Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes PC 06-19-90CARMEL PLAN. COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JUNE 19, 1990 The regular meeting.of the Carmel Plan Commission was brought to order by Jeff Davis, President on -June 19, 1990 at 7:30 P.M. at the Carmel City Meeting Hall: The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance. The board members: present were Caroline Bainbridge, Sue McMullen, Frank Fleming, Henry, Blackwell, Annabelle' Ogle,: Alan Potasnik, Ila Badger, Jeff Davis, Henrietta Lamb, Ronald Houck, Richard KIar, Max Moore, Alan Potasnik, James O'Neal, and Sharon Clark. 4 The` staff members present were Wes Bucher, Rick Brandau, David Cunningham, Terry Jones, Wm: Wendling, Jr. and Charlene Kelsey. Sue McMullen moved to approve the minutes for the May 15, 1990 meeting as presented. Dick KIar seconded. Approved unanimously. Sue .McMullen inquired. about APA and IPA memberships. Mr. Brandau gave a status report. G. PUBLIC HEARING The public'hearing opened-at 7 :37 p.m. Commission td consider Docket No.. 23=90 PP, a primary plat application for the 'Enclave of Carmel subdivision. The primary plat consists of 501ots on 10.9 acres of land located on the north side of 126th Street just west of Keystone Avenue.. Site is zoned R -2 residence district. Petitioner requests approval to ,subdivide the property into 50 single family residential Tots. The petitioner is requesting the following Subdivision Regulations variances: 6.3.1_ `street jogs less than 150' 6.3.15 curvature of streets less than 150' 6.3:16 min.- distance between reversed street curves. 6.51: min: frontage of lots at right -of way Of 50' 6.5 2: irregular. shaped-lots 6.5.3 planting strip of 20' for Tots that back onto major streets 8:9 sidewalks on both sides of the street within the subdivision and along adjoining streets Filed by E Davis Coots for Eaton Lauth Community Development Company CARMEL PLAN COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JUNE 19, 1990 Sheila Marshall, representing Dave Coots of Coots, Henke Wheeler, made the presentation on behalf of Eaton Lauth, developer of the project, a copy of which is on file at the Carmel Department of Community Development Ms. Marshall explained this parcel has appeared before the Plan Commission earlier as a rezone. Gary Weaver, Architect with Gary Weaver Associates, showed a conceptual site plan. drainage plan, showing the landscaped lake in the center of the pattern, preserving vegetation as much as possible, with the hornet turned away from the busy intersection and limiting frontages on busy streets, varying the streetscape. Average home size intended to be 1450 sq ft to 2000 sq it, 50' wide lots and-0 lot line. Bob Medgekowsky, Woolpert Consultants, explained the proposed landscaping for the interior, exterior, for the main entrance at 126th St (heavy with plantings), and for areas abutting existing neighborhood areas with a concentration on plantings,. also ,fencing along the north, west, and east sides. John Hart, representing the developer, was also present. Jane Voss, 717 Hickory Drive, expressed concern about the height of fencing (5' shadow box) abutting lots adjacent to this project, also with drainage and with traffic, and with children walking to school. In addition, she also questioned when this project might start (late summer) There is a neighborhood committee trying stay abreast. The public hearing closed at 752 P.M. Mr. Weaver spoke to the drainage question and explained there will be an extra lane along 126th to the entry way. John Hart, Eaton Lauth, said they offered to make the project self contained by not opening Melark. Their, preference would be to close it; they can do it either way. He anticipates these homes Willi appeal to empty nesters,- and others who would not likely generate a lot of traffic, with few families and children. Mr. Davis explained that the Plan Commission and the City arerequired by Ordinance to open Melark. Sue McMullen asked for an explanation t of what variances were obtained' at BZA. John Hart replied to this, explained that R-2 with variances seemed preferable to an R-4 zoning to accommodate neighboring areas. In case the project was not developed, the R-2 was,more.agreeable. CARMEL PLAN COMMISSION MEETING.MINUTES -JUNE 19,1990 3 Norman Taylor, Engineer from Woolpert Consultants, ,,spoke on the requested variances. Sidewalks will be on both sides in the building areas. Alan Potasnik asked about. density. In R -2 a density of 4.6 lots per, acre is permitted. Mr. Cunningham explained under R-4, 52 units are allowed per acre. Mr. Potasnik inquired about the pond, There is a