HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication Page 1 of 2
Boone, Rachel M.
From: Boone, Rachel M.
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 2:00 PM
To: Blanchard, Jim E; Brewer, Scott I; Conn, Angelina V; Donahue -Wold, Alexia K; Hancock, Ramona
B; Hollibaugh, Mike P; Holmes, Christine B; Keeling, Adrienne M; Littlejohn, David W; Martin,
Candy; Mindham, Daren; Stewart, Lisa; Tingley, Connie S
Cc: 'Amanda Gates'
Subject: Docket No. Assignment: (ADLS Amend) Jiffy Lube Signage #10040018 ADLS Amend)
I have issued the necessary Docket Number for (ADLS Amend) Jiffy Lube Signage. It is the following:
ADLS Amend Application Fee: $298.00
Per sign Fee ($59.50) x 3: $178.50
Total Fee: $476.50
Docket No. 10040018 ADLS Amend: Jiffy Lube Signage
The applicant seeks approval for three new wall signs.
The site is located at 1495 Keystone Way E. Dr. and is zoned B -8 within the Keystone Overlay district.
Filed by Amanda Gates of Sign Craft Industries.
Petitioner, please note the following:
1. This Item will not be on an agenda of the Technical Advisory Committee.
2. Mailed and Published Public Notice does not need to occur.
3. Proof of Notice is not needed.
4. The Filing Fee and Eight (8) Information packets must be delivered to Plan Commission Secretary,
Ramona Hancock, no later than 12:00 PM, Friday, May 27, 2010. If filing fee and materials are not
delivered by this time, this application will be continued to the July 6, 2010 meeting.
5. This Item will appear on the June 1, 2010 agenda of the Plan Commission Special Studies Committee at
6:00 pm in the Caucus Room, Second Floor, City Hall. Please have a representative attend.
Review Comments:
1. Elevation A:
1. Please specify if the white filler panel will be backlit. We would prefer there is no illumination
behind the panel.
2. Please specify if the new entire gray and maroon panel will be backlit or if only the letters will
push through illumination.
3. Also will there be a red LED lighting strip between the two colors? If so, please remove this
lighting feature.
2. Elevation B:
1. Again, please specify if white filler panels will be illuminated. If so, please remove
illumination.
2. We would prefer to see the 4' filler panel like on Elevation A instead of the 2' panel. We
believe this would give the roof /cap element a more cohesive look. Please let us know if this
can be done and if not, the reasons.
3. Elevation C:
1. How is this main wall sign to be illuminated? It does not match the panel from Elevation B
which makes me question its functionality.
2. Again, we would prefer to see the 4' filler panel rather than the 2' panel especially if a 4' tall
wall sign is proposed on this elevation.
3. The alternate photo on the right does not match the alternate photo from Elevation D. Which
is really proposed?
4/30/2010
Page 2 of 2
4. Elevation D:
1. Again, the alternate photo shows a maroon and red filler panel on Elevation C. Is it really
white filler like on the Elevation C page?
2. Also we would prefer the 4' filler panel.
Ms. Gates can be reached at 317 842 -8664.
Thanks,
1Zcr the 1, Boone/
Sign Reviewer
City of Carmel
Department of Community Services
3rd Floor
One Civic Square
Carmel, IN 46032
317.571.2417
317.571.2426 fax
http: /www.ci_carmel.in.us /services /communityservice.html
Please consider the environment before printing this e -mail
4/30/2010