Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes Sub 11-29-07of CA �VNONE y�A C i t y RTOMORROW o /NDIMAN CARMEL PLAN COMMISSION SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE MINUTES TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 2007 LOCATION: CAUCUS ROOMS TIME: 6:00 P.M. CARMEL CITY HALL ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, IN 46032 DOORS OPEN AT 5:30 P.M. Representing the Committee Rick Ripma, Chairperson Jay Dorman Eric Seidensticker Carol Schleif Sally Shapiro Representing the Department Angie Conn Lisa Stewart Of Counsel: John Molitor Rick Ripma, Chairman called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Mr. Ripma reviewed the Docket Items for the meeting. The Subdivision Committee will meet to consider the following items: 1. Docket No. 07070010 PP: Trillium The applicant seeks primary plat approval for 57 residential lots on 32.447 acres. The site is located at 2555 W 131st St. and is zoned S -2 /Residence -ROSO. Filed by Dennis Olmstead of Stoeppelwerth Assoc, Inc. Steve Hardin of Baker and Daniels presented. He was accompanied by Peter Adams of Adams and Marshall, Gordon Krietz, Jesse Pohlman and Tracy Cox. Mr. Harden did a review of outstanding issues from the last meeting. The petitioner has spoken with the Engineering and Planning Departments and everyone is in agreement that the project meets the ordinances. Page 1 of 12 ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571 -2417 November 29, 2007 Plan Commission Subdivision Committee Minutes Angie Conn, DOCS indicated that all issues in the Department Report have been addressed and the City Forester has tentatively approved the landscape plan, and this afternoon the Engineering Department has indicated that all of their issues have been resolved. The Department recommends that this item be forwarded to the December 18 meeting of the Plan Commission with a favorable recommendation. Carol Schleif indicated she had continued concerns with the buffer and the quality of the buffer. Jay Dorman stated that it appears that Scott Brewer, City Forester is comfortable with either 7 or 12 ft. trees in the buffer area. Carol stated that one area was done satisfactory, however, some of the plants are deciduous. Carol had requested that the entire buffer be evergreens, the same number of trees that are there, but with no deciduous. The evergreens will stay green and effective all year. She explained that if deciduous trees are used in the winter all you end up with is a twig. Carol stated she does want to design it for the petitioner, but this is the way she wants the project to go. Jay asked if the Forester has approved the plan and are we countermanding what he has approved. Carol referred back to her drawing of what the area would like in the wintertime with deciduous trees. She stated that the petitioner's drawings are summertime drawings, but does not accurately depict what the area will look like in the winter. We want to shield views of people driving by or walking by down the street. Carol stated she has spoken with Scott and he has no problem with evergreens. Steve Hardin stated that the petitioner is trying to follow the ordinance as written, and they feel they have done this. He introduced Tracy Cox, landscape architect who is here to answer questions. Tracy Cox stated she spoke with Scott Brewer yesterday and they reviewed the ordinance which states mixture of evergreens, deciduous and shrubs should be used, and when they are put together you end up with a nice mix. Tracy explained with this combination get seasonal color; you also have multiple heights, spring flowers and this gives an all season interest. Typically, if we were to go all spruces, then you just have a wall of green. Carol stated that a wall is what she is looking for. Carol stated that only during the summer will you get color, etc. You have visibility from 3 ft. up. Tracy state that the viburnum's will grow to 6 ft., Carol replied that in the winter they are just sticks Tracy indicated that they gave great fall color and spring flowering. Carol reiterated 7 months of the year you have sticks. Pete Adams asked if they met the ordinance. Carol stated that the ordinance does call for a mix but in this case the petitioner was allowed to have 2 streets and for the Committee to allow this they need to have enhanced buffering. Steve Hardin stated the petitioner is trying to have balance throughout the year with color, etc. Carol Schleif stated the petitioner did not follow the ordinance in regards to street placement, so this enhanced buffering is necessary. It was determined that Carol Schleif, Scott Brewer, Tracy Cox and Steve Hardin will meet to resolve this issues prior to the Plan Commission meeting on December 18 Results of their meeting will be brought the meeting. Page 2 of 12 ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571 -2417 November 29, 2007 Plan Commission Subdivision Committee Minutes Rick Ripma would like to see specific garage door commitments, using the designs shown. Pete Adams agreed he will put specific garage door options into the commitments. Jay Dorman made a motion to approve Docket No. 07070010 PP: Trillium With the two following conditions: 1. A meeting will held to discus the buffer yard with the intent of enhancing the amount evergreens in that location. 