Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket revised 8-23-04CARMEL LUTHERAN CHURCH Special Use Amendment Docket No. 04060002SUA Developmental Standards Variance Docket No. 04060003V Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals August 23, 2004 Lawrence J. Kemper NELSON & FRANKENBERGER 3021 East 98th Street, Suite 220 Indianapolis, IN 46280 Telephone' (317) 844-0106 SCANNED TABLE OF CONTENTS o Explanation . Narratives Product Description Design Narrative Drainage Narrative Landscaping Description o Aerial Photograph 4. Colored Site Plan o Site Plan- Existing Site and Proposed Site 6. Floor Plan 1 , LandsCape Plan- Option A and Option B l o Site Lighting Plan Detail o Colored Rendering/Elevations EXPLANATION The applicant, Carmel Lutheran Church (hereafter "Carmel Lutheran"), is the owner of real estate located at the northeast comer of 131st Street and Gray Road. The subject real estate is zoned S-1 and, under the S-1 classification, a church is a permitted special use. Carmel Lutheran's church is expanding, and the existing building is not large enough to accommodate the growing congregation. As a result, Carmel Lutheran desires to construct an expansion to the existing church facility to provide an additional 38,712 square feet, which will be used primarily for (i) the addition of a contemporary worship sanctuary, accompanying narthex, lobby, restrooms, and nursery, (ii) additional classrooms, (iii) a youth room, and (iv) additional office space. Carmel Lutheran is also requesting a developmental standards variance from Section 5.04.03.F of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance to permit the maximum lot coverage to exceed 35%. At the last Board of Zoning Appeals meeting, several neighbors expressed concern regarding the condition of the Scotch pine trees along the northern and eastern property lines, as well as the effect the church's proposal would have on off-site drainage. In addition, several neighbors expressed a desire to have the dry detention basin currently located at the southeast comer of the real estate converted to a wet retention pond. Since the July meeting, the church has analyzed the possibility of adding a wet retention pond to the southeast corner of the real estate, and has determined that adding such a pond is feasible. The site plans included in this brochure reflect the addition of a wet retention pond. The addition of the wet retention pond should not only increase the retention capacity of the pond, but it should also facilitate the reduction of the dispersion rate of water from the retention pond to adjacent drainage ditches and culverts. The net effect is a lessened drainage impact on surrounding properties. This information was conveyed to the surrounding homeowners at a meeting held on August 5, 2004. We look forward to presenting this special use amendment request and developmental standards variance request to the Board of Zoning Appeals on August 23, 2004. Respectfully submitted, Lawrence J. Kem~:~:~ H:\Jancl\Carmcl Luthcmn Church~Explanalion-BZA 082304.doc SCANNED Product Description The proposed expansion to Carmel Lutheran Church is being developed in two different areas. There is a proposed addition with a footprint of 100' x 55' at the northwest corner of the property. The primary use for the lower level of this addition is classroom space. There will be three large, dividable, classrooms that will be used on Sunday for christian education and adult bible study. During the week, it is the intent of the Church to hold community meetings in these spaces such as Weight Watchers, Alcoholics Anonymous, and other community based programming. On the upper level of this addition will consist primarily of a new administrative suite. The current