HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication
j ~
~'
e'
".'"-_.,;,'"
:.:.1>.' ..
.,
CITY OF CARMEL/CLA Y TOWNSHIP
HAMILTON COUNTY4t INDIANA
APPLICATION FOR BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ACTION
USE VARIANCE
FEE: $750.00
DATE RECEIVED:
1) Applicant: Anthony R. Buzzetti
Address: 180 East Carmel Drive" Carmel.. IN 46032
2) Project Name: Dr. Anthony Buzzetti - Veterinary Hospital Phone: 844-0049
Engineer/Architect: Shawn Curran Phone: 773-9804
Attorney: James E. Shinaver" Nelson & Frankenberger Phone: 844-0106
3) Applicant's Status: (Check the appropriate response)
(a) The applicant's name is on the deed to the property
(b) The applicant is the contract purchaser of the property
(c) Other: Tenant
4) If Item 3)(c) is checked, please complete the following:
Owner of the property involved: Murph Smurph Corporation
Owner's address: 180 East Carmel Drive" Carmel.. IN 46032 Phone: 590-7237
c/o Dr. Anthony Buzzetti
5) Record of Ownership:
Deed Book No./Instrument No. Parcel No. 16-10-31-00-00-034.000
Page: Purchase date:
6) Common address of the property involved: 1425 Rangeline Road" Cannel.. IN 46032
Legal description: See Exhibit "A" - Legal Description
Tax Map Parcel No.: 16-10-31-00-00-034.000
7) State explanation of requested Use Variance: (State what you want to do and cite the section number(s)
of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance which applies and/or creates the need for this appeal).
See Exhibit "B" - Explanation of Request
Page 1 of 8 - Use Variance Application
e
e
8) State reasons supporting the Use Variance: (Additionally, complete the attached question sheet entitled
"Findings of Fact-Use Variance").
See Exhibit "B" - Explanation
9)
10)
11)
12)
Present zoning of the property (give exact classification): B8
Present use of the property: Vacant commercial building
Size of lot/parcel in question: + 1 acre
Describe the proposed use of the property: Veterinary Hospital- see Exhibit B - Explanation
13)
Is the property:
Owner occupied
Renter occupied
Other Tenant
14) Are there any restrictions, laws, covenants, variances, special uses, or appeals filed in connection with
this property that would relate or affect its use for the specific purpose of this application? If yes, give
date and docket number, decision rendered and pertinent explanation.
None that Petitioner is aware of, to the best of his knowledge, information and belief
15) Has work for which this application is being filed already started? If answer is yes, give details: NO
Building Permit Number: NA
Builder: NA
16) If proposed appeal is granted, when will the work commence? Immediately
17) If the proposed appeal is granted, who will operate and/or use the proposed improvement for which this
application has been tiled? Petitioner and/or owner and their successors" assigns and heirs.
NOTE:
LEGAL NOTICE shall be published in the Noblesville Daily Ledger a MANDATORY twenty-five (25)
days prior to the public hearing date. The certified "Proof of Publication" affidavit for the newspaper must be
available for inspection the night of the hearing.
Page 2 of 8 - Use Variance Application
It
e
LEGAL.NOTICE to all adjoining and abutting property owners is also MANDATORY, two methods of notice are
recommended:
1) CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED sent to adjoining property owners. (The white receipt
should be stamped by the Post Office at Least Twenty-five (25) days prior to the public hearing date)
2) HAND DELIVERED to adjoining and abutting property owners (A receipt signed by the adjoining and abutting
property owner acknowledging the twenty-five (25) day notice should be kept for verification that the notice was
completed)
REALIZE THE BURDEN OF PROOF FOR ALL NOTICES IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT. AGAIN,
THIS TASK MUST BE COMPLETED AT LEAST TWENTY-FIVE (25) DAYS PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARING DATE.
The applicant understands that docket numbers will not be assigned until all supporting information has been
submitted to the Department of Community Services.