2. The developer's will make commitment to use only garage doors included in the packet. 3. Eric Seidensticker seconded the motion. Approved 5 -0 2. Chesterton Woods Subdivision Waiver The applicant seeks the following subdivision waiver approval: Docket No. 07070043 SW SCO Chapter 7.05.07 percent of woodland clearing The site is located at 2405 E 99th Street, near Haverstick Rd. and is zoned S- 2 /Residence- ROSO III. Filed by Matt Skelton of Baker Daniels LLP for 56th Development, LLC. Matt Skelton presented for the petitioner. He was accompanied by Mark Humphrey of 56 St. Development. Matt reviewed the items that were updated since the last meeting. At the last meeting drainage issues for the whole area were discussed. Since the last Sub Committee meeting the petitioner has met with Fred Glaser, Engineering, Lucy Snyder, City Council and Gershman Brown, Steve Pittman. This team is planning a way to remedy the situation drainage wise for the whole area long term. The next step is to retain an engineering firm to study the area and come up with a plan. The petitioner is confident that a solution is on the horizon. In regard to the landscape plan, Matt stated this was really a tree preservation plan. The petitioner was asked to inventory trees on this site and report back to the Committee. We did complete an inventory. We submitted the results of the inventory to the Committee and Scott Brewer in advance of the meeting. We have shared with Scott our commitment to have a Registered Consulting Arborist on site when each individual home is sited, and Scott was pleased with this; it has never been done here before. Scott agrees we have preserved as many trees as we can with this plan. We have been able to preserve an additional percent since our last meeting. We have doubled up our drainage easement with our pathway easements and came up with some creative solutions, this is absolutely the last we can get from this site. Jud Scott who will the Registered Consulting Arborist for this project is unable to attend this evenings meeting, he has however, sent a letter indicating his approval. Angie Conn, indicated that the City Forester does view the tree inventory as accurate, but he also has concerns about the high percentage of tree removal and the Department feels similarly, but regardless of that the Department feels the Committee should vote on this tonight either positive or negative and just move on to the December 18 Plan Commission meeting. Page 3 of 12 ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571 -2417 November 29, 2007 Plan Commission Subdivision Committee Minutes Jay Dorman asked the petitioner of the trees inventoried what percentage of those that are 16" or better will not be preserved. Matt reviewed the preservation on a visual. More may be saved as we place the homes on the sites. This will be a site by site decision. Matt indicated that the petitioner has also agreed to off site tree mediation with the Parks Dept. Sally Shapiro responded to questions as to what off site tree mediation is. Sally responded that this is an opportunity for the developer to plant trees in other areas of Carmel, when they are not able to preserve all the trees. These would be off -site i.e., Central Park. Jay Dorman made a motion for a favorable recommendation for Docket No. 07070043 SW SCO Chapter 7.05.07 percent of woodland clearing With the commitment: That the developer will employ an arborist as defined in the letter from Vine and Branch, to review the trees when each lot is ready to built on. Carol Schleif seconded the motion Approved 5 -0 3. TABLED TO JANUARY 8: Docket No. 07010008 Z: 116th Guilford Rezone The applicant seeks to rezone approximately 9.5 acres from I -1 /Industrial to R -1 /Residence. The site is located at 1441 S. Guilford Rd. Filed by the Carmel Dept. of Community Services. 4 -6. Docket No. 07080031 PP: Wellsprings of West Clay The applicant seeks primary plat approval for 11 lots on 14.3 acres. Also, subdivision waivers requested are: Docket No. 07080032 SW SCO 6.05.07 homes facing an arterial/collector road Docket No. 07080033 SW SCO 6.03.07 cul -de -sac length The site is located at approximately 12210 Shelborne Rd. and is zoned S -1 /Residence. Filed by S. Kurt Menner of Lifesprings Group, LLC. Charlie Frankenberger presented for the petitioner. He was accompanied by Kurt Menner, Lifesprings Group, owners Tom Jones and Michael Sunstall, realtor Peggy Verdon and Gordon Krietz of Stoeppelwerth. He gave a brief overview of the project and Committee recommendations from the last meeting. At the last meeting Charlie had indicated that the decorative wall would be brick, it is in fact, going to be brick. Since delivery of the brochures for tonight's meeting the engineering plans and site grade have become more detailed and it has been determined that we will lose some of the trees we thought we could save. Having