The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCorrespondence Conn, Angelina V From: justinmoffett @aol.com Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 5:11 PM To: Conn, Angelina V Cc: Hollibaugh, Mike P Subject: Re: Cobblestone Elevations Regarding the Garriott house, I think adding some sort of vent detail on the north side is easy to do. Just didn't think it was necessary after we brought the roof line down and included all the board and batten. The windows on the front are a struggle for us. The overlay ordinance and the draft architectural guidelines have been met with the two window design, but even more, we just disagree that either of the DOCS suggestions are better. The three window concept is overpowering and takes away from the front porch and the two windows closer together do not look right to us, and that opinion is supported by everyone on our team and the client. We try to keep an open mind and listen to staff feedback (as noted by the lowering of the roof line and other window changes), but over minor issues like this we believe we should have some ability to have a preference as to personal taste. Further, windows are certainly important fora facade but we fight opposing battles with energy efficiency and good design. Our client is really frustrated with extra windows because he has invested a lot of money in upgrading to 2x6 walls with a superior insulation package and feels like that's being diminished by unnecessary windows. If it looked horrible we'd certainly understand your concern but don't believe this is one of those cases. As always, appreciate you working through this with us. Justin Justin Moffett The Old Town Design Group 317.966.2023 phone justinmoffett@aol.com Original Message From: Conn, Angelina V <Aconn @carmel.in.gov> To: Justin Moffett justinmoffett @aol.com> Cc: Hollibaugh, Mike P <MHollibaugh @carmel.in.gov> Sent: Mon, Jun 13, 2011 11:27 am Subject: RE: Cobblestone Elevations Justin We are close to approving this, but Mike's concern would be with the left/north elevation, with no creaks in the wall and no vents or windows around the dormer or garage door. and both our concerns are the garage windows facing the street. -Angie Conn, Planning Administrator From: Justin Moffett [mailto justinmoffettCthaol.com] Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 11:14 AM To: Conn, Angelina V Cc: Hollibaugh, Mike P Subject: Re: Cobblestone Elevations Does that mean no SDR decision on Garriott revisions? We'd like to get started. Sent from my iPhone 1. Conn, Angelina V From: justinmoffett @aol.com Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 11:55 AM To: Conn, Angelina V; Hollibaugh, Mike P Subject: Re: Docket No. Assignment: (SDR) CW Weidlers Addition, Lots 16 -17: Garriott Residence 11050016 SDR) Attachments: Coach Light_Garriott.pdf; Garriott ELVS.pdf; Garriott LOT 6- 9- 11.pdf Comments below and revisions attached. I think the biggest remaining discussion item is windows. We added the following: South Elevation- Window in office. Transom only due to desk/built -in configuration. No other windows can be added without redesigning the kitchen. North Elevation- Window added in tub area. No window is wanted by the client in the closet area. The lowered roof height and board and batten detail eliminated the need for and ability to install a window on the gable end. East Elevation- No changes. West Elevation- We have attached sample elevations of the various configuration options you suggested. The client only likes the two window configuration with the placement as proposed originally. When moved them closer together it looks odd and the three looks too busy to them This is not a cost decision, but a matter of the clients strong preference. Please let me know what other items you need from us. Thanks, Justin Moffett The Old Town Design Group 317.966.2023 phone justinmoffett@aol.com Original Message From: Conn, Angelina V <Aconn @carmel.in.gov> To: Boone, Rachel M. <rboone @carmelin.gov Blanchard, Jim E <JBlanchard @carmel.in.gov Mindham, Daren <dmindharn @carmel.in.gov Donahue -Wold, Alexia K <awold @carmel.in.gov Hancock, Ramona B <RHancock @carmel.in.gov Hollibaugh, Mike P <MHollibaugh @carmel.in.gov Keeling, Adrienne M <AKeelinq @carmel.in.gov Littlejohn, David W <dlittlejohn @carmel.in.gov Martin, Candy <cmartin @carmel.in.gov Mindham, Daren <dmindham @carmel.in.gov Stewart, Lisa M <Istewart @carmel.in.gov Tingley, Connie S <CTingley @carmel.in.gov Druley, Elizabeth A <edruley @carmel.in.gov Mishler, Nicholas F <nmishler@ carmel.in.gov> Cc: :sstinmoffett@ aoLcotm Sent: Fri, May 27, 2011 12:02 pm S b t Pocket No. S R) nW W i id ar: y t of 1 i: ar :oy 's "d ;#1 1105OO!