administrative suite is inadequate for current needs, and has resulted in administrative personnel being spread out throughout the complex. Consolidation of these functions will facilitate better communication between staff and better use of shared resources. The 150' x 150' addition proposed on the east end of the facility is being planned as a Contemporary Worship Center. The purpose of this space is primarily Contemporary Worship on Sunday morning, but the space will also be flexible enough for other events throughout the week. The Contemporary Wo.rship Ministry at Carmel Lutheran is reaching a younger audience. It also appeals to those that are not as comfortable with the traditional Lutheran service. With a seating capacity of 550 loose chairs, a flat floor, and flexible acoustics, the space will also be utilized for conferences, receptions, seminars, etc. There is also a narthex and nursery planned to support this space. The contemporary worship activity is currently occurring in the gymnasium space, with poor acoustics, limited seating, no theatrical lighting, poor sight lines, and constant set up and tear down of equipment. On the upper level of the addition proposed on the east end of the facility, there will be a youth room and a game room. These rooms are for junior and senior activities. In addition, there is one classroom and a mechanical room in this area. H:\Janet\Cannei Lutheran Church\Product Description.doc SCANNED Design Narrative The overall site layout and flow of the parking will remain essentially unchanged There will be one entrance off of Gray Road at the northwest comer of the site and one entrance off of 131 ~t Street on the south side of the site. The original access drive onto the property closer to the intersection of 131 st Street and Gray Road will be removed. Parking will include 341 spaces, which represents an increase of 94 spaces over current conditions. This increase is required to alleviate the current practices of parking in the grass and, in some instances, parking across Gray Road at the adjacent Church Facility and crossing Gray Road on foot. The combined capacity of both sanctuaries is 1,150 total. Site lighting will be improved by the removal of all 30' tall poles on the property and replacing these poles with 20' tall poles. The new lighting scheme has been designed to eliminate any light spilling into the adjacent properties. However, there has been an agreement with the neighbors to place the perimeter lighting on a timer and to turn off these lights at 11:00 pm. Lighting to the center of the parking lot or on the building itself will be on a photostat and will remain on all night. The exterior of the proposed addition will be a continuation of the materials, massing colors and detailing that already exist at the facility. The new worship center will be 34' tall and a combination of irregular limestone veneer and cut Indiana limestone, consistent with the existing traditional sanctuary. The roofing material will primarily consist of asphalt shingles. There are small areas of flat roofing that will receive EPDM roofing product. Exterior doors and windows will be dark bronze aluminum. The addition at the northwest corner of the property will be 30' tall and consist of a combination of irregular stone and beige Exterior Insulation Finish System. Entrances will include canopies consistent with the current canopy configurations. The color, dimensions and building materials of this addition will be consistent with the existing structure. The roofing will consist of asphalt shingles. H:\Janet\Cannel Lutheran Church\Design Narrative.doc Drainage Narrative Unlike the existing conditions of the site along the north and east property lines, the proposed site drainage will be collected