Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondenceConn, Angelina V From: Jon Dobosiewicz [jond @NF LAW.COM] Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 11:00 AM To: Mindham, Daren; David Leazenby Cc: Conn, Angelina V; Charlie Frankenberger Subject: RE: Penn Circle landscape plan Daren, The landscape architect has been instructed to make the changes to the plan you have requested in items one and two below. 1. An evergreen species will be substituted in the noted area. 2. The plans will illustrate tree preservation details and the requested chart. We expect to have an updated plan by the end of the day. Please reply to all with your approval of the plan subject to satisfaction of the two final items. Thanks, Jon Jon C. Dobosiewicz Land Use Professional Nelson Frankenberger, PC 3105 East 98th Street, Suite 170 Indianapolis, IN 46280 317 -844 -0106 (Office) 317 -428 -8393 (Cell) 317 -846 -8782 (Fax) ion @nf- Iaw.com NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY This E -mail message and its attachments (if any) are intended solely for the use of the addressee hereof. In addition, this message and the attachments (if any) may contain information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are prohibited from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing, disseminating or otherwise using this transmission. Delivery of this message to any person other than the intended recipient is not intended to waive any right or privilege. If you have received this message in error, please promptly notify the sender by reply E -mail and immediately delete this message from your system. ****M*** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. From: Mindham, Daren mailto :dmindham(acarmel.in.govj Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 9:48 AM To: David Leazenby Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz; Conn, Angelina V Subject: Penn Circle landscape plan 1 David, Two comment and everything else should be approved. 1) Please add a complete screen of evergreen shrubs to the south side of the parking spaces facing the intersection. This will help with limiting headlights hitting the roundabout. Golden Privet will not provide a 12 month screening for vehicle headlights from facing the roundabout. Golden Privet is not an evergreen. I would recommend a juniper species which will provide 12 month screening and will be salt tolerant during the. winter months. 2) Please read comment #1 and the first sentence of comment #2 on the attachment: Will you please add tree preservation details to (L1- 02)•and also include a chart describing the labels for the trees in the Tree Preservation Area with their sizes. Maybe this has been done, but I have not received this updated sheet. When this has been changed, you have my approval on a final landscape plan. Please submit a large format version of sheets C2.0, C2.1, L1 -02 for me to stamp approved for our files, if you would like a stamped large set, please submit two copies and I will get one back to you. Daren Mindham Urban Forester City of Carmel Department of Community Services One Civic Square Carmel, Indiana 46032 Office: 317 -571 -2283 *The true meaning of life is to plant trees, under whose shade you do not expect to sit. Nelson Henderson From: David Leazenby l mailto: david. leazenby @inilhausdevelopment.comi Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 5:39 PM To: Mindham, Daren Cc: Jon C. Dobosi.ewicz (E- mail); Conn, Angelina V Subject: Re: Penn Circle 2 Daren the following are responses to your comments below and correspond to the revised landscape plan (attached): 1. Ok, we have added these. 2. In consultation with our landscape architect, he believes that 6 to 8 trees will be sufficient to divert the views of the garages. We have noted on the landscape plan that we will provide a minimum of three (3) Bald Cypress trees behind each garage structure to help screen the view from Carmel Drive. 3. Ok, done. 4. Ok, see plan and note on bottom right of plan. Please confirm via reply that we have satisfied the Urban Forestry comments at your earliest opportunity. Thank you for your help through the process. Conn, Angelina V From: Mindham, Daren Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 9:25 AM To: 'David Leazenby' Cc: 'Jon C. Dobosiewicz (E- mail)'; Conn, Angelina V Subject: Penn Circle David, in response to the Bufferyard Requirements: When reading the OM District ordinance, our department believes the intent was to have specific landscape provisions of the ordinance w/o the need for additional buffer yard plantings which are not part of the Old Meridian District requirements. Other comments, which some have been mentioned before in a meeting, include: 1) Please add a complete screen of evergreen shrubs to the south side of the parking spaces facing the intersection. This will help with limiting headlights hitting the roundabout. per conditions 2) Please add 10 bald cypress trees north of the parking garages and spaces facing the Meijer pond area. This will buffer the vehicles and garages from view. A more natural broken spacing and location is desired. per conditions 3) Please add 4 -5 street trees to complete the street tree design along Penn. St west of the pond. 4) As for the street trees and the proposed new sidewalk along Carmel Dr If all the street trees along Carmel Dr. will be removed because of sidewalk construction, new street trees (species approved by the Urban Forester) shall be replaced at 40' spacing. These trees may need to be planted on the pond side of the sidewalk if less than a 6' wide area of turf is left between the new sidewalk and the curb. If the sidewalk can be installed without construction limits expanding to within 3 feet of the street trees, preservation of the street trees should be taken. Transplanting ash or other street trees along Carmel Dr is not recommended. It will be cheaper and provide better survivability to simply replant with 2.5" diameter Ball and Burlaped nursery trees. per conditions Daren Mindham Urban Forester City of Carmel Department of Community Services One Civic Square Carmel, Indiana 46032 Office: 317 571 -2283 *The true meaning of life is to plant trees, under whose shade you do not expect to sit. Nelson Henderson From: David Leazenby jmailto: david. leazenby0milhausdevelopment .coml Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 8:54 PM To: Mindham, Daren Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz; Greg Martin Subject: Penn Circle Daren please find attached responses to your comments on Penn Circle landscaping based on our meeting last week. We are working on the changes and will be providing updated plans to to you asap, perhaps even by the time of the meeting tomorrow night. PIease confirm via reply that you are in agreement with the attached document. Thank you for your help. i Conn, Angelina V From: Hollibaugh, Mike P Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2011 6:50 PM To: Mindham, Daren Cc: Conn, Angelina V Subject: RE: comments Daren, Thanks for your email updates. 1 am sorry it took so long to get back with you regarding the Penn Circle buffer yard question. When reading the OM District ordinance, I believe the intent was to have specific landscape provisions of the ordinance w/o the need for additional buffer yard plantings are not part of the Old Meridian District requirements, outlined below: 1. Section 20G.02.02, Development in the District will be governed entirely by the provisions in this Ordinance, except that the provisions of the Subdivision Control Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance and the Sign Ordinance shall apply if specifically referenced, or if this ordinance is silent in applicable areas... then; 2. Section 20G.04.06 C: Parking areas shall be landscaped, as follows: (1) A five -foot (5') wide planting strip shall be provided along the sides and rear of all parking areas. The minimum planting shall include two (2) shade trees and twenty (20) shrubs per 100 linear feet. (2) Parking areas that are located in side yards shall be completely screened from the street right -of -way with a six (6) foot wide planting strip using shrubbery, hedges, shade trees, masonry walls, or combination thereof. (3) Shade trees shall be planted within parking areas greater than 10,000 square feet. There shall be planted one (1).shade tree and five (5) shrubs per every nine (9) spaces. Penn Circle parking areas should have either a 5' strip, when parking area abuts private property or a 6' strip when abutting public r /w. I will follow -up separately to the other items. Mike From: Mindham, Daren Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 9:59 AM To: Hollibaugh, Mike P Subject: comments 1) Would you please email me the comments we had a conversation on Penn Circle about. Noting requirements about the bufferyard or lack thereof. I will add my comments for additional landscaping and email David and Jon. 2) You mentioned our job descriptions in the planners meeting, was there a response to the payroll title changes for Nichole and I? 3) Update: I have a meeting at 9:OOam tomorrow with Dave Huffman about contracts, I will try to get an idea of what they have at least been doing. 4) Update: I will be sending out the advertisement for the intern attached 1 Conn, Angelina V From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Thanks, -Angie Conn, Planning Administrator From: Littlejohn, David W Sent: Friday, February 11, 2011 12:23 PM To: Conn, Angelina V Subject: crosswalk question response Angie, Conn, Angelina V Friday, February 11, 2011 12:32 PM 'brad grabow'; Hagan, Judy; 'Heather Monroe Irizarry'; 'Steve Lawson'; 'Ephraim Wilfong' 'jay@ goweighless.com'; Forwarding E -mail, Dierckman, Leo; 'Susan Westermeier'; 'NKRental @aol.com'; Rider, Kevin D; 'Steve Stromquist' FW: crosswalk question response Good afternoon; Below is the response to the question asked at the Feb. 8 subdivision committee meeting about pedestrian crosswalks requirements. Let me know if you need anything else! I spoke with the Engineering Department about the crosswalk question that was raised at the last PC committee meeting. Gary Duncan said that crosswalk requirements are determined on a case by case basis, but on major thoroughfares they are usually implemented by the City rather than the developer. This is because the crosswalks would be implemented in public right -of -way (ROW) and the City is responsible for what takes place in the ROW. When developments are developed adjacent to existing ROW developers are not typically required to do work within it (as long as it meets City standards). Another factor is that the developer would be responsible for the ROW only on their side of the road to the middle of the ROW. Once the crosswalk crosses the middle of the street that portion of the crosswalk would be their neighbor's responsibility. The development would not be required to construct anything that is not on their property unless there are certain commitments or agreements that require them to do so. Since they would only be able to construct the crosswalk to the middle of the street they may be leading to nothing or a corner with limited pedestrian infrastructure. The City would not want to lead pedestrians to a dead -end and would evaluate the situation to determine the best location for a new crosswalk. It might even be worth saying the City may consider implementing new crosswalks adjacent to a new development after a it is constructed with pedestrian facilities. For example if there is a sidewalk on one side of the street with nothing on the other, the City would not recommend that a crosswalk be implemented at that intersection. After a new development is constructed at that intersection, with pedestrian facilities, a new pedestrian generator or destination would be created and therefore may necessitate the need for a crosswalk. In this case the City would require the developer to construct ADA ramps to the intersection and the city would implement the crosswalk to the other side of the street. When crosswalks are constructed within developments (new streets or in parking lots), the developer is required to construct them. There are many different scenarios that could take place, and there may be instances where developers would be required to implement crosswalks across major thoroughfares. More than likely this would only occur when a development is being constructed on either side of the street. When this occurs the developer would be responsible for both sides of the intersection and it could be reasonable for the city to request that a crosswalk be included with the project to provide pedestrian connectivity to both sides of the development. I hope this helps. Let me know if you need anything else. David Littlejohn, AICP Alternative Transportation Coordinator Department of Community Services City of Carmel One Civic Sq Carmel, IN 46032 (317) 571 -2306 dlittleiohnc5 carmel.in.gov A Please consider the environment before printing this e -mail 2 Conn, Angelina V From: Boone, Rachel M. Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 3:28 PM To: Jon Dobosiewicz; charlie @nf- law.com Cc: Conn, Angelina V; Hollibaugh, Mike P Subject: Penn Circle 5 In Hi Jon, These are the variances needed for Penn Circle signage: 1. Number of signs (3 proposed, 2 allowed) 2. Total square footage (72 proposed, 64 allowed) 3. Two signs facing one ROW (2 proposed, 1 allowed) However, I would like to reiterate that you would not need these variances if you went with one ground sign instead of the third blade sign. This is a unique site where we can take the best of what the Sign Ordinance allows for Use Variance, OM -O, and Multi Tenant Building Complex sites. Not to mention directional signage that is always an option to help give extra identification. The ground sign proposed in the original submittal would work the same as the projecting sign, letting both directions of traffic know where the entrance is. I know you would prefer to have the blade sign. But I would really appreciate it if you could reconsider, go with the ground sign, and not have to apply for any sign variances. Thanks, Rachel 2 a.chel/ 3 oCA,ei Sign Permit Specialist City of Carmel Department of Community Services 3rd Floor One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 317.571.2417 317.571.2426 fax http: /www.ci.carmel.in.us /services /communityservice. html Please consider the environment before printing this e -mail 1 Conn, Angelina V From: Littlejohn, David W Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 10:30 AM To: 'David Leazenby`; Conn, Angelina V Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz; Greg Martin Subject: RE: Bike Racks David, Thank you for providing the bicycle parking information for my review. Based on our discussion and the details you provided it appears that you will meet the bicycle parking requirements for this project. If you need anything else or have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, David Littlejohn, AICP Alternative Transportation Coordinator Department of Community Services City of Carmel One Civic Sq Carmel, IN 46032 (317) 571 -2306 A Please consider the envirotnnent before printing this e -mail From: David Leazenby mail to: david. leazenby @milhausdevelopment.coml Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 1:03 PM To: Littlejohn, David W Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz; Greg Martin Subject: Bike Racks 1 David here is an exhibit showing our bike rooms in Buildings 1, 2 and 4. Each room holds 16 bikes for a total of 48. We also have 2 racks by the leasing office and two racks by the pool for a total of 8 surface bike spaces. This yields 56 spaces of the total required by the ordinance of 63. We will have at least 7 more spaces provided in one or both of two places: 1. We are still planning the amenity space of the 4- story building on the first floor (Building 3). We intend to have a similar bike room in this building that would hold 7 -16 bikes. It's location and configuration is not yet finalized. 2. If, for some reason, we cannot accommodate a minimum of 7 spaces inside Building 3, then we will add 4 more bike exterior bike racks (for 8 spaces) around Building 3. Conn, Angelina V From: Mindham, Daren Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 2:51 PM To: 'David Leazenby' Cc: Conn, Angelina V Subject: Penn Circle Attachments: bufferyard.pdf David, The following email represents comments for this project specifically addressing the area of urban forestry. I have reviewed the drawings and offer the following comments: URBAN FORESTRY REVIEW COMMENTS 1. Will you please add tree preservation details showing the general basics like preservation fencing outside the drip line of the trees. I would like to have side notes recommending that the fencing group existing trees and that the fencing should be as far outside from the drip line as construction allows. Also that, the tree preservation area should have the existing grade preserved; that the area shall not be filled or excavated. 2. Please, show the location, size and species of the existing trees to be preserved on the plan. With that, please note in the responding email how many trees are in the 5' bufferyard on the north perimeter and how many will be saved. This count saved will need an additional 2 trees in the total count to satisfy the two other bufferyards as we have talked about earlier. 3. There are no plans about removing all of the existing mature trees on the Meijer Property, I would like to focus on saving all the trees possible, especially in the NE corner on your property and the Meijer property. This may need further discussion. 4. With the addition of a new sidewalk /path along Carmel Dr. The existing street trees may be effected. This will be something to determine later. 5. After reviewing the required bufferyard landscaping per 26.04.06.c (see attachment), there is a shortfall on material. I have used the other required landscaping towards this overall count. I have some locations I would like to see planted with this landscaping. We can meet or maybe a phone call would suffice, please let me know. But in general, I would like to have this material planted in these locations: street trees lining Carmel Dr.(in coordination with a new sidewalk trees and shrubs lining the south side of the parking north of the open lawn area on the south end of the property, possibly trees lining the south side of the detention pond (bald cypress on the pond edge would be a unique design), a few ornamentals could go in the south lawn area (future plans of development here right and the continuation of street trees along Penn east of the pond. 6. As I have mentioned Japanese Tree Lilac might be a better choice for around the pool, serviceberry's tend to have bad root suckering. 7. As mentioned before, the 6' wide mulch path goes right into the tree and the street tree in the NE corner will need to be removed. 8. Realistically, the trees in the parking lot islands need more soil volume. As Jon, mentioned he would like to have things work and do what's best, I am fine with having only 3 trees in the middle island instead of 4 and, if possible, eliminating a parking stall on each side to spread that width on both ends for better root space would be great. If left as is, these trees will never see 20 years and will likely never reach 30' while looking sickly and 1 Sincerely, never reaching potential. I really like what you did with the other parking lot island with the width. I remember you mentioning that the one guy said that a 5' width would be sufficient, as this is true to install the tree it is not actually true if you want the tree to do well and grow. The 5' minimum is a standard because the initial root ball is 36" plus a foot on each side for digging /auguring is needed for initial planting, not future growth. 9. Along with the parking islands and other parking ends that have trees, turf is a competitor with tree roots. I would rather have the island ends capped with mulch and remove the turf. It is also higher maintenance to run a mower out there every week for just a stamp of grass. 10. I did not see any utility plans shown, locations may need to be eventually adjusted when utilities are better determined. Please illustrate how these comments will be addressed by letter or revised plan. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thanks. Daren Mindham Urban Forester City of Carmel Department of Community Services One Civic Square Carmel, Indiana 46032 Office: 317 571 -2283 *The true meaning of life is to plant trees, under whose shade you do not expect to sit. Nelson Henderson 2 Conn, Angelina V From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Good afternoon, Jon at yesterday's meeting we discussed several aspects of the Penn Circle project, and below is a 'punch list' of items the Department would like addressed before the Feb. 1 plan commission committee meeting: 1. Attached are the building elevations scanned with review comments /suggestions written on them. Please address. 2. Where are the electric and gas meter locations? We cannot see them shown /labeled on the small plans in the packet. 3. On the site plan, the parking chart is confusing. The OM /Office parking ratios are required, while the multiple family- dwelling parking ratios are per the parking ordinance. Different numbers are shown, where only one should be shown. 4. It almost seems like too much building /pavement on site. Can you go to all 4 story buildings, so that a few building footprints can be removed and open up space for landscaping, parking and sidewalks? 5. The Planning Dept. needs details on the balcony railing systems and how the underside of the balconies are finished out. 6. The Planning Dept. needs details on the window openings will there be trim molding or brick detailing around then? Thank you, Angie Conn, Planning Administrator City of Carmel Planning Zoning Division Dept. of Community Services 1 Civic Square, 3rd Flr. Carmel, IN 46032 Please consider the environment before printing this e -mail Conn, Angelina V Thursday, January 27, 2011 1:52 PM 'Jon Dobosiewicz' 'David Leazenby'; Hollibaugh, Mike P; Donahue -Wold, Alexia K Penn Circle project, review comments continued. Penn Cir Bldgs Review Comments.pdf 0: 317- 571 -2417 I F: 317- 571 -2426 I E: aconn @carmel.in.gov W: www.carmel.in.gov /services /DOCS /DOCSDOPZ.htm 1 Conn, Angelina V From: Mindham, Daren Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 4:35 PM To: 'David Leazenby' Cc: Conn, Angelina V Subject: Penn Circle David, After receiving comments from the rest of the department staff, I would like to clear up any communication that we have had over the last few days. For my review, I will be requiring a 5' bufferyard along the northern perimeter of the property. This is based on the consideration that the perimeter (of the property, not the project) is designated as a sideyard and that the use is multi family development in reference to the table on 26.04.06.c. I believe that you mentioned that you were adjusting the building setbacks to provide this requirement. Furthermore, the tree preservation that is required will still need to be addressed. I believe that you were adjusting the plans to preserve the trees in the northeast corner. If the total required number is not feasible, a common ground can be made to fulfill this requirement. I think that these comments should clear up the major concerns you may have. I will review the latest landscape plan (unless you will have a newer plan ready) for more in depth comments. Namely, the addition of tree preservation details and labeling of the trees to save in the NE corner and additional review of the inner landscaping designs. Thank you for your attention to these matters. I will be emailing further review comments shortly. Daren Mindham Urban Forester City of Carmel Department of Community Services One Civic Square Carmel, Indiana 46032 Office: 317 -571 -2283 *The true meaning of life is to plant trees, under whose shade you do not expect to sit. 'Nelson Henderson 1 02-Pit N storefrei i W CARMEL PLAN COMMISSION SPECIAL STUDIES COMMITTEE DEPARTMENT REPORT February 1, 2011 Docket No. 10120011 ADLS Amend: Penn Circle (former Meridian Pointe site) The applicant seeks site plan and design approval amendments for a 193 -unit multi-family development. The site is located at 12346 Old Meridian St. It is zoned OM /O Old Meridian District, Office. Filed by Charlie Frankenberger of Nelson Frankenberger, on behalf of •G. B. Developers II, LLC. The applicant proposes to amend several aspects of a previously approved ADLS (architecture, design, lighting, landscaping, and signage) Application for the Meridian Pointe project, which was approved in 2010, for 174 dwelling units. (The Development Plan (DP) Amendment petition for this item will appear on the Feb. 15 Plan Commission meeting agenda, under Public Hearings.) A few major differences are that most of the buildings proposed are 3- stories tall, rather than 4 stories, and additional buildings and garages are placed on the site. The building facades are comprised mostly of brick, smooth hardi -panel (cement fiber), and glass. Please view the petitioner's information packet for further detail. Regarding signage, the applicant seeks approval for three blade signs and three awning signs. Only two blade signs are allowed. A variance would be required for the third blade sign. The awning signs fit within the "leftover" allowable wall (blade) sign square footage. The blade sign is 19.5 sq. ft. and will have a black background with push through lettering that will shine silver, green and white. The design is simple and elegant. It will look nice on the buildings. The awning signs will be pin- mounted stainless steel letters. They are each 4.5 sq. ft. Petitioner, please.confirm whether or not these signs will be illuminated by external lights. There are other directional a address signs located throughout the site, which all meet the Sign Ordinance requirements. Staffs outstanding comments for the petitioner: 1 x Please ptouidc exl bits of pr viously oseF veyor s Office comment 1talTirtton t ounty' mop. g e mc nt_lssuf bWritand 1ISC(O e hom site cTnahea omanout t) tiee toi thetri of at 1eni. many concern namel his area. Us"eaof theu`M f1un11)ei. 0 I:p(gt uite'windc rere rtes 9Pltton me liist flair Units tobec ame c n ceders "I rieant cnn annt tsee?themon tYte siriall;t�l:ans iii. 25 o naior s •R c u 3. c\ filgii i ationsare: eng ineerm 6 tared; v�7hlc ;the #MFciwel Recommendation: After all comments /concerns are addressed, the Dept of Community Services (DOCS) recommends that the Committee approves this item. Qr tables tt toathe Mar l ,committee�meetin Conn, Angelina V From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Mr. Ellison, Richard Hoover [rhoover @civilsitepc.com] Wednesday, January 26, 2011 12:13 PM Ellison, Christopher M 'Greg Martin'; 'Buzz Weisiger'; cwcbuzz @aol.com; 'David Leazenby'; 'David M. Griffee, PE'; Conn, Angelina V Penn Circle Utility Plan 10 -137 Penn Circle C5.0.pdf Attached, please find the most current utility plan showing the locations of the proposed water /fire main and proposed fire hydrants. I apologize for not getting this information to you sooner; we are in the process of revising plans per TAC comments. T have the vehicle for the turning movements and will forward a plan showing the movements through the site to you tomorrow. If you have any questions, please contact me at your earliest convenience. Thanks, Dik Dik Hoover Civil Site Solutions, P.C. 11925 East 65th Street, Suite 9 Indianapolis, Indiana 46236 Cell: 317 -441 -8682 Fax: 317 947 -0532 1 Conn, Angelina V From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Angie, Be advised on 1/13/11 I requested information from the developer on the Proposed Penn Circle project at N. Pennsylvania and Old Meridian St. I also requested an update from the representatives for the project during last weeks TAC meeting and they said I would receive the requested information this week. As of this morning I still have not been contacted or received any correspondence. I wanted to keep you informed. Thanks, Lt. Chris Ellison Deputy Fire Marshal Carmel Fire Dept. 317- 571 -2621 From: Ellison, Christopher M Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 1:30 PM To: 'David M. Griffee' Subject: Penn Circle David, I have received your plans on the proposed Penn Circle project. If possible could you please provide the following information: 1. Fire Hydrant locations for the development. 