€ SDR .rcis✓�H,'£:a. �T�.o- �:.G% z2`%s. ti •.s s a <.r -iF -£L:, .c,.. .s P'�..:r .fs.. +.s: z, ✓i�-s 7 Gs s c r j I have issued the necessary Docket Number for (SDR) CW Weidlers Addition, Lots 16 17. It is the following: Docket No. 11050016 SDR: CW Weidlers Addition, Lots 16 17: Garriott Residence (645 1st Ave NE) The applicant seeks site plan design review approval for a house with attached garage. The site is located at 645 1st Ave NE. It is zoned R -2 /Residence, within the Old Town Overlay Character Subarea. Filed by Justin Moffett of The Old Town Design Group. Justin can be contacted at 317 966 2023. I SDR Application Fee: $148.00 (already paid) Petitioner, please note the following: 1. This item does not require review by the Technical Advisory Committee. 2. Mailed and Published Public Notice does not need to occur. 3. Proof of Notice is not needed. 4. The Filing Fee must be paid before issuance of the Letter of Decision. (already paid). 5. This Item will be reviewed administratively. 6. Review comments are below: a. Attached is a .pdf with requested changes to the architectural building elevations, such as lowering the garage height, adding windows, adding a vent, etc. See revised plans. b. What is the proposed 'horizontal siding' material? Cement fiber board? Fiber cement plans labeled as such. c. You will most likely need to lower the building height. Chapter 23D.03.c.3.k states: "Buildings may not exceed the height of the tallest dimension of the nearest two Contributing Buildings by more than seven (7) feet." Measured contributing adjacent home to south and roof height is within 7' of that home. Also, we shortened the span of the garage roof which allowed us to lower it several feet and have less roof mass facing the street front. d. Please move the front building setback back to at least 23 feet, to fall in line with the average setback of the houses on the block, and to more closely match the site plan you presented to the BZA showing a 25 -ft front yard setback. Changed. e. Please show /label the 5 -ft side and rear yard building setbacks. Changed. f. Please provide the lot cover percentage, including the pavement and building footprint. Added. g. Please provide the lighting design details on any exterior light poles or wall sconces. Picture of porch and garage coach lights attached. h. Please provide the location and design details of any proposed fencing. N/A i. A landscape plan and tree preservation plan will be required as part 2 of this SDR application. Understood. j. Exterior colors for paint, brick and roofing will be required as part 2 of this SDR application. Understood. k. A Secondary Plat /Replat application still needs to be submitted, to combine these two Tots into one. Will submit by early next week. Angie Conn, Planning Administrator 2 •auo o ;ui s ;off om; asaq; auigwoD 'palliwgns aq spaau Ins uo!Teaudde leidaa /leid AaepuoDas .O •uopeDudde ucs siq; jo z ;Jed se paainbaa aq ilinn Suva' pue >p!aq 'ivied ao4 saojoD ao!aaax3C3 •uo! e)udde vas siq; jo z ;Jed se paainbaa aq ii!nn uetd uoilenaasaad aaa; pue ueid adempuej v •2upuaj pasodoad Aue jo suelap Asap pue uoileDoi aq; ap!Aoad aseald •saDuoDs Hem JO salad 1.1.12N aoiaa ;xa Aue uo siiel.ap Asap 2upt4SH aqa. ap!Aoad aseald •1u!Jdlooj 2uipiinq pue luawaned aq; 2uipnpui 'a2eiivaaaad aanoD ;off aq; apinoad aseald ),j/ V •s pemas 2uipunq paeA aeaa pue apis aq; jaqei/mogs aseald peq;as pieA luoaj 1} -sz e Duimogs b'zo aq; paluasaad noA ueid ai!s aq; qD;ew Alasop wow o; pue 'ram aq; uo sasnoq aq; C; Jo peq�.as a�eaane aq; qlim au!I ui ��ej o ;'1.aa4 Ez;seal le al. peq ppeq�as 2uip�inq �.uoJJ aq; anow aseald/� „•laa} (L) uanas ueq; wow Aq sOu!pi!ne 2upngp ;uoo omn lsaaeau aq; jo uoisuawip ;sap; aq; j.o ;Aaq aq; paaDxa 4C) ;au Aew s2uipr8„ >1•E•D•£o•aEZ as ;degj •1g0!aq 2uiplinq aq; paau Akan .sow ilim noA dpaeoq aqin.uawa depalew ,2uip!s ieluozpoq, pasodoad aq; si le 9/79 •J2a 1uan e Suippe `smopuim Bu!ppe '1.14S!aq aSeae9 age 2uiaamol se gans'suouenala 2uipiinq leanpal.!qwe aq; sauew palsanbaa jpd• e s! VP :Moiaq aae si.uawwo3 ma!naa :asnoH ��oiaaeg