in storm sewer systems and redirected to a proposed wet retention pond in the southeast comer of the site. The church has proposed to add the wet retention pond in order to provide additional storage, which will detain the additional impervious area from the building and parking lot expansions. The pond will outlet in the same location that it curremly outlets, which is the roadside ditch of 131st Street. The current drainage conditions would allow a flow rate of 5.20 cubic feet per second during a 100-year storm event. The proposed drainage calculations would only allow a flow rate of 1.17 cubic feet per second during a 100-year storm evem. Therefore, the proposed flow from the pond is less than 1/4 of what is allowed today. H:\Janet\CLC\Drainage Description.doc SCANNED Landscaping Description The currem ten-acre site has landscaping sprinkled around the existing building as well as along 131st Street and Gray Road. There is also an extensive buffer of evergreens along the north and east property lines. The proposed site will relocate several of the existing trees as well as add the City of Carmel's most extensive bufferyard requirements to the frontages of 131st Street and Gray Road. The bufferyard level D requires 5 shade trees, 5 omamemal trees and 27 shrubs or 9 evergreens for every 100 lineal feet of frontage. The frontage of 131 st Street is 750 linear feet and the frontage of Gray Road is 500 linear feet. The Ordinance requires the addition of 38 shade trees, 38 omamental trees and 203 shrubs along 131st Street and 25 shade trees, 25 omament trees and 135 shrubs along Gray Road. During a neighborhood meeting at the Church on June 29, 2004, it was discovered that the adjacent neighbors were very concerned about the condition of the existing evergreen trees along the north and east property lines. The evergreens were planted nearly 30 years ago and appear to be reaching their life span. They are all the same species, which is believed to be a Scotch Pine and several are dead or dying. Another concern was voiced regarding drainage off of the Church's property and onto the adjacent owners' property. In response to the neighbors concerns, the Church proposed to remove all of the existing evergreens along the north and east property lines. In order to address both concerns of the neighbors, a 2' 8" high berm was proposed to be constructed between the Church parking lot and the adjacent neighbors which would contain the City of Carmel's most extensive level D bufferyard requirements. The only difference will be that the neighbors wish to have a majority of evergreens planted in place of the shade and ornamental trees. The proposed berm would provide a sufficiem drainage barrier between the Church and the neighbors, while the level D buffeting requiremems would provide a much more visually appealing view. After meeting with the neighbors on June 29, 2004, the Church met with the Department of Community Services staff and the Urban Forester in order to determine if the neighbors proposal was acceptable. After discussing the neighbors proposal, the Urban Forester expressed concern that the neighbors might not realize what they are suggesting and, if the neighbors proposal was implemented, they would be disappointed with the results. In response, the Urban Forester suggested the following compromise: (i) the Church hire an arborist to inspect each Scotch Pine and determine which ones were dead or in the process of dying, (ii) once the dead and dying Scotch Pines were identified, remove anywhere from thirty to fifty percent of the least healthy Scotch Pines in groups such that, in their place, a two-foot landscape berm and level D bufferyard landscaping could be substituted. The church was agreeable to this proposed