Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPetitions1542 Greyhound Pass Carmel, IN 46032 coO\¢ \c~eaS in actior~ ',, Enterprise~' (317)-587-1460 FAX (317)-587-1470 August 5, 1999 Mr. David A. Cremeans, President Carmel-Clay Plan Commission City of Carmel-Dept. Of Community Development One Civic Square Carmel IN 46032 Dear Mr. Cremeans: I'm writing this letter as the Chairman of the Reasonable Residential Roadways Committee (RRRC) of West Clay. R.R.R.C. is an unincorporated association of 450 petitioners with a focus on keeping the roadways in West Clay as a representative of the fine residential character of this lovely community. I'm enclosing a list of our petitioners who have been active in cooperating with the Hamilton County Commissioners and Hamilton County engineers along with the RRRC staff of lawyers, engineers, and architects in the redesign of the 106th and Towne Road intersection. I'm pleased to report the redesign was completed with both petitioners and the commissioners in a cooperative and participatory manner, which represented the best efforts of government and citizens coming together to develop constructive solutions for all concerned. Our commissioner, Sharon Clark, was a leader in this effort, and we owe her many thanks for all she did to produce this positive outcome. A copy of the petition concerning this effort is enclosed with correspondence pertinent to the petition effort. We currently have a petition reference our objection to the current Duke project at the quadrants of the U.S.31/I-465 intersection. We, RRRC, feel that the intersection is overdesigned resulting in a density which will cause serious spillover of traffic to West Clay roads and resulting in a negative effect to the keeping of the fine residential character of the West Clay community. The U.S. 31/I-465 section has been terribly neglected in the Duke study and this F/LOS intersection, without considerable improvement, will only worsen the current congestion of traffic caused by this F/LOS. Considerable engineering and construction expense would have to be done at this intersection and at the 96th Street section (College to Spring Mill) before any consideration for a redesigned petition from Duke should be made. I'm enclosing a study file used by RRRC to come to the conclusion to petition the Carmel Planning Commission to reject the current Duke petition for development of the quadrants. We, RRRC, would appreciate your review of the enclosed material with the commissioners and to vote No to Duke's current petition. I understand the Heartland Coalition has done an independent traffic study by Yarger Engineering at considerable expense, which also shows some of the same concerns the RRRC has presented. "Partners in Your Market Planning" Copies of the petitions reference the Duke matter from RRRC are enclosed along with a list of the petitioners to date, August 5, 1999. This petition has only recently been mailed to the 450 petitioners of RRRC and the response is growing daily. I thank you for all of your efforts to represent the community of West Clay in a fair and focused manner. Currently a consolidation study concerning the joining of West Clay with Carmel is under way. Nick Frenzel, Mark Ratterman, Jim Brainard, Sharon Clark and myself are the study committee appointed by the Original Clay West Information Council to bring this study to a positive conclusion. We personally feel the handling of the Duke project by the Plan Commission and the Carmel Council could be very important in the possibility of bringing the two communities together in a constructive relationship to form one great community. It will be necessary to recognize the differences between the West Clay community and the current Carmel community to make the consolidation work. Full recognition of the West Clay problems with the traffic effects of the Duke project will be essential to the building of a City of Carmel which includes the community of West Clay~ I would, as a representative of RRRC, be glad to make myself available for discussion of this important matter as our schedules make this possible. You may reach me at my corporate address. Once again, I thank you for your efforts as the President of the Plan Commission on our behalf. Carlyle A. Wilson II Chairman/CEO Bocar Enterprises (Representing RRRC) Copies: Jim Brainard-Mayor Nick Frenzel- Consolidation Committee Mark Ratterman - OCWlC Chairman Sharon Clark - County ConUmssioner Enclosures: Study file of Duke Project Current petitions and Petitioner Lists Copy of 106tlffrowne Rd, Petitioners CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS STEPHEN GOLDSMITH MAYOR June ! I, 1999 Mr. David A. Cremeans, President Carmel-Clay Plan Commission City'of Carmel Dept. of Community Development One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 Dear Mr. Cremeans: Thank you for allowing me another opportunity to address the Cannel-Clay Plan Commission concerning development along our boundaries. The City ofl. ndianapolis always maintains great/nterest in the future development of real estate adjoining its boundaries, and this case m particular presents s~gnificant land USe conflicts and traffic congestion hnpacts that spill over the boundary lines. Aga/n, as before, I fully intend to respect the w/shes oftbe Comnfission by relay/ng to you only new information. Of course I strongly encourage the Comm/ssinners and staffto rev/ew the information presented prev/ously to either the full Plan Commission or to the Special Study Committee° Therefore, with respec~ to the development proposal as presently outlined by Duke. Realty, I offer the foUow/ng commants and observations in the hope that the membem of the Commission w/llcontemplate these issues with the sincerest intent on achieving the greater good. for the entire metropolitan community: The proposed developmem (especially that anticipated for the SOuthwest quadrant) remains too dense. Presently, even after slight modifications in the general plans by Duke, the total square footage for this 35 acre parcel results in a development density (24,971 s.fJacre) that exceeds the densities of any other suburban office park in the metropolitan area, including Keystone at the Crossing (23,800 s.f./acre). Exhibit A compares the Duke project w/th several other suburban office complexes on the north side, including several in Carmel. It is painfully obvious that only a simtificant reduction in density w/Il effectively solve the land use and traffic conflicts associated w/th this project. I have compared Spring Mill Rd. with College Avenue to illustrate several key distinctions between these roadways (see Exhibits B, C, and D), Exhibit B demonstrates~at College Avenue serves as a primary, north-south link. betwean the primary job centers of Carmel and Indianapolis, w/th significant commercial nodes located at nearly every major intersection in between. By comparison, SpringTnii! DEPARTMENT OF METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT OIVISION OF PLANNING · ~,t I CITY COUNTY BULL... ~';G · 200 EAST WASHINGTON .STREET · INDIANAPOLIS, iNDl.t*'.,~ '~6204 :=HONE: i3"17) 327-5';St · lAX' :357~ 327-5~03 Letter to Mr. David A. Cremeans ( 06/I 1/99, page 2 Road neither links major job centers for the two communities, nor does it have even one commercial enterprise (much less any commercial nodes) along its entire length. Springmill Road is clearly a residential collector road',~ay, and this is supported further by the Marion County Thoroughfare Plan (Exhibit C) which appropriately portrays both Meridian Street and College as arterial thoroughfares, but not Springmill Road. Finally, a traffic count comparison is offered in Exhibit D, which substantiates that Springmill is clearly a less traveled roadway (50% fewer daily trips) than College Avenue. Of course the key to keeping unnecessary traffic offofSpring · :Mill Road remains making the 96~ Street/US 31 intersection work as efficiently as possible. Considered in concert with previously approved development for the northeast quadrant, Duke Realty's proposal will bring the four quadrants of the 1-465/MeHdian Street interchange to a total of more than three million square feet of commercial space. As illustrated in Exhibit E, this will be equivalent to relocating the four tallest buildings in the State to this one location. The significance of this point is that unlike Downtown Indianapolis where such concentrated development is appropriately served by a muiitude of interstate interchanges, arterial roadways, bus routes, and sidewalks, the sites under consideration for zoning by the Cannel-Clay Plan Commission are not well served by necessary.infrastructure (see F..xhibk E). Because it is a collector roadway, Springmill Rd. will not to be widened by Ind~anspolls to accommodate commuter ~affic. In fact, to improve public safety in the residential neighborhoods served by Springmill Rd., the City is explogng traffic · c~[mlng options which would slow vehicular traffic and improve pedestrian safety. Commercial developments approved by Carmel in the past for the same general area and which abut single-family residential properties were required under irrevocable commitments to dedicate far wider and better landscaped greeuspace buffers than those being proposed by Duke. Furthermore, as mentioned above these other projects are not as dense as the subject proposal, and most a~ no greater in density than I$,000 s.f. per ac-re. Although I have written previously to Mr. Rick Sharp asking that trat~ic access for the proposed retail center element of Parkwood East be re-worked to be~er relate to existing retail uses on adjoining properties, it appears that no attempts have been made by Duke to seriously examine this issue. I have had conversations over the past week or so with representatives of Indianapolis DCAM, Indiana DOT and the owners of the existing Kroger shopping center across the street, and all have indicated to me that no Duke representatives have approached them to discuss options for intersection realignment and'shared signalization at this location. Pleas~ continue to encourage the developer to work with representatives from the above listod agencies and the. I-I~milton Coullty Highway Department to work out an arrangement whereby a Letter to Mr. David A. Cremeans 06/! [/99, page 3 realigned,shared entrance drive might be developed by Duke across from a new I~ger Center access drive and using a single traffic si~al. At the request of the Special Study Committee, engineers from HNTB conducted a review of the petitioner's traffic study. Recommendations made by HNTB called for more specific assessmem by the petitioner's traffic consultant of the project's anticipated traffic contribution relative to the forecasted conlribution of nearby development, but they were not followed by the Special Study Committee. This · bversight should be corrected, and the traffic study should be appropriately amended as suggested by HIqTB. A prior commitment made by Duke when rezoning and developing the original Parlcwood East site suggests that no retail uses will be permitted other than what would be required to support the offices on site. The proposed 100,000 s.£ retail center at the southeast quadrant greatly exceeds any reasonable definition of"support retail". The Plan Commission should ask staffand/or counsel to advise as the applicability of the previous commitment, and then decide on the retail use accordingly. Regardless, the traffic should be realigned, as mentioned previously, so as to not adversely impact single-family residences across the street. Finally I just recently learned that the land owner in this case may have already been compensated in the past by the State of Indiana for damages (specifically the elimination of the real estate's commercial value) resulting from INDOT's most recent interstate interchange modifications at US 3 I. Consequently, it is possible that the land owner has already achieved the highest and best commercial use for the real estate through monetary compensation from the taxpayers of Indiana, and awarding the landowner commerdal zoning may contribute to a double jeopardy situation whereby the taxpayers may eventually be forced to compensate the property owner a second t/me for the same injury. The Plan Commission should make sure it fully understands the troth surrounding th/s issue before it considers approving the request for commercial rezoning, even in a less intense form. Again, thank you for listening and demonstrating a community.wide interest in the long- term effects this proposed development would generate. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions. Thomas M. Bartlett, AICP Administrator, DMD Division of Planning CC.' Mayor StePhen Goldsmith Mr. Eugene Lausch, Director, Indianapolis DMD Letter to Mt'. David A. Cremeans 06/11/99, page 4 ~ ' Mr. M. ike Graham, Washington Township Administrator, DMD Mr. Steve Cunningham~ Senior Planner, DMD Division of Planning Mr. Steve Engleking, Director, Carmel Dept. of C0'h~munity Development Ms. Ruth Hayes, Nora Northside Community Council EXttlrIIT A ! Comparison of Development Densities for Northside Commercial Office Projects SW Quadran! of "Parkwood West" le Crossing (north office park only) NW Quadra~)! ol~ "Parkwood West" Parkwood East (office park only) Methodist Medical Plaza. etc. Meridian) Plaza (office center) Wood[ield at the Crossing The Green. o~'~ Meridian (offices) 96lh & US 31 1-465 & Keystone 1-465 & US 31 96th & US 31 1-465 & US 31 103rd & US 31 & 86th 103rd & US 31 Dens 24,971 per ac 23,800 per ac. 24,360 per ac. 18,100 15,000 13,272 per ac. 12,358 10,156 page 1 Commercial Nodes College Avenue vs. Spring Mill Road Downtown Indianapolis · Small/Other Commercial Node Medium Commemial Node ,~ L al'ge Commercial Node Extra L~lrge Co~emi~l Node EXHIBIT C EXHIBIT D Traffic Counts: Springmill Rd. VS. Meridian Street and College Av. Mill Rd. Intersecting Street Count .116th ·. Data Avail. 106th .'-.. : ".." .' ' ' No Data Avail. 96th ? -" -10 090 . . 91.St . Latest 24 Hour Count Meridian Count Count ' Data Avail. No Data Avail. No Data Avail. No Data Avail. 31,75; 10,( 27,7441 19881'. 10,435t 1993 24,960t !9881 , 12,1.391 1993 25,1831 1'9881 1!,455t ,1993 25,1831 19881 11,4551 1993 24,~04J 19881 13,1901. 1993 NOTE: Adjusted average assumes a 3 percent annual increase in traffic. Indianapolis OMD. Division of Planning, 6111/99 EXHIBIT E Comparison of Development at 1-465 and Meridian S[reet with Downtown Indianapolis Bank One Tower ! 1,000,000 I fSE Quadrant I 1,100,000 AUL Tower i 692,000 j JSW Quadrant I 874.000, 'NBD Tower I 653,000 I iNE Quadrant ! 675,000 Market Tower 495,000 I JNW Quadrant j 47.5.000 TOTAL 2,840,000 TOTAL 3,124.000 I Arterial Roadways 24 Arterial Roadways i Interchanges 9 Interchanges ! 1 Bus Routes 321 JBus Routes 1 Indianapolis OMD, Division of Planning, 6111/99 BOSE McKINNEY & EVANS ATTORNEYS AT LAW Philip A. Nicely North Office Direct Oial (317) 574-3701 £-~V~afl: PNJce~y~bosefaw.com April30,1999 TO: Special Study Committee Members, President Cremeans and Staff Enclosed are our responses to all the questions which we believe were raised at the last Special Study Committee meeting concerning our rezoning petition at 1-465 and Meridian. We are providing this information to you prier to the meeting scheduled for next Wednesday so that you hopefully will have ample time to review and carefully consider our responses to the questions. If you feel that them are additional issues that we need to address at the meeting next Wednesday, please contact me at 574-3701 so that we may be prepared to respond to any additional issues that you deem appropriate to be considered. Very truly yours, Downtown * 2700 First Indiana Flaza · 1.15 Norlh Pennsylvania Street · Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 * (3171684-S000 · FAX (317) 684-5173 North Office * 8888 KeystonnOosslng * Sulle 1500 * Indianal:mlis. Imflana46240 · {317)$?4-3700 · FAX(MT)574-3716 w~ w.boseiaw.¢om DOCKET NO. 14-99-Z 1-465'& MERIDIAN ',~ SPECIAL STUDY COMMITTEE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS The following are what we believe to be all of the questions raised or asked by members ofthe Committee and for which the Committee wanted an answer. In addition to discussing the answers to each question, we have chosen to provide the Committee with a written response to each o.fthese questions recognizing that many petitioners would not want to do that. However, our goal is to move forward with a development that we feel is appropriate and that unquestionably will be a class development. We arsnot attempting to hide anything from the Committee, the Plan Commission or the neighbors. We have divided the questions into three categories: (A) Procedure; (B) Development, and (C) Traffic. A. PROCEDURE: Why isn't this case filed as a PUD? We discussed filing this case as a PUD and while a PUD would be an appropriate method with which to proceed, we elected not to do that for a number of reasons. First, the PUD Ordinance in Carmel is in its infancy stages and the PUDs that have been filed to date have not met with.overwhelming reception. Second, we believe that the development that Duke has done on the east side of U.S. 31, which was accomplished under the B6 zoning classification, has proven to be a first class development and is substantially like the plans that were filed at the time of the rezoning of the property and the approval of the preliminary development plan. Third, the adjacent neighborhood can obtain the same level of certainty in this development that a PUD would provide by proceeding in the same manner as DRLP did at Parkwood, i.e., through commitments and through the development plan approval process whereby the Commission approves the development plan, any amendments to the development plan, and also approves architectural, design, landscaping, lighting and signage before a building is constructed. (3) DEVELOPMENT: (1) Will there be a ddveway located or~..$pringmil/Road south of 1-4657 No, there will be no access from the development directly to Spdngmill Road. (2) What is the total square footage that will exist on the property south of 1-465 once the configuration for the modified 1-465/U.S. 31 interchange is determined? There are no definite plans for a change in the 1-465/U.S. 31 interchange. Letters from the Indiana State Highway Commission indicate that no proposed plan is in existence and the Highway Department is not interested at thls time in acquiring any property. As a consequence, we would assume that the square footage after any modification to the intemhange occurs would be the same square footage as is approved with this rezoning. Our amended proposal is to construct no more than 750,000 square feet of office on the south side of 1-465, plus a hotel and a couple of restaurants. On the southeast corner our proposal is to construct approximately 105,000 square feet of retail What square footage is proposed? When the traffic study was done, the traffic engineer based his study on the following square footages being developed: (A) 950,000 square feet of office on the southwest quadrant, plus a hotel and two free-standing restaurants. (B) 110,000 square, feet of retail on the southeast quadrant. (C) 375,000 square feet of office on the.northwest quadrant. The square footage which was proposed before the Plan Commission in the initial presentation was: (A) 850,000 square feet of office on the southwest quadrant, plus a hotel and two restaurants. (B) 105,000 square feet of retail on the southeast quadrant. (C) 375,000 square feet of office on the northwest quadrant. :.'ODi~,A~HODMA~IO 1;277t 7:2 -2- (4) Our proposal now, and for which we would be willing to execute a commitment, is as follows: (A) 750,000 square feet of office on the southwest quadrant, plus a hotel.and two restaurants. (B) 105,000 square feet of retail on the southeast quadrant. (C) 425,000 square feet of office on the northwest quadrant. What is the need for this amount of square footage and why is moving square footage to the northwest quadrant not reasonab/e ? The primary reason for the square footage is economic. The value of the ground is such that this amount of square footage is necessary to make the development work. However, in addition to the economic aspects, it is also to be noted the amount of the square footage and the location of the square footage is dictated by a number of other reasons. First, this ground sits at i-465 and Meridian, which is unquestionably the best property for office development in the metropolitan Indianapolis area. No more interchange property for class A office buildings exists. This is it. All other sites are secondary sites. Second, the southwest quadrant is easily accessible from the interstate and, in our opinion, has much better aCCess than the northwest quadrant, which has a single access point through the south end of the Meridian at 1-465 development. Third, the southwest quadrant is more rectangular in shape than the northeast quadrant and works well for development purposes. The site at the northwest quadrant is oddly configured and presents a challenge for development, especially for. development with multiple buildings. Despite those factors, after the last Committee meeting, we examined in detail the possibility of moving additional square footage from the southwest quadrant to the northwest quadrant as was suggested by some Committee members. With certain redesigns, we were able to accomplish that task and as a consequence have reduced the square footage in the southwest quadrant by 100,000 square feet and have, (5) with a new design for the northwest quadrant, moved 50,000 square feet to the northwest quadrant. Compare the density of Parkwood East with the proposed development. The following is a table which compares the density on a per acre basis of the existing Parkwood office development with the proposed development. Area Parkwood East (between College and Pennsylvania) Parkwood West Parcel 'A' Parcel Parcel 'C' Square Foob3qe Acres 1,050,000 58 Density Per Acre 18,100 (a) Office - 425,000 19.4 21,900 (a) Office - 750,000 (b) Hotel & Restaurants - 120,000 (c) Total: 870,000 36.4 23,900 (a) Retail - 105,000 10.4 10,100 Total Square Feet - 1,400,000 66.3 21,100 (6) Quality of buildings versus Parkwood East. The buildings to be constructed at Parkwood West will be equivalent to or better than the Parkwood East buildings. (7) (8) (9) Compare the berm and green area on Parkwood West lo what exists at Parkwood East. The distance from the odginal centedine (section line) of g6th Street to the parking lot for Parkwood East is approximately 102 feet. In that area, we have constructed a sidewalk and a 5-6 feet undulating mound. As we have proposed the development at Parkwood West, we have approximately 102 feet from the existing center line (section line) of 96~' Street to the parking lot (same as Parkwood East) within which we would propose to construct a sidewalk and a 5-6 foot undulating mound (same as Parkwood East) on which would be planted evergreen trees in the same manner as with Parkwood East, except that such trees would be 8' to 10' initially as opposed to 6' to What will be the timing of the construction of the berm? Construction of the berm will commence contemporaneously with the initial site development for the southwest quadrant and will be finished contemporaneously with or prior to the completion of the first building. Compare the building setback relating to the proposed development to that of Parkwood (and why). We will commit that the buildings in the proposed development will be set back a minimum of 220 feet from the now existing fight-of-way of 96a street. (Not applicable to the east 600 feet of the Real Estate). The Parkwood East commitments require that no office building may be constructed within 280 feet of the then (1989) existing right-of-way of96a Street. Thus, the office buildings in the proposed development could potentially sit 60 feet farther south than the Parkwood East office buildings are permitted to be located,-We believe this flexibility is necessary for several reasons. First, the proposed site has less depth than the Parkwood East site and has a different configuration which necessitates a location of the buildings slightly closer to 96th Street. Second, being cognizant that the Indiana Department of Transportation is studying a proposed interchange improvement for the 1-465 interchange (in approximately the year 2015) and that the INDOT staff engineers ara optimistic that there is a solution that will allow both the interchange and our proposed development to succeed, we feel it is prudent to provide some additional flexibility by locating the buildings slightly further to the south. Third, we are able to commit that the tree height at the time of planting for the trees to be located on the berm will be two (2) feet higher (8-10 feet) than the Parkwood East tree height (6-8 feet) commitment. (10) Wi//the parking areas be landscaped like St. Vincent's Hospital? Rather than say the parking lot will be landscaped like St. Vincent's Hospital (which we really don't know what that is other than to drive by and look at it), we would say that the parking areas will be landscaped in a manner similar to Parkwood East. (11) Specify sidewalk locations and provision of curb and gutter. (12) Attached as Exhibit A is a drawing which shows where we would anticipate along 96~h Street that the (i) right-of-way would be; (ii) the curb and gutter would be; (iii) the landscaping would be; (iv) the sidewalk would be; and (v) the Undulating 5-6 foot mound would be. (See also Item C,3). Address the Signature Building issue rela§ng to ~he northwest quadrant. We believe that the buildings to be constructed on the northwest quadrant will be signature buildings unless height is a person's only criteria for a signature building. If height is the only criteria for a signature building, these buildings may not qualify, however, in terms of design and other criteria for signature buildings, the buildings will be signature buildings. A couple of problems exist with constructing a building of greater height (from 10 to 15 stories). First, such a building would bring too much speculative space to the market (300,000 to 400,000 square feet) at one time. Historically, the north suburban market absorbs 400,000 square feet per year with approximately 100,000 to 125,000 square feet of the absorption coming along the U.S. 31 corridor. Thus, it would take 3-4 years to lease a 10 to 15 story building which would be in the neighborhood of 300,000 to 400,000 square feet. The interest carry on such a building to accomplish that task literally kills ::ODMA~V[HO DMA~NO1;27717;2 -6- the economics of such a building. Second, buildings which are greater in height than eight floors cost more to construct proportionately due to structural ahd safety issues that must be addressed. (13) Why have retail on the southeast quadrant? There are a number of reasons why retail is appropriate on the southeast quadrant. First, there is demand for high quality retail on the southeast comer, both by office tenants as well as by the general public. The Meridian business corridor from 86n Street to 131't Street is amenity deprived relative to the current (approximately 3.5 million square feet) and proposed (approximately 2.0 million.square feet) of office space. There is nearly a 12,000 person daytime workforce population along this corridor. This amount of daytime population requires retail shopping, service, and restaurant amenities. The southeast quadrant is the logical "bull's-eye' location to position these types of amenities for the corridor and .Duke's retail project will eliminate the need to have several .new amenity "nodes" dispersed along the Meridian corridor, which is a situation that the City of Carmel has determined to try to avoid per the Corridor Overlay Ordinance. Second, high-quality "Fortune $00" type office users seek locations which are driven by a mixed use equation. Duke's proposal satisfies this requirement by offering a retail, restaurant and hotel component. Duke's tenants Will not be the only beneficiaries; competing office projects and surrounding residential neighborhoods will have convenient and' easy access to this army of amenities. Third, from a zoning viewpoint, there is retail to the south, an intemtate to the north, office development to the east, and a six-lane divided highway to the west. Thus, from a pure zoning or land use viewpoint, retail is a logical use of the southeast quadrant. Fourth, Duke is committed to positioning a number of unique and higher end retail/restaurant concepts in the project. The best example ofthis is Whole Foods Market's commitment to our site. Whole Foods is the nation's largest chain of natural and organic food supermarkets with 85 stores in 18 states. 