retention depth of 2 -4 ft. After disch under Keystone, eventually would enter the Creek at Eden Woods, then to Cool Creek. Mr. Weaver described the proposed landscaping, with the effect of a canopy along the street. Mrs. Badger asked about an erosion control plan j during. construction. That has not been finalized yet. There is no maintenance on the property at the present time Mrs. Badger asked the subdivision committee to specify that requested variances run with Eaton Lauth Community Development Company only. Mr. Houck questioned mounding on the north east lots abutting Keystone, and fencing atop mounds. There is no planting on the Keystone side. Mr: Houck expressed the feeling that a sterile fence may not, be an appealing sight along a major thoroughfare. Mrs. Badger mentioned 431 Overlay restrictions, and. Mr. Cunningham pointed out some of the restrictions that have been varied for this project (8.4:2;, 8.4.3;, 8.4.4;, 8:4.6;, 8:4.7;, 8.4.9; and the Keystone Overlay Zone. There is a preliminary erosion control plan on file.: Mr.- Potasnik asked about proposed ,Mound and. wondered what the. vote was when variances were granted Mr Cunningham said they were approved 4-0. Mrs. Badger recommended that in the committe meeting; ti the motion be specified that the street going to the north 'not be opened until the develpment is completed. Mr. ,Davis suggested that due to the sensitive nature of this project, the committee be very specific about landscape plans,that more detail= is needed to .shield and protect others, especially on the north side, and including fencing and mounding on Keystone. The, landscape plan becomes very sensitive at this point. We realize that all landscape plans show an area in the best light, and that the finished product doesn't always look like the initial plans. This will be the first item at' the Subdivision Committee on July 3 in the Meeting Hall. Interested members of the public are welcome then. I CARMEL PLAN COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JUNE 19, 1990 4 2g. Commission to consider Docket No 31-90 PP, a primary plat application for Timber Crest Bend subdivision. The Primary plat consists of 5 lots on 5.89 acres of land located on the north side of 126th Street, approx. one half mile east of Gray Road. Site is zoned S-1 residence district. Petitioner request 'primary plat approval to subdivide the property into 5 single family residential lots. Filed by Thomas C. Barnes. Mr. Davis excused himself from this project due to a posible conflict of interest Sue McMullen will conduct. The public hearing opened at 8:15 P.M. Stan Neal, Weihe Engineers, 10505 N. College, Indpls., made the presentation, a copy of which is on file at the Department of Community Development. Thomas Barnes was also present. There were no questions frorn'the public. The public :hearing closed at 820 p.m: There being no questions from the Plan Commission members, this item will proceed to the Subdivision' Committee as Item 2, on July 3 in the City Meeting Hall. 3g. Commission to consider Docket No 39-90 OA, an ordinance amendment to Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance Z-160, this amendment is to amend sections 5.3.2, 6.32, 7.3.2, 8.3.2, 9.32, 10.42, and 16.3.2 of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. This is to amend the sections requiring a 6 foot fence to surround a swimming pool. Filed by the Carmel/Clay Plan Commission. The public hearing opened at 8:21p.m. Mr. Cunningham explained the current ordinance requirements, and the proposed change, eliminating the 6' fence recuirement., Teresa' Langenskamp, 12871 Northants Circle spoke against removing the 6 foot fence requirement. 'Materials were distribUted-,ii',td: Plan Commission members.' Ms. Lengenskanip pointed otg'NiariciuOtidt0 601:0001 in theie materialei and itreed the safety factor bv 010106'tioiii,60refer* titi a probable iwtoviolotiofeesiof,hoyor*liew'' a pool cover has to be closed;44nee:delavers'ofdrottiction, and the more barriers there 4 CARMEL PLAN COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JUNE 19, 1990 are, the more accidents can be prevented. There are inadequacies in allowing a pool cover, among them the fact that a pool cover is not a permanent barrier., Why whould we change something that is working? The fact that there have been no drownings was pointed out in her statistics. The public hearing closed at 8:40 pm. Mr. Potasnik asked that we have the Marion County ordinance available at the Land Use committee meeting, and thanked Ms. Langenskamp for her efforts. Someone in the audience said that Marion County recently changed its ordinance back to its original form. That will be checked on. Mr. Fleming pointed out numerous comments he has received from others, stressing safety and urging that we keep a fence requirement around pools. Mr. Davis explained that in granting variances by the BZA, landscaping was only considered visual buffering, and was not ever intended as a safety item. Mrs. Badger invited Teresa to the Land Use committee meeting. This will be the first item of business before that committee on July 3. Mr. Blackwell commented that knowing where our children are at all times is one of the best deterrents to drownings.' 