HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplicationCITY OF CARMEL- CLAY TOWNSHIP
HAMILTON COUNTY, INDIANA
APPLICATION FOR BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ACTION
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE REQUEST
FEE: $655.00 for the first plus $72.50 for each additional section of the ordinance being varied.
DOCKET NO.
1)
2)
DATE RECEIVED:
Project Name: ~¢~Tcz_Ky ¢E~¢~ 6~r~-/o i Z~c=5~¢51~¢/~h°ne:
Engineer/Architect: ~> ¢ ~ ~'¢0'~ ¢
'35o-- 5'7Z- Z l~ I
Attorney:
Phone:
3)
Applicant's Status: (Check the appropriate response)
(a) The applicant's name is on the deed to the property
(b) The applicant is the contract purchaser of the property
(c) Other: ~_.
4)
If Item 3) (c)is checked, please complete the following:
Owner of the property involved: '~)/~'Tj~ I¢-.,.~ i~.
Owner's address' /_~0 ~0(,-,~'-~.~ ~-b, ~/~1~4~4~
5)
6)
Record of Ownership:
Deed Book No./Instrument No.
Page: Purchase date:
Common address of the property involved' I ~
Legal description' .~ £Z¢'- /~'~/~ ~ 1--~ ~ 1~
Tax Map Parcel No.:
7)
State explanation of requested Development Standards Variance: (State what you want to do and cite the section
number(s) of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance that applies and/or creates the need for this request).
Page 1 of 8 - z:\shared\forms\BZA applications\ Development Standards Variance Application rev. 02/04/2003
8)
State reasons supporting the Development Standards Variance: (Additionally, complete the attached question
sheet entitled "Findings of Fact-Development Standards Variance").
9)
10)
11)
12)
13)
14)
Present zoning of the property (give exact classification):
Size of lot/parcel in question' (__~. '~} ~ ,~~'$
Present use of the property: ~(¢r"~--~-~c~'-/ F'~t ~'~
Describe the proposed use of the property: ~ O:; r_ ~.
acres
Is the property: Owner occupied
Renter occupied
Other
Are there any restrictions, laws, covenants, variances, special uses, or appeals filed in connection with this
property that would relate or affect its use for the specific purpose of this application? If yes, give date and docket
number, decision rendered and pertinent explanation.
15)
16)
Has work for which this application is being filed already started? If answer is yes, give details:
Building Permit Number: /~,-'~ ~/~
Builder: ~3/~
If proposed appeal is granted, when will the work commence?
17)
If the proposed variance is granted, who will operate and/or use the proposed improvement for which this
application has been filed?
NOTE'
LEGAL NOTICE shall be published in the Indianapolis Star a MANDATORY twenty-five (25) days prior to the public
hearing date. The certified "Proof of Publication" affidavit for the newspaper must be available for inspection the night of
the hearing.
LEGAL NOTICE to all adjoining and abutting property owners is also MANDATORY, two methods of notice are
recommended'
1) CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED sent to adjoining property owners. (The white receipt
Page 2 of 8 - z:\shared\forms\BZA applications\ Development Standards Variance Application rev. 02/04/2003
should be stamped by the Post Office at least twenty-five (25) days prior to the public hearing date.)
2) HAND DELIVERED to adjoining and abutting property owners (A receipt signed by the adjoining and abutting
property owner acknowledging the twenty-five (25) day notice should be kept for verification that the notice was
completed)
REALIZE THE BURDEN OF PROOF FOR ALL NOTICES IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT. AGAIN, THIS
TASK MUST BE COMPLETED AT LEAST TWENTY-FIVE (25) DAYS PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARING DATE.
The applicant understands that docket numbers will not be assigned until all supporting information has been
submitted to the Department of Community Services.
The applicant certifies by signing this application that he/she has been advised that all representations of the
Department of Community Services are advisory only and that the applicant should rely on appropriate subdivision and
zoning ordinance and/or the legal advice of his/her attorney.
I, ., Auditor of Hamilton County, Indiana, certify that the attached
(Please Print)
affidavit is a true and complete listing of the adjoining and adjacent property owners of the property described herewith.