1998 sales'were above $1.1 billion. Whole Foods was ranked by Fortune Magazine as the 34n best companyto work for in America last year. Corporately, whole Foods (14) (15) paid over $36 million in taxes in 1997. In 1998, Whole Foods contributed to over 100 charitable organizations. Fifth, at only 105,000 square feet, the proposed retail project is small in scale and will likely only have from 12 to 18 tenants. The proposed retail development will generate less traffic in the A.M. and P.M. peak hours than what would be generated by offices that could be developed on the southeast quadrant under the current B-5 zoning. What is the height of all proposed buildings? (Does the Comp Plan only allow 4 stodes on the Southwest Quadrant?) The height of the buildings will be as follows: Building Type Top of Roof Top of Penthouse 3-Story 45 Feet 57 Feet 4-Story 57 Feet 69 Feet 5-Story 70 Feet 82 Feet 6-Story 83 Feet 95 Feet 7-Story 96 Feet 108 Feet The 1997 Amendment to the 1996 Carmel/Clay Township Comprehensive Plan for the U.S. Highway 31 corridor recommends that buildings on the west half of the northwest quadrant be limited to heights of 2-4 stories to protect the views of the existing signature office building (MacMillan). There is no prohibition recommended in the 1997 Amendment as to the height of the buildings on the southwest quadrant. In fact, the 1997 Amendment recommends an Overlay District Boundary Expansion which would increase the permitted height from 100 feet to 120 feet. Delineate exactly where the power lines are located and contact Power & Ught to determine relocation and burial possibilities. Electrical power lines are pole mounted along the current north right- of-way line of 96a Street. We have talked to IPL at the engineering level and have been told that IPL will not bury the lines. We do not, however, intend to take that answer as final and intend to pursue the matter further to see if we can cause the lines to be buried. If the lines are not buried, it will not be because of any reluctance on our part to do it, .':ODMA'~MHODMA~IO I;2771/';2 -8- (16) Drainage - how does it go and where as to the Southwest Quadrant? The current drainage for the southv~iast quadrant is not well-defined. There are several areas within the site that do not drain at al~. A portion of the southwest quadrant drains t~ the 96th Street right-of- way. The majority of the northern portion ofthe southwest quadrant drains to the 1-465 fight-of-way. A major portion of the southwest part of the site drains southwest and across to the south side of96~ Street Our proposal would be to take all of the drainage on this site and pipe it to the retention pond proposed for a Iow area of the site at the northwest comer of the site and then control the discharge to the 1- 465 right-of-way Which is the best defined drainage way to Williams Creek. This would tend to reduce flooding problems on and along 96a Street. Puffing a retention pond at the southwest area would not be prudent. First, site retention needs to outlet to 1-465, not to 96a Street. Second, a retention pond at the southwest comer of the southwest quadrant would offer no aesthetic buffer because it would be hidden from adjacent property to the south and west by the 6 foot mound and landscaping buffer that will be installed. =ODMAWHODMA~OI~T~IT;2 C. TRAFFIC (1) What is the impact on the intersection of 9.~' Street and Spdngmill Road if the traffic assignment was modified to account for a greater dispersion of traffic and thus a greater amount of traffic at the intersection of 96~ and Springmill Road? To answer this question, A & F Engineering conducted additional traffic counts at the eastern drive of the existing Parkwood. Based on those counts, approximately 16% of the existing Parkwood traffic goes to the 96~' and College intersection. Traffic counts were also done for Spdngmill Road and College Avenue which show that the existing traffic volume on Spdngmill Road is about 60% of the existing traffic volume on College Avene. Based on those figures, it could be anticipated that no more than 16%, but most likely less than 16%, of the traffic from the development would travel to the 96a and Springmill intersection (probably no more than 10%). As a consequence, A & F has revised its report to allocate 10% of the site traffic from the development to travel to the 96a and Springmill intersection. This is an increase over the original allocation of 6%. In addition, A & F has done a calculation of the level of service at 96~' and Spdegmill Road if 20% (a much higher amount than is anticipated) was assumed to travel to Sprfngmill Road. These calculations show that the intersection of Springmill Road and 96~h Street will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service even if 20% of the traffic goes to the 96u' and Spdngmill intersection. (2) What is the existing and future traffic volume at each site ddve in the prOPosed development and those in the existing Parkwood? A & F Engineering has prepared diagrams which indicate the existing and future traffic volumes at the various intersections. Those diagrams are attached hereto as Figures 1 and 2. (3) What is the proposed design of 96a Street through this area (including turn lanes, medians, traffic signals, etc.) Attached as Exhibit A is a drawing which details the number of lanes on 96~ Street as well as the geometdcs of the intersections. ::ODMA~I,~'KODMA~IO 1:27717:2 (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) What would be required at the intersection of 96~ Street and Me#dian to allow that intersection to operate at level of service D dudng the P.M. peak hourafterthe proposed deve/opmentp/an ah. d otherdevelopment in the area o c~urs ? Attached as Exhibit B is a table which summarizes the existing intersection geometdcs, the geometrics required for the intersection to operate at level of service D and the proposed geometrics outlined in Item (3) above. How will the proposed road improvements be funded? The road improvements will be funded through a partnership between the developer and the City of Carmel. Will right;of-way be dedicated and how much ? Right-of, way will be dedicated by the developer to allow the construction of 96= Street as outlined in Item (3) above. That dedication of right-of-way will be approximately 62 feet from the centeriine of the existing 96= Street. This is 20 feet more than was dedicated for Parkwood East What happens to the 30 foot wide berm if 96~ Street is expanded to greater than 4 lanes; what is the precise Ioca#on of the mound? The berm begins at approximately 62 feet from the centerline of 96t~ Street, however, the proposed roadway is approximately 30 feet from the berm. In that area is a sidewalk and green area. In the unlikely event that the 96t~ Street roadway would be expanded to more than four lanes, such expansion could occur without affecting the berm.. What does the State say relating to the improvements.regarding !-465 and U.S. 31. Attached as Exhibit C is all the correspondence that we have had with the Indiana Department of Transportation regarding the intersection of U.S. 31 and Meridian. Is there bus service to the site? Yes, Route 18-Nora serves the intersection of 96~' and Meridian and Route 28-St. Vincent serves the intersection of 96a and Springmill. Duke will continue to work with the IndyGo Public Transportation System to maintain bas service to the development, as Duke has done with their Keystone at the Crossing and Park 100 developments. ,~. (10) Check if 100,000 square feet of office equates to the exiating traffic on 96~h Street and compare the capacity of existing 96~ Street to that of the proposed 96e Street. An existing traffic count for 96t~ Street shows that a total of 9,550 vehicles travel 96a Street from Springmill to Meridian over a 24-hour period on a typical weekday. Trip generation for a 100,000 square foot office building equates to 1,451 generated trips over a 24-hour period on a typical weekday. Thus, the generated traffic from 100,000 square feet of office would increase the existing traffic by approximately 13%. The current level of service for 96~h Street is 'E'. With the improvements to be made in conjunction with the proposed development, the future level of service will be 'B'. Attached as Exhibit D is a chart prepared by A & F Engineering depicting the level of service for 96a Street. (11) Look at traffic under current zoning without any road improvements. There are approximately 10 acres on the southeast quadrant, approximately 8 acres on the southwest quadrant and approximately 6 acres on the northwest quadrant that are currently zoned to B5, all of which are located within the overlay zone. Based on the floor area ratio that is permitted, it would be possible to construct 849,600 square feet of office buildings on that area that is currently zoned. In addition, if the proposed amendments to the overlay zone are passed, the potential square footage for just those areas would be 1,060,000 square feel If development occurred on the sites without any read improvements to the intersection of Meridian and 96~ Street, which presumably could occur, the traffic would be substantially less acceptable. Attached as Exhibit E is a table which A &.F has prepared which indicates the level of service under the existing zoning without the contemplated road improvements and the level of service with the additional development in existence and the proposed improvements. (12) Will 96~ and Meridian Street ever suffer ~gridlock". Never is a long period of time and therefore we think that the question should be limited to the foreseeable future, i.e., 20 to 30 years. The answer to that question is "NO". The reason for that answer is that the recent ,,"ODMAV~,OOMAWOI;2T/'~',2 -12- (13) (14) (15) improvements to the Meridian and 1-465 interchange have provided for a much better flow of traffic making "gridlock",highly unlikely. : Can the retail access line up with the Kr~ger access and have a traffic signal? There is not a sufficient distance between the intersection of 96· and Meridian and the Kroger drive to allow a signal to be installed. Therefore, the access to the retail portion should not be aligned with the Kroger drive. What is the V/C (Volume overCapacity) of Spdngmill Road (a) currently; (b) fully developed under exlsb'ng zoning; and (c) fully developed under proposed zoning. Attached as Exhibit F is a table which summarizes the estimated V/C for the A.M. and P.M. peak hours for Springmill Road under each scenario. What is the possibili[y of establishing a program to reward cars with multiple passengers? Although to our knowledge 'no such program has ever been instituted, we would agree to study the situation and determine if a program could, be implemented that would be feasible whereby tenants that have multiple passengers in the car could be rewarded. We cannot advise the Commission that any such program would be established but we can assure the Commission that we would look into the establishment of such a program with an eye toward reducing the total volume of traffic. I I A B I I SITE I SITE 2 E 108rd ST. 102nd ST. PENN. PKY LE D W 96TH (sss) (41 I) (5~.2) (o) o-~,, ~ LEGEND -- &Il. PR HOUR 96th STREET AND. MERIDIAN STREET DUKE REALTY FIGURE 1 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES ¢~1999. A&F Eng'~eeHng Co.. [nc. A ISITE I B SITE 2 E 103rd ST, 102nd ST. PENN. PI(Y IE D LLI I01ST <~ { ~+ ~..(.) f~ ¢,oe) 7eS.,~' ~ ~ (') '.~ ~ ~., 03) tLEGEND (00) = P.U. PE~: HOUR · ,. N[GLIG[SL~' 96th STREET AND MERIDIAN STREET DUKE REALTY FIGURE 2 FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES O1999, A&:F Engineering Co.. :nc. mrr c-i II~rDIANrA DI~-PARTIvl]~T O1: TRANSPORTATION' Room 1~55 l.,dianapolir, Indiana 4620~-2249 252-5555 ,FAX: (317) 232-0258 FRANK O'BANNON, Governor CURTIS A. WlLA~, Commissioner April 13, 1999 Writer's Direct Liae 317-2~2-5646 Mr. Holh'baugh: The Indiaaa l~'parunent of Tra~portation HOT) is working oa the development of a iat~'ol~age oon~.pt pla~ to hclp cooza;--to had development dccisiom at thc I-4g~ and US-3 ! iat~hange area. ~ n;ccawy oeen ~m~ate. d with the l~ogramrmag of~ eawronmeatal, eagiaeezlng, land actui~io~, and cousumctio, activities in thc deparlmc='~ produclion sche4uh. The coas~ltant firm of Par-~ons T.~.,-~orm~io= Oroup has bcen sclcc~i for lh¢ environmental m~uties on US-31 ~ 1-465, wi~,h work anilc~a_.~! [o be compleL-d ill 24 momhs. The coraplelion of thc cnvlzor~culal smgica and ry' ~=gm ermg ri'Il pmvid~ the detailed interchange pb. ns necesr,~ to move the proj~t forward into.engineering desigu. CrD'tinc ~ Dcputy Ccrnmi~/oner Ofl~: of Phm.;-g and f. utc~L~uixlal Transporlaffoll Printed ~ Recycled Paper · An F-qual Opporatn~ F_J~ph,Ter · hap'//ww~.~e, lr~v.~aum/dot, lnd~Atn'd EXHIBIT C-2 INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION i00 North Senate Avenue Room 3[755 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2249 (317) 232-5533 ' FAX: 017) 232-0238 FRANK O'BANNON, Governor CURTIS A. WILEY, Commissioner October 25, 1998 Writer's Direct Line Mr. Chris Seger Vice President & General Maaager Indiana Office Group Duke Realty Investments 8888 Keystone Avenue, Suite I200 Indianapolis, IN 46240 Dear Mr. Seger: Thank you for your letter advising thc Indiana Department of Transportation of your purehas'~ agreement for tha three tracts of land adjacent to the U.S. 31 / 1-465 interchange on the north side of Indianapolis. We appreciate your efforts to advise us ofth/s development. Mr. Craig Flandermeyer, of your staff, met with Cris Klika, INDOT Deputy Commissioner, to discuss your plans for the area. I offer the following comments for your consideration. Thc Major Investment Study has been completed that identified this highway upgrade, generally within its existing corridor, as thc preferred solution to the baffle congestion problems in the area. The project is now entering thc envi~onmelltal/mpact document phase. Tiffs work w/Il take approximately two years and will result in a record of decision by the Federal I-Hghway Admlnlstrallon that the project can conthlue into dets/led design phase. The environmental impact statement will be written for the entire length of the project from 1-465 to SR 38; however, INDOT will divide the length into manageable segments to design and coustmct. The Environmental Impact Statement should be completed in approximately two years. It is during this process that construction schedules are adjusted and refined. We are tentatively scheduled.to construct the middle segment of thc project (approximately 131st Street to 161st Street) over a time period of 2003 to 2011, with ramps and mainline likely being constructed in different years. In the area of the 1-465 interchange, we have set up our schedules to begin consmicfion in approximately 2015. Please reali=e that these are tentative schedules and will be adjusted as issues relating to construction, traffic maintenance and funding availab/lity are resolved in the environmental and design phases.- As you surmised, Site B appears problematic for compatibility with a proposed interchange improvement. While we do not know details beyond thc information you already have, there are some anticipated constraints. -eo~ s.ntl m. :uols~qs uo~zoclsu~ atp aoumluo ol ,LOCII',H q~.t~ ~zo~ o~ ~l!l!q!xolt Otll a,x~q ii.~a pu~ ons~ s.~ uo sn ~.L~ o~o.mnunuoo o~ ~nm.~uo~ ii.~ noX odoq I 'poooon$ ol ~uomdolo,~p 'sal!S .mo,(.Io aa. nil IIe o1 sloedml, oltl .Io ~p.l .~:Lloq TIOntU ~ O~.mt II.Ua ,LOCII~ '.z~,( oql .uFq1!PA ~ u! ~Is~ s!.ql qs!ldmOooe ol ~OA~ ll.b~ a*~ 1hq 'so!ouol~V uo~l~l~oclsu~,L o~1S U~tll ao)s~.l qontu ~po,a s~adoloAop pueI ~I1 o~POl,~OU~O~ oA~ '.~oX lxou aql u.~!~ ~e s.rql ~o$ uo!lon~suoo oql ptre uo!le~n~Nuoo aqlJo ~op! al.m9op ozotu qontu ~ a,~q plnoqs £OCL~I '£ 'lu.~suoo leO!lzo, ltmoN.n~s ~ o~ anp uo!loas Ilg qt!q v uo paoeld aq I1!*~ duma aq~ 'zo,a*~oH 'a oils ol slo~dtu! az!tu!u!~u ol g9~-I aU!lu!~m p~*~ol m Pallnd oq llq!ssod olmb plnoo s~u~eap ldoouoo ano uo ua~oqs dtu~ aq,L · uopoouuoo s!$ o~m o1 dtu~ doo! ~ gmsn ol~d!o!lue lou op aff~ 'uo!loauuoo X~oa.g-ol-X~,~oo.g paads-qg!q XlO{~apom ~ u!el~tu o{ zapoo u! sdttrea Ieuo!loa.~!p aq XIO~I!I ll!,~ punoqql~ou 1£ $~ ol punoq{s~o ~9~'-I tuo~ dtu~ oq£ 'I .g661 'g~ ~aqoloo ~IHDHS SPclHO Octol~r 1, 1998 RE..CARMEL NO~'IFICA2'ION OF DEVELOPM£N~ pLAN- fl.5. $1 & 1-4~5 Dear Mr. Wiley: Duke Realty Limited Partnership has negotiated a purchase agreement with NRC Corporation for the purchase of property located at the intersection of U~. 31 and 1-465. This letter is written on befudfof NRC CorporatiOn as owner/seller and Duke Realty Limited Pannership as the purchaser/developer. The property comprises vacant ~'ound ia tho NW', SW, and SE quadrants of this inte~ectlon*and consists of spproximately ~4 ~cres. Du[~ envisions this ground bei~4~ developed similar to the ParkWood Crossing Offic~ Park which is located at 96'~ Su~t and College Avenue. Duke is moving forwmd with plans to apprOl~at~l¥ zone this property to allow development to proceed. Initial master planning studies hav~ been completed nnd are included for your infot'm~aon. ' · ~,~v GU~UL, a ~py OX wmcn ,e at~cne~ me ptans develope~ for ~ by Bemamdm, Loehmueller and Asso~iat~ v~re ml~,~.,~.~l on the ~ m.,Wr plan. TI~ intl~ct on the SW qm~lrant wa~ most significant. A planned fr~w~y ramp from eastbound 1-465 to not. bound U.S. 31 b~'~d th~ 35 acr~ SW q,~_~mt tender~ tl~ ~ u~p~nb!e for fl~e proposed Duke development ~ intends tO. apply for an Economic Hardship Exception from the ~y Plan Commission as allowed by 23B.16.4 b. of the U~S. 31 Overlay Zone. .Duke would like to initiate discussion with R'TDOT on how both development end transportation interests m relation to this sit~ may be served. Improving traffic flow adjacent to this site and through thc 31 coaidor is an issu~ ~ v~ would lik~ to I~lp facili~_.~,__-. However, ~e initial plan by Beraardin. Lochmueller and Associ~ eliminates tim development potential of 35 acres of prime rea/e~tat~. A r~pre~entativo from Duke will call within the ne~t week to establish a time to discuss this situation. Vice President & General Manager, Indiana Office Group Enc.: Master Plans - NW', SW, SE Quadrants Cannel U.S. 3t Overlay Zone, 23B.16A Mil~ Holllbaugh, City of Cannel Phil N'~ely, Bose, MoKinney & Evans Rich Horn, DRI Exccutive YZce President Office Group Craig Flaudermeyer, DRI Development Services ~RIT C-3 EXI-IIBrr B Direction Movement Existing Number Number of Lanes Number of Lanes of Lanes Proposed in Report for LOS D Leit-Tum 2 2 2 Northbound Through 3 3 Right-Turn I Right- 1 Right- 1 Turn/Through Tum/Throu~h Left-Turn 2 2 2 Southbound Through 3 3 3 Riiht-Tum I 2 .1 Lex~-Tum I 2 3 Eastbound Through I 2 I Right-Turn 1 R/gM- ! I Turat ou h Le/t-Tum I 2 2. Westbound Through ! 2 2 Right-Turn 1 Right- 1 3 Turnffhrou h posodo~d ql!A~ satunloA a~aj. luatudOla^aCl pasodO~d + somnloA o~mj. pol~ouoO puli ~u~o~A + somnloA o~j. 600g ~oA + satunloA o~M~£ ~u!ls!x~ :D o.u~tao~ ._ q~!z~ samnloA o~..~p~,i' luotudolo^OC] posodoad + sotunloA o~..L ~u!ls.ex~ :~7 o!.touaog ,{~p~o~ l~u!ls!x~r pu~ satunloA o~M~,I. l~u!ls.rx~ :y'o.u~tao~: (punoqlse~punocl}sath) ic'uo,no~!p a~m D :~ 8 soy~u~ ~o$ mlrs~ $0'I ~ ~ °U~l'P D 3 OU~l-~: ¥ $0~I poz~l~U'V .4m,ap~o~ o!.~uao$ EXI-IIBIT E MOVEMENT Zoning w/out Improvements Proposed Development w/ (AM Peak/PM Peak) Improvements (AM Peak/PM Peak) Nuahbound Approach C/B B/* Southbound Approach */B ,/, Eastbound App~uaGl C/* B/B Westbound Approach Cd* B/B Inte~.~e~ion ,/, ,/, The intersection operates below acceptable levels. The traffic volumes along Meridian Street cause significant delays at this intersection. ~L' I 6L' ~,u!u o'z pasodoa~l 3u!uo~z ~u!;s.tx3 suo!;!puo~) 3ups.ct3 Mr. Gregory K. Silver At'tomey a~Law 342 Massachusetts Avenue 400 Marott Center Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2 t 61 Ca~mel - Clay Towmhip Planning Commission Carmel City Hal Cannel, Indiana 46032 June 15, 1999 Re: Duke Proposal 966 and Meridian Streets Camel, Indiana 46032 Y'argcr Engiaeexing, Inc. lob Number: 990602 Dear Mr. Silver and PlarmMg Commission Membexs, As :~ pro£essional engineer, register in the State of Indiana with 16 years experience ha traffic engineering ava at Mr. Bud Wilson's request, I have reviewed the Traffic Impact A.,mlysis prepared by A~F Engineering. { have also mad HNTB's and thc City of Indianapolis' reviews of the A&F study. Ia short, I agr~ with HNTB's and the City's comments. ! also have ndctitional comments, which I have documented below. It would ap.tx:ar th~ study ~cope by City, of Carmel has left out tbe most important location: the 1-465 at L,'S 31/Meridian Street interchange. If the interchange is over capacity, it will have dramatic effects on tr~eac proteins for miles. The study area is one of the most ilxlportant degksiOtlS to b,¢ m~de in deto,,,ining a study scope. While the study area appears to be horn Spring Mill Road to College Avenue and 96~' -~tr~t to 103~a Street, the I-~65 at I~-$ 31 interchange, located In the middle oftbe study ma, wm omitted from the list of locations to be analyzexL I find this disturbing to say the least. This study carmot be considered valid if the interchange is not included. Indianapolis Detmrtment of Metropolitan Development's (DMD) re,~w foumi some items not mentioned in th~ HNTB rcvlew. The biggest i~sues in my opinion are the growth rate and directional .alstributio~. assumptions. I must agree vdth the City of Indin~a.~lis' comments on the assumptions. A 3 % annual growth on Meridiaa Strut seems ex~eme. I would expect a 1% growth rate, similar to that used i-n tl~ Village of West Clay study. On the north side of the county line, 1 would have preferred to use traffic ibrecast$ from the Village of West Clay Traffic Lmpact Stud)'. Given tho congestion found in this study, I have to believe that :;raffle would use altemm~ routes and there£o~ would have a subslanfially diff~ent directional distribution and assignment than those predated in th~ A&F study. As mentioned ill the HNTB r~view, A&F's study e~ppears to have properly addv-s?d the fir~ few st~.. s, but failed to finish the process in the analys~s, £mdlngs, recommendations, and conclusions .sections. The)' are relying on not making the level of service worse. This is not consisrtn'g with thc Carmel Tramportation Impact Studies Ibr Proposed Development Ouid¢lines. A~F's study relies on tl~ ~.lLmitation of current analysis procedures to hide a horn~ole situation that could arise from ~hc proposed developmertt. In cases wh<'e the non-proposed situation is 1401 tidal,,? Drive Mr. S~lver Sur~ 15, 1999 Page2 over capacity l~ke tkis one, tbe fast step is to determine what is required to reach an acceptable level of ser~Sce. A&F did nat do this. They relied on comparing one level of se~-ice F to another and then saying they are not making it worse. Carmel's guidelines call for identifying n~cded hnprovements ta malntai~ a level of service C, not F. HNTB's comment.5 m~micn level of service D. This is typical in most situations, but is not the criteria for Carmel per their guidelines, which requires level of service C. If AH Engineering wants to limit their recommendations to reasonable hnprovcments, then ~ey should have the ~me geometry in all scenarios where the level of service is less than C. They added lanes to the Froposed zc~matio (#S) that are not included in scenarios I - 4. If the lanes would be rea~onable for scenario 5, then they would be reasccable in the other scenarios, provided they improve the level o£scrvice. We have reviewed A&F's level of service analyses and have found man), dlscxepan~ies. There are several cases where improper signal t;mi~gs have been used in the analyses. At the eritical intersection of 96° and Meridian, the lane utilization factors used by A&F are the defaults, wb. ich are very inaccurate for the notnhbound approach. We have counted the northbound approach to determine the current lane use factors. W'e found that althouo? ~ ~e fou~ l~ne% 32% of ~he northbound ~rou~h and ~ht turn U~affin ~es the ri~h~ most lar.,~. To ~ more ~ ~rs for the l~e scen~o% o~in - d.~;~ou ~uformation would ~ needed. The ~ involved wou~d be eas~ ~ and ~outh approaches o£ 96a and Meriden Str~s, the ~-~65 at US 31 ~rchange, and the ~out~ approach of US 3~ a~ ~03~ Su~e~ Lane u~ f-~t~r~ would be needed ~o~ every multiqane movemen~ a~ 96a and ~e~d~an Struts, ~nd the I-~$ r~nps. Th~s ~ info~on should ~ considered for southbound US 31 u well A&I: d~d ~st enmlde~ lane ~e faexo~s~ bu~, they mns~ be ~o~3idered ~o enrrec~ ~h~z~ the We have rcanalyzed many of the scemarios to de~,udne a more accurate level of service, and more impormn-dy, an iatersec:ion degree of saturation. A&F should report int~wsection degrees o£samm~ion where they exceed capacity. The de_ar~ of saturation is the ratio of traffic volume to capacity and should be between 80 - 95% for efficieml¥ designed and timed ~ons. Lower levels during peak traffic times indicate either wasteful design lx'actices or poor signal timin~ Higher degrees of sauwation indicate capacity problems. When an intersection degree of saturatian is over 100%, it is by definition, over capacity. At '..his point ~raffi¢ queues (lines of cat's x~ziting for the signal) sdH co,r~ue to groxv until the demand decreases below ~e capacity. When suftlciem time has past vahere the interse~en is under capaci~; queues can diuipaxe and thc intersection can return to aorm~l operation. C.x"e should be takea in analyzing inte~rsections that were over capacity to dcmrmin¢ the proper traffic demand. Forecasted traffic, fiow~ must include residual trdfin from a previous hour where capacity, is an issue, la most cues, traffic will find alternate routes rather than waiting on an over capacity sit,,~fion. In this case, those altemates would be Spring lVlill Road. 96= S~et, College Avenue, g6~ Street, 106~ Street, and so o~. This is why l mentioned the directional distribution assumptions above and ¢onctuded that the distributions used by A&F are very questionable. Mz. Silver Page 3 T~e following table shows the degrees of sanaation with A&F's suggested in~rse~ion geometry and our sugg~ste~t inters~clion .