compromise, hopeful that it could persuade the neighbors to also agree. After meeting with the Urban Forester, the Church again met with the neighbors on July 12, 2004. At that meeting, the church introduced the proposal by which up to fifty percent of the least healthy Scotch Pines would be removed and replaced with level D landscaping buffering. Despite expressing the Urban Forester's concerns to the neighbors, the neighbors SOANNED still insisted upon removal of all Scotch Pines along the northern and eastern boundaries of the property, except for a few White Pines in the southeast comer. Landscape Option A, as set forth in Exhibit 7 of this informational brochure, represents the landscape proposal favored by the neighbors. Option A results in removal of almost all of the existing Scotch Pines. Alternatively, Landscape Option B, also set forth in Exhibit 7 of this informational brochure, illustrates the landscape proposal favored by the Urban Forester, which results in removal of a maximum of fifty percent of the Scotch Pines presently existing on the property. The church is agreeable to either proposal, and seeks the guidance of the Board of Zoning Appeals as to whether Landscaping Option A or Option B should be implemented. H:XJanetSCarmel Lutheran Church~andscaping Descripfion.~ff SCANNED TREE LEGEND DEC UOUS TREES REDMUND LINDEN AUTUMN GOLD GINGKO EXISTING SHADE TREE SHADEMASTER HONEYLOCUST TRICOLOR BEECH FLAME AMUR MAPLE SNOWFOUNTAIN WEEPING CHERRY EVERGREEN TREES FIR NORWAY SPRUCE COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE FAT ALBERT BLU£ SPRUCE' CANADIAN HEMLOCK ~£PING HEMLOCK BLACK HILLS SPRUCE EXIST!NS EVERGREEN 0505 N, COLLEGE AVE, INDIANAP~tS~ iN (3't 7)~0546 C armel Lutheran /'/ I'/ I'C h rm I Lutheran Church ' xi ting ite El: 787.88 · , ,. /' 4" PVC R~of Drain 'shown per Plans, not field verified" 12.0' ' ................... FTE: 799.26 / 'Bo~er RoomZ ..... FFE: 799.25 Carmel Lutheran Church ....... i:-',':: ..::i~. ........ '~ [ rrE:799'~--~:799.~6'5' ,N,,, ~i' ~7 ::,&. ~' Masonry/Framed Bu, ld,ng '"' '<"":,iR,7::' (4¢,9¢7 Sq. ?oof;pn.t) ~..-,: ...... Carmel Lu'~heran Church, M~ssoun Synod 6- ~ Roar ~ro~, Deed Record 30 I, 7,55. -shown per P/ans. .:/: I , ~.,.,.. page .o, ,,e,d ver*~,ed' ,,~a: "' ~racea A * ~ = ' O. O0 Acres ~) ,~.,,,,,- ~' ,, ~=, ~o~ field "Uoin Entrance"x~~ .: * ...... .::. .: ::::::: ' F~: 799.28 "' ... ~ ...... '" q ~,.x~ ...--~ .- .,. . ....... .. . , .. , . ;: ........... ~_ ..]' ~ ........ I .. abandoned"' TC: 794.45 (Clogged) .. 797 ............ .... ...... ..... .. · ......... El: 797.18 ~,. / Curb Inlet "- TC'~6C: 794.81 / ~0"-792.6 12'- 792.2 :' ~ ....... ' \,. "',/"Curb Inlet ~ 'I ....... / Teac: 794. B8 I ' ......... //-- Inv. 18"-791.7 i: ~ Inv. 12'-791.9 , ................... - .............. ' ......... ...... ; ................................... 792 .......... ............. .. .. Son.". MH . T C: 793.57 Inv. 789..t .... .. Exis~.in~ ~+.~ntion ~asin '" 79! ............... TBM I/3 · --£1: 7~3. 77 ..... I : !' : : Fiber Optic '" ':' El' 789 35 ---, Play House "Encroachment" X frn r 4-Wire Pines1 ,, __ 20' 0 ........ -::,,.'.-? 1 020 .. ...-- E1:.'789.3',~ ......................... 790 ................ 40.00' ..... 