Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings of FactFindings of Fact Form for Development Plan Consideration Carmel/Clay Plan Commission Carmel, Indiana Docket No.22-99 D.P. Amend./ADLS Name of Project: Hamilton Crossin~ Building 5 Petitioner: Duke Realw Investments 1. The development plan as proposed is a permitted use within the U.S. 31 Overlay Zone as defined by Section 23B.3 of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. 2. The development plan as proposed meets the minimum tract size for a project within the U.S. Overlay Zone as defined in Section 23B.7 of the Carmel/Clay zomg Ordin~ace. 3. The development plan meets the height and area requirements of the U.S. 31 Overlay Zone as defined in Section 23B.8 of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. Dated this ~t0 day of /~ · 199 c~ Plan Commission Membe~' Findings of Fact Form for Development Plan Consideration Carmel/Clay Plan Commission Carmel, Indiana Docket No.22-99 D.P. Amend./ADLS Name of Project: Hamilton Crossing, Building 5 Petitioner: ~ments 1. The development plan as proposed is a p~-mitted use within the U.S. 31 Overlay Zone as defined by Section 23B.3 of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. 2. The development plan as proposed meets the minimum tract size for a project within the U.S. Overlay Zone as defined in Section 23B.7 of the Cannel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. 3. The development plan meets the height and a~ea requirements of the U.S. 31 Overlay Zone as defined in Section 23B.8 of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. Findings of Fact Form for Development Plan Consideration Carmel/Clay Plan Commission Carmel, Indiana Docket No.22-99 D.P. Amend./ADLS Name of Project: Hamilton Crossing. Building 5 Petitioner: Duke Realty Investments 1. The development plan as proposed is a permitted use within the U.S. 31 Overlay Zone as defined by Section 23B.3 of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. 2. The development plan as proposed meets the minimum tract s'tze for a project within the U.S. Overlay Zone as defined in Section 23B.7 of the Cannel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. 3. The development plan meets the height and area requirements of the U.S. 31 Overlay Zone as defined in Section 23B.8 of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. Dated this .~ day of ~ , 199_q~ Plan Comptlssion Member Findings of Fact Form for Development Plan Consideration Carmel/Clay Plan Commission Carmel, Indiana Docket No.22-99 D.P. Amend./ADLS Name of Project: Hamilton Crossing, Building 5 Petitioner: Duke Realty Investments 1. The development plan as proposed is a permitted use within the U.S. 31 Overlay Zone as defined by Section 23B.3 of the Cannel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. 2. The development plan as proposed meets the minimum tract size for a project within the U.S. Overlay Zone as defined in Section 23B.7 of the Cannel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. 3. The development plan meets the height and area requirements of the U.S. 31 Overlay Zone as defined in Section 23B.8 of the Cannel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. Dated this Findings of Fact Form for Development Plan Consideration Carmel/Clay Plan Commission Carmel, Indiana Docket No.22-99 D.P. Amend./ADLS Name of Project: Hamilton Cross'm~ Building 5 Petitioner: Duke Realty lnve~hi~ents 1. The development plan as proposed is a permitted use within the U.S. 31 Overlay Zone as defined by Section 23B.3 of the Cannel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. 2. The development plan as proposed meets the minimum tract size for a project within the U.S. Overlay Zone as defined ia Section 23B.7 of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. 3. The development plan meets the height and area requirements of the U.S. 31 Overlay Zone as defined in Section 23B.8 of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. Plafl'~fi~nis~ion Member Findings of Fact Form for Development Plan Consideration Carmel/Clay Plan Commission Carmel, Indiana Docket No.22-99 D.P. Amend./ADLS Name of Project: Hamilton Crossing, Building 5 Petitioner: Duke Realty Investments 1. The development plan as proposed is a permitted use within the U.S. 31 Overlay Zone as defined by Section 23B.3 of the Cannel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. 2. The development plan as proposed meets the minimtau tract size for a project within the U.S. Overlay Zone as defined in Section 23B.7 of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. 