Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket 07-23-12Gray Oaks Docket Nos. 12060005 V thru 12060009 V VARIANCES CITY OF CARMEL, INDIANA July 23, 2012 Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals Applicant: The Old Town Design Group, LLC Attorneys Nelson Frankenberger, P.C. Attn: James E. Shinaver, Attorney 844 -0106 Attn: Jon C. Dobosiewicz Professional Land Planner 844 -0106 TABLE OF CONTENTS Explanation of Requests 2. Aerial Photograph Location Exhibit 3. Color Site Plan Exhibit 4. Primary Plat 5. Engineered Landscape Plan 6. Open Space Schedule and Exhibit 7. Concept Lot Landscaping 8. Proposed Architectural Design Guidelines 9. Concept Home Elevations 10. Concept 1 Plot Plan 11. Concept 2 Plot Plan 12. Findings of Fact Gray Oaks TOC BZA 070612 TAB 1 EXPLANATION The applicant, The Old Town Design Group, LLC is desirous of developing a residential neighborhood to be known as Gray Oaks. Gray Oaks will include 41 lots on approximately 23 acres located on the west side of Gray Road approximately �I� mile south of East 146 Street. The area of Gray Oaks is identified on the aerial photograph included under Tab 2 of this submittal, In order to allow this development, two approvals are necessary; namely, the approval of a primary plat by the Plan Commission and the approval of variances pertaining to the positioning of the homes on individual lots by the Board of Zoning Appeals. To this end the Plan Commission will hold a public hearing regarding the Primary Plat on July 17, 2012 and the variance requests will be heard by the Board of zoning Appeals on July 23, 2012. By way of general background, The Old Town Design Group, LLC has built a strong reputation for quality home construction within Old Town Carmel. The homes proposed for construction at this location are similar in design character to the homes they have built in Old Town and are fully detailed in the Architectural Guidelines provided under Tab 8 and the Concept Home Elevations included under Tab 9 of this submittal. Project landscaping and open space as illustrated under Tab 5 and Tab 6 respectively have been designed to preserve significant existing tree plantings along the south perimeter of the site, buffer homes from Gray Road and enhance the internal streetscape. The Old Town Design Group's variance requests are comprehensively detailed by the individual explanations of each variance request and the Findings of Fact provided under Tab 12 of this informational brochure, which are supported by the proposed architectural standards, concept home examples, lot landscaping and plot plans. As demonstrated by the renderings and exhibits the primary plat will, with the approval of the requested variances, produce a desirable and upscale enclave of unique homes that will compliment the various neighborhoods in the surrounding area. We look forward to presenting this request to you on July 23, 2012. Gray Oake BZA Explanation 071212 Respectfully submitted, James E. Shinaver Jon C. Dobosiewi z 8%& 146Street th SITE NORTH NORTH Gray Road Property Site Location Map / Aerial Photograph 8%& 8%& GRAY OAKS, HAMILTON COUNTY, INDIANA A PART OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION TWENTY (20), TOWNSHIP EIGHTEEN (18) NORTH, RANGE FOUR (4) EAST, LOCATED IN HAMILTON COUNTY, INDIANA DOCKET NO. 12050015 PP DOCKET NO. 12060005-9 V SURVEYOR CROSSROAD ENGINEERS, PC 3417 SHERMAN DR. PROJECT LOCATION BEECH GROVE, IN 46107 PHONE: (317) 780-1555 FAX: (317) 780-6525 CONTACT: TRENT NEWPORT OWNER/DEVELOPER THE OLD TOWN DESIGN GROUP, LLC 1132 S. RANGELINE ROAD CARMEL, IN 46033 PHONE: (317) 966-2023 CONTACT: JUSTIN MOFFETT SECTION CORNERS TBM#2 EXISTING LEGENDPROPOSED LEGEND GENERAL NOTES PAVEMENT DETAILS SHEET 1 OF 2 GRAY OAKS, HAMILTON COUNTY, INDIANA A PART OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION TWENTY (20), TOWNSHIP EIGHTEEN (18) NORTH, RANGE FOUR (4) EAST, LOCATED IN HAMILTON COUNTY, INDIANA DEED OF DEDICATIONBOARD OF PUBLIC WORKSSURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE AND SAFETY CERTIFICATE CURVE DATA TABLE DELTA ARCCHORDCHORD CURVERADIUS ANGLELENGTHDIRECTIONLENGTH LINE TABLE NUMBERDIRECTIONDISTANCE BENCHMARK INFORMATION FLOODPLAIN INFORMATION SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILYSINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL PLAT DESCRIPTION ZONED: R1 ZONED: R1ZONED: S1 CARMEL PLAN COMISSION CERTIFICATE SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONED: S1 RESIDENTIAL ZONED: R1 ZONED: R1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONED: R1 MORGANS CREEK CT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONED: S1 LOCATION AND ZONING MAP SHEET 2 OF 2 146th STREET SOIL DESCRIPTIONSEROSION CONTROL LEGEND SLOPE GRADIENT Br MmB2 MmB2 MmB2 MmA MmC2 Br EROSION CONTROL BLANKET STAPLE PATTERN DETAIL SOILS MAP WELLSWOOD BEND TBM#2 FILL SLOPE SECTION HOLEY MOLEY SAYS END SECTION "DON'T DIG BLIND" RIPRAP DETAILS LOT TEMPLATE DETAIL SILT FENCE DETAIL PAVEMENT DETAILS DETAIL "A" DETAIL "B" SECTION A-A ATTACHING TWO SILT FENCES 1-800-382-5544 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION