HomeMy WebLinkAboutDept Report 09-01-09 CARMEL PLAN COMMISSION
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEEE
DEPARTMENT REPORT
SEPTEMBER 1, 2009
3. Docket No. 09040007 PP Amend: D Wilkinson's Addition, Lots 13 -15 (Rangeline Commercial)
The applicant seeks primary plat amendment approval to create 5 lots from 3 and also seeks the following
waiver: Docket No. 09040008 SW SCO 6.05.01 lot with 50 -ft
The site is located at 411,421,431 N Rangeline Rd. It is zoned B -5 /Business within the Historic Rangeline
Subarea of the Old Town Overlay. Filed by Steve Schutz of I.E. hrvestments, LLC.
The applicant seeks to replat 3 existing lots into 5 lots. These lots are located within the Historic Rangeline Sub -area of
the Old Town Overlay. Three of the structures were considered Contributing Buildings. The subdivision waiver sought
will allow the lot widths of the new lots to be less than 50 -ft wide; the Subdivision Control Ordinance requires lot
widths of 50 -ft or greater, at the road right of way. This reduction makes sense, since the lots in Old Town are mostly
small, 60 -ft wide or less. The historic Peele House will relocate from its original location on West Main Street to the
southeast portion of this site. The petitioner proposes first floor office /commercial uses with residential uses on the
second floors. Please refer to the informational packet for further detail.
Per Old Town Overlay regulations, DOCS will administratively review /approve the Site Plan Design Review (SDR)
application for this project, which includes review of the building architecture, site design, landscaping, lighting,
signage, etc.
The petitioner received variance approvals (with commitments) from the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA), at the
August 24 meeting, for lot width reductions down to 45 -feet and for lot coverage increases to 60% for residential and
80% for commercial uses. The commitments are: that the alley will remain open and improved, that walkways on
Range Line Rd. and 4 St. are part of project, and that porous pavement will be utilized.
While the Department, overall, is in support of the request, which will help preserve some buildings within Old Town
at a new location, there are some concerns with the site design. In particular, the north/south alley is proposed to be
closed by a curb partway up its length. Closing the alley, even in part, would make future through access difficult, as
well as limiting ingress /egress options on the site and adjacent sites. The alley should be left open and improved.
Additionally, access to the house proposed at the southeast corner would also be from this alley. Access to the house
and to the rest of the site would be divided by what is essentially a large parking island. The island should be enlarged
and moved to the north to both preserve an existing large tree, and provide greater separation between the two access
points. This would also ease access to both sites; access to the main site currently is awkward and could be difficult
for large vehicles to navigate.
July 21 Plan Commission meeting comments /questions /requests:
Many remonstrators voiced concerns about increasing the number of lots on this site, placing larger buildings on
smaller lots, preserving the historic character of Old Town, and the Peele House relocation and placement of it on a
similar sized lot.
The Commission requested a copy of the written correspondence between the Planning Director the petitioner
regarding the teardown of the contributing buildings, a copy of the current site layout, and a copy of the current
landscape plan.
August 12 Committee meeting comments /concerns:
The lot widths (current and proposed) and distances between buildings were discussed.
The petitioner's ultimate goal is to relocate historical houses to this site.
One potential house to re- locate is currently located at 241 W. Main Street.
Some discussion about the Peele House and how it was re- located to this site.
Suggestions about adding T- or L- shaped floor plans of buildings and varying the mass of each building.
The petitioner is moving in the right direction.
Staff comments /concerns:
1. DOCS and the Subd. Committee needs copies of the revised site plan that came from the Aug. 24 BZA meeting.
2. DOCS needs additional details for a complete SDR application: the proposed building architecture, dumpster
location and screening, light fixtures, signage plan, bike parking location and details, etc The Hamilton County
Surveyor's Office has no issues with this project.
3. The Hamilton County Highway Dept has no comment, since this is not in their jurisdiction.
4. The Dept of Engineering (DOE) has many issues with the primary plat amendment plans. Drainage, storm water
detention, sidewalks, alley improvements, and traffic flow are just a few of the concerns. Petitioner should give an
update on the approval status of the Engineering Dept.
5. The Forestry Dept has recently requested some changes to the landscape plan, such as tree protection fencing,
adding more shade trees, and preserving an additional existing tree. A revised landscape plan should be submitted.
6. The Plan Commission Rules of Procedure Article XI, Section 3.B states: "...In addition, pursuant to IC 36-7-4
402(d), the Commission hereby designates and empowers the Subdivision Committee to review, and approve or
disapprove, all Primary Plat Amendment petitions that are filed with and docketed by DOCS." While the
Subdivision Committee can approve the Primary Plat Amendment item, the Subdivision Waiver item must still go
back to the full Plan Commission for a final vote.
The Dept of Community Services (DOCS) recommends that the committee discusses these items and then tables
them to the October 6 committee meeting, to allow the petitioner time to address all outstanding issues. (If the
committee votes this evening and approves the plan, the Dep't suggests adding the following conditions: providing the
revised site plan, City Forestry Dept approval of the landscape plan and tree preservation plan, and Engineering Dept
approval of the construction plans, prior to submitting the Secondary /Final Plat application.)