The applicant certifies by signing this application that he/she has been advised that all representations of the
Department of Community Services are advisory only and that the applicant should rely on appropriate subdivision and
zoning ordinance and/or the legal advice of his /her attorney.
I, , Auditor of Hamilton County, Indiana, certify that the attached
affidavit is a true and complete listing of the adjoining and adjacent property owners concerning Docket No.
OWNER
ADDRESS
AUDITOR OF HAMILTON COUNTY, INDIANA
Page 3 of8 - Use Variance Application
e
e
OWNER AFFIDAVIT
I hereby swear that I am the owner of Real Estate described in Exhibit "A" involved in this application and that the
foregoing signatures, statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects
true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I, the undersigned, authorize the applicant to act on my behalf with
regard to this application and subsequent hearings and testimony.
By:
(Please Print)
STATE OF INDIANA
SS:
County of H a ffi \ \ .tm\
(County in which notarization takes place)
forBa.~~ \+zm
Before me the undersigned, a Notary Public
County, State of Indiana, personally appeared
(Notary Public's county of residence)
, 2004.
If f PO
Public-Please Print
My commission expires: ~ I '241 0 Cf
Page 4 of 8 - Use Variance Application
e
e
PETITIONER CONSENT
The undersigned, Anthony R. Buzzetti, being the Petitioner of the real estate
descnbed in a Use Variance Application (the "Petition"), hereby consents to and joins in
the Petition, and appoints the law firm of Nelson & Frankenberger, P.C. and their
attorneys, Shawn Curran of Curran Architecture, and the engineering firm of Roger Ward
Engineering and their employees, to act for and on his behalf in all matters regarding the
above Petition before the City of Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals, and its committees
and agencies.
Date:
q/7/()i
H:\Janet\Buzzetti\Petitioner Consent-Use Variance. doc
It
It
CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
Carmel, Indiana
Docket No.:
Petitioner:
Dr. Anthony Buzzetti - Veterinarian Hospital
FINDINGS OF FACT - USE VARIANCE (Ballot Sheet)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
, 2004.
DA TED THIS
DA Y OF
Board Member
Page 7 of 8 - Use Variance Application
e
e
CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
CARMEL, INDIANA
Docket No.:
Petitioner: Dr. Anthony Buzzetti - Veterinarian Hospital
FINDINGS OF FACT - USE VARIANCE
1. The grant of this variance will not be contrary. to the public interest, due to the existence of special
condition( s) such that enforcement of the zoning ordinance will result in unnecessary hardship because
located .adjacent to the Real Estate and nearby the Real Estate are various parcels which are zoned B-1,
B-2, or B-3, all of which would permit a veterinarian hospital with a commercial kennel. Thus, while
the proposed veterinarian hospital is permitted on sites nearby and adjacent to the Real Estate, it is not
permitted on the Real Estate. Consequently, the proposed use. is consistent with surrounding zoning.
Further, the Petitioner will endure unnecessary hardship if the use variance is not granted because he
will. not be able to operate a veterinarian hospital on the Real Estate and he will be denied an
opportunity to construct upon the Real Estate a. new building which will be more compatible to the
adjacent buildings along Range line Road and he will be denied an opportunity to continue to foster the
redevelopment of sites located along Rangeline Road.
2. The grant of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of
the community because located adjacent to the Real Estate and nearby the Real Estate are various
parcels .which are zoned B-1, B-2, or B-3, all of which would permit a veterinarian hospital with a
'. commercial kennel. Thus, while the proposed veterinarian hospital is permitted on sites nearby and
adjacent to the Real Estate, it is not permitted on the Real Estate. Consequently, it appears that the
proposed use is consistent with surrounding zoning. Further, the granting of this variance will promote
public. health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because the Petitioner proposes to
construct upon the Real Estate a new building which will be more compatible to the adjacent buildings
along Rangeline Road and which will continue to foster the redevelopment of sites located along
Rangeline Road.
