Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCorrespondence 2010 9801 N Augusta DrKE ELER -WEBB ASSOCIATES Angie Conn Department of Community Services City of Carmel One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 November 22, 2010 Re.: Consulting Engineers Planners Surveyors TELEPHONE (317) 574 -0140 www keelerwebb com 486 Gradle Drive Carmel, Indiana 46032 Pro Care Horticultural Services 9801 North Augusta Drive Carmel, IN KWA Project No.: 1011 -002 REC D EIVE D 29 X10 ACS RESPONSE LETTER On November 1, 2010, the consulting engineering firm of Keeler -Webb Associates was retained by Mr. Lowell Rolsky, with Pro Care Horticultural Services, to conduct a surveying investigation to determine if parking on the property known as Pro Care Horticultural Services, located at 9801 North Augusta Drive, Carmel, IN, lies within the bounds of the property. This investigation was performed due to a Zoning Code Violation letter from the City of Carmel, dated August 19, 2010. This letter was issued based on; inaccurate parcel boundaries shown on the City of Carmel GIS mapping, which showed the southern gravel employee parking lot lying over the southern property line. Our review of the GIS mapping determined that there is a distance error of 20 feet in the overall North -South distance of the Pro Care property line dimension. Keeler -Webb Associates issued an ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey of the subject property, last revised on October 19, 1998. On November 3, 2010, an on -site inspection was performed and it was determined that the properties substantially match the conditions reflected in the survey. Additionally, we obtained and Aerial Photo of the subject property, provided by the City of Carmel, GIS mapping, dated 2009. This aerial photo closely represents the current condition of property. On November 8, 2010, a meeting was held at Carmel DOCS with DOCS staff, the owner, and land surveyor present. All of the above evidence was reviewed with staff at that time, and it was determined that there is no zoning code violation. Based upon the data collected, along with observations made at the time of our inspection and analysis, it is our surveying opinion that the southern gravel employee parking lot lies entirely within the bounds of the subject real estate. Furthermore, the North -South dimensions of the properties along the East side of North Augusta Drive (per the City of Carmel GIS parcel dimensions) do not match the deed distances. The opinions stated in this report are based upon the physical conditions present at the time of our inspection and the ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey of the subject real estate. Unless additional detail, assistance, or other land surveying effort is requested, this investigation is considered to be complete as per the scope of land surveying work required and no further professional support will be provided. Respectfully, KEELER -WEBB ASSOCIATES Adam L. DeHart, LS State of Indiana Registration No. 29500025 Project Manager C: \Users\Adam\ Documents \L ETTE R- REPORTS\ 101 1-002_PROCARE-ZONING-PARKING.doc 2 1011 ill 121 August 19, 2010 Lowell and Laura Rolsky 9801 Augusta Drive North Carmel, Indiana 46032 Respectfully, ONE CIVIC SQUARE City of Carmel DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES Division of Building and Code Enforcement Re: Zoning Cocle Violation Dear Mr. Mrs. Rolsky This letter is being provided to inform you that the parking of vehicles in the gravel lot at 9661 Augusta Drive North, is prohibited as per Carmel Zoning Ordinance, which states: 27.02.04 Parking spaces may be located on any part of a lot, unless otherwise specified herein. Parking spaces shall not be located in any required greenbelt or lawn area. 27.02.01 Off street parking spaces may be located on an area within three hundred (300) feet of said building and two or more owners of buildings may join together in providing the required parking spaces. Where the required parking spaces are not located on the same lot with the building or use served, the usage of the lot or tract upon which said parking spaces are provided shall be restricted by an instrument of record describing the premises for which said parking is provided and assuring the retention of such parking so long as required by this Ordinance. To avoid further enforcement action, please permanently discontinue parking vehicles on the unpaved site to the south, or provide the Department of Community Services with an updated site plan and instrument of record indicating permission to park on this site. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me at (317) 571 -2417. Christine Barton Holmes, LEED AP BD +C Planning Administrator Department of Community Services CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571 -2417 The public hearing was then closed. v AVk-e g-- 2.3 -\q`k9 Pat Rice moved for the approval of V- 56 -99, Duke Realty Seven Parkwood. APPROVED 3 -0. Pat Rice moved for the approval of V- 57 -99, Duke Realty Seven Parkwood. APPROVED 3 -0. Pat Rice moved for the approval of V- 58 -99, Duke Realty Seven Parkwood. APPROVED 3 -0. Items V -59 -99 and V -60 -99 were TABLED at the request of the Petitioner. I. Old Business li. Ameritech Telecommunications Tower (SE -7 -99) WITHDRAWN BY PETITIONER 2i. Ameritech Telecommunications Tower (V -8 -99) WITHDRAWN BY PETITIONER NOTE: Items 3i through 7i REMAIN TABLED UNTIL REOPENED BY THE DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR ADD -ON Pro -Care Landscaping (UV- 31 -99) Petitioner seeks Use Variance approval to allow an office expansion to the existing facility. The site is located on the northeast corner of 98 Street and North Augusta Drive within the North Augusta Subdivision. The site is zoned S- 1/Residence and is located within the Michigan Road Overlay Zone. Filed by Lowell Rolsky of Pro Care Lowell Rolsky of Pro Care, 9801 North August Road, appeared before the Board seeking approval for a Use Variance for a storage facility. The time for the approval granted at the BZA meeting in January, 1998 has now expired. The building is an architectural steel, pole barn building utilized for materials and equipment storage. All other aspects of the Use Variance have been completed: this is the only facet uncompleted. An agreement was reached with a neighbor, Michael Norris, to accomplish visual screening through additional landscaping S:\BZA\Minutes 999aug i it S: BZA\Minutes 1999aug X20 Cafe. Members of the public were invited to speak in favor or opposition to the petition, no one appeared. The current building proposed is less expensive than that originally proposed in January. 1998. and the angle of the building has been changed. Mr. Rolsky stated that there was a written agreement between Pro Care and Michael Norris. Mr. Rolsky agree to ish a copy o t e agreement to t e Department. Pat Rice moved for the approval of UV- 31 -99, Pro Care Landscaping. APPROVED 3- 0. 8i. Lakes at Hazeldell Clubhouse (SU- 37 -99) Petitioner seeks approval to construct a private recreation facility in an S -1 residential district. The site is located at the intersection of Hazel Glen and West Lake Boulevard. Filed by Richard Henderson of The Schneider Corporation. Charlie Frankenberger, attorney with Nelson and Frankenberger, 3021 East 98 Street, Indianapolis, appeared before the Board on behalf of Zaring Homes. The applicant is seeking approval to construct a swimming pool and amenity area in a residential community known as the Lakes at Hazeldell. Also present on behalf of Zaring Homes were Robert Krohngold and David George. At the initial hearing, Zaring was requested to change the dimensions of its pool and to agree that a lifeguard would be present at all time the pool is open. Zaring is willing to comply with both conditions but asks for the following consideration' The problem with the reconfiguration of the pool is two -fold. The petitioner has already obtained from the State the permit for the original design. If reconfigured, the process would take an additional twelve weeks and out of the current construction season. In addition, Zaring has stated that they have designed a pool more for family and recreational purposes than competitive swimming: more for lounging than laps In light of the hardship of waiting until next year's construction season, the applicant is asking the Board to reconsider their requirement. In regard to pool safety, in a pool of this size. the State has decided to remain silent and does not require a lifeguard. The Zoning Ordinance does not specifically address the issue. This is deemed to be a private matter. Residents would want the flexibility of enjoying the pool at will and not contingent upon the presence of a lifeguard. There are liability concerns and also concerns about how this requirement can consistently be applied to future pools. In short, the question is whether or not this is an area that we want to regulate. Based on the foregoing, the petitioner is asking that the Board reconsider its requirement of the presence of a lifeguard during pool hours. S-2-(2-4c L 1 :Pl4oi Uv 2 -91 U\1-31 ctc CARMEL .OARL OF ZONING APPEALS JANJARY 28, 1980 1 :T The regular meeting of the Board of Zoning Appeals was opened at 