2. Construction type and square footage and number of stories for each building. 3. Will each building be protected by automatic fire alarm and fire sprinkler systems? I have attached Turing radius information for our largest fire apparatus. If possible please provide a drawing showing this apparatus plotted out through the development to confirm that we can travel through. Respectfully, Lt. Chris Ellison Deputy Fire Marshal Carmel Fire Dept. 317- 571 -2621 Ellison, Christopher M Wednesday, January 26, 2011 8:09 AM Conn, Angelina V Ellison, Christopher M FW: Penn Circle Turning Radius L- 41.jpg 1 JAMES J. NELSON CHARLES D. FRANKENBERGER JAMES E. SHINAVER LAWRENCE J. KEMPER JOHN B. FLATT FREDRIC LAWRENCE JAMES A. NICKLOY CHRISTOPHER A. FERGUSON Angie Conn City of Carmel One Civic Square Cannel, IN 46032 Dear Angie: Received 1/13/11 NELSON FRANKENBERGER A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3105 EAST 98TH STREET, SUITE 170 INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46280 PHONE: 317- 844 -0106 FACSIMILE: 317 -846 -8782 January 24, 2011 Re: Penn Circle.— 12346 Old Meridian Street Docket No. 10120011 ADLS Amend JANE B. MERRILL, Of Counsel JON C. DOBOSIEWICZ, Land Use Professional Below you will find responses to the comments received to date regarding the Alternative Transportation Review and Comments (January 13), Overall comments from Rachel Boone (January 13), and Preliminary Planning Zoning Dept. review comments (January 5). Alternative Transportation Review and Comments 1) The Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan requires the construction of a 10' asphalt path along Pennsylvania St and an enhanced sidewalk along Old Meridian. Please revise the plans to include and label these facilities. We have modified this as requested. See plans submitted on 1/21/11. 2) The City of Carmel•Parking Ordinance requires all multifamily residence developments include bicycle parking at a rate of one (1) bicycle parking space for every three (3) dwelling units. Please see the City of Carmel's Parking Ordinance in order to determine appropriate locations and construction details for the required bicycle parking for the apartments and the office building. We included bicycle parking as required. See plans submitted on 1/21/11. Please consider providing including long term covered bicycling parking for the apartments. If this is already in consideration please provide details on how this will be provided. (04 33 We have bicycle parking spaces provide within the buildings as well as on the site. For details, see plans submitted on 1/21/11. 4) Please connect all internal sidewalks to each other, provide a sidewalk on both sides of the parking lot entrance on Old Meridian, and provide sidewalk connections to the garages. Please revise the plans to reflect these changes. We have modified this as requested. See plans submitted on 1/21/11. 5) Please indicate ADA compliant handicap ramps at all crossings. We have modified this as requested. See plans submitted on 1/21/11. Received 1/13/11 Overall: 1. Not a fan of the proposed building colors..dark brown, light brown, and yellow? Colors are selected to match previously approved plans. Those shown in the TAC submittal may not have been printed well. See revised elevations submitted 1/21/11. 2. I know it's cheaper but why do they want to put the lap board siding on the backs of the building? It doesn't look great. There is no longer any hardi -board on the elevations. We have changed it to hardi- panel to complement the more contemporary architecture of the buildings. 3. These buildings just don't look as nice as what Meridian Pointe presented. (Many of the planners agree with this one.) See revised elevations submitted 1/21/11. 4. For landscaping around the pool I don't know what they've chosen, but i do hope there are some tall evergreens proposed. It's always nice when there's some privacy around apartment pools. See landscape plan submitted 1/21/11. We have substantial landscaping, shrubs and other trees that will work to "enclose" visually this courtyard space. We do not prefer to use "evergreen" specifically. We alsaplan to have cabanas for resident use on the pool deck for sunbathing privacy. Signage: 1. They have proposed 2 projecting ID signs, 1 wall sign and 2 ground signs. Only 2 signs are allowed. However, we could consider this a complex and allow them a complex directory sign. See revised signage package submitted on 1/21/11. We have 3 vertical projecting signs, and 3 awning signs. 2. They'll need variances to have, all 5 ID signs. The Dept. probably won't support those variances because all the signs are not necessary. Different combos could be used to provide adequate identification. See response to #1. 3. I like the projecting sign and ground sign designs. I think the best option is to utilize the 2 ground signs, but move them to the main entrances. The entrance on the NW side of the site could have a small directional sign to identify that entrance. See response-to #1. *-1 The stop sign and street sign combo: Should we require them to use the fancy street sign names like the rest of Old Meridian has recently converted to? I think it would be more appropriate for the area. We are open to suggestions here, however we do plan a more contemporary design rather than traditional like Providence or Alexandria. Our signs should complement our architecture. 5. Am ok with all the speed limit, future resident, etc. signs. Might need to add /see a small, 3 sq. ft. or less and 3' tall or less directional sign for entrances not identified by a monument sign. See response to #1. di- I Address sign sizes and locations are ok. These locations have generally remained the same, however we plan to install them differently. See updated sign package submitted 1/21/11/ The proposed construction sign size is fine. However would like to see the design /picture of the proposed site instead of just the name. (Especially because the leasing signs will look exactly the same with just a different size.) We will also need more specifics on actual contractor info on the sign before issuing the sign permit. I cannot allow this sign to go up until plans have been approved and construction has begun. Only 2 signs are allowed one to each street frontage. (They have proposed 3.) Ok. We are working on a rendering that would be included on this sign. t'8 'For Lease' signs fit the size requirements. They have proposed 1, and 2 are allowed. Not sure which sign is referred to here as "For Lease" sign? Is this the marketing sign shown as 4'x5'? If so, we will locate an additional sign. 9.' Again, my preference is for the ground signs, not the projecting signs. If we considered one of the _round sins as a dire_ ctory sign, they could also have the wall sign above the leasing office entrance. I am ok with this. See response o 017( Ground signs are not shown on site plan or landscaping plans.. The Ground Signs have been removed. Received 1/5/11 Preliminary Planning /Zoning Dept. review comments: 1. Compare and contrast the Meridian Pointe elevations and plans to the Penn Circle elevations and plans, so the committee can easily see what is changing or remaining the same. The elevations of Penn Circle and Meridian Pointe are substantially similar. The materials and colors are identical. They both have flat roofs. The "verticality" of the architecture is evident in both. They both include awnings, canopies, and balconies in substantially similar configurations. The facades of both building design also have similar offsets. The dam differences in the elevations are largely driven by the difference in the development program itself. First, the Meridian Pointe building was designed with 4 stories, an average square foot per unit of 1,050; 174 units; and parked at a ratio of 1.7 spaces per unit. Penn Circle is designed as a mix of 3 and 4 stories; an average square footage of 800; thus more units at 193; but still a parking ratio of 1.7. Also, regarding the elevations, the Meridian Pointe windows were represented as commercial- grade, office- building windows, which are cost prohibitive on a residential building. The Penn Circle elevations accurately depict the appropriate windows to be built while taking care to create a substantially similar elevation as Meridian Pointe. Please provide copies of your correspondence with the TAC members and their correspondence with you. Ok. Feel free to bring color and material samples to the Plan Commission meeting. Ok. Provide the site plan overlaid on an aerial photograph of immediate area. Ok. See plans submitted on 1/21/11. Please provide digital files of the final approved plans and elevations, in addition to paper copies. Ok. See plans submitted on 1/21/11. (4 Please label the total number of apartment units on the site plan. Ok. See plans submitted on 1/21/11. Building entrances shall be defined and articulated by architectural elements such as lintels, pediments, pilasters, columns, and other design elements appropriate to the architectural style and details of the building as a whole. Ok. See plans submitted on 1/21/11. We have updated the elevations and have included limited amounts of articulation around the entrances, corners and other important viewpoints of the site. We have also included raised facades in places along the roofs, awnings and canopies to accent the elevations. The Penn Circle architectural style is to be contemporary, associated with lighter architectural expression clean lines. We believe any additional lintels, pediments, pilasters, columns will conflict with this intent. Need vinyl window details: All window design shall be compatible with the style, materials, color, details and proportion of the building. The number of panes, the way it opens, the trim around it and whether it is embellished with shutters must be consistent with the architectural style of the structure. Ok. See plans submitted on 1/21/11. Swet( p-Act 2 s I elk) ccicik) d Ok. See plans submitted on 1/21/11. The configuration of the first floor units and their proximity to the on street parking on Old Meridian will allow this flexibility. Does the trash area accommodate recycling per zoning ordinance section 20G.04.07.C(1)? Any Accessory Building for storage or disposal of refuse shall accommodate waste and recyclable materials, and, if applicable, grease or other cooking refuse. o'y-A. Future Development 'outlot': please plant trees around the outlot, add a temporary mulch path through, etc., similar to what Meridian Pointe was going to do for temporary aesthetics. Ok. See plans submitted on 1/21/11. Street lighting shall be provided as part of all projects, on both sides of the street when possible, and spaced no less than one hundred (100) feet apart, and of a design per the adopted City style. cot; If possible, provide color photo examples of similar apartment communities or submit the 3D perspective renderings as shown in a pre submittal meeting. (The color building elevations do not show much detail.) Ok. See plans submitted on 1/21/11. Can brick be used on the first floors of the building exterior, instead of brick veneer? Ok. See plans submitted on 1/21/11. On building type 3, please add four windows total on the middle portion of the building? (two small ones on each side 2 x 2) Ok. See plans submitted on 1/21/11. Suggestion: could your client design some of the units on the first floor of the buildings facing Old Meridian St. to be able to be converted into office (and a little retail) at a later date? (Like at Legacy Towns Flats.) (it-P VI&QCZl/t. 444 1 Ook u.)14-4,-) S`)'e.