learned this, the petitioner met with Scott Brewer DOCS and reviewed the situation. Scott understood that the density of this plat is so low that ROSO doesn't apply and the tree preservation of ROSO also does not apply. The petitioner has agreed to a tree mediation plan for each of the additional 12- 14 trees that might be lost. Other matters worked on since the last meeting: Per the Committee's suggestion we have widened the radius of the cul -de -sac to accommodate larger vehicles, including moving vans. We have consulted with Engineering and we will implement their suggestions about replacing some of the pavement with stamped concrete. Page 4 of 12 ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571 -2417 November 29, 2007 Plan Commission Subdivision Committee Minutes The petitioner shared drawings showing the revised cul -de -sac and the replacement of the pavement with stamped concrete. This will be a traffic calming device. Charlie then directed the committee to review the rendering of the right -of -way west of the cul- de -sac which extends to the end of the property this is not going to be extended. The reason for this is we do not know when or if this land will be developed. We will agree to record a document with the Hamilton County Recorder advising them that this may connect in the future and the right of way is dedicated, this will be on the home owners plat. The petitioner has also included a drawing of the pond showing a gradual slope and the 10 ft. safety ledge. The pond complies in all respects with all requirements. Finally, the architectural commitments have been revised to prohibit front loading garages.. Angie Conn, within the last few hours she has spoken with the City Forester and the city engineering department. The Engineering Department indicates all of their issues have been resolved. The City Forester has provided tentative approval of the tree preservation plan. Carol Schleif made a motion to send to the full Plan Commission with a favorable recommendation Docket No. 07080031 PP: Wellsprings of West Clay Docket No. 07080032 SW SCO 6.05.07 homes facing an arterial/collector road Docket No. 07080033 SW SCO 6.03.07 cul -de -sac length Jay Dorman seconded the motion Approved 5 -0 7 -10. Docket No. 07080036 PP: Rosado Hill The applicant seeks primary plat approval for 3 lots on 9.05 acres. Also, subdivision waivers requested are: Docket No. 07080038 SW SCO 6.05.01 all lots shall abut a public right of way Docket No. 07080039 SW SCO 6.05.07 6.03.19 homes must face a parkway /arterial road Docket No. 07080040 SW SCO 8.09.02 installation of paths /sidewalks The site is located at the southeast corner of 106th St. Spring Mill Rd. and is zoned S- 2 /Residence. Filed by Joseph Scimia of Baker Daniels, LLP. Joseph Scimia presented for the petitioners. Since the last meeting the issues that were open for discussion were final approval for tree preservation by the City Forester, we have submitted a revised tree preservation plan that contains descriptions as well as graphic displays of it. Angie has received an email today from the Forester indicating his approve. The other issue was how we were going to handle the sidewalk situation and the petitioners have withdrawn their request for waivers on the sidewalk standards. After going through the process and meeting with the county engineer we have decided it will be best to just go and put them in, but based upon the configuration, we have identified a location to put them. At this time all issues have been resolved. Angie Conn, City forester has accepted their new tree preservation plan, one minor thing, a tree Page 5 of 12 ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571 -2417 November 29, 2007 Plan Commission Subdivision Committee Minutes that was to be preserved. The Department recommends that this be sent to the December 18 Plan Commission meeting with a positive recommendation. Jay Dorman made motion to approve the following docket numbers including the withdrawal of Docket No. 07080040 SW SCO 8.09.02 per request of the petitioner. Docket No. 07080036 PP: Rosado Hill Docket No. 07080038 SW SCO 6.05.01 all lots shall abut a public right of way Docket No. 07080039 SW SCO 6.05.07 6.03.19 homes must face a parkway /arterial road Eric Seidensticker seconded the motion Approved 5 -0 11. Docket No. 07070059 DP /ADLS: 531 S Guilford Rd Kousa Street Cottages) The applicant seeks site plan and design approval for 33 single family homes on 6 acres. The site is located at 531 S Guilford Rd. and is zoned B -7 /Business. Filed by Justin Moffett of Uptown Partners, LLC. 12 -15. Docket No. 07080024 PP: Kousa Street Cottages (531 S Guilford Rd) The applicant seeks primary plat approval for 33 lots on 6 acres. Also, subdivision waivers requested are: Docket No. 07080025 SW SCO 8.09.01 sidewalks on both sides of street Docket No. 07080026 SW SCO 6.03.20 private streets Docket No. 07080027 SW SCO 6.05.01 minimum lot width of 50 -ft at R/W The site is located at 531 S Guilford Rd. and is zoned B -7 /Business. Filed by Jim Shinaver of Nelson Frankenberger for Uptown Partners, LLC. File: SUB 2007- 1129.doc Jim Shinaver presented for the petitioner. He was accompanied by Justin Moffat and John Helton of Uptown Partners and Jim Shields of Weihe Engineering. New visuals of plans were distributed by Justin while Jim gave his presentation. These refer to items that were on the Department Report and others areas that have slightly tweaked since the packets were distributed, they include new elevations. Jim began a review of the Department Report This site was rezoned in the 1980's from a residential classification to a business classification for a church office use. The petitioner seeks primary plat, development plan, and site design approval for a residential development of 40 units on 6.08 acres (formerly 33 units). However, the petitioner has proposed the idea of preparing a Horizontal Property Regime (HPR) application for condominium units, instead of a primary plat. The HPR application only involves administrative review /approval. This is a density of 6.6 units per acre. The buildings will be duplexes and triples, rather than the initially proposed single family homes. The homes along Guilford Ave will face that street and have garage alley access. Most of the wooded area will be preserved, and the detention area will be natural in shape and landscaping. Page 6 of 12 ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571 -2417 November 29, 2007 Plan Commission Subdivision Committee Minutes The site is surrounded by single family homes and town homes, as well as a school. The petitioners have been urged to commit to the Draft Residential Architectural Design Guidelines, or make some architectural design commitments of their own. The individual units within the buildings have been staggered to `breakup' the view and provide for variation. Please see the petitioner's informational packet for more detail. Five —foot wide walks are provided throughout the development, which will connect to the path along Guilford Rd. The following issues were discussed: 1. Scott Brewer, City Forester will need time to re- review the altered landscape plan, which he just received on 11/14/2007. It is better and on the right track to approval. The petitioner received an email from Scott today, he is still working with our landscape architect on the tree species issue and this will be resolved. Another concern that Scott had was the removal of the southern sidewalk and his final item related to the eastern property line he would like to see more planting there or a vegetation Swale. As part of the site layout there will be a drainage swale along that eastern property line and the landscape architect will continue to work with Scott Brewer. 2. The petitioner has received a response from Gary Duncan today where he has set forth items he would like us to address. My impression was a lot of the elements are parts that would be finalized as you go through the construction phase of a project and so it is our intent to continue to work with Engineering on these issues. 3. The petitioner has agreed to make a contribution to the Non Reverting Thoroughfare Fund in lieu of installing sidewalks at this time. 4. Lighting /Photometric Plan: Please show the foot candle measurements at the property lines of the development. Try to keep the measurement at or below 0.3 foot candles. A visual was distributed. This does meet the requirement of the ordinance. 5. Please provide color building elevations (all 4 sides) with materials and dimensions labeled. These were distributed. 6. Copies of full size (24" x 36 revised plans, landscape plan, and elevations are requested. These have been submitted to Engineering 7. DOCS and the Engineering Dept will need a final copy of the drainage calculations. Those have been submitted to Engineering by Jim Shields. 8. DOCS urges the petitioner to use green/sustainable development practices, such as pervious pavers or green building techniques. Justin stated that he has a builder partner; they have reviewed a list of possible LEED items that may be feasible on this project. The entire wetland area will be saved Page 7 of 12 ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571 -2417 November 29, 2007 Plan Commission Subdivision Committee Minutes and used and a natural drainage area. Scott Brewer is working with the landscaper for Uptown Partners on correct species. In the area of construction they will initial a recycling program. Another objective is to use 50% of certifiable, sustainable wood, use low "E" solvents and adhesives. Use recycled content decorative roof accents, use formaldehyde free insulation, use fiber cement siding. Specific to mechanicals, alternative ventilation methods for circulation of outdoor air will be used. One standard which is important is the HVAC system will meet the standard Thermal Comfort Conditions for Human Occupancy, on demand water heating systems, low flow appliances, and regarding finish materials, recycled carpet, sustainable harvested wood flooring, low voc paints and formaldehyde free cabinetry. 9. Per the Alternative Transportation Plan (ATP), a 10 -ft wide multiuse asphalt path is required along Guilford Rd (not a 5 -ft wide sidewalk). 