OWNER
ADDRESS
Auditor of Hamilton County, Indiana--Signature
Date
Page 3 of 8 - z:\shared\forms\BZA applications\ Development Standards Variance Application rev. 02~04/2003
AFFIDAVIT
LESSEE
, c ..... r~ .....ct., ......... of property involved in this application and that the foregoing
I hereby swear that I am the "-" ~"""~ ...... ~'
signatures, statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and
correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I, the undersigned, authorize the applicant to act on my behalf with regard
to this application and subsequent headngs and testimony.
Signed:
( ' ' -" ' Date
(Please Print)
STATE OF ~ KENTUCKY
SS:
County of
(County in which notarization takes place)
Before me the undersigned, a Notary Public
(Notary Public's county of residence)
LESSEE
/Y day of /~.~ ~ ~'
_ County, State o~~3~monally appeared
and acknowledge the execution of the foregoing instrument this
.,20 Oy
L_..~~ublic~igna~
Notary Public-Please Print
My commission expires:
......
Page 4 of 8 - z:~harecl~forms~BZA mpplicatiormt Development 8tanclarc~ Varimoe Application rev. 02/04/2003
FINDINGS OF FACT- DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE
~1 ' The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety,
? ....... morals, and general welfare of the community because:
a) (Blade Signage)' ...since two (2) wall signs are permitted at 30 square feet
each, the two (2) requested blade signs at 12.5 square feet each will not be
injurious to the public or will negatively affect the general welfare of the
community.
b) (Menuboard)' ...a sixteen (16) square foot menuboard will not allow the
consumer to make their selection from KFC and Long John Silver's complete
menu. The general public will benefit if the menuboard variance were
approved.
c) (Building and Parking Setback): ...the location of the building and parking
was a request of the City Planning Department. The Planning Department is
proposing that all new buildings in this area be placed at the requested
distance from the street.
d) (Rear Setback)' ...the parking for the existing Kentucky Fried Chicken is set
back 0' from the rear property line. The proposed parking is set back 10'
from the property line. This will be an added benefit to the general welfare
of the community.
e) (Signage Setback)' ... the monument sign will not be in the right-of-way and
the sign will be no closer to the street than other buildings constructed
under the impending ordinance.
2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance
will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because:
a) (Blade Signage)' ...the blade signage is not impeding, is not garish, and fits
well with the bUilding architecture. Additionally, the existing use of the site
is an operating KFC restaurant, which has a large pole sign and building
sign.
b) (Menuboard)' ...the menuboard is an integral part of this operation and the
existing KFC has been in operation for many years with a menuboard. The
menuboard is designed so that the consumer has the option to order items
that the restaurant offers. The menu boards have been upgraded to match
the architecture of the building.
c) (Building and Parking Setback)' ...all new buildings will be required to be
placed at the proposed location.
d) (Rear Setback): ...the rear setback will be increased from its current offset of
0 feet. Any added setback will not affect the value of the adjacent property
in a substantially adverse manner.
e) (Signage Setback)' ...the monument sign was designed to match the
architecture of the building and is smaller than the existing signage.
3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will
result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because:
a) (Blade Si§nage): ...our request to allow blade signage on the front fa(~ade of
the building came about when the City requested that the building be
placed as close to the roadway as possible. By relocating the building, the
front signs on the building are not visible until a consumer drives past the
building. Since QSRs depend on impulse sales, wall signage must be in a
line of sight.
b) (Menuboards): ...Kentucky Fried Chicken and Long John Silver's Restaurant
are established restaurants that operate throughout the Untied States. As
such, marketing research has been conducted and a menu board established
that maximizes ease of perusal, expediency with the drive-thru experience,
and product sales. All of the preceding are factors contributing to customer
satisfaction and profitability. Compliance with all of the provisions of the
City of Carmel' Sign Ordinance will require Kentucky Fried Chicken and
Long John Silver's to custom order a menu board adding substantial cost and
inconvenience. Furthermore, the custom-built menu board will be untested
in providing adequate marketing and user friendliness. There are significant
practical operating and marketing difficulties with a drive thru menu board
smaller than the board request. On such a board, Kentucky Fried Chicken
and Long John Silver's would have difficulty displaying the entire core
menu, and making changes in the menu would require customized letters
and numbers. Inability to display the core menu significantly hampers the
restaurants ability to operate successfully. Approximately on-third to one-
half of the projected sales at this location are expected to come through the
drive-thru window. The industry norm is that customers be able to see an
example of the food they are ordering. Thus, the menu board is core to the
marketing and ordering of the food
c) (Building and Parking Setback): ...the City's direction was that all buildings
should be placed as close to the street right of way as possible. We are
applying for this variance per the City's direction.
d) (Rear Setback): ...the lot size too small to allow for a 30' greenbelt.