7230 P.M. by the Board attorney, Ray Adler, January 28, 1980 in City Hall. New Board of Zoning Appeals members Dr. Richard Dowell, Terry Litvan, Rev. Warren Saunders, Carl Geltz and Donna Skeens were sworn in by Mayor Reiman. Mr. Jerry York was sworn in by Hamilton County Circuit Court Judge Richard De Tar. Election of a chairman and vice chairman followed. Dr. Dowell nominated Jerry York for Chairman. Seconded by Mrs. Litvan. Rev. Saunders moved the nominations be closed. Seconded by Mr. Geltz. Mr. York was elected chairman and took over from Mr. Adler. Rev. Saunders nominated Mrs. Litvan for vice chairman. Seconded by Mrs. Skeens. Rev. Saunders moved the nominations be closed. Seconded by Mr. Geltz. Mrs. Litvan was elected vice chairman. Roll was called and members present weret Dr. Richard Dowell, Terry Litvan, Rev. Warren Saunders, Carl Geltz, Donna Skeens and Jerry York. Mrs. McCart, secretary, read the minutes of the December 19, 1979 meeting. There were no additions or corrections to those minutes and Mrs. Litvan moved that they be approved as submitted. Seconded by Mr. Geltz. Motion carried. Mr. York announced that agenda item lb, under Old Business, was tabled by the petitioner. Rev. Saunders moved that item lb be tabled for a period of 3 months. Seconded by Mrs. Skeens. The motion carried 5 to 1 (Mrs. Litvan voting No E. Public Hearings 0 -c la. 7 :30 P.M., Public Hearing on Docket No. BA 1 -80, Special Exception Application for Pr Nursery and Commercial Greenhouse, located at 98th Street an New ugusta Drive in S -1 zoning. Filed by Mort Rolsky. The Public Hearing opened at 8:03. Mr. Rolsky made the presentation showing the plans for a nursery and green house. There will be 6 parking lanes inside a fenced area which will be screened with landscaping. No remonstrators were present and the Public Hearing closed at 8 :06. Mr. Anderson commented regarding drainage and required set back stating that they are waiting for the report from the Dept. of Natural Resources. Mrs. McCart read the Technical Advisory Committee report, the Industrial and Commercial Committee report and the December Plan Commission minutes pertaining to this petition. Mr. York questioned the parking. Mr. Rolsky said there will be 6 parking spaces and only 3 are required by the ordinance. Mr. Rolsky said the pole barn is 40 ft. by 72 ft. and the greenhouse is 24 ft. by 42 ft. Miss Chapman, city planner, said they need to know the level of the 100 year flood. Mr. Rolsky said it will take 2 to 3 weeks for the report to come and requested approval subject to receiving the required report from the State. Mr. Rolsky stated that there will be no retail business here. Mrs. Litvan moved that BA 1 -80 be approved subject to receiving the report requested. Seconded by Dr. Dowell. The vote was unanimous for approval. 2a. 7 :45 P.M., Public Hearing on Docket No. BA 2 -80, Special Exception Application for Robert S. Bodner for 4 one -story office buildings, located on N.E. corner of 103rd and N. Meridian St. in EC -1 zoning. Filed by Robert S. Bodner. JAMES ANDERSON BUILDING COMMISSIONER July 28, 1980 Mr. Mort Rolsky Pro Care Nursery 8629 Cholla Road Indianapolis, Indiana 46240 Dear Mort: Sincerely, G 1. .2 t Cr- -at. Janes V. Anderson Building Commissioner JVA:sw CITY OF CARMEN Subject Property: 98th and New Augusta Drive Clay Township, Hamilton County Indiana 40 EAST MAIN STREET CARMEL. INDIANA 46032 844-6433 It has been brought to my attention by neighbor complaint and my inspector's report that you have several violations not permitted for the use of this land as approved. 1. The first complaint is a trailer being used for general nursery storage. Only construction trailers are permitted to be used while construction is in progress to facilitate telephone, plans and construction tools or instruments. 2. Storage shed constructed near or on fence. This is not in the original plans approved and no variance or permit has been granted for this. 3. Trash and open garbage are being dumped on the property. This also violates the Indiana Board of Health rules, as well as our ordinance, as this debris will draw rats and other rodents. This type of use is not in the original plans approved. This letter is to advise you that immediate compliance and corrections be made to your property. I would also advise that no future uses be considered without permits and to comply with the original approval of use of your land. A copy of this letter is being filed with the Board of Zoning Appeals this day, July 28, 1980, and the original handed to you, if present, or will be mailed by registered mail if you are not present. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS MINUTES JULY 28, 1980 Page 6 8 ft. Seconded by Mrs. Skeens. The vote was 5 to 0 for approval. Motion carried. r� G. New Business r r0' C CO/ 3g. Board to question decision concerning Pro Care Nursery, located at 98th and New Augusta Drive in S -1 zoning. Mort Rolsky and Mitch Rolsky were present. Mort Rolsky stated that it was called to his attention that two of the adjoining property owners did not receive notice for last January's Public Hearing. Mr. Rolsky said that that was not his fault but an error in the County Clerk's office. Warren Pettitt, W. 97th St., stated that on New Augusta Rd. only one house was notified and three should have been and they were not aware of the Public Hearing. Mr. Adler said if the people feel aggrieved they may appeal to the Circuit Court within 30 days of the meeting of the BZA. Mr. York related that the Board has no jurisdiction in this matter. Joe Hoover, W. 97th St., stated that they want assistance and that they wish to present their side. Mr. York asked if they have had advise of counsel and stated that the Board cannot at this time do anything and that the court is the place they should go. Jim Doom, adjoining property owner, questioned what recourse they have if Mr. Rolsky does not remove the trailer when he is through and if he does not keep his word. Remonstrators complained of the trailer, trash and garbage on the property Mr. Anderson submitted a letter to Mr. Rolsky, with a copy for the record (which is a part of the official minutes and attached to the master copy). Mr. Anderson read the letter which cited violations by Mr. Rolsky that were called to his attention. Mr. Anderson said that immediate compliance and corrections are to be made to the property. Mr. Anderson said he will meet with Mr. Rolsky to work out these points of violation. Mr. York stated that the remonstrators will have to go to the Circuit Court regarding the notice error for the January BZA Public Hearing. 2g. Rules and Procedures The Board members are to review the 1958 rules and those of 1977 and determine some standards. The Board will meet next month at 7:00 P.M. and no Public Hearings are to be scheduled until 7 :45 P.M. in order that the rules and procedures can be reviewed. There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting adjourned. President Secretary Conn, Angelina V From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Categories: Mr. Colombo, Hollibaugh, Mike P Thursday, June 10, 2010 6:31 PM 'Colombo, D.' Holmes, Christine B RE: Dear Neighbor video link Follow up Flagged Important I was not able to view the video link from my work pc, however, the City does not allow employees to access most social media from our work computers... I'll try from my home computer, and will follow -up to let you know if it worked ok. For your records, Christine Barton Holmes will be inspecting the ProCare site and working on the review of the file. She can be reached by calling 571 2417, or her email address is attached to this note. Mike H. From: Colombo, D. Jmailto:colombo d@vahoo.coml Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 10:45 PM To: Hollibaugh, Mike P Subject: Re: Dear Neighbor video link Dear Mr. Hollibaugh, Thank you very much for the e-mail and I look forward to what you discover. Just curious, were you able to access the video using the link? I would also be happy to meet you or anyone from your staff at my home to discuss potential remedies. Sincerely yours, Dave Colombo From: Hollibaugh, Mice P" <MHollibaugh @carmel.in.gov> To: "Colombo, D." <colombo d @vahoo.com "Brainard, James C" <JBrainard @carmel.in.gov> Sent: Wed, June 9, 2010 6:59:02 PM Subject: RE: Dear Neighbor video link Dear Mr. Colombo. Thanks for your email. While the Procare operation was approved a number of years ago, the City can certainly conduct a review of their operation in relation to what was approved. I will ask my Code staff to dig into it and follow -up soon to let you know what we find. Mike Hollibaugh 1 From: Colombo, D. jmailto:colombo d@vahoo.coml Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 9:55 PM To: Brainard, James C Cc: Hollibaugh, Mike P Subject: Re: Dear Neighbor video link Dear Mr. Mayor and Mr. Hollibaugh, Please let me know if you have difficulty accessing the links below. They are from my Facebook page but unrestricted in terms of access. The video was shot from my back yard a few weeks ago of the equipment operated at ProCare landscaping company on N. Augusta. Can anything be done or am I stuck since they were in operation before our neighborhood was built? This is the owner's claim