4g. Commission to consider Docket rezone application for 39.68 acres of land located orraciutheairaorner of Old Meridian Street and Smokey Row Road (136th Street). Site is currently zoned R-2 (Residential). Petitioner is requesting to rezone 27.04 acres of the property to B-6 (Entrance Corridor) for the development of a mental health treatment center and the future development of ancillary and auxiliary medical/health care facilities. Filed by James J. Nelson for Pro-Med Limited. Jim Nelson, 3663 Brumley Way, Carmel, IN representing the applicants, Pro Med, Ltd, Owner and Tri-County Center, Inc, the contract purchaser, made the presentation, a copy of which is on file at the Department of Community Development He was assisted by Chris White of Paul I. Cripe, Inc. The public hearing opened at 8:45 p.m. The presentation included site plans, explanation 'of compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, description of each of the 6 parcels with present and future views of the parcels. He also explained the tree preservation program (to preserve all trees CARMEL. PLAN COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JUNE 19, 1990. 6 with a diameter of 10" or more). It also includes a minimum; of 30' greenbelts along a portion of the south, east, and north perimeters by Smokey Row Rd. and Old Meridian. Larry Birch, Executive Director of Tri County, a not for profit corporation, described the comprehensive range of mental health services provided by Tri- County. The Mental Health facility is proposed as a two story structure, 80,000 sq ft. with 40 patient beds, and the petitioner will be back later for ADLS approval on it There are proposed substantial offsite improvements, roadway, etc. Bill Fehribach (traffic analysis) addressed materials distributed by Chris White at this time. Larry Ulrich, administrator at the St. Vincent Stress Center, spoke in favor of the project, indicating that some of the people served could very well be in this room. Nancy Blondin, Executive Director of the Carmel /Clay Chamber Commerce, 3241 E. IO6th St indicated this would be'an appropriate addition to the community: Also, the economic impact could be great, and the full range of services could be. advantageous: David Taylor, 503 First AV SE, said mental health has received a lot of publicity. Many companies are contracting such services, this would offer opportunities to businesses in Carmel, including the high school, and would be an asset to the community. Mr. Dick Bird, 90 Rogers Rd, Woodacre West, backs up to the property line, and he had questions on internal security on the grounds, the time frame for the remainder of the property, parcel 6 (pond-and park), whether wildlife would be retained. Frank Holland, 20 Wildwood Dr., said he had had a good meeting with Mr. Birch, would like to meet re: aesthetics and security, open spaces (wants definition), wonders if there is a covenant to stay B -6, and not go to some other use Will petitioner request annexation to the City of Carmel? Are there wetlands on the property? Richard J. Reilly, 87 Rogers Rd., said Cool: Creek and another creek converge, on his property. There already,exists a drainage problem with floods of 41/2 5 ft. Also, how much staff would be there at night to oversee patients: Steve Harlow, 4609 Somerset Way 5., Carmel,: representing Ken Sebree, owner and developer of adjacent property, expressed concern with the development of parcel 2. He questions 4 story buildings, would request the Plan Commission restrict height. He questioned the cut for an entrance near .Kensington, would like a buffer of 50 ft. around the property., He also asked for an explanation of how the park is proposed, _-what setback froth property line (60 ft, per Jim Nelson, in B -6). Mr.'Harlow would like it to be CARMEL PLAN COMMISSION 'MEETING MINUTES JUNE 19, 1990 7 100 ft from property line. Also, is there` room for expansion in future? If so, what kind? Al Decker, 67 Woodacre, questioned drainage. Betsy Lasky, 11 Wildwood Drive, agrees with Mr. Harlow, wants structures limited to 2 stories. She indicated Wildwood residents would appreciate a meeting re: fencing. The public hearing closed at 9 :45 p.m. Mr. Chris White explained the conceptual drainage plan: He said there is reason to expect improvement in adjoining areas re: drainage. Mr: Reilly asked about any recourse if there is NOT improvement? Mr. Davis pointed out there is always recourse, and advised that this is only a conceptual drainage plan at this `point. Drainage will require approval bT the County Surveyor's office, according to Mr.White. Mr. Birch addressed security, and indicated a willingness, to work on the fencing. As far as internal security, there would be two RN's, 4 psychiatric technicians, and additional security. This would be a minimal staffing pattern. Mr. Nelson agreed to install a fence between the facility and the south property line. If the Land Use committee wants a commitment not to rezone again, that would be all right. He felt that 4 story buildings are appropriate, asked that others consider Kensington Place "nearby.: With the quantity- of trees set aside, there is a lot of natural screening. No portion of this site is designated as wetlands The Tri County facility will. be two stories in height; is planned to not exceed 30' in height There are no plans for the creek. A passive recreation area for patients is being considered in the "selective clearing area." Mr. Nelson also indicated petitioner is not opposed to annexation: Mr. Houck asked if there would be more than one phase in the building? That is not anticipated. If it did happen, an addition would likely be for out- patient use purposes. Mr. Potasnik asked about use Mr. Bird's response was that 20 beds are for more serious disabilities, and the average stay is 15-18 days. Admittance is usually stress related. They do receive some court ordered patients, perhaps 15 -20 Mrs. Ogle asked about the rectangular sign area.. (Parcel 2) and Mr. Nelson replied that it is encumbered by rights -of -way and not suited for development, has been designated as Sign area. CARMEL PLAN COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JUNE 19, 1990 8 Mr. Davis asked about the park. If deemed apropriate, the petitioner would be willing to dedicate the park to the city. This item will go to the Land Use Committee on July 3. Commission to consider pocket No 44-90 Z, a rezone application for 5 acres of land located at 1139 South Rangeline Road, Carmel. Site is currently zoned R-2 (Residential) and B-3 (Business). Petitioner is requesting to rezone to B-8 (Business). Filed by James J. Nelson for Executive Commons, Inc. Mr. Jim Nelson, 3663 Brumley .Way, representing Mick Sheetz of Executive Commons,Mrnade the presentation, a copy of which is on file at the Department of Community Development. The public hearing opened at 10:20 p.M. Mr: Nelson explained the reason for'' the rezone request is to enable a unified development of parcels, totalling approx 20 acres., and there would be 2 points of access. The'public hearing closed at 10:28 p.m. Donna Judd, 21 Shoshone Dr., acknowledged that she was attracted by the natural beauty of the area, would not like to see commercialization in this area that makes Carmel unique. Buffering, per Jeff Re buffering, there is no development plan prepared at this time, a 30 foot greenbelt will be part of that plan. Mr. Nelson explained that the uses in B-3 and B-8 are the same, but there is a procedural difference between the two zoning classifications. This will go to the july 3 committee meeting. The public hearing closed at 10:35 p.m. H. OLD BUSINESS .1h. Commission to consider Docket No 26-90 Z, a rezone application for Grace M. Worley. Petitioner requests approval to rezone her property from S-1 residence district to B-7 neighborhood business didtrict. Site is located approx. 200' west of North Augusta Drive on the north side of 96th CARMEL PLAN COMMISSION MEETING-MINUTES JUNE 19, 1990 9 Second: Henrietta Lamb Street (lots 17 and 18 of North Augusta subdivision). Site consists of 1.18 acres. Filed by Sheila Marshall for Grace M. Worley. Ms. Sheila Marshall, Goofs,- Henke and Wheeler was present. Mr. Potasnik moved for move approval of 26-90 Z as presented: Mrs. Badger seconded. It was noted that the committee vote was 4-2. Ms. McMullen noted that committee comments fit B-7. Approval was unanimous:, 2h. Commission.to consider Docket. No: 27-90 PP, a primary plat application for Claridge Farms subdivision. The primary plat consist of 146 lots on 120 acres of land located on the west side of Clay Center Road, approx. one half mile south of 131st Street. Site is zoned S.1 residence district. Petitioner request primary plat approval to'subdivide the property into 146 single family residential lots. Filed by George SWeet for Sweet and Company. Mrs. Badger removed herself from this and the following item. Mr. Klar said the committee recommends adoption. Mr. Blackwell-seconded,approvaL Findings of facts were completed. Approved: unanimously. 