The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutResponse to Engr'g, Duncan sr� � wwawwawww � N , ('ONS ..l' ,[ li (::i l�"N(;[ l,FRS - l-Al' D SURVEYORS Davicl ii,atcaeppelwa tlz Nra"5.0ofit.,C;.EO pwrw8w s--Jo�ro ul F"wylloop F'dCPi"'�a;¢bwro r!I�rae9 ¢.0+,a yrtaw September 5, 201 Canfis G.B hof 'vicar PlesE"oo COO City of Carmel F'pea1ors qu7rv:"w h ll irk*;'ou o'tiras Department of Engineering R ,stoeppelwerth One Civic Square tlaxAnckr Carmel, Indiana 46032 Prof a",O o A F rvgr ee Nurn4ssr;�bir�tw�W tl �r2c6�Si.uvu,y'w'wr. Attention: [fir, Cary Duncan Re: Village of'Pest Clay„ Section 10010-C Gear Mr. Duncan: Enclosed please find a set of Construction Plans which were revised in accordance with your comment letter dated August 8, 2012, Those comments were addressed as follows: 1. Noted, We are currently working with John Thomas for approval of our SWPPP, All current easements are now shown and labeled. , We are currently working with crossroads on adding the additional Volume Required and Volume Provided information to the Drainage Summary. I will send you an electronic pdf file of sheets C2010 and 0201 once this is revised.. 4. Sheet 0900 Landscape Plan has been removed from the construction set and Title Sheet. h, We have renarned the Cover 'Sheet to "Title" Sheet (CO01 S. See comment#4 above, 7. We have included the legal description for this project on the Title Sheet.. & We have added the design speed to the Title Sheet. g, The L.M.A.E. is to provide a 10' strip to allow for perimeter plantings per City requirements. Per our discussions with your office and the County dr^,�qa�"i&.�1w9 lticrl4r�Wrt^Cd F„she,s„,imfiana 'Surveyor's Office we have concluded that the 0” Drainage Easement 46038-2505 would be allowed to "overlap" this landscape easement. Or, in other 317 849. 935 words the " outside of the 1'g" landscape easement would be sufficient, Fax 317,840,5942 It is understood that landscape easements are typically separate from n,^'N1�Gteae4��r�Cu�r,"r'Cir carip7 drainage easements however in this case we will Use trees with non- Carmel Engineering September 5, 2012 Page 2 aggressive root systems per order from the County Surveyor in order to avoid complications with the drainage systern. 10. Yes, the Common Area behind Lots 7-15 will be a blanket drainage and utility easement, 11, We have revised Our grades to match the existing flow path in this area to avoid complications with existing trees. 12, The T.P.E.'s have been added to the plat and will not conflict with drainage or utility easements. 13. The Common Area has been labeled on the Plat as C.A. #1 14, 0' drainage easements have been provided for all swales. See comment#9 above. 15. We have submitted an exhibit to illustrate the proposed "thoroughfare" dimensions for your review per our meeting discussions. 16. The centerline radius for M,00nseed Drive has been revised to 150 ft. per City standards, 17. The radius for the centerline along Teaberry Lane is now shown and labeled on the Plat (C9). 18. The future extension of Moonseed Drive was also revised and will be 150 ft. per the City minimum standard. 19. We have revised all the sanitary sewers to be perpendicular to the road when crossings occur, 20. We have revised all storm sewer to be perpendicular to the road when crossings occur, 21. All existing and proposed hydrants are now shown on the Site Development Plans within 300 feet of the development. 22. We have shown all the utilities on the Topographical Plan as well as the Site Development Plan to the best of our knowledge. 23. The construction lit-nits are now shown and labeled on all sheets. 24, We have shown and labeled the as-built street dimensions of the existing street to the west that will be connected to Rayne Street. 25, There will be no SSD installed across the street centerlines. All SS,D will be either under the curb or in the rear yards. 26, The material and invert elevations for the watermain crossings are now labeled in the profiles. Carmel Engineering September 5, 2012 Page 3 27, The utility relocation statement has been updated on all necessary sheets. 28. Maintenance of Traffic Plan has been added to the Construction Plans (C404). 29, We have noted that the existing curb shall be removed to the nearest joint along St. Julian Street, The City's Chairback Curb Detail has been added to the Street Detail Sheet, More detail of this intersection is now shown on Sheet 0402. 30, We have extended our proposed street profile west, into the existing Section 10010-13 to ensure proper drainage to the existing inlets, 31. Per discussions with the County Surveyor's Office, all storm pipes will be under their jurisdiction and sanitary will be under CTRWD. We were not able to provide the full 2' of separation in one instance and have shown a concrete cradle which is acceptable by both HCSO and CTRWD- 32. The note on 0600 about the 30" or less cover has been removed. 33, All structure numbers are now shown on Sheets 0600 and 0601. 34. There are no longer any proposed SSD connections to the roadside SS D. Rear yard connections are now shown for all lots. 35. Offsite easement agreements will be provided by the developer. 36. The future road right-of-way for 12611' Street has been labeled as 5,0' Y2 and the R.D.E. is shown outside of this future right-of-way. 37, Due to tight boundary restraints and the detention required we were not able to keep the top of bank 50' away from the future right-of-ways. Therefore, we will be proposing a barrier of some kind with the future sections of this project in these areas. 38. MFPG elevations have been added for each lot. 39. The J.W, Brendle Legal Drain is completely piped across this site therefore I do not see where a BFE is noted on a study or necessary. 40. The swaie near Lot 6 and 7 has been revised to be 300 feet, 41,, The HCSO detail for swales has been edited to state SSD is required in ALL swales, 42. Note 2 on Sheet 0802 has been deleted. 43. RCP backfill per detaii D-23 will apply, Detail 10-28 on Sheet 0803 has been removed. Carmel Engineering September 5, 2012 Page 4 44, Detail BBC-1 has been removed from 0803. 45, The Hamilton County Highway Detail for roll, curb has been removed on Sheet 0804, 46, The pedestrian path detail has been removed from 0804. 47, The notes,for minimum cover for pipe crossing of City streets have been cleared Lip to only have one note instead of two. 48, Our intent is to show structural, B,MP's at all storm prior to outletting to Pond#1 with the wet pond being the 2'"d BMP. Pond #2 will be the first BMP in series with a structural BMP proposed on the outlet pipe (Str. 402). The configuration of Pond#2 has been revised to meet water quality requirements, 49. The intent of the interim Pond #2 was to eliminate the need to excavate the additional dirt until it was necessary for construction of future sections. However, we have decided to increase the pond size to meet City standards and have added soil stockpiles to be used in the future sections for fill purposes, 50. The easement has been shown to encompass the full build out of the detention facilities. If you have any questions or comments regarding these revisions, please feel free to give me a call at (317) 570-4841. Very truly yours, STOEPPELWERTH & ASSOCIATES, INC, Brett A. Huff Cc: Matt Lohimeyer Angie Conn BAH(mcb j)uncan09-04-12,dm AlgilleerM9