HomeMy WebLinkAboutCCPR-11-24-09 (Approved: c 7
CARMEL /CLAY BOARD OF PARKS AND RECREATION
BOARD MEETING MINUTES
Regular Meeting
November 24, 2009, 6:00 P.M.
The Monon Center East
1235 Central Park Drive East
CARMEL, IN 46032
MEMBER ATTENDEES MEMBER ABSENTEES OTHERS
J Engledow T Hackett M Westermeier
J Miller M Klitzing
S Dillon A Kostrzewa
T Tolson D Grisham
J Hagan Hal Espey (Videographer)
P Chester
D Dutcher
J Ketterman
I. ROLL CALL
The regular board meeting of the Carmel /Clay Board of Parks and Recreation was convened at
approximately 6:03 p.m. on November 24, 2009 pursuant to notice. President Jim Engledow asked D
Dutcher to call the roll. Members present other than Mr. Engledow and D Dutcher were J Miller, S Dillon, T
Tolson, J Hagan, P Chester and J Ketterman. T Hackett was absent. Others in attendance are noted
above.
II. CALL TO ORDER And PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Having confirmed the presence of a quorum and after the Pledge of Allegiance, President Engledow called
the meeting to order.
NOTE: Hereinafter these minutes will state the motion, followed parenthetically by the name of the one who
made the motion (listed first) and then the one who seconded it. For example the motion would read, "It was
moved to approve the minutes...etc. (Dutcher, Tolson). "When a motion is carried but not unanimously, the
results of the vote will be listed i.e. "(Dutcher,Tolson; 6 to 2, with one abstaining). When the motion was
carried unanimously, a "C -Un" will be added i.e. "(Dutcher, Tolson; C -Un)."
III. PUBLIC COMMENTS None
IV. PUBLIC PRESENTATION Michael Klitzing
Michael explained the Indiana SCORP requirements by which the creation and adoption of a Park and
Recreation Master Plan can (a) continue to provide a sustainable quality park and recreation system, (b)
respond to trends, (c) establish planning and development guidelines and identify strategies to provide future
services and (d) qualify for grant assistance. He described that in addition to the public presentation, the
Master Plan will be available for public inspection at The Monon Center, The City of Carmel and Clay
Township Offices, the Carmel Clay Public Library and posted on or after December 1, 2009 on the Carmel
Clay Park Department website. He concluded by noting that adoption of a resolution (scheduled to be
introduced for consideration at the December 8, 2009 meeting) will complete the requirements for a 5 year
Master Plan (through 2013).
V. ACTION ITEMS
The Park Board unanimously agreed to add the following Action Items:
Action Item F: Consideration of Amendment to the ProLiance Contract (Dutcher, Tolson, C -Un);
Action Item G: Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement to update the Central Park Master
Plan (Dutcher, Tolson C -Un);
1
A. Minutes Dan Dutcher
1. November 10, 2009 Regular Park Board Meeting Minutes were approved as presented. (Dutcher,
Ketterman C -Un)
B. Financial Reports Judith F. Hagan
1. The Financial Reports were acknowledged as presented. (Hagan, Tolson, C -Un).
C. Claims Judith F. Hagan
1. Claim Sheet November 24, 2009 was approved as presented. (Hagan, Ketterman C -Un.)
2. Clay Township Claim Sheet November 24, 2009 was approved as presented. (Hagan, Ketterman
C -Un.)
D. Consideration of Amendment for Printing, Binding and Mailing Services Mark Westermeier
Mark explained that the vendor who was awarded the Seasonal Recreation Brochure contract requested
permission to mail the brochures from the Indianapolis Post Office where the Vendor has a permit rather
than from the Carmel post office as required in the RFQ and the completed contract. After considering
the request and the related facts, Mark reported that he could foresee no appreciable benefit to requiring
the Carmel Post Office in lieu of the Indianapolis Post Office. The Park Board agreed with Mark's
recommendation and approved the First Amendment to Agreement for Printing, Binding and Mailing
Services with Priority Press, Inc. as presented and authorized the President of the Park Board to
execute the same. (Ketterman, Tolson C -Un.)