~a~nett~ to achieve a level of service of C. 96' Str~e! at A&F Engineering Meridian Street Gmm~ ~09 ~ena~o 3 Scena~o 5] Scenado 3 S~n~o P~ P~ HO~ E~g Zo~g Propus~ .Ex~g Zon~g Prop~ Devdopment ~velopment L,~=I or--ce * ' [ C [ C Av~ge ~lay * * 21.9t' 23.9 ~ of 167% 12~/~ [ Sa~on * Indicates the .~o. fo~a~e ~ar unable to calculate dd~ and les, et of serv~e due ~o an ~.ctr~nely over capacity In a szudy ~ke tiffs where there ~re closely spaced/n~rsections with higtz uafEc volume~, traffic signal progress/on should be zzwicwed. I! was not done in A&F's study. Apparently, the City of Carmel did not ask for a detailed progression ankh/sis udng Tmr~yz-7F, CORSI2v[, or Synchro ~of'cw~afe. The Carmel Tram~rtation Impact Study guidelines call for "Additional analyses may be needed depe~lin§ on the proposed development, ks impac-.s, and the tzansportation system within the study afe~. These may include traffic conlroi, wa~=a or progression stud/es, ...' Given the above infor~a~on, I would recommend a larger study area ~ includes 860, Street, I06~ Street, Mich/~,-I Road, and Keystone Avenue. Given the likely ~version for capadv/rc~ons, this study should ~ w/th a travel demand model (pre~m-nabl¥ Indianapolis DtviD'$) and develop appropda-.e capacity re~u~ained dis~-ibutions and assignments. Because of thc closely ~aced intersecfious and the importance of the interchange, aa a~a w/de $imulatinr~anirnation using COP, SIM would be appropriate :o model thc/n~eracticn of'he traffic si~'m! coordixlation and .',he interchange ramps, inciudin~ the mer~ on and off the 1-465 mainlines. The analysis periods should be all times of &y where there are over capacity. inte~cct/ons. V~*hcn an intersection is not over capacRy, then it need not be analyzed. (Obv/ously, the first and the las~ hours of a period wou~d need to bc under capacity co prove that additional hour~ would not be needed.) At un~zlized loca~/or~ a ~:lvc-hour forecast is needed to predict :he need for a traff/c signal. While ~he Indiana Mauuai on Uniform TrMfic Con~l Devices (MUTCD) conza/ns a daily volume w'~rram for new facili~ca, w'mrrant #9, it doc~ not apply to thture Lraffic volumes, only "currcn~ design volumes." Add/tio~a[ analyses should aMo include queue storage distances usin~ over .capaci~ methods where needed. Traffic at over capacity un$igna[ized {ntc~ections should be rcreuted to under capacity. /nterscctions Iv~. $iivur Pase 4 where there a~e possibilities for d~ing so. All intersections should be analyzad t~ provide the lowest imezsectioa delay possible for a givea lane u.se eonfigu~atiou and should have an inte~eetioa revel of service of C or higher. No apgroada should have a v/¢ ratio of more than ltpHt: (ahou~ la conclusion, the A&F study is ineemplete amd nee6s correction. It dees uot meet the standard presented in the Cannel Tr~aspormt. ioa Impact Studi~ for Proposed Development guidelines. The proposed developmeat would have dramatic negative impacts oR tt. armpottation system for miles a~ound the site, given t_he roadway improvements shown La the A&F raport. Thc analy:se.s fa the report show potemial gfidloc, k problema. This l~Oposed development sho'..,Id have a traffic irapact sandy that is complete and provides ac.o~table levels of service with praatical roadway improvcmems. INDOT should be part of r~wi~,v process sinc~ they must approve any chaages to their roadways. Please call me with your qaestions or comments at 31 ?-475-1100. Yarg~r Eagine,~rLag, Inc. Bradley W[lli~tm Yarger, P.E. President Bud W'dsou, Rua~nable P,~identi~l Roadways Committe~ Para Lamber, Heluml~nd Coalition Mzyor Bmiuard, City of Carmel Mark Monroe, City o£C,amel leffHill. Hamilton County Highway Depa~aeat Mayor Gotdsmith, City of Indianapolis St~ve C, mnin~h~rn, Indianapolis DIvlD Paul Satterly, H]VTB John Myers, Parsons Br/nk~rhoff GARY P. PRICES' STEVEN L, TUCHMAN~' THOMAS R RUGE John Hiatt 934 East 191st Street Westfield, IN 46074 Dear Councillor: LEWIS & KAPPES PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS AT L~W 1700 ONE AMERICAN SQUARE OF COUNSEL BOX 82053 SAMUEL A. FUt;£ER* INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46282-0003 LF. SLIE DUVALI. (317) 639-1210 LORI KYLE ENDR[S Scott D. ¥onover** TEl ECOPIERS *Aho admitted in Florida (317) 639-4882 * *41so admitted tn Illino~ (317) 639-4878 and tYa~hington D.C. TED. B. LEWIS (1919-1991) ~Regis ered Mediators Web Sile June 21, 1999 Htep~/www.Lewls-Kappes.com E-Mail Add,ess Of~ce~Lewis-K~ppes.com pKappcs~ Lewis- Kappes.com Direct DialtVoic¢ Mad We wdte on behalf of the 450 petitioners of the Reasonable Residential Roadways Committee CRRRC"), all of whom are interested land owners in the "West-Clay~ area. The remarks attributed to certain Council members by Ms. ' Dana Knight in her article "Councilors upset over resident designed intersection" under date of June 9, 1999 indicate that Hamilton County Council Members may be misinformed with regard to the development of plans for the 106"' and Towne Road intersection. We would like to make certain that you understand fully': and fairly what has been accomplished. The RRRC has three objectives: Support roadways and intersections in the West-Clay area that satisfy the projected traffic needs into the year 2020 (the design year adopted by the Highway Department). Minimize the amount of private property to be taken for these purposes. Preserve the fine residential character of the West-Clay area. in the fall of 1998, before any engineering designs were begun, our clients arranged to meet with representatives of the Highway Department and with Mr. Mark Eckert, the project engineer assigned to the project by the contract engineering firm of Beam, Longest and Neff ("BLN"). Dates were set, but for reasons unknown to our people, these meetings were canceled and no preliminary meetings were held to discuss the project. On March 25, 1999 preliminary plans were first presented for public scrutiny. At that public meeting, the objections of the RRRC were made known to the Highway and BLN representatives. We were informed by Highway that our objections would not be considered, and that the design as presented would be submitted to the County Commissioners for approval. Moreover, access to much needed engineering data was actually denied to the protestants. Hamilton County Council June 21,1999 Page 2 The RRRC, and the Wilson family in particular, then employed, at significant cost, an architect, a traffic engineer and an hydrologist to consider alternative ways to provide for the same traffic "through-put" as projected by BLN, while minimizing the amount of private property to be taken for this purpose. We are pleased to report that Commissioner Sharon Clark was instrumental in arranging for the technical people from Highway, BLN and the RRRCANilson group to meet; first in technical session and, secondly, with the Commissioners to consider, carefully, the design criteria for the 106"' and Towne Road intersection. Through the efforts of the engineers and other technical people assembled and the exchange of ideas and consideration of proper alternatives an intersection plan evolved that satisfies completely the so called "20 year build out" objective, while reducing the amount of land required by more than 27%. This was not a "citizen designed" intersection. It was the product of informed, qualified professionals sharing concepts and alternatives and the Commissioners, thus informed, agreeing on design criteria that satisfies the projected traffic requirements of the area, while minimizing the damage done to adjoining property owners, reducing cost and helping to preserve the fine residential character of West--Clay. The savings to Hamilton County taxpayers, in land acquisition cost alone; exceeds an estimated $'~20.000,00. We shall demonstrate that significant cost savings approximating $185,000.00, m the aggregate, flow from the revised design criteria, while the level of service provided t-em~.ips essentially the same. The attached summary illustrates the Comparison between the preliminary design first submitted to the public on March 25, 1999 and the design criteda adopted by the Commissioners after careful, thoughtful consideration of the myriad issues and alternatives inherent in planning the project. For the reasons illustrated above and in the attachment, the RRRC submits, respectfully, th.at the revised design criteria should be supported by the Hamilton County Council. We urge you, as a Council member, to do so. The public has a direct "stake" in the development of such roadway plans, particularly in Clay-West. The future residential character and value of the neighborhood depends upon the nature of the roadways installed therein. With regard to 106"' and Towne, public comment has preserved the projected level of service, reduced the amount of pdvate property needed and saved the taxpayers substantial sums of money. LEWIS & KAPPES Hamilton County Council June 21,1999 Page 3 Our technical team would welcome the opportunity to discuss any features of the planning process or of the design cdteria with you individually or with the Council members collectively. Sincerely, LEWIS & KAPPES, PSK/mbr Enclosure LEWIS &. KAPPES 106TM STREET AND TOWNE ROAD INTERSECTION DESIGN CRITERIA EVOLUTION 1. Traffic Requirement Projections: Hamilton County Highway Department ("Highway") and Beam, Longest & Neff (engineers for Highway) (UBLN") projected a five percent (5%) annual growth in traffic at the intersection through the year 2020. The RRRS traffic engineer was of the opinion that this projection was excessive; nevertheless, all design criteria used herein are based upon the Highway/BLN projections. 2. Level of Service: A. Standards for Service Level Classifications: Service Level = Number of Vehicles X Time to Clear Intersection ("Delay Time") Service Level Delay Time in Seconds B 5 to 15 C 15 to 25 D 25 to 40 B. Comparative Design Results (Peak Time Analysis Projected to 2020) Delay Time Service Delay Time Service Desicln AM Level PM Level Original/Highway 13.4 B 14.5 B Revised Criteria 15.7 C 17.4 C Difference in Seconds 2,3. 2.9 [Note: Original Calculation was retimed to include north bound turn arrow throughout the day instead of omitting it in the morning and signal timings were optimized for AM and PM.] The revised design cdteda increases projected future delay time by a scant 3 seconds! Level of Service is essentially unchanged! 3. Spec. ific Design Changes: A. Drainage, General: Enclose surface water drainage and move into and beneath buffer and multi-use path areas. Odginal design contemplated broad swales on all sides of intersection for surface water drainage. Enclosing the drains reduces the number of acres to be condemned from 13.4 to 9.7 acres a 3.7 acre or 27.21% reduction in land acquisition area and cost. B. Right Turn Lanes. Engineers agreed that dght turn lanes were not necessary to preserve required level of service, present and projected on Towne Road. Towne Road as revised has two through Fanes and a left turn lane, total of 5 lanes. Right turn lanes on Towne Road, being unnecessary, were eliminated, right turn lanes on 106~ Street were retained. This action also reduces the size of the box culvert. C. Medians. The width of the Median on Towne Road was reduced from 20 feet to 16 feet. The median preserves reom for left turn lane at intersection. The raised portion of the median on Towne Road, north side of the intersection will extend from the intersection to a point just south of the Riley driveway. From that point on northward the median will be painted and not raised. Sixteen foot medians are proper design criteria. Raised portion was reduced to enable school busses proceeding from south to "queue up" preparatory to making left turn into school property without interfering with north bound traffic passing by. Median reduction also to enables pdvate owners at the intersection to access both north and south bound lanes on Towne Road. D. Turn Radii. The radius on each turn in the intersection shall be WB-15 semi-trailer truck (50 foot radius with tapers). WB -15 with tapers has been used in numerous places throughout the West Clay area. Original design was for a 75 foot radius with tapers. E. Multi-Use Paths. Provided space for Multi-Use paths on both sides of Towne Road and 106~ Street. Buffer shall be 5 feet in width and paths 8 feet in width with I foot beyond exterior edge of path for right of way. Original design provided space for the Multi-Use paths and drainage but did not design Multi-Use paths nor provide for utilities other than surface water drainage. Neither the original nor the present plan contemplated the construction of the Multi-Use paths at this time. (Note: We are at a loss to explain why Ms. Knight in her Topic Article reported that Multi-Use paths were eliminated. She attended the planning meeting and should have been aware of the action taken.) F. Center Line Shift. Shift the center line of Towne Road 6 feet to the west and design shape of the roadway accordingly. This was a cost saving measure. West side properties are presently undeveloped and the value of undeveloped land estimated to be less costly than developed properties on the east. There will be less residual damage on west side as compared to east side. West owners are aware of and have interposed no objection to the concept. 4. Pendinglssues: A. Drainage, South Culvert. Original design called for the southern most culvert in Towne Road to be enlarged. The enlargement necessitated elevating Towne Road by four feet. The Commissioners asked Highway/BLN to review the hydrological data submitted by RRRC and determine whether or not there was a feasible way to reduce the size of the culvert or to pick up the surface water on the west side of Towne and run it under ground to the legal drain already existing beneath the intersection. BLN has reported to Highway that in its opinion the culvert can be reduced in size at a cost savings of approximately $27,000.00, or, alternatively, eliminating the culvert and running the surface water underground on the west side of Towne to the intersection at a net savings of $35,000.00. In light of this report the RRRC has asked the Commissioners to adopt the concept of running the water along the west side of Towne 2 Road. This also preserves private property. The Commissioners have not had an opportunity to act upon this request. B. Maintenance Easements: Enclosure of the surface water drains placed beneath the 14 foot buffer and Multi-Use areas on each side of the intersection provides adequate land mass for construction and maintenance of the hard surface roadway and enclosed drains. RRRC is urging the Commissioners to make this determination. 5. Estimated Cost Effects: A. Savings: a. Land Acquisition (3.7 Acres) b. Pavement Reduction c. South Culvert (Net) d. Box Culvert Total Savings B. Additional Costs: a. Re-engineering b. Added Work for 6ft Shift Total Additional $120,000.00 70,000.00 35,000.00 5,000.00 $ 25,000.00 20,000.00 $230,00.00 45,000.00 Net Estimated Savings $185,000.00 With Council approval of the design criteria changes outlined above and satisfactory resolution of the "Open Issues", we believe that further objections to the proposed intersection will disappear and that the affected land owners will cooperate in moving the project forward. Conclusion The Commissioner's design cdteria accomplishes everything that the Highway/BLN plan accomplishes. It does so with less taking of and damage to private property and less cost. We solicit your support. Q:tBOCAR~TOW N ROAD~Cou ncil Attachment.wpd PETITION TO SHARON R. CLARK COMMISSIONER REPRESENTING CLAY TOWNSHIP, HAMILTON COUNTY, INDIANA FOR THE PURPOSE OF: '1. PRESERVING THE RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER OF WESTERN CLAY TOWNSHIP AND 2. ESTABLISHING REASONABLE CRITERIA FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF ROADWAYS AND INTERSECTIONS IN WESTERN CLAY TOWNSHIP We, the undersigned, taxpayers and owners of residential real estate in Western Clay Township object to the proposed intersection and roadway development plans proposed by the Hamilton County Highway Department. We ask you, as our Commissioner, to work and vote for: Roadway, zoning and related planning that will preserve the beautiful residential and estate properties located in Western Clay, and discourage non-residential development within the area. Roadway plans that are reasonably suitable for serving the traffic generated and, with reasonable foresee ability, to be expected in the Spdngmill, Towne and Shelboume Road way areas. We respectfully submit that: 3. 4. 5. 80 foot rights, of-way, including the intersections, which allow for two north and south lanes of traffic are adequate to serve the present and reasonable future needs of the area. Enclosed sewer and surface water drainage, restrained median size and limited sidewalk facilities will also conserve encroachment onto adjoining properties. Our proposed adequate, yet modest, roadway development will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and prevent incursion of commercial, business and industrial activity. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 135 foot intersections and 120 foot rights-of-way are diametrically opposed to the preservation of the land use portions of the comprehensive plan for residential West Clay Township. The reasonable planning suggested by this petition will be far less costly to the taxpayers of Hamilton County. $2,000,000.00 and $3,000,000.00 intersections are unreasonable and unnecessarily costly. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please return to Doug Floyd, Attorney, 970 Logan St., Noblesville IN 46060 Clara. B. Green 9902 Towne Road Carmel, 1N 46032 Robert & Sue Altum 10311 Towne Road Carmel, IN 46032 Neil & Carol Mack 10361 Towne Road Carmel, IN 46032 Andy & Loft Wilson 10545 Towne Road Carmel, IN 46032 Martha & Carlyle A. Wilson, II 10411 Towne Road Carmel, IN 46032 Thomas W. & Bonnie G. Riley 10800 Towne Road Carmel, IN 46032 James E. & Tammie Fisk 11550 Towne Road Carmel, IN 46032 Hasam & Gamze Akay 2835 Towne Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Herbert C. & Elizabeth Doepken 2972 Towne Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Mike & Becky Irons 2802 W. 96th Street Indianpaolis, 1N 46268 Frank L. & Gayle Cobb 401 E. 106th Street Indianapolis, IN 46280 Cynthia & David Palmer 1060 W. 106th Street Cannel, IN 46060 Eric & Sally Blom 2000 W. 106th Street Carmel, IN 46032 Mr. & Mrs. Yale Rice, Jr. 3105 W. 106th Street Carmel, IN 46032 William David Bowman 3263 W. 106th Street Carmel, IN 46032 Michael F. & Sandra S. Moran 1158 W. 106th Street Carmel, IN 46032 Boyd & Alice A. Hovde 1814 W. 106th Street Carmel, IN 46032 Stephen & Sharon White 3110 W. 106th Street Carmel, IN 46032 Loree Hildebrandt 3111 W. 106th Street Carmel, IN 46032 Gearld & Jan Wahls 314 W. 107th Street Carmel, IN 46032 James Noland Jr., M.D. 770 W. 116th Street Carmel, IN 46032 L. Hamilton 1430 W. ll6th Street Carmel, IN 46032 Owen & Ruth Hutson 2745 W. 146th Street Westfield, IN 46074 Jay & Jan Shapiro 13180 Abbots Place Carmel, I N 46033 Steve L. & Angie Hall 1242 Amethyst Ct. Carmel, IN 46032 Pan-Yu & Hung-Ir Lai 2757 Bay Court Carmel, IN 46032 Mark & Pam Saxhaug 32 Bennett Carmel, IN 46032 Robert & Sue M. Claycombe 1805 Burning Tree Lane Carmel, IN 46032 David & Karen Gillum 2206 Bunting Tree Lane Carmel, IN 46032 Lynn Chandler 2620 Chaseway Court Indianapolis, IN 46268 F. Carl & Sondra Dutede, Jr. 10577 Chatham Crt. Carmel, IN 46032 James McGill & JK Fetters 1365 N. Claridge Way Carmel, IN 46032 Paul G.& Betty J. Smith 10427 Connaught Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Lynn Hildebrandt 10442 Connaught Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Morris C. Rowlett 10596 Coppergate Carmel, IN 46032 Joseph L. & Beverly Kack 10575 Coppergate Carmel, IN 46032 Jerome H. & Marlene Fleisch 10532 Coppergate Carmel, IN 46032 Dale & Mary M. Scannell 501 Copley Place Indianapolis, IN 46290 Henry & Jan Aguet 540 Copley Place Indianapolis,IN 46290 C. Thomas & Pamela E. Lambert 616 Copley Place Indianapolis, IN 46290 Charles N. & Janet Howard 9601 Copley Drive Indianapolis, IN 46290 Clark & Nancy Meeks Iverson 10592 Coppergate Carmel, IN 46032 Tom Hession 10850 Crooked Stick Lane Carmel IN 46032 Christine Woodword-Duncan 10905 Crooked Stick Lane Carmel, IN 46032 James E. & Vickie Doherty 11149 Crooked Stick Lane Cannel, IN 46032 Jordan & Ann Vukas 11840 Cmssfields Ct. Cannel, IN 46032 James M. & Patricia A. Estep 2495 Crossfields Ct. Cannel, IN 46032 Kent A. Miller 9950 Culpepper Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Randy & Jenifer Foxworthy 9999 Ditch Road Carmel IN 46032 Jeny & Joan Flynn 11024 Ditch Road Carmel, IN 46032 Suzanne S. Somers 10404 Ditch Road Cannel, IN 46032 Joe & Eleanor Lang 10714 Ditch Road Carmel IN 46032 Rose Mary & Savas Mallos 11140 Ditch Road Carmel, IN 46032 Thomas J. & Linda M. Carroll 11935 Durbin Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Charles & Sara C. Scott 12040 Durbin Drive Carmel IN 46032 Gregory J. & Virginia V. Hahn 2565 Durbin Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Terry & Teresa Crockett 3352 Eden Way Circle Carmel, IN 46033 Kermit & Karen Gasche 9710 Elm Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Mr. & Mrs. Navio Occhialini 9750 Elm Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Donald A. & Cathy Rowe 3221 Fairway Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Martin F. Lipp 10839 Greenbrier Drive Carmel, 1N 46032 Dave & Nan Pazdemik 10515 Greentree Drive Carmel, IN 46032 George E. & Glenda C. Bradford 10919 Greenbrier Drive Carmel, IN 46032 David Bush & Chrystal Towney 10585 Greentree Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Harry W. & Constance C. Earle 10400 Hussey Lane Cannel, IN 46032 Mr. & Mrs. Thomas M. Miller, Jr. 10530 Hussey Lane Carmel, IN 46032 Dale & Cheri Hammer 10725 Kings Mill Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Thomas E. O'Brien 1140 Laurelwood Carmel, IN 46032 Carol & Dr. Jay Weiss 1148 Laurelwood Carmel, IN 46032 David A. & Deborah W. Vondle 1149 Laurelwood Carmel, IN 46032 Weldon T. Egan 1255 Laurelwood Carmel, IN 46032 Steve & Kim Johnson 2310 Lincoln Drive Cicero, IN 46034 Jeff & Shawn Linderman 11509 Nicole Court Carmel, IN 46032 Nickolas & Diana L. Hein 11686 Oak Tree Way Carmel, IN 46032 William A. & Zoe A. Booker 10303 N. Park Carmel, IN 46032 Christopher & Ann Coffey 2209 Pebble Beach Drive Cannel, IN 46032 JJ & Fabiana James 129 Pine Drive Indianpolis, IN 46260 J. Daniel Philpott 2115 Pinehurst Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Doug & Mary Thompson 9650 Prairiewood Way Carmel, IN 46032 Diana & Peter L. Winters, M.D. 1591 Preston Trail Carmel, IN 46032 Clint N. & Lizette S. Wallack 1518 Prestwick Circle Carmel, IN 46032 Jim & Miffi James 1647 Prestwick Carmel, IN 46032 Arnold & Toby Siegel 11393 Royal Circle Carmel, IN 46032 Craig & Shelly Schiebert 11261 Royal Court Carmel, IN 46032 Marcia Regenstrief 11348 Royal Place Carmel, IN 46032 Jim C.& Alicia Crane 1730 Royalton Drive Cannel, IN 46032 John C. McCaeg 2028 St. Andrews Circle Carmel, IN 46032 Richard & Lila D. Morris 11124 St. Andrews Lane Carmel, IN 46032 Mike & Lori Robblns 11342 St. Andrews Lane Cannel, IN 46032 Richard & Lila D. Morris 11124 St. Andrews Lane Carmel, IN 46032 Brace & Ann Dufour 11158 St. Andrews Lane Carmel, IN 46032 Mike & Lori Robbins 11342 St. Andrews Lane Cannel, IN 46032 Jim & Judy Cosgrove 11355 St. Andrews Lane Cannel, IN 46032 Robert & Donna Copeland 11585 N. Shelbome Road Carmel, IN 46032 Patrick & Diane Healey 11062 Spring Mill Lane Carmel, IN 46032 Robert & Mary Bookwalter .............. 12430 Spring Mill Road Carmel, IN 46032 Kathryn L. Perry 341 Spring Ridge Ct Carmel, IN 46032 Ernest & Jan Glaser 1764 Summerlakes Court Carmel, IN 46032 Robert S. Bailey 9628 Summerlakes Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Mike & Karen Schanderman 9927 Summerlakes Drive Carmel, IN 46032 James & Belinda Arnold 312 Sunblest Blvd. S. Fishers, IN 46038 John & Karen Bereman 2503 Sutton Avenue Carmel, IN 46032 Robert & Meridy Thom 2542 Sutton Avenue Carmel, IN 46032 Gary K.& Janice Walker 9708 Sycamore Road Carmel, IN 46032 Robert & Patricia Ware 10840 Tam O'Shanter Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Robert & Patricia Ware 10840 Tam O'Shanter Drive Cannel, IN 46032 Ray & Linda Martin 7250 Tappan Drive Indianapolis, IN 46268 Clarence O. & Ruth A. Anderson 10829 Thunderbird Drive Cannel, IN 46032 Donald L. Wilson, MD 10624 Torrey Pines Circle Carmel, IN 46032 Sanford & Kathleen Kunkel 10703 Torrey Pines Circle Cannel, IN 46032 Richard & Rachel Cohen 10748 Torrey Pines Circle Carmel, IN 46032 Stephen & Susan L. Kraabel 10775 Torrey Pines Circle Carmel, IN 46032 Joel C. & Thalia D. Hammond 10785 Torrey Pines Circle Carmel, IN 46032 Daniel L. & Nancy K. Elliott 11168 Valeside Crescent Cannel, 1N 46032 Robert & Carole Steck 10215 Washington Blvd. Indianapolis, IN 46280 John H. & June Haskin 10602 Winterwood Carmel, IN 46032 Gordon & Jo Ann Graham 10633 Winterwood Carmel, IN 46032 Mr. & Mrs Jerry Gershman 10621 Winterwood Carmel, IN 46032 Jack H.