Currently no greenbelt exists and the proposed site is increasing the
greenbelt from O' to 10'.
e) (Signage Setback): ...since the building will be so close to the right-of-way,
the monument sign needs to be moved as close as possible to the right-of-
way line, so that it is visible from the street. This sign will be no closer to
the street than other buildings constructed under the impending ordinance.
Given the context of the area and surrounding uses, this proposed signage is reasonable and
appropriate. In this particular circumstance, as demonstrated above, the weight of the
evidence strongly favors granting each of the requested variances. Kentucky Fried Chicken
and Long John Silver's respectfully request that each variance be granted.
CITY OF CARMEL- CLAY TOWNSHIP
HAMILTON COUNTY~ INDIANA
APPLICATION FOR BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ACTION
DO'CS
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE REQUEST
FEE' $655.00 for the first plus $72.50 for each additional section of the ordinance being varied.
DOCKET NO.
1)
2)
DATE RECEIVED:
Applicant:
Address: ~ ~O
Project Name: i~,~.'""~To(..~,,,,f
Engineer/Architect:
Attorney:
Phone'
Phone: ~%ID -- ~'- 7 Z :Z. I O fO
Phone:
3)
Applicant's Status: (Check the appropriate response)
~- (a) The applicant's name is on the deed to the property
4)
~ (b) The a p plican~,~ thee.. ,o$c°ntrac-t~'F-.~ ¢~ p.u rchaser~.T, c'¢ of~ th,~..property
~ (c) Other: ,./.,o~L,, "~c,v~J 5, ll..~Jgi'z-.S
If Item 3) (c)is checked, please complete the following'
Owner of the property involved'
Owner's address' ('¢0 ~¢-O C~c-"/z..~ TE-~ 0_/k~£/-- /~3
· / /
Phone: -~i 7' ¢ ~1 (.,¢' O) 5- ~ I
5)
6)
7)
Record of Ownership:
Deed Book No./Instrument No.
Page: Purchase date'
Common address of the property involved: I -~--~
Legal description' .:~ ~"' /~T'r'Ac. 1'~ ~ ~
Tax Map Parcel No.'
State explanation of requested Development Standards Variance: (State what you want to do and cite the section
number(s) of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance that applies and/or creates the need for this request).
, %-~STA/~L uo~cC ~i~A~ 4- A ,¢40~o~-/a'T- .5~~- Z5",07,07-c~
Page 1 of 8 - z:\shared\forms\BZA applications\ Development Standards Variance Application rev. 02/04/2003
8)
State reasons supporting the Development Standards Variance: (Additionally, complete the attached question
sheet entitled "Findings of Fact-Development Standards Variance").
9)
10)
11)
12)
Present zoning of the property (give exact classification)'
Size of lot/parcel in question: 0 · -'~ I -~ p~o¢~
Present use of the property: i'~-~ ~~O I'''- Y
Describe the proposed use of the property: ('--~.o', ~_ ~
acres
13)
14)
Is the property: Owner occupied
Renter occupied X
Other
Are there any restrictions, laws, covenants, variances, special uses, or appeals filed in connection with this
property that would relate or affect its use for the specific purpose of this application? If yes, give date and docket
number, decision rendered and pertinent explanation.
15)
16)
Has work for which this application is being filed already started? If answer is yes, give details'
Building Permit Number: ~ !/~
Builder: ~/~ / ~
If proposed appeal is granted, when will the work commence?
17)
If the proposed variance is granted, who will operate and/or use the proposed improvement for which this
application has been filed?
NOTE:
LEGAL NOTICE shall be published in the Indianapolis Star a MANDATORY twenty-five (25) days prior to the public
hearing date. The certified "Proof of Publication" affidavit for the newspaper must be available for inspection the night of
the hearing. ,
LEGAL NOTICE to all adjoining and abutting property owners is also MANDATORY, two methods of notice are
recommended'
1) CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED sent to adjoining property owners. (The white receipt
Page 2 of 8 - z:\shared\forms\BZA applications\ Development Standards Variance Application rev. 02~04~2003
should be stamped by the Post Office at least twenty-five (25) days prior to the public hearing date.)