3h. Cornmission to consider. Docket No. 28-90 PP, a primary plat application for Carwinion subdivision. The primary plat consists of 122 lots on 69.46 acres of land located on the west side of Shelborne Road, approx. one half mile south of 106th Street. Site is zoned S-2 residence district. Petitioner request primary plat approval to subdivide the property into 122 single-family residential lots. Filed by George Sweet for Brenwick Development Co., Inc. Mr. Kier moved for approval with the condition of the County Surveyor's final approval of plans. CARMEL PLAN COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JUNE I9, 1990 i0 'Finding fa facts were prepared. Approved: unanimously 4h. Commission to consider Docket No 29 -90 PP, a primary plat application for the Sanctuary subdivision. The primary plat consists of 14 Tots on 36.4 acres of land located on the southwest corner of 131st Street and Clay Center Road. Site, is zoned. S -1 residence district. Petitioner request approval to subdivide the property into 14 single family residential lots. The .petitioner is requesting the following Subdivision Regulations variances: 6.3.7 cul -de -sac length exceeding 600' 6.3.19 lots accessing directly to adjacent street 6.3.20 no private streets shall be platted 8.9 sidewalks on both sides of the street within the subdivision and along adjoining streets. Filed by Chris White for Will Wright Building Corp. *The petitioner has filed his secondary plat along with the primary plat application and is requesting simultaneous approval per section 5.1.15 of the Carmel /Clay Subdivision Ordinance. The docket number for the secondary plat is 43-90 SP. The Commission was advised to act upon each variance separately. 6.3.7. Mr: tdar moved the commission accept. Mrs. Bainbridge seconded. Findings of Fact: approved unanimously 6.3.19 Mr. bar moved to approve. Mrs. Bainbridge seconded. Findings. of Fact: unanimously approved. 8.9 Mr. bar moved to approve, Mr. Cunningham drew attention to Staff recommendation comments. Petitioner has committed to internal sidewalks. Staff wants sidewalks along perimeter as well Mr. Davis agrees with staff. Henrietta Lamb seconded. Findings of Facts:: 8-5 against this variance. Badger, bar, Ogle, Moore, Fleming infavor. 6.3.20 Mr. l lar moved for approval. Mrs. Bainbridge seconded. Findings of Fact: unanimously approved. P rimary Plat: Mr :14ar moved to approve the primary :plat ,including sidewalks on t he perimeter. Henrietta Lamb seconded. CARMEL PLAN COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JUNE 19, 1990 Vote: unanimously approved. Bill: Wendling acknowledged to Plan Commission members, that when they checked approval of Primary Plat; the condition of perimeter sidewalks is part of the Primary Plat. 5h. Commission to consider Docket No. 38-90 ADLS (Amend), and Architectural Design, Signage and Lighting (amendment) application for new office building located in the northwest quadrant of 1-465 and Meridian. Petitioner seeks approval to reduce a previously approved seven story building to a six story building (125,486 sq.ft.). Site is zoned B- 1. Filed by Kevin A. Miller for HRB Associates, LP. Mr. Moore moved for approval Mr. Blackwell seconded. Vote: unanimous 6h. Commission to consider 42-90 ADLS (Arnend), an Architectural Design, Lighting and Signage application for St Vincent's Hospital. Petitioner is seeking the approval to construct a 3950 sq.ft. addition to the south side of the existing hospital. The addition is to house a surgical department and a connecting walkway to the medical office buildings. Site is zoned B Filed by E. Davis Coots for St Vincent's Hospital. Sue McMullen removed herself from this project Mrs. Ogle moved for approval. Mr. Moore seconded. Mr. Moore suggested this project get with Mr. Jim Nelson (refer to previous project Tri -County Rezone) for fair share of the widening of Old Meridian.' Sheila Marshall said that is in progress. Staff recommendations were mentioned. Vote; unaniamous approval. 