& Audrey Laraman 10665 Winterwood Cannel, IN 46032 August M. Watanabe,MD 10666 Winterwood Carmel, IN 46032 Annie Coker 9712 N. Towne Road Carmel 1N 46032 Wendell & Cecilia Hollingworth 9712 N. Towne Road Carmel, IN 46032 Ray F. & Lisa S. Childers 9750 Towne Road Carmel, IN 46032 Kathy Betelak 9765 Towne Road Carmel IN 46032 Ken L. & Nancy Army 9850 N. Towne Road Carmel, IN 46032 Clara B. Green 9902 Towne Road Carmel, IN 46032 William A. Price 9911 Towne Road Carmel IN 46032 Harry M. Sanders, M.D. 9930 Towne Road Carmel, IN 46032 Lester & Helen Castor 10215 Towne Road Carmel, IN 46032 James & Louise Altum 10297 Towne Road Carmel 1N 46032 Thomas & Louise W. Moretto 11246 Towne Road Carmel, IN 46032 James E. & Tammie Fisk 11550 Towne Road Carmel, IN 46032 Bill & Jeanne Dism 12511 Towne Road Carmel, IN 46032 Janet R. Spearo 12515 Towne Road Carmel, IN 46032 Teresa A. Boothe 10305 Towne Road Carmel, IN 46032 Robert & Sue Altum 10311 Towne Road Carmel, IN 46032 Neil & Carol Mack 10361 Towne Road Carmel, IN 46032 Martha & Carlyle A. Wilson, II 10411 Towne Road Carmel, IN 46032 Andy & Loft Wilson 10545 Towne Road Carmel, IN 46032 Thomas W. & Bonnie G. Riley 10800 Towne Road Carmel, IN 46032 Mark & Robin Hartman 13405 Towne Road Westfield, IN 46074 Thomas A. & Ellen Watson 13513 Towne Road Westfield, IN 46074 Gregory L. & Robi Pemberton 13525 Towne Road Westfield, IN 46074 Dave Soll~nberger 13689 Towne Road Westfield, IN 46074 David & Donna M. Williams 2628 Towne Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Allen & Alison Wright 3103 Towne Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Gary S. Jutto 2643 Towne Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Robert & Pat Spaller 2744 Towne Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Mr. & Mrs. Robert Dugan 2678 Towne Drive Carmel, IN 46032 David & Donna Williams 2628 Towne Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Hasam & Gamze Akay 2835 Towne Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Herbert C. & Elizabeth Doepken 2972 Towne Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Cynthia & David Palmer 1060 W. 106th Street Carmel, IN 46032 Mike & Becky Irons 2802 W. 96th Street Indianpaolis, IN 46268 Andy & Sheri Thomas 3202 W. 96th Street Indianapolis, IN 46268 Cynthia & David Palmer 1060 W. 106th Street Carmel, IN 46032 Robert Stauffer 3208 W. 96th Street Indianapolis, IN 46268 Loree Hildebrandt 3 l 11 W. 106th Street Carmel, IN 46032 Eric & Sally Blom 2000 W. 106th Street Cannel, IN 46032 Gary F. & Bette Anne Boyd 2255 W. 106th Street Carmel, IN 46032 Nicholas & Katherine Kestner 2123 W. 106th Street Carmel, IN 46032 Mr. & Mrs. Yale Rice, Jr. 3105 W. 106th Street Carmel, IN 46032 Stephen & Sharon Wlhte 3110 W. 106th Street Cannel, IN 46032 William David Bowman 3263 W. 106th Street Carmel, IN 46032 Nicholas & Traci Taylor 3265 W. 106th Street Carmel, IN 46032 Michael F. & Sandra S. Moran 1158 W. 106th Street Carmel, IN 46032 Doyt Cassel 1800 W. 106th Street Carmel, IN 46032 Boyd & Alice A. Hovde 1814 W. 106th Street Carmel, IN 46032 Raymond J. Schultz 3321 W. 106th Street Carmel, IN 46032 Linda Simon 2100 W. 106th Street Carmel, IN 46032 Shari Simon-Greenbay 2100 W. 106th Street Carmel, IN 46032 Dan Dalh 1060 W. 106th Street Carmel, 1N 46032 Gregory P. & Mary Blitz 2050 W. 106th Street Cannel, IN 46032 Loree Hildebrandt 3111 W. 106th Street Carmel, IN 46032 Frank L. & Gayle Cobb 401 E. 106th Street Indianapolis, IN 46280 Gearld & Jan Wahls 314 W. 107th Street Carmel, IN 46032 James Noland Jr., M.D. 770 W. 116th Street Carmel, 1N 46032 Lloyd & Helen M. Newkirk 2451 W. 116th Street Carmel, IN 46032 Richard & Jane Mockavak 1995 W. 116th Street Carmel, IN 46032 Thomas J. Fusk 2421 W. 116th Street Carmel, IN 46032 Y.S. & Dottie Takayoski 2501 W. ll6th Street Carmel, IN 46032 Thomas Johnson 1705 W. 116th Street Carmel, IN 46032 Reom Smuventura 1421 W. ll6th Street Carmel, IN 46032 L. Hamilton 1430 W. 116th Street Carmel, IN 46032 Phyllis Brown 3576 W. 116th street Carmel, IN 46032 John L. Beghim 3030 W. 131st Street Carmel, 1N 46032 Wendy Fortune Neal 2555 W. 131st Street Carmel, IN 46032 John A. Smith 2885 W. 131st Street Carmel, IN 46032 Donald A. Lasher 1720 W. 131st Street Carmel, IN 46032 Steven J. & Mindy Habig 1845 W. 131st Street Carmel, IN 46032 Rhonna L. Crook 2288 W. 136th Street Carmel, IN 46032 John Brown 2323 W. 141st Street Cannel, IN 46032 Owen & Ruth Hutson 2745 W. 146th Street Westfield, IN 46074 Phillip L. & Jill Pegram 2731 W. 146th Street Westfield, IN 46074 Robert & Susan Moran 3933 E. 191st Street Noblesville, IN 46060 Jay & Jan Shapiro 13180 Abbots Place Carmel, I N 46033 Steve L. & Angie Hall 1242 Amethyst Ct. Carmel, IN 46032 Judith Paris 12339 Amethyst Cimle Carmel, IN 46032 Gregory A. & Gladys E. Basch 3210 Armally Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Gerald J. Anderson 3150 Annally Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Ma~orie E. Stewart 3316 Annally Drive Cannel, IN 46032 Carl Luhte 3107 Annally Drive Cannel, IN 46032 Charles R. & Sharon Smoot 12083 AshcrofI Place Carmel, IN 46032 Prem & Saroj Sharma 2297 Augusta Lane Cannel, IN 46032 Pan-Yu & Hung-Ir Lai 2757 Bay Court Cannel, IN 46032 Mark & Pam Saxhaug 32 Bennett Cannel, IN 46032 Roger & Jeanne Lenke 10493 Bishop Circle Cannel, IN 46032 Christian & Molly L. Jaeger 9831 Brandon Court Carmel, IN 46032 Don E & Glenda Stanley 9820 Brandon Court Cannel, IN 46032 O.L. Mutchmore 9815 Brandon Court Cannel, IN 46032 Kellie Timberdale 12958 Brighton Carmel, IN 46032 Fred S. & Judy Lindsey 2218 Burning Tree Lane Carmel, IN 46032 Robert & Sue M. Claycombe 1805 Burning Tree Lane Carmel, 1N 46032 John Mordaeq 2112 Burning Tree Lane Carmel, 1N 46032 Val Mark 2112 Buming Tree Lane Carmel, IN 46032 Linda Mordoh 2112 Burning Tree Lane Carmel, 1N 46032 Mehmet Doner 2212 Burning Tree Lane Carmel, IN 46032 Joel & Debbie Epstein 2103 Burning Tree Lane Carmel, IN 46032 Mr. & Mrs. Tom J. Presutti 2213 Burning Tree Lane Carmel, IN 46032 Jack & Cynthia Davis 2123 Burning Tree Lane Carmel, IN 46032 Karma Yde 2117 Burning Tree Lane Carmel, IN 46032 Susan Wooldridge 2105 Burning Tree Lane Carmel, IN 46032 Jeff W. Mendes 2102 Bunting Tree Lane Carmel, IN 46032 Michael Mordoh 2016 Burning Tree Lane Cannel, IN 46032 Fred White 2106 Burning Tree Lane Carmel, IN 46032 David & Karen Gillum 2206 Burning Tree Lane Carmel, IN 46032 Mallah A. & Elaine F. Mordoh 2016 Burning Tree Lane Carmel, IN 46032 Lynn Chandler 2620 Chaseway Court Indianapolis, IN 46268 F. Carl & Sondra Dutede, Jr. 10577 Chatham Crt. Carmel, IN 46032 J.B. & Laura Defano 2781 Circle Ct. Carmel, IN 46032 Scott & Leslie Goodyear 1295 N. Claridge Way Carmel, IN 46032 Charles I. McCollum 1336 N. Claridge Way Carmel, IN 46032 Thomas E. & Megan Chandler 1315 N. Claxidge Way Carmel, IN 46032 James McGill & JK Fetters 1365 N. Claridge Way Carmel, IN 46032 James A.. Thompson 1323 N. Claridge Way Carmel, IN 46032 Lucius O. & Juan O. Hamilton II 11635 Clay Center Road Carmel, IN 46032 Edwardo Kevia 1189 Clay Springs Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Paul G.& Betty J. Smith 10427 Connaught Drive Carmel, 1N 46032 Dwight & Sue Lile 10508 Connaught Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Kathleen M. Baxter 10404 Connaught Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Kevin & April O'Cull 10447 Connaught Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Marry Miller 10388 Connaught Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Lyrm Hildebrandt 10442 Connaught Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Morris C. Rowlett 10596 Coppergate Carmel, IN 46032 Clark & Nancy Meeks Iverson 10592 Coppergate Carmel, IN 46032 Joseph L. & Beverly Kack 10575 Coppergate Cannel, IN 46032 Jose M. Bonnin 10546 Coppergate Carmel, IN 46032 Cheryl Watter 10571 Coppergate Carmel, IN 46032 Jerome H. & Marlene Fleisch 10532 Coppergate Carmel, IN 46032 Glen A. & Cynthia Branch 10564 Coppergate Carmel, IN 46032 Dale & Mary M. Scannell 501 Copley Place Indianapolis, IN 46290 Henry & Jan Aguet 540 Copley Place Indianapolis,IN 46290 Charles N. & Janet Howard 9601 Copley Drive Indianapolis, IN 46290 C. Thomas & Pamela E. Lambert 616 Copley Place Indianapolis, IN 46290 Richard McBroom 10770 Crooked Stick Lane Carmel IN 46032 Betsy Cohn 11177 Crooked Stick Tr. Carmel, IN 46032 Tom Hession 10850 Crooked Stick Lane Cannel, IN 46032 Carol Brewster Bogeyn 10850 Crooked Stick Lane Cannel IN 46032 Jean A. Lceper 10908 Crooked Stick Lane Carmel, IN 46032 Domenic & Pat Angelicchio 10740 Crooked Stick Lane Cannel, IN 46032 Christine Woodword-Duncan 10905 Crooked Stick Lane Carmel IN 46032 James E. & Vickie Doherty 11149 Crooked Stick Lane Cannel, IN 46032 Jordan & Ann Vukas 11840 Crossfields Ct. Carmel, IN 46032 James M. & Patricia A. Estep 2495 Crossfields Ct. Carmel IN 46032 Shirley M. Calhoun 9941 Culpepper Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Kent A. Miller 9950 Culpepper Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Neil N. Brook 9601 Deerfield Circle Carmel IN 46032 John J. Brook 9702 Deerfield Mall Carmel, IN 46032 Charles & Patricia Riley 9740 Deerfield Circle Carmel, IN 46032 John & Mary Patrieia Carey 9770 Deerfield Mall Carmel IN 46032 Anne BickeI 9808 Deerfield Circle Carmel, 1N 46032 Walter O. Farrell 9830 Deerfield Cimle Carmel, IN 46032 John S. Swaim 9821 Deerfield Circle Carmel IN 46032 Robert M. Hamlett 9810 Deerfield Cimle Carmel, 1N 46032 Fred Kelley 9800 Deerfield Mall Carmel, IN 46032 Randy & Jenifer Foxworthy 9999 Ditch Road Carmel IN 46032 Jerry & Joan Flynn 11024 Ditch Road Carmel, IN 46032 Suzanne S. Somers 10404 Ditch Road Cannel, IN 46032 Joe & Eleanor Lang 10714 Ditch Road Carmel IN 46032 Zelpha G. Corkem 14242 Ditch Road Westfield, IN 46074 Rose Mary & Savas Mallos 11140 Ditch Road Carmel, IN 46032 L.D. Foster 11590 Ditch Road Carmel IN 46032 Donald J. Merlo 11845 Durbin Drive Carmel, IN 46032 William & Victoria R. Rate 11905 Durbin Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Thomas $. & Linda M. Carroll 11935 Durbin Drive Carmel IN 46032 Mr. & Mrs. Donald Denger 12020 Durbin Drive Carmel, 1N 46032 Charles & Sara C. Scott 12040 Durbin Drive Carmel, IN 46032 G-reg & Nancy Socha 12060 Durbin Drive Carmel IN 46032 Rebecca Farmer 2475 Durbin Drive Cannel, IN 46032 Gregory J. & Virginia V. Hahn 2565 Durbin Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Terry & Teresa Crockett 3352 Eden Way Cimle Carmel IN 46033 Kermit & Karen Gasche 9710 Elm Drive Cannel, IN 46032 John & Karey L. Cummings 11197 Estancia Way Carmel, IN 46032 Mr. & Mrs. Navio Occhialini 9750 Elm Drive Cannel, IN 46032 Joseph E. Pauley 3202 Fairway Drive Cannel, IN 46032 Nancy Thompson 11116 Estancia Way Carmel IN 46032 Donald A. & Cathy Rowe 3221 Fairway Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Walter H. Dehmel 3231 Fairway Drive Cannel, IN 46032 Tim & Lori Luzadales 10444 Fergus Avenue Cannel, IN 46032 Renee E. Martin-Rich 10445 Fergus Avenue Carmel, IN 46032 David s. & Peggy L. Board 10506 Fergus Avenue Carmel, IN 46032 Michael & Kelly Rhoades 10435 Fergus Avenue Carmel IN 46032 Mary Monical 10526 Fergus Avenue Carmel IN 46032 Donny Purd 11617 Forest Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Martin F. Lipp 10839 Greenbrier Drive Carmel IN 46032 George E. & Glenda C. Bradford 10919 Greenbrier Drive Carmel IN 46032 JoAnn Kohler 10925 Greenbrier Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Donald C. Frazer I 1007 Greenbrier Drive Carmel IN 46032 John H. & Bernice C. Hunter 11011 Greenbrier Drive Carmel IN 46032 Mary A. Braken 10545 Greentree Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Dorris A. Tuccio 9645 Greentree Drive Carmel IN 46032 Tim J. Barry 9878 Greentree Drive Carmel IN 46032 Dave & Nan Pazdemik 10515 Greentree Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Greg & Pam Plantenga 10530 Greentree Drive Carmel IN 46032 Gary S. & Cecelia Weiss 10555 Greentree Drive Carmel IN 46032 John R. Emry 10560 Greentree Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Richard A. & Wilma E. Cohee 10565 Greentree Drive Carmel IN 46032 David Bush & Chrystal Towney 10585 Greentree Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Katherine B. McKinney 1425 Gwynmere Run Carmel, IN 46032 Douglas E. Groswald 1468 Gwynmere Run Carmel IN 46032 David J. Cutshaw 1209 Helford Lane Carmel, IN 46032 Joe Perkins 1261 Helford Lane Carmel, IN 46032 John M. & Para Glazic 1285 Helford Lane Carmel IN 46032 Andrew DeNardo 1286 Helford Lane Carmel, IN 46032 Greg & Lara Lord 1345 Helford Lane Carmel, IN 46032 Dane & Bev Love 12011 Hoover Road Cannel IN 46032 Harry W. & Constance C. Earle 10400 Hussey Lane Carmel, IN 46032 Mr. & Mrs. Thomas M. Miller, Jr. 10530 Hussey Lane Carmel, IN 46032 Dr. Daniel M. Leinard 10534 Hussey Lane Carmel IN 46032 Carol Sehlief 10517 Hyde Park Carmel, IN 46032 Mark & Karen Ehrman 10518 Hyde Park Carmel, IN 46032 William R. & Terri Finkelmeier 10566 Hyde Park Carmel, IN 46032 Stan Thompson 3587 Larkspur Lane Carmel, IN 46032 Walter G. Justus 1101 Laurelwood Carmel, 1N 46032 David N & Jane. Price 1141 Laurelwood Carmel, IN 46032 Weldon T. Egan 1255 Laurelwood Carmel, IN 46032 Susan M. Waasnam 11609 Oak Tree Way Carmel, IN 46032 Gary M. Apter 2974 Palace Court Carmel, IN 46032 Bob Floyd 2116 Pebble Beach Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Arthur Levin 2122 Pebble Beach Carmel, IN 46032 Monica Leonard Huber 10529 Hyde Park Carmel, IN 46032 Jack A. Wodock 10658 Jewel Lane Carmel, 1N 46032 William A. Young 1089 Laurelwood Carmel, IN 46032 Shirley Kahn 1138 Laurelwood Carmel, IN 46032 Carol & Dr. Jay Weiss 1148 Laurelwood Carmel, IN 46032 Steve & KLm Jolmson 2310 Lincoln Drive Cicero, IN 46034 Dean & Carole Kimsey 11612 Oak Tree Way Carmel, 1N 46032 Roger & Caren L. Wolf 2979 Palace Court Carmel, IN 46032 Christopher & Ann Coffey 2209 Pebble Beach Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Scott M. Wharton 12535 Pembrooke Circle Carmel, IN 46032 Paul D. & Carol S. Belden 10554 Hyde Park Carmel, IN 46032 Dale & Cheri Hammer 10725 Kings Mill Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Larry F. Heck 1098 Laurelwood Carmel, IN 46032 Thomas E. O'Brien 1140 Laurelwood Carmel, IN 46032 David A. & Deborah W. Vondle 1149 Laurelwood Carmel, IN 46032 Jeff & Shawn Linderman 11509 Nicole Court Carmel, IN 46032 Nickolas & Diana L. Hein 11686 Oak Tree Way Carmel, IN 46032 William A. & Zoe A. Booker 10303 N. Park Carmel, IN 46032 Beth A. Maudlin 2113 Pebble Beach Drive Carmel, IN 46032 JJ & Fabiana James 129 Pine Drive Indianpolis, IN 46260 Alvin M. Mordoh Pala Louvy 2105 Pinehurst Drive Carmel, IN 46032 William L. Galhyl 2114 Pinehurst Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Bob & Nancy Bennett 2106 Pinehurst Drive Carmel, IN 46032 J. Daniel Philpott 2115 Pinehurst Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Mr. & Mrs. Neil R. Hottle 2111 Pinehurst Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Vincent P. Johnson 2117 Pinehurst Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Jerry Feldhahn 2118 Pinehurst Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Roger Bradley 2211 Pinehurst Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Doug & Mary Thompson 9650 Prairiewood Way Carmel, IN 46032 Stephen W. Perkins 1503 Preston Trail Carmel, IN 46032 Diana & Peter L. Winters, M.D. 1591 Preston Trail Carmel, IN 46032 R.J. & Susan Noble 1514 Prestwick Circle Carmel, IN 46032 Clint N. & Lizette S. Wallack 1518 Prestwick Circle Carmel, IN 46032 Jim & Miffi James 1647 Prestwick Carmel, IN 46032 Jim & Cheryl Bmggenschmidt 11374 Royal Circle Carmel, IN 46032 Arnold & Toby Siegel 11393 Royal Circle Carmel, IN 46032 Marcia Regenstrief 11348 Royal Place Carmel, IN 46032 Craig & Shelly Schiebert 11261 Royal Court Carmel, IN 46032 James Burch 1630 Royalton Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Kinley Upton 1649 Royalton Drive Carmel, 1N 46032 Herbert T & Frances J. Sands 1660 Royalton Drive Carmel, 1N 46032 Jim C.& Alicia Crane 1730 Royalton Drive Carmel, IN 46032 John C. McCaeg 2028 St. Andrews Circle Carmel, IN 46032 Richard & Lila D. Morris 11124 St. Andrews Lane Carmel, IN 46032 Mike & Lori Robbins 11342 St. Andrews Lane Carmel, IN 46032 Brace & Ann Dufour 11158 St. Andrews Lane Carmel, IN 46032 Jim & Judy Cosgrove 11355 St. Andrews Lane Carmel, IN 46032 Raymond F, Kauffman 11420 St. Andrews Lane Carmel, IN 46032 David J. & Martha Black 3463 Sedgemoor Circle Carmel, IN 46032 Richard & Pamela Biggerstaff 3484 Sedgemoor Circle Carmel, IN 46032 Ronald D. Hunter 3570 Sedgemoor Circle Carmel, IN 46032 Robert & Donna Copeland 11585 N. Shelbome Road Carmel, IN 46032 Lan'y & Shirley Gollmer 11615 Shelbome Road Carmel, IN 46032 Aaron & Lisa O'Cull 11685 Shelbome Road Carmel, IN 46032 Thurman W. & Erma F. Leatherman 11718 Shelbome Road Carmel, IN 46032 Ken & Jan Wilson 12823 Shelbome Road Carmel, IN 46032 Herb & Nancy Bussa 12701 Shelbome Road Carmel, IN 46032 Don Harluse 14221 Shelbome Road Westfield, IN 46074 Patrick & Diane Healey 11062 Spring Mill Lane Carmel, IN 46032 Elizabeth Casalini 11920 Spring Mill Road Carmel, IN 46032 Robert & Mary Bookwalter .............. 12430 Spring Mill Road Carmel, IN 46032 Eleanor Bookwalter 12510 Spring Mill Road Cannel, IN 46032 K~hrynL. Pen'y 341SpringRidge Ct Carmel, IN46032 Darin & Kerry Hutson 328 Stonehedge Drive Carmel, 1N 46032 Ernest & Jan Glaser 1764 Summerlakes Court Carmel, 1N 46032 Kenneth Sun 1826 Summerlakes Court Carmel, IN 46032 Brace Matt 1891 Summerlakes Court Carmel, IN 46032 Robert S. B~ley 9628 Summerlakes Drive Carmel, IN46032 Chris Obeime 9742 Summerlakes Drive Carmel, IN46032 William E. Mitchell 9922 Summerlakes Drive Carmle, IN 46032 Mike & Karen Schanderman 9927 Summerlakes Drive Carmel, IN 46032 James & Belinda Arnold 312 Sunblest Blvd. S. Fishers, IN 46038 John&Karen Bereman 2503 Sutton Avenue Carmel, IN46032 Doli E. Biondillo 2513 Sutton Place Drive S. Carmel, IN 46032 Andrew & Chris Chan 2528 Su~on Avenue Carmel, IN46032 Mureena Tumquest 2538 Sutton Avenue Carmel, IN 46032 Robert&Meridy Thom 2542 Su~onAvenue Carmel, iN46032 Steve Weinberg 2561 Sutton Plaee Drive S. Carmel, IN46032 Ronghui Ji & Yurt Liang 2563 Sutton Avenue Carmel, 1N 46032 Greg & Nancy Michaelsen 11478 Sutton Place Drive W. Carmel, IN 46032 Gary K.& Janice Walker 9708 Sycamore Road Carmel, 1N 46032 Robert & Patricia Ware 10840 Tam O'Shanter Drive Carmel IN 46032 Mark & Sara Perlstein 10907 Tam O'Shanter Drive Cannel, IN 46032 Terry R. Bayer 11018 Tam O'Shanter Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Kenneth & Kae Mentz 2209 Tam O'Shanter Court Carmel IN 46032 Mr. & Mrs. Karl C. Kohgteyl 2215 Tam O'Shanter Court Carmel, IN 46032 Wayne & Rhonda Sutphen 2218 Tam O'Shanter Court Carmel, IN 46032 Allen J. & Marcia Surf 2219 Tam O'Shanter Court Carmel IN 46032 Karen Paterson 2212 Tam O'Shanter Court Cannel IN 46032 Ray & Linda Martin 7250 Tappan Drive Indianapolis, IN 46268 Clarence O. & Ruth A. Anderson 10829 Thunderbird Drive Carmel IN 46032 Harvey & Debra Move 10924 Thunderbird Drive Carmel IN 46032 Mr. & Mrs. Darrel Miller 10929 Thunderbird Drive Carmel, 1N 46032 James R. Draper 11005 Thunderbird Drive Carmel IN 46032 Jeff& Karen Grund 12004 Thunderbird Drive Carmel IN 46032 Donald L. Wilson,MD 10624 Torrey Pines Circle Carmel, IN 46032 Sanford & Kathleen Kunkel 10703 Torrey Pines Circle Carmel IN 46032 Mr. & Mrs. Randall W. Sencaj 10730 Torrey Pines Circle Carmel IN 46032 Richard & Rachel Cohen 10748 Torrey Pines Circle Cannel, IN 46032 Thomas M. & Mary Rouse 10757 Torrey Pines Circle Carmel IN 46032 Stephen & Susan L. Kraabel 10775 Torrey Pines Circle Carmel IN 46032 Joel C. & Thalia D. Hammond 10785 Torrey Pines Circle Carmel, IN 46032 George & Cheryl Land 10443 Trewithen Lane Cannel IN 46032 Daniel L. & Nancy K. Elliott 11168 Valeside Crescent Carmel IN 46032 Mike & Chris Walsh 10629 Walnut Creek Carmel, IN 46032 Mason R. Goodman 3301 Walnut Creek Dr. N. Carmel IN 46032 Joseph & Susan Hughes 3403 Walnut Creek Carmel IN 46032 Sarah H. Kevia 10646 Walnut Creek W. Carmel, IN 46032 Robert & Carole Steck 10215 Washington Blvd. Indianapolis, IN 46280 John H. & June Haskin 10602 Winterwood Carmel IN 46032 Barry S. Baer 10610 Winterwood Carmel, IN 46032 Gordon & Jo Ann Graham 10633 Winterwood Carmel, IN 46032 Tom R. Miller 10641 Winterwood Carmel, IN 46032 Nick Hrisomalos 10649 Winterwood Carmel, IN 46032 Mr. & Mrs Jerry Gershman 10621 Winterwood Carmel, IN 46032 Harvey Feigenbaum 10625 Winterwood Carmel, IN 46032 Charles & Karyn Prine 10650 Winterwood Carmel, IN 46032 Jack H.& Audrey Laraman 10665 Winterwood Carmel, IN 46032 August M. Watanabe,MD 10666 Winterwood Carmel, IN 46032 Michael. Cannon 1522 Woodlake Court Carmel, IN 46032 Bill & Catherine Donaldson 1530 Woodlake Court Cannel, IN 46032 Dave - Here are the signed sides of the petitions that have come in so far (August 5). As of this date, there are 194 names, many of which are husband and wife. On August 16, I will turn in all the originals of the petitions that come in. Thanks, Bud through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the ama. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that deiineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria wilt assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116"' Street and Towne Road and 116"' Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME Please retain a copy for your files ADDRESS P:~ReasonableRRC~P~ I I I ION 96 final.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that deiineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteda will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~h Street and Towne Road and 116~h Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~ReasonableRRCU°ETrrlON 96 final.wpcl through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commemial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116"' Street and Towne Road and 116"' Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:'~Reason ableRRC~PETITION 96 final.wp~l through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot dghts of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116a Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:IReasonableRRC~P ETn3ON 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteda will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the westem Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116t~ Street and Towne Road and 116a Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME. Please retain a copy for your files ADDRESS P:~ReasonableRRC~P ,~ ¥1 a'tON 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot dghts of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteda will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000.000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116th Street and Towne Road and 116th Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. Please retain a copy for your files ADDRESS P:~Rea sona bier RC~PI:: I I I ION 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significaptly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2.000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116th Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~J~easonableRRC~PETITION 96 flnal.v~pd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that deiineate'and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significa.ntly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your suppOrt of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME Please retain a copy for your files ADDRESS P :~easonableRRC~P ETITION 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot dghts of way, Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that d~iineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteda set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116"~ Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME Please retain ~ ~op~ for ~our ADDRESS P:~ReasonableRRC~PETJllON 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not afl, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay; 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discoura{]es commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteda can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Spdngmill and 116~' Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME Please retain a copy for your files ADDRESS P:~easona bIeRRC~PETI31ON 96 final.Wl3d through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteda will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design cdteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~h Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. PraiHeweod .W_ay ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~ReasonableRRC~PE1TTION 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~' Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~Reasona bleRRC~t:ii~lOH 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all. of the ama. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot dghts of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteda can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116th Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. , NAME // Please retain a copy for your files ADDRESS through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the westem Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for imprevement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116t~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~Rea$onableRROPETITION 96 flnal,wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116"` Street and Towne Road and 116"' Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME Please retain a copy for your files ADDRESS P:UReasonableRRC~PET]TION 96 final.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Ehtry ways into The Community of West Clay that deiineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discoure~es commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~' Street and Towne Road and 116~' Street intersections. )ur support of this petition is earnestly solicited. retain a copy for your files ~ -' ~ - ADDRESS through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West ClaY. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that d(~iineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteda can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteda set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~' Street and Towne Road and 116th Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME Please retain a copy for your files ADDRESS P:tReasonabIeRRCIPETITION 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that d~iineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, sPecial landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design cdteda can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~' Street and Towne Road and 116~h Street intersections. Please retain a coF, suppo -r["(; his petition is earnestly solicited. /., ADDRESS ~r your files P:~ReasonableRRC~Pc a s ~iON 96 finaf,wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area, Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteda will assist significantly in preserving the upscale res dential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~h Street and Towne Road and 116~' Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME Please retain a copy for your file~./ ADDRESS P:~Rea$onable RRC~PET~TION 96 Ilnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot dghts of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that deiineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas ara desirable objectives. Judicious 'use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considerad. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design cdteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the araa and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed", Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in censtmction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~ Straet and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is 'earnestly solicited. Please retain a copy~tey.~our files P:t, Rea sona bleRRC*~I=~ ~ ~ ION 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intemection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significa~ntly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME Please retain a copy for your files P:~ea$onableRRC~,t=¥;i ~ON 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that deiineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteda can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116a Street and Towne Road and 116th Street intersections. Your support of this petition-is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~ReasonableRRC~P~ I I ! ION 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that deiineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116th Street and Towne Road and 116t~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earneStly soliCited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~ReasonableRRC~Pi- I~l'~ON 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot dghts of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that d~iineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteda can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteda set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~' Street and Towne Road and 116~' Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:g~easonableRRC1PIEn11ON 96 final.