3. The development plan meets the height and area requirements of the U.S. 31 Overlay Zone as defined in Section 23B.8 of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. Dated this day of ~ , 199_~ Findings of Fact Form for Development Plan Consideration Camel/Clay Plan Commission Carmel, Indiana Docket No.22-99 D.P. Amend./ADLS Name of Project: Hamilton Crossing Building 5 Petitioner: Duke Realty_ Investments 1. The development plan as proposed is a permitted use within the U.S. 31 Overlay Zone as defined by Section 23B.3 of the Cannel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. 2. The development plan as proposed meets the minimum tract size for a project within the U.S. Overlay Zone as defined in Section 23B.7 of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. 3. The development plan meets the height and area requirements of the U.S. 31 Overlay Zone as defined in Section 23B.8 of the Cannel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. Dated this day of /J,~r//' , 199.~ Plan Commi~on Member Findings of Fact Form for Development Plan Consideration Cannel/Clay Plan Commission Cannel, Indiana Docket No.22-99 D.P. Amend./ADLS Name of Projeet: Hamilton Crossing, Building 5 Petilioner: Duke Realty Investments 1. The development plan as proposed is a permitted use within the U.S. 31 Overlay Zone as defined by Section 23B.3 of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. 2. The developmem plan as proposed meets the minimum tract size for a project within the U.S. Overlay Zone as defined in Section 23B.7 of the Cannel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. 3. The development plan meets the height and area requirements of the U.S. 31 Overlay Zone as defined in Section 23B.8 of the Cannel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. Dated this ~ day of Findings of Fact Form for Development Plan Consideration Cannel/Clay Plan Commission Cannel, Indiana Docket No.22-99 D.P. Amend./ADLS Name of Project: Hamilton Crossin_~ Building 5 Petitioner: Duke Realty_ Investments 1. The development plan as proposed is a permitted use within the U.S. 31 Overlay Zone as defined by Section 23B.3 of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. 2. The developmem plan as proposed meets the minimum tract size for a project within the U.S. Overlay Zone as defined in Section 23B.7 of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. 3. The development plan meets the height and area requirements of the U.S. 31 Overlay Zone as defined in Section 23B.8 of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. Dated this ~0 day of /~O0,~ t- Findings of Fact Form for Development Plan Consideration Carmel/Clay Plan Commission Cannel, Indiana Docket No.22-99 D.P. Amend./ADLS Name of Project: Hamilton Crossin~ Building 5 Petitioner: Duke Realty Investments 1. The development plan as proposed is a permitted use within the U.S. 31 Overlay Zone as defined by Section 23B.3 of the Cannel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. 2. The development plan as proposed meets the minimum tract size for a project within the U.S. Overlay Zone as defined in Section 23B.7 of the Cannel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. 3. The development plan meets the height and area requiremems of the U.S. 31 Overlay Zone as defined in Section 23B.8 of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. Dated this ~ '~ day of ,~/?~-- ~n Findings of Fact Form for Development Plan Consideration Carmel/Clay Plan Commission Cannel, Indiana Docket No.22-99 D.P. Amend./ADLS Name of Project: Hamilton Crossing, Building 5 Petitioner: Duke Real'tv Investments 1. The development plan as proposed is a permitted use within the U.S. 31 Overlay Zone as defined by Section 23B.3 of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. 2. The development plan as proposed meets the minimum tract size for a project within the U.S. Overlay Zone as defined in Section 23B.7 of the Cannel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. 3. The development plan meets the height and area requirements of the U.S. 31 overlay Zone as defined in Section 23B.8 of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. Dmedthis ~ dayof · 199~ Findings of Fact Form for Development Plan Consideration Cannel/Clay Plan Commission Cannel, Indiana Docket No.22-99 D.P. Amend./ADLS Name of Project: Hamilton Crossing, Building 5 Petitioner: Duke Real Inv 1. The development plan as proposed is a permitted use within the U.S. 31 Overlay Zone as defined by Section 23B.3 of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. 2. The development plan as proposed meets the minimum tract size for a project within the U.S. Overlay Zone as defined in Section 23B.7 of the Cannel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. 3. The development plan meets the height and area requiremants of the U.S. 31 Overlay Zone as defined in Section 23B.8 of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. Dated this ~70~ day of ~ , 199_~_ Plan Co~