3. The use or value of the area adjacent to the subject property will not be substantially affected in any
adverse manner because located adjacent to the Real Estate and nearby the Real Estate are various
parcels which are zoned B-1, B-2, or B-3, all of which would permit a veterinarian hospital with a
commercial kennel. Thus, while the proposed veterinarian hospital is permitted on sites nearby and
adjacent .to the Real Estate, it is not permitted on the Real Estate. Consequently, it appears that the
proposed use is consistent with surrounding zoning. Further, if the use variance is granted and the Real
Estate is redeveloped, it should have a positive impact and effect on adjacent properties and their
property values.
4. The need for the variance arises from a natural condition peculiar to the subject because located adjacent
to the Real Estate and nearby the Real Estate are various parcels which are zoned B-1, B-2, or B-3, all
of which would permit a veterinarian hospital with a commercial kennel. Thus, while the proposed
veterinarian hospital is permitted on sites nearby and adjacent to the Real Estate, it is not permitted on
the Real Estate. How~ver, absent a use variance, the Petitioner will be denied the opportunity to operate
a veterinarian hospital on the Real Estate and he will be denied an opportunity to continue to foster the
redevelopment of sites located along Rangeline Road.
5. The granting of this variance does not substantially interfere with the Carmel/Clay Comprehensive Plan
because located adjacent to the Real Estate and nearby the Real Estate are various parcels which are
zoned B-1, B-2, or B-3, all of which would permit a veterinarian hospital with a commercial kennel.
Thus, the proposed use appears to be consistent with permitted uses surrounding the Real Estate.
Further, the Comprehensive Plan for this general area seems to suggest a designation of Low
e e
Intens'ity/Regional- Commercial Employment Area. Thus, the proposed use variance request IS
compatible with the Comprehensive Plan.
DECISION
IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Use Variance
Docket No. is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board, which are
incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof.
Adopted this
day of
, 2004.
CHAIRPERSON, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals
SECRETARY, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals
Conditions of the Board are listed on the back.
Page 8 of 8 - Use Variance Application
.-
) , 09/02/2004 11: 57
8444111
e
JEFFREY SLAUGHTER4It
LANDMARK TITLE . ..'
PAGE 07/14
t41 008/015
08102/2004 00:01 FAX
3175798801
OO~INOA~!ON SHEET
SCHEDULB It.
Cc~!tment Numba%~ ~0323-1eeO
~art of the Southwr:~st Q1Jart.er of Section 3l, TO'^'I1ship 18 North,
Range 4- Eas ~ .in Cl r1Y Township, lian\il ton County I Indimna, more
particularly descr~h~d as fallows:
Beginning a t. ~ po 11j1 t of the Weet. 1 ine of t.he Sout:hwea t Quarte:r of
SecticI1 31, Townah:.p 18 North, Range 4 East which i$ .2'5.00 feet
North 01 aegrees 04 minucee 45 seconds west (aBsurned bearing) of
t;he Sout.hweet cornnr thereof; thence North 01 degrees 04 minutes
45 se~cnds Wesc on and along the We9~ line of ~aid Southwest
Quarter 210.00 Eee/I; thence North 89 degrees 50 minutes lS
seconds East pari;'l...el with the SO\1tn line of said Southwe5tt
Quarter 250. 00 feea~; t:hance South 01 degrees 04 minutes 45
secono.s Ea~t: paral..~l with the said West. line 210.00 feet; thence
South SSJ degrees 50 minutes lS aeconds West parallel with said
Sout1111ne 250.00 :~eet r.o the place of beginning.
Togecher wit:h all (It. the Grantor' S X'igh'~, title and interest; in
and to the non-exc-:us1va easement of ingress and egres; reserved
t'or the ua9 of r..}le G:raI1tor in t.hat certain Warranty Deed dated
September 20, 1973"e~ecu~ed by Landmark Oevelopmenc Company to
Woodland Sho~p~a I l~n' Indiana pa.rtn8~ehip consisting of I _ S.