2) HAND DELIVERED to adjoining and abutting property owners (A receipt signed by the adjoining and abutting
property owner acknowledging the twenty-five (25) day notice should be kept for verification that the notice was
completed)
REALIZE THE BURDEN OF PROOF FOR ALL NOTICES IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT. AGAIN, THIS
TASK MUST BE COMPLETED AT LEAST TWENTY-FIVE (25) DAYS PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARING DATE.
The applicant understands that docket numbers will not be assigned until all supporting information has been
submitted to the Department of Community Services.
The applicant certifies by signing this application that he/she has been advised that all representations of the
Department of Community Services are advisory only and that the applicant should rely on appropriate subdivision and
zoning ordinance and/or the legal advice of his/her attorney.
I, , Auditor of Hamilton County, Indiana, certify that the attached
(Please Print)
affidavit is a true and complete listing of the adjoining and adjacent property owners of the property described herewith.
OWNER
ADDRESS
Auditor of Hamilton County, Indiana--Signature
Date
Page 3 of 8 - z:\shared\forms\BZA applications\ Development Standards Variance Application rev. 02/04/2003
AFFIDAVIT
LESSEE
I, hereby swear that ! am the ¢ ............... .. ......... ~of property involved in this application and that the foregoing
signatures, statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects tree and
correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I, the undersigned, authorize the applicant to act on my behalf with regard
to this application and subsequent headngs and testimony.
Signed: ~' ~/ ....
,n .~ ~". ....... -~--- --
t, ~cp:,.~' ,.w,,=,, ,,,,,,,,,.,y, ,,,, "/"7/'T ........ ~/ Date
LESSEE
.... ii'lease Print)
STATE OF ~NDIA'NA- KENTUCKY
SS:
County of
(County inj Which notarization takes place)
Before me the undersigned, a Notary Public
for :~~ .~~, '~,~_~ o ~
'" (Notary Public's county of residenc~)
LESSEE
_ County, State o~~ersonally appeared
and acknowledge the execution of the foregoing instrument this
,,
~./N~ublic-~ignature
Notary Public-Please Print
My commission expires:
Page 4 of 8 - z:~hared~forrns~BZA applicatiorm~ Development Standardm Variance Application rev. 02/04/2003
Docket No'
Petitioner:
CARMEL/CLAY ADVISORY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
Carmel, Indiana
FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheet)
.
,
DATED THIS DAY OF 20
Board Member
Page 7 of 8 - z:\shared\forms\BZA applications\ Development Standards Variance Application rev. 02/04/2003
BU~L,9fNG BA~CK
WAJNSCO¥ ~CK
$?O~ ~ACCF~T BANg
ELF.S, P~
GALV, METAL COP~
RAIN GLrTTER
KNOX ~X PER FIRE DEPARTMENT
COMPOSITE ROOF ,Si'TINGLES
~BOL ~EA MANUFACTtJRER COLOR ALT~NATE ~ I AL~RNATE COLOR
E~ BUYING B~CK .................. TBD ....... BR'oWN ' ' ........................ I ........
BR~K MORTAR TBD LIGHT BEIGE
BRICK MORTAR T~D UGHT BEIGE
~ PAINT TO MATCH BRICK TBD lIGHT BE)GE
..... ~ ,~,~;oi~,~-,;~ ~ .o,~ .... ,,,,,,,',,'","'"'j', ........ , ,,,,, ....... ! ..............
............................................... EX'rERIOR FIN!S,H ,SCHEDULE .............. !, E .........
...................................................................................................................... [ ........ WEST, i,i~iL,~iyATJON I!4: .:. u-o'~ I'~
CONTRACT DATE:
BJIIJ:)tfl~ TtPE:
~ ~ON: J~E
s.rrE NUMBER:
STORE NUM~: 2004087,~
KFC /
i33t $. P~NG~UNE
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS
A4.0
PLOT DATE: 08,27,04
5'"tORE ~:
KFC /L.J8
1~1 $. ~ELINE ~
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS
A4.1
EAST ELEVATION
PLOT DATE: 0827,04
PREVIEW BOARD
SIGN ~19.57 SQ. FT.
4'-2 ~ x ~
SIGN--47.3 SQ. FT.