791 "~; J -uANNEE: Carme~ Luthersn Church Sa nc tuary A ddition ~H s Head Our Hands" We lOve because He first loved us~ -i john 4 19 bu Bali.rig B fi~St fioor overall first floor Plan .sca/e; C~rme~ £uthera~ Church Sanctuary Addition "His Heart~..Our Hands" We~/ove because H® first/oved us. -~ John buidling B second floor building D second floor overall second floor plan sca[e: 1/16~- I'-0" SCHMIDT ASSOCIATES SCANNED August 16, 2004 Mike Engledow Schmidt and Associates 320 E Vermont Indianapolis IN 46204 Tree Care Landscaping Consulting Services Re: Scotch or Scots pines (Pinus sylvestris)at Carmel Lutheran :t31st Gray Rd. Executive Summary It is my opinion that whole north and the eastern border of scotch pines at Carmel Lutheran should be removed and replaced with an evergreen of non-pine species. Scotch pines are a weak species with many pest problems that bring about decline and death. The continued care of these trees is a wasted expense to the Church because the trees will never improve but will continue to decline and die. Removal and replacement is a more efficient use of the Churches money as it will save the Church money in the long run. History Hike Engledow asked that ! make a site visit to advise him on the condition of the Scotch pines that line the north and east perimeter of the property. I counted 123 trees, 67 of which are on the north and 45 on the east. There are a few native species trees and some white pines in the rows also which I did not count. Of the 123 Scotch pines 11 are dead. The rest are in need of crown cleaning and care. Data on Scotch Pines from Ohio State DNR Scotch pine (Pinus sylvestris) An evergreen tree from the Pine Family (Pinaceae) Scotch pine, an evergreen conifer, is native to northern Europe and northern Asia, from Scotland to Siberia. lit has been widely planted and naturalized throughout northeastern and Midwestern North America for centuries, lit is commonly found in Ohio, where it is grown in urban areas as an ornamental evergreen tree, in rural areas of poor soil as a tree for erosion control or for primary establishment, or on Christmas tree plantations, lit is logged at maturity in Europe as an important timber tree, and cut in youth in America as one of the most popular Christmas trees. 4721 E. 146th Street · Carmel, Indiana 46033 · Phone: 317-846-1935 · Fax' 317-846-3788 Treeconsultant@aol.com o www.vineandbranch.net SCANNED Also known as Scots Pine (in reference to Scotland of Great Britain), this pine has a crooked or twisted trunk that may split into several widely divergent branches at maturity, thus forming a picturesque crown of gnarled branches. Frequently leaning with age, it may grow to 50 feet tall by 30 feet wide when found in the open, with a medium growth rate in youth and slow growth rate with age. :[ts shape is more or less upright pyramidal when young, but quickly becomes irregular and contorted, as if twisted by the wind. As a member of the Pine Family, it is related to other Pines as well as the Firs, Larches, Spruces, and Hemlocks. Planting Requirements - Scotch pine does best in well-drained soils of acidic pM, but is known for its tolerance of poor soils that may be sandy, rocky, or of heavy clay, and of acidic, neutral, or alkaline pM. ]:t thrives on neglect in full sun, and tolerates prolonged drought. :It grows in zones 3 to 7. Potential Problems- Scotch pine is less susceptible than Austrian Pine to Diplodia tip blight, but still contracts this disease with fatal results. In addition, it also is vulnerable to pine wilt fungus and the pests known as nematodes. However, this pine is very tough in its adaptation to environmental stresses, including heat, drought, and severe cold and sterile soils. Discussion As can be seen from the Ohio State information and from a visual inspection of the trees in question they are not to be considered maintenance free trees. In my opinion the whole north and east space should be reworked to allow for a more interactive use of the entire space. This would include either the removal of all the pines and replacement with trees from the spruce or fir family or an extensive care program. The 10 year prognosis for these trees is continued decline, death and expense. Much care will be needed to keep the various diseases from spreading and leading to more