HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes BZA 11-23-92 87
Board of Zoning Appeals Minutes
November 23, 1992
The meeting was called to order with the Pledge of Allegiance at 7:00 PM by Richard Klar,
Chairman, at the City Council Chambers.
The Board Members present were: Gail Bardach; Ron Carter; and Alan Klineman. A quorum
was declared.
Staff present: Mike Hollibaugh; Terry Jones; and Steve Brown, City Attorney.
Gail Bardach moved to approve the minutes of the meeting of September 28, 1992, subject to
the following correction: on page 4, the next -to -the last paragraph should be changed to reflect
the correct spelling of the petitioner's name as Dan Follis, rather than Dan Foils. Gail Bardach's
motion to approve the minutes of September 28, 1992 was seconded by Alan Klineman,
unanimously approved.
Gail Bardach moved to approve the minutes of the meeting of October 26, 1992, seconded by
Alan Klineman, unanimously approved.
Item lg. Docket No. SU- 23 -92, a Special Use Application for Dr. Perez and their property
located at 1523 West 131st Street, Carmel. This public hearing was opened and continued from
the August meeting. The petitioners are requesting special use approval to construct a pond and
drainage facility improvements. The parcel is zoned S -1. Filed by Dr. Perez, presented by E.
Davis Coots.
Mr. Coots explained that the special use application was to construct a lake of approximately 8
acres, a portion of which was built in 1987 when the home was originally built; no special use
was applied for at that time. The lake is excavated rather than dammed, and the excavated
material coming from the lake was mounded along the perimeter of the Dr.'s property for the
purpose of screening. The pond on site was done at the time of original construction and the Dr.
was said to be unaware of the necessity to apply for a special use for the pond.
Bill Kembly, engineer, made calculations necessary to establish that drainage across the Dr.'s
property would be unimpeded by the construction of the mounds along the north boundary of
131st Street and Hoover Road to the west. Two 30" reinforced concrete pipes were installed on
the Dr.'s property to gather water on the east side of Hoover Road ditch, funneled through the
mounds and picked up by the drainage system being calculated for purposes of constructing the
Claridge Subdivision to the south.
In regard to road setbacks and rights of way, both Hoover and 131st Street are county roads with
one rod width, 33 feet, 16.5' per half of center line; Mr. Kembly submitted a drawing showing
all earth work performed on the Dr.'s property as occurring more than 25 feet from the center
line. Mr. Coots stated that Dr. Perez was within his boundary and not in any way doing work or
bza 11-23-92 1
89
mounding on any county right of way, and that the request for dedication would be more
appropriate if this were a subdivision necessitating road improvements. Mr. Coots said that the
request to voluntarily "donate" additional rights of way along 131st Street and Hoover Road is
believed to be inappropriate at this time.
Public hearing closed.
Mr. Klar asked if there were approval letters from the County Highway, Surveyor's Office, and
Drainage Board. Mr. Coots responded that letters had been requested from Steve Cash and Kent
Ward indicating review of the plan and approving construction and compliance to date. Bill
Kembly wrote Steve Cash on November 20, 1992 confirming that plans have been approved,
work has been done, and that finished grading of the swale needed to be done, weather
permitting, along the east side of Hoover Road.
In response to Mr. Klar's question regarding flooding on the south side of 131st Street and the
farmland to the east, Mr. Coots said he did not believe anything that occurred on Dr. Perez's
property had an impact on the drainage along 131st Street or the legal drain that goes through
the front of Dr. Perez's property to the east. The mounding would prevent sheet drainage coming
from the north across the roadway onto Dr. Perez's property if it were obstructing, however, the
drainage swale (Elliott Creek) that goes across the front of Dr. Perez's property is open and that
is where drainage along 131st Street accumulates. Mr. Klar stated that that was the reason for
requesting the letters from the County Surveyor's office and Drainage Board.
Mr. Carter expressed concern that on May 1 lth, Dr. Perez was told of the need for a Special Use
Permit and on May 17th, he was told in writing that he needed to obtain permits and approvals,
and copies of the ordinance were provided to him. On May 22, there was another
communication in writing urging Dr. Perez to come into the Dept. of Community Development
and look at materials from past applications. On July 14, there was a phone conversation noting
that the application was not complete. On July 17, Dr. Perez was again written and urged to get
professional help on this matter. On July 20, Dr. Perez was written and a "stop work order"
issued.
Gail Bardach commented that Mr. Coots has had since August 14 to obtain approval and that
requested revised plans have not been submitted to either the County Highway Department or the
County Surveyor's office. Standing water was discussed as early as August 14, 1992.
