HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings of Fact CARMEL /CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
FINDINGS OF FACT for USE VARIANCE
Docket No.: l 3 ao 7 te
Petitioner: Leo E. Lichtenberg
1. The grant of this variance will not be contrary to the public interest, due to the existence of special condition(s) such
that enforcement of the zoning ordinance will result in unnecessary hardship because:
surrounding uses are commercial in nature. In addition, the comprehensive plan
indicates an employment node (commercial development), and the critical node study
for 96th and Westfield areas indicates commercial development.
2. The grant of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the
community because:
the planned real estate office will not increase the traffic counts for the area
I currently have only one employee and the operational are generally 8 -5.
3. The use or value of the area adjacent to the subject property will not be substantially affected in any adverse
manner because:
the uses are similar in nature.
4. The need for the variance arises from a natural condition peculiar to the subject property because:
the surrounding properties are commercial office. Also it's a chance to
bring jobs back to Carmel.
5. The granting of this variance does not substantially interfere with the Carmel /Clay Comprehensive Plan because:
the granting of this use variance is commensurate with the comprehensive
plan
DECISION
IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Use Variance Docket No.
is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board, whichare incorporated
herein by reference and made a part hereof.
dopted this v+ day of I I 20
-1 2421) Z 1
C" 'PERSON, Carmel/Cla oard of Zoning Appeals
SECRETARY, Carmel /Clay toard .1 Zoning Appeals
Conditions of the Board are listed on the back.
Page 10 of 9 filename: use variance application 2011.doc rev. 12282010
CARMEL /CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 7 REGEI
BALLOT SHEET for FINDINGS OF FACT USE VARIANCE 1 1 VED
520 11
Docket No.: O 30 O C "7 Lf DOGS
Petitioner:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
DATED THIS 2 DAY OF 44', l 20 L
Board Member
Page 9 o19 filename: use variance application 2011.doc rev. 12/28/2010
CARMEL /CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
BALLOT SHEET for FINDINGS OF FACT USE VARIANCE
RFC
Docket No.: 0 3 O C� U 7 e--( -f 5 "t0
Petitioner: r_o -/c e DOC X 11
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
DATED THISZ5 DAY OF 20
Board Member
Page 9 of 9 filename: use variance application 2011doc rev. 12282010
CARMEL /CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
BALLOT SHEET for FINDINGS OF FACT USE VARIANCE
Docket No.: //0.3000 7 L( t/
Petitioner;
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
DATED THIS DAY OF 4 20 0
Board Member
Page 9 of 9 filename: use variance application 2011 doc rev. 12282010
CARMEL /CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
FINDINGS OF FACT for USE VARIANCE
Docket .No. l/ O 3 CEO U 7 LC V
Petitioner: Leo E. Lichtenberg
1. The.grant of this .variance will not be contrary.to the public interest, due to the existence of special condition(s) such
that enforcement of the zoning ordinance will result in unnecessary hardship because:
surroundinq uses are commercial in nature. In addition, the comprehensive plan
indicates an employment node:(commercial development):, and the critical node study
for 96th`and Westfield. areas indicates commercial development.
2. The grant of this variance will- not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the
community because:
the planned real estate office will not increase the traffic counts for the area
I currently have only, one employee "and the operational are generally 8 -5.
3. The use or value of the area adjacent to the subject property will not be substantially affected in any adverse
manner because:
the uses are similar in nature.
4. The need for the variance arises from a natural condition peculiar to the subject property because:
the surroundinq properties are commercial office. Also., it's a chance to
bring jobs back to Carmel:
5. The granting of this variance does not substantially interfere with the Carmel /Clay Comprehensive Plan because:
the granting of this use .variance is commensurate with the comprehensive
plan
DECISION
IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning.Appeals that Use Variance Docket No.
is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board, which are incorporated
herein by reference and made a part hereof
Adopted this day of /'Ptie 200
CHAIRPERSON, Carmel /Clay Board of Zoning Appeals
SECRETARY, Carmel /Clay Board of Zoning Appeals
Conditions of the Board are listed on the back.
Page 10 of 9 filename: use variance application 2011.doc rev 12282010