tree death. There are two distinct approaches which ! see for this area. ! attach as an addendum a break down of costs to illustrate each. Discussion of the tree approaches is' Approach #1- Total Removal Approach This first option would be removal of all 123 trees and replacement with 125 or more new evergreens. Spruce and fir are the best choice as they are less affected by pests. Spruce may need care during droughts to limit mites. This is the most expensive route in the short term but may actually save money in the long term. Approach #2- Current Approach Remove trees as they die and replace with new trees. This approach is the most cost effective approach in the short term. ]:t is not taking into consideration that 20-30 homeowners or more may be upset with the Church because their back yards are unsightly due to deadwood in the trees. Some of these homeowners may actually experience property devaluation due to unsightliness of the trees. Schmidt Assoc. Carmel Luther 8/1/04 SCANNED Conclusion :It is my opinion that whole north and the eastern border of scotch pines at Carmel Lutheran should be removed and replaced with an evergreen of non-pine species. Scotch pines are a weak species with many pest problems that bring about decline and death. The continued care of these trees is a wasted expense to the Church because the trees will never improve but will continue to decline and die. Removal and replacement is a more efficient use of the Churches money as it will save the Church money in the long run. ! certify that all the statements of fact in this report are true, complete and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, and that they are made in good faith. All cost information is made for comparison purposes and should not be seen as an estimate. Hopefully the pricing is quoted on the high side and might come in less if bid out. 3udson R. Scott President, Vine & Branch Inc. Registered Consulting Arborist #392 American Society of Consulting Arborists Schmidt Assoc. Carmel Luther 8/1/04 SCANNED Addendum---Cost information for comparison AcLion Plan projections for Discussion 1. Rehioval of all Tree removal for all 123 trees- Stump removal for 123 stumps ~R_~placement with new trees 1 Current plan Removal of trees as they die ~- 10 ~ear x !0 ~er tree ~lacement 10 ~ear x 10 years ~ 45_~er tree Total Total $10,000-12,000 8OO 30,000-5~ 40~800-62 80L~~__O $22,00_ 0 45,oo __9_o $77,00_ 0 Schmidt Assoc. Carmel Luther 8/1/04 SCANNED WEIHE EHGINEERS~ INC. 105~ N'r COLLEGE AVE~ ~NDtA~i~O~LI$~ tN (317) ~ C Ea~ / 31 ~ 5tree~ arr el Luther' n TREE LEGEND DEC UOUS TREES REDMUND LINDEN AUTUMN GOLD GINGKO EXISTING SHADE TREE StfADEMASTER HONEYLOCUST TRICOLOR BEECH FLAME AMUR MAPLE SNO~,~OUNTAIN WEEPING CHERRY EVERGREEN TREES NOR V~tA Y SPRUCE COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE FAT ALBERT BLUE SPRUCE CANAD!AN HEMLOCK VCEEP~;NG HEMLOCK BLACK HELS SPRUCE EXISTING EVERGREEN A - 100% ED TREE LEGEND DECIDUOUS TREES f?£DIvIUND LINDEN E?.?S TiWG .:?HADE TREE SHADEMA S TER HONE YL OCUS T 7~g/COL OR BEECH FLAME AMUR MAPLE SN©WFOUN TAIN ~&}TPfNC CHERRY EVERGREEN TREES ~;Hi ?£" F/R NOR ~;4 Y .S?,EUCE COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE FA T ALBERT BLUE SPRUCE CANADIAN H£~¥:fL OCK WEEP/NC HEMLOCK BLACK HILLS SPRUCE WEIHE ENGINEERS~ INC, 10505 N COLLEGE AVE tNDIANAF~,~_~$, tN (317) Carm'el Luthel'an Design Option B - 50% Removal Church ~.o ~oo ~.o ~,o ~,o bo ~.o ~,o ~.o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ho ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~.o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~. bo ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~.o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~.o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ho ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~.o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o ~,o bo ~,o ~,o *0.0 ~,0 ~0,0 ~0,0 +4,~!