Bill Kembly replied that the standing water was a pre existing condition and was not as a result
of the mounding done on Dr. Perez's property.
Alan Klineman stated that the mounds should be moved back approximately 15 or 20 feet and
an easy approach should be provided to the mounds rather than having the mounds look like a
wall as they do now. The neighbors are unhappy with the situation and Dr. Perez needs to rectify
it.
Mr. Coots stated that there was no ordinance in regard to the regulation of mounds as far as
bza 11 -23 -92 2
91
property lines, perimeters, height, etc. and that no ordinance has been violated -it is a matter of
aesthetics.
Gail Bardach moved to approve Docket No. SU23 -92, seconded by Ron Carter, motion denied
4 -0.
Item 2g. Docket No. V- 35 -92, a Developmental Standards Variance Application for J.A. and
Alice Rosenfeld and their property located at 10620 Winterwood Drive, Carmel. The Petitioner
is requesting a variance from section 26.2.19 (3) of the Carmel /Clay Zoning Ordinance to allow
a one foot encroachment of a building setback line as established on the recorded subdivision
plat. The parcel is zoned S -1. Filed by Jeannine DeRoy for J.A. and Alice Rosenfeld.
Jeannine DeRoy, 1530 Woodlake Court, owner and builder of 10620 Winterwood Drive, stated
that when the residence was built eight years ago, the corner of their garage was unknowingly
one foot over the Winterwood setback line from the street. Upon the sale of the house, the new
owners requested that the DeRoys obtain a variance, even though the title company insured it.
Ron Carter moved to approve Docket No. V- 35 -92, a Developmental Standards Variance
Application, seconded by Gail Bardach, motion approved 4 -0.
Item 3g. Public Hearing on Docket No. V- 36 -92, a Developmental Standards Variance
Application for Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc. and their property located in the
development known as Meridian at the Interstate with a common address of 10330 North
Meridian Street, Indianapolis. The Petitioners are requesting a permanent variance from section
17.1 of the Carmel /Clay Zoning Ordinance to allow a reduction in the number of required parking
spaces from 777 to 719. The parcel is zoned B -6, filed by James J. Nelson, attorney for
Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc.
Jim Nelson, 3663 Brumley Way, Carmel, represented Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc. Also
present were Bill Tornatore and Dave Arland of Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc., and
Michael Wells of Browning Investments, Inc.
The original plan to construct the office building, approved February 18, 1992, provided for a 4
story building consisting of 215,663 square feet in size and 720 parking spaces being provided,
719 were required. The add -on to the atrium area resulted in an increase in the number of
required parking spaces by 58. The atrium area is for aesthetics and display only and not as
occupiable office area, therefore, there is no need for additional parking spaces to accommodate
employees or customers because of the increased size of the atrium. Since additional employees
were not being added, there was no need for additional parking spaces; hence the request for a
Developmental Standards Variance to reduce the number of required parking spaces from 777
to 719, with 720 being provided.
Public hearing closed.
1
bza 11 -23 -92 3
93
Terry Jones of Staff stated that it was the Department's understanding that future additions to the
building would result in the requirement for additional parking spaces, subject to further review.
This point was understood by the petitioner.
Gail Bardach moved to approve Docket No. V- 36 -92, a Developmental Standards Variance
Application for Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc., seconded by Alan Klineman, motion passed
4 -0.
Item 4g. Docket No. UV- 37 -92, a Use Variance Application for Kathy L. Arsenault and her
property located at 411 North Range Line Road, Carmel. The petitioner is requesting permission
to add on 400 square feet of storage to a previously approved use variance (UV- 31 -91, date of
approval 7/22/91). The parcel is zoned B -5. Filed by Kathy L. Arsenault.
Kathy Arsenault, 411 Range Line Road, Carmel, requested permission to add 400 square feet to
her existing business (upholstery and fabric). The petitioner's business has done well and more
space is needed for storage; storage is presently off -site at an additional rental expense.
Public hearing closed.
The petitioner stated her awareness of the requirement of no outside storage on the property. The
petitioner is also aware of the fact that the approval is personal to her and her busies and not
applicable if the property were to be sold; a new variance would be required of a new business
owner, since the B -5 zoning does not allow for an upholstery business (legal but non-
conforming).
Ron Carter moved to conditionally approve Docket No. UV -37 -92 with the following provisions:
that there be no outside storage of materials or goods at any time; and that the approval be
personal to Kathy L. Arsenault only and the Use Variance would become null and void if the
property is sold or ownership changes. This conditional motion was seconded by Gail Bardach,
motion passed 4 -0.