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not afl, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that deiineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4, Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in presen~ing the upsoale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to lend use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000~000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoptio~ of reasonel~e design c~ite~ia can Save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% In construction costs, A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that ~he oriteria set fo~h herein be adopted as the standard for the intemections in West Clay, and partJculady at the Springmill and 116~' S~eet and Towne Road and 116~' Street intersections. Your,support of this petition is earnestly solicited. _NAMI~ Ple~mtain a copy for your files ADDRESS through the year 2020 in most, if not ail, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116th Street and Towne Road and 116th Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. ADDRESS t' Please retain a copy for your files P:~ReasonableRRCVPETITION 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the ama. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West ClaY. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that de'iineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteda set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Spdngmill and 116"' Street and Towne Road and 116t~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. /~NAME , Please retain a copy for your files ADDRESS P:~easonableRRC~P ETITION 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteda will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteda set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116th Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME Pleas[e retain a copy for your files ADDRESS p:~,Rea sonableRR C~P ETFrlON 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteda will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design cdteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the cdteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116"' Street and Towne Road and 1 Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot dghts of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay,. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay ama as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of.$200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116t~ Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. ADDRES~ Please retain a copy for your files through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot dghts of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116th Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. Please retain a copy for your files ADDRESS P:~ReasonableRRC~P ETITION 96 final.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are ".Ove~; Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking'and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. ~ We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116th Street and Tewne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME Please retain a copy for your files ADDRESS P:lReasona bleRRC~PETmON 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that deiineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. ,Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116t~ Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME Plea~se retain'a copy("~or your;les ADDRESS P:U~easo~ableRRC~PETITION 96 flnal,wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that d~iineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~' Street and Towne Road and 116~' Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~Reasona bleRRC~PETITION 96 final.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that d~iineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discoura~les commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly'at the Springmill.and 116~' Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. Please retain a copy for your files ADDRESS P:~Rea$onableRRC~P ETITION 96 firlal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significa.n, tly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116"' Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME Please retain a copy for your files ×_23 ADDRESS P:~ReasonableRRC~P=; ~iON 96 flnal.wlxl through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the ama. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot dghts of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that deiineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significa.ntly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Spdngmill and 116~' Street and Towne Road and 1160' Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~,easonableRRC~PETI'IION 96 flnal.wl~ through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that deiineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significa..ntly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and =on!rig designs for t~ vcestem Clay area as ~elated to ;and use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116~' Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. Please retain a copy for your files ADDRESS ! P:iReason a bleRRC%PETITiON 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot dghts of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that de~neate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, Special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the ama and discoura~ .es commercial, business and industrial activity. 5, Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and'. zoning designs for. the western Clay ama as related to land use. 6. {ntersections 'as pr~pesed, Cost anywhere from $2,'0001000.00 t~ $3;000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonabie design.criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs~ A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the tenor mom intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth heroin be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and parlioularly at the Springmill and 116= Street and Towne Road and 116=. Street intersections. yoUr-sUpPort*Of this 'petition is earnestly solicited. ' *' ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot dghts of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that del"ineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000;00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forlh herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116"~ Street and Towne Road and 116~h Street intersections. Your support of th!s petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:l~easona bleRRC~Pr, iiliON 96 final.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that deiineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design cdteda will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 1.16t' Street and Towne Road and 116t' Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ,. ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3, Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that del'ineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design cdteda will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116th Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the ama. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design cdteda will assist significa..ntly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particulariy at the Springmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116~h Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ~eease retain a cop~ffol~'your files ADDRESS P:~lReasonableRRC~Pr. ~[iON 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that deiineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related-to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116"' Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. ADDRESS t'- ' (- ( Please retain a copy for your files P:lRea$onableRRC~PE'l~ I~ON 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that deiineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections. as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Spfingmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~easonableRRC~PETITION 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteda will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the cdteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Spdngmill and 116th Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of thiS petition is earnestly solicited. ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files through the year'2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that deiineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Sprlngmill and 116~h Street and Towne Road and 116th Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:lRea sonableR RC~PETITION 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that d~iineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteda will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5, Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design cdteda can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~' Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. 0/NAME ' Please retain a copy for your files P:~ReasonableRRC~ i i liON 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the ama. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that deiineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use~ 6. intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to '$3,000,000.00 each. They ara "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herain be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~' Street and Towne Road and 116a Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that deiineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteda will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commemial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. InterSections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000~000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They ara "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~h Street and Towne Road and 116~h Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited.. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~Reasonab~eRRC~PETITION 96 flnal,wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay~ 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that d~l'ineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discoura{les commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteda set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116th Street and Towne Road and 116th Street intersections. Your support of this Petition is earnestly solicited. Please retain a copy for your files P;~easo~lableRRCt, Pt;T il'ION 96 final.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that deiineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria wile assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost any~vhere from $2~000,000.00 to $3,000~000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your-support of this petition is earnestly solicited, NAME Please retain a copy for your files ADDRESS P:~Reaso~ableRRC~PETITION 96 flnaLwpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay, 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that del'ineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives, Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upsca e residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. intersections,' as proposed, cost anyWhere from $2,000;000.00 tb $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~' Street and Towne Road and 116= Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. ,-ADDRESS through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay: 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that d(~lineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criterJa set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~' Street and Towne Road and 116~' Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. 'V ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~Rea$o~a bleRRC~PETmON 96 final.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significa..ntly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~ReasonableRRC1PETITION 96 finaLwpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entn/way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~Rea s on able RRC'~pETITION 96 finaLwpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot dghts of way, Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that d~l'ineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discoura~ies commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteda can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~' Street and Towne Road and 116a Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that deiineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteda set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~ReasonableRRC~Pc i ~ ~ ~ON 96 linal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that d&iineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives, Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4, Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116"' Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~Rea$orm bleRRC~Pi= i i IION 96 final.vq3d through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot dghts of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significa.ntiy in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116a Street and Towne Road and 1 Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area, Collector roadways should provide for 70 · foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria .will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteda can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the cfiteda set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116"' Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME Please reta~a copy for your files P:~ReasonableRRC~P~ ~ ~ ~ iON 96 anaLwpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 ' foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that deiineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative enby way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should .be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria.will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~' Street and Towne Road and 116th Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. ,~ NAME , ~ ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~ReasonableRRC'~PE% ~ 3 ~ON 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~h Street and Towne Road and 1166' Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~ReasonableRRC~PETITION 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot dghts of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116t~ Street and Towne Road and 116th Street intersections. Your sUpport ofthis petition is earnestly solicited. NAME Please retain a copy for your files P:'~ReasonabIeRRC!PETITION 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that deiineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design cdteda will assist signiflca..ntly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~' Street and Towne Road and 116t~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME Please retain a co;y ~flles ADDRESS P:~ReasonableRRC~P ETIllON 96 flnal.wlxl through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that deiineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intemection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~' Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME Please retain a copy for your files ADDRESS P:~easonableRRClPETI13ON g6 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all. of the ama. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that deiineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markem, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significentJy in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and disceura~es commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteda set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intemections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections, Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4, Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and disceura~es commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Sprlngmill and 116t~ Street and Towne Road and 116= Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~Reaso.a bleRRC~PETITION 96 final.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the ama. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significa..ntly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteda can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteda set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. Please retain a copy for your files P:~ReasonableRRC~Pt= ii~JON 96 flnal.l~od i~ % o through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that d~iineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives, Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity, 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~h Street and Towne Road and 116~' Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:U~easonableRRC~PETI11ON 96 final.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that de!ineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design cdteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6, Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116t~ Street and Towne Road and 116th Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME Please retain a copy for your files ADDRESS P:~J~easonabieRRC~P ETITION 96 flnal.wlxl through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design cdteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the westem Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116= Street and Towne Road and 116= Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME Please retain a copy for your files ADDRESS through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significaDtly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116t~ Street and Towne Road and 116"~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS I I Please retain a copy for your files P:~ReasonabIeRRC~PIETITION 96 final,wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly n preserving the upsca e residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteda set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116t' Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~Reasona ble RRC~PETITION 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commemial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over theten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Spdngmill and 116th Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME P:~Rea$onableRRC~PETITION 96 final,w~ through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They ara "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~Reasona bleRR C~PETITION 96 final,wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design cdteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or mom intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Spdngmill and 116t' Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~ea$onableRRC~PETITION 96 final.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that d~lineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteda will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteda set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Spdngmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME Please retain a copy for your files ADDRESS P:~ReasonableR RC~P ETITION 96 finaLwpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the cdteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116"' Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~Rea son a bleRRC~PE~TION 96 final.wp<] through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area, Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Spdngmill and 116t~ Street and Towne Road and 116t~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~Rea sonableR RC~P ETITION 96 flflal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commemial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for tl~e western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116th Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~ReasonableRRC~P E-I1TION 96 flnal.wl3d through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the ama. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design cdteda will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design cdteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Spdngmill and 116t' Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. Please retain a copy for your files ADDRESS P:~Rea sona bleRRC~PETITION 96 final.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116th Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ~/~,ease retain a c~opy'Z~-~o~r yoV'~u7 ~les ADDRESS P:~Rea$onableRRC~P ETITION 96 flnal,wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteda will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteda can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteda set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116"~ Street and Towne Road and 116"~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~Reasona bleRRCtPETTTION 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all. of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at theSpringmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 1 Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. Please retain a copy for your files ADDRESS P :~Reasonable RRC~PETIT1 ON 96 final.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot dghts of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteda will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. A .~AME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~Rea$ona bleRRC~PETFnON 96 flnal,wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot dghts of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the westem Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteda set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116th Street and Towne Road and 116th Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~ReasonableRRC~PETITION 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. ~.~~ ~: 4. Our Pr, oposed adequate, ye~derated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in pr.e,s~rving the upscale ~j~idential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and in'dustdal activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteda can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300 000 per intersection. A savings of $2~ to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improVement. We ask that the cdteda set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particuiady at the Spdngmill and 116th Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME Please retain a copy for your files ADDRESS P:~ReasonableRR C~PETITION 96 final.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that deiineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116~' Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~ReasonableRRC~PE'nTION 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot dghts of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116th Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~easonableRRC~PETITION 96 flnal,wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116t~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. .NAME Please retain a copy for your files ADDRESS P:~ReasonableRRC~P ETITION 96 final.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~' Street and Towne Road and 116t' Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME Please retain a copy for your files ADDRESS P:tReasonableRROPETITION 9~ flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas ara desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considerad. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the araa and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our raquest is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the westem Clay araa as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They ara "Over Designed". Adoption of raasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116th Street and Towne Road and 116= Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. Please retain a copy for your files ADDRESS P:~teasollableRRC~PT: 111 ION 96 tirol.will through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that deiineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design cdteda will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 1 Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. Please retain a copy for your files ADDRESS P:%~easonableRRC~Pl= I I I ION 96 final.will 995 88:27 3178466389 THERAPIST'S OHOICE PAGE 81 )ugh the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area, Collector roadways shoul~ provide for 70 t rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay 3, Enid' ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's al residential areas ara desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers. ractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be nsidered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteda will assist gnificantly in pres®tying the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and scourages commercial, business and industrial activity, 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and oning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 .'ach. They ars "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much is 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to ~300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections ~rojected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay. and particularly at the Springmill and 116m Street and Towne Road and 116"' Street intersections, Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. ADDRESS through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria wilt assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~Reasona bleRRC~PETI~ON 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commemial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Spdngmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116t~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~ReasonableRRC~P ETITION 96 final.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design cdteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116th Street and Towne Road and 116= Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. " Please retain a copy for your files ADDRESS P:~easonableR RC~P ETITION 96 final.