of
the TAC meeting, then please do not hesitate to contact me. Otherwise, thank you for your time and we look forward to
your comments.
Jesse
JESSE M. POHLMAN
LAND USE CONSULTANT
T:317.569.4836 I F: 317.237.8476 I MAIN: 317.569.9600
BAKER DANIELS LLP 1 WWW.BAKERDANIELS.COM
CARMEL OFFICE (mailing address) 1 600 E. 96 STREET, SUITE 600 I INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46240
NOBLESVILLE OFFICE I 23 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET 1 NOBLESVILLE, IN 46060
ATTENTION:
To ensure compliance with applicable Internal Revenue Service Regulations,
we inform you that any tax advice contained in this electronic message was
not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of
avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code.
This message and all its attachments are PRIVATE and may contain
information that is CONFIDENTIAL and PRIVILEGED.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender by reply
e -mail and delete the message immediately.
ATTENTION:
To ensure compliance with applicable Internal Revenue Service Regulations,
we inform you that any tax advice contained in this electronic message was
not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of
avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code.
This message and all its attachments are PRIVATE and may contain
information that is CONFIDENTIAL and PRIVILEGED.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender by reply
e -mail and delete the message immediately.
2
Conn, Angelina V
From: Pohlman, Jesse M. [Jesse.Pohlman @bakerd.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2009 2:34 PM
To: Conn, Angelina V; Duncan, Gary R; Holmes, Christine B; Redden, Nick; Akers, William P;
Hohlt, William G; Brewer, Scott 1; Duffy, John M; Fogarty, Michael D; Littlejohn, David W;
Ellison, Christopher M; Krueskamp, Theresa A; david.lucas@hamiltoncounty.in.gov;
Westermeier, Mark; Jason. Lemaster @hamiltoncounty.in.gov;
Greg .Hoyes @hamiltoncounty.in.gov; Brooke. Gajownik @hamiltoncounty.in.gov;
jason.kirkman@mybrighthouse.com; shirley.hunter @duke energy.com;
jennifer.marlett @veoliawaterna.com; Rfarrand @ccs.kl2.in.us; ryan.hartman @ctrwd.org;
troy.yackle @sug.com; dan.davenport@aes.com; gilko @crossroadengineers.com; Huffman,
David; cshupperd @vectren.com; doland.w.wise @usps.gov; Thomas, John G;
Gary.McNamee@duke-energy.com
Cc: Todd May; John Hart
Subject: TAC Agenda Item 1116th Street Centre Planned Unit Development District Amendment
Attachments: 116th Centre PUD Amendment Exhibits.pdf
Dear TAC Members:
On behalf of J.C. Hart Company, Inc., we filed an application to amend the text of the 116th Street Centre Planned Unit
Development District located on the northeast corner of 116th Street and College Avenue (see attached aerial location
exhibit). The PUD currently permits townhome and neighborhood serving uses (e.g., office and retail). The requested
amendment is to allow multi family uses on the northern 6.75 acres +1- of the site and establish development and
architectural standards for the proposed use.
Enclosed for your review in advance of the October 21 TAC meeting, please find the proposed conceptual development
plan and character elevations for the multi family use. I have also attached for your convenience a copy of the existing
PUD's conceptual development plan for reference. If you would like a copy of the proposed ordinance e- mailed to you
as well, please let me know and I will be happy to do so.
If you would like hardcopies of these materials mailed to you or if you have any questions or comments in advance of
the TAC meeting, then please do not hesitate to contact me. Otherwise, thank you for your time and we look forward to
your comments.
Jesse
JESSE M. POHLMAN
LAND USE CONSULTANT
T: 317.569.4836 1 F: 317.237.8476 1 MAIN: 317.569.9600
BAKER DANIELS LLP WWW.BAKERDANIELS.COM
CARMEL OFFICE (mailing address) 1 600 E. 96 STREET, SUITE 600 1 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46240
NOBLESVILLE OFFICE 1 23 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET 1 NOBLESVILLE, IN 46060
ATTENTION:
To ensure compliance with applicable Internal Revenue Service Regulations,
we inform you that any tax advice contained in this electronic message was
not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of
avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code.
1
This message and all its attachments are PRIVATE and may contain
information that is CONFIDENTIAL and PRIVILEGED.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender by reply
e -mail and delete the message immediately.
2
z.,,-----,____.----„
it
W-ki ;,==.-----tz--------, s
=-1-' -l it-" 3 W v'7 -----=-•Ta-, --__-----E --2 ‘.0 i E•°=1 13,-r
*--,---,==.----..,•:,==--,,,,,,z. .-----z7- .,.i,,. '.r.., I c ,..i I I I
tt,
7. 7 77.''''-
7 ,_----,..2-z,..,47-„;=-.