Item 5g. Public hearing on Docket No. SV -38 -92 a Developmental Standards Sign Variance
Application for the North Meridian Associates and their property located in the development
known as One Meridian Park Place with a common address of 12220 North Meridian Street,
Carmel. The petitioners are requesting a variance from section 25.7.04 -lbii of the Carmel /Clay
Zoning/Sign Ordinance to allow for an additional identification wall sign. The Parcel is zoned
B -2 and is within the U.S. 31 Overlay Zone. Filed by R. D. Richardson for the North Meridian
Associates.
"Rusty" R.D. Richardson, 1535 Prestwick Lane, Carmel, Indiana, general partner of North
Meridian Associates, owner of One Meridian Park Place, requested approval for a variance to add
one additional identification sign to the office building located at 12220 North Meridian Street.
The sign would have no exposure to the residential areas located to the west of the building.
This building was originally approved in 1987 and at that time, approval was granted for a tenant
bza 11 -23 -92 4
95
identification sign located in the front of the building. In addition, permission was granted for
an additional project identification sign 24 square feet in size. The property sets back 210 feet
from the right -of -way of U.S. 31 and has a building frontage of 240 feet. The petitioner's
understanding under the ordinance is that if the sign area is approved, they would have a
maximum sign area available of 50 square feet. If approved, this sign will be granted to a tenant
who will be occupying approximately 15,000 square feet within a building of 29,600 square feet.
Public hearing closed.
Gail Bardach moved to approve Docket No. SV- 38 -92, a Developmental Standards Sign Variance
Application for North Meridian Associates, seconded by Alan Klineman, motion passed 4 -0.
Item 6g. Docket No. V- 39 -92, a Developmental Standards Variance Application for Dieter G.
Puska and his restaurant, The Glass Chimney, located at 12901 Old Meridian, Carmel. The
Petitioner is requesting a permanent variance from sections 14.3.3 of the Carmel /Clay Zoning
Ordinance to allow a building and all extensions of or additions thereto to be located up to three
(3) feet from the north property line, and subsequently a variance from section 30.5.5 of the
Carmel /Clay Zoning Ordinance to permit the aforementioned variance request, if granted, to run
in perpetuity.
The parcel is zoned B -3, filed by James J. Nelson, attorney for Dieter G. Puska.
Jim Nelson represented the petitioner, Dieter G. Puska. The building which houses the Glass
Chimney Restaurant is presently leased from Design Gallery Group No. 2. Dieter Puska's intent
is to purchase the building as well as the land surrounding the Glass Chimney Restaurant;
however, Mr. Puska, as well as his prospective lender, would like to be assured that the parcel
will meet the side yard set -back requirements of the B -3 business district classification. Mr. Puska
would like to have the assurance that possible future expansion to the north would be feasible
without having to obtain an additional variance.
Adjacent to the south of the Glass Chimney is an undeveloped parcel of real estate owned by
Flanner Buchanan Mortuary and presently zoned R -1 Residence. It is possible that a zoning
violation would occur when the Glass Chimney parcel is carved out and created as a separate
parcel for the purposes of transfer of ownership. The Design Gallery and the Glass Chimney are
separated by .3 feet and it is within the .3 feet that the north property line would be created for
the Glass Chimney parcel. In order to accommodate this transaction, it is requested that a
Developmental Standards Variance be allowed to permit the side yard requirement along the
north property line to be .3 feet from the western most boundary to the eastern most boundary.
Also, under section 30.5.5, a variance granted by this board of a developmental standards nature
must be part of a project in which construction commences within one year after the grant. At
present, there is no project anticipated and therefore nothing to tie -in with the one year date; as
a result, the variance is requested to permit minimum side yard variance to run in perpetuity with
the real estate.
bza 11 -23 -92 5
97
Gail Bardach moved to approve Docket No. V- 39 -92, variance 1, seconded by Ron Carter,
unanimously approved.
Gail Bardach moved to approve Docket No. V- 39 -92, variance 2, seconded by Ron Carter,
unanimously approved.
Terry Jones of Staff inquired about a December meeting, inasmuch as it would conflict with the
Holidays. There was discussion from the Board which resulted in the decision that the December
meeting would be left open; if nothing is filed, the meeting will be cancelled.
Gail Bardach moved to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Ron Carter, unanimously approved.
r
..chard Klar, 1 es' ent R. ona Hancock, Secretary
bza 11 -23 -92 6