HomeMy WebLinkAboutDept Report HEARING OFFICER
CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
DEPARTMENT REPORT
April 26, 2004
l d. Brookshire Village, Lot 60: Kett Residence
The applicant seeks approval of the following development standards variance:
Docket No. 04030040 V Ch.8.04.03.D.1 rear yard setback
The site is located at 12547 Charing Cross Rd. The site is zoned R-2/Residence.
Filed by Gilbert Kett.
General
Information:
The petitioner
requests to build an
enclosed porch, where
the current patio
concrete slab is
located. The
ordinance states the
rear yard setback of a
structure in the R-
2/Residence zone
must be 20 feet from
the rear property line.
If built, the enclosed
porch will encroach
into the rear yard
setback.
Analysis'.
The petitioner has a unique situation where there is a mound and buffer yard created by the
commercial property to the east. The enclosed patio will compliment the existing architecture to create
a pleasing layout on the property. The back yard of this property cannot be seen from the property to
the east.
Findings of Fact:
1.) The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals,
and general welfare of the community because' The enclosed patio will not be injurious to
the community because this variance is to enclose a porch that already exists. This variance will
allow the proposed enclosed patio to be built in the back yard of this property.
2.)
The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be
affected in a substantially adverse manner because:
The use and value of the area adjacent to the property will not be affected in a substantially
adverse manner by allowing the variance for rear yard setback. The proposed enclosed porch
will be made of the same materials as the existing house.
The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in
practical difficulties in the use of the property because:
The strict application of the Zoning Ordinance may result in practical difficulties in the use of
the property due to fact that the enclosed patio will not be able to be built. The property owner
may have a hardship, due to lack of space inside the home.
Recommendation:
The department recommends positive consideration of Docket No. 04030040 V.