Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGeorge Harvey Construction/CO4/ENG/Cool Creek Trails/inc 5,645 Contract No:R -29657 Change Order No.: 004 INDIANA Department of Transportation Page: 1 Construction Change Order and Time Extension Summary Contract Information Contract No.: R -29657 Letting Date:02/09/2011 District:GREENFIELD DISTRICT AE:Goldner, Rob PE /S:Surber, Rob Status:Draft Change Order Information Change Order No.: 004 EWA: Y or Force Acct: N Date Generated: 00 /00 /0000 Date Approved: 00 /00 /0000 Reason Code: CHANGED COND, Materials Related Description: Floor Beam modification due to lenght Original Contract Amount 583,765.77 Current Change Order Amount 5,645.00 Percent: 0.967 Total Previous Approved Changes 5,465.00 Percent: 0.936 Total Change To -Date 11,110.00 Percent: 1.903 Modified Contract Amount 594,875.77 Time Extension Information iCg• Date Initiated 00 /00 /0000 Date Completed 00/00/0000 Original Contract Time SS Completion Date 00 /00 /0000 or SS Calendar/Work Days 0 SP Date 00/00 /0000 or SP Days (SS Standard Specification, SP Special Provision) Time Element Description: Current Time Extension SS Days 0 SP Days 0 SP Days Value 0.00 Previous Time Approved SS Days by AE: DCE: SCE: DDCM: SS Days SP Days Value Revised Contract Time SS Completion Date 00 /00 /0000 or SS Calendar/Work Days 0 SS Date 00 /00 /0000 or SP Days 0 4s i Nattit*D .�s R DOGS ti V) ti Cr J Contract No:R -29657 Change Order No.: 004 INDIANA Department of Transportation Page: 2 Construction Change Order and Time Extension Summary Review and Approval Information Required Approval Authority AE: DCE: SCE: DDCM: ($perChangeOrder) LE$ 250K-) LE$750K- LE$2M— GT$2M (Days per Contract) (50 SS days 100 SS days 200 SS Days (GT 200 SS days) Verbal Approval Required? Y N If Y, by Date Issued Total Change To- Date >5 Y N If Y Copy to Program Budget Manager Scope /Design Recommendation Y N If Y, Referred to Project Manager(PM) Required? Date to PM Date Returned Approval Authority Concurs with PM? Y N If Y, Concurrence by Date If N,Resolution: Approved Disapproved Resolved by Date LPA Signatures Required? Y N If Y, Date to LPA Date Returned FHWA Signatures Required? Y N If Y, Date to FHWA Date Returned Field Engineer Recommendation (Required for SCE or DDCM Approval) Field Engineer Date Comments: I Contract No:R -29657 INDIANA Date:05/05/2011 Change Order No:004 Department of Transportation Page: 3 Contract: R -29657 Project: 0600390 State:0600390 Change Order Nbr: 004 Change Order Description: Floor Beam modification due to lenght Reason Code: CHANGED COND, Materials Related CLN PCN PLN Item Code Unit Unit Price CO Qty Comment Amount Change 0087 0600390 0087 711 -51038 LS 5,645.000 1.000 C Amount$ 5,645.00 Item Description: STRUCTURAL STEEL Supplemental Descriptionl: Floor beams have to be field modified due to being to long. Supplemental Description2: Total Value for Change Order 004 5,645.00 Whereas, the Standard Specifications for this contract provides for such work to be performed, the following change is recommended. General or Standard Change Order Explanation The floor beams on the bridge are longer than shown on plans. The correction of cutting the beams was the cheaper of the two options to eliminate the issue. Change Order Explanation for Specific Line Item N.. It Is the intent of the parties that this change order is full and complete compensation for the work describe above. Notification and consent to this change order Is hereby acknowledged. Contractor. Signed By: Date: NOTE: Other required State and FHWA signatures will be obtained electronically through the SiteManager system. Contract No:R -29657 INDIANA Date:05/05/2011 Change Order No:004 Department of Transportation Page: 4 HN Hf Hf APPROVED FOR LOCAL PUBLIC AGENCY Gin/ ati4i ,Jr e. s(1/// (SIGNATURE) (TITLE) (DATE (SIGNATURE) (TITLE) (DATE) SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION PENS 1N 1N11N111fifrlMHHHNNfiiNHHNNeH�ll kl NfIIHYNHININH�HMNM11iN1N11fYf1 fN APPROVED FOR INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORATION Approval Level Name of Approver Date Status George R. Harvey Son, Inc. 964 N. SR 39 Danville IN. 46122 317345.5169 Fax 317.745.2733 April 26, 2011 Rob Surber Project Supervisor Butler, Faiiman Seufert J L 4.