Lazerov and F%"anC=~f~ ~ - Lazerov which deed was r~c:orded October 2,
1973 in Deed Recor~ ;:~g, pages 480-4Bl in the Office of the
Recorder of Hamiltt~ County, Indiana.
except:. ~
I
. ,
Part of the .sOl.\l:hWl~!st:. Quart.er of' Sec~ion 31, Township 18 Norch I
R&nge 4 East., Ham1:Cop County I Indiana/more part.icularly
dsecr1bec1 as follo,.,e i
A parcel of raal e~~ate 35 feet in width by~parallel lines, the
~enter line of which begins at 8 point on the West l1na or Parcel
1 as descrihed in deed to Woodland ShoppeB hereinabove
identified, disl:a~1: 275 feet measured Nort:h 01 degree 04 minut.es
~5 seconds West frQm the Southwesc co~er ~hereof, tnence Sou~h
89 degrees SO minute$ 15 seconds Heac 3.30 feet to a pOint;
thence ~Torth 01 der.,ree 04 minutee 4S eecondsW~r:gt 17..s0 teet
along the West 'J,inQ:~ of said parcel l to the pOint: of beg.:LnninQ;
t.hence South 89 deHreea 50 minut;.es 15 se~onds ~lest 250 feet to
the cencer line of weacfield Boulevard, the same being the West
line of said ~aX"tr'r Seotion.
END OF SCHEDULE A
::,...,...."'EX.HIBIT::.;,. .
Page 4a
b'\
:0.
D' ,
'.19"
.; ,. ..
-~., .;:. - . ...-
.t:.
'....
It
e
EXHIBIT "B"
Explanation of Request
The Applicant, Dr. Anthony R. Buzzetti, currently operates a veterinarian hospital in Carmel. Dr.
Buzzetti desires to relocate his existing business from 180 East Carmel Drive, Carmel, Indiana 46032, to
a site located at 1425 Rangeline Road, Carmel, Indiana 46032, which is legally described in what is
attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A" ("Real Estate"). In connection with the Use
Variance application, Dr. Buzzetti has also filed a Development Plan Application and a ADLS
Application. The. plans and drawings included with the applications set forth the manner in which Dr.
Buzzetti desires to develop the site. The Real Estate is zoned B-8 Business, which does not specifically
permit a veterinarian hospital. Thus, Dr. Buzzetti must seek a Use Variance to operate a veterinarian
hospital on the Real Estate. Further, since the proposed use will operate seven (7) days a week and it
includes 24 hour boarding of animals, the proposed building layout includes residential quarters on the
second floor to accommodate staff who will stay overnight in the building to provide care and supervision
for the animals.
The following are a list of functions to be associated with the proposed veterinarian hospital
facility:
. Surgery
. Wellnesscare (exams, vaccinations, etc.)
. Laboratory evaluation of patients
. Orthopedic rehab swimming pool
. Intensive care unit
. Consultation
. Radiography
. Endoscopy
. Dental repair and cleaning
. Pharmacy
. Management offices
. Merchandising
. Professional grooming
. Hospitalization
. Overnight indoor boardinglkennel
. Exercise area and sample collection
. Commercial kennel
The above list of functions associated with the facility are related to animal treatment and care.
Finally, the redevelopment of the Real Estate will include demolishing the existing building and
constructing a new building in its place. The new building includes building materials and architectural
detail which will compliment the buildings adjacent to this site and which will continue to encourage the
overall redevelopment along the Rangeline Road Corridor.
H:\Janet\Buzzetti\Ex. B to Use Variance Application.doc
Anthony Buzzettil Veterninary Hospital
188 Ci:i~L r.........~ 1425 S.
~UV 'Ra:~tl~'
contact
Jim Shinaver
844-0106
846-8782 fax
~.'rn~
~ vvWlP wI
~