6'-0 5/8" x 7'-9"
MENU BOARD
11'4'
.
b
BUILDING
TRASH DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE
PARCEL~
pRrlJE:CT Nfl.
ROAD~ RAN~ELI NE RI)
COUNTY~ HAHILTON
SECTIONI 3!
TOVNSH!P, ]8 N
RANGE, 4 £
EXHIBIT 'A'
RIGHT DF WAY PARCEL PLAT
rlWNER, PATRIC[A R. EMMERT REVDCABLE LIVING TRUST
INSTRUI~NT ND., 99-099]7709
RE~]RD ND.
PAGE ND.
DATED, 03-D3-1977
SHEET 1 OF 1
DRAWN~ ~. ~ H.
DATE~ 10-0~-04
CHECKED, B.G.H.
gATE,
~"~ HATCHE~I ARIA IS
..... APPEI]XI MATE TAKING
89'55'00"
45.01'
0
S 89'55'00" W
45.01'
s w COt SWl/4
si~' 31, T18N R4E
HARRISON M~'N FND.
A part oF' the Southwest Quarter oF Section $1, Township 18 North,
Range 4 East oF the Second Principal Meridian, Hamilton County, Indiana,
be/n9 a portion oF a parce( o£ land as described in Instrument Number
99-09917709 In the 0££/ce oF the Recorder oF Hamilton County, Indiana,
~ore particularly described as Follo~5,
Co~mencfn9 at the Southwest corner oF' the Southwest Ouarter oF
Sect/on 3I, fownst~'p 18 North, Range 4 East~ thence 81 degrees 84
minutes 45 ~econd~ Vest, along fha west tine oF said Southwest
Ouar ten 1063.8~ ~eet to the point o~ begigning of this d~criptlon, said
point being (he southwest corner oF said parceO the~e North I
degree D4 minutes 45 seco~s Vest, a(ono the west line oF said
~uerter SectOr, lSO. O~ Peet to fha norfhe~5t corner o~ 5oid portal)
~h~nce North B9 degrees ~ ~inufe5 DB ~econd5 Eest, along the north
tine o~ ~otd percel, 4~ ~eet/ fhence Soufh ~ degree ~4 ~inufe5 45
~econds Ees~, poroRel wifh the ~es~ fine oF sold ~uorter Secfion ~.~
Fee f ~o fhe south line o~ 5eid p~rcell thence Sou~h B9 degnee5 55
~tnufes 8~ seconds Vest, otong the 5oufh line oF weld perce6 ~ ~eet
to the point o~ beg~ng confo/~ng ~.155 ecre5 (67~ squ~re ~eet)
~one or (egg.
CARMEL/CLAY ADVISORY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
CARMEL, INDIANA
Docket No.'
Petitioner:
FINDINGS OF FACT- DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE
The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the
community because'
,
The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a
substantially adverse manner because:
The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the
use of the property because:
DECISION
IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Development Standards Variance
Docket No. is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this
Board, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof.
Adopted this day of ..... 20
CHAIRPERSON, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals
SECRETARY, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals
Conditions of the Board are listed on the back. (Petitioner or his representative to sign).
Z:\shared\forms\BZA applications\devstandapp
Revised 02/04/2003
Page 8 of 8 - z:\shared\forms\BZA applications\ Development Standards Variance Application rev. 02/04/2003
FINDINGS OF FACT- DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE
1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety,
morals, and general welfare of the community because:
a) (Building and Parking Setback)- The location of the building and parking was
a request of the City Planning Department. The Planning Department is
proposing that all new buildings in this area be placed at the requested
distance from the street.
b) (Wall Signage)' Since two (2) wall signs are permitted at 30 square feet each,
the separation of the two, 30 sf signs into four (4) fifteen square foot signs
will not be injurious to the public or will negatively affect the general
welfare of the community.
c) (Menuboard)' A sixteen (16) square foot menuboard will not allow the
consumer to make their selection from KFC and Long John Silver's complete
menu. The general public will benefit if the menuboard variance were
approved.
2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance
will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because:
a) (Building and Parking Setback)' ...all new buildings will be required to be
placed at the proposed location.
b) (Wall Signage)' ...the wall signage is not impeding, is not garish, and fits
well with the building architecture. Additionally, the existing use of the site
is an operating KFC restaurant.
c) (Menuboard)' ...the menuboard is an integral part of this operation and the
existing KFC has been in operation for many years with a menuboard. The
menuboard is designed so that the consumer has the option to order items
that the restaurant offers.