SLOPE INSTALLATION ENTRANCE DETAIL 8%& 8%& CITY OF CARMEL SUBDIVISION CONTROL ORDINANCE EXHIBIT A OPEN SPACE SCHEDULE SUBDIVISION NAME: +6%=3%/7 1. SITE ACREAGE __________± )<'09()7463437)(+6%=63%(6; %G 2. ZONE DISTRICT __________ 6  3. MINIMUM OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT (SOSR) ______/________acres WJX  SJ%G   4. OPEN SPACE PROVIDED (OSP) ______/________acres  SJ%G  WJX 5. PRIMARY CONSERVATION AREAS Well-head Protection Area FEMA/IDNR 100 year Floodway FEMA/IDNR 100-year Flood Fringe Wetlands (>1/4 ac.) White River Corridor Scrub Woodland Steep slopes (10%) Young Woodland Mature Woodland Historic Structures/Sites Special Opportunity Corridor (identify) Other  6. NATURAL OPEN SPACE PROVIDED ______/________acres  WJX 7. AGRICULTURAL OPEN SPACE ______/________acres 2%  8. DESIGNED OPEN SPACE ______/________acres WJX Square Parks Green < Boulevard Greenbelt Paths < < < Trails Golf Courses Pond (see below) < Other ___________________________________________________________ 9. CONSERVANCY LOTS ______no. lots ________acres 2% PJX4SRH _ _l.f. 10. PONDS total measured perimeter (in linear feet) ____ PJX4SRH total measured accessible perimeter (not bounded) _____l.f. _______% PJX  4SRH PJX  4SRH Chapter 7: Open Space Standards For Major Subdivisions 7-11 as amended per Z-346; Z-458-04; Z-475-05; Z-483-05; Z-516-08 Spring 2008 v1 NATURAL OPEN SPACE AREA = 0.78 Ac. OPEN SPACE SUMMARY DESIGN OPEN SPACE USEABLE AREA = 1.89 Ac. DESIGN OPEN SPACE NATURAL OPEN SPACE (TREE PRESERVATION AREA) AREA = 0.66 Ac. DESIGN OPEN SPACE DESIGN OPEN SPACE AREA = 0.22 Ac. AREA = 1.21 Ac. DESIGN OPEN SPACE DESIGN OPEN SPACE USEABLE AREA = 0.26 Ac. AREA = 0.09 Ac. FLETCHER CIRCLE DESIGN OPEN SPACE NATURAL OPEN SPACEAREA = 0.35 Ac. AREA = 0.32 Ac. (TREE PRESERVATION AREA) AREA = 0.29 Ac. DESIGN OPEN SPACE AREA = 0.17 Ac. DESIGN OPEN SPACE AREA = 0.03 Ac. NATURAL OPEN SPACE (TREE PRESERVATION AREA) AREA = 0.59 Ac. 8%& 8%& GRAY OAKS ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STANDARDS STRUCTURE AND DESIGN STANDARDS AND PROVISIONS Homes in the Gray Oaks Subdivision shall maintain a consistent architectural style, in both form and trim, throughout. The trim shall be present on all sides of the building, as appropriate. Appropriateness shall be defined as utilizing features and forms that are considered typical to the chosen architectural style, and shall be determined by Developer or Committee review. All building elements are subject to the most current edition of the Indiana Building Code. A. SITE DESIGN 1. Buildings shall be designed and sited in such a way as to maximize solar gain and privacy. 2. Site design shall be context sensitive with regards to existing natural features. B. BUILDING SCALE /MASSING Building character, scale, and mass shall be similar to existing buildings. This may be accomplished through siting, setback, buffering, driveway location, height, and other elements. 2. Dwellings shall not feature long, unbroken expanses of wall. This may be accomplished by including the following features: a. Variations in height and depth b. Windows and door openings c. Changes in roof line or height d. Details and trim appropriate to the style and mass of the building e. Use of different materials, textures, and material placement f. Placement of landscaping materials and street furniture g. Balconies, recessed entries, and covered porches h. Bays and towers 3. All sides of the building shall have similar level of detail and material use. C. WINDOWS 1. At least two windows shall be present on each facade, and each occupied level, as architecturally appropriate. One window shall be permitted on half stories. 2. All windows, on all sides of the house, shall have trim as architecturally appropriate. 3. Windows shall be operable, to provide for cross ventilation. 4. Windows and trim must be framed in wood or vinyl -clad wood. 5. Vertical, rectangular double -hung or casement windows are required to be the dominant window type. These may be used in multiple sets to create larger expanses of window area. D. ENTRYWAYS Entryways shall be clearly visible and shall be the dominant feature of the front facade, or the side facade 2. Porches shall be a minimum of seven feet deep, and shall be provided where architecturally appropriate. 3. Covered porches facing the street on the first floor of the structure are required and must be a minimum of seven feet deep except directly in front of the door where they may be a minimum of five feet deep. All front porches must be a minimum of seventy -five (75) square feet in size. 4. Uncovered decks are not allowed in the front yard. 5. Side lights or glass panes should be provided, to allow illumination and to allow residents to see outside 6. Permitted materials include fiberglass, painted steel, and wood. E. CHIMNEYS 1. Chimneys shall extend fully to the ground, and above the eaves, if external. Direct vent fireplace are not required to have a chimney 2. Chimneys shall be made of masonry or stucco material or panels, or material with a similar, durable appearance. Siding is not a permissible material. 