Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTraffic Impact Analysis rec'd 4-18-11 e c 1 A ENGINEERING CO LLC William J. Fehribach P.E. 8365 Keystone Crossing, Suite 201 PRESIDENT Indianapolis, In 46240 Steven J. Fehribach, P.E. (317) 202 -0864 fax (317) 202 -0908 ig VICE PRESIDENT MEMORANDUM DATE: 1/19/2011 TO: Charlie Frankenberger Nelson Frankenberger, PC FROM: Steven J. Fehribach, P.E. Amanda Johnson, E.I. RE: Traffic Impact Analysis 116 Street Spring Mill Road Comparison of Residential Uses and Proposed Development Uses A complete Traffic Impact Analysis was performed for a proposed development that is to be located south of 116 Street between Spring Mill Road and Illinois Street in Carmel, Indiana. The proposed development was divided into three phases with the final phase including every land use within the proposed development site plan. The total build out of the site, as proposed, will include retail, office and residential and uses. Within this memorandum, only Phase III of the proposed development (total build out) will be referenced. Currently, this site is zoned for single family residential land uses with a density of 2.4 dwelling units per acre. This memorandum will include a traffic impact comparison between the proposed development and the site that would exist with full build out under existing zoning. Intersection Analysis A capacity analysis was performed using the recognized computer program Synchro in order to determine the effects of the residential land uses and the proposed development on the existing intersections. Five scenarios were examined: Scenario I: Existing Traffic Volumes 1 Scenario 2: Existing Traffic Volumes Residential Traffic Volumes Scenario 3: Existing Traffic Volumes Proposed Development Traffic Volumes Scenario 4: Year 2020 Traffic Volumes Residential Traffic Volumes Scenario 5: Year 2020 Traffic Volumes Proposed Development Traffic Volumes The intersection of Spring Mill Road and 116 Street currently exists as a one -lane roundabout with a westbound right -turn bypass lane. The existing traffic volumes operate below acceptable levels of service with the existing one -lane roundabout. Therefore; Scenario 2 through Scenario 5 include converting the existing one -lane roundabout to a two -lane roundabout. This improvement is the minimum improvement necessary for the existing traffic volumes to meet minimum level of service requirements set forth by the City of Carmel. The intersection of Illinois Street 116 Street currently exists as a two -lane roundabout and all approaches operate above acceptable levels of service during the AM peak hour and the PM peak hour. When the generated traffic volumes from the residential land uses are added to the existing traffic volumes and the projected year 2020 traffic volumes, all approaches at this intersection continue to operate above acceptable levels of service. However, when the traffic volumes from the proposed development are added to the existing traffic volumes and the projected year 2020 traffic volumes, some approaches operate below acceptable levels of service and improvements are necessary. In order to obtain acceptable levels of service during the peak hours for Scenario 3 traffic volumes, the following improvements are necessary: The addition of a northbound right -turn bypass lane. In order to obtain acceptable levels of service during the peak hours for Scenario 5 traffic volumes, the following improvements are necessary: The addition of a northbound right -turn bypass lane. The addition of a westbound right -turn bypass lane. The intersection of 111 Street. and Spring Mill Road currently exists as a one -way stop control and all approaches operate at or above acceptable levels of service. When traffic volumes from either the residential land uses or the proposed development land uses are added to the existing traffic volumes, improvements will be necessary to meet the minimum level of service standards set forth by the City of Carmel. The acceptable levels of service can be achieved if a one -lane roundabout is constructed; however, the southbound approach may need two entry lanes to accommodate heavy 2 southbound traffic volumes and to prevent queuing into the adjacent intersection to the north. In addition, when Illinois Street is constructed to 103 Street, as per the Comprehensive Plan, traffic volumes will likely divert to Illinois Street and it can be expected that with the reduction in traffic volumes along Spring Mill Road, acceptable levels of service will be achieved at the intersection of 111 Street and Spring Mill Road without the implementation of a roundabout. Conclusions A preliminary capacity analysis has shown that the same improvements will be necessary at the intersections of 111 Street Spring Mill Road and 116 Street Spring Mill Road for both the proposed development traffic volumes and the residential traffic volumes. Improvements are necessary at the intersection of 116 Street Illinois Street when considering generated traffic volumes from the proposed development, but no improvements are necessary at this intersection when considering generated traffic volumes from the residential land uses as described in the Comprehensive Plan. 3