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot dghts of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Ciay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteda will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $$M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS 1080o -)'E w e Please retain a copy for your files P:~Reason ableRRC~P ETITION 96 flnal,wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commeroiai, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the cdtada set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116"~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. Please retain a copy for your files Mr. & Mr~ Rob~u ]]~42 SL A~drew~ ADDRESS P:~ReasonableRRCIPETITION 96 finaLwpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design cdteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the westem Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116~' Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ... ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:t.~ea sona bleRRCIPETITION 96 final.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered..-- 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteda can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteda set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Spdngmill and 116"~ Street and Towne Road and 116t' Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~'Rea$onableRRC~PETITIO N 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that d~lineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significa.ntly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmiii and 116"' Street and Towne Road and 116~h Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. P:UReasonableRRC~PETITION 96 finat.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteda can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116th Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~Reason able RRC~P ETITION 96 final.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116t~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~,Rea sona bleRRC~PETITION 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the westem Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design cdteda can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200;000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116th Street and Towne Road and 116th Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME Please retain a copy for your files ADDRESS P:~Rea sonableRRCtPETITION 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that d~lineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the westem Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and padiculady at the Springmill and 116"~ Street and Towne Road and 116t~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. . NA~EM . ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:tReasonableRRC~PETITION 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significp, ntly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections ~n West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116t~ Street and Towne Road and 116th Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~ReasonableRRC',F'~,l I; ION 96 finaLw~ through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Spdngmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116th Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~Reasona ble RRC~P E3tTION 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that deiineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~h Street and Towne Road and 116= Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~q[easona hie RRC'~I:'~; I Il'ION 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteda can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteda set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116"~ Street and Tewne Road and 116th Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:tReasonableRRC~P ETITIO N 96 final.wlxI through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that deiineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discoura{]es commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, COst anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteda set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~h Street and Towne Road and 116th Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:t, ReasonableRRC~E I J I ION 96 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~h Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files p:~ReasonableRRC~PETmON 96 final.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that d(~iineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. JUdicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discoura{]es commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116~' Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:~Reason a bleRRC~PETITION 96 flnal,wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that deiineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markem, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteda can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Spdngmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earneStly solicited. NAME Please retain a copy for your files ADDRESS P:~J;[easonableRRC~PIE'l [, ION 96 flnaLwpcl through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West ClaY. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that deiineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significa.ntly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages oommercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the westem Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten of more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~h Street and Towne Road and 116~h Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot dghts of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay. 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that deiineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significa..ntly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discourages commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in cOnstruction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the cdteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~' Street and Towne Road and 116t~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. ADDRESS Please retain a copy for your files P:lReasona bIeRRC~PEITI'ION g6 flnal.wpd through the year 2020 in most, if not all, of the area. Collector roadways should provide for 70 foot rights of way. Parkways should be eliminated in West Clay: 3. Entry ways into The Community of West Clay that delineate and protect West Clay's rural residential areas are desirable objectives. Judicious use of decorative entry way markers, attractive intersection designs, special landscaping and other devices of similar effect should be considered. 4. Our proposed adequate, yet moderated, roadway design criteria will assist significantly in preserving the upscale residential character and beauty of the area and discoura'~es commercial, business and industrial activity. 5. Our request is consistent with the established comprehensive planning and zoning designs for the western Clay area as related to land use. 6. Intersections, as proposed, cost anywhere from $2,000,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 each. They are "Over Designed". Adoption of reasonable design criteria can save as much as 30% in land taking and 10% to 15% in construction costs. A savings of $200,000 to $300,000 per intersection. A savings of $2M to $3M over the ten or more intersections projected for improvement. We ask that the criteria set forth herein be adopted as the standard for the intersections in West Clay, and particularly at the Springmill and 116~ Street and Towne Road and 116~ Street intersections. Your support of this petition is earnestly solicited. NAME Please retain a copy for your files ADDRESS P :~ReasonableRRC1PETITION 96 final.wpd Patti Honlgan Vice-President, College Commons Neighborhood Association ~ N. Delaware St. Indianapolis, IN 46240 July25, 1999 Mr. David Cremeans, President Carmel-Clay Plan Commision One Civic Square Carmel, Indiana 46032 Dear Mr. Cremeans: This Letter is by way of clarification. At the end of the Carmel Planning Commission meeting on June 15t~, attorney Philip Nicely misspoke. He stated that the neighbors had no objection to the P.R. Duke proposed development at 96t~ and Meridian Streets, which was under discussion at this meeting. He was, in fact, referring to the May 18th Planning commission meeting at which Building #6 at Parkwood Crossing was under discussion. As Vice-President of the College Commons Neighborhood Association, I was asked to report that the neighbors had no objection to the construction of Building #6 but with a request for turning offthe lights in the existing buildings. The College Commons Neighborhood Association does object to the proposed 96th and Meridian development. Had it not been for the lateness of the hour, I would have made this correction at the June 15th meeting. Thank you for your attention to this detail. Sincerely, Path Horrigan William T. Rosenbaum 728 Braeside S. Drive Indianapolis, IN 46260 (317) 848-4952 July 14, 1999 Carmel Plan Commission 1 Civic Square Carmel, Indiana 46032 Re: Proposed development f or ~h~St re'et ~n~dd US 31 Dear Commissioners: I am very concerned about the plans for extensive development at the intersection of 96th Street and US 31. I live near 91st Street and Spring Mill Road. There is already so much traffic on both 91st Street and on 96th Street that it is very difficult to get to or from our neighborhood in the mornings and at night. This planned development will greatly increase this problem. I would request your opposition to this proposal. Very truly yours, William T. Rosenbaum John H. Grogan, President Cedar Knolls Homeowner's Association 9595 Copley Drive Indianapolis, IN 46260 July 8,1999 Mr. David A. Cremeans, President Carmel-Clay Plan Commission One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 Dear Mr. Cremeans: Re: Duke rezoning 96* & Meridian Streets. On June 2, 1999 we delivered a letter for the Plan Commission's Special Study committee to the Community Development office with a copy to Mr. Philip Nicely, Duke's attorney. We were informed that copies of this letter, which raised neighborhood concerns on the density, screening and construction and other developer commitments, would be dism'buted to all Commission members. In addition, on June 11, 1999 Mr. Dan Sterner, a resident of our neighborhood, sent a letter (copy attached) to Mr. Nicely addressing the proposed developer's commitments and the issues covered in our June 2~ letter. During your Plan Commission's June 15, 1999 meeting the issues raised in these letters were not addressed and there was no acknowledgment that they had even been considered. The revised commitmems presented by Duke that evening only included a couple of minor revisions and did not address any of the substantive issues. Since the case was being postponed, and in due respect to the committee and the late hour, we did not further raise any of these unan.qwered issues. We do request that before any action is taken by the Plan Commission on this rezoning that the details of these con~q~itments be tightened and these requested changes included. The extreme density of the proposed development in the already busy intersections of 96t~, Meridian and I 465 is of major concern to residents of Hamilton and IVlarion Counties. The impact of the traffic entering and exiting through these intersections l~om the massive 4 stories parking garages, a hotel, restaurants and retail stores will be unmanageable. The City of Carmel apparently did not have jurisdiction or control on planning approval of the mess at 146t" and U.S. 31 but you do comrol the City's entrance ofthe future - what do you w~mt it to look like? John H. Crrogan DAN G.m Vi~ F~,esimile Philip A. Nicely, Esq. Bose McKirmey & Evans 8888 Keystone Crossing, Suite 1500 Indianapolis, IN 46240 Phil: John Cfl'ognn, President of Cedar Knolls Homeowners Association, has asked that, in his absence, I comment on the revised Commilraents Concerning Development and Use of Real Estate which you delivered to me at our meeting yesterday in your office. John will be relwning to Indianapolis on Monday and may well have further comments, as I am sure will others who are receiving copies of this letter. In addition to my statements of yesterday addressing those Commitments, a copy of which is forwarded herewith, with some of my comments noted thereon: 3.a. nad b. Change "office buildina" to "structure". No office building on the office tract should exceed 5 stories. This also goes to the density issue discussed below. ~ 3.d. The berm should be increased to 8' to 10'. 3.e. Leasing signs should be restricted to temporary leasing signs. 3 j. Tbete should be no access to Spdngmill Road. The condition of specific approval by the Commission is unacceptable. Among other things, this means it could be approved now. 3.0. Review and approval of conceptual site development plans and final site development plans should be subject to the approvals of Pine Drive Neighborhood Association, Belle Meade Neighborhood Association and Cedar Knolls Homeowners Association (collectively, the 'T,leighborhood Associations"). 4~X}BnkO~eToget. 111 Monument Orde · ladtoP, s~olls, Fadlana461OI.5140 l'elepho~e $t7/650.4000 · t~x Philip A. Nicely, Esq. June 11, 1999 Page 2 3.p. Sight lines should be unrestricted. "Aesthetically improved" is vague. Add "and consistent architecturally and in design with the oft'ice buildings adjacent thereto". 3.s. We continue to emphatically o~ect to the densi~ which the Developer proposes. 710,000 square feet of leasable office space will create an unlivable impact on the surrounding area. The density should be reduced to the same as that in Pa&wood East, i.e. 19,000 square feet per acre. If all this means that the Owner may need to reduce his profit in order for the project to be economically feasible for the Developer to go ahead, so be it. He. should not be allowed excess profit when it causes substantial loss of value and enjoyment to the surrounding real estate. Helicopters should be prohibited from landing anywhere on any real estate which is the subject of the proposed Commitments for the Southwest Qundrant, the Northwes~ Quadrant, and the Southeaat Quadrant. There should be a Commitment concerning construction activities such ns minimization of dust, noise and inconvenience to the surrounding neighborhood, keeping 96th Street, Springmill end surrounding streets clean and free of construction materials, dirt and parked equipment or vehicles, construction traffic should be restricted to entrances within the eastern 600 feet of the Southwest Quadrant, construction vehicles, equipmem, portable toilets and stored materials should be screened. Heavy traffic should be prohibited on Springmill and 96th Street, and the speed limit on 96th Street west of Meridian should be reduced to 35 miles an hour. The Commitments should not be modified or changed without the consent of the Neighborhood Associations. Dan O. Sterner DGS/raw Enclosure Philip A. Nicely, Esq. June 11, 1999 Page 3 Mr. Thomas M. Bartlett (wlen¢., via facsimile) Department of Metropolitan Development Division of Planning City of Indianapolis Mrs. Ruth Hayes (wlenc., via facsimile) Zeff A. Weiss, Esq. (wlenc., via facsimile) One American Square, Box 82001 Indianapolis, IN 46204 L. Roben Lowe, Ir., F..~q. (w/enc., via facsimile) Bank One Tower ! 11 Monument Circle, Suite 4600 Indianapolis, IN 46204 Mr. John H. Orogan (wlenc., via hand delivery) 9595 Copley Driv~ Indianapolis, IN 46260 Mr. Serry Wagner (w/enc., via hand delivery) 211 West 96th Street Indianapolis, IN 46260 John H. Grogan, President Cedar Knolls Homeowner's Association 9595 Copley Drive Indianapolis, IN 46260 July 8,1999 Mr. David A. Cremeans, President Carmel-Clay Plan Commission One Civic Square Carmel, 1N 46032 Dear Mr. Cremeans: Re: Duke rezoning 96th & Meridian Streets. On June 2, 1999 we delivered a letter for the Plan Commission's Special Study committee to the Cormnunity Development office with a copy to Mr. Philip Nicely, Duke's attorney. We were informed that copies of this letter, which raised neighborhood concerns on the density, screening and construction and other developer commitments, would be distributed to all Commission members. In addition, on June 11, 1999 Mr. Dan Sterner, a resident of our neighborhood, sent a letter (copy attached) to Mr. Nicely addressing the proposed developer's commitments and the issues covered in our June 2na letter. During your Plan Commission's June 15, 1999 meeting the issues raised in these letters were not addressed and there was no acknowledgment that they had even been considered. The revised commitments presented by Duke that evening only included a couple of minor revisions and did not address any of the substantive issues. Since the case was being postponed, and in due respect to the committee and the late hour, we did not further raise any of these unanswered issues. We do request that before any action is taken by the Plan Commission on this rezoning that the details of these commitments he tightened and these requested changes included. The extreme density of the proposed developmem in the already busy intersections of 96th, Meridian and I 465 is of major concern to residents of Hamilton and Marion Counties. The irrq~act of the traffic entering and exiting through these intersections from the massive 4 stories parking garages, a hotel, restaurants and retail stores will be unmanageable. The City of Carmel apparently did not have jurisdiction or control on planning approval of the mess at 146t~ and U.S. 31 but you do control the City's entrance ofthe future - what do you want it to look like? Sincerely, John H. Grogan Sune 11, 1999 Philip A. Nicely, Esq. Bose McKirmey 8: Evans 8888 Keystone Crossing, Suite 1500 Indianapolis, IN 46240 Dear Phil: John C-rogen, President of Cedar Knolls Homeowners Association, has asked that, in his absence, I comment on the revised Commitments Concerning Development and Use of Real Estate which you delivered to me at our meeting yesterday in your office. John will be returning ~o Indianapolis on Monday and may well have further comments, as I am sure will others who are receiving oopies of this letter. In addition to my statements of yesterday addressin~ those Commitments, a copy of which is forwarded herewith, with some of my comments noted thereon: 3.a. and b. Change "o~cc buildinj" to "s~..ctu~". No office building on the office tract should exceed 5 stories. This also gb~-s to the density issue discussed below. 3.d. The berm should be increased to 8' to 10'. 3.e. Leasing signs should be restricted to temporary leasing signs. 3.j. There should be no access to Springmill Road. The condition of specific approval by the Commission is unacceptable. Among other things, this means it could be approved now. 3.0. Review and approval of conceptual site development plans and final site development plans should be subject to the approvals of Pine Drive Neighborhood Association, Belle Meade Neighborhood Association and Cedar Knolls Homeowners Association (collectively, the '~leighborhood Associations"). 4000 Bank O~e ?owr · 111 Mo~um~ O~de. lndf~ui~s, Ifldf~fu 46204-SJ40 Tdepbo~e ~17,~50-4000 · L~L~ 317/13~-~01 Philip A. Nical~, June 11, 1999 3.p. Sight lines should be unrestricted. "Aesthetically improved" is vague. Add "and consistent architecturally and in design with the off'ice buildings adjacent thereto". 3.S. We continue tO em_nhatically o~ect to the densi~ w~ch the Developer proposes. 710,000 square feet of leasable office space will create an unlivable impact on the surrounding area. The density should be reduced to the same as ihat in Pa~kwood East, i.e. 19,000 square feet per acre, If all ~his m~ans that the Ova~er may need to reduce Ms profit in order for ~he project to be economically feasible for the Developer to go ahead, so be it. He. should not be allowed execs profit when it causes substantial loss of value and enjoyment to thc surrounding real estate. Helicopters should be prohibited from landing anywhere on any real estate which is the subject of the proposed Commitments for the Southwes~ Quadrant, the Northwesi Quadrant, and thc Southeast Quadrant. There should be a Commitment concerning construction aclivities such as minimization of dust, noise and inconvenience to the surrounding neighborhood, keeping 96~h Street, Springmill md surrounding s~e~s clean and free of construction materials, din and parke~ equipment or vehicles, construction traffic should be restricted to entrances wi~in the eastern 600 feet of the Southwest Quadrant, conslruction vehicles, equlpmenl, portable toile~s and stored materials should be screened. Heavy traffic should be prohibited on Springmill and 9$th Street, and the speed limit on 96th Street west of Meridian should be reduced to 35 miles an hour. The Commitments should not be modified or changed ~ithout the consent of the Neighborhood Associations. Dan O. Sterner DGS/raw Enclosure Philip A. Nicely, Esq. June 11, 1999 Page 3 CC: Mr. Thoma~ M. Bartlett (w/eric., via facsimile) Department of Metropolitan Development Division of Planning City of Indianapolis Mrs. Ruth Hayes (w/enc., via facsimile) Zeff A. Weiss, Esq. (w/eric., via facsimile) One American Square, Box 82001 Indianapolis, IN 46204 L. Robert Lowe, Jr., Esq. (w/eric., via facsimile) Bank One Tower ! 11 Monument Circle, Suite 4600 Indianapolis, IN 46204 Mr. John H. Orngan (w/eric., via hand delivery) 9595 Copley Ddve Indianapolis, IN 46260 Mr. Jerry Wa~ner (w/enc., via hand delivery) 211 West 96th Street Indianapolis, IN 46260 PETITION TO THE COMMISSIONERS OF HAMILTON COUNTY AND THE PLAN COMMISSION OF CARMEL, INDIANA The undersigned are owners of residential real estate in western Clay Township in Hamilton County, Indiana. As owners and taxpayers we respectfully submit this petition for the purpose of: Soliciting your support for preserving the rural residential character of The Community of West Clay (herein sometimes referred to as "West Clay"). Encouraging you to establish criteria for West Clay roadways that: (a) makes reasonable provision for future traff'~c needs and (b) minimizes the taking of private property for roadways and intersections. Opposing the proposed re-zoning and development project of Duke Realty and its associated investors located at and surrounding the intersections at US 31, 96th Street and Interstate 465. We oppose the Duke development because it will "gridlock" traffic in an area of two to three miles surrounding the intersection. We ask that each of your respective bodies, acting within the scope of their jurisdiction, vote to reject the re-zoning request, in its present form. If the project is approved in any form, it should be so designed that traffic generated therefrom not overwhelm the reasonable residential roadways proposed for West Clay. Moreover, the proposed Duke development will have a devastating effect upon our neighbors, commercial and residential, in the northern Marion County area immediately and remotely adjacent to the 96t~ and Meridian intersection site. We ask you to support and vote for: a. Preserving the beautiful residential and estate properties and discouraging commercial/industrial encroachment through zoning classifications and related public improvements in West Clay. b. Roadways and intersections in West Clay that minimize the taking of private property and yet serve the reasonable future traffic needs of the area. We believe that: 1. The above objectives can be achieved by utilizing arterial rights of way that are no greater than 90 feet in width. We oppose rights of way that are greater than 90 feet in width. Such sprawling vistas discourage residential retention and encourage commercial/industrial development. They are diametrically opposed to the preservation-of-land objective as set forth in the comprehensive plan for residential Western Clay Township. 2. A 90 foot arterial right of way provides space for four - 12 foot traffic lanes, a 16 foot median/left turn lane (5 lanes in all), curbs, 50 foot radius turns with tapers (WB-15 semi), 3 foot buffer strips, 6 foot Multi-Use Paths, 2 feet for other utilities services and enclosed surface water drainage. The Level of Service ("LOS") of this configuration is LOS "C" or better selu Jno,~ Jo~. ,~doo e ule:laJ aseald iglNVN · pa ,!O!lOS seuJee s! uop,!ied s!4 , jo Joddns JnoA 'SUO!IOGSJG)U! leeJ)S ~9~ ~ pue peo~J eu~ol pue laeJ1S ~,9[ I. pue II!UJ§upds eql le t[tJelno)lJed pue '~elO 1SaM u) suo!loesJ~)lU! eqi JOj pJepuels aql se peldope eq U!SJeLI q:lJOJ )es I~.lJ~)lpo eLI] leql )lse eM *)UaLUe^oJdLU! JOJ peloe[o~d suo!ioesJe)u! eJouJ JO ual eq) Je^o IN£$ o) IN~$ jo s6u!^es V 'uo!loesJelu! Jed 000'00C$ o) 000'00~$ jo s6uI^es V 'slsoo uo!lomisuoo u! %cj~ o} %0~ pue 6upte) puel u! %0C se 4onuJ se eAes ueo epeip3 u6!sep elqeuoseeJ jo uo!idoPV ',,peu6!seo Je^o,, eJe/[e41 '4oee 00'000'000'C$ ol O0'O00'O00'E$ uJoJj eJeLp, v[ue isoo 'pesodoJd se 'suop, oesJelUl '9 *esn puel o) p@ielaJ se eeJe ,~elO u~eiSeM eq) Joj su6isep 6u!uoz pue 15u!uueld e^!sueqeJdmo3 peqs!lqe)se eq1 q1!~ lua3s!suoo s! isanbeJ Jn0 *S ',~l!^!lOe leplsnpu! pue sseu!snq 'le!OJeUJLUOO se§eJnoosip pue eeJe eql jo ~lneeq pue ~el~J~q~ le!luep!seJ el~osdn alii 15u!AJeseJd u!/qlueou!uB!s lSisse II!M e!JelpO u§!sep/~e~peoJ 'pel~Jepotu le,~ 'el~nbep~ pesodoJd mO 'peJepisuo3 eq plnoqs ioejja Jel!cU!s jo seo!Aap JeqIo pue §u!deospuel le!oeds 'su§!sep uo!ioasJalU! eAIloeJlle 'sJe)peLu ~eM ~JlUe eA!leJooep JO esn snopipnl' 'SeA?,Oe[qo elqeJiSep eJe seeJe leiiuep!seJ leJnJ s,/[elO lSeM lOeloJd pue eleeUilep leLlI ~elO lSeM ~o ~[IIUnLUU-IO0 aLII 01U! S~eM ~JlU:I '1~ '/~elO ISOM u! peieu!uJ)le oq plnoqs $/~eM~Jecl '~I~M JO $1LI§p JOOJ OJ- JOJ epiAoJd plnoqs S,(eMpeOJ JOlOellOO 'eeJe eql Jo 'lie lou J) 'ISOLU U) 0~0~ JeE)/~ eqt q§noJql PETITION TO THE COMMISSIONERS OF HAMILTON COUNTY AND THE PLAN COMMISSION OF CARMEL, INDIANA The undersigned are owners of residential real estate in westem Clay Township in Hamilton County, Indiana. As owners and taxpayers we respectfully submit this petition for the purpose of: Soliciting your support for preserving the rural residential character of The Community of West Clay (herein sometimes referred to as "West Clay"). Encouraging you to establish criteria for West Clay roadways that: la) makes reasonable provision for future traffic needs and lb) minimizes the taking of private property for roadways and intersections. Opposing the proposed re-zoning and development project of Duke Realty and its associated investors located at and surrounding the intersections at US 31, 96th Street and Interstate 465. We oppose the Duke development because it will "gridlock" traffic in an area of two to three miles surrounding the intersection. We ask that each of your respective bodies, acting within the scope of their jurisdiction, vote to reject the re-zoning request, in its present form. If the project is approved in any form, it should be so designed that traffic generated therefrom not overwhelm the reasonable residential roadways proposed for West Clay. Moreover, the proposed Duke development will have a devastating effect upon our neighbors, commercial and residential, in the northern Marion County area immediately and remotely adjacent to the 96~ and Meddian intersection site. We ask you to support and vote for: a. Preserving the beautiful residential and estate properties and discouraging commercial/industrial encroachment through zoning classifications and related public improvements in West Clay. b. Roadways and intersections in West Clay that minimize the taking of private property and yet serve the reasonable future traffic needs of the area. We believe that: 1. The above objectives can be achieved by utilizing arterial rights of way that are no greater than 90 feet in width. We oppose rights of way that are greater than 90 feet in width. Such sprawling vistas discourage residential retention and encourage commercial/industrial development. They are diametrically opposed to the preservation-of-land objective as set forth in the comprehensive plan for residential Western Clay Township. 