HomeMy WebLinkAboutDept Report 08-04-09 CARMEL PLAN COMMISSION
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEEE
DEPARTMENT REPORT
AUGUST 4, 2009
1. Docket No. 09040007 PP Amend: D Wilkinson's Addition, Lots 13 -15 (Rangeline Commercial)
The applicant seeks primary plat amendment approval to create 5 lots from 3 and also seeks the
following waiver: Docket No. 09040008 SW SCO 6.05.01 lot with 50 -ft
The site is located at 411,421,431 N Rangeline Rd. It is zoned B -5 /Business within the Historic
Rangeline Subarea of the Old Town Overlay. Filed by Steve Schutz of I.E. Investments, LLC.
The August 4 Subdivision committee meeting has been cancelled. A rescheduled meeting date will soon be
announced.
The applicant seeks to replat 3 existing lots into 5 lots. These lots are located within the Historic Rangeline Sub
area of the Old Town Overlay. Three of the structures were considered Contributing Buildings. The subdivision
waiver sought will allow the lot widths of the new lots to be less than 50 -ft wide; the Subdivision Control
Ordinance requires lot widths of 50 -ft or greater, at the road right of way. This reduction makes sense, since the
lots in Old Town are mostly small, 60 -ft wide or less. The historic Peele House will relocate from its original
location on West Main Street to the southeast portion of this site. The petitioner proposes first floor
office /commercial uses with residential uses on the second floors. Please refer to the informational packet for
further detail.
Per Old Town Overlay regulations, DOCS will administratively review /approve the Site Plan Design Review
(SDR) application for this project, which includes review of the building architecture, site design, landscaping,
lighting, signage, etc.
The petitioner will also request variances from the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA), at the August 24 meeting,
for lot width reductions down to 45 -feet and for lot coverage increases to 60% for residential and 80% for
commercial uses.
While the Department, overall, is in support of the request, which will help preserve some buildings within Old
Town at a new location, there are some concerns with the site design. In particular, the north/south alley is
proposed to be closed by a curb partway up its length. Closing the alley, even in part, would make future
through access difficult, as well as limiting ingress /egress options on the site and adjacent sites. The alley
should be left open and improved. Additionally, access to the house proposed at the southeast corner would also
be from this alley. Access to the house and to the rest of the site would be divided by what is essentially a large
parking island. The island should be enlarged and moved to the north to both preserve an existing large tree,
and provide greater separation between the two access points. This would also ease access to both sites; access
to the main site currently is awkward and could be difficult for large vehicles to navigate.
July 21 Plan Commission meeting comments /questions /requests:
Many remonstrators voiced concerns about increasing the number of lots on this site, placing larger buildings
on smaller lots, preserving the historic character of Old Town, and the Peele House relocation and placement of
it on a similar sized lot.
The Commission requested a copy of the written correspondence between the Planning Director the
petitioner regarding the teardown of the contributing buildings, a copy of the current site layout, and a copy of
the current landscape plan.
Staff comments /concerns:
1. The Hamilton County Surveyor's Office has no issues with this project.
2. The Hamilton County Highway Dept has no comment, since this is not in their jurisdiction.
3. The Dept of Engineering (DOE) has many issues with the primary plat amendment plans. Drainage,
storm water detention, sidewalks, alley improvements, and traffic flow are just a few of the concerns.
Petitioner should give an update on the approval status of the Engineering Dept.
4. The Forestry Dept has recently requested some changes to the landscape plan, such as tree protection
fencing, adding more shade trees, and preserving an additional existing tree. A revised landscape plan
should be submitted.
5. DOCS needs additional details for a complete SDR application: the proposed building architecture,
dumpster location and screening, light fixtures, signage plan, bike parking location and details, etc.
The Plan Commission Rules of Procedure Article XI, Section 3.B states: "...In addition, pursuant to IC 36-7-4
402(d), the Commission hereby designates and empowers the Subdivision Committee to review, and approve or
disapprove, all Primary Plat Amendment petitions that are filed with and docketed by DOCS." While the
Subdivision Committee can approve the Primary Plat Amendment item, the Subdivision Waiver item must still
go back to the full Plan Commission for a final vote.
The Dept of Community Services (DOCS) recommends that these items be briefly discussed and
then continued to the September 1 Subdivision Committee meeting for further review and
discussion.