11 NEW BUSINESS Commission to consider Docket No 18-90 ADLS, an Architectural Design, Signage and Lighting application for 301 East Carmel Drive. Petitioner seeks approval, for the construction of two single story retail buildings (bldg A —10,200 sq.ft. and bldg. B-2,800 sq.ft.). Site is located a half mile west of Keystone Avenue on the south side of Carmel Drive, site of the CARMEL PLAN COMMISSION MEETING. MINUTES JUNE 19 1990 12 former Carmel Pint±- Putt, and is zoned B -8. Filed by Mark Boyce for C.P.Morgan Development. Mark Boyce, of C.P. Morgan, 1980 E.;II6th ST., made the presentation, a copy of which is on file at the Department of Community Development. Mr. Richard Henderson, Schneider Engineering, was also present. Presentation showed how a Retail center fits into the 6 acre development, development plan was shown. 2 -bldgs with building elevations,, lighting plan for the development. Mrs. Badger won owner: Ts.:: cornmunity. Mr. Potasnik asked if mechanical systems on roof are completely concealed? Mr. Boyce will check: The sign board is internally illuminated, and they anticipate 6-7 retail businesses ,to occupy structure. This project will proceed to the Industrial and Commercial Committee. Mr. Davis complimented Mr. Boyce on the plan. Commission to consider Docket No. 20-90 ADLS: (Amend), an Architectural Design, Signage and Lighting application for L M Lawn and Garden. Petitioner seeks approval for a time extension for the established 1344 sq.ft. garden mart for tropical plant and garden sales. Site is located at 2160 East 116th Street, Keystone Square Mall, just north of the existing MCL Cafeteria and west of Keystone Way, East, and is zoned B -8. Filed by Lloyd Long and Mike Baumgartner for L &M Lawn and Garden. Staff recommends suspension of rules. Mike Baumgartner, 29 S. Byron, Cicero, IN is asking for an extension for another 90 days. There have been no complaints on his operation. Mr. Potasnik asked if he will go through the procedure for a longer time next year He also wondered if Mr. Baumgartner will ask for another extension after this 90 days is up? Mr. Baumgartner replied that he intends to wait until next spring. h 'reply was y es, sales ax.,ar air toy .established businesses in =t CARMEL PLAN COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JUNE 19,1990 13 Mr. Houck moved to suspend the rules. Henrietta Lamb seconded. Unanimous approval. Mrs. Bainbridge commented that there have been a variety of people in this spot, and this man has maintained the property. Mr. Davis agreed with that. He has applied for a permit, also, where others have not. This person has been more responsible. Mr. Potasnik acknowledged he agrees with Mr. Davis. His concern is the long term temporary structures/uses. Vote: Against: 6 Aye, 7 Passes by I vote 3i. Commission to consider Docket No. 45-90 ADLS (Amend), and Architectural: Design, Signage and Lighting application for Lincoln Income Life Insurance Company. Petitioner seeks approval to construct a covered parking facilitylfor the 16 car executive parking lot. Site is located at 11825 North Pennsylvania and is zoned *B -2 (Business). Filed by Kevin Miller for. Lincoln Income Life Insurance Company. Kevin Miller, Browning Investments, subsidiary of Conseco, Inc.; made the presentation, a copy of which: is on file at the Department of Community Development. He gave a rendering of the proposed; parking -structure,- showed the- nature ofcarport, distributed pictures. Mrs.- Badger wondered .if the ;department •has reviewed this. The department: has no problems with it, will be 'of same material as building (architectural pre -cast concrete). Mrs. Badger moved to waive the rules and act on this petition. There was unanimous approval of that motion. Mrs. Badger moved for approval of 45-90 ADLS, as submitted. Mrs. Bainbridge seconded. Vote: unanimous approval. 4i. Commission to consider Docket No. 46-90 FDP /SP, a Final Development Plan and Secondary Plat application for Technology Center Associates. Petitioner seeks approval to construct a single story, 62,000 square foot office /warehouse facility. Site is located at 801 Congressional Blvd. and is zoned M -3 (Manufacturing). Filed by Jim Nelson for Technology Center Associates. CARMEL PLAN COMM1SSION MINUTES- JUNE 19, 1990 14 Jim Nelson, 3663 Brumley Way, made the presentation, a copy of which is on file at the Department of Community Development. The location a 6 acre parcel on Congressional Blvd and 122nd St., near the Wholesale Club. He presented the final development plan for the office/warehuse, designed to mirror the 701 building. Mr. Potasnik indicated the staff recommends this proceed to the Land Use committee, but secondary plat approval requires consideration by the subdivision committee. Rather than try to accommodate a joint meeting of Land Use and Subdivision committees, Mr. Klar moved for approval of the secondary plat. Mrs. Badger seconded the motion. There was unanimous approval. 