IF _17 5 ,:=14----z ='.2.--.:.,, ---'-`-',-4 -_-_--------,--A-,----t'.-_. •-7,1,,-------,-,--- jz
-,-77-----g_f. _.„.„,.---1-=-----s. _-i•, .-:.-7_ ___,....=_„_,,_.,1
.,...----,--....----,.,--„,f,„7-.,.„,______...,--..„,
,,.....,-......--s_..--- --.4...--------„7:3_71----,--_,„-_,.....,---7-----,,,---,_:,--,
-.•=---7,---...-------,------.---------,
1 --------1-- 9-'1.-e-4-4--..-...... --".-0..
..r. e ..#7,-=.-- ,,..,7-___ k* •••■•04:10...• 4 t
11
-W_Zt ,4_-_ K. 1. ,Y. L 7 v--- 4 411 4 4W44, 6,4: s 040 4; --.13, , ..:-.,-.=.=_,.....-.,.----4....._ -Z,r,- t= 3 ,i'
ti
7...
-n r,_' s 4 1 t 7 ._._N 4,174:14 ,..0,44 5,.--zr,..._
li 1... 2
-A, ,-i ts --t_t '.1' 0-4,...,...,,,, ,,,..e.-fp.--,,,,i__4:t-‘-1
------...-.A.-w y= ,__.•.-,-,t.;..">="--..7----e-----=.0-,=-7-
-Vie -÷,._-7-_-- S .--7,x 7 -Tiw -a -2,---,::-„,„,_-_,_-_,„__T__,-....-_______-r_
rirE 5 .--*.t..:_.:_,,,..,,---:---__-..:_riz_-_,---_,_---7--...:
-'-':-..*..-1-.:1-1*-4:7,1C-'"el-' 1 i 4 i •f=j-Z-- ':4- t
E-
-__--,-,-,.-:-_,c,n•-4- ,f, ..,e s„,.-- _A L..-
C..)
Ade. .-W-,,,-- ,i, '-1--• f. '4-. '14.4
*to
if
E-1
c4
1-1
Al
4- 4 ..--'._-,,-------==-zz-.-i-----:-4.--x-T,------,-____---_--.:w_.,.,,,.,,
E*_ 4, Evi-
E-1 -•t
...L.--
4 1.4
-,-1-4---„ _,--73kir-2------ gg
a)
e4--_4=---- ----4t=---4't-:,--------.T==
,t,
00 4
t a...)
W o r‘
I b.0
0 -•C
:L,--,-.3, ----=_A-
W r 4 44 ff 7 0
it I .•.-_'-y-:- T,,--.,
_.v.,_______ --i 1-; I (1.)
=-1 4 41 --1--,',-- ,A. 7,-----77..--•._.A,-aa-V---:-.•-L-,-4-- -";,€`--,.;_._-_5--7-Ar: ..z
E-1 7:
4- 1- --,..4
9._.:_-,--,--,-_.14,,,,*„--7-z_toz.„-_„,---,,a-.—-
cal 1.01
tii 2 .;.,:-1,zisz 4, '2: t-il----,--ez-F-_-_,-_-w-------.#_-,±-t-n-1,-_•,-rtil-_--
r__,
••_Th ,i- --1-.t--t r.
`---------1--:•=-T4---, :72-,-,-,---.,--7--_,..---,, t -,,---.-----m.--z._---.-.--_-=-- -w-- I F.'lv--IC:.)
I 0
1-i
r ,r.:-. zt -,---------_,Tiw-.------_,--f.---,-.,--,--,,,„,____-___-7.._,
,,_,-A,„„--z:ft l :-_---,--i-----,-------;__-::_y------,,-z,-FT„--.-----,
W.4 1.1'.,
's -&-71--7*..„-l& ,,t r 14;::==- 7-:_--,77-4----7:.----
tr C■
4
,-1
4 al.
i.• -1. .4-)
po 4
1 -.--,...----,Ar--- ..w __A .7A-Ers::- ..-.7 --7 I 1
I
I 1•1
C 3
r-.-T- L=...
:----"--",------=-------_-_--N ----:,-------_--'-'-'-''-'7:
5.-7-,----- ____--4:_-,-.= ----7r: .-Mr_t---_,....,_,-,_.-----_-,.,----,,,......41: I, Z-
-1
i
E-1
„--f:,--A--------, ,i,---,,,,
,,-------07,------_---,---- -E*,„x: -,---7,-41----,- ----------,r*,..--;-=-,...,.2.1--.,-_,_-__..„---F-__-___-5‘.--,„-_,,_,.-7-,„_,,.=_-_,
E pr.4
W
it
7r
k 's.- s•-••
.._.z.