3. "Shed- style" or bump -out chimneys shall not be permitted. 4. Chimneys must be capped. F. GARAGES 1. Garages shall not be the dominant feature of the front facade. 2. If off -set or side loading, the facade facing the street shall have at least one window. 3. The garage, if front loading, shall comprise no more than 30% of the main front facade. G. FOUNDATIONS If building foundations are to be exposed, they shall be finished with stone, brick, brick -form poured concrete, fieldstone, or split -face block, and shall remain unpainted. 2. Wall cavities of foundation walls constructed of brick veneer extending below grade shall be grouted solid up to the flashing, with weep holes above. Weep holes shall be unobstructed by mulch or soil. Such flashing shall be 8 -12" above grade. 3. Surface- applied waterproofing shall not be exposed unless it matches the concrete. H. ROOFLINES 1. Roofs shall have minimum 12" overhangs, on all sides of the structure, if architecturally appropriate. 2. Dormers and gables should be used to help break long roof lines. If used, they shall have attic bands, windows, and /or decorative attic vents. 3. Vents and stacks shall be painted to match the roof, or painted black, and shall not be visible from the public right -of -way. 4. Roofs may be made of dimensional shingles, glazed clay, standing -seam metal, slate /faux slate, or fire protected wood shingles. 5. Solar shingles and panels are strongly encouraged; if used, they shall be placed as unobtrusively as possible while maximizing solar gain. 6. Gutters and downspouts or rain chains shall be provided. 7. The primary roof slope shall not be less than 7/12. 8. Maximum Building Height: Thirty (30) feet to the midpoint of the cornice and the ridgeline. I. MATERIALS If more than one material or color is used, the transition between materials and /or colors shall be logical, i.e. to highlight an architectural feature. If a material such as brick or stone is used on the front facade but not the side facades, a logical transition with trim, such as quoins, shall be provided. Vinyl siding shall be prohibited. 2. If El FS or dryvit are used, they should be used only as trim materials, or placed above the first floor to limit damage. 3. All sides of the Principal and Accessory Buildings must be clad in wood, brick, stone, or fiber cement siding. Similar materials must be used on all sides of the building. 4. Garages and other Accessory Buildings shall use exterior materials similar to the Principal Building. J. DETAILS TRIM Architectural trim and details are encouraged on all dwellings. If such details are used, they shall be used on all sides of the building, and shall be architecturally appropriate and balanced with regards to placement and scale. Suitable elements include, but are not limited to: Quoins Pilasters Eaves of at least 12" in depth Corner boards, gable boards, and barge boards Pediments Lintels and sills Soldier coursing Balustrades Friezes, cornices, dentils, modillions, etc Brackets Shutters. If shutters are used, they should be appropriately scaled to the windows, and be functional or appear to be functional. Buildings with clapboard or similar facades shall have all openings trimmed with wood trim at least 4" nominal width, and corners trimmed with wood at least 6" nominal width. K. LANDSCAPE LIGHTING 1. A paved walkway from the porch or front door to the front sidewalk is required. 2. The remaining Front Yard of all buildings will be maintained with a groomed landscape of low shrubs, ground cover, trees, flowers and /or grass. 3. Exterior lighting is restricted to lamps mounted on the building, seven -foot (7') maximum height pole mounted decorative lights, and low- wattage landscape lighting. 4. Fences greater than thirty -six (36) inches tall are not allowed forward of the Front Line of the Principal Building. 5. Dumpsters and trash receptacle must be screened from view. 8%& ŽŶĐĞƉƚ,ŽŵĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶƐ TAB 10 LOT COVERAGE SUMMARY 8%& LOT COVERAGE SUMMARY 8%& See Exhibit "A See Exhibit "A See Exhibit "A Gray Oaks BZA FOF 071112 CARMEL ADVISORY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No.: 12060005 V thru 12060015 V Petitioner: The Old Town Design Group, LLC FINDINGS OF FACT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals that Development Standards Variance Docket No. is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this day of 2012. CHAIRPERSON, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals SECRETARY, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals DECISION Conditions of the Board are listed on the back. (Petitioner or his representative to sign). EXPLANATION OF REQUESTED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCES and FINDINGS OF FACT Requested Variances: A. Section 7.04.03.A B. Section 7.04.03.A C. Section 7.04.03.A D. Section 7.04.03.A E. Section 7.04.03.A The applicant seeks approval to allow: (i) A minimum 20' front yard setback to provide for a more attractive streetscape and to provide greater project open space is requested. The Applicant plans homes