2. A 90 foot arterial right of way provides space for four - 12 foot traffic lanes, a 16 foot median/left turn lane (5 lanes in all), curbs, 50 foot radius turns with tapers (WB-15 semi), 3 foot buffer strips, 6 foot Multi-Use Paths, 2 feet for other utilities services and enclosed surface water drainage. The Level of Service ("LOS") of this configuration is LOS "C" or better · pe ,!O!lOS/[p, seuJee s! uop, p, ed s!q , 1Joddns JnoA 'suo!loeSJelU! leeJ1S ~9[ ~ pue peo~l euMo. L pue leeJlS ~9[ ~ pue Ii!UJl~u!JdS eql le/[IJelno!lJed pue '~elO lSeAA u! suo!loeSJelU! eql Joj pJepueis eql se peldope eq uj@Jeq qlJOJ }es e!Jelpo eq3 leql ~lse eM 'lUeLUe^oJdLU! JOJ peloeroJd suo!loeSJelU[ GJOLU JO u@l eql Je^o INS$ o~, IN1~$ jo S~U!AeS ¥ 'UO!IO~)SJGlU! Jed 000'00~$ ol 000'00~$ Jo s~u!^eS ¥ 's3so3 uo!lgnJlSUOO u! %g~ Ol %0~ pue buptel puel u! %0~ se 4onw se e^es ueo e.uel!Jo ub!sep elqeuoseeJ jo uo!idop¥ ',,peu§!seo JaAO, 8Je ~)4.L '4Ol~e 00'000'000'E:$ O1 00'000'000'~$ WOJJ eJaq~v~ue 1soo 'pesodoJd se 'suo?,oes~elal '9 'esn puel Ol peleleJ se eeJe Xelo uJelse~ eql Jot su§!sep 5u!uoz pue 5u!uueld e^!sueqeJduJoo peqs!lqeise eql ql!J lue~,s!suo3 s! lsenbeJ Jn0 '~; '~!^!loe le!Jlsnpu! pue sseu!snq 'le!OJewwoo se§eJnoos!p pue eeJe aql jo Xlneaq pue JeloeJeq::) le.lluep!seJ eleosdn eq), 15upJeseJd u! XllUeO!j!u§.s lstsse 11!/4 e!JelpO u§!sap ~eMpeOJ 'pe),~Jepo,,, 1e,{ 'e~,enbepe pesodoJd JnO '~ 'XelO lSeM u! peleu!cu!le eq plnoqs s/~eM)~Jed '/(eM JO $:lqJ~!J OZ JOJ ep!AOJd plnoqs $/[eMpeoJ JO:iOgljo0 'eeJe el.il jo 'lie lou J! 'lsouJ u! OEO~ Jeg/( 9ClJ LI~nOJLJI PETITION TO THE COMMISSIONERS OF HAMILTON COUNTY AND THE PLAN COMMISSION OF CARMEL, INDIANA The undersigned are owners of residential real estate in western Clay Township in Hamilton County, Indiana. As owners and taxpayers we respectfully submit this petition for the purpose of: Soliciting your support for preserving the rural residential character of The Community of West Clay (herein sometimes referred to as "West Clay"). Encouraging you to establish criteria for West Clay roadways that: (a) makes reasonable provision for future traffic needs and (b) minimizes the taking of private property for roadways and intersections. Opposing the proposed re-zoning and development project of Duke Realty and its associated investors located at and surrounding the intersections at US 31, 96th Street and Interstate 465. We oppose the Duke development because it will "gridlock" traffic in an area of two to three miles surrounding the intersection. We ask that each of your respective bodies, acting within the scope of their jurisdiction, vote to reject the re-zoning request, in its present form. If the project is approved in any form, it should be so designed that traffic generated therefrom not overwhelm the reasonable residential roadways proposed for West Clay. Moreover, the proposed Duke development will have a devastating effect upon our neighbors, commercial and residential, in the northern Marion County area immediately and remotely adjacent to the 96t' and Meridian intersection site. We ask you to support and vote for: a. Preserving the beautiful residential and estate properties and discouraging commercial/industrial encroachment through zoning classifications and related public improvements in West Clay. b. Roadways and intersections in West Clay that minimize the taking of private property and yet serve the reasonable future traffic needs of the area. We believe that: 1. The above objectives can be achieved by utilizing arterial rights of way that are no greater than 90 feet in width, We oppose rights of way that are greater than 90 feet in width. Such sprawling vistas discourage residential retention and encourage commercial/industrial development. They are diametrically opposed to the preservation-of-land objective as set forth in the comprehensive plan for residential Western Clay Township. 2. A 90 foot arterial right of way provides space for four - 12 foot traffic lanes, a 16 foot median/left turn lane (5 lanes in all), curbs, 50 foot radius turns with tapers (WB-15 semi), 3 foot buffer strips, 6 foot Multi-Use Paths, 2 feet for other utilities services and enclosed surface water drainage. The Level of Service ("LOS") of this configuration is LOS "C" or better selu Jno~ Joj ~doo e u!elaJ eseeld 31N~N · pel!OUos , llSauJea s! uo!lged s!qi jo 1Joddns Jno , 'suo!ioeSJelU! 19GJIS ~9L L pue peo~ eUMOi pue leeJ1S ~9L ~ pue II!UJ6upd$ eql le XIJelno!ped pue 'XelO 1SaM u! suo!loeSJalU! aql JOJ pJepUelS 9q1 se paldope eq u!eJeq qlJOJ les e!J9llJ::) eH1 leU1 ~lSe aM '1U~IJJGAoJdLU! JOJ pal::)eroJd suo!lgesJ@jU! @JOLJJ JO ua] al. J1 JaAO J~JJ~$ OJ J~J~$ JO s6ul^es ¥ 'uo]loasJalU! Jad 000'00C5 Ol 000'00~$ Jo s§u!^eS ¥ 's]soo uo!]onJlsuoo u! %g~. Ol %0L pue 6Uplel puel u! %0C se qonuJ se e^es u~ e!Jal!Jo ut~!sap alqeuosem jo uo!ldop¥ ',,peu§!saO Ja^O,, aJe `(aqj. 'qoea 00'000'000'~:$ Ol 00'000'000'~$ uJoJj ajaqM,(Ue 1soo 'pasodo~d se 'suo!loesJelul '9 'asn puel ol palelaJ se eaJe ~elO UJeJSaM eql JOJ su~!sep 6u!uoz pue 5uluueld e^!suaqeJdtuoo peqsuqelse atll tll!M luais!suoo s! lsanbaJ Jn0 'g '~1!^!13e leplsnpu! pue ssau!snq 'Ie!OJaLUWO0 sa§eJnoos!p pue eeJe eql jo `(lneaq pue JaJoeJ2LI3 le!luep!seJ el~osdn eq), §u!~JaseJd u! `(llUeOg!u6!s lS!SSe II!M e!Jelpo u§!sep `(eMpeoJ 'peieJepotu le/~ 'elenbepe pesodoJd Jn0 't 'paJap!suoo aq plnoqs loaJJa JeI!LLI!S Jo sao!^ap Jaqlo pue 6u!deospuel le!oads 'su§!sep uo!loasJalu! aA!lOeJlle 'sJaqJeLU XeM/dlUa aA!leJooap Jo asn snop!pn[' 'SaA! afqo elqeJ!sep aJe seaJe le!luep!seJ leJnJ s,~elO ISaM loaloJd pue aleau!lap ]eql `(elO ]SaM jo ~]!unCUtuoo aql o~u! sXe~ ~J]U~ 't; ',(elC) ]SaM u! paleU!UJ!la eq plnoqs s~eM~JecJ ',(eM JO Slq6!J lOOJ 0Z JOJ ap)AOJd plnoqs s,~eMpeoJ JoloelloC) 'eede eql jo 'lie lOU J! ']souJ u! 0~0g Jea,( aql q6noJql PETITION TO THE COMMISSIONERS OF HAMILTON COUNTY AND THE PLAN COMMISSION OF CARMEL, INDIANA The undersigned are owners of residential real estate in western Clay Township in Hamilton County, Indiana. As owners and taxpayers we respectfully submit this petition for the purpose of: Soliciting your support for preserving the rural residential character of The Community of West Clay (herein sometimes referred to as "West Clay"). Encouraging you to establish criteria for West Clay roadways that: (a) makes reasonable provision for future traffic needs and (b) minimizes the taking of private property for roadways and intersections. Opposing the proposed re-zoning and development project of Duke Realty and its associated investors located at and surrounding the intersections at US 31, 96th Street and Interstate 465. We oppose the Duke development because it will kgridlock" traffic in an area of two to three miles surrounding the intersection. We ask that each of your respective bodies, acting within the scope of their jurisdiction, vote to reject the re-zoning request, in its present form. If the project is approved in any form, it should be so designed that traffic generated therefrom not overwhelm the reasonable residential roadways proposed for West Clay. Moreover, the proposed Duke development will have a devastating effect upon our neighbors, commercial and residential, in the northern Marion County area immediately and remotely adjacent to the 96~' and Meridian intersection site. We ask you to support and vote for: a. Presen/ing the beautiful residential and estate properties and discouraging .commercial/industrial encroachment through zoning classifications and related public ~mprovements in West Clay. b. Roadways and intersections in West Clay that minimize the taking of private property and yet serve the reasonable future traffic needs of the area. We believe that: 1. The above objectives can be achieved by utilizing arterial rights of way that are no greater than 90 feet in width. We oppose rights of way that are greater than 90 feet in width. Such sprawling vistas discourage residential retention and encourage commercial/industrial development. They are diametrically opposed to the preservation-of-land objective as set forth in the comprehensive plan for residential Western Clay Township. 2. A 90 foot arterial right of way provides space for four - 12 foot traffic lanes, a 16 foot median/left turn lane (5 lanes in all), curbs, 50 foot radius tums with tapers (WB-15 semi), 3 foot buffer strips, 6 foot Multi-Use Paths, 2 feet for ether utilities services and enclosed surface water drainage. The Level of Service ('LOS") of this configuration is LOS "C" or better · pei!O!lOS ~;p, seuJee s! uo!lp, ed s!q~, jo l~oddns JnoA · suo!loesJelU! IeaJ1S ~9t L pue peo~l eu~oJ, pue leeJIS ~9t t pue II!tUSuUds eql le ~Pelno!ped pue ',{elO 1seaA, u! suo!loas~elu! eql Joj pdepuels eLI1 se peldope eq u!eJeq ql~oJ les e.uel.uo eql leql ~lse aA& · lUatUe^oddtu! ~oj peloe[oJd suo!ioes~elu! e~OLU JO ue3 eql ~e^o ~1~:$ o1 I~$ Jo sSu!^es y 'uo!loas~elu! dad 000'00S$ ol 000'00~:$ Jo s§u~es ¥ 'slsoo uo!lorulsuoo u! %g~ o~, %01. pue §ul~lel puel u! %0~: se qonuJ se e^es ueo e!del.uo ul~!sap elqeuosee~ ~o UO!ldOp¥ ',,peuEi!saQ ~aAO,, ede ~eq.L 'qoea 00'000'000"S$ ol 00'000'000'~:$ udo~j eJeq,w~ue 1soo 'pesododd se 'suo!loes~elUl '9 · esn pueI ol peleleJ se eeJe ~elO tuelseM eq), Joj su6!sep 5u!uoz pue 5u!uueld eNsueqeJdtuoo peqs!lqelsa eq~, qll~ 1uels!suoo s! lsenbeJ JnO -g · /q~!loe le.ulsnpu! pue sseu!snq 'Ie.DJeLULUOO seS..e~noos!p pue eeJl~ eql ~o/~lneeq pue aeloe~eqo le!]uep!se~ eleosdn eq~, 5upuase~d u! ls!sse I17~ e.uel.uo u§!sep ,(e/~peoa 'pele~epotu la,{ 'elenbepe pesodoJd Jno 'padep{suo3 eq plnoqs loe~Je JI~I{LUIS JO seo{^ep Jaqlo pue I~u{deospuel le{oeds 'su§lsap uo{3oes~elu{ a^!lOeJlle 's~e~uetu ~e~ ~Jlue e^geJooep jo esn snop!pnr 'se^!loa.rqo elqeJ!sep eJe seeJe le!luep!seJ leJm s/{elO ISeN~ 1oelo~d pue eleeU!leP leql ,{elO lSaAA ~to ~l!untutuoo eq.L OlU! s~e~/UlU:l 'S '~elO lse/v~ u! peleu!Lu!la eq plnoqs s~e/~Jed '~e,,A jo SlLl§p 0Z Joj ep!^o~d plnoqs s,{e/~peoJ ~oloellOO 'eeJe eql jo 'lie lou J! 'lSOLU U! 0g0~ Jee,{ ~ql qSnO~Lll PETITION TO THE COMMISSIONERS OF HAMILTON COUNTY AND THE PLAN COMMISSION OF CARMEL, INDIANA The undersigned am owners of residential mai estate in westem Clay Township in Hamilton County, Indiana. As owners and taxpayers we respectfully submit this petition for the purpose of: Soliciting your support for preserving the rural residential character of The Community of West Clay (herein sometimes referred to as ~West Clay"). Encouraging you to establish criteria for West Clay roadways that: (a) makes reasonable provision for future traffic needs and (b) minimizes the taking of private property for roadways and intersections. Opposing the proposed re-zoning and development project of Duke Realty and its associated investors located at and surrounding the intersections at US 31, 96th Street and Interstate 465. We oppose the Duke development because it will 'gddlock" traffic in an area of two to three miles surrounding the intersection. We ask that each of your respective bodies, acting within the scope of their jurisdiction, vote to reject the re-zoning request, in its present form. If the project is approved in any form, it should be so designed that traffic generated therefrom not overwhelm the reasonable residential roadways proposed for West Clay. Moreover, the proposed Duke development will have a devastating effect upon our neighbors, commercial and residential, in the northern Marion County area immediately and remotely adjacent to the 96~ and Meridian intersection site. We ask you to support and vote for: a. Preserving the beautiful residential and estate properties and discouraging .commercial/industrial encroachment through zoning classifications and related public Improvements in West Clay. b. Roadways and intersections in West Clay that minimize the taking of private property and yet serve the reasonable future traffic needs of the area. We believe that: 1. The above objectives can be achieved by utilizing arterial rights of way that are no greater than 90 feet in width. We oppose rights of way that ara greater than 90 feet in width. Such sprawling vistas discourage residential retention and encourage commercial/industrial development. They are diametrically opposed to the preservation-of-land objective as set forth in the comprehensive plan for residential Western Clay Township. 2. A 90 foot arterial right of way provides space for four - 12 foot traffic lanes, a 16 foot median/left tum lane (5 lanes in all), curbs, 50 foot radius tums with tapers (WB-15 semi), 3 foot buffer strips, 6 foot Multi-Use Paths, 2 feet for other utilities services and enclosed surface water drainage. The Level of Service ('LOS") of Ihis configuration is LOS "C" or better · Pa}lO!lOS ~[llSeuJee s! uo!l!ied s!ql jo 1Joddns JnoA · suojloeSJelU! leeJlS ~9~ ~ pue peo1:! eu~oJ, pue leeJ1S ~9[ [ pue II!LU§u.uds eql le ~pelnO~ed pue '~elO lseN~ u! suojloeSdelu! etll JOJ pJepuels eql se peldope eq u!eJeq Lrpoj les e.uel!JO eql leql 31se eAA 'luetue^oJduJ! Joj peloe.~oJd suo!ioes~elu! eJotu Jo uel eql Je^o IN{;$ o} IN:$ jo sSu!,es V 'uo!ioesdeiu! jed 000'00S$ o! O00'OOE$ jo s§u!^es ¥ 'slsoo uo!iorulsuoo u! %gt. Ol %OL pue §uplel puel u! %0S se qonuJ se e^es ueo e.uel{~ uS!sap elqeuoseeJ jo uo!ldopv ',,peuS!sea Ja^O,, e,e ,(aqJ. 'qoee 00'000'000'S$ ol 00'000'000'E$ tuoJ~ eJeqAv[ue 1soo 'pesodoJd se 'suo!}oesJalUl '9 · aSh puel ol peleleJ se eeJe ~elO tuelse/R eq} JoJ su§!sep 5u!uoz pue 5u!uueld e^!sueqeJdtuoo peqs!lqelse eq~, q{i/R luels!suoo s! lsenbed Jno 'g · Al{^{loe leplsnpu! pue sseu!snq 'lepJetuuJoo seS:eJnoos{p pue eeJe eql jo ,qneeq pue JeloeJeqo lep, uap!seJ eleosdn eq~, 5upueseJd u! ,{llueou.ulS!s is!sse II!/R epelpO u§!sep ,(e~peoJ 'pe~,eJepotu ia,{ 'elenbepe pesodoJd Jno '~ -paJep{suoo eq Plnoqs loeJJe JelltU!S jo seo{^ep Je~o pue §uideospuel lepeds 'su§lsep uo{loesJeiu! e^lloe~lle 'sJa~uetu Xe~A/UlUe e^!leJooep jo esn snop!pnl' 'se^!loerqo elqeJ!sep eJe seeJe le!luep!seJ leJnJ s/{elO lSe/V~ lOeloJd pue eleeu!lep leql XelO lsa/v~ jo XliuntuLuoo eq.L olu! s~[eA~/UlUg 'S 'XelO lSeAA u{ peleu{LuHe eq Plnoqs sXe~Ped ',~e~ jo slq§{J looj OL JOj ep!^oJd Plnous sXe~peoJ Joloello::) 'eaJe eLI1 JO 'lie lou J! 'lsotu u! OgO~ JeaX eql q§noJLI1 PETITION TO THE COMMISSIONERS OF HAMILTON COUNTY AND THE PLAN COMMISSION OF CARMEL, INDIANA The undersigned are owners of residential real estate in western Clay Township in Hamilton County, Indiana. As owners and taxpayers we respectfully submit this petition for the purpose of: Soliciting your support for preserving the rural residential character of The Community of West Clay (herein sometimes referred to as "West Clay'). Encouraging you to establish cdteda for West Clay roadways that: (a) makes reasonable provision for future traffic needs and (b) minimizes the taking of private property for roadways and intersections. Opposing the proposed re-zoning and development project of Duke Realty and its associated investors located at and surrounding the intersections at US 31, 96th Street and Interstate 465. We oppose the Duke development because it will 'gridlock' traffic in an area of two to three miles surrounding the intersection. We ask that each of your respective bodies, acting within the scope of their jurisdiction, vote to reject the re-zoning request, in its present form. If the project is approved in any form, it should be so designed that traffic generated therefrom not overwhelm the reasonable residential roadways proposed for West Clay. Moreover, the proposed Duke development will have a devastating effect upon our neighbors, commercial and residential, in the northern Marion County area immediately and remotely adjacent to the 96~ and Meridian intersection site. We ask you to support and vote for: a. Preserving the beautiful residential and estate properties and discouraging .commercial/industrial encroachment through zoning classifications and related public Improvements in West Clay. b. Roadways and intersections in West Clay that minimize the taking of private property and yet serve the reasonable future traffic needs of the area. We believe that: 1. The above objectives can be achieved by utilizing arterial rights of way that are no greater than 90 feet in width, We oppose rights of way that are greater than 90 feet in width. Such sprawling vistas discourage residential retention and encourage commercial/industrial development. They are diametrically opposed to the preservation-of-land objective as set forth in the comprehensive plan for residential Western Clay Township, 2. A 90 foot arterial right of way provides space for four - 12 foot traffic lanes, a 16 foot median/left turn lane (5 lanes in all), curbs, 50 foot radius tums with tapers (WB-15 semi), 3 foot buffer strips, 6 foot Multi-Use Paths, 2 feet for other utilities services and enclosed surface water drainage. The Level of Service ('LOS") of this configuration is LOS 'C" or better salU Jno,{ Jo~ ~doo e ule~,a~ aseeld 3flYN 'pe1!ouos ~llSeuJee s! uop, p, ad s!ql ~o ldoddns Jno~L 'suo!loes~elu! 1oe~IS ~91. ~ pue peo~J eu/~,oJ, pue leaJ1S ~9~ I. pue ii!tu§upds eql le ,(pelnolped pue ',(el::) lsaAA u! suo!loesdelu! eq} JoJ pJepuels eql se peldope eq u!eJaq LrlJOJ les e.ueLuo atp, leql ase eAA · luetuo^oJdtu! doj peloa.[oJd suo!loaS~elU! e~OLU JO Ual eql ~a^o 161~:$ o), I~1~$ jo sBu!~es ¥ 'uo!loes~elu! Jed 000'00C$ ol 000'00~$ Jo sSu.~es V 'sis(x) uollom~suoo u! %g~ o1%0~ pue 5uplel puel u! %0~ se qontu se e^es ueo epel.uo u6!sap elqeuosee~ jo uo!ldop¥ ',,peu6!sacI ~aAO, e J8 ~eq~ 'qoea 00'000'000'$$ ol 00'000'000'~$ uJoJi eJeq~ue 1soo 'pesodo~d se 'suo!3oesde}uI '9 · esn puel ol pe),elm se eeJe ,~elO tuelseA~ aU1 Joj suS!sep 5uluoz pue 5u!uueld eAlsuetleJdtuoo peqs!lqe~,sa aU1 q~!~ ~,uels!suoo s! ~,sanbaJ JnO 'g '/q~!Pe leplsnpu! pue ssau!snq 'lepdatuwoo sefieJnoos.p pue eede aql jo ,(lneeq pue .leloeJel4::) le!1uep!seJ eleosdn aq~, 6upuesaJd u. ,(llUeOg!u§!s ls!sse I1!~ epel.~ u§!sep ,{e/~peoJ 'paleJepotu ~,e,~ 'elenbepe pesodoJd Jno 'p 'pedep!suoo eq Plnoqs 1oa~je JeUm!s jo sao!^ep Jeqlo pue 5u!deospuel lepads 'su§!sep UO!lOe,~elu! e^!loeJlle 'sJe~uetu ,(e~/blue e^!leJooep jo esn snop!Pnr 'se^!loa.fqo elqeJ!sep eJe seeJe le!luep!se~ leJm s,XelO 1SOAA loelo~d pue oleeu!laP leql ~elO lsoAA jo ~l!unwwoo eq~ o}u! s~e~/01u3 'S '~elO lsoAA u! peleu!uJ!le eq plnoqs s,(em~ed '~e~ jo slq§p looJ 0/_ Joj ep!^odd plnoqs s/;et~peoJ JolOellOO 'eeJe eql jo 'lie lou J! 'lsotu u! OgOg Jeo~ eql qSnoJql PETITION TO THE COMMISSIONERS OF HAMILTON COUNTY AND THE PLAN COMMISSION OF CARMEL, INDIANA The undersigned are owners of residential real estate in western Clay Township in Hamilton County, Indiana. As owners and taxpayers we respectfully submit this petition for the purpose of: Soliciting your support for preserving the rural residential character of The Community of West Clay (herein sometimes referred to as uWest Clay"). Encouraging you to establish cdteda for West Clay roadways thai: (a) makes reasonable provision for future traffic needs and (b) minimizes the taking of private property for roadways and intersections. Opposing the proposed rs-zoning and development project of Duke Realty and its associated investors located at and surrounding the intersections at US 31, 96th Street and Interstate 465. We oppose the Duke development because it will 'gridlock" traffic in an arsa of two to three miles surrounding the intersection. We ask that each of your respective bodies, acting within the scope of their jurisdiction, vote to reject the re-zoning request, in its present form. If the project is approved in any form, it should be so designed that traffic generated therefrom not overwhelm the reasonable residential roadways proposed for West Clay. Moreover, the proposed Duke development will have a devastating effect upon our neighbors, commercial and residential, in the northern Marion County arsa immediate(y and remotely adjacent to the 96~' and Meridian intersection site. We ask you to support and vote for: a. Preserving the beautiful residential and estate properties and discouraging .commercial/industrial encroachment through zoning classifications and related public Improvements in West Clay. b. Roadways and intersections in West Clay that minimize the taking of private property and yet serve the reasonable future traffic needs of the arsa. We believe that: 1. The above objectives can be achieved by utilizing arterial rights of way that are no greater than 90 feet in width. We oppose rights of way that are greater than 90 feet in width. Such sprawiing vistas discourage residential retention and encourage commercial/industrial development. They ars diametrically opposed to the preservation-of-land objective as set forth in the comprehensive plan for residential Western Clay Township. 2. A 90 foot arterial right of way provides space for four - 12 foot traffic lanes, a 16 foot median/left turn lane (5 lanes in all), curbs, 50 foot radius tums with tapers (WB-15 semi), 3 foot buffer strips, 6 foot Multi-Use Paths, 2 feet for other utilities services and enclosed surface water drainage. The Level of Service ('LOS") of this configuration is LOS 'C" or better selu JnoX Joj ,(doo e ule~,eJ eseald ~IYN · pel!O!lOS , llSeu ee s! uo!lp, ed s!qi jo iJoddns Jno) 'suo!loesJelu! leeJ1S a9L ~ pue peo~ au~ol pue laeJ1S ~9[ I, pue iI?UJl~upds eql le APelno!ped pue 'Aelo 1SaM u? suo!loesJalu! aql JOj pJepuels eq} se paldope eq u!aJaq qlJOJ les e.u~l.u3 eql leql ~lse aAA 'luetue^oddLu! JOJ peloe.foJd suo!loesJelu! eJOtU Jo uel eLI} Je^O INS$ o} ~:$ Jo sSu!^es ¥ 'uo!loasJelU! Jed 000'00S$ o1 000'00~$ jo s§u.~es V 's~soo uo!}onJlsuoo u! %gl, o1%01, pue §upte~, puel u! %0£ se qonLu se e^es ue3 e!Jel.~ ulS!sap elqeuoseaJ Jo uogdoPV ',,pau§!saQ Ja^O,, eJe ,(eq~ 'qoee 00'000'000'~$ o~ O0'O00'O00'g$ uJoJj aJ~qM~ue 1soo 'p~sodoJd se 'suo!}oasJa}Ul '9 'esn puel ol PelelaJ se eeJe AelO uJelSeM eql Joj sul~!sep 6u!uoz pue i~uluueld eNsuaqeJdmoo peqsuqelse eq} q}!/~ luels!suoo ~ lsenbaJ Jno 'g · Al~!loe leplsnpu! pue sseu!snq 'le.DJeuxuoo sel~eJnoos!p pue eaJe aU1 JO Alneeq pue Je}oeJeqo le!}uep!seJ aleosdn aq~, ~u!~JesaJd u! AllUeOg!u§!s ~,s!sse I1~ epel.uo ul~!sep AeMpeoJ 'pe}eJepotu ~,e,{ 'm, enbepe pesodoJd Jno 'p 'pedep!suo3 eq Plnoqs loajJe Jel!~!$ jo sa~!^ep JaLIJO pue §u!deospuel le!oads 'suSlsep uo!ioesJalU! aA!IOeJRE 'sJmpetu XeM/uiue e^!leJooep jo esn snop!pnl' 'sa^!loa.l'qo elqeJ!sap aJe seaJe le.quep!seJ leJnJ s/(elO 1SaM ]loaioJd pue eleeu!leP ieql AelO 1SaM jo Xl!unuJuJOO eq.L olu! SAeM/LI:IU3 'S 'AelO iSaM u! paleu!tulla aq Plnoqs S,(eM~JEd 'AEM Jo slq6.u looJ OZ Jo] ep!^oJd Plnoqs sAeMpeoJ JolOellOO 'eaJe aql ~o 'lie iou J! 'lsotu u! 0~0~ JeaA ~ql q§noJqi PETITION TO THE COMMISSIONERS OF HAMILTON COUNTY AND THE PLAN COMMISSION OF CARMEL, INDIANA The undersigned ara owners of residential real estate in westem Clay Township in Hamilton County, Indiana. As owners and taxpayers we respectfully submit this petition for the purpose of: 1; e Soliciting your support for preserving the rural residential character of The Community of West Clay (herein sometimes referred to as "West Clay"). Encouraging you to establish criteria for West Clay roadways that: (a) makes reasonable provision for future traffic needs and (b) minimizes the taking of private property for roadways and intersections, Opposing the proposed re-zoning and development project of Duke Realty and its associated investors located at and surrounding the intersections at US 31, 96th Street and Interstate 465. We oppose the Duke development because it will "gridlock" traffic in an araa of two to three miles surrounding the intersection. We ask that each of your raspective bodies, acting within the scope of their jurisdiction, vote to reject the re-zoning request, in its present form. If the project is approved in any form, it should be so designed that traffic generated therefrom not overwhelm the reasonable residential roadways proposed for West Clay. Moreover, the proposed Duke development will have a devastating effect upon our neighbors, commercial and residential, in the northern Marion County area immediately and remotely adjacent to the 96~' and Meridian intersection site. We ask you to support and vote for: a. Preserving the beautiful residential and estate properties and discouraging .commercial/industrial encroachment through zoning classifications and ralated public tmprovements in West Clay. b. Roadways and intersections in West Clay that minimize the taking of private property and yet serve the reasonable future traffic needs of the area. We believe that: 1. The above objectives can be achieved by utilizing arterial rights of way that are no greater than 90 feet in width. We oppose rights of way that are greater than 90 feet in width. Such sprawling vistas discourage residential retention and encourage commercial/industrial development. They are diametrically opposed to the preservation-of-land objective as set forth in the comprehensive plan for residential Western Clay Township. 2. A 90 foot arterial right of way provides space for four - 12 foot traffic lanes, a 16 foot median/left turn lane (5 lanes in all), curbs, 50 foot radius tums with tapers (WB-15 semi), 3 foot buffer strips, 6 foot Multi-Use Paths, 2 feet for other utilities services and enclosed surface water drainage. The Level of Service ('LOS") of this configuration is LOS 'C" or better salU Jno,~ JOJ ,~doo e u!e}eJ esa:~ · pe)!O!lOS ~[p, seuJee s! uo!ip, ed s!ql J.O ~oddns Jno)~ 'suo!loesJelu! leeJ1S ~9~ ~ pue peo~J eu~oj, pue )eeJIS m91.1, pue IIFU§u.uds eq) le ,(pelrr~!lded pue ',(elO iseM. u! suo!loe~elu, eql Joj pJepuels aql se peldope eq u!eJeq qpoj les epe}.~ eql leql qse eM 'lueme^oJdtu! Joj pe)oe.~oJd suo!loes~elu! eJOLU Jo uel eql Je^o RISS o) INE$ jo SBUlAes V 'uo!loesJe)U! Jed 000'00S$ ol 000'00~$ jo s§u!^es V -slsoo uo!lorulsuoo u! %gL o1%01, pue §u!qei puel u! %0~ se qonuJ se e^es ueo epel.uo u6isep elqeuoseeJ jo uo!ldoPV -,,peu~!seo JeAO, aJ~ ,(GUI '143~a 00'000'000'C$ O1 00'000'000'ES LUOJJ eJeLIA~Ue 1soo 'pesodoJd se 'suo!}oesJe}Ul '9 · esn puel o} peleleJ se eede ,~eIO tue),se~ eq) JOJ suS!sep I~uluoz pue 6u!uueld eAlsuaqeJdtuoo paqs!lqe~se eqi q~,!~ }UelS!SUOO s! lsenbeJ Jno 'g '/q~!loe leu)snpu, pue sseu!snq 'lepdeLumc~ saDeJnoos.p pue eeJe aU) jo ,(lneeq pue JaloeJeqo le!luep!seJ eleosdn au) 15uuuese~d. urn. ,(I)t~eo U.~Ul~_ s }s!sse II!~ e!Jel.I~ u§!sep ,(e~pe~ 'pe~,eJepotu )e,~ 'elenbepe pesodoJd JnO -p 'peJep!suoo eq plnoqs loejje Jel!tU!s jo seo!