3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will
result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because:
a) (Building and Parking Setback)' ...the City's direction was that all buildings
should be placed as close to the street right of way as possible. We are
applying for this variance per the City's direction.
b) (Wall Si§nage)' ...our request to allow signage on the side facades of the
building came about when the City requested that the building be placed as
close to the roadway as possible. By relocating the building, the front signs
on the building are not visible until a consumer drives past the building.
Since QSRs depend on impulse sales, wall signage must be in a line of sight.
Additionally, the trend to utilize two (2) restaurants makes it necessary to
have two signs on each of the two side facades.
c) (Menuboard)' Kentucky Fried Chicken and Long John Silver's Restaurant are
established restaurants that operate throughout the Untied States. As such,
marketing research has been conducted and a menu board established that
maximizes ease of perusal, expediency with the drive-thru experience, and
product sales. All of the preceding are factors contributing to customer
satisfaction and profitability. Compliance with all of the provisions of the
City of Carmel' Sign Ordinance will require Kentucky Fried Chicken and
Long John Silver's to custom order a menu board adding substantial cost and
inconvenience. Furthermore, the custom-built menu board will be untested
in providing adequate marketing and user friendliness. There are significant
practical operating and marketing difficulties with a drive thru menu board
smaller than the board request. On such a board, Kentucky Fried Chicken
and Long John Silver's would have difficulty displaying the entire core
menu, and making changes in the menu would require customized letters
and numbers. Inability to display the core menu significantly hampers the
restaurants ability to operate successfully. Approximately on-third to one-
half of the projected sales at this location are expected to come through the
drive-thru window. The industry norm is that customers be able to see an
example of the food they are ordering. Thus, the menu board is core to the
marketing and ordering of the food
Given the context of the area and surrounding uses, this proposed signage is reasonable and
appropriate. In this particular circumstance, as demonstrated above, the weight of the
evidence strongly favors granting each of the requested variances. Kentucky Fried Chicken
and Long John Silver's respectfully request that each variance be granted.
2'-t i 11t16
///-- 31/2' o.D. PIPE
.7.16 WNJ.~
/- 33/4' R
/
DESIGN PARAM~:
· i10 mph wind speed 3.second gum-Exposure C.
· 300 PSi: per foot of depth ai~wabte lateral soil beadng pressure.
· Compliant wit~ bulldog codes and standards
(IBC, UBC, BOCA, AISC, ~CE 7,/~l & Aluminum Design Man,at)
· Refer to wdtten ~entation for material
MBll.-D7 - DF KF~ OI~CTIO~L CABINET
· Extmd~ aluminum frame, 4 1/2' deep with
· Aiumin~ painted fillem
- .1t8 Pan fo~med SG ~rbonate
· Approximate weight: 80 lbs.
Lamps: i2.) F421'I2HO/CW
Ballasl: (i} 2 Lamp electronic ballast (1.1 amps ea~)
Amp Load: i.i am~,/120 volts
Circuits: (i) 20 amp ci~ 60 HZ - UL 48 & NE(::; compliant
TOTAL LOAI): 1,1 ~, (1| 26 ~ circuits 60 HZ
lp. ~111CIJ, YO.
i,~ 03N& REtZ'D,
L
7675 13AK RtOS£ HIGHWAY ' I(i',iI3XViLL£, TF..NNF..S~i££ 39731 · VmC£: 665,342.8333 · FAX: 86,5,539.2810 · WWW.TRISECT£NGiN££1:IING,CI3N
Roads
--~ Interstate
~ US Highway
~ State Road
---- Major Roads
Minor Roads
............. Subdivision Roads
............. New Subdivision Roads
Private Road or Drive
~i Parcels 07~2004
~ Color Ortho Photo 2003
Corporation Boundary
200 0
SCALE I :3,994
200 400
FEET
6OO
N
Roads
----- Interstate
~ US Highway
~ State Road
Major Roads
Minor Roads
.............. Subdivision Roads
............... New Subdivision Roads
Private Road or Drive
i i Parcels 07~2004
Zoning
[~'" E~] carmel clay zoning
B-1
B-2
B-3
B-6
I-I
SCALE I ' 4,241
2oo 0 2o0 4oo
FEET
600
N