10. The Department suggests moving the southernmost sidewalk location to be adjacent to the southernmost private drive, instead of traversing through the natural area. This has been removed from the plan, due to conversations with Angie and Scott Brewer. 11. Show /label the bike parking area on site plan, Sheet C001; 7 bike racks are required (14 spaces). Bike parking has been labeled. 12. Please show the mechanical equipment locations and how they are screened from view. This is on 2n page of base landscape plan. Sally asked about the ones that have driveways on both sides. Justin indicated it would still be hidden by shrubbery in the middle and side to side. 13. The driveway on unit 40 seems a bit narrow; can a vehicle maneuver easily in/out? This was addressed in the first Plan Commission meeting. On lot 40, the answer to the question is that the tree canopy goes over the actual concrete area, so there is sufficient room 14. Please address garbage truck turnaround within the site. Attached to the 2n page of the black and white site plan. We have provided the plan to show how this will function. 15. DOCS is still reviewing the petitioner's Nov. 20 response letter. The following comments were made at the Nov. 20 Plan Commission meeting: 1. One resident stated he was in support of the plan, with the condition that the petitioner implement the plantings on his side of the property line and build the fence prior to the buildings' construction, as they discussed in prior meetings. The commitment made to surrounding neighbors is still in effect, to provide them with some plantings on their side of the property, and build a fence prior to construction Page 8 of 12 ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571 -2417 November 29, 2007 Plan Commission Subdivision Committee Minutes 2. Make the facades facing Guilford Rd have more detail, such as adding a porch. Facades along Guilford with more detail and that ahs been provided in the new elevation drawing set. 3. Bring 3 -4 options of garage doors to the committee, and commit to choosing from those options. Justin has provided renderings of garage door options on the last page of the elevation set, if this meets the Committee approval a commitment will be made on these. 4. Add additional landscaping on Unit 10, since its side faces Guilford Rd. The petitioner explained better is that if you look at the overall landscape plan for unit 10 there are plantings that are proposed as part of the perimeter plantings proposal, but then on top of that you would then also have what is on the base planting requirements. If you would like us to incorporate a few more plantings along the western edge, we are open to that. Angie Conn, stated that Scott Brewer, City Forester would like to see more trees along the east buffer or a vegetative swale, but other than that he is comfortable. The Department does recommend that this Committee forward this on to the full Plan Commission. Discussion was held on the time of the Guilford Rd. street project. Angie indicate it likely to be started in the couple of years. The Committee also requested to know what type of fence will be on the ease side of the property Justin indicated in the landscape plan there is a commitment that was agreed to at the BZA level fence built to Carmel standard of one brick column every 24 ft. with wood fence between them. Jay Dorman then asked how the project grew from 32 units to 40 units. Justin answered that the site is zoned B7 and there is a calculation used on sq. footage of the site to determine density allowed. Our understanding is that we are here in an ADLS/DP process looking at overall architecture and site design, but density is determined by the underlying zoning, and the underlying zoning indicates we can put 52 units on the site. When we came with the cottage product up front at the BZA level we felt we could go with a lower density, when we responded to staff comment of making them front load garages to increase buffering in the rear, the 30 ft. cottage just did not fly, so making an attached project make more sense. Since we cannot sell the attached units at the same price as a single cottage we had to increase the density. It is a B7 zoning, it is commercial we could put an assisted living project here on this site. We are trying to do something that is less impactful than what we are allowed to but it is what it is. Jay asked Angie for clarification on the density. She indicated that it is a unique site that happens to be zoned B7. It does work to their advantage. Jay suggested that the Committee communicate something back to the BZA regarding explanation of the change of density. Angie indicated that we could prepare a memo in the department report portion of the meeting and give them an update for the BZA. Carol Schleif asked about Horizontal Property Regime. That she could not find it in the zoning Page 9 of 12 ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571 -2417 November 29, 2007 Plan Commission Subdivision Committee Minutes ordinances. Angie replied that this HPR is