but I am hopeful in the spirit of Carmel businesses being good neighbors that something can be done to improve the quality of life for those of use close by. I know this would never have happened if we were in Carmel from the get go but sadly we were not well goverened before the annexation. Thanks for all of your help so far, Dave Colombo. http: /www.facebook.com/ video /video.php ?v= 132770003401381 /video /video.php ?v= 132770003401 381 http://www.facebook.com/evideo/video.php?v=132705176741197 Turn mute off to hear sound for full "appreciation" Sincerely yours, Dave Colombo From: "Brainard, James C" <JBrainard @carmel.in.aov> To: "Colombo, D." <colombo d @vahoo.com> Cc: Hollibaugh, Mike P" <MHollibauah @carmel.in.aov> Sent: Mon, June 7, 2010 4:29:17 PM Subject: RE: Dear Neighbor David, Thank you. We do not have `official" code enforcement power until July 27 but I am sending a copy of your note to our code enforcement staff. Perhaps they can talk with the ProCare people now. I understand the frustration you must have at not getting this resolved and we will do our best to help. Feel free to contact me anytime. Jim Brainard 571 -2401 From: Colombo, D. Jmailto:colombo d @vahoo.coml Sent: Monday, June 07 2010 4:28 PM To: Brainard, James C Subject: Dear Neighbor 2 Dear Mr. Mayor, My name is David Colombo and I reside at 10215 Bosloe Dr http: /maps.gooaIe.com /maps ?ie= UTF- 8 &h1=en &tab =w1 I would like to thank you for the recent welcome letter you sent and to express my excitement and anticipation of 'officially' becoming part of the great community of Carmel Indiana One opportunity that I hope this transition provides for me personally is some type of relief /resolution to the situation I experience as a neighbor of the ProCare landscaping business http:// www. procarelandscapers .com /index.asp that admitedly has existed long before our neighborhood was built. While seemingly tolerant 6 -7 years ago, the noise situation has grown increasingly worse. The owner, Lowell Rolsky, and I have failed at attempts to resolve the matter. Unfortunately, another neighbor and I have sadly resorted to calling Hamilton County Sheriff's department when after 8:30 p.m. on a Sunday night the power equipment was still being run. We would like to resolve this amicably. The city of Carmel 's encouragement of this company to be a less conspicuous neighbor would be most welcome. Installing fence, trees, etc. would be appropriate and welcome (and feasible given this IS a landscaping company!). Attached is a photo shot from my back yard. The video clips I have are too large so I will send a link separately. Thanks in advance for your reply and suggestions on how we can resolve this peacefully (pun intended.) Yours truly, David Colombo Conn, Angelina V From: Lux, Pamela K Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 4:03 PM To: Mast, Darren; Holmes, Christine B Subject: RE: Pro Care and Rolskys Should the case be opened under Riedman? Do I mail of copy of the letter to both parties? Thanks -Pam From: Mast, Darren Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 3:41 PM To: Holmes, Christine B Cc: Lux, Pamela K Subject: RE: Pro Care and Rolskys Joseph J. Peggy A. Riedman are the homeowners to the south. I'll bet they have no idea they even own that piece of land. I can do 9:00 in the morning with Colombo. D Darren Mast City of Carmel Department of Community Services Code Enforcement Inspector (317) 571 -2672 A Please consider the environment before printing this e -mail From: Holmes, Christine B Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 3:28 PM To: Mast, Darren Cc: Lux, Pamela K Subject: Pro Care and Rolskys Importance: High Darren, The letter for Pro Care is going out today, citing them for not parking on their site, or at least not providing us with an instrument of record that says they can park there. The question is, should the neighbors to the south get a letter as well, since their property is being illegally parked on? I've combed through all the files, and it doesn't seem as though anyone was /is aware that Pro Care is encroaching. All of their site plans show the lot on their site, but our GIS and County GIS aerials show them encroaching for at least the last ten years. So who's the lucky landowner who gets the citation filed on their property? Thanks! Christine Christine Barton Holmes, LEED AP BD +C Planning Administrator Department of Community Services Conn, Angelina V From: Mast, Darren Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 2:12 PM To: Conn, Angelina V; Hollibaugh, Mike P Subject: RE: 8/19/2010 Letter to Lowell and Laura Rolsky Pro Care I went