C4
L_E
r
0
i ----E,----*
4 C
/-0
=4 r
/-I
7-.
i w-'.a.----=•-_-_'-.7=----- -,..,-...,-...,.±..z.-,.....,=-1_
■■•1 1-- C
-'7-------;=-'-'s;-----g•• i•L'-''-' V '''.;.--z.; -.,,',----•;_ie-r-f=-,7z-
pi I 10 E
0 -.-eal -Ate V. ":---r----=.4_-74 Vale .4'.1/1W-;-Tt. S IL 7 wit:•- _,W, E.
U
4104:' i'S- CL) 1 c
1 ,00.....4%
t o
4 1 CO 1 2
m-s-&-T__-,*--- .7:---------10-----_,-40044,•'4417x'--T.,. 4 1,-- 3-■„„(e 4, w--_-:=„4---„--,7, w
I E a5
_±..A ,..4.,,440.„7,..13.-.st!--,J.
U ,L
-7-,-.1._ %-'-=-"'-_,,-"Ly.-A7,,r -'---.47449■Itir .-T-4,:l'_:•=4:-'74,'=-----44:1t &----;,--=-*X -5-7,,,k-r---4-------*"
g--.-----,,-,-_,-___, w-_tl-=_----L-_,-,--a-za•rP''---,-------;ij------ --------,--„."&a4k„.----,,z-i-.-r---k-z-=-=-;];-e-zL ,e- r, t
F
-1■A i
-__*".3. •.=:=----_--_---=-:,-4--4-:-_--.-:„-_;s:_.---- f__,, "7-----,_„„,.0
rt:1 1
v-
F-I E 0 CD
•ini t
--_---_T..--
1=1 Et
.7-_-
A
E
If
7-4 'Ir...,:'44-:-=-2-17------ ,,,,,,,,,,,ThqtaiWi
,4 t' s, 4 1 ij .++;::,re.'f''''''''*'-''''' r immili ft
r7 sl ft
,.c
71.10.1, /in 1 f---1 IL
MI Rail [1 EM El i---
I,
1=1.1 k.
i _=---,i i- ,Irmo=
7-7- c E111111i ‘1 llwriwitimilli
ry
1 i
IL
U
.-.---1- 1 _-_-1-, 1,......
,.4 A.: i '1• T 04 r pl
.x If. _ie m4f:' 1 :---,L
.N
tt
'41 11- sys=s
It MI ift 063 1E:
s L r .44: p f• I +L f-'
1 i 10 P ieirt:'''., lisseim IIII-ili. ';Ei L
ff 'i' quit 'flit lEff 1 fi
l•-. ,-;0•=. ;0• 0
1%,' 1 1 t-
t-4-4. mi 1 -1", 11 i
k 'i 4, r -r-i 1 nE' ij, act" 1 N- l+r---4
:_a_ 11,, atom iiii4,, _m_.., :.1 .7i'l-F!
I
l,„„ o ,--3-Iti i :-.4tr, _,11 vitiliii1A
L mom 1
4 uI iL ....11 -.........._P
E I 1
Eaul 1 i
1 11
I IMIMM i
31 GEMI 11M I
11
u
0-___
v 1
--,:g-• In Mll
N
E-i 4
tw gititir r_rt„,:,r- I f,
c.)
up
=i, a 1 1
a ii
A
low 4tt..
t l' -i M IL' Mamm
a
i,' 1
ii CO
--4. Raf.-----114.110raf,31q141:1)4q11011:41.:
W E*
'1- &tf-W iijkiHifl.
I M ,4 it
1.-4.= r 1 ..1 k
CI.
1 gi-OW
nail
C
z----, al-A i.
04
Or 'AIM r O• oli usu.! mi
-....,."1,-;.ki, grill] i_ 0 4.101'
1..4
'a
W4
q tip
ME-
ft-
w w
',:_i cl)
'I
V
E-4
II I;
1, 4 v
Pi 0
1 5 i t lasialli
C.)
i r--
EIM,9
CI
.1
w U
g 7 1. 1 r Emelt_
-.4,:t4 d
4 (.7
1
4 4
.inunt.11415raft-_,-
mlw.
I \C
-._:.-,.:17.-TA:=1 M rail ttlit We_M qA..1
Pil _..:.c.,,
110 I '''"'"LIArTki=rol:04
nil, -..p =411. fril 61r1fIlk.,
4 .4
W "N
It
c.T4
AlIF l ft
HE 1 rf i.1111,1 ts: 0 i,.
