HomeMy WebLinkAboutPulte Motion to Define Scope of Director's Authority (2)LEGAL COUN' 1. 1
December 7, 2011
Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals
c/o Mr. Michael P. Hollibaugh
1 Civic Square
Carmel, IN 46032
Dear Mike:
TEO:dlp
Enclosures
ILERLLP
RE: In the Matter of the Appeal Regarding The Traditions on the
Monon October 18, 2011 Determination by Director of
Community Services of the City of Carmel
Pulte Homes, Inc.'s Motion to Define Scope of Director's Authority;
Timothy Ochs
One American Square 1 Suite 2900 1 Indianapolis, IN 46282 -0200 1 P 317 -236 -2100 1 F 317 236 -2219
INDIANAPOLIS 1 CHICAGO 1 CLEVELAND 1 COLUMBUS 1 DUPAGE COUNTY IL 1 WASHINGTON DC
WRITER's DIRECT NUMBER: (317) 236 -5952
❑u ECr FAX: (317) 592 -4720
INTERNET: Timothy.Ochs icemiller.com
4
EcErvEo
JAN 24 2012
aoc$
Enclosed for fling with the Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals, please find the original
copies of the following documents:
Pulte Homes, Inc.'s Brief in Support of Motion to Define Scope of Director's
Authority; and
proposed Order Granting Pulte Homes, Inc.'s Motion to Define Scope of
Director's Authority
If you have any questions regarding these documents, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
ICE MILLER LLP
www.icemiller.com
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL
REGARDING THE TRADITIONS ON
THE MONON OCTOBER 18, 2011
DETERMINATION BY DIRECTOR OF
COMMUNITY SERVICES OF THE
CITY OF CARMEL
PULTE HOMES, INC.'S MOTION TO DEFINE SCOPE OF
DIRECTOR'S AUTHORITY
Pulte Homes, Inc. "Pulte respectfully requests that the Board of Zoning Appeals find
that the Director of the Department of Community Services exceeded his authority in Sections
2(A) -(C); 4(B) -(D); and 5(A)-(C) of his October 18, 2011 Determination. Pulte further requests
that the Board find that any alleged violation of a non zoning ordinance is not properly before
the Board. Pulte also respectfully requests that the Board find that the Director has no authority
to enter a zoning -based determination on the issues raised in the November 14, 2011 appeal filed
by the Traditions on the Monon Homeowners Association, and non zoning issues raised by the
Homeowners Association are not properly before the Board. In support of this Motion, Pulte
tenders herewith its Brief in Support of its Motion to Define Scope of Director's Authority.
1/2735504.1
CARMEL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
Respectfully submitted,
ICE MILLER LLP
Timothy E. #16823 -02)
Attorney for Pulte Homes of Indiana, LLC
R EC iVEO
JAN 2 4 2012
DOCS
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL
REGARDING THE TRADITIONS ON
THE MONON OCTOBER 18, 2011
DETERMINATION BY DIRECTOR OF
COMMUNITY SERVICES OF THE
CITY OF CARMEL
CARMEL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
4
CFJVEO
JAN z a 1011
DOc8
PULTE HOMES, INC.'S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF
MOTION TO DEFINE SCOPE OF DIRECTOR'S AUTHORITY
I. INTRODUCTION
The Director of the Department of Community Services is obligated to enforce and
administer the PUD Ordinance for Traditions on the Monon and the portions of the Carmel /Clay
Zoning Ordinance that are specifically referenced in the PUD Ordinance. (PUD Ordinance
1.2). The Director does not, however, have authority to impose additional obligations on Pulte
or create ad hoc rules that apply to Pulte. Pulte is appealing only those matters for which the
Director has exceeded his authority.
Moreover, the Board is only empowered to hear disputes regarding the City of Carmel
Zoning Ordinance. To the extent the Director based his findings on non zoning ordinances, the
Board is without jurisdiction to hear such a dispute. Resolution of these threshold issues will
significantly streamline the hearing on February 27, 2012.
II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
On December 21, 2004, the Common Council for the City of Carmel "City Council
enacted a Planned Unit Development District Ordinance for Traditions on the Monon "PUD
Pulte Is Appealing
Pulte is Not Appealing
2(A) -(C): Streets and Curbs
1(A) -(C): Banked Parking Area
4(B) -(D): Foundation Landscaping; Common
Area; Tree Mulch
3(A) -(F): Landscaping and Grounds
5(A) -(C) Irrigation
4(A); (4)(E): Driveway Plantings; Mulch bed
restoration.
Ordinance The PUD Ordinance allowed the Developer, Buckingham Properties, Inc., and its
successors to develop a townhome community located near 136 Street and Rangeline Road.
Centex Homes "Centex became a successor to Buckingham Properties, Inc., and developed
the Traditions on the Monon. Pulte Group, Inc. "Pulte purchased Centex Homes.