with Christine on the initial inspection because she thought there were some issues with tires and some property line issues, but I never knew how she handled it from there. Darren Darren Mast City of Carmel Department of Community Services Code Enforcement Inspector (317) 571 -2672 Please consider the et ironinent before printing this e -mail From: Conn, Angelina V Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 1:39 PM To: Hollibaugh, Mike P Cc: Mast, Darren Subject: FW: 8/19/2010 Letter to Lowell and Laura Rolsky Pro Care Hi, Guys, I need help with this since Christine is not here anymore. Were either of you involved with this one? 8/19/2010 Letter to Lowell and Laura Rolsky; regarding the parking spaces on their property 9801 North Augusta Road Carmel, IN From Christine Barton Holmes -Angie From: Adam DeHart f mailto:adehart@keelerwebb.coml Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 11:18 AM To: Conn, Angelina V Subject: RE: 8/19/2010 Letter to Lowell and Laura Rolsky 8/19/2010 Letter to Lowell and Laura Rolsky 9801 North Augusta Road Carmel, IN From Christine Barton Holmes From: Conn, Angelina V fmailto:Aconn@carmel.in.aovl Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 11:10 AM To: Adam DeHart Subject: RE: 8/19/2010 Letter to Lowell and Laura Rolsky Adam Please refresh my memory. What date was the letter written, and did I write it? Conn, Angelina V From: Holmes, Christine B Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 11:07 AM To: 'John Molitor': Hollibaugh, Mike P; Mast, Darren Subject: RE: Pro Care This is their first notification. Darren and I have been following up on complaints from a neighbor about noise, dust, etc, but because their original approvals were essentially blanket approvals with no commitments, and because they seem to be aware of the noise ordinance, this is the only thing we can get them on. Christine Barton Holmes, LEED AP BD +C Planning Administrator Department of Community Services City of Carmel One Civic Square Carmel, Indiana 46032 317.571.2424 317.571.2426 fax carmel.in.gov AP e e cos e t e e v ro r e before printing From: John Molitor fmailto:jmolitor @Drodiay.netj Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 11:07 AM To: Holmes, Christine B; Hollibaugh, Mike P; Mast, Darren Subject: Re: Pro Care The letter looks fine to me. Are they aware that they are in violation, or will this be their first notification? John From: "Holmes, Christine B" <cholmes @carmel.in.gov> To: "Hollibaugh, Mike P" <MHollibaugh @carmel.in.aov "Mast, Darren" <dmast @carmel.in.aov> Cc: John Molitor <jmolitor @prodiay.net> Sent: Thu, August 19, 2010 10:54:57 AM Subject: Pro Care I've drafted a letter for Pro Care, citing them for parking on the required lawn of the site next door, and not having an instrument of record for parking on the adjacent lot. It's a gravel lot, which is also a no -no, but do you think we should get the legality of the lot squared away before they make it permanent? Any suggestions /additions? Thanks! Christine Christine Barton Holmes, LEED AP BD +C Planning Administrator Department of Community Services City of Carmel One Civic Square Carmel, Indiana 46032 Hollibaugh, Mike P From: charlesspray @comcast.net Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2009 9:37 PM To: Hollibaugh, Mike P Subject: North Augusta area I appreciate all of your feedback. Charles Spray Charles Spray MS, LMHC (317) 431 -4598 2/3/2010 rage 1 of 2 Mr. Hollibaugh, My name is Charles Spray and I live on West 97th St, and have for about the past seven years. In those seven years this area has been severely wrecked by a couple of investors who have bought homes either and use them for commercial business, or just let them sit and fall apart. I'm in a situation where I own a nice home, but the area has become very trashy and unsafe, but my options for selling are limited. Right now, I cannot sell my home as a residential property since no decent human being would want to live around here, and I can't sell it commercially either as things have really slowed down in the area the past couple of years. I was wondering if you could give me an idea of what you expect to happen in this area during the next year so that I might have an idea of what I need to do. The information in this e-mail may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual named above. If you, the reader of this message, are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you should not further disseminate, distribute, or forward this material. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify sender immediately at 317 431 -4598 and destroy the original.