E. Consideration of Business Plan Recommendations Mark Westermeier or Michael Klitzing
1. Consideration of cafe space use:
After the motion (to authorize management to identify and engage a design professional to present a
revision plan) was removed from the table to allow consideration by more than a quorum of board
members (Miller, Dutcher C -Un), the following issues were raised and addressed:
Reasons to support converting the cafe space to a fitness use included (a) the ability to
generate revenue, (b) address the community's desire for more fitness classes and (c) the
need to provide space for fitness similar to a small gym;
Reasons to support another attempt to provide a cafe included (a) the position that the cafe
was never intended to be a revenue generator but rather a place for the community to
gather, relax and work and (b) lack of irrefutable evidence that spending design fees and
$200,000 $225,000 to convert the space to fitness is necessary and the cafe space needed.
Many members:
expressed disappointment that the cafe use had not worked and was not projected to work
according to the Business Plan consultant and local experts in the industry;
acknowledged the sentiment of many of the elected officials to follow the Business Plan
recommendation;
acknowledged its commitment to achieve cost recovery expectations and the additional
challenges given the state of the economy;
acknowledged its commitment to provide at The Monon Center, the type of recreation that
meets community needs and provides a positive rather than a negative return on investment;
expressed interest in offering alternatives to a cafe such as vending carts and encouraging
users to utilize and enjoy other passive areas outside the control areas such as the
pedestrian bridge.
After discussion ended, the Park Board authorized management to identify and engage a design
professional to provide a design for board consideration. (Miller, Dutcher: 6 -2 with nays from Dillon
and Tolson.)
F. Consideration of Amendment to the Proliance Contract Deb Grisham
Deb distributed a document entitled "Sales Transaction Confirmation /'Exhibit A (attached as Appendix
A) that Proliance had delivered November 23 to the Department. She explained that without an
objection within 48 hours of receipt, the revised Exhibit would become part of the Natural Gas Sales and
Services Agreement which reflected a pricing program change from Guardian Hybrid to Nymex Close.
Sales Representative Dana Parker Murphy had explained that Proliance discontinued offering the
Guardian Hybrid as a result of customer request for less risky (settles each month) pricing programs in
the current market. The contract terms provide that without a timely objection, the new Exhibit becomes
effective December 1, 2009, the first month that the contract was not locked into the Guardian Hybrid
2
program. Ms. Murphy confirmed that other, more costly programs are available. Mark shared Ms.
Murphy's report that the natural gas purchasing arrangement with Proliance saved the Park Board
approximately $10,000 in 2008 and $5,000 so far in 2009. Deb reported that Ms. Murphy agreed that a
presentation of options to the Park Board at its April 13 meeting would allow plenty of time to determine
whether to continue the contract (which renews annually on August 1st if it is not terminated by either
party with 30 at least days written notice) and with what program. The Park Board accepted the revised
Exhibit as presented and authorized the President to execute it. (Ketterman, Hagan C -Un.)
G. Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement to update the Central Park Master Plan
Mark Westermeier
Mark distributed the proposal received from Gregg Calpino of JJR, attached as Appendix B. He noted
that the proposal is broken out with tasks, time and costs attributed to each with a grand total fee of
$78,500 (plus reimbursables) which would be paid from the Central Park COIT funds. After clarification
that the overflow parking issue was included in this proposal with The Schneider Corporation to be
engaged as a subcontractor, that Gregg Calpino had the time to devote to this project, that the North
Campus is not included and that design consistency would result, the Park Board accepted the proposal
and authorized Management staff and the Park Board attorney to draft and negotiate and the Park Board
President to approve and execute a professional services agreement with JJR. (Dillon, Chester C -Un.)
VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A second December meeting will be necessary to approve claims; an email will be sent out regarding an
alternative date to December 22 "d
Summit is preparing a recommendation regarding the control points code compliance matter.
VII. BOARD COMMENTS
J Engledow commended the assessment process used to interview The Monon Center Division Manager.
VIII. A JO he eeting a ed at approximately 7:30 p.m. (Dillon, Chester C -Un.)
Signature: j i_ Date: (D /Q
Signature: ,v
9 Date: 12, 8
3