51 Commission to consider Docket No. 47-90 ADLS, an Architectural Design, Signage and Lighting application for Carmel/Clay School Corporation. Petitioner seeks approval of the landscaping within the 120 foot Keystone Avenue Overlay Zone. Site is located on the northwest corner of Smokey Row Road (136th Street) and Keystone Avenue and is zoned R-1 (Residential). Filed by Tim Stevens for Carmel/Clay School Corp. Bill Wendling, Attorney, requests that legal questions on this petition be addraessed to staff or Steve A6drews. Tim Stevens, Land Use consultant, Campbell Kyle Proffitt, 198 S. 9th St, Noblesville, made the presentation of the athletic field at the 56 acre site on the west side of Keystone, in the Overlay Zone, including a site plan, a copy of which is on file at the Department of Community Development. CARMEL PLAN COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JUNE 19, 1990 15 Mr. Moore seconded. Mr. Blackwell asked if the landscape is for aesthetics only.. It is,a visual buffer primarily, there is likely no hope of shielding lighting. Ms. McMullen moved to approve 47-90ADLS. Henrietta Lamb seconded. Ron Houck asked about areas that will not be screened. It was confirmed that there will be permanent bleachers in the facility. Unanimous approval. 6i. Commission to consider 48-90 ADLS (amend), and Architectural Design, Lighting and Signage application for Coots, Henke Wheeler. Petitioner is seeking the approval to place a. sign at 255 East Carmel Drive. Site is zoned B-6. Filed by Sheila Marshall for Coots, Henke Wheeler. Sheila Marshall, 255 E Carmel Drive, said this was denied by the BZA, made the presentation, including an artist rendering of the ground sign, which would be of limestone (similar to the Wedgewood sign), a copy of which is on file at the Department of Community Development She indicated it is compatible with other ground' signs along 'Carmel Drive. Landscape alterations,includelelocating one existing tree: Mr. Blackwell asked about ground lights within the shrubbery to illuminate the sign. This will proceed to the Industrial and Commercial Committee. Confirmation was given that the committee meetings on July 3 will be in the City Meeting Hall, and that the July 17 Plan Commission meeting will be in the new City Hall. 7i. Commission to consider the following ordinance amendments to the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance Z-160 as amended to the following proposals: 1. outside storage and display report from Industrial and Commercial Committee no report CARMEL PLAN COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JUNE 19, 1990 16 2. satellite dish and antennas report from Industrial and Commercial Committee being prepared for public hearing 3. Plan Commission Rules of Procedure report from the Executive Committee being prepared for public hearing 4. Garage Size being prepared for public hearing 5. Additional height for setback being prepared for public hearing 6. Cluster Mr. Blackwell is committee chairman.. There is lots of public_ interest Caroline Bainbridge and Ila Badger are additional Plan Commission members, there are two members of a development company Mr. Davis has asked. Names of others are being referred to Mr. Blackwell, and a they would like a staff person on the committee as well. Mr. Blackwell can structure the committee. 7. Comprehensive Plan Update There will be no further public comment at the committee level. The rest of the meetings should go on expeditiously. There should be one more meeting. Other public comments will be at City Council. 8. Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Regulations recodification In a communication from Mr. Bucher, it is indicated that the recodification of the Zoning Ordinance being done by Steve Granner of Bose, McKriney Evans, to update it to current state code is over half done, and is on hold awaiting executive committee direction. The Executive CommitteePWnO.,rsasoR to prpReadyntiL:„ The City Attorney 0:1610e#**!00101;`/c.?i ihdra.atei*h660 be tee0i■iiit sometime in CARMEL PLAN COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JUNE 19,1990 17 July a copy of the recodification contracted to the South Bend firm (to recodify the entire city ordinance, including the zoning ordinance). 9. Plan Commission Rules of Procedure nothing to report from the Executive Committee. Sharon .Clark expressed ..her appreciation at being a liason from the county, complimented staff, and reported that the county is finished with their comprehensive plan, subdivision and zoning ordinances. Mr. Davis entertained a motion to adjourn. Mr. Blackwell so moved. Mr. bar seconded. The meeting was adjourned at 11:55 p.m.