HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication CiTY OF CARMEL - CLAY TOWNSI,I~
HAMILTON COUNTY~ INDIANA
APPLICATION FOR BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ACTION
DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE REC~UEST
DOCKET NO,
1) Applicant: Roehlinq Enterorises, Inc.
DATE RECEIVED:
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
Address: 11722 Bradford Place. Carmel. IN 46033
Project Name: Brighton Woods Subdivision
Engineer/Amhitect:
Attorney: Mark T. Monroe Phone: 580-4848
Applicant's Status: (Check the appropriate response)
(a) The applicant's name is on the deed to the property
(b) The applicant is the contract pumhaser of the property
X (c) Other: Applicant is the developer and builder of the subdivision
If Item 3) (c) is checked, please complete the following:
Owner ofthe property involved: Roehlinq Enterprises. Inc.
Phone: 846-8881
Phone:
Owner's address: same as applicant Phone: same as applicant
Record of Ownership:
Instrument No.: 9940773/200200045713
Page: Purchase date: Fall, 1998
Common address of the property involved: 11895- 12087 Dubarry Drive; 11703 - 11847 Dubarry Ct.
Legal description: Lots 5-14 and 21-27 in the Bri,qhton Woods Subdivision
Tax Map Parcel Nos.: 16-10-34-03-11-001.000-16-10-34-03-11-010.000: 16-10-34-00-10-001.000-16-10-34-
00-10-007.000
State explanation of requested Developmental Standards Variance: (State what you want to do and cite the
section number(s) of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance which applies and/or creates the need for this request).
Variance request from Section 25.02.02 of Carmel Zonina Ordinance, to increase the maximum allowable heiqht
of the fence at the rear of the properties from six (6~ feet to eiaht ~8) feet.
8)
9)
State reasons supporting the Developmental Standards Variance: (Additionally, complete the attached question
sheet entitled "Findings of Fact-Developmental Standards Variance").
Six feet does not provide the homeowners in Bri.qhton Woods or Northwood Hills subdivisions with adequate
privacy.
Present zoning of the property (give exact classification): S-I/Residence
lO)
11)
12)
Size of Iot/pamel in question: approximately 5 acres
Present use of the property: residential
Describe the proposed use of the property: residential
13)
14)
Is the property: Owner occupied X
Renter occupied
Other
Are there any restrictions, laws, covenants, variances, special uses, or appeals filed in connection with this
property that would relate or affect its use for the specific purpose of this application? If yes, give date and docket
number, decision rendered and pertinent explanation.
Filed 04-06-2000; Docket # 200000015796: Briahton Woods Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions
15)
16)
17)
Has work for which this application is being filed already started? If answer is yes, give details:
Building Permit Number:
Builder: Roehlin(3 Enterorises has already built homes and a fence ~which is the subiect of this variance)
If proposed appeal is granted, when will the work commence?
as soon as possible
If the proposed variance is granted, who will operate and/or use the proposed improvement for which this
application has been filed?
Bri.qhton Woods residents
AFFIDAVIT
I, hereby swear that I am the attorney for the applicant involved in this application and that the foregoing signatures,
statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the
best of my knowledge and belief.
Mark T. Monroe, Attorney for Roehlina Enterodses. Inc.
(Please Print)
STATE OF INDIANA
SS:
COUNTY OF MARION
Before me the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and.State, personally appeared
Monroe and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument this Z--~~, day of May, 2004.
u licl~ori Garrison
(SEAL)
Mark T.
Docket No.:
Petitioner:
CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
Carmel, Indiana
Roehlin Enter rises inc.
FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELCP~,',-~NTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheefl
DATED THIS
DAY OF
,20
Board Member
Docket No.:
Petitioner:
CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
CARMEL, INDIANA
Roehlin,q EnterPrises. Inc.
FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE
The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the
community because:
the maximum hei.qht established bv this variance will have no effect on the community.
The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a
substantially adverse manner because:
the variance will increase the use and value of the area because oroDertv owners on both sides of the fence will
have areater privacy.
The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the
use of the property because:
the six-foot fence will lower the homeowner's level of orivacv and therefore will diminish the attractiveness of the
homes to its potential owner. Because the property is zoned S-1 it will be difficult to fully use it to its ProPosed use
unless the variance is aranted.
DECISION
IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Developmental Standards Variance
Docket No. is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this
Board, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof.
Adopted this day of ,20 __
CHAIRPERSON, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals
SECRETARY, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals
Conditions of the Board are listed on the back. (Petitioner or his representative to sign)
S:~carmelclaylanduseregs~checklist~levstandapp
Revised 1/25/2000
0
~z