- Yes. See plans submitted on 1/21/11. Ground level mechanical /telecommunication equipment shall be screened from Old Meridian Street using walls, fencing, landscaping, or other method approved by the Commission. Please label the mechanical equipment locations on the site plan and provide details on how they are screened from view. This includes electric and gas meters. Ok. See plans submitted on 1/21/11. Please label the garage door materials. Ok. See plans submitted on 1/21/11. Ok. See plans submitted on 1/21/11. Please make sure that all exterior light fixtures have flat lenses and 90- degree cut offs. Ok. See plans submitted on 1/21/11. Lv- 0 CYr N,5 j at A ox Ok. 29 E. M- Office On the site plan, show the parking space calculations required, using the subarea requirements, as well as the Dwelling, multifamily requirements in Ch. 27. v S Ok. See plans submitted on 1/21/11. Label the building setbacks from the road right of way. (Front building setbacks must be at least 15.75 -ft per the variance granted in 2009.) Ok. See plans submitted on 1/21/11. 21) Label the road rights of way boundaries, per the Thoroughfare Plan Map within the Comprehensive Plan. S '1 kg-ad 4j \Cu_lq.0 Pen if r a1 Ok. See plans submitted on 1/21/11. Please consider using LEED or `green' building practices, such as a white roof, solar panels, pervious pavers in all or part of the parking area, bioswales, etc. Ok. We will install white roofs. We are also considering pervious pavers in the parking spaces subject to our drainage calculations and ultimate drainage plan with the pond to the north. Rain gardens are also shown in the parking area. Please verify with the City Engineering Dept. that the curb cut locations are satisfactory. Prepare an estimated construction cost to comply with the Thoroughfare Plan Alternative Transportation Plan; contact the Engineering Dept. for more details. Gary Duncan can be contacted at 317 -571 -2441 orgduncan@carmel.in.gov. Ok. O'2,( Walkways for buildings fronting on Old Meridian Street shall occur at intervals no Tess than one hundred fifty (150) feet. Ok. See plans submitted on 1/21/11. There are a couple of areas that need better sidewalk connectivity; please work with David Littlejohn, Alternative Transportation Systems Coordinator, on this. Ok. We have also responded to his comments received 1/13/11. Extend sidewalk connection to go from northeast corner of site to parking area, along the north area of the easternmost building. Ok. See plans submitted on 1/21/11. Please work with David Littlejohn, Alternative Transportation Systems Coordinator, on what paths, bike lanes, and sidewalks are required for this site. His contact info is 317 -571- 2417 and dlittlejohn @carmel.in.gov Ok. We have also responded to his comments received 1/13/11. Please show /label the bicycle parking area and provide the bike rack details, per chapter 27.06 of the ordinance. Ok. See plans submitted on 1/21/11. Please label the percent of the site's impervious surface. Rachel Boone, Sign Permits Officer, will soon issue review comments on the signage package possible variances needed. Her contact info is 317 571 -2417 and rboonePcarmel.in.gov. Ok. We have also responded to her comments received 1/13/11. Note: most likely, the Subdivision Committee will review this item and then forward it to the full Plan Commission to get feedback from all plan commission members. Ok. Should you have any questions regarding this, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, NELSON FRANKENBERGER, P.C. effoAdowskg Jon C. Dobosiewicz Land Use Professional JAMES J. NELSON CHARLES D. FRANKENBERGER JAMES E. SHINAVER LAWRENCE J. KEMPER JOHN B. FLATT FREDRIC LAWRENCE JAMES A. NICKLOY CHRISTOPHER A. FERGUSON Angie Conn City of Carmel One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 Dear Angie: Enclosures NELSON FRANKENBERGER A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3105 EAST 98TH STREET, SUITE 170 INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46280 PHONE: 317- 844 -0106 FACSIMILE: 317- 846 -8782 January 21, 2011 Re: Penn Circle 12346 Old Meridian Street Docket No. 10120011 ADLS Amend JANE B. MERRILL, Of Counsel Enclosed you will find 8 copies of the informational brochure for the above referenced item to be heard by the Committee on February 1, 2011. Should you have any questions regarding this, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, NELSON FRANKENBERGER, P.C. Jon C. Dobosiewicz Land Use Professional JON C. DOBOSIEWICZ, Land Use Professional January 20, 2011 RE: Penn Circle Dear Mr. Griffee Civil Site Solutions, PC ATTN: David Griffee, PE 337 Main Street, Suite B Beech Grove, Indiana 46107 VIA E -MAIL: dgriffee a?civilsitepc.com Xenton C. `Ward, CrF.7V1 Surveyor of Jfamilton County 'Phone (317) 776-3495 Fax (317) 776 -9623 Suite z SS One J familton County Square Noblesville, lnriianu 46060 -2230 We have reviewed the construction plans submitted to the Hamilton County Surveyor's Office on December 20, 2010, for this project and have the following comments: 1. The proposed project falls in the incorporated area and MS4 jurisdiction of the City of Carmel. 2. The proposed project DOES NOT fall in a City of Carmel Wellhead Protection Zone. 3. The proposed project falls in the W.R. Fertig Regulated Watershed. This watershed has an allowable release rate of 0.25 cfs per acre, with the overall general release rate of 0.1 cfs per acre for the 10 year, 24 hour storm event and small also applied. 4. Please submit an outlet permit for the direct discharge to the W.R. .Fertig Regulated Drain. The application is available on our website at http /www.hamiltoncounty.in.gov /surveyor, under the Forms page. 5. The maximum allowable discharge for the 100 year 24 hour storm event for the reworked detention basin will be acreage of project, plus acreage of required road detention, at 0.25 cfs per acre, plus the actual discharge of 100.4 cfs from the Meijer Basin #3 per the Meijer Drainage Report, unless downstream restrictions further reduce the allowable discharge. 6. The proposed plan appears to be modifying the Meijer Extension Arm of the W.R. Fertig Regulated Drain. This will require a reconstruction petition, bonding, public hearing with the Hamilton County Drainage Board, and as- builts drawings. Once other comments are addressed and the plan is near final, we can discuss the final detailed requirements and time lines. Sincerely, 7. Since the proposed detention basin in not located on the parcel being developed and the parcel being developed in not part of the master drainage plan,'a detailed agreement with the property owner of the basin will need to be completed. This agreement will need to include permission and right of entry and it is suggested that items like liability, water quality maintenance, and overall maintenance cost are also included. 8. Per section 302.02 of the Hamilton County Stormwater Management Technical Standard Manual (HCSMTSM), the downstream storm sewer system needs,to be analyzed to confirm capacity of the reworked detention basin. This analysis need to extend to the big lake in Carmel Science and Technology Park, which is through the Meijer Arm, Old Meridian relocations, Lunsford Relocation, and Carmel Science and Technology Arm to the W.R. Fertig Drain to Str. 504. 9. Please address all comments of the Crossroad Engineers January 19 2011 comment letter, as many of these are the same comments I have also. 10. Please note the additional comments may be warranted at a later date. Should you have any questions, I can be reached at 317 -776 -8495. Greg Hoyes, AC, CFM, CPESC Plan Reviewer CC: Angie Conn Carmel DOCS John Thomas Carmel Engineering Dave Barnes Carmel Engineering Greg Ilko Crossroad Engineers Jon Dobosiewicz Nelson and Frankenberger Date: Place: Time: Indianapolis Water Review Comments from Duane Whiting 01 11 2011 9:00 a.m. Docket No. 10120002 PP Amend: Replat of North Augusta, lots 20 29A The applicant seeks primary plat amendment approval to create 5 lots from 2, on 3.14 acres. The sites are located at 3802 W 96`x' St. and 9640 N. Augusta Dr. They are zoned B -5 and 8 -7/ Business, both within the US 421 Michigan Rd. Overlay Zone. Filed by William Niernier for Sand Capital 1X, LLC. 9:1.5. a.m. Docket No. 10120008 Z: The Bridges'PUM The applicant seeks approval to rezone 63.7 acres from S -2 /Residence to PUD /Planned Unit Development. The site is located at 11405 Spring Mill Rd., at the southeast corner of 116 St. and Spring Mill Rd. Filed by Charlie Frankenberger of Nelson Frankenberger, on behalf of G, B. Developers 11, LLC. 9:30 a.m. Docket No 10120011 ADLS Amend: Penn Circle (former Meridian Pointe site) The applicant seeks site plan and design approval amendments for a 173 -unit multi- family development. The site is located at 12346 Old Meridian St. It is zoned OM /O Old Meridian District, Office. Filed. by Charlie Frankenberger ofNelson Frankenberger on behalf of G. B. Developers I1 LLC. ONE CIVIC SQ. CARMEL TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Dept. of Community Services Conference Room, 3` Floor, Cannel City Hall. 9:00 a.m. Veolia Water Indianapolis (VWI) is the contract operator for the Indianapolis Water (IW) utility. And as such has reviewed the three petitions as stated in the above referenced TAC Agenda Topics, IW's response to each petition is as follows: Docket No. 10120002 PP Amend: Replat of North Augusta, lots 20 29A No Objection to the Replat Amendment Note: the property addressed as 3802 W. 96 St. has available water service from an existing IW water main in W. 96 St., however will eventually be transitioned to Carmel Utilities. See attached MapGuide drawing. Docket No. 10120008 Z: The Bridges PUD No Objection to the -PU ©!Planned Unit Development Note: the property addressed as 11405 Spring Mill Rd. has available water service from an existing IW water main in Spring Mil( Rd. and 111 St:, however will eventually be transitioned to Carmel Utilities. See attached MapGuide drawing. Docket No. 10120011 ADLS Amend: Penn Circle (former Meridian Pointe site) No Objection for site plan and design approval amendments for the development Note' the property addressed as 12346 Old Meridian St. has available water service from an existing 1VV water mains in Old Meridian St. and Pennsylvania St, however will eventually be transitioned to Carmel Utilities. See attached MapGuide drawing. File: TAC20I 1- 0119.doc Page 1 of 1 CARMEL. IN 46032 (317) 571-2417 January 18, 2011 Mr. David M. Griffee, P.E. Civil Site Solutions, PC 11925 East 65 Street, Suite 9 Indianapolis, IN 46236 ,JAMES BRAINARD, MAYOR RE: Penn Circle- Project Review #1 Dear Mr.. Griffee: The City received your construction plans on December 20, 2010. The project is scheduled for review at the January 19, 2011 Technical Advisory Committee meeting. We offer the following comments: GENERAL INFORMATION 1. These comments represent the Department of Engineering's first review of the preliminary development plans for this project. 2. We request that all responses to our comments be provided in writing and be accompanied by a drawing reflecting the requested revisions. Failure to provide written responses may result in the delay of the review process. 3. It is critical that this office be made aware of all modifications made on the plans being re- submitted, particularly if any'such changes are considered "new" or fall outside of our previous reviews, Please provide revised plans including all revisions. Please notify us of any changes and specifically state any changes, including changes resulting from Plan Commission, BZA or other committee meetings. 4. We have engaged Crossroad Engineers, PC to review all drainage plans and drainage calculations submitted to this office for review. If you have not already done so, please provide a set of drainage plans and calculations to their office for review. We will share Crossroad's comments as they are received. 5. Final drawings will not be approved for construction until: a. All Engineering Department and Utility Department and Hamilton County Surveyor issues have been resolved. b. All bonds and performance guarantees are posted. c, All Board of Public Works and Safety approvals and any other governing agency approvals (if required) are obtained. d. All off -site easements necessary to install utilities to serve the development are secured. e. SWPPP is approved. f. All fees are paid. 6. The Department reserves the right to provide additional comments based upon subsequent reviews. 7. An approved Storm Water Management Pennit is required prior to commencing any earth disturbing activity. Please contact Mr. John Thomas regarding storm water quality requirements. An approved right -of -way pennit is required prior to commencing any work in the public right -of -way. 9. If it will be necessary to relocate existing utilities, the costs for such relocation shall be borne solely by the developer: Any utility poles requiring relocation shall be relocated to within one-foot of the outside edge of the proposed right -of -way. 10. The Departnent requires that the construction drawings' be developed in accordance with the City of Carmel digital submission standards and that all required submittals for primary plat, DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING OZI: Civic.SQUARr. CARMEL. IN 46032 Ori•ic:l: 3.17,571,2441 FAX 517,571.2439 EMAIL cngiltcrnii;,g.iarnid.in.gcA Mr. David M. Griffee, P.E. January 18, 2011 RE: Penn Circle Project Review #1 Page 2 of 4 secondary plat, and construction drawings be made. The digital files. must be submitted' to the Department of Engineering priot to the approval of the construction plans. Please contact the City GIS Department for the requirements. 