1 I 1 1 illgit;i. .,■i i
4■I
IIS 4
t t it it
1.---:-.- 41aVF 1 Alp
MS
isom m1132211111 n
1 orzttME3 1■1 i
w II
E-1
.,,,,m.A _____..1
■z
In llommoll
g 11 0) (I)
,ra
,ra
--_.,_—_..1.-_)---€1-2-1-77-.17! 1 i t,7-
r i f-rfazmlirAftio.il 41;0_ ;10;: =s
a cu
1
,----7, .',111
R I 0
r:IV=-4-4. TA 7 .,,,T1Y1-1 21'",t V:ie cl.) 1 c
.7: -7 -7 g
A
O4
r47*),, a U -V1 1 1',,, L 7,-, fi 'V h
:715:4; 111111111111111 I 'F- -Dge to cf41 1
tz t co tr)
---7-'4r1•-: 1 1 11 1 1 -r -ra i'F111:1 1 alitt,i1
14 ,,li f i..:„,,_,,4 1
3 mm o '7
i A 17 0 4
----N itKi 1104, fraalr.; 4fin MIWI
1 11M11114-& -1-4 i LT""-- 3.
CO 3
.....a Li
2.1 i ,...„.m...
9...±* m 1 fl i i P.m 1.__I 1
J _6:111 6- 1 1 m Ei 1
i
a1CiA �:al ti
3 ;t
E 1. �v
I
.t 1
MOO q t l 7 a r I
if
i
I4 p
j 231 I 1 f
i ii o c 4 '7:'
1►
,u4, 51 r a,
!A::: V altqliall Pet,gL,4 ..'Fm 10-1.-e, URLII :lii
t U
I
H z f
s
Z aillllll 6'
A H I 1 11 i 1 f k r, �i 1 1,4 v��vI�� }t 1 41.x,;+ t 4 -2 k'$` "r�
FT
cA
oo
Z
ALEE W I
W rY X111111111111 ati t T rt I fiY zi! ss L
A t• i �-xa i ..k .:P+4 f 4 -Fy! 5
V lI' f ago
V
1 011
a a g:1 rt
FBI M ina° i r 5 j}` g 3
1+ 111 y
Z a_ ��i MOV IE ffi s V./
I Ti
W MEM 1, 1
I I I
x
c4 E
1111111111 1" r
el: It
}I£ 11111111111111
1M m
CU I
w
Z IF
c
;1111111111111 o
i
s �g� I ke, 2-41 N c
111 f 0. 1* to m j 1 4 F r v 2 _111111111 i
M
1 t om c,-_-,,,,,
I 1
d
I
i- e
f! j
k'
_4 f
ti
t n
k
fi r_
U
ICI F L p
El
I
tt
El
Li
P4 44
U S r !.iti to W /1
t--,-.. 5
fib 04?
PP -•'w _.--7—=---- -E E fiEri 4' 1 I 1 4 if
E� ii= 1
#T 1 j 7
"".E 1 L---...11 W
a
r.
0 i CS) I v)
1 D c
E C Q E Fri ID
a
co
4. a E-1 Q)
r a (6
N
3 L 0
1 C o
1
if
it
•rn -.n ku) .m-n, kst
S WNfign
4e... P......10.2 Mt �not■�ieoi Y w13a p p C
sar a =xoiun �d f1N3/ib 3031 V 133 21 1 5, H l 9l l 9 a
z
3 .an4N!
Nbtld 3 IS c a V
illi'iti.111111111Pililiti Pi Iit!11 S Y I 'Q r 1 p .0 1g l a 1 11! 1 111! 1. ts1 l S /Ii 1i1 1� il ir 21 ag fi 111.1 L i t i t q r i 1 o b ib
j s 1 r 3- s 1` a n 1 1 ccees r li t 111111111 1 g t 1
I 1 i ii i 111 ,1 111 a p x l Q a g. g l a e a A >ttei
lili s t t !ii t!1' 1 1 l 11 1111 I i.. g A
E-1 11 ;1 gggg Y Y .ra s a° .a. a' a: p'! rV, g
a d ig 11
CI ;1 113
E*
A
z
E'''l d''
w a
o cl w s 74.. 61 _a°,7,----inr-Zsi-17-17 11 1 7 7Y -77: 7,- 7 1 7; i r 1 4 '2
z W o I f i ■i1 111111111C111:111 ®ig1ci11RICkI® Y t�. 9
t im, :Mil r'ffriciTili a
W a Q 1 !!!1 I 1
I!'w 4 e y
W
a z ;i i iAk��i— 1�
o 11 1111E1 iiili�i ®1 i ���i1>�iii:ilu� 1 z C7 r H
l jo
U i 1 PF .Iralitiliil
w i :wiiE1 CN Milli 2 1 E les
tx -Atli ERN i z du c, i
x
P k r
1"I k r r i -r te Y� i IR 4 1.
1 wi_ Y 0 1
I I 1
A to, r 1
I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I t- 1 E f
1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1
smiqummusimi i
r i
1
k
I
8
A