^ep Jeqlo pue §u)deospuel lepeds 'suS)sep uo!loes~elu, e^.loeJ1)e 'sJe~JetU ,(e~/ulue e^!leJooep jo esn snop!pnr 'sa^.qoe.l'qo elqeJ!sep eJe seeJe le!luep!seJ leJnJ s/(elO ISaAA peloJd pue eleeu!leP leql ,(elO ),seNt jo ~)!untutuoo aq.L oiu! S,(eAA/UlUE) '~ ',(elO lSaN~ u! PaleU!LU)le eq PlnOqs s,~e~ed ',(e~ jo $1LI§)J OZ JOJ ep!^oJd PlnOqs s,(eMpeoJ JOpellOO -eeJe eql jo 'lie lOU j) 'lSOtU u! 0~0~ Jee~ eq) q§noJq) PETITION TO THE COMMISSIONERS OF HAMILTON COUNTY AND THE PLAN COMMISSION OF CARMEL, INDIANA The undersigned ars owners of residential real estate in western Clay Township in Hamilton County, Indiana. As owners and taxpayers we respectfully submit this petition for the purpose of: Soliciting your support for preserving the rural residential character of The Community of West Clay (herein sometimes referred to as "West Clay'). Encouraging you to establish criteda for West Clay roadways that: (a) makes reasonable provision for future traffic needs and (b) minimizes the taking of pdvate property for roadways and intersections. Opposing the proposed rs-zoning and development project of Duke Realty and its associated investors located at and surrounding the intersections at US 31, 96th Street and Interstate 465. We oppose the Duke development because it will 'gddlock" traffic in an arsa of two to three miles surrounding the intersection. We ask that each of your respective bodies, acting within the scope of their jurisdiction, vote to reject the re-zoning request, in its present form. If the project is approved in any form, it should be so designed that traffic generated therefrom not overwhelm the reasonable residential roadways proposed for West Clay. Moreover, the proposed Duke development will have a devastating effect upon our neighbors, commercial and residential, in the northern Marion County arsa immediately and remotely adjacent to the 96a and Meddian intersection site. We ask you to support and vote for: a. Preserving the beautiful residential and estate properties and discouraging .commercial/industrial encroachment through zoning classifications and related public Improvements in West Clay. b. Roadways and intersections in West Clay that minimize the taking of private property and yet serve the reasonable future traffic needs of the area. We believe that: 1. The above objectives can be achieved by utilizing arterial rights of way that are no greater than 90 feet in width. We oppose rights of way that ars greater than 90 feet in width. Such sprawling vistas discourage residential retention and encourage commercial/industrial development. They ars diametrically opposed to the preservation-of-land objective as set forth in the comprehensive plan for residential Western Clay Township. 2. A 90 foot arterial right of way provides space for four - 12 foot traffic lanes, a 16 foot median/left turn lane (5 lanes in all), curbs, 50 foot radius tums with tapers (WB-15 semi), 3 foot buffer strips, 6 foot Multi-Use Paths, 2 feet for other utilities services and enclosed surface water drainage. The Level of Service ("LOS') of this configuration is LOS 'C" or better SS~QQV selU Jno~[ Joj ,~doo e ule:laJ eSeeld 3~VN 'pel!O!lOS/[p, seuJee si uo!l!}ed s!q1 Jo lJoddns JnoA · suo!loesJelu! leeJ1s ~9[ [ pue peo~l euJoJ, pue leeJiS ~9[ ~ pue II!UJl~upds eql le ,~pelno.ped pue 'XelO lSeM u! suo!loesJelU! eql JOj pJepueis eLIl se peldope eq u!eJeq qpoj les epel.u3 eqt leql ~tse eM '}UeLUa^OJdLU! JOJ paloe[oJd suo!loesJeluJ eJotu JO uel eql JGAO JN~$ O:J JN~$ JO SSU!AeS V 'UO!lOeSJeiu! Jed 000'00g$ O1 000'00ES JO S§U~eS V 'slsoo uo!lorulsuoo u! %gl. ol %0~ pu~ §uplel PUel u! %0~ se LIOnUJ Se e^es ueo ePel.UO ul~lsep elq~uo$eeJ jo uo!ldopv ',,peul~!seQ JeAO,, eJe/[eq.L 'q:)i~e 00'000'000'~$ O1 00'000'000'ES UJOJJ eJeqM~Ue lsoo 'pesodoJd se 'suo!ioesJelUl '9 · esn puel o1 pe~,eleJ se eeJe ~elO LLle:ISeM eq} JOJ su§!sep I~u!uoz pue 5u!uueld e^lsuetleJdtuoo peqs!lqeise eql tll!~ 1uels!suoo s! :lsenbeJ JnO 'S '~l!^!loe leplsnpu! pue sseu!snq 'lepJetutuoo sel~eJnoos!p pue eeJe ell1 ~o ,~lneeq pue JejoeJetJo le!lueplseJ eleosdn etli I~u!AJeseJd u! ,~ll~eo§!u§!s ls!sse II.~M epel.uo u§!sep/~eMpeoJ 'peleJepotu levi 'elenbepe pesodcud Jno 't 'peJep!suoo eq Plnoqs loejje J~ljCUlS Jo seo!^ep Jeqlo pue §uJdeospuel lepads 'su6!sep uo!loesJelU! e^!ioeJile 'SJe~tJ~LU/[~M XJlUe e^!leJooep jo esn snop!pnf' 'se^!loe[qo elqeJ!sep eJ~ seem Ie~uep!seJ 18JnJ s,/[elC) )SaM lOeioJd pue eleeU!lep leql/~elO 1SaM jo ,(l!unuJuJOO eq/olu! S~eM/UlU=I '~ '/(elO lseM u! peleu!tu!la eq Plnoqs s/(eM~lJed '~eM JO slq6p looJ OZ JOJ ep!^oJd plnoqs s,~eMpeoJ JOlOallO0 *eaJe aq1 ~o 'lie lOU ~! 'lSOLU U! 0~0;~ Jee,( eql q§noJql PETITION TO THE COMMISSIONERS OF HAMILTON COUNTY AND THE PLAN COMMISSION OF CARMEL, INDIANA The undersigned are owners of residential real estate in western Clay Township in Hamilton County, Indiana. As owners and taxpayers we respectfully submit this petition for the purpose of: Soliciting your support for preserving the rural residential character of The Community of West Clay (herein sometimes referred to as "West Clay"). Encouraging you to establish criteda for West Clay roadways that: (a) makes reasonable provision for future traffic needs and (b) minimizes the taking of pdvate property for roadways and intersections. Opposing the proposed re-zoning and development project of Duke Realty and its associated investors located at and surrounding the intersections at US 31, 96th Street and Interstate 465. We oppose the Duke development because it will 'gddlock" traffic in an area of two to three miles surrounding the intersection. We ask that each of your respective bodies, acting within the scope of their jurisdiction, vote to reject the re-zoning request, in its present form. If the project is approved in any form, it should be so designed that traffic generated therefrom not overwhelm the reasonable residential roadways proposed for West Clay. Moreover, the proposed Duke development will have a devastating effect upon our neighbors, commercial and residential, in the northern Marion County area immediately and remotely adjacent to the 96"' and Meridian intersection site. We ask you to support and vote for: a. Preserving the beautiful residential and estate properties and discouraging commercial/industrial encroachment through zoning classifications and related public improvements in West Clay. b. Roadways and intersections in West Clay that minimize the taking of private property and yet serve the reasonable future traffic needs of the area. We believe that: 1. The above objectives can be achieved by utilizing arterial rights of way that are no greater than 90 feet in width. We oppose rights of way that are greater than 90 feet in width. Such sprawling vistas discourage residential retention and encourage commercial/industrial development. They are diametrically opposed to the preservation-of-land objective as set forth in the comprehensive plan for residential Western Clay Township. 2. A 90 foot arterial right of way provides space for four - 12 foot traffic lanes, a 16 foot median/left turn lane (5 lanes in all), curbs, 50 foot radius tums with tapers (WB-15 semi), 3 foot buffer strips, 6 foot Multi-Use Paths, 2 feet for other utilities services and enclosed surface water drainage. The Level of Service ("LOS") of this configuration is LOS "C" or better selU Jno,{ Joj ,~doo e u!e~,eJ eseeld SS~OO¥ 3~IYN · pei!o!!os ,{p, seuJee s! uop,!3ed s!ql ~o lJoddns Jno~ 'suo!pesJelu! ~9L L pue peol:l eu/~ol pue 1earls ~9[ L pue II!tUl~upds aU1 le ,{Pelnojped pue ',{elO lsaAA u! suoqoes~elu, eq~ JO~ pJepue~,s eql se peldope aq u!eJeq qpo~ les epel.uo eql leql ~lse · luetue^oJdLU! doj paloe.[o~d suo!loesJe~,u! adotu Jo ua), eql JeAO IN~:$ o3 ~$ Jo sSu!^es V 'uo!loesJelu! Jed 000'00£$ ol 000'00~$ Jo sSu~es V 'sisoo uo!}omlsuoo u! %gl, ol %OL pue 6uple} puel u! %0~ se Lpntu se a^es ueo eUel.uo u§!sap elqeuoseeJ jo uo!ldop¥ ',,peuS!seo ia^O,, aJe ~eq.L 'qoea 00'000'000'S$ ol 00'000'000'g$ tuoJ~ adaq~v~ue 1soo 'pesododd se 'suo!loesJm, Ul '9 · esn puel oi Pelele~ se eede ,~elO LUelSe/~ eql Joj sul~!sep 5u!uoz pue 5u!uueld eR!suaqa~dtuoo peqs!lqelsa eql q3!a~ 3uels!suoo s! 1sanbe~ ~no 'g · ,{1.~!1oe le.ulsnpu, pue sseu!snq 'lePJetutuoo seSeJnoos.p pue eade eql Jo ~lneeq pue Jeloe~eqo lequap.saJ. . eleosdn e q I 5m~JesaJd. u . ~ I1 ~eo U. u§. s lS!sse i1.~ e.uel.uo u§!sep ,~e/~peo~ 'peleJepom ia,{ 'elenbepe pasodoJd Jno 'p -peJep!suoo eq Plnoqs loejja Jel!tU!S Jo seo!^ep JGLIIO pue §u!deospuel lepads 'su§!sep uo!loes~alU! e^.loeJlle 'sde~lJeuJ ,{e/~/ulue e^!leJooep jo esn snop!pnl' 'se^!loe.[qo elqeJ!sep eJe seeJe le!luap!seJ leJru s/~elO lseAA loelOJd pue aleeu!laP leU1 ,(~10 }seAA ~o ,(I!UnLUtUOO eq.L OlU. s,{e/~ ~J),u:] ',{elO 1seAA u! paleu!u~!le eq plnoqs s,~e/*~Ped ',(e/~ jo slq6p ]ooj OL Joj ap!^oJd Plnoqs s,{e/~peoJ ~olOallOO 'eaJe eq), jo 'lie lOU J! 'lSOLU u! OgOg Jea~ aU1 q§noJql PETITION TO THE COMMISSIONERS OF HAMILTON COUNTY AND THE PLAN COMMISSION OF CARMEL, INDIANA The undersigned are owners of residential real estate in western Clay Township in Hamilton County, Indiana. As owners and taxpayers we respectfully submit this petition for the purpose of: Soliciting your support for preserving the rural residential character of The Community of West Clay (herein sometimes referred to as "West Clay"). Encouraging you to establish criteria for West Clay roadways that: (a) makes reasonable provision for future traffic needs and (b) minimizes the taking of private property for roadways and intersections. Opposing the proposed re-zoning and development project of Duke Realty and'- its associated investors located at and surrounding the intersections at US 31, 96th Street and Interstate 465. We oppose the Duke development because it will "gddlock" traffic in an area of two to three miles surrounding the intersection. We ask that each of your respective bodies, acting within the scope of their jurisdiction, vote to reject the re-zoning request, in its present form. If the project is approved in any form, it should be so designed that traffic generated therefrom not overwhelm the reasonable residential roadways proposed for West Clay. Moreover, the proposed Duke development will have a devastating effect upon our neighbors, commercial and residential, in the northern Marion County area immediately and remotely adjacent to the 96a and Meridian intersection site. We ask you to support and vote for: a. Preserving the beautiful residential and estate properties and discouraging commercial/industrial encroachment through zoning classifications and related public improvements in West Clay. b. Roadways and intersections in West Clay that minimize the taking of private property and yet serve the reasonable future traffic needs of the area. We 13elieve that: 1. The above objectives can be achieved by utilizing arterial rights of way that are no greater than 90 feet in width. We oppose dghts of way that are greater than 90 feet in width. Such sprawling vistas discourage residential retention and encourage commercial/industrial development. They are diametrically opposed to the preservation-of-land objective as set forth in the comprehensive plan for residential Western Clay Township. 2. A 90 foot arterial right of way provides space for four - 12 foot traffic lanes, a 16 foot median/left turn lane (5 lanes in all), curbs, 50 foot radius tums with tapers (WB-15 semi), 3 foot buffer strips, 6 foot Multi-Use Paths, 2 feet for other utilities services and enclosed surface water drainage. The Level of Service ("LOS") of this configuration is LOS "C" or better SelU Jno,~ Joj/<doo e u!~}eJ es=eld SS~QQ¥ =IINYN 'pel!o!lOS ,{llseuJee s! uo!l!led s!ql jo 1Joddns Jno,k 'suo!loesJelU! lee J],S ~9~ L pue peoEI eu/~ol pue leeJlS ~9~ ~ pue ii!tuSu.uds eql le ,(PelnO!lJed pue ',{elO lseM u! suo!loesJelu! eq), JoJ pJepuels eql se peldope eq u}eJeq qpoj les epel.uo eql leql ~lse eM 'lUeLUe^OJdLU! JOJ peloa.i'oJd suo!loaSJelU! eJOtU Jo Ual eql Je^o ~ff:$ o~, IN~$ jo sSu!^es ¥ *uo!loasJalU! Jed 000'00C$ o1 000'00~$ jo s§u~es V 'slso3 uo!lorulsuoo u! o/o~L o1%01, pue §uptel puel u! %0C se qontu se a^es u~3 ejJe:Luo u§!sep elqeuoseeJ jo uo!ldop¥ ',,peulS!seo Je^O,, aJe ,(eq/ 'qoea 00'000'000'~$ ol 00'000'000'~$ uJoJj eJeqA,~ue 1soo 'pesododd se 'suo!loesJa}ul '9 · esn puel o1 peleleJ se eeJe ~elO uJelse~ eqi Joj su§!sep 5u!uoz pue 5u!uueld e^!suetleJduJoo peqs!lqelse eq3 q}!~ 3uels!suoo s! lSenbaJ Jn0 '~ '/q.~!loe leplsnpu! pue sseu!snq 'lepJeuJLuoo se~eJnoos!p pue eeJe eql jo ,~lneeq pue JaloeJeq3 le!iuep!seJ aleosdn aq~, IBu!AJeseJd u! ,~llueou!u§!s 1$!sse II!/~ epel!Jo u§!sep/[e/~peoJ 'pe~,eJepom ie,~ 'elenbape pesodoJd Jno 't~ 'peJep!suo3 eq PlnOqs 13ejje Jel!UJ!S Jo seo!^ep Jeqlo pue §u!deospuel lepeds 'su§!sep uo!loesJelU! e^!lOeJlle 'sJe~JeLu ,~e/~/ulua e^!leJOOep jo esn snop!pn~' 'se^!13e!qo elqeJ!sep eJe seeJe le!luep!seJ leJnJ s.~elo lSeN~ lOeloJd pue eleeU!lep leql/[elO lSeN~ jo ~iiuntuuJOO aq_L olu! s,{e/~/dlu~] 'S '/[elO 1SaM u! peleu!mJle eq plnoqs s/~eM~Jed '/~eM JO Siq6p iOOJ 0/- JOJ ep!^oJd plnoqs sXeMpeoJ jolOellO0 'eeJe eql jo 'lie 1ou j! '1souJ u! OEO~ Jee,~ eql q6noJqi PETITION TO THE COMMISSIONERS OF HAMILTON COUNTY AND THE PLAN COMMISSION OF CARMEL, INDIANA The undersigned are owners of residential real estate in western'Clay Township in Hamilton County, Indiana. As owners and taxpayers we respectfully submit this petition for the purpose of: Soliciting your support for preserving the rural residential character of The Community of West Clay (herein sometimes referred to as "West Clay"). Encouraging you to establish criteria for West Clay roadways that: (a.) makes reasonable provision for future traffic needs and (b) minimizes the taking of private property for roadways and intersections. Opposing the proposed re-zoning and development project of Duke Realty and its associated investors located at and surrounding the intersections at US 31, 96th Street and Interstate 465. We oppose the Duke development because it will "gddlock" traffic in an area of two to three miles surrounding the intersection. We ask that each of your respective bodies, acting within the scope of their jurisdiction, vote to reject the re-zoning request, in its present form. If the project is approved in any form, it should be so designed that traffic generated therefrom not overwhelm the reasonable residential roadways proposed for West Clay. Moreover, the proposed Duke development will have a devastating effect upon our neighbors, commercial and residential, in the northern Marion County area immediately and remotely adjacent to the 96"' and Meddian intersection site. We ask you to support and vote for: a. Preserving the beautiful residential and estate properties and discouraging .commercial/industrial encroachment through zoning classifications and related public improvements in West Clay. b. Roadways and intersections in West Clay that minimize the taking of private property and yet serve the reasonable future traffic needs of the area. We believe that: 1. The above objectives can be achieved by utilizing arterial rights of way that are no greater than 90 feet in width. We oppose dghts of way that are greater than 90 feet in width. Such sprawling vistas discourage residential retention and encourage commercial/industrial development. They are diametrically opposed to the preservation-of-land objective as set forth in the comprehensive plan for residential Western Clay Township. 2. A 90 foot arterial right of way provides space for four - 12 foot traffic lanes, a 16 foot median/left turn lane (5 lanes in all), curbs, 50 foot radius tums with tapers (WB-15 semi), 3 foot buffer strips, 6 foot Multi-Use Paths, 2 feet for other utilities services and enclosed surface water drainage. The Level of Service ("LOS") of this configuration is LOS "C" or better salu ~no,~ ~o~ ,~doo · u!ela~ eSeald ~3161¥N · pel!oUos ~llSeUJee s! uolljled slql jo 1Joddns Jno)~ 'suo!loesJelU! ~,eeJl$ ~9L L pue peo1:l eu~o/pue leeJ1S ~9[ L pue iiFu§updS eLI1 3e ~Pelno~ed pue ',(elO lseAA u! suo!JoesJelU! aU1Joj pJepuels eql se peldOpe eq uieJeq qpoj les e.Uel.UO aql leU1 ~ise · lUeLUe^oJduJ! Joj peloe.[oJd suo!}oesJalu! a Join Jo ual aLII Je^O IN~:$ ol [N~$ JO sSul^es V 'uo!l:)esJelU! Jed 000'00~:$ 01 000'00~$ JO S~UI^~S y 's}sO0 uo!}on~}suoo u! %g~ o$ %0~ pue §uJ:~e:l pu~I u! %0~ se qonLu se e^e$ ueo epelpo u§!$ep elqeuoseeJ Jo UO!ldop¥ ',,peul~!se0 ~e^o. eJe ~eqJ. 'qoee 00'000'000'£$ Ol 00'000'000'~$ u~o~j eJeq~ue 1soo 'pe~odoJd se '$uo!~oes~e~ul '9 · esn puel Ol peleleJ se ease ~elO welse~ aU1 JOj su§!sep 5u!uoz pue 5u!uueld e^!sueqe~dtuoo petls!lqe~sa au1 tl~!~ ~,ua~s!suoo s. lsenbe~ Jn0 -g · ,(1!^71oe leplsnpu! pue ssau.$nq 'le.~Jewwoo seSeJnoos!p pue eede aU1 jo ~lneeq pue Jel:)eJeq::) le?luep!seJ eleosdn au1 6u?~ese~d u! ~(llt~eoy!u6!s ls!sse I1~ epel.uo uO!sep ,(e~peod 'peleJepotu la,~ 'elenbepe pesododd dno 'P 'peJep!suoo aq plnoqs PeLla Jel!tU!s jo seoI^ep Jeqlo pue 6u)deospuel le.~eds 'su§lsap uo!loesJelu! e^!)oe~Lle 'sde~ueud Xe~ ~dlua e^!1eJooep ~o ash snop!Pnr 'se^!lOe!qo elqeJ.sep e~e seede le!luep!sm leJm s. XelO 1seAA loelo~d pue eleeu!leP leql Xelo lseAA jo XI!UnL~UJOO eq.L olu! s,~e~/~tU::l '~ · XelO lSaM u! peleu!uJ!le eq plnoqs sXeM~ued ',(eM JO SiHSp lOOJ 0/. JOj ep!^oJd PlnOqs s,~eMpeoJ JolOellO0 'eeJe eql Jo 'lie lou J! 'lsotu u! 0~0~ Jee,( aql q6noJql PETITION TO THE COMMISSIONERS OF HAMILTON COUNTY AND THE PLAN COMMISSION OF CARMEL, INDIANA The undersigned are owners of residential real estate in westem Clay Township in Hamilton County, Indiana. As owners and taxpayers we respectfully submit this petition for the purpose of: Soliciting your support for preserving the rural residential character of The Community of West Clay (herein sometimes referred to as "West Clay"), Encouraging you to establish criteda for West Clay roadways that: (a) makes reasonable provision for future traffic needs and (b) minimizes the taking of private property for roadways and intersections, Opposing the proposed re-zoning and development project of Duke Realty and its associated investors located at and surrounding the intersections at US 31, 96th Street and Interstate 465. We oppose the Duke development because it will 'gridlock" traffic in an area of two to three miles surrounding the intersection. We ask that each of your respective bodies, acting within the scope of their jurisdiction, vote to reject the re-zoning request, in its present form. If the project is approved in any form, it should be so designed that traffic generated therefrom not overwhelm the reasonable residential roadways proposed for West Clay. Moreover, the proposed Duke development will have a devastating effect upon our neighbors, commercial and residential, in the northern Marion County area immediately and remotely adjacent to the 96~ and Meridian intersection site. We ask you to support and vote for: a. Preserving the beautiful residential and estate properties and discouraging commercial/industrial encroachment through zoning classifications and related public improvements in West Clay. b. Roadways and intersections in West Clay that minimize the taking of private property and yet serve the reasonable future traffic needs of the area. We believe that: 1. The above objectives can bo achieved by utilizing artedal dghts of way that are no greater than 90 feet in width. We oppose rights of way that are greater than 90 feet in width. Such sprawling vistas discourage residential retention and encourage commercial/industrial development. They are diametrically opposed to the preservation-of-land objective as set forth in the comprehensive plan for residential Western Clay Township. 2. A 90 foot arterial right of way provides space for four - 12 foot traffic lanes, a 16 foot median/left tum lane (5 lanes in all), curbs, 50 foot radius tums with tapers 0NB-15 semi), 3 foot buffer strips, 6 foot Multi-Use Paths, 2 feet for other utilities services and enclosed surface water drainage. The Level of Service ('LOS') of this configuration is LOS 'C" or better selU ~noA~ Joj ~doo e Ule}e, eseeld SS'd~IQQV ~gk~VN · pe}?O!lOS Xl3SeuJee s! uop,!}ed s!q , jo l oddns Jno, 'suo!loesJelU! leeJ1s ~gL I. pue peoEI eu/~oJ, pue l~JlC~ ~9[ l, pue Ii?tu§upds eql le ,{Pelno?lJed pue ',{elO }seAA u! suo.~esJelut eql JOJ pJepuels eql se pe),dope eq u!eJeq qpoj les e.ueLuo eql letll ~tse eM · lueme^oJdm? Joj peloe[oJd suo?loesJelu! eJOtU do ual eql JeAo IAI~:$ o3 IN~$ ~o SSu!Aes V 'uo?lDesJalU! Jed 000'00C$ ol 000'00~$ ~o sSu~es V 'slsoo uo?lorulsuoo u? %gL o1%0~ pue 8uplel puel u! %0£ se qomu se e^es um ~Pel.UO u6!sep elqeuos~e] ~o UO!ldoPV ',,peu6!sea Je/~o,, e~e ,{eLIl 00'000'000'~:$ Ol O0'O00'O00'Z$ U~O~J e~eq/,~u~ 1soo 'pesodo~d se 'suop, oes~elui '9 · esn puel Ol peleleJ se eeJe ,~elO uJelse/~ ecll Joj su§!sep 6uluoz pu~ 5u!uu~ld e^!sueqeJdmOO peqs!lq~,se atp, q~!~ luels!suoo s! isenbeJ Jn0 -~ · ~!^Boe le.ulsnpu! pue sseu!snq 'lepJewuJoo seSeJnoos!p pue eeJe eql jo ~}neeq pue JeloeJetio lelluap!seJ eleosdn eq~ 5Ul~JasaJd u? Xllt~eoylu§ls is!sse ii.t~ e!Jel!JO u§jsep ~e/~peoJ 'pele~epotu ~,a,~ 'elenbepe pesodoJd dnO -p 'peJep!suoo eq plnoqs loejje JellUJ!S jo seo.~ep Jaqlo pue 5u!deospuel lepads 'su~sep uo!loesJelU! e^?loeJlle 'sJe~uetu ~e~ XJlue e^!leJooep ~o esn snop!pnr 'se^!lOa.~qo elqeJ!sep eJe seeJe leguep!seJ leJnJ s.~el0 lse/v~ lOelOJd pue aleeu!lep leql ~el0 1seNt jo/~I!unLuLuoC) eq.L olu! s,(e~ XJlU3 'S '&eld 1saM u! peleu?uJ!le eq Plnoqs s,(eMqJed ',(eM JO slq§P 0Z JOJ ep!^oJd plnoqs s,(eMpeoJ JOlOellOC) 'eaJe eq} jo 'lie lou j! 'lsotu u! 0~0[: Jee/[ eql ql~noJtll [ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS PLANNERS July 28, 1999 Mr. Dave Cremeans, President Cannel Clay Planning Commission City of Carmel One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 Attn. Mr. Michael P. Hollibaugh, R.L.A. Re: Traffic Impact Study Technical Review Duke Realty, 96th Street & Meridian Street Carmel, Indiana HNTB Project No. 31363-PL-001-001 Dear Mr. Cremeans: HNTB has completed our final review of the A&F Engineering Company's Traffic Impact Analysis Report and supplemental analyses for the proposed Duke development in the area of 96th and Meridian Street. Our initial review letter dated May 27, 1999 indicates that we agree with the analysis methods used by A&F in their report; however, we recommended that additional efforts be made in presenting their findings. As a result of the June 1, 1999 Planning Commission Committee Meeting, it was made a condition that A&F address the findings of our review. The requested additional analyses and figures have been received fi:om A&F, and we are now able to offer final review comments. The supplemental memorandum generated by A&F, dated July 19, 1999, clearly establishes what improvements will be required for the surrounding traffic system in order to accommodate the anticipated 2009 Base Year conditions. Each site development scenario (Existing Zoning, Comprehensive Plan, and Proposed Duke Development Plan) was separately analyzed to determine what additional improvements would be required to handle the associated increased traffic volumes. For this study, it was agreed that, as a minimum, Level of Service D (LOS D) must be maintained. This study and comparison procedure is in direct accordance to what was requested in our init/al review. The analysis results indicate the following: 96th Street will need to be widened to four lanes in order to adequately handle 2009 Base Year traffic volumes (existing traffic volumes + vacant land generated traffic volumes + year 2009 traffic volumes with lane configuration needed to achieve LOS D). Four lanes will continue to accommodate increased traffic volumes under all three development scenarios. · Improvements can be made to the existing road system to provide the minimum acceptable LOS D for all site development scenarios. These improvements include those required to Mr. Dave Cremeans Cannel Clay Planning Commission July 28, 1999 Page 2 meet the 2009 Base Year conditions and the additional intersection approach lanes required to accommodate site development traffic. In order to accommodate 2009 Base Year traffic volumes, the addition of an exclusive westbound fight-mm lane is necessary at the intersection of 96th Street and Meridian Street. The addition of left mm lanes on all approaches are required at the intersection of 96th Street and Spring Mill Road. The Duke development lane configuration details included in the A&F supplemental analyses letter meet the requirements of providing an acceptable LOS D for 96th Street, the intersection of 96th and Meridian Street and the intersection of 96th Street and Spring Mill Road. The required Duke development roadway improvements can be accommodatext with the right-of-way that Duke has established for their project. The Duke development scenario (existing traffic volumes + vacant land generated traffic volumes + year 2009 traffic volumes + proposed development generated traffic volumes with lane configuration proposed by A&F Engineering to achieve LOS D) will require five (5) more approach lanes at the intersection of 96th and Meridian Street than the 2009 Base Year condition. The added approach lanes include a second and third eastbound left-mm lane; a second southbound right-tam lane; and second westbound exclusive left-turn and fight-tarn lanes. The Duke development will impact the adjacent roadway system more than the Existing Zoning plan (existing traffic volumes + vacant land generated traffic volumes + year 2009 traffic volumes + Existing Zoning plan generated traffic volumes with lane configuration proposed by A&F Engineering to achieve LOS D) by requiring two (2) more additional approach lanes at the intersection of 96th and Meridian Street. The added approach lanes include a third eastbound left-mm lane, and a second westbound exclusive left-turn lane. The Duke development will produce less of an impact to the adjacent roadway system than the Comprehensive plan (existing traffic volumes + vacant land generated traffic volumes + year 2009 traffic volumes + Comprehensive plan generated traffic volumes with lane configuration proposed by A&F Engineering to achieve LOS D) by requiting one (1) less southbound exclusive left-turn lane at the intersection of 96th and Meridian Street, and one (1) fewer eastbound and westbound exclusive left-tm lanes at the intersection of 96th Street and Springxnill Road. As a separate issue, it is now understood that the proposed Duke development middle drive that did not meet the minimum Level of Service D requirements will be a stop controlled intersection and not controlled by a traffic signal as was interpreted in our initial review. The traffic signals at Springmill Road, the Duke west drive and at Meridian Street should provide enough gaps in Mr. Dave Cremeans Cannel Clay Planning Commission July 28, 1999 Page 3 the traffic stream to allow for adequate traffic movement out of this drive. The signalized west drive is spaced relative to the other intersections so that there should be good progression along 96th Street. HNTB agrees with the analysis methods used by A&F and concurs with their findings. The results of the Traffic Impact Analysis Report and supplemental analyses show that the proposed Duke development can be accommodated with logical improvements to the road system. Please feel flee to contact either Steve Swango or myself to further discuss these issues. Sincerely, HNTB CORPORATION Paul B. Satterly, P.E. Project Manager PBS/SLS/sls CCl Mr. John E. Kupke, P.E., HNTB Corporation Mr. Steven L. Swango, HNTB Corporation