Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence: Baker Daniels 9-28-11Conn, Angelina V From: Pohlman, Jesse M. [Jesse. Pohlman ©bakerd.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 11:20 AM To: Conn, Angelina V Cc: Hancock, Ramona B Subject: Silvara 1 PC Committee Materials Attachments: PUD Ordinance_redline.pdf; PA Comparison Exhibit.pdf; Comp Plan Compliance.pdf Angie Attached please find the following for the October 4 th Plan Commission committee meeting: Redlined PUD Ordinance showing all changes made since the original filing; Planning Area Map comparison exhibit showing the changes to the Planning Areas (location, densities, uses) since the original filing; and A summary of the project's compliance with the C3 Plan. Hardcopies of the attached will be provided to go out with the staff reports the Department is sending out tomorrow. If anyone had an opportunity to review the redlined version of the ordinance we submitted prior to the last committee meeting and inquires as to what is different from that version, it should be noted the primary changes are: Reduced commercial down to 35,000 SF; Reduced overall number of units to 685; Elimination of apartment use (no longer permitted); and Added standards to newly added Exhibit L (active adult /empty nester standards). As a result, the other new changes in the redline generally are centered around the technical revisions to accommodate these modifications. If you have any questions regarding the attached, then please do not hesitate to contact me, otherwise we look forward to presenting these changes at the committee meeting next week. Thank you. Jesse JESSE M. POHLMAN LAND USE CONSULTANT T: 317.569.4836 1 F: 317.237.8476 1 MAIN: 317.569.9600 BAKER DANIELS LLP 1 WWW.BAKERDANIELS.COM CARMEL OFFICE (mailing address) 1 600 E. 96 STREET, SUITE 600 1 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46240 NOBLESVILLE OFFICE 1 23 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET 1 NOBLESVILLE, IN 46060 ATTENTION: To ensure compliance with applicable Internal Revenue Service Regulations, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this electronic message was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code. 1