with larger front porches and a greater visual connection to the street that can not be achieved by the standard 35' front yard setback. Likewise, locating the homes closer to the interior streets allows for greater project open space and landscape preservation while maintaining the required lot size. Required side load garages will ensure adequate driveway area to accommodate parking of cars and efficient access to the street. Gray Oaks BZA FOF 071112 EXHIBIT "A" Minimum Front Yard 35' Minimum Side Yard 10' Minimum Aggregate of Side Yard 20' Minimum Lot Width 100' Maximum Lot Coverage 35% (ii) A minimum 5' side yard setback is requested to accommodate a required design aspect of the homes proposed for development in the subdivision. As noted above, the homes will require utilization of a side load garage. When the side load design standard is used, a greater setback is necessary adjacent to one side of the home to allow for a driveway accommodating maneuvering of cars into and out of the garage. Providing a minimum side yard of 5' allows for the home to be situated closer to the opposite side yard assisting with the achievement of the side load design standard. The Applicant is requesting a 5' adjustment to assist with this design aspect. (iii) A minimum 10' aggregate of side yards is requested in a limited circumstance. As noted above, the homes will require utilization of a side load garage. The Applicant would like to account for the possibility of a home providing for an additional garage bay to the rear of the side load garage that will face the street. As illustrated, this additional garage bay design would lessen the side yard setback on the garage side of the home to less than the standard 20'. In order to account for this potential design option, the Applicant is requesting a 10' aggregate side yard only in the circumstance where this design option is utilized. iv) A minimum 90' lot width is requested in order to accommodate greater project open space area and enhance the interior development streetscape as described in (i) above. The Applicant is requesting a 10' adjustment to assist in achieving this design goal. FINDINGS OF FACT 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: Gray Oaks BZA FOF 071112 (v) A maximum lot coverage of 45% is requested to accommodate design aspects of the proposed homes in the subdivision as well. As previously described, the homes will require side load garages. When this design standard is employed, a larger ranch home and drive way necessary to accommodate a side loaded garage occupy more lot area than a typical two story home with a front facing garage. As illustrated, a lager surface area is required for the driveway that would be adjacent to and not exclusively in front of the home. Likewise with ranch homes, additional square footage can only be accommodated by utilizing additional lot area. The Applicant is requesting a 10% adjustment to account for these two design aspects. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: The proposed variances relate to design standards that are internal to the proposed subdivision and will have little, if any, impact on surrounding properties. The proposed plan provides for significant open space and landscape preservation while maintaining the ordinance required lot area requirements and falling well below the ordinance permitted density of 2.9 units per acre, as the proposed subdivision has a density of 1.7 homes per acre. As a result, the approval of the proposed variances allowing this unique subdivision will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community. The proposed variances relate to design standards that are internal to the proposed subdivision and will have little, if any, impact on surrounding properties. The proposed plan provides for significant open space and landscape preservation which arguably will have a positive impact on surrounding properties. In addition, the density of the neighborhood will be well below the ordinance permitted density of 2.9 units per acre, as the proposed subdivision has a density of 1.7 homes per acre. As a result, the use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner. The strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would not permit the construction of the home product previously described above without site development changes that would significantly reduce or in some cased eliminate landscape preservation and other open space focal points of the subdivision. The strict application of terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in a practical difficulty because the Applicant will be unable to provide a home product that is specifically encouraged by the Comprehensive Plan, but not yet articulated within the text of the underlying zoning district. Docket No.: 12060005 V thru 12060015 V Petitioner: The Old Town Design Group, LLC FINDINGS OF FACT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheet) 1. 2. 3. DATED THIS DAY OF 2012. Gray Oaks BZA FOF 071112 CARMEL ADVISORY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Carmel, Indiana Board Member