11. Jurisdictions: a. The project site is located within current City of Carmel Corporate Limits. b. Perimeter Street and Right-of-Way City of Carmel (Old Meridian Street, Pennsylvania Street, 126' Street) c. Water City of Carmel Utilities d. Sanitary Sewers City of Cannel Utilities e: Store Sewers /Drainage City of Carmel. E Legal Drains Hamilton County Surveyor's Office. 12: Drawings submitted for approval: a. The design engineer must certify all drawings submitted for final approval: b This office will require 9 sets of drawings for approval after all issues have been. resolved. The drawings will be "stamped as approved and signed by the City Engineer and by Carmel Utilities. The Owner will. receive 3 sets, one of which must be maintained on the construction site at all times: if this project is subject to review and approval by the Hamilton County Surveyor's Office, a total of 11 sets will be required for final approval. 13. Carmel Utilities will provide separate reviews of this project for water issues. Please assure that copies of all drawings are sent to: Pant Pace Paul Arnane Carmel Utilities Distribution Carmel Utilities Collection' 34 West 131 Street 901 North Range, Line Road Westfield, IN 46074 Carmel, IN 46032 14. Carmel Utilities subscribe_ s to "Holey Moley" who should be contacted directly for all water main locations. 15. The following items will be sent electronically upon request regarding this correspondence and project: a: Project. Approval Checklist: b. Performance /Maintenance' Guarantees c. Utility Jurisdictions /Right of Way Permits d. Availability (acreage) Fees BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS AND SAFETY 16. A schedule for Board of Public Works and Safety meeting dates and agenda deadlines will be sent electronically for your use upon request. Please use the Engineering Department deadlines for submissions to the Board: 17. Any submission to the Board requires prior approval by the Cannel Clay Plan Commission and /or the Board of Zoning Appeals (if applicable) and completion of review by the Technical Advisory Committee. All written requests to be placed on the Board's agenda must include; the appropriate Docket Number and the date (or dates) of approval by the Plan Commission and /or the Board of Zoning Appeals (if applicable). 18. Water Availability and Sanitary Sewer approval from the Board will be required This is an EDU approval based upon the proposed use of the site Reference Items #33 to #35 below for additional details /explanations. Please note that if an entryway'or other irrigation system is planned :for this development, additional Water Availability Approval from the Board will be required and additional Water Connection Fees will be assessed based upon the size;and usage of the system as determined by the Director of Carmel Utilities. 19. Commercial Curb Cut. Approval, Please provide 8 x 11 exhibits with the request for approval; Provide all pertinent information including lane widths, overall width, radii, lane markings location of opposingdrives:or streets, relationship to the location of previous curb cut, etc: Mr. David M. Griffee, P.E. January I8, 2011 RE: Penn Circle- Project Review #1 Page of 4 20. Temporary Construction Entrance Approval. A temporary construction entrance is not shown on these. plans. Please indicate the location of a temporary construction entrance in the next submittal. 21. The installation of any permanent, privately owned and/or maintained improvement (signs, decorative street signs, walls, streetlights, etc.) within dedicated right of way or dedicated easements requires the execution of a Consent to Encroach Agreement between the Owner and the City of Carmel. Such agreements are executed by the Board' of Public Works and Safety: The City Engineer may approve irrigation system agreements. 22. Secondary Plat approval if applicable. All performance guarantees must be posted prior to submission of secondary plats for Board of Public Works and Safety approval. 23. Dedication of right -of- way if not platted. This is based upon the: City' of Carmel 20 -Year Thoroughfare Plan requirements. Dedication documents are available upon request. Please be advised that all Right -of -Way Dedications must be accompanied by a Sales Disclosure Agreement completed by the owner for the property being dedicated to the City. The dedication document cannot be recorded without a completed Sales, Disclosure. The form is available upon request. 24: Any open pavement cuts of either Old Meridian Street or Grand Boulevard, other than those required for the curb and median cuts, will require Board approval. BONDING REQUIREMENTS 25. Please contact Mr. Dave Barnes to review performance guarantee requirements. Please contact Mr. John Duffy to review water and sanitary sewer bonding requirements. 26. The amount of the Performance Guarantee is based upon a certified Engineer's Estimate for 100% of the cost of labor and materials to construct the individual improvements, to be provided by the design engineer. Please provide detailed Engineer's Estimates for each improvement including quantities, unit costs, pipe sizes, and materials, etc. 27. Upon completion and release of individual Performance Guarantees a three -year Maintenance Guarantee will be required (see Street Sign comments' above). The Maintenance Guarantee amount is based upon 15% of the Performance amount for Streets and Curbs and l0% of the Performance amount for all other improvements. 28. Performance Guarantees .may be Performance or Subdivision Bonds or Irrevocable Letters of Credit. 29. Please reference the available enclosures for more detailed explanation of our procedures. RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT AND BONDING 30. Any work in the dedicated right -of -way will require an approved Right -of -Way Permit and a License Permit. Bond. 31. The bond aniountis determined by our Right -of -Way Manager. However, if the work is included in the scope of work of a required and posted. Performance Guarantee, the Performance Guarantee may be used to satisfy the bond requirements of the Right -of -Way Permit. 32. Please contact our Right -of- -Way Manager, Fred Glaser, to arrange right -of -way permitting and bonding. AVAILABILITY AND CONNECTION FEES 33. We defer to Cannel Utilities regarding this issue. 34. if an entryway or overall site irrigation system is planned for this development, additional Water Connection Fees will be assessed based upon the size and usage of the system and upon the recommendations of the Director of Carmel Utilities. 35. These fees are required to be paid prior to final approval of construction plans by Engineering and prior to issuance of building permits by Building Codes Services. Please confirm these fees and calculations with Carmel Utilities. Mr. David M, Griffee, P.E. January 18, 2011 RE: Penn Circle- Project Review. #1 Page 4 of 4 CONSTRUCTION DRAWING REVIEW COMMENTS 36. General Comments a. This project is subject to the City's. Storm Water Management and Storm Water Quality Ordinances. b. Please add the following note to the drawings IF IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO RELOCATE EXISTING UTILITIES, THE EXPENSE OF SUCH RELOCATION SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER. ALL UTILITY POLES SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN ONE FOOT OF THE PROPOSED RIGHT -OF- WAY." 37. Please: add note stating "NO EARTH DISTURBING ACTIVITY MAY COMMENCE WITHOUT AN APPROVED STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT" to construction set. 38. All swales on site must have sub surface pipe installed. Pipe to conform to requirements of Storm Water Technical Standards Manual and shall be double wall, HI -Q pipe. 39. Please omit Sheet C2.0, Planting Plan 12/14/10; Sheet C2.1, Planting Plan -Pool; Sheet L1 02, Planting Details; and Sheet CB3201, Lighting, Layout, from construction sets to be submitted for review by this department. The Department of Engineering does not have approval authority over landscape plans or photometric plans. 40. Please provide a title sheet. If you have questions, please contact me at 571 -2441. Sincerely, Nicholas J. Redden, P.E. Plan Review. Coordinator Department of Engineering cc: Angelina Conn, Department of Community Services John Duffy, Carmel Utilities Paul Pace, Carmel Utilities Paul Arnone, Carmel Utilities Greg Hoyes Hamilton County Surveyor's Office Greg llko, Crossroad Engineers, PC issvrapps\user data \za shared\D1- IILL\PROJ REY 1 LEREV# 1 Conn, Angelina V From: John S. Neely [jneely @pfmautomotive.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 3:53 PM To: 'Dave Coots' Cc: 'Mark Shegon'; Conn, Angelina V Subject: RE: Barrington rezone? Mr. Coots, At first look, the development plan and landscaping plan appear to be different than what was previously approved. Are the exhibits reflecting the anticipated changes? if the exhibits are correct they appear to be different from the last ones saw. I am requesting a reasonable amount of time to review your plans. I was not notified or given any information regarding your request until late this morning. I am sure that you appreciate my situation as I granted your request for a continuance when you had a limited amount of time to review our plans last spring. Please let me know if you in agreement with my request. John S Neely, President PFM Automotive Management (317) 733 -3977 pfmautomotive.com From: Dave Coots jmailto:DCootsOchwlaw.coml Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 2:42 PM To: John S. Neely Cc: Mark Shegon; Conn, Angelina V Subject: RE: Barrington rezone? Mr. Neely, the amendment to the PUD we seek relates to the unit mix approved in the original ordinance. Since the original PUD contained within the ordinance the number of independent living units, assisted living units, memory support and nursing care units, to change the mix, we have to seek plan commission and council approval. Our petition seeks to reduce the independent living units from 171 to 141; increase assisted living units from 44 to 56; increase memory support from 18 to 26 and increase the number of skilled nursing care units from 30 to 38. There are no changes pending before the plan commission to alter the exterior elevations, building heights, etc. The landscaping remains the same as does the development plan, only the mix of residents allowed by the ordinance is being modified. From: John S. Neely Finailto :ineelyftfmautomotive.comj Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 12:41 PM To: Dave Coots Subject: FW: Barrington rezone? Mr. Coots, John S Neely, President PFM Automotive Management I just received the information regarding your rezoning request today, for some reason I was not included in your neighboring property notification. I am going to need time to evaluate the impact of your changes on our site and I will need to ask for a continuance. Please let me know if you are in agreement with my request. 1 January 13, 2011 Mr. David Griffee Civil Site Solutions 11925 East 65 St, ste 9 Indianapolis, IN 46236 RE: Penn Circle Dear Mr. Griffee: City of Ca DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES The following letter represents comments for this project specifically addressing the area of alternative transportation. I have reviewed the project submitted for the January 19, 2011 Technical Advisory Committee meeting, and offer the following comments: Alternative Transportation Review and Comments 1) The Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan requires the construction of a 10' asphalt path along Pennsylvania St and an enhanced sidewalk along Old Meridian. Please revise the plans to include and label these facilities. 2) The City of Carmel Parking Ordinance requires all multifamily residence developments include bicycle parking at a rate of one (1) bicycle parking space for every three (3) dwelling units. Please see the City of Carmel's Parking Ordinance in order to determine appropriate locations and construction details for the required bicycle parking for the apartments and the office building. 3) Please consider providing including long term covered bicycling parking for the apartments. If this is already in consideration please provide details on how this will be provided. 4) Please connect all internal sidewalks to each other, provide a sidewalk on both sides of the parking lot entrance on Old Meridian, and provide sidewalk connections to the garages. Please revise the plans to reflect these changes. ONE CIVIC SQUARE Page 1 CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571 -2417 5) Please indicate ADA compliant handicap ramps at all crossings. We request that all responses to our comments be provided in writing. Failure to provide written responses may result in delay of the review process. It is critical that this office be made aware of all modification made on the plans being re- submitted, particularly if any such changes are considered "new" or fall outside of our previous reviews. Please provide revised plans indicating all revisions. Please notify us of any changes and specifically state any changes, including changes resulting from Plan Commission, Special Studies or other committee meetings. The Department of Community Services reserves the right to provide additional comments based on subsequent reviews. If you have questions, please contact me at 571 -2417. Sincerely, David Littlejohn Alternative Transportation Coordinator Department of Community Services City of Ca cc: Angie Conn, Department of Community Services Engineering Department Review Project File ONE CIVIC SQUARE Page 2 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571 -2417 Conn, Angelina V From: Conn, Angelina V Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 12:16 PM To: 'Jon Dobosiewicz' Cc: 'Charlie Frankenberger'; Boone, Rachel M.; Hollibaugh, Mike P Subject: Additional review comments for Penn Circle (docket no. 10120011 ADLS Amend) Jon Below are additional review comments, mostly about signage, and some general. Also, do you know when we will receive the revised building elevations? When would you like to meet with Staff to discuss the project revisions? -Angie Conn, Planning Administrator From: Boone, Rachel M. Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 12:01 PM To: Conn, Angelina V Subject: Penn Circle comments Angie, here are some comments for the new Penn Circle project: Overall: 1. Not a fan of the proposed building colors..dark brown, light brown, and yellow? 2. I know it's cheaper but why do they want to put the lap board siding on the backs of the building? It doesn't look great. 3. These buildings just don't look as nice as what Meridian Pointe presented. (Many of the planners agree with this one.) 4, For landscaping around the pool I don't know what they've chosen, but I do hope there are some tall evergreens proposed. It's always nice when there's some privacy around apartment pools. Signage: L They have proposed 2 projecting ID signs, 1 wall sign and 2 ground signs. Only 2 signs are allowed. However, we could consider this a complex and allow them a complex directory sign. 2. They'll need variances to have all 5 ID signs. The Dept. probably won't support those variances because all the signs are not necessary. Different combos could be used to provide adequate identification. 3. I like the projecting sign and ground sign designs. I think the best option is to utilize the 2 ground signs, but move them to the main entrances. The entrance on the NW side of the site could have a small directional sign to identify that entrance. 4 The stop sign and street sign combo: Should we require them to use the fancy street sign names like the rest of Old Meridian has recently converted to? I think it would be more appropriate for the area. 5. Am ok with all the speed limit, future resident, etc. signs. Might need to add /see a small, 3 sq. ft. or less and 3' tall or less directional sign for entrances not identified by a monument sign. 6. Address sign sizes and locations are ok. 7. The proposed construction sign size is fine. However I would like to see the design /picture of the proposed site instead of just the name. (Especially because the leasing signs will look exactly the same with just a different size.) We will also need more specifics on actual contractor info on the sign before issuing the sign permit. I cannot allow this sign to go up until plans have been approved and construction has begun. Only 2 signs are allowed one to each street frontage. (They have proposed 3.) 8. 'For Lease' signs fit the size requirements. They have proposed 1, and 2 are allowed. 9. Again, my preference is for the ground signs, not the projecting signs. If we considered one of the ground signs as a directory sign, they could also have the wall sign above the leasing office entrance, I am ok with this. 10. Ground signs are not shown on site plan or landscaping plans. 1 That's it for now...let me know what you think. Thanks, 2a Boo Sign Permit Specialist City of Carmel_ Department of Community Services 3rd Floor, One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 317.571.2417 phone 317.571.2426 fax http: /www.ci.carmel.in.us /services /communityservice.html Please consider the environment before printing this e -mail 2 Conn, Angelina V From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Conn, Angelina V Wednesday, January 05, 2011 1:55 PM 'Jon Dobosiewicz' 'Charlie Frankenberger'; Boone, Rachel M.; Hollibaugh, Mike P review comments for Penn Circle (docket no. 10120011 ADLS Amend) Carmel Green Building Checklist.doc Good afternoon, Jon. Please reply to each of the: preliminary review comments for the Penn Circle ADLS Amendment Application via email or letter correspondence on or before Jan. 18, 2011. Additional review comments may be voiced at the Jan. 19 TAC meeting. Also, it is our understanding that revised building elevations will be submitted to us later this week, so we will provide additional review comments after we receive those. Thank you. Preliminary Planning2oninq Dept review comments: 1. Compare and contrast the Meridian Pointe elevations and plans to the Penn Circle elevations and plans, so the committee can easily see what is changing or remaining the same. 2. Please provide copies of your correspondence with the TAC members and their correspondence with you. 3. Feel'free to bring color and material samples to the Plan Commission meeting. 4. Provide the site plan overlaid on an aerial photograph of immediate area. 5. Please provide digital files of the final approved plans and elevations, in addition to paper copies. 6. Pleaselabel the total number of apartmentunits on the site plan. 7. Building entrances shall be defined and articulated by architectural elements such as lintels, pediments, pilasters, columns, and other design elements appropriate to the architectural style and details of the building as a- whole. 8.. Need vinyl window details: All window design shall be compatible with the style, materials, color, details and proportion of the buil.di.ng. The number•of panes, the way it opens, the trim around it and whether it is embellished with shutters must be consistent with the architectural style of the structure. 9. If possible, provide color photo examples'of similar apartment communities or submit the 3D perspective renderings as shown in a pre submittal meeting. (The color building elevations do not show much detail.) 10. Can brick be used on the first floors of the building exterior, instead of brick veneer? 11. On building type 3, please add four windows total on the middle portion of the building? (two small ones on each side 2x2) 12. Suggestion: could your client design some of the units on the first floor of the buildings facing Old Meridian St. to be able to be converted into office (and a little retail) at a later date? (Like at Legacy Towns Flats.) 13. Does the trash area accommodate recycling per zoning ordinance section 20G.04.07.C(1)? Any Accessory Building for storage or disposal of refuse shall accommodate waste and recyclable materials, and, if applicable, grease or other cooking refuse. 14. Ground level mechanical /telecommunication equipment shall be screened from Old Meridian Street using walls, fencing, landscaping, or other method approved by the Commission. Please label the mechanical equipment locations on the site plan and provide details on how they are screened from view. This includes electric and gas meters. 15. Please label the garage door materials: 16. Future Development `outlot': please plant trees around the outlot, add a temporary mulch path through, etc., similar to what Meridian Pointe was going to do for temporary aesthetics. 17. Street lighting shall be provided as part of all.projects, on both sides of the street when possible, and spaced no less than one hundred (100) feet apart, and of a design per the adopted City style. 18. Please make sure that all exterior light fixtures have flat lenses and 90- degree cut offs. 19. On the site plan, show the parking space calculations required, using the OM- Office subarea requirements, as well as the Dwelling, multifamily requirements in Ch. 27. 20. Label the building setbacks from the road right of way. (Front building setbacks must be at least 15.75 -ft per the variance granted in 2009.) 21. Label the road rights of way boundaries, per the Thoroughfare Plan Map within the Comprehensive Plan. 22. Please consider using LEED or `green' building practices, such as a white roof, solar panels, pervious pavers in all or part of the parking area, bioswales, etc. 23. Please verify with the City Engineering Dept. that the curb cut locations are satisfactory. 1 24. Prepare an estimated construction cost to comply with the Thoroughfare Plan Alternative Transportation Plan; contact the Engineering Dept. for more details. Gary Duncan can be contacted at 317- 571 -2441 or gduncan @carmel.in.gov. 25. Walkways for buildings fronting on Old Meridian Street shall occur at intervals no less than one hundred -fifty (150) feet. 26. There are a couple of areas that need better sidewalk connectivity; please work with David Littlejohn, Alternative Transportation Systems Coordinator, on this. 27. Extend sidewalk connection to go from northeast corner of site to parking area, along the north area of the easternmost building. 28. Please work with David Littlejohn, Alternative Transportation Systems Coordinator, on what paths, bike lanes, and sidewalks are required for this site. His contact info is 317 -571 -2417 and dlittlejohn @carmel.in.gov 29. Please show/label the bicycle parking area and provide the bike rack details, per chapter 27.06 of the ordinance. 30. Please label the percent of the site's impervious surface. 31. Rachel Boone, Sign Permits Officer, will soon issue review comments on the signage package possible variances needed. Her contact info is 317- 571 -2417 and rboone @carmel.in.gov. 32. Note: most likely, the Subdivision Committee will review this item and then forward it to the full Plan Commission to get feedback from all plan commission members. Thank you, Angie Conn, Nanning Administrator City of Carmel Planning Zoning Division Dept. of Community Services 1 Civic Square, 3rd Flr. Carmel, IN 46032 0: 317-571-2417 1 F: 317 571 -2426 1 E: aconn@carmel.in.gov W: www.carmel.in.gov /services /DOCS /DOCSDOPZ.htm Please consider the environment before printing this e mail 2 Conn, Angelina V From: Sent: To: Subject: Hi Angie, Here are some of my thoughts about Penn Circle. Mostly I thought it looked pretty good. Lex I like that one of the buildings faces the trees to the north of this site if it stays preserved as wetland /natural area. 1 think this could provide some nice views for those apartments. I like that they have entrances off of both Pennsylvania and Old Meridian and are connecting to the corner parcel. This will provide good connectivity. I would like to see the site plan meet the Old Meridian District Master Plan a little more with the road splitting the corner parcel from the residential one. It is good they have access there but I wonder if we should make them line the entrance off of Old Meridian up with the one onto Pennsylvania or dedicate it to the City. Should the other streets be dedicatedto the City as well? Otherwise I think they would need a variance. I also like that they have several pedestrian entrances to the building along Old Meridian. It's nice that they tried to put a lot of trees in the parking lot. I am not much of an architect, but do they need more of a defined base or foundation according to the Ordinance? On building type 3, could they put four windows total on the middle portion of the building? (two small ones on each side) Have they thought, or could they design some of the units on the first floor of the buildings facing Old Meridian to be able to be converted into retail or office at a later date? Like some of the ones at Legacy. Does the trash area accommodate recycling per 20G.04.07.C(1)? There were also a couple of areas that I thought the sidewalk could be extended to provide further connection, but 1 figured David would probably look at that as well. From: Conn, Angelina V Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 10:29 AM To: Hollibaugh, Mike P Cc: Donahue -Wold, Alexia K Subject: RE: Penn Circle #10120011 ADLS Amend) Mike I think they comply, overall. But 1 am still on the fence about it. I would like you to take a look at the plans on Monday, please, to get your opinion on it. (Lex- can you take a look, too, and let me know what you think about it Have a great Christmas! -Angie From: Hollibaugh, Mike P Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 4:18 PM Donahue -Wold, Alexia K Tuesday, January 04, 2011 5:08 PM Conn, Angelina V; Hollibaugh, Mike P RE: Penn Circle #10120011 ADLS Amend) 1 Conn, Angelina V From: Jon Dobosiewicz [jond @NF LAW.COM] Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 2:20 PM To: Conn, Angelina V Subject: RE: Jan. 4 Plan Commission committee meetings agendas Angie, Thanks for making the change at the last minute. Please let this e -mail confirm my request to remove the Penn Circle item from consideration at the January 4 Committee meetings. I will get back with you on the future date. Thanks, Jon Jon C. Dobosiewicz Land Use Professional Nelson Frankenberger, PC 3105 East 98th Street, Suite 170 Indianapolis, IN 46280 317- 844 -0106 (Office) 317- 428 -8393 (Cell) 317 846 -8782 (Fax) jon@nf-law.com NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY This E -mail message and its attachments (if any) are intended solely for the use of the addressee hereof. In addition, this message and the attachments (if any) may contain information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are prohibited from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing, disseminating or otherwise using this transmission. Delivery of this message to any person other than the intended recipient is not intended to waive any right or privilege. If you have received this message in error, please promptly notify the sender by reply E -mail and immediately delete this message from your system. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. From: Conn, Angelina V jmailto:Aconn @carmel.in.aov1 Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 12:17 PM To: Dorman, Jay; Forwarding E -mail, Dierckman, Leo; Steve Stromquist; Susan Westermeier; Rider, Kevin D; brad.grabow +cpc@gmail.com; irizarryhm @lilly.com; Hagan, Judy; Kestner, Nick; ephraimwilfong @gmail.com; indylawson @gmail.com Cc: Angie Molt; Boone, Rachel M.; Bruce Smith; Donahue -Wold, Alexia K; Duncan, Gary R; Ellison, Christopher M; Hancock, Ramona B; Heck, Nancy S; Hollibaugh, Mike P; John Molitor; Keeling, Adrienne M; Linda Burdett Ham Co PC; Littlejohn, David W; Marilyn Anderson; Mark Zukerman; Randy Marra; webteam@heckweb.net; Rick Osborn; Ron Houck; Stewart, Lisa M; Tingley, Connie S; bill.ruthhart@ indystar.com; Worthley, Matthew D; mw9285 @aol.com; Hayes, Melanie; 1 Fees: ADLS Amend Application Fee: $1,072.24 Total Fee: $1,072.24 Conn, Angelina V From: Sent: To: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Due By: Flag Status: Angie, has there been any more thought or conversation about needing a variance from Sections 20G.04.02.B? or 20G.04.01.A? From: Conn, Angelina V Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 10:58 AM To: Hollibaugh, Mike P; 'John Molitor' Subject: FW: Penn Circle #10120011 ADLS Amend) Hi, Mike and John Is there any way we can have the subd. committee review it on Jan. 4, but then have them forward it to the full plan commission to review, too, on Feb. 15? Kind of like an ADLS? There are a lot of plans and elevations to review. It is almost like we have to review a brand new project.... -Angie Follow up Monday, January 03, 2011 9:30 AM Flagged From: Conn, Angelina V Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 4:11 PM To: Boone, Rachel M.; Blanchard, Jim E; Donahue -Wold, Alexia K; Hancock, Ramona B; Hollibaugh, Mike P; Keeling, Adrienne M; Littlejohn, David W; Martin, Candy; Mindham, Daren; Stewart, Lisa M; Tingley, Connie S; Mishler, Nicholas F; Blanchard, Jim E; Duncan, Gary R; Redden, Nick Cc: 'Jon Dobosiewicz'; Charlie Frankenberger Subject: Docket No. Assignment: (ADLS Amend) Penn Circle #10120011 ADLS Amend) I have issued the necessary Docket Number for (ADLS Amend) Penn Circle. It is the following: Docket No. 10120011 ADLS Amend: Penn Circle (former Meridian Pointe site) The applicant seeks site plan and design approval amendments for a 173 -unit multi- family development. The site is located at 12346 Old Meridian St. It is zoned OM /O Old Meridian District, Office. Filed by Charlie Frankenberger of Nelson Frankenberger, on behalf of G. B. Developers II, LLC. Mr. Jon Dobosiewicz, land use specialist, and Mr. Frankenberger, project attorney, can be contacted at 317- 844 -0106. Hollibaugh, Mike P Tuesday, December 21, 2010 4:18 PM Conn, Angelina V RE: Penn Circle #10120011 ADLS Amend) Petitioner, please note the following: 1. This Item will appear on the January 19, 2011 agenda of the Technical Advisory Committee. If not done already, the petitioner must submit plans and review materials to all TAC members ASAP via email and /or mail. The updated TAC members list is online at: http: /www.ci.carmel.in.us /services /DOCS /DOCSTAC2004.htm. 1 Conn, Angelina V From: David M. Griffee [dgriffee @civilsitepc.com] Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 10:21 AM To: Conn, Angelina V; Donahue -Wold, Alexia K; Mindham, Daren; Littlejohn, David W; Akers, William P; Huffman, David; Thomas, John G; greg .hoyes @hamiltoncounty.in.gov; gilko @crossroadengineers.com; Duncan, Gary R; Redden, Nick; david.lucas @hamiltoncounty.in.gov; Hohlt, William G; Blanchard, Jim E; Duffy, John M; Green, Timothy J; Ellison, Christopher M; Krueskamp, Theresa A; Forward for Westermeier, Mark; jason. lemaster @hamiltoncounty.in.gov; brooke. gajownik @hamiltoncounty.in.gov; jason .kirkman @mybrighthouse.com; shirley.hunter @duke- energy.com; gary.mcnamee @duke energy.com; jlclark @vectren.com; dan.davenport @aes.com; duane .whiting @veoliawaterna.com; rfarrand @ccs.kl2.in.us; ryan.hartman @ctrwd.org; troy.yackle @sug.com; doland.w.wise @usps.gov; sk4986 @att.com Cc: 'David Leazenby'; 'Greg Martin'; 'Weisiger, Buzz'; 'Richard Hoover' Subject: Penn Circle TAC Filing Attachments: (1)10 137 Penn Circle C2.0.SP.pdf; (2)10 -137 Penn Circle C3.0.GP.pdf; (3)C2.0 _PLANTING_PLAN.pdf; (4)02.1_PLANTING_PLAN_POOL.pdf; (5)L1.02 PLANTING_DETAILS.pdf; 2010 -12 -16 Storm Drainage Report.pdf; (6)Lighting Plan.pdf; Patriot.pdf; patriot_family.pdf Carmel TAC Members: Last week both TAC and ADLS Applications were filed for a new project called Penn Circle. The TAC mailing was to include a CD containing digital files, however, the CD was pulled out at the last minute before mailing due to some incorrect file name references. The files intended for distribution are attached to this e-mail, Thank you, Dave David M. Griffee, PE Civil Site Solutions, PC 11925 East 65th Street, Suite 9 Indianapolis, Indiana 46236 Mobile (317) 459 -9804 Fax (317) 947 -0532 dgriffeecivilsitepc.com www.civilsitepc.com 1 Civil Site Solutions, PC Letter Transmittal To From Angie Conn /Alexia Donahue -Wold David M. Griffee, PE City of Carmel Telephone: (317) 459 -9804 Department of Community Services Fax: (317) 947 -0532 One Civic Square, 3rd Floor Email: dgriffee @civilsitepc.com Carmel, Indiana 46032 TAC Submittal for Penn Circle Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz Message: CIVIL SITE SOLUTIONS Date of Transmittal: December 17, 2010 CSSPC Job Number: 10 -137 Delivered Via: US Mail 11925 East 65th Street, Suite 9 Indianapolis, Indiana 46236 Please find TAC Submittal items attached for Penn Circle. The plans have been provided in both a paper and digital format. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. JAMES J. NELSON CHARLES D. FRANKENBERGER JAMES E. SHINAVER LAWRENCE J. KEMPER JOHN B. FLATT FREDRIC LAWRENCE JAMES A. NICKLOY CHRISTOPHER A. FERGUSON Angie Conn City of Carmel One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 Enclosures December 22 January 4 January 19 Penn Circle filing Ltr to A Conn 121710 NELSON FRANKENBERGER A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3105,EAST 98TH STREET, SUITE 170 INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46280 PHONE: 317- 844 -0106 FACSIMILE: 317- 846 -8782 December 17, 2010 Re: Penn Circle ADLS Amend (Meridian Point) Dear Angie: Enclosed you will find an application for ADLS Amend for the above referenced matter. The engineer has affected the TAC distribution, and our anticipated schedule is as follows: Provide information packets to. DOCS (noon deadline) Special Studies Committee TAC Should you have any questions regarding this, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, NELSON FRANKENBERGER, P.C. Jon C. Dobosiewicz Land Use Professional JANE B. MERRILL, Of Counsel JON C. DOBOSIEWICZ, Land Use Professional Civil Site Solutions, PC Letter Transmitta To From Greg Hoyes David M. Griffee, PE Hamilton County Surveyor's Office Telephone: (317) 459 -9804 1 Hamilton County Square, Suite 188 Fax: (317) 947 -0532 Noblesville, Indiana 46060 Email: dgriffee @civilsitepc.com TAC Submittal for Penn Circle Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz Message: CIVIL SITE SOLUTIONS Date of Transmittal: December 17, 2010 CSSPC Job Number: 10 -137 Delivered Via: US Mail 11925 East 65th Street, Suite 9 Indianapolis, Indiana 46236 Please find TAC Submittal items attached for Penn Circle. The plans have been provided in both a paper and digital format. Additionally, a drainage report is included. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Message: CIVIL SITE SOLUTIONS Civil Site Solutions, PC Letter Tra n s rte a tta To From Gary Duncan /Nick Redden David M. Griffee, PE City of Carmel, Engineering Department Telephone: (317) 459 -9804 One Civic Square, 1st Floor Fax: (317) 947 -0532 Carmel, Indiana 46032 Email: dgriffee @civllsitepc.com TAC Submittal for Penn Circle Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz Date of Transmittal: December 17, 2010 CSSPC Job Number: 10 -137 Delivered Via: US Mail 11925 East 65th Street, Suite 9 Indianapolis, Indiana 46236 Please find TAC Submittal items attached for Penn Circle. The plans have been provided in both a paper and digital format. Additionally, a drainage report is included. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. CIVIL SITE SOLUTIONS Civil Site Solutions, PC Letter Transmittal To From Gregory Ilko David M. Griffee, PE ;CrossRoad Engineers Telephone: (317) 459 -9804 3417 South Sherman Drive Fax: (317) 947 -0532 Beech Grove, Indiana 46107 Email: dgriffee @civilsitepc.com TAC Submittal for Penn Circle Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz Message: Date of Transmittal: December 17, 2010 CSSPC Job Number: 10 -137 Delivered Via: US Mail 11925 East 65th Street, Suite 9 Indianapolis, Indiana 46236 Please find TAC Submittal items attached for Penn Circle. The plans have been provided in both a paper and digital format. Additionally, a drainage report is included. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. CIVIL SITE SOLUTIONS Civil Site Solutions, PC Letter Transmitta To From Angie Conn /Alexia Donahue -Wold David M. Griffee, PE City of Carmel Telephone: (317) 459 -9804 Department of Community Services Fax: (317) 947 -0532 One Civic Square, 3rd Floor Email: dgriffee @civilsitepc.com Carmel, Indiana 46032 TAC Submittal for Penn Circle Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz Message: Please find TAC Submittal items attached for Penn Circle. The plans have been provided in both a paper and digital format. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Date of Transmittal: CSSPC Job Number: Delivered Via: December 17, 2010 10 -137 US Mail 11925 East 65th Street, Suite 9 Indianapolis, Indiana 46236 Message: CIVIL SITE SOLUTIONS Civil Site Solutions, PC Letter Transmittal To From Daren Mindham David M. Griffee, PE City of Carmel Telephone: (317) 459 -9804 Urban Forestry DOCS Fax: (317) 947-0532 One Civic Square, 3rd Floor Email: dgriffee ©civilsitepc.com Carmel, Indiana 46032 TAC Submittal for Penn Circle Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz Date of Transmittal: December 17, 2010 CSSPC Job Number: 10 -137 Delivered Via: US Mail 11925 East 65th Street, Suite 9 Indianapolis, Indiana 46236 Please find TAC Submittal items attached for Penn Circle. The plans have been provided in both a paper and digital format. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. CIVIL SITE SOLUTIONS Civil Site Solutions, PC Letter Transmittal David Littlejohn David M. Griffee, PE City of Carmel Telephone: (317) 459 =9804 Alternative Transportation Systems DOCS Fax: (317) 947 -0532 One Civic Square, 3rd Floor Email: dgriffee @civilsitepc.com Carmel, Indiana 46032 TAC Submittal for Penn Circle Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz Message: From Date of Transmittal: December 17, 2010 CSSPC Job Number: 10 -137 Delivered Via: US Mail 11925 East 65th Street, Suite 9 Indianapolis, Indiana 46236 Please find TAC Submittal items attached for Penn Circle. The plans have been provided in both a paper and digital format. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Bill Akers Message: CIVIL SITE SOLUTIONS Civil Site Solutions, PC Letter Transmitta To From TAC Submittal for Penn Circle Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz David M. Griffee, PE Carmel Clay Communications Department. Telephone: (317) 459 -9804 31 First Avenue NW Fax: (317) 947 -0532 Carmel, Indiana 46032 Email: dgriffee @civilsitepc.com Date of Transmittal: December 17, 2010 CSSPC Job Number: 10 -137 Delivered Via: US Mail 11925 East 65th Street, Suite 9 Indianapolis, Indiana 46236 Please find TAC Submittal items attached for Penn Circle. The plans have been provided in both a paper and digital format. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Civil Site Solutions, PC CIVIL SITE Letter Transmitta SOLUTIONS TAC Submittal for Penn Circle Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz T From Dave Huffman David M. Griffee, PE City of Carmel Telephone: (317) 459 -9804 Street Department Fax: (317) 947 -0532 3400 West 131st Street Email: dgriffee @civilsitepc.com Carmel, Indiana 46074 Date of Transmittal: December 17, 2010 CSSPC Job Number: 10 -137 Delivered Via: US Mail 11925 East 65th Street, Suite 9 Indianapolis, Indiana 46236 Message: Please find TAC Submittal items attached for Penn Circle. The plans have been provided in both a paper and digital format. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. CIVIL SITE SOLUTIONS Civil Site Solutions, PC Letter Transmitta To From John Thomas David M. Griffee, PE City of Carmel Telephone: (317) 459 -9804 Engineering Department Fax: (317) 947 -0532 One Civic Square, 1st Floor Email: dgriffee @civilsitepc.com Carmel, Indiana 46032 TAC Submittal for Penn Circle Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz Message: Date of Transmittal: December 17, 2010 CSSPC Job Number: 10 -137 Delivered Via: US Mail 11925 East 65th Street, Suite 9 Indianapolis, Indiana 46236 Please find TAC Submittal items attached for Penn Circle. The plans have been provided in both a paper and digital format. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Message: CIVIL SITE SOLUTIONS Civil Site Solutions, PC Letter Transmitta TAC Submittal for Penn Circle Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz To From David Lucas David M. Griffee, PE Hamilton County Highway Department Telephone: (317) 459 -9804 1700 South 10th Street Fax: (317) 947 -0532. Noblesville, Indiana 46060 Email: dgriffee @civilsitepc.com Date of Transmittal: December 17, 2010 CSSPC Job Number: 10 -137 Delivered Via: US Mail 11925 East 65th Street, Suite 9 Indianapolis, Indiana 46236 Please find TAC Submittal items attached for Penn Circle. The plans have been provided in both a paper and digital format. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. CIVIL SITE SOLUTIONS Civil Site Solutions, PC Letter Transmitta To From Bill Hohlt/Jim Blanchard David M. Griffee, PE City of Carmel Telephone: (317) 459 -9804 Building and Code Services Department Fax: (317) 947 -0532 One Civic Square, 1st Floor Email: dgriffee@civilsitepc:com Carmel, Indiana 46032 TAC Submittal for Penn Circle Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz Message: Date of Transmittal: December 17, 2010 CSSPC Job Number: 10 -137 Delivered Via: US Mail 11925 East 65th Street, Suite 9 Indianapolis, Indiana 46236 Please find TAC Submittal items attached for Penn. Circle. The plans have been provided in both a paper and digital format. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. CIVIL SITE SOLUTIONS Civil Site Solutions, PC Letter Transrnitta To From John Duffy David M. Griffee, PE City of Carmel Telephone: (317) 459 -9804 Utilities Department Fax: (317) 947 -0532 760 Third Avenue SW Email: dgriffee @civilsitepc.com Carmel, Indiana 46032 TAC Submittal for Penn Circle Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz Message: Date of Transmittal: December 17, 2010 CSSPC Job Number: 10 -137 Delivered Via: US Mail 11925 East 65th Street, Suite 9 Indianapolis, Indiana 46236 Please find TAC Submittal items attached for Penn Circle. The plans have been provided in both a paper and digital format. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Message: CIVIL SITE SOLUTIONS Civil Site Solutions, PC Letter Transmittal To From Tim Green David M. Griffee, PE City of Carmel Telephone: (317) 459 -9804 Office of Police Chief Fax: (317) 947 -0532 Three Civic Square Email: dgriffee @civilsitepc.com Carmel, Indiana 46032 TAC Submittal for Penn Circle Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz Date of Transmittal: December 17, 2010 CSSPC Job Number: 10 -137 Delivered Via: US Mail 11925 East 65th Street, Suite 9 Indianapolis, Indiana 46236 Please find TAC Submittal items attached for Penn Circle. The plans have been provided in both a paper and digital format. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. CIVIL SITE SOLUTIONS Civil Site Solutions, PC Letter Transmitta To From Chris Ellison David M. Griffee, PE City of Carmel Telephone: (317) 459 -9804 Office of Fire Chief Fire Station #1 Fax: (317) 947 -0532 Two Civic Square Email: dgriffee @civilsitepc.com Carmel, Indiana 46032 TAC Submittal for Penn Circle Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz Message: Please find TAC Submittal items attached for Penn Circle. The plans have been provided in both a paper and digital format. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Date of Transmittal: December 17, 2010 CSSPC Job Number: 10 -137 Delivered Via: US Mail 11925 East 65th Street, Suite 9 Indianapolis, Indiana 46236 Civil Site Solutions, PC Letter Transmitta TAC Submittal for Penn Circle Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz Message: CIVIL SITE SOLUTIONS To From Terry Krueskamp David M. Griffee, PE City of Carmel Telephone: (317) 459 -9804 Information Systems Department Fax: (317) 947 -0532 Three Civic Square Email: dgriffee @civilsitepc.com Carmel, Indiana 46032 Date of Transmittal: December 17, 2010 CSSPC Job Number: 10 -137 Delivered Via: US Mail 11925 East 65th Street, Suite 9 Indianapolis, Indiana 46236 Please find TAC Submittal items attached for Penn Circle. The plans have been provided in both a paper and digital format. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. CIVIL SITE SOLUTIONS Civil Site Solutions, PC Letter Tra n s rte i tta TAC Submittal for Penn Circle Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz To From Mark Westermeier David M. Griffee, PE Carmel Clay Parks Department Telephone: (317) 459 -9804 1411 East 116th Street Fax: (317) 947 -0532 Carmel, Indiana 46032 Email: dgriffee @civilsitepc.com Date of Transmittal: December 17, 2010 CSSPC Job Number: 10 -137 Delivered Via: US Mail 11925 East 65th Street, Suite 9 Indianapolis, Indiana 46236 Message: Please find TAC Submittal items attached for Penn Circle. The plans have been provided in both a paper and digital format. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. CIVIL SITE SOLUTIONS Civil Site Solutions, PC Letter Transmittal To From Jason Lemaster David M. Griffee, PE Hamilton County Health Department Telephone: (317) 459 -9804 18030 Foundation Drive, Suite A Fax: (317) 947 -0532 Noblesville, Indiana 46060 Email: dgriffee @civilsitepc.com TAC Submittal for Penn Circle Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz Date of Transmittal: December 17, 2010 CSSPC Job Number: 10 -137 Delivered Via: US Mail 11925 East 65th Street, Suite 9 Indianapolis, Indiana 46236 Message: Please find TAC Submittal items attached for Penn Circle. The plans have been provided in both a paper and digital format. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Message: CIVIL SITE SOLUTIONS Civil Site Solutions, PC Letter Transmitta TAC Submittal for Penn Circle Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz To From Brooke Gajownik David M. Griffee, PE Hamilton County Sheriff's Office Telephone: (317) 459 -9804 18100 Cumberland Road Fax: (317) 947 -0532 Noblesville, Indiana 46060 Email: dgriffee @civilsitepc.com Date of Transmittal: December 17, 2010 CSSPC Job Number: 10 -137 Delivered Via: US Mail 11925 East 65th Street, Suite 9 Indianapolis, Indiana 46236 Please find TAC Submittal items attached for Penn Circle. The plans have been provided in both a paper and digital format. If you have any questions,, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Jason Kirkman CIVIL SITE SOLUTIONS Civil Site Solutions, PC Letter Transmitta Brighthouse Networks Telephone: (317) 459-9804 3030 Roosevelt Avenue Fax: (317) 947 -0532 Indianapolis, Indiana 46218 Email: dgriffee @civilsitepc.com TAC Submittal for Penn Circle Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz From David M. Griffee, PE Date of Transmittal: December 17, 2010 CSSPC Job Number: 10 -137 Delivered Via: US Mail 11925 East 65th Street, Suite 9 Indianapolis, Indiana 46236 Message: Please find TAC Submittal items attached for Penn Circle. The plans have been provided in both a paper and digital format. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. CIVIL SITE SOLUTIONS Civil Site Solutions, PC Letter Transmftta To From Shirley Hunter Duke Energy Telephone: (317) 459 -9804 16475 Southpark Drive Fax: (317) 947 -0532 Westfield, Indiana 46074 Email: dgriffee @civilsitepc.com TAC Submittal for Penn Circle Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz Message: Please find TAC Submittal items attached for Penn Circle. The plans have been provided in both a paper and digital format. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. David M. Griffee, PE Date of Transmittal: December 17, 2010 CSSPC Job Number: 10 -137 Delivered Via: US Mail 11925 East 65th Street, Suite 9 Indianapolis, Indiana 46236 Civil Site Solutions, PC Letter Transmftta Gary McNamee CIVIL SITE SOLUTIONS Duke Energy 2727 Central Avenue Columbus, Indiana 47201 TAC Submittal for Penn Circle Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz From Message: Please find TAC Submittal items attached for Penn Circle. The plans have been provided in both a paper and digital format. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. David M. Griffee, PE Telephone: (317) 459 -9804 Fax: (317) 947-0532 Email: dgriffee @civilsitepc.com Date of Transmittal: December 17, 2010 CSSPC Job Number: 10 -137 Delivered Via: US Mail 11925 East 65th Street, Suite 9 Indianapolis, Indiana 46236 Message: CIVIL SITE SOLUTIONS Civil Site Solutions, PC Letter Transmitta TAC Submittal for Penn Circle Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz To From Joanie Clark David M. Griffee, PE Vectren Energy Telephone: (317) 459 -9804 PO Box 1700 Fax: (317) 947-0532 Noblesville, Indiana 46061 Email: dgriffee @civilsitepc.com Date of Transmittal: December 17, 2010 CSSPC Job Number: 10 -137 Delivered Via: US Mail 11925 East 65th Street, Suite 9 Indianapolis, Indiana 46236 Please find TAC Submittal items attached for Penn Circle. The plans have been provided in both a paper and digital format. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. CIVIL SITE SOLUTIONS Civil Site Solutions, PC Letter Transmittal To From Dan Davenport David M. Griffee, PE Indianapolis Power Light Company Telephone: (317) 459 -9804 1230 West Morris Street Fax: (317) 947 -0532 Indianapolis, Indiana 46221 Email: dgriffee @civilsitepc.com TAC Submittal for Penn Circle Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz Message: Please find TAC Submittal items attached for Penn Circle. The plans have been provided in both a paper and digital format. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Date of Transmittal: December 17, 2010 CSSPC Job Number: 10 -137 Delivered Via: US Mail 11925 East 65th Street, Suite 9 Indianapolis, Indiana 46236 Message: CIVIL SITE SOLUTIONS Civil Site Solutions, PC Letter Transmittal To From Duane Whiting David M. Griffee, PE Indianapolis Water Company Telephone: (317) 459 -9804 1220 Waterway Boulevard Fax: (317) 947 -0532 Indianapolis, Indiana 46202 Email: dgriffee @civilsitepc.com TAC Submittal for Penn Circle Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz Date of Transmittal: December 17, 2010 CSSPC Job Number: 10 -137 Delivered Via: US Mail 11925 East 65th Street, Suite 9 Indianapolis, Indiana 46236 Please find TAC Submittal items attached for Penn Circle. The plans have been provided in both a paper and digital format. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Civil Site Solutions, PC Letter Transmitta To From Ron Farrand David M. Griffee, PE Carmel Clay Schools Telephone: (317) 459 -9804 5185 East Main Street Fax: (317) 947 -0532 Carmel, Indiana 46033 Email: dgriffee @civilsitepc.com TAC Submittal for Penn Circle Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz Message: CIVIL SITE SOLUTIONS Date of Transmittal: December 17, 2010 CSSPC Job Number: 10 -137 Delivered Via: US Mail 11925 East 65th Street, Suite 9 Indianapolis, Indiana 46236 Please find TAC Submittal items attached for Penn Circle. The plans have been provided in both a paper and digital format. If you have any questions, please 66 not hesitate to contact our office. CIVIL SITE SOLUTIONS Civil Site Solutions, PC Letter Transmittal To From Ryan Hartman David M. Griffee, PE Clay Township Regional Waste District Telephone: (317) 459 -9804 10701 North College Avenue, Suite A Fax: (317) 947 -0532 Indianapolis, Indiana 46280 Email: dgriffee @civilsitepc.com TAC Submittal for Penn Circle Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz Message: Please find TAC Submittal items attached for Penn Circle. The plans have been provided in both a paper and digital format. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Date of Transmittal: December 17, 2010 CSSPC Job Number: 10 -137 Delivered Via: US Mail 11925 East 65th Street, Suite 9 Indianapolis, Indiana 46236 CIVIL SITE SOLUTIONS Civil Site Solutions, PC Letter Transmittal To From Troy Yackle David M. Griffee, PE Panhandle Eastern Pipeline/Trunkline Gas CompanTelephone: (317) 459 -9804 9371 Zionsville Road Fax: (317) 947 -0532 Indianapolis, Indiana 46268 Email: dgriffee @civilsitepc.com TAC Submittal for Penn Circle Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz Message: Date of Transmittal: December 17, 2010 CSSPC Job Number: 10 -137 Delivered Via: US Mail 11925 East 65th Street, Suite 9 Indianapolis, Indiana 46236 Please find TAC Submittal items attached for Penn Circle. The plans have been provided in both a paper and digital format. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. CIVIL SITE SOLUTIONS Civil Site Solutions, PC Letter Transmittal To From Postmaster c/o Doland Wise David M. Griffee, PE Carmel Post Office, United States Postal Service Telephone: (317) 459 -9804 275 Medical Drive Fax: (317) 947 -0532 Carmel, Indiana 46032 Email: dgriffee @civilsitepc.com TAC Submittal for Penn Circle Cc: Jon Dobosiewlcz Message: Date of Transmittal: December 17, 2010 CSSPC Job Number: 10 -137 Delivered Via: US Mail 11925 East 65th Street, Suite 9 Indianapolis, Indiana 46236 Please find TAC Submittal items attached for Penn Circle. The plans have been provided in both a paper and digital format. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. CIVIL SITE SOLUTIONS Civil Site Solutions, PC Letter Transmittal To From Steven Krebs David M. Griffee, PE Carmel AT &T Engineer Telephone: (317) 459 -9804 5858 North College Avenue Fax: (317) 947 -0532 Indianapolis, Indiana 46220 Email: dgriffee @civilsitepc.com TAC Submittal for Penn Circle Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz Message: Please find TAC Submittal items attached for Penn Circle. The plans have been provided in both a paper and digital format. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Date of Transmittal: December 17, 2010 CSSPC Job Number: 10 -137 Delivered Via: US Mad 11925 East 65th Street, Suite 9 Indianapolis, Indiana 46236