No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFence ApprovalConn, Angelina V From: Conn, Angelina V Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 11:28 AM To: 'awards @hughes.net Cc: Littlejohn, David W; 'Cindy Armour'; 'Brent Claymon'; Hollibaugh, Mike P; Duncan, Gary R; 'mark.wood @sug.com' Subject: RE: Bridlebourne Subdivision Fence Proposal Attachments: Bridlebourne Fence Proposal.docx; RE: Bridlebourne Fence Proposal Good Morning, Andy please accept this email as administrative approval of the fence design and placement by the Carmel Planning /Zoning Dept. A copy of this email and its attachments will be placed in the file for this subdivision. Also attached is a link to the thoroughfare plan online: http: /www.ci.carmel.in.us/ services DOCS /C3planpdf2010 /Thoroughfare %20PIan %20Map.pdf please make sure the fence is located outside of the proposed road right of way, and please make sure that you have checked with the Engineering Dept. to make sure there are no issues. -Angie Conn, Planning Administrator From: Awards Fence, Andy Mills [mailto:awards©hughes.net] Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 1:22 PM To: 'Brent Claymon'; mark.wood©sug.com; Littlejohn, David W Cc: abrickmans @sbcglobal.net Subject: Bridlebourne Subdivision Fence Proposal Brent, Mark, David Please see attached for the fence and brick column proposal we discussed. David and Mark I think Brent would appreciate something in writing with your approval for this location. Andy Mills Awards Fence Deck 773 -2003 PHONE 773 -6208 FAX Conn, Angelina V From: Awards Fence, Andy Mills [awards @hughes.net] Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 2:39 PM To: Littlejohn, David W; Mindham, Daren; McBride, Mike T; Hollibaugh, Mike P Cc: 'Cindy Armour'; 'Brent Claymon' Subject: RE: Bridlebourne Fence Proposal David Thanks, Andy Mills Awards Fence Deck 773 -2003 PHONE 773 -6208 FAX Gentlemen Please advise. Thank you, Andy Mills Awards Fence Deck 773 -2003 PHONE 1 I am following up on my August 5 email below. The HOA Bridlebourne is ready to move forward with their fence project. They would like verification from the City that you have no objection to their proposed placement and that it would not interfere with future expansion of Shelbourne Rd. or the addition of a bike path. We would be happy to meet with someone on site if necessary. From: Awards Fence, Andy Mills [mailto:awards @hughes.net] Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 2:02 PM To: 'dlittlejohn @carmel.in.gov'; 'dmindham @carmel.in.gov'; 'mmcbrde @carmel.in.gov'; 'mhollibaugh @carmel.in.gov Cc: 'Cindy Armour'; 'Brent Claymon' Subject: Bridlebourne Fence Proposal I have talked to most of you concerning a proposed fence Bridlebourne (on Shelbourne, North of 106` We would like to confirm, in writing if possible, that all guidelines are followed, including fence style, fence placement, etc. The fence proposed is the same as what exists at the entrances today (see attached pictures). This is a 6' tali "wrought iron" fence. They would like to extend this fence between their entrances and on both their North and South border. The proposed fence line would include 10 -20 brick /limestone columns, also matching the existing entrances. I have met with Brent Claymon from the Board and we have a tentative proposal (and secondary proposal for the fence placement (see attached Word doc). Very few trees (5 10) would need to be moved or replaced to accommodate either of the proposed locations. I have listed the distance, in feet, from the edge of the road for the proposals along Shelbourne. The association wants to anticipate any future expansion of Shelbourne and addition of a walk /bike path on the East side of the road. It appears the existing path to the South of Bridlebourne, if extended to the North, would be very close to the secondary proposal (35' from the edge of the road). Also, we are aware of the pipeline(s) through this property. I have been in touch with Mark from Panhandle to make sure we follow all of their requirements as well.