In recent months, the Homeowners Association of the Traditions on the Monon
"Homeowners Association has complained to Pulte and the Director about a variety of
matters. Pulte addressed many of these concerns, but the parties could not resolve the
Homeowners Association's complaints regarding several issues, including landscaping
maintenance, irrigation, and street and curb layout.
On October 18, 2011, the Director issued his determination "Determination regarding
these lingering issues. Both Pulte and the Homeowners Association timely filed appeals to the
BZA. Pulte has appealed only those matters for which it believes the Director has exceeded his
authority. Pulte is not appealing several items in the Determination either because the Director
did not impose additional obligations on Pulte, or because Pulte has already agreed to correct
those items. A summary is below.
The hearing on these appeals is scheduled for February 27, 2012. As discussed in detail
below, Pulte seeks a determination on the threshold issue of whether the Director exceeded his
authority in Sections 2(A) -(C); 4(B) -(D); and 5(A) -(C) of the Determination. Resolution of this
issue will streamline the proceedings on February 27, 2012.
III. ARGUMENT
1. The Director is authorized to enforce the PUD, but he is not empowered to impose
new obligations on Pulte.
The City Council is vested with the authority to enact zoning ordinances. In doing so, the
City Council has wide discretion in drafting the ordinance. Once the ordinance is enacted,
however, legislative discretion ends and the ordinance can only be enforced by the Director as a
ministerial act. See Carmel Zoning Ordinance 29.04.01 (it shall be the duty of the Director to
administer and enforce this Ordinance); see also Hendricks County Board of Commissioners v
Rieth- Reilly Construction Co., Inc., 868 N.E.2d 844, 854 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007) (stating that a
legislative body has discretion to enact a law, but ministerial agency cannot exercise
discretionary power typically reserved to legislative body).
Legislative discretion is reserved for the Cit y Council, and any attempt to delegate
legislative authority to the Director is improper. Id. at 853 (holding that the area plan
commission could not exercise the sort of discretion reserved to a legislative body enacting a law
or ordinance and that any attempt to delegate such broad authority would be improper). The
PUD Ordinance is the exclusive means of exercising zoning control over the Traditions on the
Monon. Ind. Code 36- 7- 4- 1504(c). Thus, the Director cannot go beyond the express written
language of the PUD Ordinance to impose additional obligations. As the Indiana Court of
Appeals has found, "[i]t is well- settled that discretion in the formulation of standards is to be
exercised when an ordinance is created, rather than when an ordinance is applied." Burrell v.
Lake County Plan Commission, 624 N.E.2d 526, 532 (Ind. Ct. App. 1994). In other words, if
3
the PUD does not require Pulte to act, the Director does not have the discretion to order Pulte to
act:
It is well settled that zoning ordinances must be precise, definite, and certain in
expression so as to enable both the landowner and the municipality to act with
assurance and authority regarding local land use decisions... This requirement is
dictated by due process considerations in that the ordinance must provide fair
warning as to what the governing body will consider in making a decision.
Hendricks County Board of Commissioners, 868 N.E.2d at 852.
In our case, Section 1.2 of the PUD Ordinance states,
Development of the District shall be governed entirely by (i) the provisions of this
Traditions on the Monon Ordinance and its exhibits, and (ii) those provisions of
the Carmel/Clay Zoning ordinance specifically referenced in this Traditions
on the Monon Ordinance. In the event of a conflict between this Traditions on
the Monon Ordinance and the Carmel /Clay Zoning Ordinance or the Sign
Ordinance, the provisions of this Traditions on the Monon Ordinance shall apply.
(emphasis added).
Thus, in making his Determination, the Director can look only to the PUD Ordinance or
those provisions of the Carmel /Clay Zoning Ordinance specifically referenced in the PUD
Ordinance.
As detailed more fully in Pulte's November 17, 2011 Appeal, the Director has ordered
Pulte to make multiple changes to streets and curbs, landscaping, mulch, and irrigation.
(emphasis added). The PUD is silent with regard to street and curb requirements. Moreover,
the PUD does not specifically incorporate any provision from the Carmel /Clay Zoning
Ordinance regarding street and curb requirements. Thus, the Director cannot look to a general
Carmel /Clay Zoning Ordinance regarding curbs to impose this obligation on Pulte. Accordingly,
the Director has no authority to impose street and curb requirements in Sections 2(A) -(C) of the
Determination.
4
Further, the PUD Ordinance provides only a cursory reference to the maintenance of
landscaping, mulch, and irrigation: "It shall be the responsibility of the owners and their agents
to insure proper maintenance of project landscaping approved in accordance with this Traditions
on the Monon Ordinance. This is to include, but is not limited to, irrigation and mulching of
planting areas, replacing dead, diseased, or overgrown plantings (PUD Ordinance 8 3
The PUD Ordinance contains no further guidance, nor does it specifically reference a part of the
Carmel /Clay Zoning Ordinance dealing with irrigation or landscaping. The Director is thus
without authority to create and impose additional irrigation and landscaping requirements. In
addition, the PUD Ordinance states that landscaping maintenance is the responsibility of owners
and their agents in this case, the Homeowners Association and their management company.