primarily a state statute regulation. Justin went on to explain HPR that this is simply the way the land is zoned. We could do fee simple where we divide up each unit has its parcel and the parcel ends at the wall of the unit or we can have an HOA own the whole site which becomes a HPR they have easement to their unit, they are responsible for the maintenance within the unit, but it operates like a condo association and the association maintains the entire exterior of the unit and the landscape and the street infrastructure, etc. It is the ownership of the land. Jim Shinaver continued the explanation that under state law you are permitted a multi family project like this to present as a HPR and State law has requirements that you need to meet and the way the city ordinances adopt that state ordinance is that you have to submit plans through the planning department for an administrative review and the Department of Engineering your HPR documents which would consist of how you set up the HPR and also the covenants that govern the maintenance of the property and real estate and if you meet the state requirements and the internal DOE requirements then you are issued you building permits. It is similar to a plat process, however, in this type of project you will own your unit along with 1140' interest in the overall development. By virtue of that type of ownership and the covenants that govern the neighborhood, it requires each owner to submit into the HOA fund an appropriate amount to take care of the maintenance issues on the exteriors of the structures, lawn maintenance, irrigation systems, etc. Justin replied that during staff review process they confirm that we comply with the density allowed within the development with the setbacks, etc. and staff has indicated we comply. John Molitor stated that when you have condos you are not subject to the Subdivision Control Ordinance, you still have to comply with zoning. Jay indicated he will share the commitments that are used in his development. One of the problems that his development ran into and you may want to keep in mind is the placement of satellite dishes, you may want to limit those, that you put them only on the rear of the house and if that is not possible do not allow them. Also, since you have limited parking you should confine parking to just overnight. Lot 10, if there is a privacy fence that the homeowner wants to put in, you should regulate the style of fence. Rick Ripma asked about regulations on private streets. Previously these had been troublesome, why is this one not? Angie replied that it has to do with the HPR and the Subdivision Control Ordinance does not come into play with this type of project. She did emphasize that they still have build the streets to city standards. Justin clarified that it is not dimensional standards, it is construction standards. Rick asked that since the streets are not at City width standard what will happen if the HOA comes to us and asked the City to take the streets, would we take them or not because they are to narrow. Angie stated that is why the Engineering Dept. is reviewing this now with the ADLS and the petitioner is working this out with the Engineering Dept. Rick asked when that will be done. Angie replied it is an ongoing review with this application. It goes with the construction documents that they have to get approved regardless of Plan Commission's approval. A lengthy discussion was held relative to the project coming under the HPR Horizontal Property Page 10 of 12 ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571 -2417 November 29, 2007 Plan Commission Subdivision Committee Minutes Regime jurisdiction. Some members of the Committee were not comfortable with this; however, Jim Shinaver stated that this absolutely follows the letter of the law. Discussion turned to the length of driveways after discussion it was decided to increase driveway length to 21' at each unit. Carol Schleif brought up the need for natural light, particularly in the middle units and indicated this would be a great spot for skylights or tube lights 1 10" tube light will light up a 10 x 10 room. Justin will meet with Carol to further discuss. Garage doors were discussed. Carol wants doors with windows Justin will commit to this. Jay Dorman made a motion to approve Docket No. 07070059 DP /ADLS: 531 S Guilford Rd Kousa Street Cottages) Docket No. 07080024 PP: Kousa Street Cottages (531 S Guilford Rd) The following are not longer required: Docket No. 07080025 SW SCO 8.09.01 sidewalks on both sides of street Docket No. 07080026 SW SCO 6.03.20 private streets Docket No. 07080027 SW SCO 6.05.01 minimum lot width of 50 -ft at R/W With the following conditions: The stipulation that five of the six garage doors will have windows, satellite dishes will be placed so they are not fronting a public street or someone else's line of sight within the community, guest parking should be overnight only not extended stay Sally Shapiro seconded the motion. Approved 5 -0 Rick Ripma, Chairperson Lisa Stewart Page 11 of 12 ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571 -2417