HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence Page 1 of 1
Boone, Rachel M.
From: Boone, Rachel M.
c o t r
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 4:12 PM
To: 'Brian Cross' 1A
l n
Subject: 808 W. Main comments Uv"
0\ U`rt
Hi Brian,
I had a couple comments /questions about the proposed signage plan. In #6, are you proposing the signs be both
face lit and back lit? If they could be one or the other, that would be good. Or could you explain the reasoning
behind needing both?
Looking to the Tanning sign example included in the packet, it contradicts itself on lighting style and face color.
On the top it says "Fabricate and install internally illuminated facelit channel letters" and below that in the box it
says "Internally illuminated reverse channel letters with LEDS Can you tell me which one it is? The "faces"
section says aluminum painted black and the sign shows red. I realize they want it to be red, but the sign
rendering needs to match the text. I wasn't sure which Sign Craft person to contact on this.
Lastly, on #7 please change Chapter 25 to Chapter 25.07. That is the specific chapter for the sign ordinance.
Thank you for putting this all together. It is very nicely done. Please let me know on these issues. I appreciate it.
Thanks,
Rachel
Rctche.L'Boone'
Sign Reviewer
City of Carmel
Department of Community Services
3rd Floor
One Civic Square
Carmel, IN 46032
317.571.2417
317.571.2426 fax
http /www.ci _carmelinu /sery ices /communitys
Please consider the environment before printing this e -mail
5/20/2010