Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacketCrooked Stick West, Lot 25 House Addition 2105 Pebble Beach Drive Docket No. 11100005 V VARIANCE CITY OF CARMEL, INDIANA November 1, 2011 Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals Hearing Officer Applicant: David Dyar, Owner Attorneys Nelson Frankenberger, P.C. Attn: James E. Shinaver, Attorney 844 -0106 Attn: Jon C. Dobosiewicz Land Use Professional 844 -0106 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Explanation of Request 2. Aerial Photograph Location Exhibit 3. Site Plan Exhibit Front Yard 4. Findings of Fact EXPLANATION OF REQUESTS David Dyar is requesting approval to allow a house addition at 2105 Pebble Beach Drive. The property is outlined on the aerial photographs included under Tab 2. It is zoned S -1 Residential. In order to allow a new house addition approval has been requested consisting of a developmental standards variance by the Board of Zoning Appeals. To this end, we will present the requests for development standards variances to the Hearing Officer of the BZA on November 1, 2011, just prior to the meeting of the Plan Commission Committees. The request for Variance approval involves one ordinance aspect; namely, the front yard setback. Included under Tab 3 is an exhibit illustrating that area of the house addition within the front building setback. 2011. Tab 4 of the information booklet includes the ballot sheet and findings of fact. We look forward to presenting this mater to the Hearing Officer on November 1, DYAR EXPLANATION Hearing Officer 010411 Respectfully submitted, James E. Shinaver Jon C. Dobosiewicz CARMEL ADVISORY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No.: 11100005 V Petitioner: David Dyar, Owner FINDINGS OF FACT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: The house addition is in keeping with the character of the existing residence. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: The house addition is in keeping with the character of the existing residence and represents a significant investment that will enhance the value of the property rather than present the opportunity for an advense impact on the value of adjacent properties. 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: The lack of a reduced building setback will prevent the owner from making a substantial investment on the property allowing for a use that is permitted under the Zoning Ordinance. DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals that Development Standards Variance Docket Nos. 11100005 V is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this 1s day of November, 2011. Hearing Officer, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals SECRETARY, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals DYAR Findings of fact Ballot sheet 110111