- Contract: R- 29657 -A ..5/ I Re: Floor Beam Length Rob, The center to center of the two trusses does not match the Plans. We have figured the center line to center line of the trusses to be 17' 3 -3/4 Plans show 15'10". There are two options we can due to correct this. One is to widen the abutments and add another stringer and decking. The other is to cut the floor beams to a length to get the Plan center to center of trusses correct. 6 We have done a cost analysis of the two options. The cutting of the floor beams will be 4 E edesign of the abutment a deck is about $7,346.00. See the attached computation sheet. Please let us know which direction to take so we can order the structural steel and stare on the floor beams if that is the direction you want to take. If you have any questions, please contact me at 317.745.5169 or dickharvey@a.sbcglobal.net. Cordially, 7,/t- 7, ---4 -1/ J Richard A. Harvey An Equal Opportunity Employer Z9 57 Ca,./- Sloe..- E 4 F�,� 8 s c» re lAss 4 6,2 S G. Le at: X ONE. fiat fmJ O£ 9p-04-54e-4-1 24 tv.,4 -cit_ wir u-. 9 Ax-r 15 44.11 S sAi,a7 12 ,xj SW J e .Tw -3, /0 /364-c,i Lwr 4 B nS SA-v,/ o,t. PI-as c«.-rrEL Z0e, [_4B. 2m Z 44.1 G -r X 4- s //zo BJeE. R t�.TS L at3oQ i r+ a,j k 8) 70 SGa 3(Qo _...P.e N_•o .3U e q. 2 403 0... S w 147 -4 N- 1?!- f-.-a- ai Gu /a e Kam,:.. Zy ,-a_ V 7d 4 75 7 to l /0 e 7 7 00 ;0-,„,F,... -4 3 ADD 5"1 e{, t2 P.04- 4, e Z 5,6 4 5 5 s �a soo° z zlz o sib. 227 Z p �a /54 81 zz-9 r� Z Zo9- 16 6#` S► 3 Z it i 5 y 90- 1_1 Z I oce�4-S im. Gl�ss`p: 415)1- a LC y -4./.1- i I ....._„...1....„-- lOr 4 l ,744 V656 Z b 4. ptw 0VVM1,C. X 1 za Sal Z Z7° 3 —.5;_0.46, 29657 -4 5/2 //7 S/ken .1 r -a,2 BE441 T p 5 t4D e 'r o f 1 T r LG?72_ 5 E c ∎A1s L 00 2.6s d r TO WE 4' ii CuT e_xisrl.54 geae..4.&1 4 X 4- Z%Qc_T3 ?km /lop„a- L ur rr_. ,a C..wiirroNI 4 4 Deus.. 14-oc. b,s 14 r Botts to &A. C.Lcr reylsi IL. FLto LAsoi. Z uze-10 14a a as Z5 Lu t' N-01.4.4. t tJ )UST k. 4 5CA A,s 4 EA, LA r Z ill. e 7D iv 24a- 645 p Zs M-OLE 14 &A.. LA-koe 411-Q e_70 Zik, srts 8otr% 16 LA /6 Ego /4,0 4 O Qz o s 6�- Follow up issues Page 1 of 1 Follow up issues Littlejohn, David W [dlittlejohn @carmel.in.gov] Sent Friday, April 29, 2011 1:55 PM To: Robert Surber Attachments: C0_2_Greyhound_trail.pdf (57 KB) bridge_deck_and_curb.pdf (109 KB) DSCN1494.JPG (401 KB) DSCN1499.JPG (385 KB) retaning_wall conf.pdf (268 KB) Rob, I was able to meet with Mike M and discuss the project after our meeting. Attached is a signed CO. We are also comfortable with the most recent proposal for the traffic maintenance. I confirmed the bridge deck colors and have attached a scan of the approved colors for the deck and curb (the deck color is the "Dark Gray" and the curb is the only gray that was provided in their samples). If you need more detail on these, please let me know. If you need to pick them up, I can leave them at our front office. For the trusses, we agreed that the best option is cutting the floor beams and are comfortable moving ahead with the quoted price. For the retaining walls, I have attached a couple of pictures of the walls that were built for the Hagan Burke Trail. I think it is best to keep the walls similar to the existing wall. The closest fit that I saw in the brochure Harvey provided was the Allan Block AB Classic Champagne wall. I attached a scan of the page for your reference. I think that covers everything we discussed this morning, but if I missed something or you need anything else please feel free to contact me. I will be out of the office until Thursday, the David Littlejohn, AICP Alternative Transportation Coordinator Department of Community Services City of Carmel One Civic Sq Carmel, IN 46032 (317) 571 -2306 A Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail https //bfsnt6.bfsengr.com/owa/ ?ae= Item &t IPM. Note& id= RgAAAAAtiGCV xsgkQ41fDRhPmMenBwCYK... 5/5/2011