HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings of FactJhN-12-2004 MON 0I:i7 PM ebRO]EL OOMMUNITY SVOS FA× NO, 317 571 2426
?, 08
FINDINGg OF FACT FORM FOR
PRIMARV PI,AT CONSIDERATION
Carmel Plan commission
Cmmel, Indiana
DOCICETNO.04020033 PP NA/ViE OF SUBDIVISION: Bennett Minor Subdivision
PETITIONER: Dr. Richard Bennett
Based upon all the evidence pruent~ by the p~tltion~r an4 upon ghe repr~entatlons and
certifications of the ~taff of the Department of Community Development, I determine that the plat
complle~ with standards of the Car~l Clay Subdivision Control Ordinance.
__ I hereby n.n.m-nv,~ nf the primary plat as submit(ed with the following specific conditions ~ agreed to
by the petitioner.
Cond/~ion 1,
Condition 2.
Cond/tion 3.
.,, I hereby dl~ap?~Yt of the prln~ry plat ~s iubmitted for the following reasons:
Docket No:
Petitioner:
CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION
Carmel, Indiana
SUBDMSION WAIVER
FINDINGS OF FACT
#04030010 SW
Dr. Richard Bennett
Section. Varied: SCO 6.05.01
BriefDcscriptionofVahance: lots shall abut/have access to a street
In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of a variance,
the Plan Commission should consider the following:
The grant ora variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general
welfare of the community.
The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be
affected in a substantially adverse manner.
The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such
condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood.
The slzict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an unusual
and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is sought.
The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the Comprehensive Plan.
Based on all the evidence presented by the petitioner, I approve of the requested
subdivision variance.
I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons:
Dated this ~ day of ~ 1~
,200~[_.
Z:Xshared~fonnsq'C applicationkSubdivision Waiver Findings-of-Fact 2000,01 [ 1 rev. 01/05/04
CAR34EL/CLAY PLA/~I COMMISSION
Carmel, Indiana
SUBDIVISION W33[VER
FI1NDINGS OF FACT
DocketNo: #0403001 1 SW
Petitioner: Dr. Richard Bennett
Section Varied: SCO 6.0 5.01
BriefDescriptionofVariance: lots shall have a minimum of 50-ft frontage
In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of a variance,
the Plan Connn/ssion should consider the following:
/'he grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general
welfare of the community.
The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be
affected in a substantially adverse manner.
The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such
condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood.
The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an unusual
and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the vahance is sought.
The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially wSth the Comprehensive Plan.
Based on all the exhdence presented by the petitioner, I approve of the requested
subdivision vahance.
I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons:
Dated this
day of ~ ~'~
Z:%hared~fo~ms~PC application~Subdivision Waiver Findings-of-Fact 2000.0111
rev. 01/05/04