~,4 ; ~,0 ~,0 ~,0 1.! ~3,7 *4,4 ~,7 ID,O "0.0 '0,1 b,O ~,4 1,7 13,3 b,3 1:).o b.o 1:).o' t),o 1:),o ~,o b,o ~.o ~,o ~,o ~.o ~.o ~,o ' ~.o b;o ~.o. ~,0 ~.o ~.o .b,o b.o ~3,1 +4,7 ~,1 t,9 *3,2 *4,7 ~,1 "1,9 ~1 b,o b.o.-~.° ~,o b,o ~,o D.o b,o ~.D b,O ~iO ~,0 b,o ~.0 ~,o ~,o b,o bio b.o' b.o b.o ~ b,o ~.o I ~ ~.o b.o b:o ~.o ~.o ~.o {' ~:o b.o b.o ~.o b,o b,o ~ ~',o b.o b,o ~.o b,o ~.o b,o b,o b.o ~.o ~,o b,o ! ~,o b,o b.o ~,o b.o b,o ~,~ ~,o b.o b.o ~,o b. ,:~.;:~ . -!%.0 b,o l~,o b, b,o 1~,o b, ,0 ~3,a *4,8 '~,4 ~,6 ~,7 1,7 110,0 1~,0 !0, _ - ~+~i! t),O I:),0*0. ~.9 ~,a ~.6 ~.9 ~.6 .0 ~.a ~,3 ~,e ~,e ~.6-~ ~,t 1.3 1.6 ~,9 ~ b,o ~,o b, .... _; ].2 ~,2 ~,8 ~,7 ~,3 ..],; ,0 ~.4 ~,0 ~,0 - ! 1.3 ~,5 ~ ~,4 B,5 l,: .~,6 ,9 ~;5- b,O ~,0 .... ...... ,1 3.~ ~.7 ~.7 ~.~ ~.6 1.4 '4.1'" ~3.4 ~.0 ~.0 ! ,9 ~,6 ~-~6_ _ 1.4 ~.3.,~. b.O ~.0 L,O '~.0 +4.3 ]~.5 ls,9 ~.a,e +4,6 ~,a 'a,a ...~,a.! +4,.6 ~,0 ~.,9 I.,1 ],6 +4,3_ ~,3' +4,3 ~16 ~,4 ~,9 -~,3 ~,1, i,9 ,1 ~3,5 +6,7 1~.6 14,0. '.15,8 +6,1 '~3',9 .+4,1 +6,8 ~7,3 g.6 t3,6 1,7 b,e ~9,1 ~,3 ~9,4 +4,8 ~,4 ~,e ~311 ~,4 1 ,9 ~,9~r~"7'1 B,9 ]0,4.]3,3.~.!1,8 +4.6.,~.1 ~,8 14,9~8,0 ]4,8 +4,8 ~,8 ~,8 I.,;:) b,L~,3 ~,e +4.4 +$.4 +4,1 ~,6 ~,3 '~,4 ]5,0'~"~ 14.4 '~,0 '~,0 1,5 1,8 ~,3 '~.1 ~,9 +6,1 '5,0 '"3,1 ~,E ~3,0 ~.5 '~,3 +4,4 '~,0 '~,0 19,1 +4,0 1,4 ~,7 '5,0 +6,2 '5.8 +4.6 ~.7 +4,6 *3,5 %.5 ~5,;:' +4.0 '~,7 ~,3 +4,0 '7.1 '5,6 ~,5 '~,8 ~1,9 ~5,0 14.3 ~17,9 11.0 +4.0 ~.5 +4.8 11.8 le.a 14.8 ~5,1 ~.3 ~.4 +4,5 +6.8 ~7.0 ~,5 ~3,0 b,O +6.0 18.~,~.4 11.8 ~.7 b.4 ~,5 11.7 ~,,~,17.9 +6.1 b.7 ~,7 5.6 ~6,3 bl.8 10.6 ~.7 ],4 +4,7 '1.0,9 '1.1,6 19,5 t3,0 '1,6 ~3,3 '~,6 !1,5 ]1,0 +4,6 ],9 b,3 +6,a 3,9,8 <'~,7 "10,8 +4,8 !, ,3 ~,8 ~,6 B,I ~,P ~,6 1,5 ~,6 ~3,0 ~5,4 ~,5 b,O ~,S 1,6 +4,7 ~.6 ~9,8 '7,6 ~,9 ~_,4 ~.6 ~3,a +4.8 ~,6 a l~.a l~,a b,a 1).o ID,o 1~. b,9 *7,9 ~~~4,e 1~,1 ~,1,; 1,0 1,4 +4,6 ;+4,1~ ].,1 ~,P~ ~,~7 ~,4 '~5;~5~1 ~,7 '"~,e 1,a 1,5 B,1 ;~ ~ - ~,o ~,o . ~. . .. ~.o 3.0.~ ~.~ ~.~ ~.~ ~.o ~.o ~.o 3.o ~.o ~.o ~.o~-~'/~.o ~.o ~.o .~., ~.~ ~.o ~.o ~.o ~.o ~o ~.o ~.o 3.o g.o ~.o 3.o'~ ~.o ~.o ~.o ~.~ ~.o g.o ~.o ~.o ~.o ~.o ~.o 3.o ~.o ~.o ~.o .... ~ ~,o 3,o ~,o ~.o ~,o ~,o ~.o 3.o~,o ~,o ~,o ~.~ ~.o ~.o 3.o ~.o ~.o ~.a ~.o ~.o~.o ~.o ~.o - ~.o g.o ~.o ~.o ~.o ~.o ~.o ~.o ~.og.o ~.o ~.o-~.o ~.o ~.o ~.o ~.o ~.o ~.o ~.o ~.o g.o ~.o ~.o'':~,o~.o 3.o - 3.o ~.o 3.o ~.o ~.o g.o ~.o ~.o ~.o ~.o. ~.o ~.o ~.o 'b.o b.o "O,o "O.o 10,o t),o 19,0 13,o 't),o ID,O b,1 't),l ~,1 '0,1 ~,1 b,1 b.1 't),l b,1 13,1 1 "0,0 ID,O *D,O 13,0 't),O 1].0 t).O '0,0 "0,0 ID.O 'tl,O b,O qD,O b,O b,O 10,0 'b. N LSITE PI.AN FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS INTFNDED USE- Ideal for use in car lots, street lighting or parking areas. CONSTRUCTION - Rugged, .063" thick, aluminum rectilinear housing. Continuously seam welded for weather-tight seal and integrity. Natu- rally anodized, extruded, aluminum door frame with mitered corners is retained with (two),188" diameter hinge pins and secured with (one) quarter-turn, quick release fastener. Weatherproof seal between housing and door frame is accomplished with an integrally designed, extruded silicone gasket that snaps into door frame. FINISH - Standard finish is dark bronze (DDB) polyester powder. Other powder architectural colors available. OPTICAL SYSTEM - Reflectors are anodized and segmented for superior uniformity and control, which allows the flexibility to mix distributions without compromising the overall lighting job. Reflectors attach with tool-less fasteners and are rotatable and interchangeable. Five cutoff distributions available: Type II (roadway), Type III (asymmetric), Type IV (forward throw, sharp cutoff), Type IV (wide, forward throw), and Type V (square symmetrical). Lens is .125" thick, impact-resistant, tempered, glass with thermally- applied, silk screened power door shield. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM - Constant-wattage autotransformer is 100% cop- per wound and factory tested. Removable power door and positive- locking disconnect plug. Porcelain, horizontally-oriented, mogul- base socket with copper alloy, nickel plated screw shell and center contact. UL listed 1500W- 600V, 4KV pulse rated. INSTALLATION - Extruded, 4" aluminum arm for pole or wall mounting is shipped in fixture carton. Optional mountings available. LISTING - UL listed for wet locations. Listed and labeled to comply with Canadian Standards (see Options). ITyp~ Area Lighting KSF2 HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM 250W, 400W 25' to 35' Mounting Specifications ,,, EPA: 2.0 ft.2 (.25m2) (includes arm) Length: 25 -5/16 (64.3) Width: 18-1/2 (47.0) Depth: 8-5/16 (21.1) Weight: 55 lbs (24.9kg) Arm: 4 (10.2) - L All dimensions areinches (centimeters) unless otherwise specified. Mounting Option Drilling Tem.alate6 SPxx, RPxx, DA12P 5 WBxx, DA12WB 6 WWxx 7 ORDERING INFORMATION Choose the boldface catalog nomenclature that best suits your needs and write it on the appropriate line. Order accessories as separate catalog number. Example' KSF2 400S R3 120 SP04 SF DDB LPI 1 Series KSF2 200S KSF2 250S KSF2 400S Distribution R2 lES Type II roadway R3 lES Type III asymmetric R4SC lES Type IV forward throw, sharp cutoff R4W lES Type IV wide, forward throw RSS IESTypeV square 120 208~ 240~ 277 480~ TB2 NOTES: 1 Consult factory for availability in Canada. 2 Optional multi-tap ballast (120, 208, 240, ;~77V). {120, 277, 347V in Canada). 3 SP09, RP09, or WW09 must be used when two or more lurninaires are oriented on a 90° drilling pattern. 4 May be ordered as accessory. 5 Additional architectural colors available; see Ar~ chitectural Colors brochure. 6 For arm mounting, see technical data section in Outdoor binder for drilling template. SP04 Square pole (4" arm) (standard)3 SP09 Square pole (9" arm) RP04 Round pole (4" arm)3 RPO9 Round pole (9" arm) WW04 Wood pole or wall (4" arm)3 WW09 Wood pole or wall (9" arm) WB04 Wall bracket (4" arm) WB09 Wall bracket (9" arm) UARM When ordering KMA, DA12 OPTIONAL MOUNTING (shipped separately) DA12P Degree arm (pole) DA!2WB Degree arm (wall) KMA Mast arm adapter KTMB Twin mounting bar Options Shipped Installed In Fixture SF Single fuse (120, 277, 347V, n/a TB) DF Double fuse (208, 240, 480V, n/a TB) LPI Lamp included as standard L/LP Less lamp PER NEMA twist-lock receptacle only (no photocontrol) QRS Quartz restrike system (75W max; lamp not included,120V only) £C Emergency circuit CR Enhanced corrosion resistance CSA Listed and labeled to comply with Canadian Standards Shipped separately4 PE1 NEMA twist-lock PE (120, 208, 240V) PE3 NEMA twist-lock PE (347V) PE4 NEMA twist-lock PE (480V) PE7 NEMA twist-lock PE (277V) SC Shorting cap for PER option KSFZHS House side shield (R2,R3) KSF2VG Vandal guard Architectural Colors (powder finish)5 Standard Colors DDB Dark bronze (standard) DWH White DBL Black Classic Colors DMB Medium bronze DNA Natural aluminum DSS Sandstone DGC Charcoal gray DTG Tennis green DBR Bright red DSB Steel blue Accessories: Tenon Mounting Slipfitter (Order sep'arately)' Number of fixtures Tenor, 0.D One Two@180° fwo(C~'90~3 Ti~ree@i200 Three'~90°3 F°ur~'90°'~ 2-3/8: T20-190 T20-280 T20-290 T20-320 T20-390 T20-490 2-7/8" T25-190 T25-280 T25-290 T25-320 T25-390 '1'25-490 4" T35-190 T35-280 T35-290 T35-320 T35-390 T35-490 OUTDOOR $i;eet #: KSF2-S AL-340 SObrTH ELEVAT~N 19Y-~ UNIT D EAST ELEVATION N 0 R~H EL E'v'ATtO N 55::¢r' UN,~ ~ W E ST E L EVA~ ON