There is no basis in the PUD Ordinance to impose such an obligation on Pulte.
In this case, the Director is obligated to enforce the PUD Ordinance and those portions of
the Carmel /Clay Zoning Ordinance specifically referenced in the PUD Ordinance, but the scope
of his authority is strictly limited by those ordinances. The obligations he seeks to impose in
sections 2(A) -(C); 4(B) -(D); and 5(A)-(C) of the Determination have no basis in the PUD
Ordinance. Pulte respectfully requests that the Board find that the Director has exceeded his
authority with regard to the items Pulte has appealed.
2. The Director may have authority to enforce other parts of the Carmel City Code,
but the BZA has jurisdiction over disputes involving zoning ordinances.
The Director may contend that he has authority to order Pulte to perform this work
because some other, non zoning ordinance requires it, i.e., the non zoning portions of the Carmel
City Code. While the Director might be vested with authority to enforce some non zoning
provisions of the Carmel City Code or the Building Code, the BZA is empowered to hear appeals
5
involving only enforcement of the Zoning or Subdivision Control Ordinance of the City of
Carmel. See Carmel Zoning Ordinance 30.01; Ind. Code 36-7-4-918.1. For example, the
Carmel City Code regulates countless other activities, ranging from the traffic violations to
building code violations to the provision of water services. it would be completely inappropriate
to bring a traffic violation dispute before the BZA. The BZA is created to be the expert on
zoning ordinances nothing else. Thus, to the extent the Director contends he has authority to
order Pulte to act pursuant to a non- zoning ordinance, those matters are not properly before the
BZA. The BZA is not the correct forum to hear such disputes.
It is important to remember that ruling in Pulte's favor on this issue does not deprive the
Homeowners Association of a remedy. For example, if they believe that the landscaping has not
been maintained properly, they can file a complaint for breach of contract against the
management company engaged by the Homeowners Association to provide maintenance. The
proper forum for such a claim is state court it is not the BZA.
3. The Director is without authority to enter a determination on the issues raised in the
Homeowners Association's Appeal, and the BZA is not the proper forum to hear the
Homeowners Association's complaints.
The Homeowners Association has filed an appeal contending that the Director did not go
far enough in his Determination. Specifically, they claim that the Director should have
addressed alleged building defects, building and surface drainage problems, verification of
repairs, and the status of performance bonds issued to Pulte by the City. The PUD Ordinance is
silent with regard to these complaints, and the PUD Ordinance does not reference another part of
the Carmel /Clay Zoning Ordinance that addresses these complaints. As discussed in detail
above, the Director is thus without authority to enter a determination on these matters. Further,
the Homeowners Association's complaints involve non zoning matters; accordingly, the BZA is
not empowered to hear them.
6
IV. CONCLUSION
The Director is empowered to enforce the PUD Ordinance —not impose new obligations
on Pulte. Moreover, the Board is empowered to hear only disputes arising out of the zoning
ordinances —not claims for violations of non zoning ordinances. Pulte respectfully requests that
the Board find that the Director exceeded his authority in Sections 2(A) -(C); 4(B) -(D); and 5(A)-
(C) of the Determination, and that any alleged violation of non zoning ordinances is not properly
before the Board.
1/2732947.1
Respectfully submitted,
ICE MILLER LLP
Timothy E. S hs (#1 6823-02)
Attorney f' Pulte Homes of Indiana, LL
7
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL
REGARDING THE TRADITIONS ON
THE MONON OCTOBER 18, 2011
DETERMINATION BY DIRECTOR OF
COMMUNITY SERVICES OF THE
CITY OF CARMEL
ORDER GRANTING PULTE HOMES, INC.'S MOTION TO DEFINE
SCOPE OF DIRECTOR'S AUTHORITY
Pulte Homes, Inc., by counsel, having filed its Motion to Define Scope of Director's
Authority, and the Board, being duly advised in the premises, now finds that said Motion should
be GRANTED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED as follows:
1. The Director of the Department of Community Services exceeded his authority in
Sections 2(A) -(C); 4(B) -(D); and 5(A) -(C) of his October 18, 2011 Determination.
2. Any alleged violation of a non zoning ordinance is not properly before this Board.
3. The Director has no authority to enter a zoning -based determination on the issues
raised in the November 14, 2011 appeal filed by the Traditions on the Monon Homeowners
Association; and
4. Non zoning issues raised by the Homeowners Association are not properly before
this Board.
ORDERED this day of 2012.
1/2735548.1
CARMEL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals